- Most Americans eat vegetables, grains, dairy, and fruit more frequently than meat like beef and pork. About half eat vegetables, grains, and dairy almost daily.
- Americans most commonly eat home-cooked dinners prepared by themselves or their household 2-5 times per week or daily. Fast food and restaurant dinners are less frequent.
- Plant-based meat and dairy alternatives are eaten infrequently, with most Americans saying they never or almost never consume tofu, plant-based meat, or dairy alternatives.
Healthy Diets From Sustainable Food Systems
Without action, the world risks failing to meet the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the Paris Agreement, and today’s children will inherit a planet that has been severely degraded and where much of the population will increasingly suffer from malnutrition and preventable disease.
From the report : Medical research has shown that eating cholesterol has no influence on the level of cholesterol in the blood or on potential heart diseases .Neither has a link between saturated fat intake and cardiovascular risk ever been proven.
From plant-based beef to chicken grown from cells, alternatives to conventional meat are attracting considerable innovation and investment worldwide.
These new foods have everyone from vegans to meat corporations excited, but what does this global trend mean for Australian business, agriculture and science?
Protein is critical to Human health . An estimated 2 billion people suffer from undernutrition - a lack of access to key micronutrients
- Resulting in major health risks .Those in the worlds poorest countries remain vulnerable to malnutrition .
The Protein Challenge an Initiative of the WWF ( world wildlife fund) , Gain (The Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition ) , industrial partner Quorn - Volac - Hershey - Target- Waitrose
The Estimated Amount ,Value , and Calories of Postharvest Food Losses at the Retail and Consumer Levels in the United States .
The study also reviewed literature and found that food loss is economically efficient in some cases . There is a practical limit to how much food loss the United States or any other country could realistically prevent , reduce , or recover for human consumption given (1) Technical Factors ( eg .the persihable nature of foods , food safety , storage ,and temperature considerations : (2) Temporal and spatial factors (eg the time needed to deliver food to a new destination , and the dispersion of food loss among millions of households,food processing plants , and food service locations
(3) individual consumers tastes, preferences,and food habits ( eg throwing out left over milk in a bowl of cereal ) : and (4) economic factors ( eg cost to recover and redirect uneaten food to another use )
Future of food - An initial perspective by Prof. Wayne Bryden, Foundation C...Future Agenda
An initial perspective on the future of food by Prof. Wayne Bryden, Foundation Chair in Animal Science at the University of Queensland. This is the starting point for the global future agenda discussions taking place through 2015 as part of the futureagenda2.0 programme. www.futureagenda.org
The Market for Sustainable Meat Alternatives and the $38 Billion Subsidy of ...New Food Innovation Ltd
This is a review of the Meat alternatives market , One of the Interesting points from the review ;-
The US government spends $38 Billion each year to subsidise the meat and dairy industries , but only 0.04 % of this on Fruit and Vegetables . A $5 Big Mac would cost $13 if retail price included the hidden expenses that the meat offloads onto society . A pound of Hamburger will cost $30 without government subsidies
2019 Global Food Policy Report and 2019 EAT-Lancet Report
Co-Organized by Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Netherlands and IFPRI
JUN 4, 2019 - 02:30 PM TO 05:00 PM CEST
Healthy Diets From Sustainable Food Systems
Without action, the world risks failing to meet the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the Paris Agreement, and today’s children will inherit a planet that has been severely degraded and where much of the population will increasingly suffer from malnutrition and preventable disease.
From the report : Medical research has shown that eating cholesterol has no influence on the level of cholesterol in the blood or on potential heart diseases .Neither has a link between saturated fat intake and cardiovascular risk ever been proven.
From plant-based beef to chicken grown from cells, alternatives to conventional meat are attracting considerable innovation and investment worldwide.
These new foods have everyone from vegans to meat corporations excited, but what does this global trend mean for Australian business, agriculture and science?
Protein is critical to Human health . An estimated 2 billion people suffer from undernutrition - a lack of access to key micronutrients
- Resulting in major health risks .Those in the worlds poorest countries remain vulnerable to malnutrition .
The Protein Challenge an Initiative of the WWF ( world wildlife fund) , Gain (The Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition ) , industrial partner Quorn - Volac - Hershey - Target- Waitrose
The Estimated Amount ,Value , and Calories of Postharvest Food Losses at the Retail and Consumer Levels in the United States .
The study also reviewed literature and found that food loss is economically efficient in some cases . There is a practical limit to how much food loss the United States or any other country could realistically prevent , reduce , or recover for human consumption given (1) Technical Factors ( eg .the persihable nature of foods , food safety , storage ,and temperature considerations : (2) Temporal and spatial factors (eg the time needed to deliver food to a new destination , and the dispersion of food loss among millions of households,food processing plants , and food service locations
(3) individual consumers tastes, preferences,and food habits ( eg throwing out left over milk in a bowl of cereal ) : and (4) economic factors ( eg cost to recover and redirect uneaten food to another use )
Future of food - An initial perspective by Prof. Wayne Bryden, Foundation C...Future Agenda
An initial perspective on the future of food by Prof. Wayne Bryden, Foundation Chair in Animal Science at the University of Queensland. This is the starting point for the global future agenda discussions taking place through 2015 as part of the futureagenda2.0 programme. www.futureagenda.org
The Market for Sustainable Meat Alternatives and the $38 Billion Subsidy of ...New Food Innovation Ltd
This is a review of the Meat alternatives market , One of the Interesting points from the review ;-
The US government spends $38 Billion each year to subsidise the meat and dairy industries , but only 0.04 % of this on Fruit and Vegetables . A $5 Big Mac would cost $13 if retail price included the hidden expenses that the meat offloads onto society . A pound of Hamburger will cost $30 without government subsidies
2019 Global Food Policy Report and 2019 EAT-Lancet Report
Co-Organized by Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Netherlands and IFPRI
JUN 4, 2019 - 02:30 PM TO 05:00 PM CEST
EAT LESS MEAT -Analysis and valuation of the health and Climate Change co ben...New Food Innovation Ltd
Millions of lives and trillions of dollars could be saved if people the world over ate more fruits and vegetables and less red meat, according to a new study. Such a shift in global eating patterns would also reduce the planetary burden of greenhouse gas emissions and help halt the worst effects of climate change.
The report, published Monday in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, argues that food-related emissions could fall between 29 and 70 percent by 2050 were the world’s population to adhere to certain dietary guidelines established by global health agencies. Global mortality could drop by as much as 10 percent — preventing as many as 8.1 million deaths per year — and between $1 trillion and $31 trillion could be saved.
Reducing meat consumption can benefit China from a health resource , climate and geopolitical perspective.Over 50% of the population is suffering from environmental-related illnesses many of which are made worse by higher meat consumption , such as heart disease , obesity , cancer and diabetes , China having 20% of population but 33% of the worlds diabetics - Child obesity has quadrupled in a single generation . The rising health care costs associated with these emerging crisis will be significant
Food systems, food security and environmental changeIIED
This is a presentation given by Dr John Ingram of Oxford University's Environmental Change Institute (ECI) to a Critical Theme organised by the International Institute for Environment and Development on 12 February 2015.
Dr Ingram leads the Environmental Change Institute's Food Systems Research and Training Programme, which aims to increase understanding of the interactions between food security and environmental change. The programme's research products have been adopted by national and international organisations, including the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), and the UK and Dutch governments.
In his presentation, Ingram looked at food system activities and 'planetary boundaries' – the safe operating space for humanity with respect to the earth's biophysical systems. If these planetary boundaries are crossed, then important subsystems, such as a monsoon system, could shift into a new state. Such shifts could have damaging consequences, including undermining the environmental conditions and the natural resource base on which our food security depends.
IIED hosts Critical Themes meetings to explore new ideas, introduce new research and broaden the knowledge of its staff.
More details: bit.ly/1CkRJ9K.
The way we eat has a massive impact on the planet. Food production as A huge scale cause many problem to environment and ecosystem, that changing what we consume really can help cut greenhouse gas emissions and limit damage to vulnerable species and environments.
Food security,Management of Food security science book
Food security.Factors enhance and decrease the food security. Food security Management processes. helpful to understand the basic concept and factors effecting the food security.
The sharp divide: Do we need animals to feed this world safely, well, sustain...ILRI
Presentation by ILRI and Cornell University on materials from a Café at the 2nd International Conference on Global Food Security, Ithaca, USA, 13 October 2015
Suvi Virtanen: Transformation of Food System for Better HealthTHL
Suvi Virtanen, Research Professor, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, at Europe That Protects - Safeguarding Our Planet, Safeguarding Our Health EU side event, 3-4 Dec 2019, THL, Helsinki
Let them eat meat? A solution or or a problem for a sustainable healthy future?ILRI
Presented by Lawrence Haddad (Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition) at the International Tropical Agriculture Conference, Brisbane, Australia, 11−13 November 2019
EAT LESS MEAT -Analysis and valuation of the health and Climate Change co ben...New Food Innovation Ltd
Millions of lives and trillions of dollars could be saved if people the world over ate more fruits and vegetables and less red meat, according to a new study. Such a shift in global eating patterns would also reduce the planetary burden of greenhouse gas emissions and help halt the worst effects of climate change.
The report, published Monday in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, argues that food-related emissions could fall between 29 and 70 percent by 2050 were the world’s population to adhere to certain dietary guidelines established by global health agencies. Global mortality could drop by as much as 10 percent — preventing as many as 8.1 million deaths per year — and between $1 trillion and $31 trillion could be saved.
Reducing meat consumption can benefit China from a health resource , climate and geopolitical perspective.Over 50% of the population is suffering from environmental-related illnesses many of which are made worse by higher meat consumption , such as heart disease , obesity , cancer and diabetes , China having 20% of population but 33% of the worlds diabetics - Child obesity has quadrupled in a single generation . The rising health care costs associated with these emerging crisis will be significant
Food systems, food security and environmental changeIIED
This is a presentation given by Dr John Ingram of Oxford University's Environmental Change Institute (ECI) to a Critical Theme organised by the International Institute for Environment and Development on 12 February 2015.
Dr Ingram leads the Environmental Change Institute's Food Systems Research and Training Programme, which aims to increase understanding of the interactions between food security and environmental change. The programme's research products have been adopted by national and international organisations, including the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), and the UK and Dutch governments.
In his presentation, Ingram looked at food system activities and 'planetary boundaries' – the safe operating space for humanity with respect to the earth's biophysical systems. If these planetary boundaries are crossed, then important subsystems, such as a monsoon system, could shift into a new state. Such shifts could have damaging consequences, including undermining the environmental conditions and the natural resource base on which our food security depends.
IIED hosts Critical Themes meetings to explore new ideas, introduce new research and broaden the knowledge of its staff.
More details: bit.ly/1CkRJ9K.
The way we eat has a massive impact on the planet. Food production as A huge scale cause many problem to environment and ecosystem, that changing what we consume really can help cut greenhouse gas emissions and limit damage to vulnerable species and environments.
Food security,Management of Food security science book
Food security.Factors enhance and decrease the food security. Food security Management processes. helpful to understand the basic concept and factors effecting the food security.
The sharp divide: Do we need animals to feed this world safely, well, sustain...ILRI
Presentation by ILRI and Cornell University on materials from a Café at the 2nd International Conference on Global Food Security, Ithaca, USA, 13 October 2015
Suvi Virtanen: Transformation of Food System for Better HealthTHL
Suvi Virtanen, Research Professor, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, at Europe That Protects - Safeguarding Our Planet, Safeguarding Our Health EU side event, 3-4 Dec 2019, THL, Helsinki
Let them eat meat? A solution or or a problem for a sustainable healthy future?ILRI
Presented by Lawrence Haddad (Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition) at the International Tropical Agriculture Conference, Brisbane, Australia, 11−13 November 2019
This program investigates the impact of food waste on the people and environment in which we live. Reducing food waste has been an emerging topic of discussion in the world because of its great potential to reduce the burden on the environment, save valuable nutrients that could be nourishing people and save money. This lesson focuses on practical and realistic approaches to reduce food waste at the household level.
Pros and Cons of Being a VegetarianVegetarians are defined as th.docxamrit47
Pros and Cons of Being a Vegetarian
Vegetarians are defined as those who do not eat poultry, fish and meat. Strict vegetarians or vegans exclude all animal products from their daily meals, such as honey, eggs, milk, wool and cheese (Craig 2009). Vegetarianism, the theory and practice adopted by vegetarians, can be traced back to the ancient Greece and ancient India, which stemmed from the philosophy of non-violence towards animals voluntarily (Craig 2009). Currently, over 1.4% of the American population has adopted the vegetarian lifestyle, and vegan diets have become increasingly popular among youth and teenagers. However, with the improvement of the quality of life, people more and more care about their healthy diet; the society is filled with supportive voices and protesting voices towards vegetarianism, especially when relevant to human health and the environmental sustainability.
Choosing a vegetarian diet could result in lack of vitamins and cholesterol, and develop diseases. People protesting the idea of following a vegetarian lifestyle and excluding meat, poultry and fish from diets (even all animal products) believe that this is a dangerous move that can easily trigger imbalanced nutritional intakes and the consequential damage of health. In the vegetarian lifestyle, diets are plant-based. Inappropriate and unwise selection of vegetarian diets are associated with many problems and risks. The most reported problem is the insufficient intakes of vitamin D, protein, calcium, iron, long-chain n–3 fatty acids, eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid and so on. Among them, Craig (2009) pointed out that vegetarians sometimes lack DHA and EPA that are important for “cardiovascular health as well as eye and brain functions”. Key, Appleby & Rosell (2006) investigated the cholesterol level of 5000 vegetarians and found that compared with non-vegetarians, they had low cholesterol level, lower than the recommended level of 200 by the American Heart Association. Schatz et al. (2001) also studied on the cholesterol levels of over 3000 male subjects aged 71-93 years, showing that the group with low cholesterol levels below 200 had significantly higher level of mortality. They further pointed out that extremely low cholesterol levels may lead to an early death. This reflected the risks of following vegetarian or vegan diets. Moreover, it is also reported that vegetarians have higher incidence rate of colorectal cancer than non-vegetarians by 39%, and have higher incidence rate of lower bone mineral density disease (Schatz et al. 2001). Vegetarians are also exposed to threats of insufficient metabolism and arteriosclerosis (Li 2011). All these side effects of a vegetarian lifestyle are preventing people from supporting vegetarians.
It looks like there are some disadvantages of being vegetarian, however, non-vegetarian group threated form health problem, high cholesterol and overweight and other diseases. If vegetarians follow correct and reco ...
Why animal source foods need to be part of the global food security and nutri...ILRI
Presented by Lawrence Haddad (Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition) at the International Tropical Agriculture Conference, Brisbane, Australia, 11−13 November 2019
This is a blog written by Richard Battista about how America wastes so much food. This happens mainly in restaurants. Chefs create portions for one individual that could feed at least two. The extra food usually gets thrown out. It is such a shame that there are people starving in other countries AND in our own. The extra food should be distributed to the hungry. Richard Battista stresses the importance of Chefs and Restaurants being aware of portion sizes and preserving excess food for those who actuallty need it.
Diet and Nutrition - Prevention of Chronic DiseasesGreenFacts
As a result of changes in the way we eat and live, some chronic diseases are increasingly affecting both developed and developing countries. Indeed, diet-related chronic diseases - such as obesity, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, cancer, dental disease, and osteoporosis - are the most common cause of death in the world and present a great burden for society.
How can improvements in terms of diet and physical activity help us reduce the risk of these chronic diseases?
In a nation known the world over for its livestock production and meatfilled
barbeques, millions of Australians are reducing their meat intake and
interest in plant-based alternatives is gaining considerable momentum.
Drawing on nationally representative market research conducted by
Colmar Brunton, this report serves to provide some key insights into
Australian consumers’ evolving relationship with meat. Whose choices
are changing and why, and what’s driving interest in plant-based meat
alternatives?
Read on to discover what really matters to Australians when they head
to the grocery store or sit down to a meal with friends and family.
The Foodservice business in the UK accepting the Sustainable Restaurant association challenge to implement and achieve the targets outlined in this report : To reduce the meals they serve by reducing the volume of meat on the menu, food in the bin and single use plastic and packaging in their operations
Seperation Technologies and Design of Complex Food Systems
September 12th -14th 2018 : Sponsored by the Research Foundation for Dairy Sciences Technical University of Munich @UlrichKolozik
Taste sensors imitate this taste reception mechanism through artificial lipid membranes reacting to taste molecules similarly than the tongue, allowing them to sense “taste
In order to match a market leader product, product development can be achieved through formulation of coffee blends. The Insent TS-5000Z Electronic Tongue was used to evaluate the taste profile of a target product as well as cheaper roast coffees with various origins and taste profiles.
Brief summary of the Junior consultants initiative, a well established program for internships in the UK . Providing opportunities for European and International students doing Food Science and Engineers studies, whilst supporting Uk food industry solve technical and innovation challenges
FODMAPS, Put simply, FODMAPs are a collection of short-chain carbohydrates (sugars) that aren’t absorbed properly in the gut, which can trigger symptoms in people with IBS. FODMAPs are found naturally in many foods and food additives.
Quote from the Introduction from the Global Nutrition report
"This year’s Global Nutrition Report focuses on the interdependence of the SDGs, and how progress against one goal generates progress for all. Nowhere are these linkages more evident than in the food agenda. As the producers, manufacturers and retailers of most of the world’s food, business has a responsibility to help drive the food system transformation. As a progressive food company, we are
committed to helping redesign our global food and agriculture system, to give everyone access to healthy and nutritious food and diets and thereby create a brighter future for all.
This investigation implicated raw flour as a source of an outbreak of STEC infections. Although it is low-moisture food, raw flour can be a vehicle of foodborne pathogens
The African Union in 2014 is a commitment from countries across Africa to ending hunger in the continent by 2025. Along with the other goals dealing with growth, public investment, nutrition, gender, trade, climate smart agriculture, youth and employment,
Transform Our Food Systems to Transform Our World
> Promote innovative approaches that are people-centered, eco- nomically viable, and sustainable to make farming part of the solution to climate change.
INTRODUCTION- Just In case you missed this when i first posted
There is an escalating crisis in food and farming systems. Industrial food production is damaging the environment, degrading natural resources and contributing to soaring levels of diet-related ill health. We urgently need to tackle this issue before the problem becomes even worse. But how do we go about this? And what is preventing society from doing more to change these harmful practices?
Arguably, the biggest barrier to making food and farming more sustainable is the distorted economic system which takes account of the direct costs of production, such as land, feed, seeds, labor and farming equipment, but fails to include the many externalized costs including pollution, biodiversity, social, cultural and welfare impacts. This system results in a situation where food produced intensively appears to be cheaper to consumers and more profitable to producers than food produced in a more sustainable way.
However, the external costs of this system are ultimately paid for by consumers, either individually or as part of society, even though they rarely realize this.
Consumer research shows that up to 40% of meat eaters are looking to reduce their meat consumption. Increasingly we hear consumers referencing sustainability as a driver of this. Companies, schools and restaurants are continually asking us for help in replacing meat on their menus.
In ‘The Future of Food’ review (pages 6-11) we highlight three global issues:
1. An unsustainable increase in demand for meat as populations grow in number and wealth.
2. Significant environmental impacts from the production of meat – at least 14% of Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions coming from livestock1
3. Major health issues associated with over consumption of meat – heart disease, Type 2 Diabetes and obesity are now of serious concern in most developed economies.
This report provides a reminder of these issues and how Quorn can play a part in resolving the problems. In addition to the clear environmental benefits compared with animal-based protein, we also continue to seek to improve the sustainability of what we do. 2016 saw us invest in many initiatives which are highlighted in the report and we are continuing to do so in 2017.
Institute of Brewing and Distilling - Sensory-and-Consumer-science-masterclas...New Food Innovation Ltd
Not withstanding the sophistication of modern production, distribution and retail operations, assessment of product flavour quality, both in-process and in final package, remains as important today as it has ever been.
Sensory and consumer sciences tools are essential in the production of high quality foods and beverages. In today’s competitive marketplace, the ability to describe the flavour of products in objective terms, why/why not consumers like them and to check their conformance with pre-defined quality standards is increasingly critical to commercial success.
Roti Bank Hyderabad: A Beacon of Hope and NourishmentRoti Bank
One of the top cities of India, Hyderabad is the capital of Telangana and home to some of the biggest companies. But the other aspect of the city is a huge chunk of population that is even deprived of the food and shelter. There are many people in Hyderabad that are not having access to
At Taste Of Middle East, we believe that food is not just about satisfying hunger, it's about experiencing different cultures and traditions. Our restaurant concept is based on selecting famous dishes from Iran, Turkey, Afghanistan, and other Arabic countries to give our customers an authentic taste of the Middle East
Ang Chong Yi Navigating Singaporean Flavors: A Journey from Cultural Heritage...Ang Chong Yi
In the heart of Singapore, where tradition meets modernity, He embarks on a culinary adventure that transcends borders. His mission? Ang Chong Yi Exploring the Cultural Heritage and Identity in Singaporean Cuisine. To explore the rich tapestry of flavours that define Singaporean cuisine while embracing innovative plant-based approaches. Join us as we follow his footsteps through bustling markets, hidden hawker stalls, and vibrant street corners.
Ang Chong Yi Navigating Singaporean Flavors: A Journey from Cultural Heritage...
Yale Program : Climate change american diet
1.
2.
3. Climate Change and the American Diet
1
Table of Contents
Introduction...................................................................................................................................................2
Executive Summary.......................................................................................................................................3
1. Food Choices and Eating Habits...............................................................................................................6
2. Motivations for Purchasing and Eating Plant-Based Foods.......................................................................8
3. Barriers to Purchasing and Eating Plant-Based Foods...............................................................................9
4. Willingness to Make Dietary Changes....................................................................................................12
5. Awareness of Food's Connection to Global Warming.............................................................................14
6. Food-Related Choices and Actions.........................................................................................................17
7. Global Warming Beliefs and Food-Related Intentions and Actions ........................................................21
Appendix I: Data Tables ..............................................................................................................................24
Appendix II: Survey Method........................................................................................................................38
Appendix III: Sample Demographics ...........................................................................................................39
4. Climate Change and the American Diet
2
Introduction
This report is based on findings from a nationally representative survey conducted by the Yale Program on
Climate Change Communication (climatecommunication.yale.edu) and Earth Day Network (earthday.org).
Interview dates: December 6 – 11, 2019. Interviews: 1,043 Adults (18+) in the U.S. Average margin of error
+/- 3 percentage points at the 95% confidence level. The research was funded by Earth Day Network as part
of its Foodprints for the Future campaign.
Principal Investigators:
Anthony Leiserowitz, PhD
Yale Program on Climate Change Communication
anthony.leiserowitz@yale.edu
Matthew Ballew, PhD
Yale Program on Climate Change Communication
matthew.ballew@yale.edu
Seth Rosenthal, PhD
Yale Program on Climate Change Communication
seth.rosenthal@yale.edu
Jillian Semaan
Earth Day Network
semaan@earthday.org
Cite as:
Leiserowitz, A., Ballew, M., Rosenthal S., & Semaan, J. (2020). Climate change and the American diet.
Yale University and Earth Day Network. New Haven, CT: Yale Program on Climate Change
Communication.
5. Climate Change and the American Diet
3
Executive Summary
Food production is among the leading sources of the greenhouse gas emissions that cause global warming. Food
production generates up to 30% of total global emissions1,2
and is also a significant contributor to biodiversity
loss, deforestation, freshwater use, and land use change.3
The production of livestock generates the highest
levels of greenhouse gas emissions, whereas the production of fruit and vegetables generates the lowest levels.4
Globally, changes to food production and consumption, including reducing food waste and shifting to a more
plant-based diet,5
are critical to reducing global warming and other environmental impacts.3
Although a majority of Americans do not consider themselves to be vegetarians or vegans, most
Americans are willing to eat more plant-based foods, and more than half are willing to eat less red meat.
• While only 4% of Americans say they are either vegan (1%) or vegetarian (3%), the vast majority (94%)
say they are willing to eat more fruit and vegetables, with six in ten (62%) saying they are "very"
willing.
• More than half of Americans (55%) say they are willing to eat more plant-based meat alternatives
(products made with vegetables such as soy, potatoes, peas, etc.). About the same percentage (54%) say
they are willing to eat less red meat (beef, lamb, pork). Nearly half (46%) say they are willing to use
dairy alternatives (soy milk, almond milk, etc.) instead of dairy-based milk or cream. One in four
Americans (26%) say they are willing to eat lab-grown meat rather than meat from animals.
• One in five Americans use plant-based dairy alternatives either about two to five times per week (10%)
or more often (10%). About one in ten eat plant-based meat alternatives about two to five times per
week (6%) or more often (3%).
Cost, taste, and convenience can be motivators or barriers to purchasing or eating plant-based foods.
• About half of Americans (49%) think a meal with a plant-based main course (fruit, vegetables,
meat/dairy alternatives) is more expensive than a meat-based main course (beef, chicken, fish, etc.),
while fewer think a plant-based main course is less expensive (14%).
• More than half of Americans (58%) say that it costs too much to buy plant-based foods, but 63% say
they would be willing to eat more plant-based foods instead of meat if plant-based foods cost less than
meat options.
• More than four in ten Americans (44%) say they don't like the taste of plant-based foods. However, two
in three (67%) say they would be willing to eat more plant-based foods instead of meat if plant-based
foods tasted better than they do today.
• About three out of four Americans (77%) say that ease and speed of preparation is at least "moderately"
important to them when choosing to purchase or eat plant-based foods, and 44% say it's too much of an
effort to buy plant-based foods.
• Nearly two-thirds of Americans (64%) say nobody has ever asked them to eat more plant-based foods.
About half (51%) say they would be willing to eat more plant-based foods if they had more information
about the environmental impact of different products and/or foods, and/or if their family and friends ate
more plant-based foods instead of meat (50%).
6. Climate Change and the American Diet
4
Health is the top motivation for purchasing or eating plant-based foods, and a majority of Americans say
environmental impacts are personally important.
• When asked about reasons (i.e., motivations) for purchasing or eating plant-based foods (fruit,
vegetables, meat/dairy alternatives), majorities of Americans say the following are at least "moderately"
important to them: their health (91%), how food companies affect the environment (71%), and/or
helping to reduce global warming (64%).
• About one in four Americans (27%) say they have rewarded food companies that are taking steps to
reduce their impact on the environment by buying their products at least once in the last 12 months.
• About one in five Americans (21%) say they have punished food companies that are not taking steps to
reduce their impact on the environment by not buying their products over the last 12 months.
Lower-income Americans are more likely than middle- and higher-income Americans to say they lack
access to nearby grocery stores and/or fresh produce.
• Lower-income Americans (households earning less than $50,000 annually) are more likely to say they
lack access to a nearby grocery store/market (20%) compared to middle- (11%) and higher-income (9%)
Americans.
• About one in seven lower-income Americans (14%) say they lack access to fresh produce (fruit,
vegetables) compared to 6% of middle- and 6% of higher-income Americans. More than half of lower-
income Americans (53%) say it is too much of an effort to buy plant-based foods (vs. 45% of middle-
and 37% of higher-income Americans), and 71% say it costs too much to buy plant-based foods (vs.
59% of middle- and 46% of higher-income Americans).
Although most Americans think that the production of meat contributes at least "a little" to global
warming, many do not make the connection between food and global warming.
• More than half of Americans think that the production of beef, pork, dairy, and/or poultry contribute to
global warming at least "a little," but only about one in four Americans (27%) think that beef contributes
"a lot." Fewer Americans think the production of dairy (17%) contributes "a lot" to global warming.
More than four in ten Americans think that beef does not contribute to global warming at all (23%) or do
not know (20%). Similarly, 23% think that dairy products do not contribute to global warming at all and
23% do not know.
• Although most Americans think that if everyone ate a more plant-based diet it would reduce global
warming at least "a little," more than four in ten Americans say it would not reduce global warming at
all (23%) or do not know (19%).
• Three in ten Americans say they hear about the impact of food choices on global warming in the media
either "at least once a month" (16%) or "at least once a week" (13%), while four in ten say they hear
about it "once a year or less often" (11%) or "never" (29%).
• Most Americans say they "rarely" or "never" look for information about the environmental impact of
different products and/or foods (65%), or talk to family and friends about the environmental impact of
different products and/or foods (70%).
7. Climate Change and the American Diet
5
Although most Americans think reducing food waste and/or composting would reduce global warming at
least "a little," many engage in food waste behavior, and most do not compost food waste.
• More than six in ten Americans think that if everyone threw away less food and/or composted food
waste, it would reduce global warming at least "a little."
• About three in four Americans throw out uneaten or spoiled food "sometimes" (42%), "often" (24%), or
"always" (10%) because they no longer want it or it went bad, while only about one in four say they do
so "rarely" (21%) or "never" (2%).
• A majority of Americans say they "rarely" (16%) or "never" (56%) compost food waste, while only
about three in ten Americans compost food waste "sometimes" (14%), "often" (9%) or "always" (6%).
Americans who are among the "Alarmed" or "Concerned" in Global Warming's Six Americas6
are more
willing than other Americans to adopt a more plant-based diet and engage in pro-climate food behaviors.
The Alarmed are the most willing and most engaged.
• More than six in ten of the Alarmed are willing to eat more plant-based meat alternatives (77% vs. 55%
of the Concerned and 39% of all other Americans), eat less red meat (66% vs. 61% of the Concerned
and 42% of all others), and/or use dairy alternatives instead of dairy-based milk or cream (63% vs. 47%
of the Concerned and 33% of all others). About half of the Alarmed (49%) and Concerned (49%) are
willing to eat less dairy (vs. 32% of all other Americans).
• More than half of the Alarmed look for information (57%) and/or talk to family and friends about the
environmental impact of different products and/or foods (55%) at least "sometimes." In contrast, only
34% of the Concerned and 20% of all other Americans look for information about environmental
impacts, and even fewer talk to family and friends about the issue at least "sometimes" (25% of the
Concerned and 15% of all others).
• About half (52%) of the Alarmed have rewarded food companies that are taking steps to reduce their
impact on the environment by buying their products at least once in the last year, compared to 22% of
the Concerned and 13% of all other Americans.
1
https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/02/ipcc_wg3_ar5_chapter11.pdf
2
Vermeulen, S. J., Campbell, B. M., & Ingram, J. S. (2012). Climate change and food systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 37,
195-222. doi: 10.1146/annurev-environ-020411-130608
3
Willett, W., Rockström, J., Loken, B., Springmann, M., Lang, T., Vermeulen, S., ... & Jonell, M. (2019). Food in the Anthropocene: The EAT–
Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. The Lancet, 393(10170), 447-492. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31788-4
4
Poore, J., & Nemecek, T. (2018). Reducing food's environmental impacts through producers and consumers. Science, 360(6392), 987-992. doi:
10.1126/science.aaq0216
5
https://www.drawdown.org/solutions/food
6
https://climatecommunication.yale.edu/about/projects/global-warmings-six-americas/
8. Climate Change and the American Diet
6
1. Food Choices and Eating Habits
1.1. About half of Americans eat vegetables, grains, and/or dairy almost every day or more frequently.
Americans, on average, report that they eat vegetables, grains, dairy, and fruit more frequently than they eat
meat. Specifically, 53% of Americans say they eat vegetables almost every day or more frequently, and 48%
say they eat grains (bread, pasta, rice, etc.) and/or dairy products (milk, cheese, etc.) at those rates. Forty-one
percent of Americans say they eat fruit almost every day or more frequently.
In contrast, 13% of Americans say they eat eggs almost every day or more frequently, with an additional 38%
eating eggs two to five times per week. Similarly, 12% of Americans eat poultry (chicken, turkey, etc.) almost
every day or more frequently, with an additional 56% eating it two to five times per week. Eight percent of
Americans say they eat beef (steak, ground beef, etc.) almost every day or more frequently and an additional
33% eat beef two to five times per week.
Fewer Americans eat plant-based meat/dairy alternatives. Ten percent of Americans use plant-based dairy
alternatives (soy milk, almond milk, etc.) every day or more frequently, with an additional 10% using them two
to five times per week. Only 3% of Americans eat plant-based meat alternatives (products made with soy,
potatoes, peas, etc.) every day or more frequently, with an additional 6% eating them two to five times per
week. Majorities of Americans say they "never or almost never" eat tofu (82%), plant-based meat alternatives
(72%), or use plant-based dairy alternatives (59%).
Most Americans (81%) say they prefer meals with meat (beef, chicken, fish, etc.) and/or dairy, and 4% of
Americans describe themselves as either "vegetarian" (3%) or "vegan" (1%; see Appendix I, p. 25).
1
3
10
2
4
8
13
12
41
48
48
53
1
2
6
10
17
22
33
38
56
34
32
33
35
1
3
7
6
25
33
30
25
23
14
10
11
6
18
12
11
15
40
29
21
17
7
9
6
5
5
80
82
72
59
16
12
8
6
3
2
5
3
2
0% 50% 100%
Lamb
Tofu
Plant-based meat alternatives
Plant-based dairy alternatives
Fish or seafood
Pork
Beef
Eggs
Poultry
Fruit
Dairy products
Grains
Vegetables
Every day or almost every day / More than once a day About 2 to 5 times per week
About once a week Less than once a week
Never or almost never
About how often do you eat the following:
December 2019. Base: 1,043 U.S. adults.
About half of Americans eat vegetables, grains, and/or dairy almost every day or more frequently
9. Climate Change and the American Diet
7
1.2. American most frequently eat home-cooked dinners.
Most Americans say they eat dinner that they or someone in their household prepared and cooked at home
(excluding pre-made and frozen meals) either every day or almost every day (43%) or about two to five times
per week (41%). Fewer say they eat fast food for dinner two to five times per week or more frequently (11%) or
eat out for dinner at a restaurant (other than fast food) at that frequency (10%).
Few Americans say they frequently order take-out for dinner through food delivery apps (DoorDash, Uber Eats,
etc.) or delivery services provided by restaurants, or eat dinner at home prepared with ingredients supplied by
food delivery services (Blue Apron, Home Chef, etc.).
2
1
43
3
2
10
10
41
2
7
23
28
7
4
18
36
46
6
90
73
30
17
4
0% 50% 100%
Eat dinner at home which have ingredients supplied by
food delivery services
Order take-out for dinner through food delivery apps or
delivery services provided by restaurants
Eat fast food for dinner
Eat dinner at a restaurant
Eat dinner at home that you or someone in your
household prepared and cooked
Every day or almost every day About 2 to 5 times per week About once a week
Less than once a week Never or almost never
About how often do you do the following:
December 2019. Base: 1,043 U.S. adults.
Americans most frequently eat home-cooked dinners
Eat dinner at home that you or someone in your
household prepared and cooked
Order take-out for dinner through food delivery apps
or delivery services provided by restaurants
Eat dinner at home which has ingredients supplied
by food delivery services
10. Climate Change and the American Diet
8
2. Motivations for Purchasing and Eating Plant-Based Foods
2.1. Health, taste, convenience, and price are most important to Americans when choosing to purchase
or eat plant-based foods.
When asked about reasons (i.e., "motivations") for purchasing or eating plant-based foods (fruit, vegetables,
meat/dairy alternatives), Americans generally indicate that individual motivations, including health, taste,
convenience, and price, are more important to them than environmental motivations such as the environmental
impacts of food products.
Nine in ten Americans (91%) say their health is at least a "moderately" important reason to purchase or eat
plant-based foods, and about eight in ten (83%) say that taste is at least moderately important. Other reasons
that are at least moderately important include how quick or easy plant-based foods are to prepare (77%), the
price of plant-based food (75%), how food companies affect the environment (71%), helping to reduce global
warming (64%), and protecting animals (64%). Only about one in four Americans (27%) say that what other
people (family, friends) think is at least moderately important when they choose to purchase or eat plant-based
foods.
4
15
14
14
15
10
26
33
8
19
23
25
32
31
41
40
15
30
27
31
28
36
16
19
0 50 100
What other people (family, friends) think
Protecting animals
Helping to reduce global warming
How food companies affect the environment
The price of the plant-based food
How quick or easy it is to prepare
The taste of the plant-based food
Your health
Extremely important Very important Moderately important
How important are each of the following to you personally, if at all, when you choose to purchase
or eat plant-based foods (fruit, vegetables, meat/dairy alternatives)?
December 2019. Base: 1,043 U.S. adults.
Health, taste, convenience, and price are most important to Americans when choosing to
purchase or eat plant-based foods
– A majority of Americans say helping to reduce global warming is personally important to them –
Respondents (n = 1) who said they “never or almost never” eat vegetables,
fruit, plant-based dairy alternatives, plant-based dairy alternatives, plant-
based meat alternatives, tofu, and grains did not receive these questions.
91
83
77
75
71
64
27
64
100%50%0%
11. Climate Change and the American Diet
9
3. Barriers to Purchasing and Eating Plant-Based Foods
3.1. Americans face several barriers to purchasing or eating plant-based foods.
Many Americans face barriers to purchasing or eating plant-based foods, including structural, financial,
informational, or psychological barriers. About one in eight Americans (13%) say they don't have a grocery
store/market close to where they live, and 9% say they don't have access to fresh produce (fruit, vegetables).
Other barriers are more common. Nearly two-thirds of Americans (64%) say nobody has ever asked them to
eat more plant-based foods, and more than half say that it costs too much to buy plant-based foods (58%)
and/or that they don't know what plant-based foods to buy (53%).
Additionally, four in ten or more Americans say they don't know how to cook with plant-based foods (47%),
that it's too much of an effort to buy plant-based foods (44%), that it has never occurred to them to eat more
plant-based foods (44%), that they don't like the taste of plant-based foods (44%), and/or that there are
traditions or celebrations in their culture/heritage in which eating meat plays an important role (42%). Nearly
four in ten say they don't think it is important to eat plant-based foods (38%), and 34% say they don't have
enough time to cook with plant-based foods.
2
4
8
12
15
8
13
8
16
15
15
31
7
9
25
26
27
36
31
37
31
38
43
34
0 50 100
I don’t have access to fresh produce (fruit, vegetables)
I don’t have a grocery store/market close to where I live
I don’t have enough time to cook with plant-based foods
I don’t think it’s important to eat plant-based foods
There are traditions or celebrations in my culture/heritage
I don’t like the taste of plant-based foods
It has never occurred to me to eat more plant-based foods
It’s too much of an effort to buy plant-based foods
I don’t know how to cook with plant-based foods
I don’t know what plant-based foods to buy
It costs too much to buy plant-based foods
Nobody has ever asked me to eat more plant-based foods
Strongly agree Somewhat agree
How strongly do you agree or disagree with each of the following statements regarding
purchasing or eating plant-based foods (fruit, vegetables, meat/dairy alternatives)?
December 2019. Base: 1,043 U.S. adults.
Americans face several barriers to purchasing or eating plant-based foods
– Nearly two-thirds say nobody has ever asked them to eat more plant-based foods –
There are traditions or celebrations in my culture/heritage in which
eating meat (beef, chicken, fish, etc.) plays an important role
Respondents (n = 13) who said they “never or almost never” eat beef, lamb,
pork, poultry, and fish/seafood did not receive these questions.
64
58
53
47
44
44
44
42
38
34
13
9
100%50%0%
12. Climate Change and the American Diet
10
3.2. Lower-income households face different barriers to purchasing or eating plant-based foods.
According to the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), about 11% of households in the U.S. were
food-insecure at least at some point during 2018, meaning that they were unable to access or were uncertain of
having enough food for a healthy diet for all household members.7
Lower-income households had higher rates
of food insecurity compared to the national average.
On average, Americans with an annual household income of less than $50,000 are more likely than are
Americans with higher household incomes to experience several barriers to purchasing or eating plant-based
foods. Lower-income Americans are more likely to say they lack access to a nearby grocery store/market (20%)
compared to middle- (11%) and higher-income Americans (9%). Lower-income Americans are also more likely
to say they lack access to fresh produce (14% vs. 6% of both middle- and higher-income Americans), that it is
too much of an effort to buy plant-based foods (53% vs. 45% of middle- and 37% of higher-income
Americans), and/or that it costs too much to buy plant-based foods (71% vs. 59% of middle- and 46% of higher-
income Americans).
A greater proportion of lower-income Americans also say they don't know what plant-based foods to buy (58%
vs. 55% of middle- and 46% of higher-income Americans), don't know how to cook with plant-based foods
(57% vs. 48% of middle- and 39% of higher-income Americans), and/or don't have enough time to cook with
plant-based foods (44% vs. 33% of middle- and 25% of higher-income Americans). About half of lower- (52%)
and middle-income (48%) Americans say it has never occurred to them to eat more plant-based foods,
compared to 34% of those with higher incomes.
7
https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/food-nutrition-assistance/food-security-in-the-us/key-statistics-graphics/
Annual Household Income
Percent who "somewhat" or "strongly" agree…
U.S. Population Less than $50k $50k - <$100k $100k or more
% % % %
Nobody has ever asked me to eat more plant-based foods 64 65 67 61
It costs too much to buy plant-based foods 58 71 59 46
I don’t know what plant-based foods to buy 53 58 55 46
I don’t know how to cook with plant-based foods 47 57 48 39
It’s too much of an effort to buy plant-based foods 44 53 45 37
It has never occurred to me to eat more plant-based foods 44 52 48 34
I don’t like the taste of plant-based foods 44 44 45 43
There are traditions or celebrations in my culture/heritage in which
eating meat (beef, chicken, fish, etc.) plays an important role 42 44 40 40
I don’t think it’s important to eat plant-based foods 38 39 38 38
I don’t have enough time to cook with plant-based foods 34 44 33 25
I don’t have a grocery store/market close to where I live 13 20 11 9
I don’t have access to fresh produce (fruit, vegetables) 9 14 6 6
How strongly do you agree or disagree with each of the following statements regarding
purchasing or eating plant-based foods (fruit, vegetables, meat/dairy alternatives)?
December 2019. Base: 1,043 U.S. adults; Less than $50k (n = 281);
$50k - <$100k (n = 358); $100k or more (n = 404)
*Individuals with lower household income are significantly more likely to agree than are
individuals with higher household incomes (p < .001)
Lower-income households face different barriers to purchasing or eating plant-based foods
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
13. Climate Change and the American Diet
11
3.3. About half of Americans think a meal with a plant-based main course is more expensive than a meal
with a meat-based main course.
According to the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), the estimated price of foods depends on
how cost is measured, such as the price per calorie or price per edible weight.8
When measured by the edible
weight or average portion size of the food, on average, fruit, vegetables, and grains are less expensive than most
meat-based foods (e.g., beef, pork, chicken).
About half of Americans (49%) think a meal with a plant-based main course (fruit, vegetables, meat/dairy
alternatives) is more expensive than a meal with a meat-based main course (beef, chicken, fish, etc.). In
contrast, only about one in seven Americans (14%) think a meal with a plant-based main course is less
expensive than a meal with a meat-based main course. About one in five Americans (22%) think the two cost
about the same, and 15% say they don't know.
About half of lower-income Americans (earning a household income of less than $50,000 annually) and middle-
income Americans (earning between $50,000 and $99,999) think a meal with a plant-based main course is more
expensive than a meal with a meat-based main course (53% and 52%, respectively), while higher-income
Americans (earning more than $100,000) are less likely to think so (42%; see Appendix I, p. 30).
8
https://www.ers.usda.gov/webdocs/publications/44678/19980_eib96.pdf?v=42321
About half of Americans think a meal with a plant-based main course is more expensive
than a meal with a meat-based main course
Less expensive
(14%)
Same cost
(22%)
Don’t know
(15%)
Do you think a meal with a plant-based main course (fruit, vegetables,
meat/dairy alternatives) is more expensive, less expensive, or about the same
cost as a meal with a meat-based main course (beef, chicken, fish, etc.)?
December 2019. Base: 1,043 U.S. adults.
More expensive
(49%)
14. Climate Change and the American Diet
12
4. Willingness to Make Dietary Changes
4.1. Most Americans are willing to eat more plant-based foods, more plant-based meat alternatives,
and/or less red meat.
Although Americans report several barriers to purchasing and eating plant-based foods (see Section 3.1, above),
majorities of Americans say they are willing to make changes to their diets to increase their consumption of
plant-based foods and decrease their consumption of meat. More than nine in ten Americans (94%) say they are
willing to eat more fruit and vegetables, and six in ten (62%) say they are "very" willing to do so. More than
half of Americans (55%) say they are willing to eat more plant-based meat alternatives (products made with
vegetables such as soy, potatoes, peas, etc.) and 54% say they are willing to eat less red meat (beef, lamb, pork).
More than four in ten Americans say they are willing to use dairy alternatives (soy milk, almond milk, etc.)
instead of dairy-based milk or cream (46%) and/or to consume less dairy (42%).
One in four Americans (26%) say they are willing to eat lab-grown meat rather than meat taken from animals.
5
8
16
19
16
62
21
34
29
36
39
32
0 50 100
Eat meat that is grown from cell cultures in a laboratory
rather than taken from animals
Eat less dairy (milk, cheese)
Use dairy alternatives (soy milk, almond milk, etc.) instead
of dairy-based milk or cream
Eat less red meat (beef, lamb, pork)
Eat more plant-based meat alternatives (products made
with vegetables such as soy, potatoes, peas, etc.)
Eat more fruit and vegetables
Very willing Somewhat willing
How willing or unwilling would you be to do the following?
December 2019. Base: 1,043 U.S. adults.
Most Americans are willing to eat more plant-based foods, more plant-based meat alternatives,
and/or less red meat
– More than nine in ten Americans are willing to eat more fruit and vegetables –
94
55
54
46
42
26
Eat more plant-based meat alternatives (products made
with vegetables such as soy, potatoes, peas, etc.)
Use dairy alternatives (soy milk, almond milk, etc.)
instead of dairy-based milk or cream
Eat meat that is grown from cell cultures in a laboratory
rather than taken from animals
Respondents (n = 48) who said they “never or almost never” eat red meat
products (beef, lamb, and pork) did not receive the question about eating
less red meat, and respondents (n = 46) who said they “never or almost
never” eat dairy products did not receive the two questions about
using/eating less dairy.
% % %
15. Climate Change and the American Diet
13
4.2. A majority of Americans say they would be likely to eat more plant-based foods instead of meat if
plant-based foods tasted better, cost less than meat options, and/or were more accessible.
Two in three Americans (67%) say they would eat more plant-based foods (fruit, vegetables, meat/dairy
alternatives) instead of meat (beef, chicken, fish, etc.) if plant-based foods tasted better than they do today.
Additionally, about six in ten Americans say they would eat more plant-based foods instead of meat if plant-
based foods cost less than meat options (63%), if they had better access to fresh produce (62%), and/or if there
were more plant-based food options in stores (61%).
About half of Americans say they would eat more plant-based foods if they had more information about the
environmental impact of different products and/or foods (51%), and/or if their family and friends ate more
plant-based foods instead of meat (50%). More than four in ten Americans (44%) say they would eat more
plant-based foods if someone they like and respect asked them to, but only 13% say they would do so if a
celebrity or public figure (athlete, actor, singer, etc.) they like and respect asked Americans to.
3
10
18
18
25
32
33
29
10
34
32
33
36
30
30
38
0 50 100
If a celebrity or public figure (athlete, actor, singer, etc.) I
like and respect asked Americans to
If someone I like and respect asked me to
If my family and friends ate more plant-based foods instead
of meat
If I had more information about the environmental impact of
different products and/or foods
If there were more plant-based food options in stores
If I had better access to fresh produce (fruit, vegetables)
If plant-based foods cost less than meat options
If plant-based foods tasted better than they do today
Very likely Somewhat likely
How likely or unlikely is it that you would eat more plant-based foods (fruit, vegetables, meat/dairy
alternatives) instead of meat (beef, chicken, fish, etc.) if the following happened?
December 2019. Base: 1,043 U.S. adults.
A majority of Americans say they would be likely to eat more plant-based foods instead of meat
if plant-based foods tasted better, cost less than meat options, and/or were more accessible
Respondents (n = 13) who said they “never or almost never” eat beef, lamb,
pork, poultry, and fish/seafood did not receive these questions.
67
63
62
61
51
50
44
13
If I had more information about the environmental impact
of different products and/or foods
If my family and friends ate more plant-based foods
instead of meat
If a celebrity or public figure (athlete, actor, singer, etc.)
I like and respect asked Americans to
% % %
16. Climate Change and the American Diet
14
5. Awareness of Food's Connection to Global Warming
5.1. More than half of Americans think the production of beef, pork, dairy, and/or poultry contributes at
least a little to global warming.
Food production generates up to 30% of total greenhouse gas emissions globally.9,10
Food production is also a
significant contributor to biodiversity loss, deforestation, freshwater use, and land-use change.11
The production
of livestock primarily raised for beef and dairy generates the most greenhouse gas emissions compared to other
foods.10,11,12,13
According to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, the production of
livestock accounts for 14.5% of greenhouse gas emissions around the globe.12
The production of beef, lamb,
and dairy, as well as farm-raised crustaceans (e.g., shrimp, crab, lobster), tend to generate the highest
greenhouse gas emissions per gram of protein compared to other food products, including pork and poultry,
whereas plant-based foods (e.g., fruit, vegetables, nuts) tend to produce the lowest emissions.13
More than half of Americans think beef, pork, dairy, and/or poultry contribute at least "a little" to global
warming. However, only about one in four Americans (27%) think that the production of beef contributes "a lot"
to global warming, and one in five (20%) think the same about the production of pork. Fewer Americans think
the production of dairy (17%), poultry (14%), and/or farmed fish and seafood (12%) contribute "a lot" to global
warming. Americans are less likely to think that fruit and vegetables, and/or nuts contribute to global warming;
nearly four in ten Americans think fruit and vegetables (38%), and/or nuts (37%) do not contribute at all.
More than one in five Americans do not think that the production of meat (e.g., beef, pork, farmed fish and
seafood) and/or dairy contributes at all to global warming, and more than one in five, on average, do not know.
These results indicate that many Americans are unaware of agriculture's contribution to global warming.
9
https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/02/ipcc_wg3_ar5_chapter11.pdf
10
Vermeulen, S. J., Campbell, B. M., & Ingram, J. S. (2012). Climate change and food systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 37,
195-222. doi: 10.1146/annurev-environ-020411-130608
11
Willett, W., Rockström, J., Loken, B., Springmann, M., Lang, T., Vermeulen, S., ... & Jonell, M. (2019). Food in the Anthropocene: The EAT–
Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. The Lancet, 393(10170), 447-492. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31788-4
12
http://www.fao.org/3/i3437e/i3437e.pdf
13
Poore, J., & Nemecek, T. (2018). Reducing food's environmental impacts through producers and consumers. Science, 360(6392), 987-992. doi:
10.1126/science.aaq0216
7
7
12
14
17
20
27
15
15
18
24
23
22
19
17
19
17
15
14
13
11
24
20
24
22
23
21
20
37
38
28
24
23
23
23
0% 50% 100%
Nuts
Fruit and vegetables
Farmed fish and seafood
Poultry (chicken, turkey, etc.)
Dairy products (milk, cheese, etc.)
Pork (ham, bacon, sausage, etc.)
Beef (steak, ground beef, etc.)
A lot Some A little Don't know Not at all
How much do you think the production of the following foods contributes to global
warming, if at all?
December 2019. Base: 1,043 U.S. adults.
More than half of Americans think the production of beef, pork, dairy, and/or poultry contributes
at least a little to global warming
– But many think meat and/or dairy do not contribute to global warming at all or do not know –
17. Climate Change and the American Diet
15
5.2. Most Americans think that cooking over "clean cookstoves," reducing food waste, composting
food waste, and/or eating a more plant-based diet would reduce global warming at least a little.
Changing food production and consumption systems globally could greatly reduce their environmental impacts
and the emissions that cause global warming.14
Research finds that out of 80 global warming solutions,
decreasing food waste is ranked third, and shifting to a diet rich in plant-based foods ranks fourth.15
Compared
to other diets, vegetarian and vegan diets have been linked to the greatest reductions in greenhouse gas
emissions.16,17
Two other food-related behavioral solutions include cooking over "clean cookstoves" (e.g., solar-
powered, fuel-efficient, thermal-efficient; ranked 21st
) and composting food waste (ranked 60th
).15
Most Americans think that if everyone adopted these food-related behaviors it would reduce global warming at
least "a little." Americans are more likely to say that cooking over clean cookstoves would reduce global
warming compared to the other food-related solutions. One in five or fewer Americans think that everyone
reducing food waste (21%), eating a more plant-based diet (18%), composting food waste (18%), and/or buying
food that is grown or produced locally (17%) would reduce global warming "a lot." Fewer Americans (10%)
think that everyone buying organic food would reduce global warming "a lot," and 31% say it would not reduce
global warming at all.
Three in ten or more Americans say "not at all" or "don't know" regarding each of these solutions, suggesting
that many are unaware of the impact certain food-related actions, particularly reducing food waste and eating
more plant-based foods, can have on global warming.
14
Willett, W., Rockström, J., Loken, B., Springmann, M., Lang, T., Vermeulen, S., ... & Jonell, M. (2019). Food in the Anthropocene: The EAT–
Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. The Lancet, 393(10170), 447-492. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31788-4
15
https://www.drawdown.org/solutions/food
16
Peters, C. J., Picardy, J., Wilkins, J. L., Griffin, T. S., Fick, G. W., & Darrouzet-Nardi, A. F. (2016). Carrying capacity of US agricultural land: Ten
diet scenarios. Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene, 4(1), 1-15. doi: 10.12952/journal.elementa.000116
17
Tilman, D., & Clark, M. (2014). Global diets link environmental sustainability and human health. Nature, 515(7528), 518-522. doi:
10.1038/nature13959
10
17
18
18
21
23
22
29
25
27
24
28
17
16
15
18
17
18
19
17
19
16
16
14
31
21
23
21
21
16
0% 50% 100%
Bought organic food
Bought food that is grown or produced locally
Ate a more plant-based diet (fruit, vegetables, meat/dairy
alternatives)
Composted food waste
Threw away less food
Cooked over “clean cookstoves” (solar powered, fuel
efficient, thermal efficient)
A lot Some A little Don't know Not at all
If everyone did the following, how much do you think it would reduce global
warming, if at all?
December 2019. Base: 1,043 U.S. adults.
Most Americans think that cooking over “clean cookstoves,” reducing food waste, composting
food waste, and/or eating a more plant-based diet would reduce global warming at least a little
– Three in ten or more Americans say “not at all” or “don’t know” –
Cooked over “clean cookstoves” (solar-powered,
fuel-efficient, thermal-efficient)
Ate a more plant-based diet (fruit, vegetables,
meat/dairy alternatives)
18. Climate Change and the American Diet
16
5.3. Three in ten Americans say they hear about the impact of food choices on global warming in the
media once a month or more often.
Three in ten Americans say they hear about the impact of food choices on global warming in the media either
"at least once a month" (16%) or "at least once a week" (13%). About one in four Americans say they hear
about it in the media only "several times a year" (16%) or "once a year or less often" (11%), and 29% say they
"never" hear about it.
13 16 14 16 11 29
0% 50% 100%
At least once a week At least once a month Don’t know
Several times a year Once a year or less often Never
How often do you hear about the impact of food choices on global warming in
the media (TV, movies, radio, newspapers/news websites, magazines, etc.)?
December 2019. Base: 1,043 U.S. adults.
Three in ten Americans say they hear about the impact of food choices on global warming in the
media once a month or more often
– Nearly three in ten say they never hear about it –
Hear about the impact of
food choices on global
warming in the media
19. Climate Change and the American Diet
17
6. Food-Related Choices and Actions
6.1. About three in four Americans throw out uneaten or spoiled food because they no longer want it or it
went bad.
According to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, about one-third of the food
produced globally for human consumption is lost or wasted every year, accounting for 8% of global greenhouse
gas emissions related to human activity.18
Food loss refers to food that spills or spoils before it reaches the
consumer, and food waste refers to food that reaches retailers or the consumer but is not consumed. The United
States Department of Agriculture (USDA) estimates that food loss and waste account for 30% to 40% of the
U.S. food supply.19
About three in four Americans throw out uneaten or spoiled food "sometimes" (42%), "often" (24%), or
"always" (10%) because they no longer want it or it went bad. Only about one in four Americans say they do so
"rarely" (21%) or "never" (2%).
Nearly three in ten Americans compost food waste either "sometimes" (14%), "often" (9%) or "always" (6%).
However, a majority of Americans say they "rarely" (16%) or "never" (56%) compost food waste.
18
http://www.fao.org/save-food/resources/keyfindings/en/
19
https://www.usda.gov/foodwaste/faqs
6
10
9
24
14
42
16
21
56
2
0% 50% 100%
Always Often Sometimes Rarely Never
How often do you do the following things?
December 2019. Base: 1,043 U.S. adults.
About three in four Americans throw out uneaten or spoiled food because they no longer
want it or it went bad
– Most Americans rarely or never compost food waste –
Throw out uneaten or
spoiled food because you no
longer want it or it went bad
Compost food waste
20. Climate Change and the American Diet
18
6.2. Most Americans rarely or never look for information about the environmental impact of foods
and/or talk to family and friends about it.
About one in three Americans look for information about the environmental impact of different products and/or
foods either "sometimes" (24%), "often" (10%), or "always" (2%). However, most Americans say they do so
"rarely" (30%) or "never" (35%). Three in ten Americans talk to family and friends about the environmental
impact of different products and/or foods either "sometimes" (21%), "often" (8%), or "always" (1%), while
most Americans say they do so "rarely" (31%) or "never" (39%).
1
2
8
10
21
24
31
30
39
35
0% 50% 100%
Always Often Sometimes Rarely Never
How often do you do the following things?
December 2019. Base: 1,043 U.S. adults.
Most Americans rarely or never look for information about the environmental impact of foods
and/or talk to family and friends about it
Look for information about the
environmental impact of
different products and/or foods
Talk to family and friends about
the environmental impact of
different products and/or foods
21. Climate Change and the American Diet
19
6.3. Most Americans buy food grown or produced locally sometimes or more often.
Nearly one in three Americans say they buy food grown or produced locally either "often" (28%) or "always"
(4%) and an additional 46% of Americans say they do so "sometimes." About one in five Americans say they
either "rarely" (16%) or "never" (6%) buy locally sourced food.
4 28 46 16 6
0% 50% 100%
Buy food grown or
produced locally
Always Often Sometimes Rarely Never
How often do you do the following things?
December 2019. Base: 1,043 U.S. adults.
Most Americans buy food grown or produced locally sometimes or more often
Buy food grown
or produced locally
22. Climate Change and the American Diet
20
6.4. About one in four Americans have rewarded food companies for their environmental actions at least
once in the past year by buying their products.
About one in four Americans (27%) say they have rewarded food companies that are taking steps to reduce their
impact on the environment by buying their products at least once in the last 12 months. About one in five
Americans (21%) say they have punished food companies that are not taking steps to reduce their impact on the
environment by not buying their products. However, most Americans say they have "never" rewarded (62%) or
punished (69%) food companies for their environmental actions.
4
5
4
6
11
13
3
3
9
10
69
62
0% 50% 100%
Many times (6+) Several times (4-5) Sometimes (2-3) Once Don’t know Never
Over the past 12 months, how many times have you done the following?
December 2019. Base: 1,043 U.S. adults.
About one in four Americans have rewarded food companies for their environmental actions
at least once in the past year by buying their products
– Most say they have never rewarded or punished food companies for their environmental actions –
Rewarded food companies that
are taking steps to reduce their
impact on the environment by
buying their products
Punished food companies that
are not taking steps to reduce
their impact on the environment
by NOT buying their products
23. Climate Change and the American Diet
21
7. Global Warming Beliefs and Food-Related Intentions and Actions
7.1. Alarmed and Concerned Americans are more willing than other Americans to adopt a more plant-
based diet.
Prior research has found that Americans can be categorized into six distinct groups based on their climate
change beliefs, attitudes, and actions (Global Warming's Six Americas).20,21
Americans who are "Alarmed"
have the highest levels of acceptance and concern about global warming and are the most supportive of pro-
climate policies and actions. The "Concerned" also believe that global warming is happening and is a serious –
but more distant – threat, so it is viewed as less urgent. The "Cautious," "Disengaged," and "Doubtful" are at
different stages of understanding the problem, and none are actively engaged with the issue, while the
"Dismissive" typically reject the reality, human causation, and seriousness of global warming, and oppose
climate action.
The Alarmed and Concerned are more willing to adopt a more plant-based (and therefore climate-friendly) diet
than are other Americans (the Cautious, Disengaged, Doubtful, and Dismissive). Nearly all of the Alarmed
(97%) and Concerned (96%) are willing to eat more fruit and vegetables compared to 90% of all other
Americans. Large majorities of the Alarmed are willing to eat more plant-based meat alternatives (77% vs. 55%
15
32
33
42
39
90
25
49
47
61
55
96
41
49
63
66
77
97
0 50 100
Eat meat that is grown from cell cultures in a laboratory
rather than taken from animals
Eat less dairy (milk, cheese)
Use dairy alternatives (soy milk, almond milk, etc.) instead
of dairy-based milk or cream
Eat less red meat (beef, lamb, pork)
Eat more plant-based meat alternatives (products made
with vegetables such as soy, potatoes, peas, etc.)
Eat more fruit and vegetables
Alarmed Concerned All Other Americans
How willing or unwilling would you be to do the following?
December 2019. Base: 1,043 U.S. adults. (Alarmed n = 295; Concerned n = 296;
All Other Americans: Cautious/Disengaged/Doubtful/Dismissive n = 452)
Alarmed and Concerned Americans are more willing than other Americans to adopt a more
plant-based diet
Eat more plant-based meat alternatives (products made
with vegetables such as soy, potatoes, peas, etc.)
Use dairy alternatives (soy milk, almond milk, etc.)
instead of dairy-based milk or cream
Eat meat that is grown from cell cultures in a laboratory
rather than taken from animals
Respondents (n = 48) who said they “never or almost never” eat red meat
products (beef, lamb, and pork) did not receive the question about eating
less red meat, and respondents (n = 46) who said they “never or almost
never” eat dairy products did not receive the two questions about
using/eating less dairy.
% % %
% who are “very” or “somewhat” willing to…
24. Climate Change and the American Diet
22
of the Concerned and 39% of all others), eat less red meat (66% vs. 61% of the Concerned and 42% of all
others), and/or use dairy alternatives instead of dairy-based milk or cream (63% vs. 47% of the Concerned and
33% of all others). About half of the Alarmed (49%) and Concerned (49%) are willing to eat less dairy,
compared to 32% of all other Americans.
Four in ten Alarmed Americans (41%) are willing to eat lab-grown meat rather than meat taken from animals,
while 25% of the Concerned and 15% of all other Americans are willing to do so.
20
https://climatecommunication.yale.edu/about/projects/global-warmings-six-americas/
21
https://climatecommunication.yale.edu/visualizations-data/sassy/
25. Climate Change and the American Diet
23
7.2. More than half of Alarmed Americans frequently look for information and/or talk to family and
friends about the environmental impact of different products and/or foods.
More than half of the Alarmed "always," "often," or "sometimes" look for information about the environmental
impact of different products and/or foods (57%) and/or talk to family and friends about the environmental
impact of different products and/or foods (55%). In contrast, 34% of the Concerned and 20% of all other
Americans look for information about environmental impacts at this rate, and even fewer talk to family and
friends about the issue (25% of the Concerned and 15% of all others).
The Alarmed are also more likely than other Americans to have rewarded and/or punished food companies for
their environmental actions. About half of the Alarmed (52%) have rewarded food companies that are taking
steps to reduce their impact on the environment by buying their products at least once in the last year, and 42%
have punished food companies that are not taking steps by not buying their products. Only 22% of the
Concerned and 13% of all other Americans have rewarded food companies for their environmental actions, and
fewer (14% of the Concerned and 11% of all others) have punished food companies.
11
13
15
20
14
22
25
34
42
52
55
57
0 50 100
Punished food companies that are not taking steps to
reduce their impact on the environment by NOT buying
their products
Rewarded food companies that are taking steps to reduce
their impact on the environment by buying their products
Talk to family and friends about the environmental impact
of different products and/or foods
Look for information about the environmental impact of
different products and/or foods
Alarmed Concerned All Other Americans
How often do you do the following things?
Over the past 12 months, how many times have you done the following?
December 2019. Base: 1,043 U.S. adults. (Alarmed n = 295; Concerned n = 296;
All Other Americans: Cautious/Disengaged/Doubtful/Dismissive n = 452)
More than half of Alarmed Americans frequently look for information and/or talk to family and
friends about the environmental impact of different products and/or foods
– The Alarmed reward and/or punish food companies for their environmental actions more than other Americans –
Look for information about the environmental impact of
different products and/or foods
Talk to family and friends about the environmental impact
of different products and/or foods
% % %
% who “always,” “often,” or “sometimes”…
Rewarded food companies that are taking steps to reduce
their impact on the environment by buying their products
Punished food companies that are not taking steps to
reduce their impact on the environment by NOT buying
their products
% who did the following “once” or more often over the
past 12 months…
26. Climate Change and the American Diet
24
Appendix I: Data Tables
Note: In the data tables, -- denotes that there were no responses in that cell, whereas * denotes that the value is > 0 but < 0.5.
(Base: 1,043 Americans 18+)
About how often do you eat the following:
More than
once a day
(%)
Every day or
almost every
day (%)
About 2 to 5
times per
week (%)
About once a
week (%)
Less than
once a week
(%)
Never or
almost never
(%)
Refused (%)
Vegetables 14 39 35 6 5 2 --
Grains
(bread,
pasta, rice,
etc.)
12 37 33 11 5 3 --
Dairy
products
(milk,
cheese, etc.)
11 36 32 10 6 5 *
Fruit 13 28 34 14 9 2 *
Poultry
(chicken,
turkey, etc.)
1 11 56 23 7 3 *
Eggs 1 12 38 25 17 6 --
Beef (steak,
ground beef,
etc.)
1 7 33 30 21 8 *
Pork (ham,
bacon,
sausage,
etc.)
* 3 22 33 29 12 *
Fish or
seafood
* 2 17 25 40 16 --
Plant-based
dairy
alternatives
(soy milk,
almond
milk, etc.)
2 8 10 6 15 59 --
Plant-based
meat
alternatives
(products
made with
vegetables
such as soy,
potatoes,
peas, etc.)
* 3 6 7 11 72 --
Tofu * * 2 3 12 82 --
Lamb * * 1 1 18 80 --
27. Climate Change and the American Diet
25
(Base: 1,043 Americans 18+)
Do you consider yourself a vegan or vegetarian?
%
Vegan 1
Vegetarian 3
I describe my dietary choices in
a different way (Please specify):
2
I am neither vegan nor
vegetarian
94
Refused *
(Base: 1,043 Americans 18+)
How strongly do you agree or disagree with each of the following statements regarding purchasing or
eating plant-based foods (fruit, vegetables, meat/dairy alternatives)?
I prefer meals with meat (beef, chicken, fish, etc.) and/or dairy.
%
Strongly agree (%) 42
Somewhat agree (%) 39
Somewhat disagree (%) 12
Strongly disagree (%) 5
Refused/Not applicablea
(%) 2
28. Climate Change and the American Diet
26
(Base: 1,043 Americans 18+)
About how often do you do the following:
Every day or
almost every
day (%)
About 2 to 5
times per
week (%)
About once a
week (%)
Less than
once a week
(%)
Never or
almost never
(%)
Refused
(%)
Eat dinner at home that you or
someone in your household prepared
and cooked (excluding pre-made and
frozen meals)
43 41 7 6 4 *
Eat dinner at a restaurant (other than
fast food)
* 10 28 46 17
Eat fast food for dinner (McDonald's,
KFC, Taco Bell, etc.)
1 10 23 36 30 *
Order take-out for dinner through
food delivery apps (DoorDash, Uber
Eats, etc.) or delivery services
provided by restaurants
* 2 7 18 73 *
Eat dinner at home which has
ingredients supplied by food delivery
services (Blue Apron, Home Chef,
etc.)
2 3 2 4 90 *
(Base: 1,043 Americans 18+)
How important are each of the following to you personally, if at all, when you choose to purchase or eat
plant-based foods (fruit, vegetables, meat/dairy alternatives)?
Extremely
important (%)
Very
important (%)
Moderately
important (%)
Not too
important (%)
Not at all
important (%)
Refused/Not
applicablea
(%)
Your health 33 40 19 3 6 *
The taste of the plant-based
food
26 41 16 6 10 *
How quick or easy it is to
prepare
10 31 36 11 11 *
The price of the plant-based
food
15 32 28 11 14 *
How food companies affect
the environment
14 25 31 15 14 *
Helping to reduce global
warming
14 23 27 16 20 *
Protecting animals 15 19 30 18 18 *
What other people (family,
friends) think
4 8 15 27 46 *
a
Respondents (n = 1) who said they "never or almost never" eat the following plant-based foods – vegetables, fruit, plant-based dairy
alternatives, plant-based dairy alternatives, plant-based meat alternatives, tofu, and grains – did not receive these questions.
29. Climate Change and the American Diet
27
(Base: 1,043 Americans 18+)
How strongly do you agree or disagree with each of the following statements regarding purchasing or
eating plant-based foods (fruit, vegetables, meat/dairy alternatives)?
Nobody has ever asked me to eat more plant-based foods.
U.S. Population
Annual Household Income
Less than $50k $50k – $99,999k $100k or more
n 1,043 281 358 404
Strongly agree (%) 31 31 33 29
Somewhat agree (%) 34 34 34 33
Somewhat disagree (%) 20 18 19 21
Strongly disagree (%) 13 14 11 15
Refused/Not applicablea
(%) 2 2 3 3
It costs too much to buy plant-based foods.
U.S. Population
Annual Household Income
Less than $50k $50k – $99,999k $100k or more
n 1,043 281 358 404
Strongly agree (%) 15 19 15 11
Somewhat agree (%) 43 52 44 35
Somewhat disagree (%) 27 19 27 34
Strongly disagree (%) 13 9 10 18
Refused/Not applicablea
(%) 2 1 4 2
I don't know what plant-based foods to buy.
U.S. Population
Annual Household Income
Less than $50k $50k – $99,999k $100k or more
n 1,043 281 358 404
Strongly agree (%) 15 17 17 11
Somewhat agree (%) 38 41 38 35
Somewhat disagree (%) 24 22 24 27
Strongly disagree (%) 20 18 17 24
Refused/Not applicablea
(%) 2 2 3 3
I don't know how to cook with plant-based foods.
U.S. Population
Annual Household Income
Less than $50k $50k – $99,999k $100k or more
n 1,043 281 358 404
Strongly agree (%) 16 23 16 10
Somewhat agree (%) 31 34 31 29
Somewhat disagree (%) 26 19 26 30
Strongly disagree (%) 25 23 23 28
Refused/Not applicablea
(%) 2 1 3 2
a
Respondents (U.S. population n = 13; Lower-income n = 3; Middle-income n = 5; Higher-income n = 5) who said they "never or
almost never" the following meat products – beef, lamb, pork, poultry, and fish/seafood – did not receive these questions.
30. Climate Change and the American Diet
28
(Base: 1,043 Americans 18+)
How strongly do you agree or disagree with each of the following statements regarding purchasing or
eating plant-based foods (fruit, vegetables, meat/dairy alternatives)? (Cont'd.)
It’s too much of an effort to buy plant-based foods.
U.S. Population
Annual Household Income
Less than $50k $50k – $99,999k $100k or more
n 1,043 281 358 404
Strongly agree (%) 8 9 8 6
Somewhat agree (%) 37 43 37 31
Somewhat disagree (%) 32 29 30 36
Strongly disagree (%) 22 17 22 25
Refused/Not applicablea
(%) 2 2 3 3
I don't like the taste of plant-based foods.
U.S. Population
Annual Household Income
Less than $50k $50k – $99,999k $100k or more
n 1,043 281 358 404
Strongly agree (%) 8 11 7 7
Somewhat agree (%) 36 33 38 36
Somewhat disagree (%) 32 34 34 30
Strongly disagree (%) 21 21 18 24
Refused/Not applicablea
(%) 2 2 3 3
It has never occurred to me to eat more plant-based foods.
U.S. Population
Annual Household Income
Less than $50k $50k – $99,999k $100k or more
n 1,043 281 358 404
Strongly agree (%) 13 15 15 10
Somewhat agree (%) 31 36 33 24
Somewhat disagree (%) 28 25 28 31
Strongly disagree (%) 26 22 21 32
Refused/Not applicablea
(%) 2 2 3 3
There are traditions or celebrations in my culture/heritage in which eating meat (beef, chicken, fish, etc.) plays
an important role.
U.S. Population
Annual Household Income
Less than $50k $50k – $99,999k $100k or more
n 1,043 281 358 404
Strongly agree (%) 15 15 14 15
Somewhat agree (%) 27 29 26 26
Somewhat disagree (%) 18 19 16 19
Strongly disagree (%) 38 35 41 39
Refused/Not applicablea
(%) 2 2 3 2
a
Respondents (U.S. population n = 13; Lower-income n = 3; Middle-income n = 5; Higher-income n = 5) who said they "never or
almost never" eat the following meat products – beef, lamb, pork, poultry, and fish/seafood – did not receive these questions.
31. Climate Change and the American Diet
29
(Base: 1,043 Americans 18+)
How strongly do you agree or disagree with each of the following statements regarding purchasing or
eating plant-based foods (fruit, vegetables, meat/dairy alternatives)? (Cont'd.)
I don't think it's important to eat plant-based foods.
U.S. Population
Annual Household Income
Less than $50k $50k – $99,999k $100k or more
n 1,043 281 358 404
Strongly agree (%) 12 14 10 12
Somewhat agree (%) 26 25 28 26
Somewhat disagree (%) 34 36 33 33
Strongly disagree (%) 25 23 26 27
Refused/Not applicablea
(%) 2 1 3 2
I don't have enough time to cook with plant-based foods.
U.S. Population
Annual Household Income
Less than $50k $50k – $99,999k $100k or more
n 1,043 281 358 404
Strongly agree (%) 8 13 8 4
Somewhat agree (%) 25 31 25 21
Somewhat disagree (%) 39 33 42 41
Strongly disagree (%) 25 20 22 32
Refused/Not applicablea
(%) 2 2 3 3
I don't have a grocery store/market close to where I live.
U.S. Population
Annual Household Income
Less than $50k $50k – $99,999k $100k or more
n 1,043 281 358 404
Strongly agree (%) 4 6 4 3
Somewhat agree (%) 9 14 8 7
Somewhat disagree (%) 15 17 18 12
Strongly disagree (%) 69 62 68 77
Refused/Not applicablea
(%) 2 1 3 2
I don't have access to fresh produce (fruit, vegetables).
U.S. Population
Annual Household Income
Less than $50k $50k – $99,999k $100k or more
n 1,043 281 358 404
Strongly agree (%) 2 3 1 2
Somewhat agree (%) 7 11 5 5
Somewhat disagree (%) 20 26 20 15
Strongly disagree (%) 69 59 70 76
Refused/Not applicablea
(%) 2 1 3 2
a
Respondents (U.S. population n = 13; Lower-income n = 3; Middle-income n = 5; Higher-income n = 5) who said they "never or
almost never" eat the following meat products – beef, lamb, pork, poultry, and fish/seafood – did not receive these questions.
32. Climate Change and the American Diet
30
(Base: 1,043 Americans 18+)
Do you think a meal with a plant-based main course (fruit, vegetables, meat/dairy alternatives) is more
expensive, less expensive, or about the same cost as a meal with a meat-based main course (beef, chicken,
fish, etc.)?
U.S. Population
Annual Household Income
Less than $50k $50k – $99,999k $100k or more
n 1,043 281 358 404
More expensive (%) 49 53 52 42
Same cost (%) 22 19 18 28
Less expensive (%) 14 13 12 17
Don't know (%) 15 16 17 12
Refused (%) * -- -- *
(Base: 1,043 Americans 18+)
How willing or unwilling would you be to do the following?
Very willing
(%)
Somewhat
willing (%)
Somewhat
unwilling
(%)
Very
unwilling
(%)
Refused/Not
applicablea
(%)
Eat more fruit and vegetables 62 32 4 2 *
Eat more plant-based meat
alternatives (products made with
vegetables such as soy, potatoes,
peas, etc.)
16 39 25 20 *
Eat less red meat (beef, lamb, pork) 19 36 22 19 5
Use dairy alternatives (soy milk,
almond milk, etc.) instead of dairy-
based milk or cream
16 29 25 25 5
Eat less dairy (milk, cheese) 8 34 32 22 5
Eat meat that is grown from cell
cultures in a laboratory rather than
taken from animals
5 21 26 48 *
a
Respondents (n = 48) who said they "never or almost never" eat red meat products (beef, lamb, and pork) did not receive
the "eat less red meat (beef, lamb, pork)" statement. Respondents (n = 46) who said they "never or almost never" eat dairy
products (milk, cheese) did not receive the following statements: "use dairy alternatives (soy milk, almond milk, etc.)
instead of dairy-based milk or cream," and "eat less dairy (milk, cheese)."
33. Climate Change and the American Diet
31
(Base: 1,043 Americans 18+)
How likely or unlikely is it that you would eat more plant-based foods (fruit, vegetables, meat/dairy
alternatives) instead of meat (beef, chicken, fish, etc.) if the following happened?
Very likely
(%)
Somewhat
likely (%)
Somewhat
unlikely (%)
Very
unlikely (%)
Don't know
(%)
Refused/Not
applicablea
(%)
If plant-based foods tasted better
than they do today
29 38 10 12 8 2
If plant-based foods cost less than
meat options
33 30 13 15 7 2
If I had better access to fresh
produce (fruit, vegetables)
32 30 15 14 6 2
If there were more plant-based food
options in stores
25 36 14 16 7 2
If I had more information about the
environmental impact of different
products and/or foods
18 33 20 21 6 2
If my family and friends ate more
plant-based foods instead of meat
18 32 18 24 7 2
If someone I like and respect asked
me to
10 34 23 24 7 2
If a celebrity or public figure
(athlete, actor, singer, etc.) I like and
respect asked Americans to
3 10 20 58 8 2
a
Respondents (n = 13) who said they "never or almost never" eat the following meat products – beef, lamb, pork, poultry, and
fish/seafood – did not receive these questions.
(Base: 1,043 Americans 18+)
How much do you think the production of the following foods contributes to global warming, if at all?
A lot (%) Some (%) A little (%)
Not at all
(%)
Don't know
(%)
Refused
(%)
Beef (steak, ground beef, etc.) 27 19 11 23 20 *
Pork (ham, bacon, sausage, etc.) 20 22 13 23 21 *
Dairy products (milk, cheese, etc.) 17 23 14 23 23 *
Poultry (chicken, turkey, etc.) 14 24 15 24 22 *
Farmed fish and seafood 12 18 17 28 24 *
Fruit and vegetables 7 15 19 38 20 *
Nuts 7 15 17 37 24 *
34. Climate Change and the American Diet
32
(Base: 1,043 Americans 18+)
If everyone did the following, how much do you think it would reduce global warming, if at all?
A lot (%) Some (%) A little (%)
Not at all
(%)
Don't know
(%)
Refused
(%)
Cooked over “clean cookstoves”
(solar-powered, fuel-efficient,
thermal-efficient)
23 28 18 16 14 *
Threw away less food 21 24 17 21 16 *
Composted food waste 18 27 18 21 16 *
Ate a more plant-based diet (fruit,
vegetables, meat/dairy alternatives)
18 25 15 23 19 *
Bought food that is grown or
produced locally
17 29 16 21 17 *
Bought organic food 10 22 17 31 19 *
(Base: 1,043 Americans 18+)
How often do you hear about the impact of food choices on global warming in the media (TV, movies,
radio, newspapers/news websites, magazines, etc.)?
%
At least once a week 13
At least once a month 16
Several times a year 16
Once a year or less often 11
Never 29
Don't know 14
Refused *
35. Climate Change and the American Diet
33
(Base: 1,043 Americans 18+)
How often do you do the following things?
Always (%) Often (%)
Sometimes
(%)
Rarely (%) Never (%) Refused (%)
Throw out uneaten or
spoiled food because you no
longer want it or it went bad
10 24 42 21 2 --
Compost food waste 6 9 14 16 56 --
Look for information about
the environmental impact of
different products and/or
foods
2 10 24 30 35 *
Talk to family and friends
about the environmental
impact of different products
and/or foods
1 8 21 31 39 *
Buy food grown or
produced locally
4 28 46 16 6 *
(Base: 1,043 Americans 18+)
Over the past 12 months, how many times have you done the following?
Many times
(6+) (%)
Several
times (4-5)
(%)
Sometimes
(2-3) (%)
Once (%) Never (%)
Don't know
(%)
Refused
(%)
Rewarded food
companies that are
taking steps to reduce
their impact on the
environment by buying
their products
5 6 13 3 62 10 *
Punished food
companies that are not
taking steps to reduce
their impact on the
environment by NOT
buying their products
4 4 11 3 69 9 *
36. Climate Change and the American Diet
34
(Base: 1,043 Americans 18+)
Global Warming's Six Americas
%
Alarmed 30
Concerned 29
Cautious 15
Disengaged 4
Doubtful 11
Dismissive 12
Respondents were categorized based on their responses to four
questions – see the Six Americas Super Short Survey
(https://climatecommunication.yale.edu/visualizations-data/sassy/)
for details on the methodology.
How willing or unwilling would you be to do the following?
Eat more fruit and vegetables.
Alarmed Concerned
Cautious/Disengaged/
Doubtful/Dismissive
n 295 296 452
Very willing (%) 78 61 51
Somewhat willing (%) 19 35 40
Somewhat unwilling (%) 2 4 5
Very unwilling (%) 1 1 5
Refused (%) * -- --
Eat less red meat (beef, lamb, pork).
Alarmed Concerned
Cautious/Disengaged/
Doubtful/Dismissive
n 295 296 452
Very willing (%) 33 18 9
Somewhat willing (%) 32 43 33
Somewhat unwilling (%) 14 23 26
Very unwilling (%) 9 15 29
Refused/Not applicablea
(%) 12 2 3
a
Respondents (Alarmed n = 29; Concerned n = 6; Cautious/Disengaged/Doubtful/Dismissive n = 13) who said they "never or almost
never" eat red meat products (beef, lamb, and pork) did not receive this question.
Eat more plant-based meat alternatives (products made with vegetables such as soy, potatoes, peas, etc.).
Alarmed Concerned
Cautious/Disengaged/
Doubtful/Dismissive
n 295 296 452
Very willing (%) 34 10 8
Somewhat willing (%) 43 45 31
Somewhat unwilling (%) 16 27 29
Very unwilling (%) 7 17 31
Refused (%) -- -- *
37. Climate Change and the American Diet
35
(Base: 1,043 Americans 18+)
How willing or unwilling would you be to do the following? (Cont'd.)
Use dairy alternatives (soy milk, almond milk, etc.) instead of dairy-based milk or cream.
Alarmed Concerned
Cautious/Disengaged/
Doubtful/Dismissive
n 295 296 452
Very willing (%) 26 16 9
Somewhat willing (%) 36 31 23
Somewhat unwilling (%) 20 30 24
Very unwilling (%) 12 19 39
Refused/Not applicablea
(%) 5 4 5
a
Respondents (Alarmed n = 16; Concerned n = 12; Cautious/Disengaged/Doubtful/Dismissive n = 18) who said they "never or almost
never" eat dairy products (milk, cheese) did not receive this question.
Eat less dairy (milk, cheese).
Alarmed Concerned
Cautious/Disengaged/
Doubtful/Dismissive
n 295 296 452
Very willing (%) 13 7 5
Somewhat willing (%) 36 43 27
Somewhat unwilling (%) 31 32 32
Very unwilling (%) 15 15 32
Refused/Not applicablea
(%) 5 4 5
a
Respondents (Alarmed n = 16; Concerned n = 12; Cautious/Disengaged/Doubtful/Dismissive n = 18) who said they "never or almost
never" eat dairy products (milk, cheese) did not receive this question.
Eat meat that is grown from cell cultures in a laboratory rather than taken from animals.
Alarmed Concerned
Cautious/Disengaged/
Doubtful/Dismissive
n 295 296 452
Very willing (%) 13 3 1
Somewhat willing (%) 28 22 14
Somewhat unwilling (%) 21 32 26
Very unwilling (%) 39 43 59
Refused (%) -- -- *
38. Climate Change and the American Diet
36
(Base: 1,043 Americans 18+)
How often do you do the following things?
Look for information about the environmental impact of different products and/or foods.
Alarmed Concerned
Cautious/Disengaged/
Doubtful/Dismissive
n 295 296 452
Always (%) 3 1 1
Often (%) 19 6 5
Sometimes (%) 34 27 14
Rarely (%) 27 36 29
Never (%) 16 30 51
Refused (%) -- * --
Talk to family and friends about the environmental impact of different products and/or foods.
Alarmed Concerned
Cautious/Disengaged/
Doubtful/Dismissive
n 295 296 452
Always (%) 3 0 0
Often (%) 19 3 4
Sometimes (%) 34 21 11
Rarely (%) 29 36 28
Never (%) 16 38 57
Refused (%) -- * --
39. Climate Change and the American Diet
37
(Base: 1,043 Americans 18+)
Over the past 12 months, how many times have you done the following?
Rewarded food companies that are taking steps to reduce their impact on the environment by buying their
products.
Alarmed Concerned
Cautious/Disengaged/
Doubtful/Dismissive
n 295 296 452
Many times (6+) (%) 10 4 2
Several times (4-5) (%) 12 5 3
Sometimes (2-3) (%) 23 12 7
Once (%) 7 2 2
Never (%) 37 65 78
Don't know (%) 11 12 9
Refused (%) * * --
Punished food companies that are not taking steps to reduce their impact on the environment by NOT buying
their products.
Alarmed Concerned
Cautious/Disengaged/
Doubtful/Dismissive
n 295 296 452
Many times (6+) (%) 8 3 2
Several times (4-5) (%) 9 2 1
Sometimes (2-3) (%) 22 6 6
Once (%) 4 3 2
Never (%) 44 76 83
Don't know (%) 14 10 6
Refused (%) * -- --
40. Climate Change and the American Diet
38
Appendix II: Survey Method
The data in this report are based on a nationally representative survey of 1,043 American adults, aged 18 and
older. The survey was conducted December 6 – 11, 2019. All questionnaires were self-administered by
respondents in a web-based environment. The survey took, on average, 10 minutes to complete.
The sample was drawn from the Ipsos (formerly GfK) KnowledgePanel®
, an online panel of members drawn
using probability sampling methods. Prospective members are recruited using a combination of random digit
dial and address-based sampling techniques that cover virtually all (non-institutional) resident phone numbers
and addresses in the United States. Those contacted who would choose to join the panel but do not have access
to the Internet are loaned computers and given Internet access so they may participate.
The sample therefore includes a representative cross-section of American adults – irrespective of whether they
have Internet access, use only a cell phone, etc. Key demographic variables were weighted, post-survey, to
match U.S. Census Bureau norms.
The survey instrument was designed by Matthew Ballew, Seth Rosenthal, Anthony Leiserowitz, and Jillian
Semaan.
Sample details and margins of error
All samples are subject to some degree of sampling error – that is, statistical results obtained from a sample can
be expected to differ somewhat from results that would be obtained if every member of the target population
were interviewed. Average margins of error, at the 95% confidence level, are plus or minus 3 percentage points
for the entire U.S. sample.
Rounding error
For tabulation purposes, percentage points are rounded to the nearest whole number. As a result, percentages in
a given chart may total slightly higher or lower than 100%. Summed response categories (e.g., "strongly
support" + "somewhat support") are rounded after sums are calculated (e.g., 25.3% + 25.3% = 50.6%, which,
after rounding, would be reported as 25% + 25% = 51%).
41. Climate Change and the American Diet
39
Appendix III: Sample Demographics
N
(unweighted)
%
(weighted)
Total 1,043 100
Men 530 48
Women 513 52
iGen (18-22) 32 5
Millennial (23-38) 230 30
Generation X (39-54) 249 25
Baby Boomer (55-73) 427 33
Silent Generation (74+) 105 7
Less than high school 70 11
High school graduate 258 28
Some college/Associate degree/Technical degree 306 28
College graduate 237 20
Post-graduate 172 14
<$25K 121 14
$25K - <$50K 160 18
$50K - <$75K 200 17
$75K - <$100K 158 14
$100K - <$125K 135 11
$125K+ 269 26
White, non-Hispanic 754 63
Black, African-American non-Hispanic 105 12
Hispanic 115 16
Other non-Hispanic 69 9
Northeast 173 17
Midwest 248 21
South 391 38
West 231 24