This document discusses the history of energy codes and standards in the United States, Canada, and for government buildings. It outlines the development of codes from early standards in the 1920s to current model codes like the International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) and ANSI/ASHRAE/IES Standard 90.1. It also discusses compliance paths within these codes, like prescriptive and performance-based approaches. Finally, it introduces the concept of using Passive House three-pillar benchmark criteria as an alternative compliance path within codes.
The document analyzes the energy savings and return on investment (ROI) from improving insulation (U-values) in buildings across the Middle East. It details:
- Six building types modeled in five locations, comparing baseline U-values to improved specifications using Kingspan insulation products.
- Construction details for walls, floors, and roofs. Walls used two methods: insulated render or insulated cladding.
- Analysis found 100% of models showed energy savings. Up to 92 tonnes of annual CO2 could be saved in one building. Over 20% of models showed an ROI over 200%, while 84% showed over 100% ROI.
- Despite upfront cost increases of 0.
Introductory Guide to the Changes in the Building Regulations Part L 2013SpecifiedBy
The next update of the Building Regulations 2010 for England and Wales is upon us, and this time it is Part L, and the conservation of fuel and power.
This handy guide will attempt to break it down to what you need to know, why you need to know it, how to go about finding out more, and why you’re doing all this in the first place.
This document establishes an energy code supplement for Ithaca, New York with requirements above the state energy code. It provides two compliance paths - an "Easy Path" requiring a minimum of 6 points from listed categories, and a "Whole Building Path" requiring compliance with a recognized green building standard. The Easy Path includes points for electrification measures like heat pumps, affordability improvements, renewable energy, and density/walkability factors. The document defines key terms and outlines applicability and compliance requirements for residential and commercial buildings.
Restoration of Clarendon Hotel St Clairsville OhioHeritage Ohio
This document summarizes a tax credit workshop held in St. Clairsville, Ohio on November 9, 2009. It discusses the Clarendon Hotel, a historic building from 1889 eligible for state and federal rehabilitation tax credits. It outlines the hotel's history, character defining features, and plans to rehabilitate it in stages to qualify for tax credits. The workshop also covered green building initiatives, integrating historic preservation and sustainability, and recent legislation expanding tax credits for historic rehabilitation projects.
The document outlines changes to Ireland's building regulations regarding nearly zero-energy buildings (NZEB) and major renovations as required by the EU Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD). Key points include:
1) New dwellings must meet NZEB standards by 2020, achieving a 70% reduction in energy use compared to 2005 through high insulation levels, efficient services, and renewable energy sources providing at least 20% of energy.
2) Major renovations affecting over 25% of a building must upgrade energy performance to a cost-optimal level of 125kWh/m2 annually through measures like insulation, boiler upgrades, and electric heating replacement.
3) The 2019 building regulations introduce these changes
Sean Armstrong from the DHPLG gave a presentation on updates to Part L and DEAP of the Irish Building Regulations regarding nearly zero-energy buildings and major renovations. Key changes included more stringent energy performance standards for new dwellings reaching nearly zero-energy levels, and requiring major renovations to meet cost-optimal energy performance levels. Pratima Washan from AECOM presented on their recent cost-optimal study calculating the energy performance levels that achieve the lowest cost over a building's lifetime for new buildings and renovations.
The document analyzes the energy savings and return on investment (ROI) from improving insulation (U-values) in buildings across the Middle East. It details:
- Six building types modeled in five locations, comparing baseline U-values to improved specifications using Kingspan insulation products.
- Construction details for walls, floors, and roofs. Walls used two methods: insulated render or insulated cladding.
- Analysis found 100% of models showed energy savings. Up to 92 tonnes of annual CO2 could be saved in one building. Over 20% of models showed an ROI over 200%, while 84% showed over 100% ROI.
- Despite upfront cost increases of 0.
Introductory Guide to the Changes in the Building Regulations Part L 2013SpecifiedBy
The next update of the Building Regulations 2010 for England and Wales is upon us, and this time it is Part L, and the conservation of fuel and power.
This handy guide will attempt to break it down to what you need to know, why you need to know it, how to go about finding out more, and why you’re doing all this in the first place.
This document establishes an energy code supplement for Ithaca, New York with requirements above the state energy code. It provides two compliance paths - an "Easy Path" requiring a minimum of 6 points from listed categories, and a "Whole Building Path" requiring compliance with a recognized green building standard. The Easy Path includes points for electrification measures like heat pumps, affordability improvements, renewable energy, and density/walkability factors. The document defines key terms and outlines applicability and compliance requirements for residential and commercial buildings.
Restoration of Clarendon Hotel St Clairsville OhioHeritage Ohio
This document summarizes a tax credit workshop held in St. Clairsville, Ohio on November 9, 2009. It discusses the Clarendon Hotel, a historic building from 1889 eligible for state and federal rehabilitation tax credits. It outlines the hotel's history, character defining features, and plans to rehabilitate it in stages to qualify for tax credits. The workshop also covered green building initiatives, integrating historic preservation and sustainability, and recent legislation expanding tax credits for historic rehabilitation projects.
The document outlines changes to Ireland's building regulations regarding nearly zero-energy buildings (NZEB) and major renovations as required by the EU Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD). Key points include:
1) New dwellings must meet NZEB standards by 2020, achieving a 70% reduction in energy use compared to 2005 through high insulation levels, efficient services, and renewable energy sources providing at least 20% of energy.
2) Major renovations affecting over 25% of a building must upgrade energy performance to a cost-optimal level of 125kWh/m2 annually through measures like insulation, boiler upgrades, and electric heating replacement.
3) The 2019 building regulations introduce these changes
Sean Armstrong from the DHPLG gave a presentation on updates to Part L and DEAP of the Irish Building Regulations regarding nearly zero-energy buildings and major renovations. Key changes included more stringent energy performance standards for new dwellings reaching nearly zero-energy levels, and requiring major renovations to meet cost-optimal energy performance levels. Pratima Washan from AECOM presented on their recent cost-optimal study calculating the energy performance levels that achieve the lowest cost over a building's lifetime for new buildings and renovations.
This document provides an overview of several key codes that apply to electrical design, including:
- The National Electrical Code (NEC), maintained by NFPA, which handles all electrical installation requirements. Most states adopt the NEC.
- The International Building Code (IBC), maintained by the ICC, which addresses fire alarm and egress lighting requirements. It is also widely adopted.
- NFPA 72 for fire alarm system design and NFPA 101 for additional egress and emergency lighting standards.
- The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), which has significant impact on architectural design elements.
- Energy codes like ASHRAE and IECC that regulate maximum energy usage for lighting and control
This document discusses insulated metal panels (IMPs) and provides information on their advantages, specifications, and business development opportunities. It reviews relevant codes and policies, how IMPs can help projects qualify for LEED and tax credits, and examples of energy modeling cost savings when using IMPs. The document also includes case studies of IMP projects and defines important terms related to IMP performance ratings and specifications.
The document summarizes a council presentation about adopting updated building codes. It discusses that the city currently uses older editions of codes and that 2012 editions are now available. It provides an overview of changes including clarification, harmonization, and new materials/methods. It also discusses increasing minimum permit valuations, public outreach, adopting new fire and life safety codes, and key changes including requirements for sprinklers, CO alarms, and aerial access. The construction board and staff recommend approving the adoption of updated codes.
The document discusses ASHRAE's goals and initiatives around sustainability and net zero energy buildings. It outlines ASHRAE's roadmap to develop tools enabling net zero energy buildings by 2030 through standards like 90.1 and 189.1. It also discusses opportunities in existing buildings, which represent most buildings that will exist in 2030 and offer the greatest potential for reduced energy use through retrofits.
Jeff Boldt of KJWW presents ASHRAE 90.1, The Big Picture. Jeff is a member of the 90.1 Mechanical Sub-Committee. Presented at the 2008 ASHRAE Region VI CRC in Chicago, Illinois.
May 15, 16, 17
This document provides an overview of Massachusetts' Stretch Energy Code and how it aims to help municipalities create a greener energy future. The Stretch Code is an optional appendix to the base energy code that is approximately 15-20% more stringent. It covers new construction, additions, and renovations of both residential and small commercial buildings. Compliance can be shown through either a performance path using tools like the Home Energy Rating System, or a prescriptive path with requirements for things like window efficiency and duct sealing. Training is provided to help builders and code officials understand and implement the new standards.
CIB TG66 North America Webinar 2010-10-12 2 Darren B MeyersINIVE EEIG
The North American session of the international webinar series,"THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ENERGY EFFICIENT BUILDINGS POLICIES IN 5 CONTINENTS" was held on October 12, 2010 9:00 am, Eastern Daylight Time (New York, GMT-04:00).
The agenda for the free 2-hour webinar was:
· North America: Public and Private Measures for Fostering the Adaptation of Green Building Practices, Jonathan Westeinde, Chair, Green Building Advisory Group, North American Commission for Environmental Cooperation
· United States: Country Report on Building Energy Codes & Standards Regulation in the United States, Darren B. Meyers, Technical Director, Energy Programs, International Code Council
· Canada: Canadian Energy Efficient Building Policies, James Clark, Buildings Division, Office of Energy Efficiency, Natural Resources Canada
· Mexico: Toward Energy Efficiency in Housing in Mexico, Evangelina Hirata, Consultant on Energy Efficiency in Housing
· United States: Beyond the Code -- Energy, Carbon, and Cost Savings using Conventional Building Technologies, Joshua Kneifel, Economist, National Institute of Standards and Technology
WoodWorks 2013 Vancouver - Energy-Efficient Building Enclosure Design Guideli...Graham Finch
Presentation from the 2013 Vancouver Woodworks Conference (October 29, 2013). Covers an overview of the considerations for energy-efficient wood frame building enclosures while outlining the content of a new guideline document published by FP Innovations "Guide for Designing Energy Efficiency Building Enclosures for Wood-Frame Multi-Unit Residential Buildings in Marine to Cold Climate Zones in North America"
The document discusses India's Energy Conservation Building Code (ECBC). It aims to set minimum energy efficiency standards for building design and construction. The ECBC encourages energy efficient practices that do not compromise occupant comfort or economic considerations. It provides the central and state governments powers to enforce compliance. The ECBC is estimated to reduce building energy use by 25-40% through requirements for the building envelope, lighting, HVAC, and other systems. Widespread adoption could yield annual national energy savings of over 1.7 billion kWh. Implementation faces barriers around first costs, product availability, and testing/certification.
The document proposes updates to Massachusetts' stretch energy code to help achieve the state's climate goals. It recommends (1) tightening the residential stretch code to require Home Energy Rating System scores of 42 for gas heating or 45 for electric heating, (2) introducing a specialized opt-in stretch code defining "net-zero" buildings and requiring solar panels and electric readiness for gas buildings, and (3) updating the commercial stretch code with more stringent efficiency standards tailored to different building types to lower emissions cost-effectively. Public comments are sought on the straw proposal.
X472 class 09 2 of 2 title 24 and leedmichaeljmack
This document provides an overview of building energy codes and incentives. It discusses:
- How codes push laggards while incentives pull innovators, and incentives will become future regulations.
- New building and existing building regulations and incentives in California, including LEED, utility programs, and Title 24.
- Studies showing energy regulations and public programs in California have reduced energy use and avoided power plant construction.
- An overview of federal energy acts, voluntary standards like LEED and ASHRAE, and the scopes of codes like IECC, ASHRAE 90.1, and Title 24.
This document provides a summary of rule changes to Part 4 of the ABS Rules for Building and Classing Steel Vessels that will take effect in 2016. It lists changes by effective date and references the affected section and paragraph numbers. Changes include clarifications to certification requirements, alignment with international standards, and additional safety margins for structural analysis. The document aims to notify readers of technical changes introduced in the latest edition of the ABS steel vessel rules.
This training module is one of a series produced by the Australian Building Codes Board; the organisation responsible for the development and maintenance of the National Construction Code (NCC)
For the purposes of this presentation it is assumed that participants have a general understanding of the content of ABCB training Modules One and Two
The document discusses the requirements for inspecting air conditioning systems over 12kW in buildings according to the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive Article 9. Key points include that inspections must occur every 5 years and failure to comply can result in fines for building owners. Inspections assess efficiency, sizing, and provide advice on improvements. They aim to promote energy efficiency in buildings across the EU.
A unified framework for fire safety regulation - Monideep Dey, PhD, President...Dr. Monideep Dey
This paper presents the general principles and outline of a framework for fire safety regulation that covers both prescriptive and performance-based fire safety. The immediate benefit of this framework is to allow development of a systematic top-down or global approach to fire safety, as opposed to piecemeal, that can be used to develop schemes for use with existing ISO conformity assessment standards. The framework can also eventually be used to make improvements to fire codes to unify prescriptive and performance-based requirements.
A Unified International Standard that Covers Prescriptive and Performance-Bas...Dr. Monideep Dey
This paper presents a proposal for development of a unified international standard that covers both prescriptive and performance-based fire safety. Presently, most countries have a prescriptive framework for the requirements for fire safety. Countries that have developed a Performance-Based Code (PBC) for fire safety, e.g. New Zealand, still had to maintain many prescriptive requirements that cannot be replaced using performance-based approaches. Several countries now allow the use of performance-based fire safety design within the framework of its prescriptive fire safety requirements, but in many cases demonstrating the equivalence of the performance-based design with the prescriptive requirements is difficult. A framework and methodology for a unified approach to fire safety requirements, that will allow the use of both sets of requirements in a fire safety program, including an exchange of one set with the other, does not exist at the present. This has been identified as a gap for the use of more modern fire safety design methods.
Monideep Dey, PhD
President, Deytec, Inc.
1. The document discusses regulatory frameworks and standards for hydrogen across various countries and regions including ISO, IEC, EIGA, USA, EU, Australia, Japan, China, and India.
2. Key standards organizations discussed are ISO TC 197 which has published 17 hydrogen standards, IEC TC 105, and EIGA.
3. The USA Energy Policy Act of 2005 established a hydrogen and fuel cell program and task force to develop the hydrogen economy and commercialize fuel cells, with goals of demonstrating fuel cell vehicles by 2015 and a hydrogen infrastructure by 2020.
4. India has adopted several ISO hydrogen standards and is developing its own standards and regulations through the National Hydrogen Energy Mission to promote green hydrogen.
The document outlines the 2010 program plan for EPRI's CoalFleet for Tomorrow program, which aims to accelerate deployment of advanced coal-based power plants. It describes 3 project sets focusing on (1) engineering and economic evaluations of combustion and gasification technologies, (2) support for gasification projects, and (3) design guidelines for ultra-supercritical pulverized coal plants and carbon capture technologies. Key 2010 deliverables include technology assessments, design specifications, economic studies, and reports on materials development programs and the National Carbon Capture Center.
This document provides an overview of several key codes that apply to electrical design, including:
- The National Electrical Code (NEC), maintained by NFPA, which handles all electrical installation requirements. Most states adopt the NEC.
- The International Building Code (IBC), maintained by the ICC, which addresses fire alarm and egress lighting requirements. It is also widely adopted.
- NFPA 72 for fire alarm system design and NFPA 101 for additional egress and emergency lighting standards.
- The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), which has significant impact on architectural design elements.
- Energy codes like ASHRAE and IECC that regulate maximum energy usage for lighting and control
This document discusses insulated metal panels (IMPs) and provides information on their advantages, specifications, and business development opportunities. It reviews relevant codes and policies, how IMPs can help projects qualify for LEED and tax credits, and examples of energy modeling cost savings when using IMPs. The document also includes case studies of IMP projects and defines important terms related to IMP performance ratings and specifications.
The document summarizes a council presentation about adopting updated building codes. It discusses that the city currently uses older editions of codes and that 2012 editions are now available. It provides an overview of changes including clarification, harmonization, and new materials/methods. It also discusses increasing minimum permit valuations, public outreach, adopting new fire and life safety codes, and key changes including requirements for sprinklers, CO alarms, and aerial access. The construction board and staff recommend approving the adoption of updated codes.
The document discusses ASHRAE's goals and initiatives around sustainability and net zero energy buildings. It outlines ASHRAE's roadmap to develop tools enabling net zero energy buildings by 2030 through standards like 90.1 and 189.1. It also discusses opportunities in existing buildings, which represent most buildings that will exist in 2030 and offer the greatest potential for reduced energy use through retrofits.
Jeff Boldt of KJWW presents ASHRAE 90.1, The Big Picture. Jeff is a member of the 90.1 Mechanical Sub-Committee. Presented at the 2008 ASHRAE Region VI CRC in Chicago, Illinois.
May 15, 16, 17
This document provides an overview of Massachusetts' Stretch Energy Code and how it aims to help municipalities create a greener energy future. The Stretch Code is an optional appendix to the base energy code that is approximately 15-20% more stringent. It covers new construction, additions, and renovations of both residential and small commercial buildings. Compliance can be shown through either a performance path using tools like the Home Energy Rating System, or a prescriptive path with requirements for things like window efficiency and duct sealing. Training is provided to help builders and code officials understand and implement the new standards.
CIB TG66 North America Webinar 2010-10-12 2 Darren B MeyersINIVE EEIG
The North American session of the international webinar series,"THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ENERGY EFFICIENT BUILDINGS POLICIES IN 5 CONTINENTS" was held on October 12, 2010 9:00 am, Eastern Daylight Time (New York, GMT-04:00).
The agenda for the free 2-hour webinar was:
· North America: Public and Private Measures for Fostering the Adaptation of Green Building Practices, Jonathan Westeinde, Chair, Green Building Advisory Group, North American Commission for Environmental Cooperation
· United States: Country Report on Building Energy Codes & Standards Regulation in the United States, Darren B. Meyers, Technical Director, Energy Programs, International Code Council
· Canada: Canadian Energy Efficient Building Policies, James Clark, Buildings Division, Office of Energy Efficiency, Natural Resources Canada
· Mexico: Toward Energy Efficiency in Housing in Mexico, Evangelina Hirata, Consultant on Energy Efficiency in Housing
· United States: Beyond the Code -- Energy, Carbon, and Cost Savings using Conventional Building Technologies, Joshua Kneifel, Economist, National Institute of Standards and Technology
WoodWorks 2013 Vancouver - Energy-Efficient Building Enclosure Design Guideli...Graham Finch
Presentation from the 2013 Vancouver Woodworks Conference (October 29, 2013). Covers an overview of the considerations for energy-efficient wood frame building enclosures while outlining the content of a new guideline document published by FP Innovations "Guide for Designing Energy Efficiency Building Enclosures for Wood-Frame Multi-Unit Residential Buildings in Marine to Cold Climate Zones in North America"
The document discusses India's Energy Conservation Building Code (ECBC). It aims to set minimum energy efficiency standards for building design and construction. The ECBC encourages energy efficient practices that do not compromise occupant comfort or economic considerations. It provides the central and state governments powers to enforce compliance. The ECBC is estimated to reduce building energy use by 25-40% through requirements for the building envelope, lighting, HVAC, and other systems. Widespread adoption could yield annual national energy savings of over 1.7 billion kWh. Implementation faces barriers around first costs, product availability, and testing/certification.
The document proposes updates to Massachusetts' stretch energy code to help achieve the state's climate goals. It recommends (1) tightening the residential stretch code to require Home Energy Rating System scores of 42 for gas heating or 45 for electric heating, (2) introducing a specialized opt-in stretch code defining "net-zero" buildings and requiring solar panels and electric readiness for gas buildings, and (3) updating the commercial stretch code with more stringent efficiency standards tailored to different building types to lower emissions cost-effectively. Public comments are sought on the straw proposal.
X472 class 09 2 of 2 title 24 and leedmichaeljmack
This document provides an overview of building energy codes and incentives. It discusses:
- How codes push laggards while incentives pull innovators, and incentives will become future regulations.
- New building and existing building regulations and incentives in California, including LEED, utility programs, and Title 24.
- Studies showing energy regulations and public programs in California have reduced energy use and avoided power plant construction.
- An overview of federal energy acts, voluntary standards like LEED and ASHRAE, and the scopes of codes like IECC, ASHRAE 90.1, and Title 24.
This document provides a summary of rule changes to Part 4 of the ABS Rules for Building and Classing Steel Vessels that will take effect in 2016. It lists changes by effective date and references the affected section and paragraph numbers. Changes include clarifications to certification requirements, alignment with international standards, and additional safety margins for structural analysis. The document aims to notify readers of technical changes introduced in the latest edition of the ABS steel vessel rules.
This training module is one of a series produced by the Australian Building Codes Board; the organisation responsible for the development and maintenance of the National Construction Code (NCC)
For the purposes of this presentation it is assumed that participants have a general understanding of the content of ABCB training Modules One and Two
The document discusses the requirements for inspecting air conditioning systems over 12kW in buildings according to the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive Article 9. Key points include that inspections must occur every 5 years and failure to comply can result in fines for building owners. Inspections assess efficiency, sizing, and provide advice on improvements. They aim to promote energy efficiency in buildings across the EU.
A unified framework for fire safety regulation - Monideep Dey, PhD, President...Dr. Monideep Dey
This paper presents the general principles and outline of a framework for fire safety regulation that covers both prescriptive and performance-based fire safety. The immediate benefit of this framework is to allow development of a systematic top-down or global approach to fire safety, as opposed to piecemeal, that can be used to develop schemes for use with existing ISO conformity assessment standards. The framework can also eventually be used to make improvements to fire codes to unify prescriptive and performance-based requirements.
A Unified International Standard that Covers Prescriptive and Performance-Bas...Dr. Monideep Dey
This paper presents a proposal for development of a unified international standard that covers both prescriptive and performance-based fire safety. Presently, most countries have a prescriptive framework for the requirements for fire safety. Countries that have developed a Performance-Based Code (PBC) for fire safety, e.g. New Zealand, still had to maintain many prescriptive requirements that cannot be replaced using performance-based approaches. Several countries now allow the use of performance-based fire safety design within the framework of its prescriptive fire safety requirements, but in many cases demonstrating the equivalence of the performance-based design with the prescriptive requirements is difficult. A framework and methodology for a unified approach to fire safety requirements, that will allow the use of both sets of requirements in a fire safety program, including an exchange of one set with the other, does not exist at the present. This has been identified as a gap for the use of more modern fire safety design methods.
Monideep Dey, PhD
President, Deytec, Inc.
1. The document discusses regulatory frameworks and standards for hydrogen across various countries and regions including ISO, IEC, EIGA, USA, EU, Australia, Japan, China, and India.
2. Key standards organizations discussed are ISO TC 197 which has published 17 hydrogen standards, IEC TC 105, and EIGA.
3. The USA Energy Policy Act of 2005 established a hydrogen and fuel cell program and task force to develop the hydrogen economy and commercialize fuel cells, with goals of demonstrating fuel cell vehicles by 2015 and a hydrogen infrastructure by 2020.
4. India has adopted several ISO hydrogen standards and is developing its own standards and regulations through the National Hydrogen Energy Mission to promote green hydrogen.
The document outlines the 2010 program plan for EPRI's CoalFleet for Tomorrow program, which aims to accelerate deployment of advanced coal-based power plants. It describes 3 project sets focusing on (1) engineering and economic evaluations of combustion and gasification technologies, (2) support for gasification projects, and (3) design guidelines for ultra-supercritical pulverized coal plants and carbon capture technologies. Key 2010 deliverables include technology assessments, design specifications, economic studies, and reports on materials development programs and the National Carbon Capture Center.
1. PHR
COULD PASSIVE HOUSE 3-
PILLAR BENCHMARK
PERFORMANCE CRITERIA
BECOME AN ALTERNATIVE CODE
COMPLIANCE PATH?
By: Joseph C. Zimmer, Architect Association of Licensed Architects (ALA) - member
International Code Council (ICC) – Certified Building Official (CBO)
Passive House Institute US (PHIUS) – Certified Passive House Consultant (CPHC)
2. PHR
PASSIVEHOUSE3-PILLARBENCHMARKPERFORMANCECRITERIA
ASANALTERNATIVECODECOMPLIANCEPATH?
Learning objectives
1. Understand the history of development of energy
conservation standards and codes in the US and Canada
2. Understand the current most widely used paths to energy
code compliance in the US and Canada and their ‘paths’ to
compliance
3. Ability to consider and select a path to code compliance –
including projects required or desiring to achieve PHIUS+ or
another ‘better than code’ building energy standard
4. Understand how a 3-pillar benchmark performance criteria
aligned with Passive House methodology could become another
alternative path to code compliance within the ICC IECC
4. PHR
PASSIVEHOUSE3-PILLARBENCHMARKPERFORMANCECRITERIA
ASANALTERNATIVECODECOMPLIANCEPATH?
United States
1922 – Department of Commerce Building Code Committee
established
1934 – US Housing Act establishes FHA to allow for actuarially
sound, low interest, long term loans on private homes
1965 – HUD established, ending FHA’s tradition as independent
agency
1968 – Civil Rights/Fair Housing Act causes establishment of
Government National Mortgage association (GNMA)
1973 - HUD creates Minimum Property Standards (MPS) to
further reduce mortgage risk – thus encouraging private entity
lending
1977 – BOCA, SBCCI and ICBO co-publish Code for Energy
Conservation
1978 – President Carter administration via Public law 95-619
adds energy performance requirements to the HUD MPS
1983 – Congress passed law that allowed HUD to reference a
model or local code in lieu of authoring its own MPS
1983 – The Council of American Building Officials (CABO), a joint
effort of BOCA, SBCCI, ICBO and the American Insurance
Association (each a promulgator of model building codes)
published the first edition of the Model Energy Code (MEC) plus
five subsequent editions through 1995.
1994 – Following three sequential national disaster hurricanes in
the late 1980’s FEMA requested that BOCA, SBCCI and ICBO merge
to promulgate a single family of codes resulting in the
International Code Council (ICC)
1998 – ICC publishes the first edition of the International Energy
Conservation Code (IECC) replacing the CABO MEC.
Canada
1974 – Department of Energy, Mines and Resources request
draft guidelines for energy conservation in buildings
1977 – First draft of guidelines, based largely upon prescriptive
path option of the ANSI/ASHRAE/IES Standard 90.1, completed
1978 – First edition Measures for Energy Conservation in
Buildings (MECB) published.
1983 – Second edition of MECB added new section specific to
low rise residential (residences)
1997 – National Research Council of Canada (NRCC) publishes
first editions of Model National Energy Code for Buildings (MNECB)
and Model National Energy Code for Houses (MNECH)
2007 – NRCC forms standing committee on Energy Efficient
Buildings
2010 – MNECH becomes Part 9 of National Building Code
applicable to Houses and small buildings
2011 – NRCC standing committee efforts result in 2011 edition of
the MNECB and establishes policy to develop new editions every
three years
History of Code and Standard development
US State of California
1978 – Energy Commission established energy efficiency
standards
1978 – Title 24, the Statewide codes for buildings, adds Part 6
pertaining to energy efficiency.
1980 through 2013 – Thirteen subsequent editions of Title
24, Part 6 published
5. PHR
PASSIVEHOUSE3-PILLARBENCHMARKPERFORMANCECRITERIA
ASANALTERNATIVECODECOMPLIANCEPATH?
ICC IECC
1998 – first edition published is the first code published by the
ICC, and replaces the CABO MEC. Chapter 6 was for commercial
(other than ≤ 3 story residential) buildings and simply made
reference to ANSI/ASHRAE/IES Standard 90.1
The residential provisions include ‘prescriptive’ path to compliance
with a building envelope UA ‘trade-off’ option specific to the
building envelope requirements – same as MEC had
2000 – first edition of complete family of codes published by the
ICC – ending publication of subsequent editions of model codes by
BOCA, SBCCI and ICBO. The IRC, a comprehensive ‘single book’ for
1-2 family dwellings and townhomes not more than 3 stories in
height, includes Chapter 11 as a duplication of the residential
provisions of the IECC
2003 – Commercial building provisions of this edition include
‘simplified’ code text as compliance path alternative to meeting
referenced ANSI/ASHRAE/IES Standard 90.1
2004 – Supplement to the 2003 IECC edition introduces sections
to the commercial and residential provisions which allow a
‘proposed’ to ‘standard reference’ building comparison
‘performance’ compliance path alternative to the ‘prescriptive’
compliance path – a simplified version of ANSI/ASHRAE/IES
Standard 90.1 ‘energy cost budget’ compliance path
2006 – First edition where commercial energy efficiency
provisions chapter clearly lists three compliance path alternatives
– ‘prescriptive’, comparative ‘performance’ or any of methods
contained in ANSI/ASHRAE/IES Standard 90.1. Prior editions had
done so indirectly in the administrative provisions chapter.
2015 – Residential provisions add section that allows for ‘Energy
Rating Index’ comparative building rating/score path as an
alternative to ‘prescriptive’ and building comparison ‘performance’
path. This section’s ‘reference’ building is one meeting the
‘prescriptive’ requirements of the 2006 edition
ANSI/ASHRAE/IES Standard 90.1
1916 – AIEE, ASME, ASCE, AIME, ASTM, US Department of War,
US Department of Navy and US Department of Commerce
combine efforts to form the American National Standards Institute
(ANSI). ANSI continues to create standards that enable a global
economy
1959 – ASHAE and ASRE merge to form American Society of
Heating, Refrigerating and Air conditioning Engineers
1975 – First edition of Standard 90 – Energy Standard for
Buildings except Low-Rise Residential Buildings.
1980 through 1999 – Subsequent editions (Standard 90.1)
published
2001 – First edition after ANSI, ASHRAE and IES agreed to
subsequently publish editions every third year. These include
‘prescriptive’ (with building envelope ‘trade-off’ option) and
‘proposed’ to ‘energy cost budget’ building comparison
‘performance’ paths to compliance
2007 – Normative Index appendix G, a comparative building
‘performance rating’ method is introduced
History of Code and Standard development
US State of Wisconsin UDC
1978 – First edition of Comm 22, Energy Conservation for 1-2
family dwellings published
1980 – Comm 20 through 25, the Uniform Dwelling Code (UDC)
for 1-2 family dwellings, including Comm 22 first published.
Continual updates occur.
6. PHR
History of Government owned building performance policy
United States (GSA)
2006 – MoU between 19 Federal Agencies and the General
Services Administration (GSA) requires all Federal new
construction and major renovation projects to follow the USGBC’s
LEED rating system and achieve not less than a ‘Gold’ rating. As a
result all GSA projects must use an energy modeling/simulation
software capable of following the ANSI/ASHRAE/IES Standard 90.1
– Appendix G building comparison ‘performance rating’
methodology
Appendix
G
2007 – Energy Independence and Security Act President George
W. Bush executive order 13514 requires, starting in 2020, all
federally owned buildings to reduce their fossil fuel generated
energy use 100% by 2030.
The Act includes provisions that encourage States to keep their
building energy standards for private and State owned buildings
progressing to higher performance levels by adopting the latest
edition of model codes and/or standards within 18 month of
publication – ICC IECC and/or ANSI/ASHRAE/IES Standard 90.1
Canada (crown)
1991 – Federal Building Initiative requires all crown owned
buildings to improve their energy performance
2008 – Federal Sustainable Development Strategy requires
reduction of emission levels of all crown owned buildings by 17%
between 2005 and 2020
2011 – All 40,000 crown owned buildings determined their 2005
annual CO2e baseline emissions (benchmark)
2012 – All new, build to lease and major renovation projects
>1000 m2 crown owned projects required to meet LEED Silver,
Green Globes 3 Globes or equivalent through 1) Canada GBC LEED
(thus using ANSI/ASHRAE/IES Standard 90.1 Appendix G)
Appendix G
2) GBI Green Globes (one of 4 methods), or
3) BOMA BESt (Building Environmental Standards) assessment and
certification
PASSIVEHOUSE3-PILLARBENCHMARKPERFORMANCECRITERIA
ASANALTERNATIVECODECOMPLIANCEPATH?
7. PHR
PASSIVEHOUSE3-PILLARBENCHMARKPERFORMANCECRITERIA
ASANALTERNATIVECODECOMPLIANCEPATH?
United States
International Code Council (ICC)
IECC and ANSI/ASHRAE/IES
90.1
Residential & Commercial Commercial only
IRC (International Residential Code) Chapter 11 – duplicate of IECC residential provisions
Canada
Under direction of Canadian Commission on Building and Fire Codes
National Research Council of Canada (NRCC)
(Model) National Energy Code for Buildings (MNECB)
2011
Commercial
(all except Houses
and small buildings)
2010
(Model) National Building Code Part 9 (MNBC)
Houses and small buildings
Current most popular model codes and standards
In use or adopted in 47 (94%)
States, DC, Puerto Rico,
Virgin Islands and basis for
State issued code in MN
In use or adopted in 49 (98%)
States, DC, and Virgin Islands
Title 24
Part 6
ANSI/ASHRAE/IE
S 90.1 - 2007
Uniform
Dwelling Code
Comm 22
2011 edition in use or adopted in 5 (38%) provinces/territories
British Columbia, Alberta, Manitoba, Ontario and Nova Scotia
1997 edition or other in use in 8 provinces/territories
Yukon, Northwest territories, Nanavut, Saskatchewan, Quebec,
Newfoundland and Labrador, new Brunswick and Prince Edward island
2010 edition in use or adopted in 10 (77%) provinces/territories
Yukon, Northwest Territories, British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan,
Manitoba, Ontario, Nova Scotia. Prince Edward Island, Newfoundland and
Labrador
Earlier edition or other in use in 3 provinces/territories
Nanavut, Quebec, New Brunswick
8. PHR
PASSIVEHOUSE3-PILLARBENCHMARKPERFORMANCECRITERIA
ASANALTERNATIVECODECOMPLIANCEPATH?
Current code and standard scope and methodologies
Though US National model codes and standards, US State written codes and Canadian National model
codes vary in detail or specific requirements they are all similar in concept and methodology
• All include/address building energy used for:
Space conditioning (building envelope and HVAC systems)
Service (Domestic) water heating
Receptacles (plug-ins) (MEL)
Electrical lighting
Other (auxiliary) electric motors, pumps and vertical/horizontal occupant transportation systems
Pools, spas and snowmelt systems
• Some include and some exclude building energy use for:
Process loads (in support of a manufacturing, industrial or commercial process rather than
maintaining comfort and amenities for the occupants of a building). Those that include may
allow adjustment of total building energy maximum to be adjusted to account for such loads
specific to a particular building or occupancy type.
• All allow flexibility of multiple paths to compliance including:
Regardless of path option – must meet ‘mandatory’ provisions
1. ‘Prescriptive’ – follow code authors’ prewritten recipe
Prescriptive with component/category ‘trade-off’ – make your
component/category recipe ‘equal to or better than’ code authors’ pre-written
recipe
2. ‘Performance’ comparison of ‘proposed’ to ‘standard reference/energy budget’ building
– make your whole building recipe ‘equal to or better than’ code authors’ pre-written
whole building recipe
Whole building ‘Energy Rating Index’ – Score/rate how much better (or worse) your
whole building performance recipe is than code authors’ pre-written whole building
performance recipe
NEWER
13. PHR
PASSIVEHOUSE3-PILLARBENCHMARKPERFORMANCECRITERIA
ASANALTERNATIVECODECOMPLIANCEPATH?
Prescriptive (and UA trade-off option) - IECC or 90.1 Performance(energy cost) Comparison– IECC or 90.1 Performance (energy cost) Comparison Rating –
90.1
Advantages
① Simple follow (start to finish)
prewritten recipe, summarize the
recipe – finished, no software required
② Or free easy to use USDOE COMcheck
or REScheck software to document
following prescriptive prewritten recipe
compliance or use as tool for UA trade-
off for building envelope
③ UA trade-off option provides some
limited flexibility in building envelope
components
④ Does not prevent any component or
system from having superior
performance than required by
prewritten recipe
⑤ Likely least time/effort to document
compliance
Disadvantages
① Limited flexibility
② No credit for better than prewritten
recipe HVAC, Service Water Heating,
MEL (plug-ins) or lighting performance
③ No building envelope assembly
hygrothermal analysis required
④ Performance level not required to be
transparent to project
design/construction team, code
personnel, building owner or occupants
Advantages
① Same as items 1 through 4 under
performance (energy cost) comparison
path
② Required documentation shows
percentage improvement of ‘proposed’
over ‘baseline’ building performance
③ Requires added documentation (overview
description of project, list showing compliance
with ‘mandatory’ provisions, list identifying
components that are lower performance than
‘prescriptive’ provisions, table summarizing end
use energy cost savings, site plan showing items
that may shade building, building elevations and
sections, thermal block diagram, explanation of
significant simulation assumptions, back up
calculations for component performance level
inputs, purchased energy rates, and exceptional
calculation methods)
Disadvantages
① Same as items 1 and 2 under
performance (energy cost) comparison
path
② Performance level of either ‘recipe’ or
‘proposed’ buildings not required to be
transparent to project
design/construction team, code
personnel, building owner or occupants
Advantages
① Flexibility in all components and
systems performance levels
② Several free software tools tested in
accordance with ASHRAE Standard 140
beyond USDOE’s EnergyPlus – see
software tools link
③ Requires documentation of simulated
annual energy cost, features that are
different between the ‘proposed’ and
‘standard reference/budget’ buildings
④ Requires explanation of any error
messages produced by simulation
software tool
Disadvantages
① Software tool competency and
effort/resource required
② No building envelope assembly
hygrothermal analysis required, nor is
software tool required to have
capability
③ ‘Proposed’ building need only be
‘equal to’ prewritten ‘standard
reference/budget’ building prescriptive
recipe
④ Performance level of either ‘recipe’ or
‘proposed’ buildings not required to be
transparent to project
design/construction team, code
personnel, building owner or
occupants
US Model Code/Standard compliance path advantages/disadvantages (commercial)
15. PHR
PASSIVEHOUSE3-PILLARBENCHMARKPERFORMANCECRITERIA
ASANALTERNATIVECODECOMPLIANCEPATH?
Another non-code/standard
required or chosen plus PHIUS+
PHIUS+ only (low-rise
residential projects)
PHIUS+ only (commercial /
other than low-rise residential
projects)Meet other standard requirements
① Energy model/simulation – typically a
Performance (energy cost) comparison
(ANSI/ASHRAE/IES Standard 90.1 Chapter 11)
or Performance (energy cost) comparison
rating (ANSI/ASHRAE/IES Standard 90.1
Appendix G) – [i.e. Energy Plus] for commercial,
and IECC R405 or R406 – [i.e.
REMRATE] for residential
Option of documenting prewritten non-code
standard prescriptive recipe for residential
projects
② Meet other standards mandatory prerequisites
③ Submittals to other standard agency for review
and certification
Meet PHIUS+ requirements
① Meet USDOE ZERH and USEPA ESv3 mandatory
prerequisites, energy model/simulation
requirements and submittals to US DOE and
EPA for new construction 1-2 family residential
projects
② Energy model/simulation – 3 pillar benchmark
criteria - [i.e. WUFI-Passive - dynamic] for
varying occupancy/use projects, [i.e. WUFI-
Passive – static or PHPP ] for low rise residential
constant occupancy/use projects
③ Submittals to PHIUS for review and certification
Meet Code requirements
① Document meeting mandatory requirements –
likely performance levels and QA/QC procedures
≤ PHIUS+ recommendations and requirements
② Document meeting prewritten prescriptive
recipe – [i.e. manually or using COMcheck or
REScheck] OR energy model/simulation – likely
met by requirements of other non-code
standard
③ HVAC load calculation and equipment sizing –
currently may require a third model/simulation
if other non-code standard simulation does not
calculate in accordance with
ANSI/ASHRAE/ACCA Standard 183 or equivalent
for commercial projects or ACCA manual J or
equivalent for residential projects
Meet PHIUS+ requirements
① Energy modeling/simulation – 3 pillar
benchmark criteria - [i.e. WUFI-Passive -
dynamic] for varying occupancy/use
projects
② Submittals to PHIUS for review and
certification
Meet Code requirements
① Document meeting mandatory
requirements – likely performance levels
and QA/QC procedures ≤ PHIUS+
recommendations and requirements
② Document meeting prewritten IECC or
ANSI/ASHRAE/IES Standard 90.1
prescriptive recipe – [i.e. manually or using
COMcheck] OR
energy model/simulation – IECC C407,
ANSI/ASHRAE/IES Standard 90.1 Chapter
11 or ANSI/ASHRAE/IES Standard 90.1
Appendix G – [i.e. Energy Plus]
③ HVAC load calculation and equipment
sizing – currently may require a
second/third model/simulation if other
code model/simulation does not calculate
in accordance with ANSI/ASHRAE/ACCA
Standard 183 or equivalent
Meet PHIUS+ requirements
① Meet USDOE ZERH and USEPA ESv3
mandatory prerequisites, energy
model/simulation requirements and
submittals to US DOE and EPA for new
construction 1-2 family projects
② Energy modeling/simulation – 3 pillar
benchmark criteria - [i.e. WUFI-Passive -
dynamic] for varying occupancy/use
projects, [i.e. WUFI-Passive – static or PHPP
] for constant occupancy/use projects
③ Submittals to PHIUS for review and
certification
Meet Code requirements
① Document meeting mandatory
requirements – likely performance levels
and QA/QC procedures ≤ PHIUS+
recommendations and requirements
② Document meeting prewritten prescriptive
recipe – [i.e. manually or using REScheck]
OR
energy model/simulation – IECC R405 or
R406 – [i.e. REMRATE]
③ HVAC load calculation and equipment
sizing – currently may require a
second/third model/simulation if other
code model/simulation does not calculate
in accordance with ACCA manual J or
equivalent
Current PHIUS+ 2015 project process requirements
Could optimize project process further if:
1. Code incorporated performance
benchmark compliance path
2. PHIUS+ compatible simulation
software incorporated ACCA Manual J,
ANSI/ASHRAE/ACCA Standard 183
equivalent HVAC calculations
Editor's Notes
Name, Architect, CPHC since 2012, ICC CBO since 2002
1934 Fed standards beginning mortgages, 1973 HUD MPS, 1983 Congress allows model code reference in lieu of MPS – CABO MEC in same year, 1994 ICC forms, 1998 1st IECC published
Late 1970’s earliest in all countries/states. Canada NECB 2011 and NBC 2010 California own Title 24, Part 6
IECC 1st in 1998, progression of editions issues add flexibility for compliance and improved performance
Standard 90.1 in 1975 1st of all standards in US and Canada WI stand alone state in US for residential
US and Canada national building projects require specific method, unfortunately do not include performance benchmark path or PH as an option
IECC, Standard 90.1 for commercial in 94% of US
IECC residential provisions and IRC chapter 11 identical and 98% of US Canada less dominance, but also separates houses and small buildings into building code
Regardless of code, same issues and multiple options to compliance
Canada unique with more trade-off options, skip ahead
IECC commercial Always mandatory andatory Prescriptive includes trade-off for building envelope only and some exceptions specific to building envelope
Performance has specific energy modeling software requirements must show proposed <85% of reference building
ASHRAE 90.1 paths all allowed by reference from IECC commercial provisions
Building performance is to Passive House level regardless of these administrative efforts