The study evaluates the efficacy of physics forceps compared to conventional forceps in preserving alveolar bone integrity during tooth extractions. Conducted on 100 healthy adults, the results demonstrated that physics forceps led to fewer fractures in the crown and buccal bone plate. The findings support the clinical value of physics forceps in performing atraumatic tooth removals.

1. EXPLORING NEW FRONTIERSWITH PHYSICS FORCEPS

2. Introduction:
 Exodontia is the most common procedure
performed in dental practice. Ideal tooth extraction
is defined as the painless removal of whole tooth or
tooth roots with minimal trauma to the investing
tissues, so the wound heals uneventfully with no
post-operative prosthetic problems.
 Fracture of alveolar bone.

3.  The instrument selection and the technique used for extraction
significantly affects the amount of paradental tissue loss. There have been
several new exciting technological advances with an increased interest
and the need for atraumatic tooth extraction. These advances has
revolutionized the field of dentistry and oral and maxillofacial surgery.

4. Dr. Richard Golden

5. Beak
Bumper

6. AIM & OBJECTIVES
The aims and objectives of present study is to evaluate the efficacy
of physics forceps over conventional forceps in maintaining the
intergrity of alveolar bone while performing extractions.

7. INCLUSION CRITERIA
-Healthy adult individuals.
-Patients requiring extraction of carious mandibular posteriors
-patients reqiuring extraction of firm teeth.
EXCLUSION CRITERIA
-Patient with uncontrolled systemic disease.
-patient having root stumps.
-patient having mobile teeth.

8. MATERIALS AND METHOD
100 adult patients seeking simple dental extraction
were selected from the Outpatient Clinic in the Oral and
Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Jaipur Dental College,
Rajasthan.
 Randomly Divided in 2 groups
Group I: 50 patients, physics forceps .
Group II: 50 patients, conventional forceps.

9. Procedure

10. RESULTS
PARAMETER * FORCEPS Crosstabulationa
FORCEPS Total
physics
forceps
Conventi
onal
forceps
PARAMETER CROWN
FRACTURE
Count 2 6 8
% within
FORCEPS
4.0% 12.0% 8.0
%
NO CROWN
FRACTURE
Count 48 44 92
% within
FORCEPS
96.0% 88.0% 92.0
%
Total Count 50 50 100
% within
FORCEPS
100.0% 100.0% 100.
0%
a. TOOTH = Total, VARIABLE = CROWN FRACTURE

11. PARAMETER * FORCEPS Crosstabulationa
FORCEPS Total
physics
forceps
Conventio
nal
forceps
PARAMETER BUCCAL BONE
PLATE FRACTURE
Count 2 4 6
% within
FORCEPS
4.0% 8.0% 6.0%
NO BUCCAL BONE
PLATE FRACTURE
Count 48 46 94
% within
FORCEPS
96.0% 92.0% 94.0
%
Total Count 50 50 100
% within
FORCEPS
100.0% 100.0% 100.0
%
a. TOOTH = Total, VARIABLE = BUCCAL BONE PLATE FRACTURE

12. PARAMETER * FORCEPS Crosstabulationa
FORCEPS Total
physics
forceps
Conventio
nal
forceps
PARAMETER NO ROOT
FRACTURE
Count 45 41 86
% within
FORCEPS
90.0% 82.0% 86.0
%
ROOT
FRACTURE
Count 5 9 14
% within
FORCEPS
10.0% 18.0% 14.0
%
Total Count 50 50 100
% within
FORCEPS
100.0% 100.0% 100.0
%
a. TOOTH = Total, VARIABLE = ROOT FRACTURE

13. DISCUSSION

18. DO NOT
SQUEEZE
THE HANDLES

19. Rotate, Rotate, Rotate
ONLYYOURWRIST

20. STOP !!
After 1-3 mm of movement

21. DELIVER
TOOTH
Out Of
Socket

23. CONCLUSION
 The physics forceps and its associated beak and bumper technique
is clinically valuable in atraumatic tooth removal and in preserving
the buccal bone plate.