The document describes the development and validation of a new measure called the Workplace Social Self-Efficacy (WSSE) inventory. It is a 4-factor measure of an employee's confidence in their ability to engage in social tasks at work. Two studies found the WSSE inventory has good psychometric properties, including a clear factor structure, high internal consistency, and validity evidenced by relationships with other related constructs. Political skill was also found to mediate the relationship between WSSE and several outcomes. The new measure addresses the need for a domain-specific social self-efficacy measure tailored to the workplace.
Effects of internal_social_media_and_ocb____research_proposal[1]SohailTariq16
This research proposal aims to examine the impact of internal social media on employee engagement and organizational citizenship behavior. The student proposes to investigate whether internal social media engages employees, the effect of positive voice behavior on employee engagement, and whether internal social media affects organizational citizenship behavior. The proposal outlines the research questions, contribution, objectives, theoretical model relating internal social media to employee engagement and citizenship behavior, and provides a literature review on internal communication, social media, and their benefits and challenges.
Mediating Effect of Reputation on the Relationship between Interpersonal Skil...paperpublications3
Abstract: Career success is determined by a number of factors, including some combination of specific competencies and a performance record, along with network development, organizational politics, and reputation building. The county government of Uasin Gishu has of late received negative publicity for its policy on career development. Although interpersonal skills have been argued by researchers to demonstrate influence on work and career outcomes, a few attempts have been made to show how interpersonal skills influences these outcomes. This study investigated the relationship between interpersonal skills and career success of employees of Uasin Gishu County. The specific objectives of the study were: To determine the relationship between networking and career success, to establish the relationship between personal promotion and career success, to determine the relationship between impression management and career success, to establish the relationship between use of influence tactics and career success, and to determine whether reputation has any mediating effect on the relationship between interpersonal skills and career success. A case research design was used. Target population was all the employees of Uasin Gishu County government. Stratified ransom sampling and then simple random sampling was used to obtain the respondents for this proposed study. Primary data was collected using standard questionnaires. Interpersonal skills were taken as the independent variable, career success the dependent variable, and reputation as the mediating variable. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha and the data was analyzed using SPSS. Both descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyze the data. The study findings showed a significant positive correlation between networking skills and career success (r = .933, p=0.000), impression management and career success (r = .775, p=0.000), self-promotion and career success (r =.933, p=0.000), use of influence tactics and career success (r=.896, p=0.000). Also there was a significant positive correlation between reputation and networking skills (r =.909, p=0.000), impression management (r =829, p=0.000), self-promotion (r=.933, p=0.000), and use of influence tactics(r=.896, p=0.000), (r=.909, p=0.000). The result of the study indicated that networking does not have a significant effect on career success, impression management was found to have a positive significant relationship with career success, and there was no significant effect of use of influence tactics on career success. Reputation was found to partially mediate the relationship between interpersonal skills and career success and hence on the other hand, results indicated that reputation fully mediate the relationship between impression management and career success and hence. It was also found that reputation fully mediated the relationship between self-promotion and career success.
DBA 7420, Organizational Behavior and Comparative Manatroutmanboris
DBA 7420, Organizational Behavior and Comparative Management 1
Course Learning Outcomes for Unit IV
Upon completion of this unit, students should be able to:
4. Explain the levels of analysis of organizational behavior models.
4.1 Analyze the inputs, processes, and outcomes of an organizational behavior model.
4.2 Explain the three levels of analysis of an organizational behavior model.
Course/Unit
Learning Outcomes
Learning Activity
4.1
Unit Lesson
Chapter 1, pp. 26–31
Chapter 5, pp. 145–150
Chapter 6, pp. 199
Chapter 12, pp. 398–400
Chapter 18, pp. 631
Article: “The Five-Factor Model of Personality Traits and Organizational
Citizenship Behaviors: A Meta-Analysis”
Unit IV Essay
4.2
Unit Lesson
Chapter 1, pp. 26–31
Chapter 5, pp. 145–150
Chapter 6, pp. 199
Chapter 12, pp. 398–400
Chapter 18, pp. 631
Article: “The Five-Factor Model of Personality Traits and Organizational
Citizenship Behaviors: A Meta-Analysis”
Unit IV Essay
Reading Assignment
Chapter 1: What Is Organizational Behavior?, pp. 26–31
Chapter 5: Personality and Values, pp. 145–150
Chapter 6: Perception and Individual Decision Making, p. 199
Chapter 12: Leadership, pp. 398–400
Chapter 18: Organizational Change and Stress Management, p. 631
In order to access the following resource, click the link below.
Chiaburu, D. S., Oh, I.-S., Berry, C. M., Li, N., & Gardner, R. G. (2011). The five-factor model of personality
traits and organizational citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(6),
1140–1166. Retrieved from
https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direc
t=true&db=pdh&AN=2011-12684-001&site=ehost-live&scope=site
UNIT IV STUDY GUIDE
Organizational Behavior Models
https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=pdh&AN=2011-12684-001&site=ehost-live&scope=site
https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=pdh&AN=2011-12684-001&site=ehost-live&scope=site
DBA 7420, Organizational Behavior and Comparative Management 2
UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
Title
Unit Lesson
Introduction
As we elaborate on our understanding of organizational behavior, it can be helpful to explore several different
models. These models enable us to look at a concept from a variety of different perspectives. There is no
one-size-fits-all to explain organizational behavior. Instead, the behaviors exhibited are the result of
interactions between multiple variables that are also influenced by the level of analysis. So, before we delve
into the models themselves, one must understand the variables involved and the different levels of analyses
that come together to form the models.
Types of Variables
There are three types of variables involved in creating an organizational model. These variables include
inputs ...
Reply 2 to DRGOI think self -monitoring is how we evaluate ourse.docxsodhi3
Reply 2 to DRGO
I think self -monitoring is how we evaluate ourselves and is a way to make us better. If we were to truly monitor, correct the faults that we see, and build on our strengths on some of the critical traits for locus of control, how we perceive ourselves and others, self-efficacy, attitude and self-esteem we could change our weaker areas. "Locus of control deals with the degree to which people feel accountable for their own behaviors"(The Saylor Foundation, 2017). Locus of control discusses the internal and external locus of control. Internal means that you are the reason something is happening and external is saying that something else caused this to happen. "Perception may be defined as the process with which individuals detect and interpret environmental stimuli"(The Saylor Foundation, 2017). The three areas of perception are visual, Self and social. A persons perception might not always be as they think it is and might cause them to judge another person the wrong way by misunderstanding their actions. I think self perception has to do with the way people are and depends a lot on how they grew up. It plays a large part in their self esteem, whether they are approachable, social or just like to keep to themselves. "Self-efficacy is a belief that one can perform a specific task successfully"(The Saylor Foundation, 2017). Everyone does not have this ability, but the ones that do are usually successful when trying new things and getting the job done above the standard. I think that this is crucial in any organization, especially the Army. We are always getting new tasks, promotion, and missions that we have never done before that if we fail have a lot of consequences. Failure cannot be in our thought process. Understanding this in the work place will help with the dynamics that come a long with a lot of different personalities. You shouldn't be quick to judge others by getting the wrong perception. Helping yourself and others understand this will build a stronger organization and team within that organization.
Reply 2 to TRGR
Locus of control, self-esteem, self-efficacy, self-monitoring, and attitudes and perception make-up a sort of melting pot of how one behaves. Locus of control describes the level of accountability people assume in regard to their behavior, (Saylor Foundation, 2017). Self-esteem is described as how a person feels about themselves, (Saylor Foundation, 2017). Perception is how individuals “detect and interpret environmental stimuli, (Saylor Foundation, 2017). Finally, self-efficacy refers to the belief an individual has that they can perform a specific task specifically, (Saylor Foundation, 2017). Depending upon the levels of these concepts that the individual possesses is the result of how one is able to self-monitor their actions in a number of situations, (Saylor Foundation, 2017). For example, a person with high self-esteem is likely to have much higher job satisfaction and performance. Relative to self-mo ...
Perception of job performance appraisals toward turnover intention and job sa...Alexander Decker
This document summarizes a research journal article that examines the relationship between perceptions of job performance appraisals, turnover intentions, and job satisfaction. The study was conducted among marketing employees in pharmaceutical companies in Pakistan. The researchers hypothesized that perceived politics in performance appraisals would be negatively related to job satisfaction and positively related to turnover intentions. Data was collected through questionnaires measuring perceptions of performance appraisal politics, organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover intentions. The results supported the hypotheses, finding that perceived politics in performance appraisals predicted lower job satisfaction and higher turnover intentions among employees.
1Running Head NATURE OF WORK 7NATURE OF WORK .docxnovabroom
1
Running Head: NATURE OF WORK
7
NATURE OF WORK
NATURE OF WORK
Claudia Rangel
CCMH 540 week 1
Career and Vocational Counseling
Mrs. Cinthya Yaptangco
November 14, 2018
The nature of work has changed considerably over time with various factors being attributed to this change. The first way in which the nature of work has changed over time is through the advent of more advanced technologies with the progression of history. Today technological breakthroughs for instance in robotics, artificial intelligence, microelectronics, computer-integrated assembly, and manufacturing. Moreover, the proliferation in digital telecommunications depicted in the global reach of the Internet have all impacted the nature of work throughout the generations of their creation (National Research Council, 1999). These new technologies have made the nature of work to shift from being predominantly physically intensive to being more intellectually challenging with more emphasis being placed on an individual’s technical ability rather than their physical capacities.
The second way in which the nature of the work has also experienced change over time is through the effect of the demographic constitution of the workforce. These have become evident in the increasing presence of women in the workplace, the enhancement in the levels of cultural diversity in the workplace, and improvements in the education levels of the workforce. These factors have worked over the progression of time in changing the nature of vocation (National Research Council, 1999). These changes in the demography of the workforce have the led to a alteration in the forms of work since the labor market can get a more skilled workforce. Through the greater inclusivity of the hiring criteria, the improved educational qualifications of the workforce among other factors have helped in making the workplace to be more conducive and accommodating with the progression of time.
There have been significant changes in the attitudes towards work seen amongst people from different generations through the progression of time. The leading cause of conflict in the workplace, between generations, has been attributed to the perceived decline in the work ethic with the progress of time. For example generation, X has been tagged as the ‘lazy’ generation (Adams, 2000). The employers have made the complaint that younger workers do not display commitment in their output and only work the required hours and rarely go beyond its limits. The boomer's generation is known to be workaholics and is known to have started the trend. In addition to this, the traditional attitude to work has been in the description that they are the hardest working generation.
The nature of the relationship between work and personal life is often left unexamined because most people prefer to separate these two areas of their lives and to treat them as separate entities. Despite this, various connections have been found between the activities t.
What is organizational citizenship behavior (autosaved)Shashwat Shankar
Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB) refers to discretionary behaviors by employees that are not required as part of their job but benefit the organization. These behaviors include altruism, courtesy, sportsmanship, conscientiousness, and civic virtue. Research found OCB to be positively related across manufacturing, banking, and IT organizations and that strengthening organizational culture can foster OCB. Perceptions of job insecurity may encourage behaviors intended to appear beneficial to the organization but that could be unethical. HR managers should be aware of this risk for employees feeling insecure.
Effects of internal_social_media_and_ocb____research_proposal[1]SohailTariq16
This research proposal aims to examine the impact of internal social media on employee engagement and organizational citizenship behavior. The student proposes to investigate whether internal social media engages employees, the effect of positive voice behavior on employee engagement, and whether internal social media affects organizational citizenship behavior. The proposal outlines the research questions, contribution, objectives, theoretical model relating internal social media to employee engagement and citizenship behavior, and provides a literature review on internal communication, social media, and their benefits and challenges.
Mediating Effect of Reputation on the Relationship between Interpersonal Skil...paperpublications3
Abstract: Career success is determined by a number of factors, including some combination of specific competencies and a performance record, along with network development, organizational politics, and reputation building. The county government of Uasin Gishu has of late received negative publicity for its policy on career development. Although interpersonal skills have been argued by researchers to demonstrate influence on work and career outcomes, a few attempts have been made to show how interpersonal skills influences these outcomes. This study investigated the relationship between interpersonal skills and career success of employees of Uasin Gishu County. The specific objectives of the study were: To determine the relationship between networking and career success, to establish the relationship between personal promotion and career success, to determine the relationship between impression management and career success, to establish the relationship between use of influence tactics and career success, and to determine whether reputation has any mediating effect on the relationship between interpersonal skills and career success. A case research design was used. Target population was all the employees of Uasin Gishu County government. Stratified ransom sampling and then simple random sampling was used to obtain the respondents for this proposed study. Primary data was collected using standard questionnaires. Interpersonal skills were taken as the independent variable, career success the dependent variable, and reputation as the mediating variable. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha and the data was analyzed using SPSS. Both descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyze the data. The study findings showed a significant positive correlation between networking skills and career success (r = .933, p=0.000), impression management and career success (r = .775, p=0.000), self-promotion and career success (r =.933, p=0.000), use of influence tactics and career success (r=.896, p=0.000). Also there was a significant positive correlation between reputation and networking skills (r =.909, p=0.000), impression management (r =829, p=0.000), self-promotion (r=.933, p=0.000), and use of influence tactics(r=.896, p=0.000), (r=.909, p=0.000). The result of the study indicated that networking does not have a significant effect on career success, impression management was found to have a positive significant relationship with career success, and there was no significant effect of use of influence tactics on career success. Reputation was found to partially mediate the relationship between interpersonal skills and career success and hence on the other hand, results indicated that reputation fully mediate the relationship between impression management and career success and hence. It was also found that reputation fully mediated the relationship between self-promotion and career success.
DBA 7420, Organizational Behavior and Comparative Manatroutmanboris
DBA 7420, Organizational Behavior and Comparative Management 1
Course Learning Outcomes for Unit IV
Upon completion of this unit, students should be able to:
4. Explain the levels of analysis of organizational behavior models.
4.1 Analyze the inputs, processes, and outcomes of an organizational behavior model.
4.2 Explain the three levels of analysis of an organizational behavior model.
Course/Unit
Learning Outcomes
Learning Activity
4.1
Unit Lesson
Chapter 1, pp. 26–31
Chapter 5, pp. 145–150
Chapter 6, pp. 199
Chapter 12, pp. 398–400
Chapter 18, pp. 631
Article: “The Five-Factor Model of Personality Traits and Organizational
Citizenship Behaviors: A Meta-Analysis”
Unit IV Essay
4.2
Unit Lesson
Chapter 1, pp. 26–31
Chapter 5, pp. 145–150
Chapter 6, pp. 199
Chapter 12, pp. 398–400
Chapter 18, pp. 631
Article: “The Five-Factor Model of Personality Traits and Organizational
Citizenship Behaviors: A Meta-Analysis”
Unit IV Essay
Reading Assignment
Chapter 1: What Is Organizational Behavior?, pp. 26–31
Chapter 5: Personality and Values, pp. 145–150
Chapter 6: Perception and Individual Decision Making, p. 199
Chapter 12: Leadership, pp. 398–400
Chapter 18: Organizational Change and Stress Management, p. 631
In order to access the following resource, click the link below.
Chiaburu, D. S., Oh, I.-S., Berry, C. M., Li, N., & Gardner, R. G. (2011). The five-factor model of personality
traits and organizational citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(6),
1140–1166. Retrieved from
https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direc
t=true&db=pdh&AN=2011-12684-001&site=ehost-live&scope=site
UNIT IV STUDY GUIDE
Organizational Behavior Models
https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=pdh&AN=2011-12684-001&site=ehost-live&scope=site
https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=pdh&AN=2011-12684-001&site=ehost-live&scope=site
DBA 7420, Organizational Behavior and Comparative Management 2
UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
Title
Unit Lesson
Introduction
As we elaborate on our understanding of organizational behavior, it can be helpful to explore several different
models. These models enable us to look at a concept from a variety of different perspectives. There is no
one-size-fits-all to explain organizational behavior. Instead, the behaviors exhibited are the result of
interactions between multiple variables that are also influenced by the level of analysis. So, before we delve
into the models themselves, one must understand the variables involved and the different levels of analyses
that come together to form the models.
Types of Variables
There are three types of variables involved in creating an organizational model. These variables include
inputs ...
Reply 2 to DRGOI think self -monitoring is how we evaluate ourse.docxsodhi3
Reply 2 to DRGO
I think self -monitoring is how we evaluate ourselves and is a way to make us better. If we were to truly monitor, correct the faults that we see, and build on our strengths on some of the critical traits for locus of control, how we perceive ourselves and others, self-efficacy, attitude and self-esteem we could change our weaker areas. "Locus of control deals with the degree to which people feel accountable for their own behaviors"(The Saylor Foundation, 2017). Locus of control discusses the internal and external locus of control. Internal means that you are the reason something is happening and external is saying that something else caused this to happen. "Perception may be defined as the process with which individuals detect and interpret environmental stimuli"(The Saylor Foundation, 2017). The three areas of perception are visual, Self and social. A persons perception might not always be as they think it is and might cause them to judge another person the wrong way by misunderstanding their actions. I think self perception has to do with the way people are and depends a lot on how they grew up. It plays a large part in their self esteem, whether they are approachable, social or just like to keep to themselves. "Self-efficacy is a belief that one can perform a specific task successfully"(The Saylor Foundation, 2017). Everyone does not have this ability, but the ones that do are usually successful when trying new things and getting the job done above the standard. I think that this is crucial in any organization, especially the Army. We are always getting new tasks, promotion, and missions that we have never done before that if we fail have a lot of consequences. Failure cannot be in our thought process. Understanding this in the work place will help with the dynamics that come a long with a lot of different personalities. You shouldn't be quick to judge others by getting the wrong perception. Helping yourself and others understand this will build a stronger organization and team within that organization.
Reply 2 to TRGR
Locus of control, self-esteem, self-efficacy, self-monitoring, and attitudes and perception make-up a sort of melting pot of how one behaves. Locus of control describes the level of accountability people assume in regard to their behavior, (Saylor Foundation, 2017). Self-esteem is described as how a person feels about themselves, (Saylor Foundation, 2017). Perception is how individuals “detect and interpret environmental stimuli, (Saylor Foundation, 2017). Finally, self-efficacy refers to the belief an individual has that they can perform a specific task specifically, (Saylor Foundation, 2017). Depending upon the levels of these concepts that the individual possesses is the result of how one is able to self-monitor their actions in a number of situations, (Saylor Foundation, 2017). For example, a person with high self-esteem is likely to have much higher job satisfaction and performance. Relative to self-mo ...
Perception of job performance appraisals toward turnover intention and job sa...Alexander Decker
This document summarizes a research journal article that examines the relationship between perceptions of job performance appraisals, turnover intentions, and job satisfaction. The study was conducted among marketing employees in pharmaceutical companies in Pakistan. The researchers hypothesized that perceived politics in performance appraisals would be negatively related to job satisfaction and positively related to turnover intentions. Data was collected through questionnaires measuring perceptions of performance appraisal politics, organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover intentions. The results supported the hypotheses, finding that perceived politics in performance appraisals predicted lower job satisfaction and higher turnover intentions among employees.
1Running Head NATURE OF WORK 7NATURE OF WORK .docxnovabroom
1
Running Head: NATURE OF WORK
7
NATURE OF WORK
NATURE OF WORK
Claudia Rangel
CCMH 540 week 1
Career and Vocational Counseling
Mrs. Cinthya Yaptangco
November 14, 2018
The nature of work has changed considerably over time with various factors being attributed to this change. The first way in which the nature of work has changed over time is through the advent of more advanced technologies with the progression of history. Today technological breakthroughs for instance in robotics, artificial intelligence, microelectronics, computer-integrated assembly, and manufacturing. Moreover, the proliferation in digital telecommunications depicted in the global reach of the Internet have all impacted the nature of work throughout the generations of their creation (National Research Council, 1999). These new technologies have made the nature of work to shift from being predominantly physically intensive to being more intellectually challenging with more emphasis being placed on an individual’s technical ability rather than their physical capacities.
The second way in which the nature of the work has also experienced change over time is through the effect of the demographic constitution of the workforce. These have become evident in the increasing presence of women in the workplace, the enhancement in the levels of cultural diversity in the workplace, and improvements in the education levels of the workforce. These factors have worked over the progression of time in changing the nature of vocation (National Research Council, 1999). These changes in the demography of the workforce have the led to a alteration in the forms of work since the labor market can get a more skilled workforce. Through the greater inclusivity of the hiring criteria, the improved educational qualifications of the workforce among other factors have helped in making the workplace to be more conducive and accommodating with the progression of time.
There have been significant changes in the attitudes towards work seen amongst people from different generations through the progression of time. The leading cause of conflict in the workplace, between generations, has been attributed to the perceived decline in the work ethic with the progress of time. For example generation, X has been tagged as the ‘lazy’ generation (Adams, 2000). The employers have made the complaint that younger workers do not display commitment in their output and only work the required hours and rarely go beyond its limits. The boomer's generation is known to be workaholics and is known to have started the trend. In addition to this, the traditional attitude to work has been in the description that they are the hardest working generation.
The nature of the relationship between work and personal life is often left unexamined because most people prefer to separate these two areas of their lives and to treat them as separate entities. Despite this, various connections have been found between the activities t.
What is organizational citizenship behavior (autosaved)Shashwat Shankar
Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB) refers to discretionary behaviors by employees that are not required as part of their job but benefit the organization. These behaviors include altruism, courtesy, sportsmanship, conscientiousness, and civic virtue. Research found OCB to be positively related across manufacturing, banking, and IT organizations and that strengthening organizational culture can foster OCB. Perceptions of job insecurity may encourage behaviors intended to appear beneficial to the organization but that could be unethical. HR managers should be aware of this risk for employees feeling insecure.
Dimensions and Characteristics of Organizational Behavior Impact and Competit...ijtsrd
The study of organizational behavior gives insight into how staff members behave and perform in the work environment. It helps us develop an understanding of the facets that can motivate staff members, enhance their efficiency, and help organizations establish a solid and also trusting relationship with their staff members. Human actions are inherent in each person which indicates his features, his way of behaving as well as assuming are his very own attributes while business actions are a group or company society special of each very own felt and also done. The study of Organizational Behavior OB is really intriguing as well as challenging too. It is related to individuals, a team of individuals collaborating in teams. The research ends up being a lot more challenging when situational factors connect. The research of organizational behavior connects to the expected behavior of an individual in the organization. No two individuals are likely to behave in the same manner in a certain work circumstance. It is the predictability of a supervisor concerning the expected behavior of an individual. There are no absolutes in human behavior. It is the human variable that is contributing to the performance hence the study of human practices is very important. Great value consequently must be affixed to the study. Dr. J. Jose Prabhu "Dimensions and Characteristics of Organizational Behavior: Impact and Competitive Advantage" Published in International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (ijtsrd), ISSN: 2456-6470, Volume-4 | Issue-3 , April 2020, URL: https://www.ijtsrd.com/papers/ijtsrd30632.pdf Paper Url :https://www.ijtsrd.com/management/organizational-behaviour/30632/dimensions-and-characteristics-of-organizational-behavior-impact-and-competitive-advantage/dr-j-jose-prabhu
A study on organisational citizenship behaviour and organisational commitmenIAEME Publication
This study examined the relationship between organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) and organizational commitment among employees. It found a moderate level of citizenship behavior but a low level of organizational commitment. There was a significant positive relationship between OCB and organizational commitment, such that higher levels of commitment were associated with increased citizenship behaviors by employees that benefit the organization. The study utilized surveys to assess OCB and commitment among 120 employees of an Indian energy company.
This document presents a conceptual framework for how organizational culture is determined and impacts an organization. It is determined by transformational leadership and organizational communication media. Organizational culture then impacts motivation, organizational commitment, job satisfaction, engagement, job involvement, innovation, organizational citizenship behavior, productivity, and performance within an organization. The framework was developed through a literature review to establish how these factors relate and influence one another.
Chapter-1 What is Organizational Behavior
From Robbins and Judge, Organizational Behavior
This will help students. Please share your feed back so that i can improve.
Organizational behaviour involves the design of work as well as the psychological, emotional and interpersonal behavioural dynamics that influence organizational performance. Management as a discipline concerned with the study of overseeing activities and supervising people to perform specific tasks is crucial in organizational behaviour and corporate effectiveness. Management emphasizes the design, implementation and arrangement of various administrative and organizational systems for corporate effectiveness. While the individuals, and groups bring their skills, knowledge, values, motives, and attitudes into the organization, and thereby influencing it, the organization, on the other hand, modifies or restructures the individuals and groups through its structure, culture, policies, politics, power, and procedures, and the roles expected to be played by the people in the organization. This study conducted through the exploratory research design involved 125 participants, and result showed strong positive relationship between the variables of interest. The study was never exhaustive due to limitations in terms of time and current relevant literature, therefore, further study could examine the relationship between personality characteristics and performance in the public sector, where productivity is not outstanding, when compared with the private sector. Based on the result of this investigation it was recommended that organizations should provide emotional intelligence programmes for their membership as an important pattern of increasing co-operative behaviours and corporate effectiveness.
This document provides an overview of organizational behavior and its historical development. It describes how scientific management in the early 1900s focused on increasing productivity. This was followed by the human relations movement which emphasized helping and guiding employees. Modern organizational behavior draws from various fields like psychology, sociology, and management to study people and organizations in a more holistic way.
Organizational behavior is the study of how individuals, groups, and structures influence behavior within organizations to improve effectiveness. It draws from psychology, sociology, social psychology, and anthropology. Key topics include individual attributes and attitudes, group dynamics, and organizational culture and change. Understanding organizational behavior helps predict behavior, influence employees, and enhance organizational performance.
SOCW 6070-week 3 discussion 1 responses Respond to at least .docxsamuel699872
SOCW 6070-week 3 discussion 1 responses
Respond to at least two colleagues separately by addressing an example in each colleague’s post in at least one of the following ways:
Suggest a strategy for addressing a situation that your colleague described in one of his or her examples.
Offer additional thoughts regarding the impact of the interaction described in the example.
Peer 1 Discussion to respond to
Jasmine Dixon
RE: Discussion 1 - Week 3
Top of Form
Personal Leadership Philosophy and Style
Individual attributes that have an impact on leadership skills and knowledge: general cognitive ability, crystallized cognitive ability, motivation, and personality. These attributes play important roles in the skills model. Complex problem solving is a very difficult process and becomes more difficult as people move up in the organization. These attributes support people as they apply their leadership competencies. A social worker administrator personal leadership and style may influence the environment of the organization, well as how efficient the organization will operate. With an administrator who has positive leadership philosophy and style the organization can benefit in a positive way to achieve their goals. However, an administrator with a negative style and philosophy might have a negative influence and therefore experience internal issues within the organization amongst staff, therefore making it difficult to achieve their goals (Northouse, 2021).
Influence of Organization’s Culture
Internal environmental influences affecting leadership performance can include such factors as technology, facilities, expertise of subordinates, and communication. For example, an aging factory or one lacking in high-speed technology could have a major impact on the nature of problem-solving activities. Another example might be the skill levels of followers: If a leader’s followers are highly competent, they will definitely improve the group’s problem solving and performance. Similarly, if a task is particularly complex or a group’s communication poor, the leader’s performance will be affected (Northouse, 2021). All of the factors listed could be potential factors that are needed for the administrator to function properly in their roles.
Interactions with Stakeholders
A stakeholder model of organizational leadership presumes that leadership emerges from and influences those stakeholders in an organization’s environment on which it is dependent (e.g., donors) or with which it is significantly interdependent (like those it collaborates with in service delivery) Such authority is used to encourage, facilitate, and guide process, rather than to direct action that is aimed at specific outcomes (Lauffer, 2011).
Positive interaction with stakeholders is needed in order for the organization to properly serve their clients. This can include effectively communicating in order to address the needs and the concerns of their clients. These interactions can de.
This document summarizes an interview methodology for a research study on perceived injustices during organizational change. The study will interview 48 people from different organizations who experienced change as either recipients or leaders. Participants will be asked 10 questions about their perceptions of fairness in the change process and whether these perceptions caused any emotional responses. Responses will be analyzed to understand the relationship between perceived injustices like distributive, procedural, informational, and interpersonal injustices and the negative emotions they provoke. The goal is to learn how perceived injustices influence change recipients and leaders. Interviews will last 20-30 minutes and follow semi-structured protocols to collect detailed accounts of changes and their impacts.
16Personal Consequences of Employee CommitmentUniversity o.docxdrennanmicah
1
6
Personal Consequences of Employee Commitment
University of Maryland Eastern Shore
Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for Course #xxxx
Title
Professor
Date
Journal:
Personal consequences of employee commitment. Academy of
Management Journal, 32(3), 649-661.
Date:
1989
Author(s):
Romzek, B., S.
Introduction
The purpose of the study was to examine the positive or negative consequences of employee commitment on nonwork and career satisfactions with the central hypotheses as positive. The study analyses used panel data that tested the effects of employee commitment on satisfaction with nonwork and career progress. Findings support that organizational involvement has positive consequences for individuals.
Hypothesis and Research Question:
The author submitted two hypotheses that tested for positive or negative consequences of employee commitment on nonwork and career satisfactions. Controlling for family involvement and age, the author’s first hypotheses tested to determine if employee commitment would have positive consequences for individuals’ nonwork satisfaction. The second hypotheses tested to determine if employee commitment would have positive consequences for individuals’ satisfaction with their career progress and future prospects.
Method/Type of Study
Research Design
The research design was a quantitative cross-sectional two-wave panel study conducted in 1982 and 1984 respectively.
Research Participants
The study surveyed a random sample of 484 respondents in the first wave of the survey which took place in 1982. The same respondents were contacted for the second wave in 1984 and resulted in 368 of the original individuals responding. The original sample was drawn from personnel listings solicited through nine public agencies; three federal offices, three state offices, and three local governments based in the states of Kansas and Missouri. The author noted that the “agencies represented diversity in the level of government, scope of services provided, and size and constituted an availability sample.” Other than collecting data on age as a control variable, the author did not indicate additional demographic information as being collected for study purposes. Without the data, it is very difficult to determine if the findings can be generalized to the population.
Instrumentation
Organizational involvement was the concept used to measure employee commitment. The author employed a customized measurement instrument adapted from separate scales developed by Etzioni (1975) for organizational involvement; Romzek (1985) for organizational alienation; and Hall, Schneider and Nygren (1970) and Buchanan (1974) for positive psychological attachment. The resultant organizational involvement scale had a Cronbach alpha of .77. Nonwork satisfaction was adapted from a scale developed by the National Opinion Research Center. The five-item Likert format measured the extent o which individuals report being satisfied wi.
^ Acadumy of Management Journal2001. Vol. 44. No. 2. 219-237.docxhanneloremccaffery
^ Acadumy of Management Journal
2001. Vol. 44. No. 2. 219-237.
A SOCIAL CAPITAL THEORY OF CAREER SUCCESS
SCOTT E. SEIBERT
MARIA L. KRAIMER
•̂ ' ' ' Cleveland State University
ROBERT C. LIDEN
University of Illinois at Chicago
A model integrating competing theories of social capital with research on career
success was developed and tested in a sample of 448 employees with various occupa-
tions and organizations. Social capital was conceptualized in terms of network struc-
ture and social resources. Results of structural equation modeling showed that net-
work structure was related to social resources and that the effects of social resources
on career success were hilly mediated by three network benelits: access to information,
access to resources, and career sponsorship.
Organizational researchers have begun to de-
velop increasingly comprehensive models of career
success using demographic, human capital, work-
family, motivational, organizational, and industry
variables (e.g., Dreher & Ash, 1990; Judge & Bretz,
1994: Judge, Cable. Boudreau, & Bretz. 1995; Kirch-
meyer, 1998). Although this work has provided
considerable evidence regarding the determinants
of career outcomes, the roles of informal interper-
sonal behaviors have not been fully explored (Judge
& Bretz, 1994; Pfeffer, 1989). Popular advice for
getting ahead in one's career rarely fails to mention
the importance of networking for the achievement
of career goals (e.g., Bolles, 1992; Kanter, 1977).
Indeed, Luthans, Hodgetts, and Rosenkrantz (1988)
found that the most successful managers in their
study spent 70 percent more time engaged in net-
working activities and 10 percent more time en-
gaged in routine communication activities than
their less successful counterparts. Recent advances
in social capital theory (Coleman, 1990) have begun
to provide a finer-grained analysis of the ways in-
dividuals' social networks affect their careers in
organizations (Burt, 1992, 1997; Ibarra, 1995;
Podolny & Baron, 1997; Sparrowe & Popielarz,
1995). This theoretical perspective has the poten-
Data were collected and the manuscript was submitted
and processed while Scott E. Seibert was in the Manage-
ment Department at the University of Notre Dame and
Maria L. Kraimer was a graduate student at the Univer-
sity of Illinois at Chicago. Support for this project was
provided by the Management Department at the Univer-
sity of Notre Dame and the Alumni Office of the Univer-
sity of Notre Dame. The current investigation is part of a
larger study of career success.
tial to considerably enhance scholars' knowledge of
the role of social processes in career success.
The first purpose of the current study was to
integrate the current conceptualizations of social
capital as they pertain to career success. Tbree dif-
ferent theoretical approaches—weak tie theory
(Granovetter, 1973), structural hole theory (Burt,
1992), and social resource theory (Lin, 1990)—
focus on different network properties as r.
Post #1Employee empowerment has allowed organizations to have qu.docxharrisonhoward80223
Post #1
Employee empowerment has allowed organizations to have quicker response times to customers for resolutions, but my thoughts of this quick solution being beneficial shifted as I read Senge’s studies. “Today, many executives are articulating a new philosophy revolving around ‘empowering people.’ But few organizations are working hard to introduce tools and methods to actually help people to make more intelligent decisions, especially decisions that improve systemwide performance” (Senge, Kleiner, Roberts, Ross, & Smith, 1994, p. 40). It is important for organizations to consider the impact of the training systems, as well as how to evaluate their effectiveness. Without the proper ‘tools’ it is difficult for employees to make decisions that are best for both the business and the customer. This also makes it difficult for leaders to be confident in backing their employees decisions or in holding them accountable to the decisions made when effective learning systems were not developed prior to training. “Once we learn to distinguish our assumptions from the ‘data’ upon which those assumptions are based, we are forever more aware of our own thinking” (Senge, Kleiner, Roberts, Ross, & Smith, 1994, p. 43).
“Motivation also appears to be an important correlate of leadership” (Vidic, Burton, South, Pickering, & Start, 2016). By utilizing the teachings of each section and putting them into practice within real life situations I can support my learning while also utilizing success stories of the implementation of my practices of the materials to share with the class for discussions. Many of the teachings discussed in this week’s material would work for the current organization I work for. Senge mentions situations where employees are placed into quick training courses that only last a few days, but later the training is not reinforced or further developed upon. Organizations will then give up on the current training practices as they believe them not to be effective. In the organization I work for there is always change. Changes in culture, leadership, and even training styles. There is an opportunity to evaluate the importance of each change prior to implementation and utilize different metrics to evaluate success which could include quantity, but most importantly quality of the results with the success of the organization.
References
Senge, P., Kleiner, A., Roberts, C., Ross, R., & Smith, B. (1994). The fifth discipline fieldbook: strategies and tools for building a learning organization. New York: Doubleday.
Vidic, Z., Burton, D., South, G., Pickering, A. M., & Start, A. (2016). Emotional and Motivational Correlates of Leadership Styles: A Comprehensive Framework for Understanding Effective Leaders. Journal Of Leadership Studies, (3), 22. doi:10.1002/jls.21485
Post #2
I found it interesting how Kleiner, Roberts, Ross , Senge & Smith (1994) discussed team development as a learning organization. They note that team members “develop new skill.
Analyzing The Organizational Behavior Chart ElementsAllison Koehn
This document provides an analysis of organizational behavior concepts. It begins with definitions of key terms like organization, organizational behavior, human resources, and stress. It then explores topics like perception, personality, emotions, values, attitudes, diversity, and stress. It examines how these concepts impact individual and group behavior within organizations. The document aims to explain organizational behavior concepts for the purpose of improving organizational effectiveness.
This document summarizes a research study that examined the influence of person-organization fit and transformational leadership on self-awareness, resilience, and organizational citizenship behavior among lecturers in South Sulawesi, Indonesia. The study found that:
1. Person-organization fit positively influences self-awareness, resilience, and organizational citizenship behavior of lecturers.
2. Transformational leadership positively influences resilience and organizational citizenship behavior of lecturers, but does not influence their self-awareness.
3. Self-awareness positively influences resilience and organizational citizenship behavior of lecturers.
4. Resilience positively influences organizational citizenship behavior of lecturers.
The study recommends that higher education institutions
This document discusses positive organizational behavior (POB) from a cross-cultural perspective. It begins by noting that POB principles have become more prevalent in workplaces as a way to enhance employee morale and competitiveness during difficult economic times. The document then reviews literature showing links between POB concepts like hope, resilience, and strengths-based approaches, and improved employee performance, effectiveness, and satisfaction. It argues that focusing on amplifying positive attributes in organizations, rather than just reducing negatives, can lead to better financial and other performance. The document also examines cross-cultural studies finding universal values of work and its relationship to life fulfillment and priorities, while also noting differences in work goals and orientations across countries. Overall, it
This document is an acknowledgement section for a research project. It thanks four individuals - Dr. Lois Farquharson, Dr. David White, Dr. Felix Chan, and the author's wife Jusy - for their various contributions to the success of the project. It recognizes Dr. Farquharson for her guidance, Dr. White for his creative suggestions, Dr. Chan for monitoring the project workflow, and the author's wife for her constant love and support. The document then outlines the contents of the research paper, which includes chapters on introduction, literature review, research methods, data analysis, conclusion, appendices, and references.
Human relations and interpersonal skills are important for organizations to achieve their objectives through effective teamwork and satisfying both organizational and personal needs. The development of human relations and organizational behavior has progressed from a focus on improving poor working conditions during the Industrial Revolution to extensive research studies from various disciplines that help explain and improve human behavior in organizations. Key studies including the Hawthorne Experiments, McGregor's Theory X and Theory Y, and Ouchi's Theory Z provided frameworks to better understand employee motivation and organizational performance.
This chapter reviews literature on factors that affect the performance of nursing staff. It discusses individual factors like motivation, perceptions and work experience. Organizational factors include management support, communication, and working conditions. Social factors involve community expectations and cultural values. Theoretical frameworks identify these factors and their influence on performance. The review forms a performance model to guide the study in developing strategies to enhance nursing staff performance.
The document discusses the field of engineering psychology and human factors. It provides an overview of the history and goals of the field, which aims to optimize interactions between humans and machines by considering human abilities and limitations in design. Some key topics covered include time-motion studies, principles of workspace and control design, and types of visual, auditory, and tactile displays. The overall purpose of engineering psychology is to apply psychological knowledge to improve safety, performance and satisfaction in person-machine systems.
This document discusses workplace stress and stress management. It describes stress as physiological and psychological responses to unpleasant stimulation or threatening events. Prolonged stress can lead to physical and mental health issues. The document outlines various stressors in the workplace like work overload, organizational change, and role ambiguity. It also discusses individual differences in stress responses and effective stress management programs and strategies.
More Related Content
Similar to Workplace Social Self-Efficacy Journal of Career Assessment-2013-Fan-91-110.pdf
Dimensions and Characteristics of Organizational Behavior Impact and Competit...ijtsrd
The study of organizational behavior gives insight into how staff members behave and perform in the work environment. It helps us develop an understanding of the facets that can motivate staff members, enhance their efficiency, and help organizations establish a solid and also trusting relationship with their staff members. Human actions are inherent in each person which indicates his features, his way of behaving as well as assuming are his very own attributes while business actions are a group or company society special of each very own felt and also done. The study of Organizational Behavior OB is really intriguing as well as challenging too. It is related to individuals, a team of individuals collaborating in teams. The research ends up being a lot more challenging when situational factors connect. The research of organizational behavior connects to the expected behavior of an individual in the organization. No two individuals are likely to behave in the same manner in a certain work circumstance. It is the predictability of a supervisor concerning the expected behavior of an individual. There are no absolutes in human behavior. It is the human variable that is contributing to the performance hence the study of human practices is very important. Great value consequently must be affixed to the study. Dr. J. Jose Prabhu "Dimensions and Characteristics of Organizational Behavior: Impact and Competitive Advantage" Published in International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (ijtsrd), ISSN: 2456-6470, Volume-4 | Issue-3 , April 2020, URL: https://www.ijtsrd.com/papers/ijtsrd30632.pdf Paper Url :https://www.ijtsrd.com/management/organizational-behaviour/30632/dimensions-and-characteristics-of-organizational-behavior-impact-and-competitive-advantage/dr-j-jose-prabhu
A study on organisational citizenship behaviour and organisational commitmenIAEME Publication
This study examined the relationship between organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) and organizational commitment among employees. It found a moderate level of citizenship behavior but a low level of organizational commitment. There was a significant positive relationship between OCB and organizational commitment, such that higher levels of commitment were associated with increased citizenship behaviors by employees that benefit the organization. The study utilized surveys to assess OCB and commitment among 120 employees of an Indian energy company.
This document presents a conceptual framework for how organizational culture is determined and impacts an organization. It is determined by transformational leadership and organizational communication media. Organizational culture then impacts motivation, organizational commitment, job satisfaction, engagement, job involvement, innovation, organizational citizenship behavior, productivity, and performance within an organization. The framework was developed through a literature review to establish how these factors relate and influence one another.
Chapter-1 What is Organizational Behavior
From Robbins and Judge, Organizational Behavior
This will help students. Please share your feed back so that i can improve.
Organizational behaviour involves the design of work as well as the psychological, emotional and interpersonal behavioural dynamics that influence organizational performance. Management as a discipline concerned with the study of overseeing activities and supervising people to perform specific tasks is crucial in organizational behaviour and corporate effectiveness. Management emphasizes the design, implementation and arrangement of various administrative and organizational systems for corporate effectiveness. While the individuals, and groups bring their skills, knowledge, values, motives, and attitudes into the organization, and thereby influencing it, the organization, on the other hand, modifies or restructures the individuals and groups through its structure, culture, policies, politics, power, and procedures, and the roles expected to be played by the people in the organization. This study conducted through the exploratory research design involved 125 participants, and result showed strong positive relationship between the variables of interest. The study was never exhaustive due to limitations in terms of time and current relevant literature, therefore, further study could examine the relationship between personality characteristics and performance in the public sector, where productivity is not outstanding, when compared with the private sector. Based on the result of this investigation it was recommended that organizations should provide emotional intelligence programmes for their membership as an important pattern of increasing co-operative behaviours and corporate effectiveness.
This document provides an overview of organizational behavior and its historical development. It describes how scientific management in the early 1900s focused on increasing productivity. This was followed by the human relations movement which emphasized helping and guiding employees. Modern organizational behavior draws from various fields like psychology, sociology, and management to study people and organizations in a more holistic way.
Organizational behavior is the study of how individuals, groups, and structures influence behavior within organizations to improve effectiveness. It draws from psychology, sociology, social psychology, and anthropology. Key topics include individual attributes and attitudes, group dynamics, and organizational culture and change. Understanding organizational behavior helps predict behavior, influence employees, and enhance organizational performance.
SOCW 6070-week 3 discussion 1 responses Respond to at least .docxsamuel699872
SOCW 6070-week 3 discussion 1 responses
Respond to at least two colleagues separately by addressing an example in each colleague’s post in at least one of the following ways:
Suggest a strategy for addressing a situation that your colleague described in one of his or her examples.
Offer additional thoughts regarding the impact of the interaction described in the example.
Peer 1 Discussion to respond to
Jasmine Dixon
RE: Discussion 1 - Week 3
Top of Form
Personal Leadership Philosophy and Style
Individual attributes that have an impact on leadership skills and knowledge: general cognitive ability, crystallized cognitive ability, motivation, and personality. These attributes play important roles in the skills model. Complex problem solving is a very difficult process and becomes more difficult as people move up in the organization. These attributes support people as they apply their leadership competencies. A social worker administrator personal leadership and style may influence the environment of the organization, well as how efficient the organization will operate. With an administrator who has positive leadership philosophy and style the organization can benefit in a positive way to achieve their goals. However, an administrator with a negative style and philosophy might have a negative influence and therefore experience internal issues within the organization amongst staff, therefore making it difficult to achieve their goals (Northouse, 2021).
Influence of Organization’s Culture
Internal environmental influences affecting leadership performance can include such factors as technology, facilities, expertise of subordinates, and communication. For example, an aging factory or one lacking in high-speed technology could have a major impact on the nature of problem-solving activities. Another example might be the skill levels of followers: If a leader’s followers are highly competent, they will definitely improve the group’s problem solving and performance. Similarly, if a task is particularly complex or a group’s communication poor, the leader’s performance will be affected (Northouse, 2021). All of the factors listed could be potential factors that are needed for the administrator to function properly in their roles.
Interactions with Stakeholders
A stakeholder model of organizational leadership presumes that leadership emerges from and influences those stakeholders in an organization’s environment on which it is dependent (e.g., donors) or with which it is significantly interdependent (like those it collaborates with in service delivery) Such authority is used to encourage, facilitate, and guide process, rather than to direct action that is aimed at specific outcomes (Lauffer, 2011).
Positive interaction with stakeholders is needed in order for the organization to properly serve their clients. This can include effectively communicating in order to address the needs and the concerns of their clients. These interactions can de.
This document summarizes an interview methodology for a research study on perceived injustices during organizational change. The study will interview 48 people from different organizations who experienced change as either recipients or leaders. Participants will be asked 10 questions about their perceptions of fairness in the change process and whether these perceptions caused any emotional responses. Responses will be analyzed to understand the relationship between perceived injustices like distributive, procedural, informational, and interpersonal injustices and the negative emotions they provoke. The goal is to learn how perceived injustices influence change recipients and leaders. Interviews will last 20-30 minutes and follow semi-structured protocols to collect detailed accounts of changes and their impacts.
16Personal Consequences of Employee CommitmentUniversity o.docxdrennanmicah
1
6
Personal Consequences of Employee Commitment
University of Maryland Eastern Shore
Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for Course #xxxx
Title
Professor
Date
Journal:
Personal consequences of employee commitment. Academy of
Management Journal, 32(3), 649-661.
Date:
1989
Author(s):
Romzek, B., S.
Introduction
The purpose of the study was to examine the positive or negative consequences of employee commitment on nonwork and career satisfactions with the central hypotheses as positive. The study analyses used panel data that tested the effects of employee commitment on satisfaction with nonwork and career progress. Findings support that organizational involvement has positive consequences for individuals.
Hypothesis and Research Question:
The author submitted two hypotheses that tested for positive or negative consequences of employee commitment on nonwork and career satisfactions. Controlling for family involvement and age, the author’s first hypotheses tested to determine if employee commitment would have positive consequences for individuals’ nonwork satisfaction. The second hypotheses tested to determine if employee commitment would have positive consequences for individuals’ satisfaction with their career progress and future prospects.
Method/Type of Study
Research Design
The research design was a quantitative cross-sectional two-wave panel study conducted in 1982 and 1984 respectively.
Research Participants
The study surveyed a random sample of 484 respondents in the first wave of the survey which took place in 1982. The same respondents were contacted for the second wave in 1984 and resulted in 368 of the original individuals responding. The original sample was drawn from personnel listings solicited through nine public agencies; three federal offices, three state offices, and three local governments based in the states of Kansas and Missouri. The author noted that the “agencies represented diversity in the level of government, scope of services provided, and size and constituted an availability sample.” Other than collecting data on age as a control variable, the author did not indicate additional demographic information as being collected for study purposes. Without the data, it is very difficult to determine if the findings can be generalized to the population.
Instrumentation
Organizational involvement was the concept used to measure employee commitment. The author employed a customized measurement instrument adapted from separate scales developed by Etzioni (1975) for organizational involvement; Romzek (1985) for organizational alienation; and Hall, Schneider and Nygren (1970) and Buchanan (1974) for positive psychological attachment. The resultant organizational involvement scale had a Cronbach alpha of .77. Nonwork satisfaction was adapted from a scale developed by the National Opinion Research Center. The five-item Likert format measured the extent o which individuals report being satisfied wi.
^ Acadumy of Management Journal2001. Vol. 44. No. 2. 219-237.docxhanneloremccaffery
^ Acadumy of Management Journal
2001. Vol. 44. No. 2. 219-237.
A SOCIAL CAPITAL THEORY OF CAREER SUCCESS
SCOTT E. SEIBERT
MARIA L. KRAIMER
•̂ ' ' ' Cleveland State University
ROBERT C. LIDEN
University of Illinois at Chicago
A model integrating competing theories of social capital with research on career
success was developed and tested in a sample of 448 employees with various occupa-
tions and organizations. Social capital was conceptualized in terms of network struc-
ture and social resources. Results of structural equation modeling showed that net-
work structure was related to social resources and that the effects of social resources
on career success were hilly mediated by three network benelits: access to information,
access to resources, and career sponsorship.
Organizational researchers have begun to de-
velop increasingly comprehensive models of career
success using demographic, human capital, work-
family, motivational, organizational, and industry
variables (e.g., Dreher & Ash, 1990; Judge & Bretz,
1994: Judge, Cable. Boudreau, & Bretz. 1995; Kirch-
meyer, 1998). Although this work has provided
considerable evidence regarding the determinants
of career outcomes, the roles of informal interper-
sonal behaviors have not been fully explored (Judge
& Bretz, 1994; Pfeffer, 1989). Popular advice for
getting ahead in one's career rarely fails to mention
the importance of networking for the achievement
of career goals (e.g., Bolles, 1992; Kanter, 1977).
Indeed, Luthans, Hodgetts, and Rosenkrantz (1988)
found that the most successful managers in their
study spent 70 percent more time engaged in net-
working activities and 10 percent more time en-
gaged in routine communication activities than
their less successful counterparts. Recent advances
in social capital theory (Coleman, 1990) have begun
to provide a finer-grained analysis of the ways in-
dividuals' social networks affect their careers in
organizations (Burt, 1992, 1997; Ibarra, 1995;
Podolny & Baron, 1997; Sparrowe & Popielarz,
1995). This theoretical perspective has the poten-
Data were collected and the manuscript was submitted
and processed while Scott E. Seibert was in the Manage-
ment Department at the University of Notre Dame and
Maria L. Kraimer was a graduate student at the Univer-
sity of Illinois at Chicago. Support for this project was
provided by the Management Department at the Univer-
sity of Notre Dame and the Alumni Office of the Univer-
sity of Notre Dame. The current investigation is part of a
larger study of career success.
tial to considerably enhance scholars' knowledge of
the role of social processes in career success.
The first purpose of the current study was to
integrate the current conceptualizations of social
capital as they pertain to career success. Tbree dif-
ferent theoretical approaches—weak tie theory
(Granovetter, 1973), structural hole theory (Burt,
1992), and social resource theory (Lin, 1990)—
focus on different network properties as r.
Post #1Employee empowerment has allowed organizations to have qu.docxharrisonhoward80223
Post #1
Employee empowerment has allowed organizations to have quicker response times to customers for resolutions, but my thoughts of this quick solution being beneficial shifted as I read Senge’s studies. “Today, many executives are articulating a new philosophy revolving around ‘empowering people.’ But few organizations are working hard to introduce tools and methods to actually help people to make more intelligent decisions, especially decisions that improve systemwide performance” (Senge, Kleiner, Roberts, Ross, & Smith, 1994, p. 40). It is important for organizations to consider the impact of the training systems, as well as how to evaluate their effectiveness. Without the proper ‘tools’ it is difficult for employees to make decisions that are best for both the business and the customer. This also makes it difficult for leaders to be confident in backing their employees decisions or in holding them accountable to the decisions made when effective learning systems were not developed prior to training. “Once we learn to distinguish our assumptions from the ‘data’ upon which those assumptions are based, we are forever more aware of our own thinking” (Senge, Kleiner, Roberts, Ross, & Smith, 1994, p. 43).
“Motivation also appears to be an important correlate of leadership” (Vidic, Burton, South, Pickering, & Start, 2016). By utilizing the teachings of each section and putting them into practice within real life situations I can support my learning while also utilizing success stories of the implementation of my practices of the materials to share with the class for discussions. Many of the teachings discussed in this week’s material would work for the current organization I work for. Senge mentions situations where employees are placed into quick training courses that only last a few days, but later the training is not reinforced or further developed upon. Organizations will then give up on the current training practices as they believe them not to be effective. In the organization I work for there is always change. Changes in culture, leadership, and even training styles. There is an opportunity to evaluate the importance of each change prior to implementation and utilize different metrics to evaluate success which could include quantity, but most importantly quality of the results with the success of the organization.
References
Senge, P., Kleiner, A., Roberts, C., Ross, R., & Smith, B. (1994). The fifth discipline fieldbook: strategies and tools for building a learning organization. New York: Doubleday.
Vidic, Z., Burton, D., South, G., Pickering, A. M., & Start, A. (2016). Emotional and Motivational Correlates of Leadership Styles: A Comprehensive Framework for Understanding Effective Leaders. Journal Of Leadership Studies, (3), 22. doi:10.1002/jls.21485
Post #2
I found it interesting how Kleiner, Roberts, Ross , Senge & Smith (1994) discussed team development as a learning organization. They note that team members “develop new skill.
Analyzing The Organizational Behavior Chart ElementsAllison Koehn
This document provides an analysis of organizational behavior concepts. It begins with definitions of key terms like organization, organizational behavior, human resources, and stress. It then explores topics like perception, personality, emotions, values, attitudes, diversity, and stress. It examines how these concepts impact individual and group behavior within organizations. The document aims to explain organizational behavior concepts for the purpose of improving organizational effectiveness.
This document summarizes a research study that examined the influence of person-organization fit and transformational leadership on self-awareness, resilience, and organizational citizenship behavior among lecturers in South Sulawesi, Indonesia. The study found that:
1. Person-organization fit positively influences self-awareness, resilience, and organizational citizenship behavior of lecturers.
2. Transformational leadership positively influences resilience and organizational citizenship behavior of lecturers, but does not influence their self-awareness.
3. Self-awareness positively influences resilience and organizational citizenship behavior of lecturers.
4. Resilience positively influences organizational citizenship behavior of lecturers.
The study recommends that higher education institutions
This document discusses positive organizational behavior (POB) from a cross-cultural perspective. It begins by noting that POB principles have become more prevalent in workplaces as a way to enhance employee morale and competitiveness during difficult economic times. The document then reviews literature showing links between POB concepts like hope, resilience, and strengths-based approaches, and improved employee performance, effectiveness, and satisfaction. It argues that focusing on amplifying positive attributes in organizations, rather than just reducing negatives, can lead to better financial and other performance. The document also examines cross-cultural studies finding universal values of work and its relationship to life fulfillment and priorities, while also noting differences in work goals and orientations across countries. Overall, it
This document is an acknowledgement section for a research project. It thanks four individuals - Dr. Lois Farquharson, Dr. David White, Dr. Felix Chan, and the author's wife Jusy - for their various contributions to the success of the project. It recognizes Dr. Farquharson for her guidance, Dr. White for his creative suggestions, Dr. Chan for monitoring the project workflow, and the author's wife for her constant love and support. The document then outlines the contents of the research paper, which includes chapters on introduction, literature review, research methods, data analysis, conclusion, appendices, and references.
Human relations and interpersonal skills are important for organizations to achieve their objectives through effective teamwork and satisfying both organizational and personal needs. The development of human relations and organizational behavior has progressed from a focus on improving poor working conditions during the Industrial Revolution to extensive research studies from various disciplines that help explain and improve human behavior in organizations. Key studies including the Hawthorne Experiments, McGregor's Theory X and Theory Y, and Ouchi's Theory Z provided frameworks to better understand employee motivation and organizational performance.
This chapter reviews literature on factors that affect the performance of nursing staff. It discusses individual factors like motivation, perceptions and work experience. Organizational factors include management support, communication, and working conditions. Social factors involve community expectations and cultural values. Theoretical frameworks identify these factors and their influence on performance. The review forms a performance model to guide the study in developing strategies to enhance nursing staff performance.
Similar to Workplace Social Self-Efficacy Journal of Career Assessment-2013-Fan-91-110.pdf (20)
The document discusses the field of engineering psychology and human factors. It provides an overview of the history and goals of the field, which aims to optimize interactions between humans and machines by considering human abilities and limitations in design. Some key topics covered include time-motion studies, principles of workspace and control design, and types of visual, auditory, and tactile displays. The overall purpose of engineering psychology is to apply psychological knowledge to improve safety, performance and satisfaction in person-machine systems.
This document discusses workplace stress and stress management. It describes stress as physiological and psychological responses to unpleasant stimulation or threatening events. Prolonged stress can lead to physical and mental health issues. The document outlines various stressors in the workplace like work overload, organizational change, and role ambiguity. It also discusses individual differences in stress responses and effective stress management programs and strategies.
This document discusses physical and temporal working conditions and their impact on employee satisfaction, productivity and absenteeism. It covers topics like office design, lighting, noise, temperature and different work schedules. Alternative schedules like flexible hours, part-time work and four-day workweeks can help employees balance work and family responsibilities and lead to improved satisfaction and productivity for some workers. Physical factors in the workplace like lighting, noise and temperature also significantly impact employee attitudes and performance.
This document provides an overview of motivation theories and concepts related to job satisfaction. It begins with definitions of motivation and discusses both content and process theories of motivation, including achievement motivation theory, Maslow's needs hierarchy theory, Herzberg's two-factor theory, job characteristics theory, expectancy theory, equity theory, and goal-setting theory. It also covers job satisfaction, its measurement, relationship to job performance, and impact of job loss.
This document discusses leadership theories and styles. It covers contingency theory, path-goal theory, and leader-member exchange theory. It also describes different leadership styles like transformational and transactional. Additionally, it discusses characteristics of successful and unsuccessful leaders, as well as challenges faced by women and minorities in management positions.
This document discusses various topics relating to workplace training programs, including:
- The scope and goals of organizational training programs. McDonald's Hamburger University is provided as an example.
- Common training methods used in workplaces like on-the-job training, computer-assisted instruction, and role playing.
- Factors that influence learning like trainee attributes, the pre-training environment, principles of learning theory, and the need for feedback.
- The importance of evaluating training programs to determine their effectiveness.
This document summarizes key aspects of performance appraisal systems. It defines performance appraisal as the formal evaluation of employee performance for career decisions. It describes guidelines to ensure appraisal systems comply with anti-discrimination laws and discusses common rating errors like halo effects. It also outlines techniques to measure performance, including objective and subjective methods, and ways to improve effectiveness, such as reducing rating errors through training and feedback.
This document provides an overview of psychological testing in the workplace. It discusses key characteristics of psychological tests like standardization, objectivity, reliability and validity. It describes different types of tests including cognitive ability, interests, aptitudes and personality tests. It also covers issues around fair employment practices, test administration, problems with psychological testing and ethics. The overall purpose is to explain how psychological testing is used to select and evaluate employees.
This document discusses psychology and work. It covers topics like recruitment, selection processes, fair employment practices, job analysis, and influences on job preferences. The purpose is to explain important concepts in industrial and organizational psychology related to finding and selecting job applicants.
The document discusses research methods used in psychology and the workplace. It covers experimental and non-experimental methods like naturalistic observation, surveys, and web-based research. Experimental methods manipulate an independent variable to measure its effect on a dependent variable using control and experimental groups. Non-experimental methods observe behaviors without manipulation. The document also discusses research limitations, designing experiments, collecting and analyzing data through descriptive and inferential statistics, and meta-analysis.
The document is a chapter from an Industrial-Organizational (I-O) psychology textbook. It provides an overview of the field of I-O psychology, including its history, key topics, research methods, and contemporary challenges. Some of the major areas discussed include the origins of I-O psychology, the Hawthorne studies, psychological testing during World War I and II, common jobs and salaries for I-O psychologists, and problems faced in the field such as fraudulent practitioners.
This study examined career indecision among 397 managers and professionals at a large bank. The researchers developed a measure of career indecision and tested a model of its sources and outcomes. Through a factor analysis, they identified seven potential sources of career indecision. The model proposed that work/life experience, trait anxiety, and career assistance from the employer would indirectly influence career indecision through their effects on its sources. Sources like lack of self-knowledge were expected to directly impact career indecision status. Potential outcomes included negative work attitudes, life stress, and intentions to explore career options further. The study aimed to advance understanding of career indecision among employed adults versus student populations.
This document provides a proposal for a stress management group for single parents. It will focus on cognitive thinking, stress coping skills, and building a mutual support network. The number of single parents in Hong Kong has increased significantly in recent decades. Single parents face many stressors related to finances, parenting responsibilities, and emotional well-being after becoming a single parent. The group aims to help members reduce stress and improve their quality of life by learning skills like cognitive restructuring based on cognitive behavioral therapy principles.
This document discusses defining and measuring the trait of superstition. It begins by reviewing different definitions of superstition in the literature and outlines the goals of developing a clear definition and measurement scale. An exploratory qualitative study led the researchers to define superstition as unfounded half-beliefs that certain events or objects can bring good or bad luck. Several data collections were then used to develop a 27-item, 5-dimension scale to measure superstition. The scale dimensions are popular beliefs about good and bad fortune, belief in destiny, magical thinking, and defensive pessimism.
The Motivational Structure Questionnaire (MSQ) identifies problem drinkers' maladaptive motivational patterns that underlie their motivations for drinking alcohol. It does so by having respondents name their current concerns in major life areas and characterize each concern along dimensions that reveal the structure of their motivation. A computer program then generates quantitative indices and a motivational profile depicting the respondent's significant motivational features and problem areas. Administration takes 2-3 hours on average. The MSQ can help pinpoint problem drinkers' motivational issues to provide a basis for motivational counseling to change maladaptive patterns. It has been used in research concerned with motivational and volitional factors.
The document describes the development of the Belief in Good Luck (BIGL) Scale. Three studies provided evidence that there are reliable individual differences in beliefs about luck. Some people view luck as a stable force that influences events in their favor, while others see luck as random and unreliable. Belief in good luck was related to beliefs about chance but distinct from other constructs like optimism or self-esteem. The scale predicted positive expectations for outcomes associated with luck, suggesting irrational beliefs about luck can influence expectations of future success.
This document discusses social exchange theory and interdependence theory as they relate to relationships. It covers:
- People seek relationships that provide maximum rewards with minimum costs, and stay only if outcomes remain profitable. Satisfaction depends on outcomes exceeding our expectations.
- Comparison levels (CL) are the standards we use to judge relationship satisfaction, based on past relationship rewards. Comparison levels for alternatives (CLalt) are the best outcomes available elsewhere, determining how dependent we are on the current relationship.
- As time passes in a relationship, CL may rise while outcomes remain the same, risking taking the relationship for granted. CLalt increasing, such as from women's rights, can make relationships unhappier and less
This document discusses evidence-based approaches to facilitating career choices through decision theory. It presents several key aspects of career decision making, including the large amount of information and options to consider, the uncertainty involved, and non-cognitive influences. Several tools are proposed to help structure the complex career decision process, including the Career Decision-Making Difficulties Questionnaire (CDDQ) to assess an individual's challenges, and a three-stage model (PIC) to guide their decision making. The document also discusses developing and validating computer-assisted career guidance systems using theoretical knowledge and empirical methods.
This document discusses interdependence theory and its application to personal relationships. It contains the following key points:
1) Interdependence theory analyzes how people in relationships coordinate outcomes to maximize benefits for both partners, taking into account rewards, costs, comparisons to alternatives, and issues of fairness.
2) Relationships are most satisfying when rewards outweigh costs, outcomes meet or exceed expectations, and the relationship is perceived as fair. Commitment increases with satisfaction but people may stay in dissatisfying relationships due to investments, lack of alternatives, or moral commitments.
3) Self-disclosure, intimacy, power balances, conflict resolution styles, and accommodation versus neglect during dissatisfaction all impact relationship satisfaction and commitment over time according
This chapter discusses interdependence and roles in organizations. It covers types of interdependence like pooled, sequential, reciprocal, and comprehensive interdependence. It also discusses role taking and making, norms and role episodes, communication processes, socialization to new roles, and maintaining quality interpersonal relationships through concepts like equity theory. The key topics covered are types of interdependence, roles and norms, communication barriers, socialization goals and tactics, and responses to inequity.
Travis Hills' Endeavors in Minnesota: Fostering Environmental and Economic Pr...Travis Hills MN
Travis Hills of Minnesota developed a method to convert waste into high-value dry fertilizer, significantly enriching soil quality. By providing farmers with a valuable resource derived from waste, Travis Hills helps enhance farm profitability while promoting environmental stewardship. Travis Hills' sustainable practices lead to cost savings and increased revenue for farmers by improving resource efficiency and reducing waste.
hematic appreciation test is a psychological assessment tool used to measure an individual's appreciation and understanding of specific themes or topics. This test helps to evaluate an individual's ability to connect different ideas and concepts within a given theme, as well as their overall comprehension and interpretation skills. The results of the test can provide valuable insights into an individual's cognitive abilities, creativity, and critical thinking skills
ESR spectroscopy in liquid food and beverages.pptxPRIYANKA PATEL
With increasing population, people need to rely on packaged food stuffs. Packaging of food materials requires the preservation of food. There are various methods for the treatment of food to preserve them and irradiation treatment of food is one of them. It is the most common and the most harmless method for the food preservation as it does not alter the necessary micronutrients of food materials. Although irradiated food doesn’t cause any harm to the human health but still the quality assessment of food is required to provide consumers with necessary information about the food. ESR spectroscopy is the most sophisticated way to investigate the quality of the food and the free radicals induced during the processing of the food. ESR spin trapping technique is useful for the detection of highly unstable radicals in the food. The antioxidant capability of liquid food and beverages in mainly performed by spin trapping technique.
EWOCS-I: The catalog of X-ray sources in Westerlund 1 from the Extended Weste...Sérgio Sacani
Context. With a mass exceeding several 104 M⊙ and a rich and dense population of massive stars, supermassive young star clusters
represent the most massive star-forming environment that is dominated by the feedback from massive stars and gravitational interactions
among stars.
Aims. In this paper we present the Extended Westerlund 1 and 2 Open Clusters Survey (EWOCS) project, which aims to investigate
the influence of the starburst environment on the formation of stars and planets, and on the evolution of both low and high mass stars.
The primary targets of this project are Westerlund 1 and 2, the closest supermassive star clusters to the Sun.
Methods. The project is based primarily on recent observations conducted with the Chandra and JWST observatories. Specifically,
the Chandra survey of Westerlund 1 consists of 36 new ACIS-I observations, nearly co-pointed, for a total exposure time of 1 Msec.
Additionally, we included 8 archival Chandra/ACIS-S observations. This paper presents the resulting catalog of X-ray sources within
and around Westerlund 1. Sources were detected by combining various existing methods, and photon extraction and source validation
were carried out using the ACIS-Extract software.
Results. The EWOCS X-ray catalog comprises 5963 validated sources out of the 9420 initially provided to ACIS-Extract, reaching a
photon flux threshold of approximately 2 × 10−8 photons cm−2
s
−1
. The X-ray sources exhibit a highly concentrated spatial distribution,
with 1075 sources located within the central 1 arcmin. We have successfully detected X-ray emissions from 126 out of the 166 known
massive stars of the cluster, and we have collected over 71 000 photons from the magnetar CXO J164710.20-455217.
When I was asked to give a companion lecture in support of ‘The Philosophy of Science’ (https://shorturl.at/4pUXz) I decided not to walk through the detail of the many methodologies in order of use. Instead, I chose to employ a long standing, and ongoing, scientific development as an exemplar. And so, I chose the ever evolving story of Thermodynamics as a scientific investigation at its best.
Conducted over a period of >200 years, Thermodynamics R&D, and application, benefitted from the highest levels of professionalism, collaboration, and technical thoroughness. New layers of application, methodology, and practice were made possible by the progressive advance of technology. In turn, this has seen measurement and modelling accuracy continually improved at a micro and macro level.
Perhaps most importantly, Thermodynamics rapidly became a primary tool in the advance of applied science/engineering/technology, spanning micro-tech, to aerospace and cosmology. I can think of no better a story to illustrate the breadth of scientific methodologies and applications at their best.
Describing and Interpreting an Immersive Learning Case with the Immersion Cub...Leonel Morgado
Current descriptions of immersive learning cases are often difficult or impossible to compare. This is due to a myriad of different options on what details to include, which aspects are relevant, and on the descriptive approaches employed. Also, these aspects often combine very specific details with more general guidelines or indicate intents and rationales without clarifying their implementation. In this paper we provide a method to describe immersive learning cases that is structured to enable comparisons, yet flexible enough to allow researchers and practitioners to decide which aspects to include. This method leverages a taxonomy that classifies educational aspects at three levels (uses, practices, and strategies) and then utilizes two frameworks, the Immersive Learning Brain and the Immersion Cube, to enable a structured description and interpretation of immersive learning cases. The method is then demonstrated on a published immersive learning case on training for wind turbine maintenance using virtual reality. Applying the method results in a structured artifact, the Immersive Learning Case Sheet, that tags the case with its proximal uses, practices, and strategies, and refines the free text case description to ensure that matching details are included. This contribution is thus a case description method in support of future comparative research of immersive learning cases. We then discuss how the resulting description and interpretation can be leveraged to change immersion learning cases, by enriching them (considering low-effort changes or additions) or innovating (exploring more challenging avenues of transformation). The method holds significant promise to support better-grounded research in immersive learning.
The technology uses reclaimed CO₂ as the dyeing medium in a closed loop process. When pressurized, CO₂ becomes supercritical (SC-CO₂). In this state CO₂ has a very high solvent power, allowing the dye to dissolve easily.
Authoring a personal GPT for your research and practice: How we created the Q...Leonel Morgado
Thematic analysis in qualitative research is a time-consuming and systematic task, typically done using teams. Team members must ground their activities on common understandings of the major concepts underlying the thematic analysis, and define criteria for its development. However, conceptual misunderstandings, equivocations, and lack of adherence to criteria are challenges to the quality and speed of this process. Given the distributed and uncertain nature of this process, we wondered if the tasks in thematic analysis could be supported by readily available artificial intelligence chatbots. Our early efforts point to potential benefits: not just saving time in the coding process but better adherence to criteria and grounding, by increasing triangulation between humans and artificial intelligence. This tutorial will provide a description and demonstration of the process we followed, as two academic researchers, to develop a custom ChatGPT to assist with qualitative coding in the thematic data analysis process of immersive learning accounts in a survey of the academic literature: QUAL-E Immersive Learning Thematic Analysis Helper. In the hands-on time, participants will try out QUAL-E and develop their ideas for their own qualitative coding ChatGPT. Participants that have the paid ChatGPT Plus subscription can create a draft of their assistants. The organizers will provide course materials and slide deck that participants will be able to utilize to continue development of their custom GPT. The paid subscription to ChatGPT Plus is not required to participate in this workshop, just for trying out personal GPTs during it.
Authoring a personal GPT for your research and practice: How we created the Q...
Workplace Social Self-Efficacy Journal of Career Assessment-2013-Fan-91-110.pdf
1. http://jca.sagepub.com/
Journal of Career Assessment
http://jca.sagepub.com/content/21/1/91
The online version of this article can be found at:
DOI: 10.1177/1069072712454702
2013 21: 91
Journal of Career Assessment
Songpol Kulviwat
Jinyan Fan, Robert C. Litchfield, Sayeed Islam, Brianne Weiner, Monique Alexander, Cong Liu and
Workplace Social Self-Efficacy: Concept, Measure, and Initial Validity Evidence
Published by:
http://www.sagepublications.com
can be found at:
Journal of Career Assessment
Additional services and information for
http://jca.sagepub.com/cgi/alerts
Email Alerts:
http://jca.sagepub.com/subscriptions
Subscriptions:
http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav
Reprints:
http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav
Permissions:
http://jca.sagepub.com/content/21/1/91.refs.html
Citations:
What is This?
- Aug 6, 2012
OnlineFirst Version of Record
at CITY UNIV OF HONG KONG on December 7, 2014
jca.sagepub.com
Downloaded from at CITY UNIV OF HONG KONG on December 7, 2014
jca.sagepub.com
Downloaded from
2. Article
Workplace Social
Self-Efficacy: Concept,
Measure, and Initial Validity
Evidence
Jinyan Fan1
, Robert C. Litchfield2
, Sayeed Islam3
,
Brianne Weiner3
, Monique Alexander3
,
Cong Liu3
, and Songpol Kulviwat4
Abstract
The authors proposed the construct of workplace social self-efficacy (WSSE) and developed an
inventory to measure it. Two empirical studies were conducted to examine the psychometric
properties of this new measure. In Study 1, we described the development of the WSSE inventory
and explored its factor structure in a sample of 304 full-time employees. Participants in Study 2 were
137 full-time employees (who provided self-report data) and 371 coworkers of these employees
(who submitted peer ratings). Results showed that the WSSE inventory had a four-factor structure
(social gathering, performance in public contexts, conflict management, and seeking and offering
help), high internal consistency, excellent convergent and discriminant validity, and meaningful
correlation patterns with related constructs in the nomological network. Furthermore, political skill
was found to mediate the relationship between WSSE and several outcome variables. In addition, the
WSSE inventory was found to have some advantages over the Perceived Social Self-Efficacy scale
(Smith & Betz, 2000), a general social self-efficacy measure. Theoretical and practical implications
were discussed.
Keywords
workplace social self-efficacy, scale development and validation, political skills, popularity
Success in most jobs has a social component. Employees may need to establish interpersonal rela-
tionships, present work to others, participate in social groups or gatherings, or seek or offer help in
1
Department of Psychology, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA
2
Department of Economics and Business, Washington and Jefferson College, Washington, PA, USA
3
Department of Psychology, Hofstra University, Hempstead, NY, USA
4
Department of Marketing and International Business, Frank G. Zarb School of Business, Hofstra University, Hempstead, NY,
USA
Corresponding Author:
Jinyan Fan, Department of Psychology, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA.
Email: jinyan.fan@auburn.edu
Journal of Career Assessment
21(1) 91-110
ª The Author(s) 2013
Reprints and permission:
sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav
DOI: 10.1177/1069072712454702
jca.sagepub.com
91
at CITY UNIV OF HONG KONG on December 7, 2014
jca.sagepub.com
Downloaded from
3. order to perform effectively. Given the central role of social relationship quality in determining
employees’ work experiences (e.g., Liden, Wayne, & Sparrowe, 2000; Liu, Nauta, Spector, & Li,
2008; Scott & Judge, 2009) and the ever-increasing social interaction demands in the workplace
(Ilgen & Pulakos, 1999), it is no surprise that social effectiveness constructs have proliferated (for
a review, see Ferris, Perrewé, & Douglas, 2002). What is missing from the literature, however, is an
empirical sense of how various social effectiveness constructs might overlap and how they might be
unique (Ferris et al., 2007).
In this article, we address aspects of the segmentation of the domain of social effectiveness at
work by developing a conceptual and empirical argument for the utility of workplace social self-
efficacy (WSSE), which we define as an employee’s confidence in his or her ability to engage in
job-related social interactional tasks and to develop and maintain effective interpersonal relation-
ships with other employees in his or her organization (cf. Smith & Betz, 2000). We use theory
related to self-efficacy (Bandura, 1986, 1997) to articulate a clear conceptualization of an important,
potentially malleable antecedent of social components of work performance. Our measure exhibits
appropriate convergent and discriminant validity with other interpersonal effectiveness measures
tied to work and nonwork domains. We contribute to research concerned with the social aspect
of work performance by providing evidence that this domain-specific measure of social
effectiveness complements other important measures (e.g., political skill, popularity) in ways that
may facilitate answers to questions that are of interest to vocational and organizational scholars.
Theory and Hypotheses
Self-efficacy is defined as ‘‘people’s judgments of their capabilities to organize and execute courses
of action required to attain designated types of performance’’ (Bandura, 1986, p. 391). Although
self-efficacy has been measured in many ways, ranging from a general trait (Chen, Gully, & Eden,
2001) to a highly situation-specific phenomenon (e.g., Bandura & Cervone, 1986), many researchers
interested in the employment sphere have measured self-efficacy at an intermediate level in order to
capture a relatively specific domain (e.g., job search, creativity) while maintaining some general use
properties of the measure. Included among these are test-taking self-efficacy (Truxillo, Bauer,
Campion, & Paronto, 2002), technology self-efficacy (Mathieu, Ahearne, & Taylor, 2007), job
search self-efficacy (Brown, Cober, Kane, Levy, & Shalhoop, 2006), and creative self-efficacy
(Tierney & Farmer, 2002). Various self-efficacy concepts and measures have greatly enhanced our
understanding of human behavior in organizational settings.
However, little is known about individuals’ self-efficacy perception within the social interaction
domain in the workplace. The vast majority of studies that have examined the construct of social
self-efficacy have focused on children or adolescents (e.g., Connolly, 1989; Wheeler & Ladd,
1982) rather than adults. Although there are a few adult social self-efficacy measures in the literature
(for a review, see Smith & Betz, 2000), none of them were designed specifically to measure WSSE.
This omission is unfortunate because, as noted above, self-efficacy is usually measured with at least
some degree of domain specificity. Furthermore, the workplace contains many social features (e.g.,
explicit hierarchy, reward systems, etc.) that are either not present or may be quite different from
other social milieus. Thus, attempts to examine more general measures of self-efficacy or those bor-
rowed from other domains may underrepresent or even misrepresent the role of self-efficacy in
social processes at work. At the same time, social effectiveness has been included in vocation-
specific measures such as teacher self-efficacy (e.g., Skaalvik & Skaalvik, 2007) and counselor
self-efficacy (e.g. Larson, 1998); however, their narrow focus on specific occupations limits their
utility for broader workplace use. Given the apparently widespread belief that social effectiveness
is important to performance in many jobs, a measure that is broad enough to cover a variety of jobs
but still tailored to work organizations has the potential to contribute to future research on
92 Journal of Career Assessment 21(1)
92
at CITY UNIV OF HONG KONG on December 7, 2014
jca.sagepub.com
Downloaded from
4. occupational success by relieving researchers of the need to construct and validate de novo measures
of social self-efficacy for every job or occupation studied while providing better domain specificity
than social measures that do not take into account work environments.
Social self-efficacy has been recognized as potentially important to the understanding of social
effectiveness at work. For instance, Ferris et al. (2007) include self-efficacy as a key antecedent
to aspects of their conceptualization of political skill. According to Ferris et al. social
self-efficacy captures the extent to which people feel a sense of capability to influence their social
environment through their actions, and this sense of capability may be a critical determinant of some
aspects of political skill. However, social self-efficacy has received essentially no research attention
from organizational scientists (Ferris et al., 2002). Our view is that the understanding of self-effi-
cacy’s role in workplace social relationships might be facilitated through a better targeting of
self-efficacy to the workplace social domain.
Prior Adult Social Self-Efficacy Measures
Although we target the work domain specifically, it is important to note that there are several mea-
sures of overall social self-efficacy of adults available in the literature; however, most of them tend
to be either psychometrically problematic or conceptually too narrow (Smith & Betz, 2000). For
instance, items of the social self-efficacy subscale of Sherer et al.’s (1982) Generalized Self-
Efficacy scale were derived post hoc, based on exploratory factor analysis, rather than a priori.
Researchers have consistently reported less than optimal coefficient as for this measure (around
.70). Fichten, Bourdon, Amsel, and Fox’s (1987) Interaction Self-Efficacy Questionnaire focuses
on college students’ interactions with the same sex. The social skills subscale of the Skills
Confidence Inventory (Betz, Harmon, & Borgen, 1996) is limited to vocational activities and school
subjects. Fan and Mak’s (1998) Social Self-Efficacy scale for Students is intended for intercultural
social contexts. Thus, these measures are apparently inappropriate for general workplace use.
Perhaps, the best adult social self-efficacy measure for general use to date is the 25-item ‘‘Per-
ceived Social Self-Efficacy (PSSE)’’ scale (Smith & Betz, 2000). Smith and Betz (2000) define
social self-efficacy as ‘‘an individual’s confidence in his or her ability to engage in the social inter-
actional tasks necessary to initiate and maintain interpersonal relationships’’ (p. 286). PSSE items
cover social tasks relating to making friends, social assertiveness, pursuing romantic relationships,
performance in public situations, groups or parties, and receiving and giving help. According to sev-
eral empirical studies (e.g., Lin & Betz, 2009; Smith & Betz, 2000; Xie, 2007), scores from the PSSE
scale have demonstrated excellent psychometric properties. For instance, the a coefficients were in
the .90s, and the 3-week test–retest coefficients were in the low .80s. Smith and Betz (2000) reported
that the PSSE scale had a single-factor structure and was strongly correlated with several alternative
social self-efficacy measures. Furthermore, PSSE scores were consistently found to be negatively
correlated with scores in shyness, social anxiety, and depression, but positively correlated with
scores in personal self-esteem.
Despite the excellent psychometric properties of the PSSE scale, it lacks ideal properties to mea-
sure WSSE. First, PSSE items focus on behaviors in general, not workplace, social contexts. Such a
difference in level of specificity might have important consequences. For instance, there has been
emerging evidence for the frame-of-reference effect which suggests that work-specific personality
measures are more powerful predictors of work-related criteria than general personality measures
(e.g., Bing, Whanger, Davison, & VanHook, 2004; Wang, Bowling, & Eschleman, 2010). Second,
the ‘‘pursuing romantic relationships’’ domain might not be appropriate in organizational settings.
Third, items in the PSSE scale exclusively focus on nonconflict social situations, but conflict situa-
tions are a potentially important element of the workplace social domain (e.g., De Dreu & Weingart,
2003). A conflict situation is one in which an individual’s feelings, beliefs, or desired outcomes are
Fan et al. 93
93
at CITY UNIV OF HONG KONG on December 7, 2014
jca.sagepub.com
Downloaded from
5. not aligned with someone else’s feelings, beliefs, or desired outcomes; whereas a nonconflict situ-
ation does not contain any form of contradiction of goals between two or more people (Wheeler &
Ladd, 1982). Together, these aspects of extant social self-efficacy measures suggest that none is
especially well suited to the workplace. Given our discussion of the need for a measure targeted
to the social domain of the workplace and the state of existing measures, we conclude that a new
measure is needed.
Scope and Nomological Network of WSSE
Despite its focus on the domain of work, WSSE is perhaps broader in scope than several more
discrete, socially related self-efficacy concepts such as leadership self-efficacy (Ng, Ang, & Chan,
2008), team collective efficacy (Tasa, Taggar, & Seijts, 2007), and participation self-efficacy (Lam,
Chen, & Schaubroeck, 2002). Consistent with our definition, we envision the WSSE construct as
potentially applicable to many workplace social relations that may or may not take place within
or between teams, or across hierarchies or other structural boundaries. WSSE is shaped by the pos-
itive emphasis on perceived capability inherent in self-efficacy constructs. In this vein, we expect
that WSSE will display positive relationships with many other social effectiveness constructs. One
reason for such relationships may be conceptual overlap between constructs in the workplace social
domain (Ferris et al., 2002), but Ferris et al. (2007) have also suggested that self-efficacy may be
considered an antecedent of political skill.
We use Smith and Betz’s (2000) PSSE scale and Ferris et al.’s (2005) Political Skill Inventory
(PSI) to examine the convergent validity of the WSSE inventory. While PSSE is a general social
self-efficacy construct, political skill is a workplace-specific social effectiveness construct, defined
as ‘‘the ability to effectively understand others at work, and to use such knowledge to influence oth-
ers to act in ways that enhance one’s personal and/or organizational objectives’’ (Ferris et al., 2005,
p. 127). We hypothesize that WSSE scores should have positive and strong correlations with PSSE
scores and PSI scores (Hypothesis 1a). We use the using technology subscale from Betz et al.’s
(2003) Expanded Skill Confidence Inventory (ESCI), an apparently nonsocial domain self-
efficacy measure, to assess the general discriminant validity of the WSSE inventory. Compared
to the correlation between WSSE scores and PSSE scores and the correlation between WSSE scores
and PSI scores, we hypothesize a much weaker correlation between WSSE scores and ESCI scores
(Hypothesis 1b).
We use Pierce, Gardner, Cummings, and Dunham’s (1989) measure of organization-based self-
esteem as a second, organizationally relevant source of convergent validity evidence. Organization
based self-esteem (OBSE) is defined as ‘‘the degree to which an individual believes himself or her-
self to be capable, significant, and worthy as an organizational member’’ (Pierce & Gardner, 2004,
p. 593). An employee with a high level of WSSE is more likely to effectively complete the social
aspects of the job and develop and maintain good interpersonal relationships with his or her
coworkers than his or her low WSSE counterparts, and in turn to have a strong sense of ‘‘I count
here,’’ that is, a higher level of OBSE. Further, Judge, Locke, and Durham (1997) found that, at the
trait level, self-efficacy and self-esteem are related ‘‘core’’ self-evaluations. Thus, we hypothesize a
positive correlation between WSSE scores and OBSE scores (Hypothesis 2).
We also expect WSSE to function somewhat differently from other social effectiveness
constructs. Ferris et al. (2002) noted that many social effectiveness constructs, such as emotional
intelligence, self-monitoring, and political skill, entail two major components: (a) the ability to
accurately understand (or read) various social situations and (b) the capability to act on that
understanding by carrying out appropriate behavioral strategies. However, WSSE does not fit this
framework; instead, it simply focuses on the perceived ability in completing a variety of specific
social tasks required at work. Indeed, other research on domain self-efficacy suggests that
94 Journal of Career Assessment 21(1)
94
at CITY UNIV OF HONG KONG on December 7, 2014
jca.sagepub.com
Downloaded from
6. individuals are more likely to direct resources toward goals for which they feel high self-efficacy,
but that the magnitude of the resources people allocate is lower when they feel high self-efficacy
(Vancouver, More, & Yoder, 2008). Thus, self-efficacy may come with a situational blindness that
is consistent with an ability perception but inconsistent with a careful analysis of task context (cf.
Ferris et al., 2002).
In the workplace social domain, this suggests that an important difference between WSSE and
many other constructs dealing with workplace social effectiveness may be that WSSE does not
include in the construct concepts of social perception, comparison, or judgment that are involved
in analyzing social situations. Such a difference might have important consequences. For instance,
social effectiveness constructs adhering to Ferris et al.’s (2002) framework should display relation-
ships with impression management (IM) and conflict avoidance, though different constructs might
display these relationships due to different mechanisms (cf. the role of emotions in emotional
intelligence, Salovey & Meyer, 1990; the connotation of self-serving and controlling of others in
political skill, Ferris et al., 2007). In contrast, the WSSE construct, which does not include explicit
analysis of social situations, should not be strongly associated with IM or conflict avoidance.
Therefore, we hypothesize that compared to political skill (a construct that does follow Ferris et al.’s
framework), WSSE scores should have weaker correlations with IM scores (Hypothesis 3a) and
workplace interpersonal conflict scores (Hypothesis 3b).
We consider two more distal sets of WSSE-related criteria. The first set includes two strain vari-
ables: physical symptoms and job-related affective well-being. The occupational health psychology
literature has convincingly established that one major source of stress at work is interpersonal in
nature (e.g., Spector & Jex, 1998). If, as argued earlier, employees with a high level of WSSE are
expected to have effective interpersonal relationships with others at work, and thus tend to experi-
ence less interpersonal stress, they will also have less strain, indicated by less physical symptoms
and more positive emotional reactions at work. Such outcomes are consistent with characterizations
of self-efficacy as a key concept in the regulation of motivation, cognition, and affect (Bandura,
1986, 1997). Thus, we hypothesize that WSSE scores will have a negative correlation with physical
symptoms scores (Hypothesis 4a) and a positive correlation with job-related affective well-being
scores (Hypothesis 4b).
The second set of distal criteria we consider are three coworker-rated variables: (a) popularity,
defined as ‘‘being generally accepted by one’s peers’’ (Scott & Judge, 2009, p. 21), (b) interpersonal
counterproductive work behaviors (CWB-I) targeted (Porath, Pearson, & Shapiro, 1999), and (c)
interpersonal organizational citizenship behaviors (OCB-I) targeted (Lee & Allan, 2002). Because
employees with a high level of WSSE are apt to develop and maintain good relationships with others
in the organization, they are likely to be liked and accepted by their coworkers, and their coworkers
are less likely to mistreat them and more likely to help them at work. This argument is arguably not
directly predicted by self-efficacy theory per se but, assuming that the behaviors directed by
self-efficacy do have some effect on the environment, it is expected to logically follow from self-
efficacy theory. Reciprocal effects of positive social behaviors inspired by high WSSE are also in
line with Blau’s (1964) social exchange theory. Thus, we hypothesize that WSSE scores should have
a positive correlation with peer-rated popularity scores (Hypothesis 5a), a negative correlation with
CWB-I targeted scores (Hypothesis 5b), and a positive correlation with OCB-I targeted scores
(Hypothesis 5c).
Ferris et al. (2007) conceptualize social self-efficacy as an antecedent of political skill; however,
no empirical study has investigated this relationship. Expanding on this point, we test whether
political skill mediates the relationship between WSSE and aforementioned outcome variables.
We have argued earlier that WSSE should be related to these outcome variables, and similar rela-
tionships can be expected between political skill and the same outcome variables (for a review of
political skill, see Ferris et al., 2007). Even when we expect a weaker relationship between WSSE
Fan et al. 95
95
at CITY UNIV OF HONG KONG on December 7, 2014
jca.sagepub.com
Downloaded from
7. and an outcome variable relative to political skill (i.e., for interpersonal conflict), such a prediction
does not eliminate the possibility of an indirect effect through political skill (Hayes, 2009).
Therefore, we hypothesize that political skill should mediate the relationship between WSSE and
workplace interpersonal conflict (Hypothesis 6a), physical symptoms (Hypothesis 6b), affective
job-related well-being (Hypothesis 6c), coworker-rated popularity (Hypothesis 6d), coworker-
rated CWB-I targeted (Hypothesis 6e), and coworker-rated OCB-I targeted (Hypothesis 6f).
Finally, we investigate how much of an advantage, if any, does the WSSE inventory have as a
domain-specific, WSSE measure over the PSSE scale, a general social self-efficacy measure? Based
on the notion of frame-of-reference effect mentioned earlier (e.g., Bing et al., 2004; Wang et al., 2010),
we expect that WSSE scores should be more strongly associated with various organizational variables
than should PSSE scores. In particular, we hypothesize that WSSE scores should exhibit unique rela-
tionships with organizational variables after PSSE scores are controlled for (Hypothesis 7).
In the following, we present two empirical studies validating the WSSE inventory. Study 1
described the development of the WSSE inventory and explored the factor structure of this new mea-
sure. Study 2 confirmed WSSE’s factor structure in an independent sample and tested the proposed
research hypotheses.
Study 1
Development of the Work Social Self-Efficacy (WSSE) Inventory
We first specified the behavioral domains of WSSE, as per Bandura’s (2005) guidelines. Following
Smith and Betz’s (2000) work on the PSSE scale, we designated five similar domains for WSSE:
social assertiveness, establishing interpersonal relationships, performance in public contexts, partic-
ipation in social groups or gatherings, and seeking and offering help, all in the workplace. We
excluded the domain of ‘‘pursuing romantic relationships’’ because it deviates from our interest
in effective professional relationships. We considered both conflict and nonconflict social situations
in each of the five domains. In other words, we attempted to sample workplace social behaviors from
two crossed dimensions: (a) content domains and (b) type of social scenarios. Also note that the
above five domains differ in the extent to which items describe job-related social tasks versus inter-
personal relationship maintenance tasks. For instance, almost all social tasks in the performance in
public contexts domain are job-related, whereas many social tasks in the participation in social
groups or gatherings domain are related to interpersonal relationship maintenance at work.
We interviewed 15 full-time employees from various types of organizations. These employees
held both high and low status positions in their respective organizations and had been working in
their jobs for at least 3 years. During these interviews, we asked them to list social tasks they had
performed in order to fulfill their job duties and/or develop and maintain effective interpersonal rela-
tionships with others at work. These interviews yielded 265 initial items.
Next, we conducted several rounds of intensive discussions within the research team, which
consisted of three faculty members and three graduate students in Industrial and Organizational
psychology, to screen these initial items. In the first round of discussion, we aimed to screen out
items that did not meet our inclusion criteria, that is, a good item must be (a) clearly worded and
easy to understand, (b) relevant to our definition of WSSE, (c) applicable to the workplace, and
(d) commonly found in many jobs. During the discussion, we also attempted to modify items that
met criteria (b), (c), and (d), but not (a), in order to make them useful. The decision to accept or reject
an item was based on a majority vote among the research team. At the end of the first round of
discussion, 75 items remained. In the second round of discussion, we attempted to categorize the
75 items into predesignated five subdomains, as well as into conflict versus nonconflict social situa-
tions. We also assessed items for repetition of concepts and proper placement of items into various
96 Journal of Career Assessment 21(1)
96
at CITY UNIV OF HONG KONG on December 7, 2014
jca.sagepub.com
Downloaded from
8. categories. Items that were difficult to categorize or repetitive were removed. We note that difficult-
to-categorize items did not seem to form any meaningful theme. Item exclusions were based on
group consensus. At the conclusion of this round of discussion, 58 items survived.
We then asked 31 subject matter experts (industrial and organizational graduate students) to rate
each of the 58 items based on three criteria: (a) whether the item is worded clearly, (b) whether the
specific social task is relevant to the definition of WSSE, and (c) whether the social situation in the
item is commonly experienced in many jobs/organizations. After analyzing the data, we conducted
another round of discussions to further evaluate items with the lowest ratings. Items were eliminated
if all members in the research team agreed that they did not match the established criteria. In addi-
tion, we continued to reevaluate the clarity and categorization of each item throughout the process.
These efforts resulted in 37 semifinalized WSSE items to be empirically examined in the initial vali-
dation study. The WSSE inventory asks participants to rate their confidence level in carrying out
these 37 workplace social tasks on a 100-point scale (0 ¼ no confidence; 50 ¼ moderate confidence;
100 ¼ complete confidence). This 100-point scale was recommended by Bandura (2005) for
self-efficacy scales.
Sample and Procedure
We asked undergraduate students enrolled in one of the three international marketing classes at a
private Northeastern U.S. university in the spring semester of 2009 to help with data collection,
in exchange for a modest amount of extra credit. Specifically, each student was given several sets
of questionnaires, which contained the 37 semifinalized WSSE items and a demographic survey, and
was asked to locate full-time employees and then have them complete the questionnaire. We
collected contact information from participants to verify that full-time employees (not students)
completed the self-report survey. The first page of the surveys, which contained participants’ contact
information, was removed after verification. We verified one randomly selected survey returned by
each student. If a survey failed the verification, all other surveys contributed by the student were
ruled invalid and then discarded.
Students returned 304 completed and verified questionnaires; on average, each student returned 4
completed questionnaires. Among these 304 full-time employees, 51% were female, 47% were
male, and 2% did not report their gender information. The average age was 35 years, 52% had at
least a bachelor’s degree, the average position tenure was 94 months, and the average weekly
working hours was 43 hr. Collectively, these employees worked in 15 different industries, and the
organizational levels of their positions were very diverse, ranging from entry-level positions to chief
executive officers. Forty-four percent of these employees reported engaging in some sort of social
interaction at work at least a couple of times every half day, and 39% reported that their jobs require
some sort of social interaction at least a couple of times every half day.
Factor Structure and Internal Consistency of the WSSE Inventory
The 37 37 item correlation matrix was subjected to exploratory factor analyses using the Compre-
hensive Exploratory Factor Analysis (Browne, Cudeck, Tateneni, Mels, 2004). In determining
number of factors to retain, we considered multiple criteria, following the suggestion by Fabrigar,
Wegener, MacCallum, and Strahan (1999). The eigenvalue 1 rule, scree plot, and parallel analysis
suggested retaining three or four factors. We then compared the interpretability of obliquely rotated
factor loading matrix of these two alternative models. In doing so, we removed items that did not
load substantially on any of the factors and items that had high cross-loadings, and we only consid-
ered loadings with the minimum magnitude of .50. The above exclusion criteria yielded 22 surviving
WSSE items.
Fan et al. 97
97
at CITY UNIV OF HONG KONG on December 7, 2014
jca.sagepub.com
Downloaded from
9. Comparisons of factor loading pattern of the three-factor model and the four-factor model led to
several observations. First, two factors clearly emerged in both models with exactly identical items.
The 6 items loaded highly on the first factor included social tasks related to participating in social
groups and gatherings, and thus were named the Social Gathering factor, with an estimated a coef-
ficient of .90. The 6 items loaded highly on the second factor included social tasks related to perfor-
mance in public contexts, and thus were named the Public Performance factor, with an estimated a
coefficient of .92. The second observation was that the third factor in the three-factor model defied a
clear interpretation as items did not seem to belong to a single major theme. This factor was split into
two separate factors in the four-factor model, with each having a much clearer interpretation. Spe-
cifically, the 5 items that loaded substantially on the third factor included social tasks related to seek-
ing and offering help, and thus were named the Seeking and Offering Help factor, with an estimated
a coefficient of .83. The 5 items that loaded highly on the fourth factor were in the domain of social
assertiveness, but also related to dealing with social scenarios involving potential conflict. The fac-
tor thus was named the Conflict Management factor, with an estimated a coefficient of .81.
Based on these results, we chose the four-factor model over the three-factor model to represent
the tentative factor structure of the WSSE inventory. It is interesting to note that (a) three of the four
factors were completely consistent with our a priori designation of WSSE domains, (b) one prede-
signated domain, establishing interpersonal relationships, failed to emerge in factor analysis, and (c)
items from social assertive domain that dealt with social scenarios involving potential conflict
formed the Conflict Management factor.
Next, we conducted a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) on these 22 WSSE items, imposing the
above identified factor structure using LISREL 8 (Jöreskog Sörbom, 1996). The CFA yielded
acceptable model fit: w2
(df ¼ 203) ¼ 778.02, p .01, Non-Normed Fit Index (NNFI) ¼ .95, Com-
parative Fit Index (CFI) ¼ .96, standardized root mean square residual (SRMR) ¼ .07. Table 1 pre-
sents standardized factor loadings for WSSE dimensions. As can be seen, all factor loadings were
significant, with an averaged loading of .75. Thus, we have established a tentative factor structure
of the WSSE inventory, which was to be confirmed in an independent sample in Study 2. The a coef-
ficient for the WSSE total inventory was estimated to be .93. Thus, the WSSE inventory and its four
subscales had excellent internal consistency.
We also explored the relationship between WSSE and several demographic variables. Results
indicated that WSSE total scores (a) had significant, yet modest correlations with position tenure
(r ¼ .11, p .05), weekly working hours (r ¼ .15, p .01), and age (r ¼ .14, p .05) and (b) had
nonsignificant correlations with gender and education (ps .05). It is possible that position tenure
and weekly working hours represent opportunities to interact with an individual’s colleagues, the
more of which contribute to the enhancement of social self-efficacy.
Study 2
Method
Sample and procedure. We asked graduate students enrolled in a work motivation class and under-
graduate students enrolled in one of two international business classes at a private Northeastern U.S.
university in the fall semester of 2009 to help with data collection. Specifically, students were to
identify two or three full-time employees they know and then give them the survey packages.
Full-time employees were instructed by students to complete a self-report questionnaire, and then
to distribute the peer-rating surveys to up to five coworkers, who were to independently complete
the peer-rating survey. Both self-report questionnaire and peer-rating surveys were enclosed sepa-
rately in self-addressed, postage-paid return envelopes so that they may be mailed directly back
to the researchers.
98 Journal of Career Assessment 21(1)
98
at CITY UNIV OF HONG KONG on December 7, 2014
jca.sagepub.com
Downloaded from
10. Table 1. Standardized Factor Loadings of the WSSE Inventory Based on the Confirmatory Factor Analyses in
Studies 1 and 2.
Items—–How confident are you in. . . SG PP CM HP
1. Inviting your coworkers to an office birthday party for
your coworkers?
.78 (.85)
2. Participating in a holiday gift exchange with your
coworkers?
.79 (.78)
3. Taking part in group lunches or dinners with your
coworkers?
.89 (.89)
4. Engaging in small talks with your coworkers prior to a
staff meeting?
.75 (.81)
5. Participating in a game night with your coworkers? .72 (.71)
6. Socializing with your supervisors at a company function? .70 (.73)
7. Presenting to a group of potential clients? .82 (.89)
8. Presenting the results of your current work project to
your colleagues at a staff meeting?
.82 (.91)
9. Expressing your opinions at a staff meeting? .83 (.82)
10. Facilitating a group discussion in your work unit? .82 (.85)
11. Making a presentation on behalf of your company to a
large audience at a professional conference?
.75 (.85)
12. Presenting a work project at a management meeting
where your supervisor and other managers attend?
.84 (.92)
13. Approaching your supervisor regarding your unfair
performance appraisal without creating tension with him
or her?
.71 (.76)
14. Your supervisor asks you to work overtime on a day
when you have a prior engagement. How confident are
you in refusing this request without creating a bad
impression?
.65 (.70)
15. Asking your supervisor for feedback regarding your
performance on a recently completed project?
.68 (.69)
16. A colleague asks for your help on a project, and you do
not have the time. How confident are you in saying no
without damaging your relationship with him or her?
.70 (.70)
17. Giving negative performance feedback to a coworker
without frustrating him or her off?
.68 (.62)
18. You notice your coworker is frustrated with his or her
current work project. How confident are you in taking
him or her out for lunch to give him or her support?
.54 (.63)
19. Asking coworkers to help you on a work project? .78 (.80)
20. Seeking help from your supervisor when you are having
difficulty completing a job task?
.68 (.75)
21. Asking for help from a coworker when you have a
fast-approaching deadline at work?
.82 (.84)
22. Offering help to a coworker who appears overwhelmed
by a project he or she is currently working on?
.75 (.79)
Note. CM ¼ conflict management; HP ¼ seeking and offering help; PP ¼ performance in public contexts; SG ¼ social gather-
ing; WSSE ¼ workplace social self-efficacy.
Factor loadings before parentheses were based on the Study 1 sample; factor loadings within parentheses were based on the
Study 2 sample.
Fan et al. 99
99
at CITY UNIV OF HONG KONG on December 7, 2014
jca.sagepub.com
Downloaded from
11. We collected contact information from participants to verify (a) that full-time employees (not stu-
dents) completed the self-report survey and (b) that coworkers of full-time employees (not students
or full-time employees) completed the peer-report survey. The first page of the surveys, which con-
tained participants’ contact information, was removed after verification. Participants were made
aware of this step; therefore, data should be considered anonymous, and self-report and peer-
rating surveys were linked through a preassigned survey series number. We verified all employee
self-report surveys and those surveys that failed the verification were discarded. We also verified
one randomly selected coworker rating survey. If a peer-rating survey failed the verification, all
other peer-rating surveys on the same focal participants were ruled invalid and then discarded.
In exchange for students’ data collection effort, they received extra credit in their respective
classes. It should be noted, however, full-time employees and their coworkers were not provided any
incentives for completing the survey packages. This method of data collection has been used by
other organizational researchers (e.g., Harris, Harris, Brouer, 2009; Liu, Perrewé, Hochwarter,
Kacmar, 2004).
Of the 223 sets of survey packages we distributed, 137 verified self-report surveys and 371 ver-
ified peer-rating surveys were returned. Among employees who provided self-report data, 46% were
male, 72% had at least a bachelor’s degree, with a mean age of 42 years, a mean of 43 weekly work-
ing hours, and average position tenure of 88 months. Respondents represented a wide variety of
industries (e.g., finance, information technology, mechanical engineering, education, food bever-
age, health care, and government). Approximately, 71% of employees received multiple peer rat-
ings. On average, each employee received 2.71 peer ratings.
Measures
WSSE. The 22-item WSSE inventory was used.
Social self-efficacy. The 25-item PSSE scale (Smith Betz, 2000) measured general social self-
efficacy. Items were rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (no confidence at all) to
5 (complete confidence). One sample item is ‘‘How confident are you in asking someone for help
when you need it.’’ The a coefficient was .95 in the current sample.
Using technology skills confidence. The 10-item using technology subscale from Betz et al.’s (2003)
ESCI was used. Items were rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (no confidence at all)
to 5 (complete confidence). One sample item is ‘‘Use a personal finance software program.’’ The a
coefficient was .93 in the current sample.
IM. Participants’ tendency to engage socially desirable responding was measured by the IM scale
from the Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding (Paulhus, 1988). The IM scale has been
widely used in research examining social desirability in noncognitive measures. We used the 12-
item short version of the IM scale provided by Delroy Paulhus (personal communication, October
27, 2009). One sample item is ‘‘I don’t gossip about other people’s business.’’ The a coefficient was
.74 in the current sample.
Political skill. Ferris et al.’s (2005) 18-item PSI was used. PSI has demonstrated excellent psycho-
metric properties (e.g., Andrews, Kacmar, Harris, 2009; Liu et al., 2007; also see Ferris et al.,
2007, for a review). Items were rated on 5-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree)
to 5 (strongly agree). Sample items include ‘‘I spend a lot of time and effort at work networking with
others’’ and ‘‘I understand people very well.’’ The a coefficient was .92 for PSI scale.
100 Journal of Career Assessment 21(1)
100
at CITY UNIV OF HONG KONG on December 7, 2014
jca.sagepub.com
Downloaded from
12. Organization based self-esteem. The 10-item OBSE scale by Pierce et al. (1989) was used. Items
were rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree).
One sample item is ‘‘I am a valuable part of this place.’’ The a coefficient was .90 in the current
sample.
Workplace interpersonal conflict. The 4-item Interpersonal Conflict at Work scale (Spector Jex,
1998) was used. Participants were asked to indicate how often they get into arguments with others at
work, how often other people yell at them at work, how often people are rude to them at work, and
how often other people do nasty things to them at work. Items were rated on a 5-point scale ranging
from 1 (less than once per month or never) to 5 (several times per day). Spector and Jex (1998)
reported an averaged a coefficient of .74 across 13 studies. The a coefficient was .74 in the current
sample.
Job-related affective well-being. We used the 20-item short form of the Job-Related Affective Well-
being scale (Van Katwyk, Fox, Spector, Kelloway, 2000) to measure participants’ emotional reac-
tions to their job. Participants were asked to indicate how often they had experienced 20 emotions at
work over the last 30 days. Each item was an emotion and was rated on a 5-point scale ranging from
1 (never) to 5 (always). The a coefficient was .90 in the current sample.
Physical symptoms. The 18-item Physical Symptoms Inventory (Spector Jex, 1998) assessed par-
ticipants’ physical, somatic health symptoms. Participants were asked to indicate for each of the 18
symptoms if they did not have it, had it, or saw a doctor for it in the past 30 days. The total physical
symptom score was calculated as the summation of the number of symptoms they had. This total
score was used in subsequent analyses. Because this is a count variable, the a coefficient is not
applicable.
Popularity. The 8-item Popularity scale by Scott and Judge (2009) was used. Coworkers rated the
focal employees’ popularity within their work unit. Items were based on a 5-point Likert-type scale
ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). A sample item is ‘‘The person for whom I
am completing this survey is popular.’’ The a coefficient was .92 in the current sample.
Interpersonal counterproductive work behavior (CWB-I) targeted. We adapted the 9-item CWB-I scale
by Porath, Pearson, and Shapiro (1999) to measure CWB-I targeted. Items were rated by coworkers
of the focal employees on a 5-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (almost never) to 5 (very often).
One sample item is ‘‘How often do this person’s coworkers insult him/her?’’ The a coefficient was
.88 in the current sample.
Interpersonal organizational citizenship behavior (OCB-I) targeted. We adapted the 8-item OCB-I scale
by Lee and Allan (2002) to measure OCB-I targeted. Items were rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale
ranging from 1 (almost never) to 5 (very often). One sample item is ‘‘How often do this person’s
coworkers give up time to help him or her with work or non-work problems?’’ The a coefficient was
.92 in the current sample.
Results
Factor Structure of the WSSE Inventory
We conducted a CFA on the 22 WSSE items, imposing the factor structure identified in Study 1. The
CFA yielded acceptable model fit: w2
¼ 496.95, p .01, NNFI ¼ .94, CFI ¼ .94, SRMR ¼ .07. Table
Fan et al. 101
101
at CITY UNIV OF HONG KONG on December 7, 2014
jca.sagepub.com
Downloaded from
13. 1 presents standardized factor loadings for the WSSE inventory. As can be seen, all factor loadings
were significant, with an averaged loading of .79. The a coefficient for the WSSE total scale was
estimated to be .93, and the coefficient for the four WSSE subscales was estimated to be .90 for the
social gathering subscale, .94 for the public performance subscale, .81 for the conflict management
subscale, and .87 for the seeking and offering help subscale. Thus, we conclude that WSSE inven-
tory’s factor structure was established and the WSSE inventory and its subscales had excellent inter-
nal consistency.
Convergent and Discriminant Validity
Table 2 presents the means, standard deviations, and correlations among study variables. WSSE
scores had strong and positive correlations with PSSE scores (r ¼ .67, p .01), PSI scores (r ¼
.55, p .01), and OBSE scores (r ¼ .53, p .01), but had a positive, yet much weaker correlation
with Using Technology Skills Confidence scores (r ¼ .22, p .01). Three t tests for the difference
between two dependent correlation coefficients yielded significant results: for r ¼ .67 (PSSE) versus
r ¼ .22 (Using Technology), t (134) ¼ 5.77, p .01; for r ¼ .55 (PSI) versus r ¼ .22 (Using Tech-
nology), t (134) ¼ 3.38, p .01, and for r ¼ .53 (OBSE) versus r ¼ .22 (Using Technology), t (134)
¼ 3.14, p .01. Thus, Hypotheses 1a, 1b, and 2 were supported.
Nomological Network Analysis
Hypothesis 3a predicted that the correlation between WSSE scores and IM scores should be weaker
than the correlation between political skills scores and IM scores. As expected based on the theore-
tical proposition that WSSE may involve a degree of situational blindness, WSSE total scores were
uncorrelated with IM scores (for WSSE total: r ¼ .01, p ¼ .98); however, PSI scores were positively
correlated with IM scores (r ¼ .20, p .05). A test for the difference between these two dependent
correlation coefficients was significant: t (134) ¼ 2.38, p .05, thus supporting Hypothesis 3a.
Hypothesis 3b predicted that WSSE scores should have a weaker correlation with workplace
interpersonal conflict scores than should PSI scores. Table 2 indicated that WSSE scores were not
significantly correlated with interpersonal conflict scores (r ¼ .13, p ¼ .12), whereas PSI scores
were (r ¼ .25, p .01). A test for the difference between two dependent correlation coefficients
indicated that although the correlation difference pattern was in the expected direction, it failed to
reach the conventional significance: r ¼ .13 versus r ¼ .25, t(134) ¼ 1.51, p ¼ .06. Together,
these results suggest weak support for Hypothesis 3b.
According to Table 2, WSSE scores had a significant and negative correlation with the Physical
Symptom scores (r ¼ .18, p .05), and a significant and positive correlation with Job-related
Affective Well-being scores (r ¼ .35, p .01). Thus, Hypotheses 4a and 4b were supported.
In calculating correlations between WSSE scores and three coworker ratings, we only considered
participants who received at least two coworker ratings (n ¼ 97), in order to provide more rigorous
tests of the relevant hypotheses. Among the coworker ratings, popularity is a consensus-based con-
cept (Scott Judge, 2009), and we thus calculated the interrater agreement, rwg for coworker-rated
popularity (James, Demarre, Wolf, 1984). It turned out that rwg value was larger than the conven-
tional cutoff of .70 for all 97 participants, which justified using averaged coworker-rated popularity
in subsequent analyses. The other two coworker ratings were not consensus-based constructs, and
we simply calculated the average ratings.
WSSE scores were found to be significantly correlated with the coworker-rated popularity scores
(r ¼ .27,n¼ 97, p .01)and coworker-ratedOCB-I targetedscores(r ¼ .23,n ¼ 97, p .05), supporting
Hypotheses 5a and 5c, respectively. However, Hypothesis 5b was not supported, as the correlation
between WSSE scores and CWB-I targeted scores was not significant: r ¼ .01, n ¼ 97, p .05.
102 Journal of Career Assessment 21(1)
102
at CITY UNIV OF HONG KONG on December 7, 2014
jca.sagepub.com
Downloaded from
15. Hypothesis 6 predicted that political skill should mediate the relationship between WSSE and
various outcome variables. The key to a mediation relationship is the significance of the indirect
effect (Hayes, 2009). Methodologists have recently recommended using the bootstrapping method
to test the indirect effect to overcome the seldom-held normality assumption required by the Sobel
test (e.g., Preacher Hayes, 2008). Thus, we used the bootstrapping method to test these mediation
effects, using the statistical package for social sciences macro written by Preacher and Hayes. The
results are summarized in Table 3. Specifically, political skill was found to mediate the relationship
between WSSE and workplace interpersonal conflict (the indirect effect ¼ .0055, p .05, support-
ing Hypothesis 6a), affective well-being (the indirect effect ¼ .0048, p .05, supporting Hypoth-
esis 6c), and coworker-rated popularity (the indirect effect ¼ .0070, p .05, supporting Hypothesis
6f). Other mediation hypotheses were not supported.
Hypothesis 7 predicted that WSSE scores should exhibit unique relationships with organizational
variables after PSSE scores are controlled for. We conducted a series of hierarchical regression anal-
yses in which PSSE was entered into the regression model in Step 1 and then in Step 2 WSSE was
also entered. Note that workplace interpersonal conflict and coworker-rated CWB-I targeted were
not included in this set of analysis because they were not significantly correlated with either WSSE
or PSSE. Also note that we intentionally included the nonorganizational variable of physical symp-
toms to examine whether the advantage of WSSE scores over PSSE scores is limited to the organi-
zational settings. The regression results are summarized in Table 4. WSSE scores yielded unique,
significant relationships with all organizational variables after controlling for PSSE scores, includ-
ing organizational based self-esteem (b ¼ .50, DR2
¼ .14), political skill (b ¼ .29, DR2
¼ .04), job-
related affective well-being (b ¼ .23, DR2
¼ .03), coworker-rated popularity (b ¼ .31, DR2
¼ .08),
and coworker-rated OCB-I targeted (b ¼ .41, DR2
¼ .09). Interestingly, WSSE scores did not yield
unique relationships with the nonorganizational variable of physical symptoms (b ¼ .08, DR2
¼
.00) after PSSE scores were controlled for. Therefore, taken together, Hypothesis 7 was strongly
supported.
General Discussion
We contribute to research concerned with social effectiveness at work by formally defining the con-
struct of WSSE and developing a measure for it. Based on two studies conducted using diverse sam-
ples of full-time employees, we believe that this new measure represents a promising addition to the
Table 3. Mediation of the Indirect Effects of WSSE on Outcome Variables Through Political Skill.
Mediation models Point estimate
BCa 95% CI
Lower Upper
WSSE à PS à workplace interpersonal conflict .0055*
[.0123, .0001]
WSSE à PS à physical symptoms .0255 [.0565, .0057]
WSSE à PS à job-related affective well-being .0048*
[.0001, .0108]
WSSE à PS à popularity .0070*
[.0030, .0128]
WSSE à PS à CWB-I targeted .0001 [.0039, .0055]
WSSE à PS à OCB-I targeted .0013 [.0045, .0063]
Note. BCa 95% CI ¼ bias corrected and accelerated 95% bootstrapping confidence intervals that include correction for med-
ian bias and skew. Bootstrapping results were based on 2,000 bootstrapped samples.
CWB-I ¼ Coworker-rated Interpersonal Counterproductive Work Behavior; OCB-I ¼ Coworker-rated Interpersonal
Organizational Citizenship Behavior; PS ¼ Political Skill; WSSE ¼ Workplace Social Self-Efficacy.
For models involving popularity, CWB-I, and OCB-I, n ¼ 97; for all other models, n ¼ 137.
*p .05.
104 Journal of Career Assessment 21(1)
104
at CITY UNIV OF HONG KONG on December 7, 2014
jca.sagepub.com
Downloaded from
16. nomological network of workplace social effectiveness constructs. WSSE fits within established
theoretical frameworks (Ferris et al., 2007), and it also exhibits some distinctive properties that
might make it uniquely useful in some types of future research.
The WSSE inventory has properties associated with a sound measure. Factor analyses established
that the WSSE inventory has a quite clean four-factor structure: (a) participating in social groups and
gatherings, (b) performance in public contexts, (c) conflict management, and (d) seeking and offer-
ing help. Both the WSSE total scale and the four subscales had excellent internal consistency as all a
coefficients were above .80. WSSE scores exhibited excellent convergent and discriminant validity.
We observed positive correlations with a general social self-efficacy measure (the PSSE scale), a
work-domain social effectiveness measure (the PSI), and a work-domain self-esteem measure, and
at the same time a much weaker correlation with a nonsocial domain self-confidence measure (the
Using Technology Skill Confidence scale). The moderate correlations between the WSSE scale and
the PSSE scale (r ¼ .67) and the PSI (r ¼ .55) suggested some overlap between these constructs, but
the shared variance between the WSSE and the PSI was modest enough to ward off concerns that the
measures tap identical domains (Lewis-Beck, 1980). With respect to criterion-related validity,
WSSE scores were found to be positively correlated to scores in job-related affective well-being,
negatively to number of physical symptoms experienced, and positively to coworker-rated
popularity and OCB-I targeted. The above findings strongly suggest that WSSE is a relevant
construct in organizational settings.
Our mediation analyses also support Ferris et al.’s (2007) proposal that self-efficacy is an
important antecedent of political skill. We found support for three of the six mediation analyses
we conducted. These results clearly show that WSSE fits well within the theoretical structures iden-
tified by Ferris and colleagues for social effectiveness in general (Ferris et al., 2002) and political
skill in particular (Ferris et al., 2007).
We found evidence that the WSSE scale is a better fit to work environments compared to the
more general measure of the PSSE scale. For instance, the WSSE scale has a four-factor structure,
whereas the PSSE scale has a single-factor structure. The WSSE items tap into both conflict and
nonconflict social situations, whereas the PSSE items omit the latter. Most importantly, the WSSE
items are all workplace related, and as a result, exhibited unique relationships with various organi-
zational variables above and beyond PSSE scores. As such, we conclude that a WSSE measure has
been justified.
Some additional findings are noteworthy. One such result involves the weak correlations between
WSSE and self-reported workplace interpersonal conflict, and between WSSE and self-reported IM.
Taken together and in the context of the many stronger relationships we observed involving WSSE,
these null findings are consistent with our argument that WSSE may represent a relatively pure
Table 4. Regression Analyses Examining the Unique Effects of WSSE and PSSE.
Predictors
Org. based
self-esteem
(n ¼ 137)
Political skill
(n ¼ 137)
Physical symp-
toms
(n ¼ 137)
Job-related
AWB
(n ¼ 137)
Coworker
rated popularity
(n ¼ 97)
Coworker
rated OCB-I
target (n ¼ 97)
Step 1 Step 2 Step 1 Step 2 Step 1 Step 2 Step 1 Step 2 Step 1 Step 2 Step 1 Step 2
PSSE .38** .04 .59** .42** .19* .14* .34** .19 .15 .09 .002 .27**
WSSE .50** .26** .08 .21* .36** .40**
R2
.14 .28 .35 .39 .04 .04 .11 .14 .02 .10 .00 .09
DR2
.14 .04 .00 .03 .08 .09
Note. *p .05. **p .01.
Job-related AWB ¼ job-related affective well-being; OCB-I ¼ coworker-rated interpersonal organizational citizenship
behavior.
Fan et al. 105
105
at CITY UNIV OF HONG KONG on December 7, 2014
jca.sagepub.com
Downloaded from
17. assessment of one’s social competence at work that is less inclusive of assessments of specific social
situations compared to other social effectiveness constructs (cf. political skill; Ferris et al., 2002).
The fact that WSSE seems to relate strongly to one dimension identified by Ferris et al. (2002)
as important to social effectiveness (self-focused assessments of one’s capacity to act) but much less
to the second (reading social situations) might have implications for future research concerned with
topics such as individuals’ development of political skill.
Finally, we did not propose specific hypotheses regarding the four WSSE subscales. Neverthe-
less, we observed some evidence that subscales are differentially correlated with various constructs
in the nomological network. For instance, the public performance subscale and the seeking and
offering help subscale were the strongest correlates of organization-based self-esteem, and the social
gathering subscale and the seeking and offering help subscale were the only two subscales that had
significant correlations with the workplace interpersonal conflict scale. These differential relation-
ships provide some initial support to our conceptualization of WSSE as a multidimensional con-
struct. Among the four WSSE subscales, the seeking and offering help subscale and the public
performance subscales appeared to have the strongest relationships to the correlates we examined.
This suggests that social activities related to these two subdomains are particularly instrumental in
bringing about beneficial outcomes for employees good at these activities. In contrast, the remaining
two WSSE subscales seemed to have more unique patterns of relationships relative to other con-
structs we studied. Future researchers should continue to examine whether and how WSSE total
scores and subscale scores similarly and differentially relate to relevant constructs in the
nomological network.
Limitations and Future Research Directions
Several limitations should be kept in mind when interpreting our results. One limitation is that even
though our two studies might be regarded as sufficient to develop and introduce the WSSE measure,
the present work contained only a single study that examined criteria. Future research is needed to
elaborate the placement of WSSE within the nomological net of social effectiveness. Another lim-
itation concerns the causality of our findings. We relied on prior theory about the placement of
WSSE relative to other constructs and we used peer ratings to alleviate the common method variance
problem in Study 2, but these measures do not fully address questions about direction of causality in
survey research. For instance, the mediation analyses we conducted were based on Ferris et al.’s
(2007) theorizing of self-efficacy as an antecedent of political skill and on the long history of con-
struing self-efficacy as an antecedent to skill development in learning, but we still cannot rule out the
possibility of a reverse causal flow. Specifically, it is also possible based on social cognitive theory
to construe WSSE as the mediator and political skill as the antecedent because assessments of ability
in performance situations might be based on perceptions of relevant skills. Future research manip-
ulating WSSE is needed to fully establish the direction of causality.
Still another limitation is that when collecting peer ratings, employees were asked to distribute
surveys to up to five of their coworkers, and employees may have chosen to give surveys to their
friends in the workplace, which may lead to inflated popularity, CWB, and OCB ratings. It is unclear
whether such inflations may result in the under- or overestimation of the correlations between PSSE
scores and these peer ratings. Future research with more rigorous methods of collecting peer-rating
data is needed to replicate our findings.
Future research might also examine WSSE as a moderator of relationships between workplace
social stressors and strains. Although we found some moderating tendency for WSSE scores in a few
exploratory analyses in Study 2, no significant results were found, probably due to our modest sam-
ple size and the difficulty of identifying interaction effects in survey studies. Nevertheless, future
106 Journal of Career Assessment 21(1)
106
at CITY UNIV OF HONG KONG on December 7, 2014
jca.sagepub.com
Downloaded from
18. researchers should investigate this important research question using larger samples and including
more social stressor and strain variables.
Practical Implications
One appealing feature of domain-related conceptualizations of self-efficacy is that they represent
self-efficacy perceptions as malleable, thus subject to external influences such as training and
coaching. Given the benefits associated with having a high level of WSSE, training programs can
be developed to boost employees’ WSSE, particularly in jobs requiring intensive social interactions.
In this regard, Bandura’s (1986, 1997) framework provides excellent strategies to boost WSSE.
Furthermore, employees’ WSSE total scores and subscale scores can serve as a diagnostic tool
before the training and as an evaluation tool after the training. Executive coaches and organizational
mentors can also use these scores to help trainees and protégés identify specific deficiency areas and
then develop plans to address them.
Conclusion
We developed and provided initial evidence for the utility of WSSE as an indicator of one dimension
of workplace social effectiveness. Our studies introduce WSSE as a relevant construct and show
how it complements existing theory, but more research is clearly needed to identify how this and
other constructs help us to understand the complex but important social worlds of employment.
Given the high stakes that are frequently attached to social interactions at work, we hope that our
research inspires others to investigate this critical domain.
Authors’ Note
Jinyan Fan and Robert C. Litchfield contributed equally to this article.
Declaration of Conflicting Interests
The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or
publication of this article.
Funding
The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
References
Andrews, M. C., Kacmar, K. M., Harris, K. (2009). Got political skill? The impact of justice on the
importance of political skill for job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1427–1437.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:
Prentice Hall.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Work.
Bandura, A. (2005). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In F. Pajares T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy
beliefs of adolescents (pp. 1–43). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
Bandura, A., Cervone, D. (1986). Differential engagement of self-reactive influences in cognitive motiva-
tion. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 38, 92–113.
Betz, N. E., Borgen, F., Rottinghaus, P., Paulsen, A., Halper, C. R., Harmon, L. W. (2003). The expanded
skills confidence inventory: Measuring basic domains of vocational activity. Journal of Vocational
Behavior, 62, 76–100.
Fan et al. 107
107
at CITY UNIV OF HONG KONG on December 7, 2014
jca.sagepub.com
Downloaded from
19. Betz, N. E., Harmon, L., Borgen, F. (1996). The relationships of self-efficacy for the Holland themes to gen-
der, occupational group membership, and vocational interests. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43,
90–98.
Bing, M. N., Whanger, J. C., Davison, H. K., VanHook, J. B. (2004). Incremental validity of the frame-of-
reference effect in personality scale scores: A replication and extension. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89,
150–157.
Blau, P. M. 1964. Exchange and power in social life. New York, NY: Wiley.
Brown, D. J., Cober, R. T., Kane, K., Levy, P. E., Shalhoop, J. (2006). Proactive personality and the success-
ful job search: A field investigation with college students. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 717–726.
Browne, M. W., Cudeck, R., Tateneni, K., Mels, G. (2004). CEFA: comprehensive exploratory factor
analysis, Version 2.00 [Computer software and manual]. Columbus: Department of Psychology, Ohio
State University.
Chen, G., Gully, S. M., Eden, D. (2001). Validation of a new general self-efficacy scale. Organizational
Research Methods, 4, 62–83.
Connolly, J. (1989). Social self-efficacy in adolescents: Relations with self-concept, social adjustment and
mental health. Journal of Behavioral Science, 21, 258–269.
De Dreu, C. K. W., Weingart, L. R. (2003). Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team
member satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 741–749.
Fabrigar, L. R., Wegner, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory
factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4, 272–299.
Fan, C., Mak, A. S. (1998). Measuring social self-efficacy in a culturally diverse student population. Social
Behavior and Personality, 26, 131–144.
Ferris, G. R., Perrewé, P. L., Douglas, C. (2002). Social effectiveness in organizations: Construct validity and
research questions. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 9, 49–63
Ferris, G. R., Treadway, D. C., Kolodinsky, R. W., Hochwarter, W. A., Kacmar, C. J., Douglas, C., . . . Frink,
D. D. (2005). Development and validation of the political skill inventory. Journal of Management, 31,
126–152.
Ferris, G. R., Treadway, D. C., Perrewé, P. L., Brouer, R. L., Douglas, C., Lux, S. (2007). Political skill in
organizations. Journal of Management, 33, 290–320.
Fichten, C. S., Bourdon, C. V., Amsel, R., Fox, L. (1987). Validation of the college Interaction Self-Efficacy
Questionnaire: Students with and without disabilities. Journal of College Student Personnel, 28, 449–458.
Harris, K. J., Harris, R. B., Brouer, R. L. (2009). LMX and subordinate political skill: Direct and interactive
effects on turnover intentions and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39, 2373–2395.
Hayes, A. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium.
Communication Monographs, 76, 408–420.
Ilgen, D. R., Pulakos, E. D. (1999). The changing nature of performance: Implications for staffing, motiva-
tion, and development. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and with-
out response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 85–98.
Jöreskog, K. G., Sörbom, D. (1996). LISREL8: User’s reference guide. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software.
Judge, T. A., Locke, E. A., Durham, C. C. (1997). The dispositional causes of job satisfaction: A core eva-
luations approach. Research in Organizational Behavior, 19, 151–188.
Lam, S. S., Chen, X.-P., Schaubroeck, J. (2002). Participative decision making and employee performance in
different cultures: The moderating effects of allocentrism/idiocentrism and efficacy. Academy of
Management Journal, 45, 905–914.
Larson, L. M. (1998). The social cognitive model of counselor training. The Counseling Psychologist, 26,
219–273.
Lee, K., Allen, N. J. (2002). Organizational citizenship behavior and workplace deviance: The role of affect
and cognitions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 131–142.
108 Journal of Career Assessment 21(1)
108
at CITY UNIV OF HONG KONG on December 7, 2014
jca.sagepub.com
Downloaded from
20. Lewis-Beck, M. S. (1980). Applied regression: An introduction. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., Sparrowe, R. T. (2000). An examination of the mediating role of psychological
empowerment on the relations between the job, interpersonal relationships, and work outcomes. Journal of
Applied Psychology, 85, 407–416.
Lin, S., Betz, N. (2009). Factors related to the social self-efficacy of Chinese international students. The
Counseling Psychologist, 37, 451–471.
Liu, C., Nauta, M. M., Spector, P. E., Li, C. (2008). Direct and indirect conflict at work in China and the US:
A cross-cultural comparison. Work Stress, 22, 295–313.
Liu, Y., Perrewé, P., Hochwarter, W. A., Kacmar, C. J. (2004). Dispositional antecedents and consequences
of emotional labor at work. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 10, 12–26.
Mathieu, J., Ahearne, M., Taylor, S. R. (2007). A longitudinal cross-level model of leader and salesperson
influences on sales force technology use and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 528–537.
Ng, K.-Y., Ang, S., Chan, K.-Y. (2008). Personality and leader effectiveness: A moderated mediation model
of leadership self-efficacy, job demands, and job autonomy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 733–743.
Paulhus, D. L. (1988). Paulhus deception scale (PDS): The Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding–7
user’s manual. North Tonawanda, NY: Multi-Health System.
Pierce, J. L., Gardner, D. G. (2004). Self-esteem within the work and organizational context: A review of the
organization-based self-esteem literature. Journal of Management, 30, 591–622.
Pierce, J. L., Gardner, D. G., Cummings, L. L., Dunham, R. B. (1989). Organization-based self-esteem:
Construct definition, operationalization, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 622–648.
Porath, C., Pearson, C., Shapiro, D. L. (1999). Turning the other cheek or an eye on an eye: Target’s
responses to incivility. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Chicago, IL.
Preacher, K. J., Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing
indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891.
Salovey, P., Meyer, J. D. (1990). Emotional intelligence. Imagination, Cognition, and Personality, 9,
185–211.
Scott, B. A., Judge, T. A. (2009). The popularity contest at work: Who wins, why, and what do they receive?
Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 20–33.
Sherer, M., Maddux, J. E., Mercadante, B., Prentice-Dunn, S., Jacobs, B., Rogers, R. W. (1982). The Self-
Efficacy Scale: Construction and validation. Psychological Reports, 51, 663–671.
Skaalvik, E. M., Skaalvik, S. (2007). Dimensions of teacher self-efficacy and relations with strain factors,
perceived collective teacher efficacy, and teacher burnout. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99,
611–625.
Smith, H. M., Betz, N. E. (2000). Development and validation of a scale of perceived social self-efficacy.
Journal of Career Assessment, 8, 283–301.
Spector, P. E., Jex, S. M. (1998). Development of four self-report measures of job stressors and strain:
Interpersonal Conflict at Work Scale, Organizational Constraints Scale, Quantitative Workload
Inventory, and Physical Symptoms Inventory. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 3, 356–367.
Tasa, K., Taggar, S., Seijts, G. H. (2007). The development of collective efficacy in teams: A multilevel and
longitudinal perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 17–27.
Tierney, P., Farmer, S. M. (2002). Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative
performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1137–1148.
Truxillo, D. M., Bauer, T. N., Campion, M. A., Paronto, M. E. (2002). Selection fairness information and
applicant reactions: A longitudinal field study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 1020–1031.
Van Katwyk, P. T., Fox, S., Spector, P. E., Kelloway, E. K. (2000). Using the job-related affective well-being
scale (JAWS) to investigate affective responses to work stressors. Journal of Occupational Health
Psychology, 5, 219–230.
Vancouver, J. B., More, K. M., Yoder, R. J. (2008). Self-efficacy and resource allocation: Support for a non-
monotonic, discontinuous model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 35–47.
Fan et al. 109
109
at CITY UNIV OF HONG KONG on December 7, 2014
jca.sagepub.com
Downloaded from
21. Wang, Q., Bowling, N. A., Eschleman, K. J. (2010). A meta-analytic examination of work and general locus
of control. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 761–768.
Wheeler, V. A., Ladd, G. W. (1982). Assessment of children’s self-efficacy for social interactions with peers.
Developmental Psychology, 18, 795–805.
Xie, D. (2007). Buffering or strengthening: The moderating effect of self-efficacy on stressor-strain relation-
ship. Journal of Career Assessment, 15, 351–366.
110 Journal of Career Assessment 21(1)
110
at CITY UNIV OF HONG KONG on December 7, 2014
jca.sagepub.com
Downloaded from