The document is a report on global competitiveness published by the World Economic Forum. It contains an introduction by the editor Klaus Schwab, sections measuring and assessing national competitiveness using economic indicators, and data tables and country profiles.
Forum Economique Mondial: Rapport Global sur la Competitivite 2012-13Stanley Lucas
The Global Competitiveness and Benchmarking Network, with its annual Global Competitiveness Reports, and other topical and regional reports, offers a structured, systematic and comprehensive approach to identifying and measuring the drivers of economic performance of more than 140 economies. The Network’s portfolio of reports provides unique insight and data to inform strategies and constructive discussions among policy-makers, business leaders and civil society, while also providing material for independent academic research.
The Global Competitiveness and Benchmarking Network works with leading academics to ensure that the latest thinking and research on competitiveness are incorporated into its work. It collaborates with its network of more than 160 Partner Institutes to disseminate the findings of its research at national and regional levels.
1) The document is the Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 published by the World Economic Forum.
2) It was edited by Klaus Schwab, the executive chairman of the World Economic Forum, and its chief advisor was Xavier Sala-i-Martin of Columbia University.
3) The report assesses the competitiveness of nations and provides analysis to help countries improve their economic prosperity and social well-being.
VOYAGES & TOURISME: RAPPORT MONDIAL 2013 SUR LA COMPETITIVITEStanley Lucas
Le rapport fournit un éclairage intéressant sur la manière dont les pays encouragent le développement du secteur du voyage et du tourisme, il offre également une vue instantanée de la santé du secteur et de son rôle moteur dans la croissance économique mondiale. D`ailleurs, les emplois dans ce secteur représentent en moyenne 1 emploi sur 11. Le rapport souligne également que le secteur s`est montré résilient pendant le ralentissement, une preuve que le secteur du voyage et du tourisme peut être un facteur clé de diversification pour les marchés émergeants en leur offrant une valeur économique plus élevé.
Rajat Kathuria, Director & Chief Executive, ICRIER
Indonesia
Economic and Business Research Center, University of Indonesia
Djayadi Hanan, Director
Iraq
Iraqi National Investment Commission
Mohammed Al-Darraji, Commissioner
Ireland
Competitiveness Survey Group, Department of Economics,
University College Cork
Eleanor Doyle, Professor, Department of Economics
Niall O’Sullivan
Bernadette Power
National Competitiveness Council
Adrian Devitt, Manager
Michelle Nic Gearailt, Assistant Economist
Israel
Manufacturers’ Association of Israel (MAI)
Shraga Brosh,
The Global Information Technology Report 2012 examines the growing hyperconnected world and its impacts. It features the latest Networked Readiness Index rankings of 142 economies and explores key trends such as the convergence of information and communication technologies, the opportunities and challenges of living in a hyperconnected society, and case studies on leveraging ICT. The report provides insights for policymakers, businesses, and individuals on how to maximize the benefits and minimize the risks of digital transformation.
This document is the introduction to the Global Information Technology Report 2010-2011, which analyzes networked readiness and information and communication technology developments around the world. It was produced by the World Economic Forum and INSEAD. The report marks the 10th anniversary of assessing countries' networked readiness. It contains an executive summary and examines topics like the emerging internet economy, the role of ICT in economic and social transformations, and case studies of best practices in broadband development.
This document is the introduction to the Global Information Technology Report 2010-2011. It was edited by Soumitra Dutta of INSEAD and Irene Mia of the World Economic Forum. The report examines the networked readiness of economies worldwide and explores ICT-enabled transformations. It contains country profiles, case studies on best practices, and chapters on topics such as the emerging internet economy, building communities around digital highways, and the promise of technology. The report aims to assess networked readiness for the 10th year and analyze Transformations 2.0 brought about by information and communication technologies.
Forum Economique Mondial: Rapport Global sur la Competitivite 2012-13Stanley Lucas
The Global Competitiveness and Benchmarking Network, with its annual Global Competitiveness Reports, and other topical and regional reports, offers a structured, systematic and comprehensive approach to identifying and measuring the drivers of economic performance of more than 140 economies. The Network’s portfolio of reports provides unique insight and data to inform strategies and constructive discussions among policy-makers, business leaders and civil society, while also providing material for independent academic research.
The Global Competitiveness and Benchmarking Network works with leading academics to ensure that the latest thinking and research on competitiveness are incorporated into its work. It collaborates with its network of more than 160 Partner Institutes to disseminate the findings of its research at national and regional levels.
1) The document is the Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 published by the World Economic Forum.
2) It was edited by Klaus Schwab, the executive chairman of the World Economic Forum, and its chief advisor was Xavier Sala-i-Martin of Columbia University.
3) The report assesses the competitiveness of nations and provides analysis to help countries improve their economic prosperity and social well-being.
VOYAGES & TOURISME: RAPPORT MONDIAL 2013 SUR LA COMPETITIVITEStanley Lucas
Le rapport fournit un éclairage intéressant sur la manière dont les pays encouragent le développement du secteur du voyage et du tourisme, il offre également une vue instantanée de la santé du secteur et de son rôle moteur dans la croissance économique mondiale. D`ailleurs, les emplois dans ce secteur représentent en moyenne 1 emploi sur 11. Le rapport souligne également que le secteur s`est montré résilient pendant le ralentissement, une preuve que le secteur du voyage et du tourisme peut être un facteur clé de diversification pour les marchés émergeants en leur offrant une valeur économique plus élevé.
Rajat Kathuria, Director & Chief Executive, ICRIER
Indonesia
Economic and Business Research Center, University of Indonesia
Djayadi Hanan, Director
Iraq
Iraqi National Investment Commission
Mohammed Al-Darraji, Commissioner
Ireland
Competitiveness Survey Group, Department of Economics,
University College Cork
Eleanor Doyle, Professor, Department of Economics
Niall O’Sullivan
Bernadette Power
National Competitiveness Council
Adrian Devitt, Manager
Michelle Nic Gearailt, Assistant Economist
Israel
Manufacturers’ Association of Israel (MAI)
Shraga Brosh,
The Global Information Technology Report 2012 examines the growing hyperconnected world and its impacts. It features the latest Networked Readiness Index rankings of 142 economies and explores key trends such as the convergence of information and communication technologies, the opportunities and challenges of living in a hyperconnected society, and case studies on leveraging ICT. The report provides insights for policymakers, businesses, and individuals on how to maximize the benefits and minimize the risks of digital transformation.
This document is the introduction to the Global Information Technology Report 2010-2011, which analyzes networked readiness and information and communication technology developments around the world. It was produced by the World Economic Forum and INSEAD. The report marks the 10th anniversary of assessing countries' networked readiness. It contains an executive summary and examines topics like the emerging internet economy, the role of ICT in economic and social transformations, and case studies of best practices in broadband development.
This document is the introduction to the Global Information Technology Report 2010-2011. It was edited by Soumitra Dutta of INSEAD and Irene Mia of the World Economic Forum. The report examines the networked readiness of economies worldwide and explores ICT-enabled transformations. It contains country profiles, case studies on best practices, and chapters on topics such as the emerging internet economy, building communities around digital highways, and the promise of technology. The report aims to assess networked readiness for the 10th year and analyze Transformations 2.0 brought about by information and communication technologies.
Strelecky how foresight_can_be_beneficial_249atelier t*h
The document discusses trends in innovation and technology transfer. It notes that the level of innovation is low for small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in some European countries, particularly those from the former Eastern bloc, due to a lack of innovation culture and national innovation systems. It also states that foresight is missing from research and development activities, which hinders efficient technology transfer to companies. Additionally, the rate of innovation of new products and services is slow across Europe. The document emphasizes the importance of innovation for competitiveness and suggests that SMEs will play a larger role in providing flexibility to economies.
Scenario 4, "Paralyzing Protectionism," describes a world in 2050 where:
- Globalization has been reversed due to economic hardship and excessive nationalism leading countries to erect protectionist trade barriers.
- Resources have become scarce, technological development has lagged, and economies are in decline.
- High energy prices and dramatic resource scarcities have led to international conflicts over deposits.
- Little effort has been made to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, putting the world on a path to a 3.5°C temperature increase by 2100.
This document discusses innovations in country risk management across six nations. It highlights recent reforms to improve coordination of risk identification, assessment, and mitigation planning across hazards. Countries are working to strengthen critical infrastructure protection, community resilience, and post-disaster financial management. New tools aid consolidated multi-hazard risk assessment and prioritization of mitigation funding. Overall countries aim to enhance efficiency and effectiveness of disaster prevention, response, and recovery.
The document discusses the FinnSight 2015 foresight project conducted by the Academy of Finland and Tekes. It provides context for the project, noting Finland's advancement to an innovation-driven economy and need to develop new science, technology, and innovation solutions given rapid changes. The project aimed to identify key drivers impacting Finland, challenges for research and innovation, and areas of competence promoting welfare and competitiveness. It established 10 panels to explore themes deemed most important. The document introduces the driving forces analyzed by the panels, including globalization, technological changes, and societal and demographic shifts influencing Finland's future development.
Ankita Chakraborty Korea, Republic of
Korea Institute for Industrial Economics and Trade (KIET)
Indonesia Jae-Young Lee, Director, Center for International Trade Studies
Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA) Yong-Seok Choi, Senior Research Fellow
Arief Anshory Yusuf, Senior Economist Jung Hur, Research Fellow
Institute for Development of Economics and Finance (INDEF)
Dionisius A. Narjoko, Executive Director
Iran, Islamic Republic of
Management and Planning Organization of Iran
Mohammad Reza Farzanegan, Head of Economic Research
Department
Tatevik Vardanyan Botswana Institute for Development Policy Analysis (BIDPA)
Keith Jefferis, Senior Research Fellow
Australia Tebogo B. Seleka, Senior Research Fellow
Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, Masedi Seleka, Research Fellow
University of Melbourne
John P. Martin, Director Brazil
John Oster, Research Fellow IBRE/FGV—Fundação Getulio Vargas
Peter Whiteford, Professor Carlos Ari Sundfeld, Professor
Marcos Jank, Professor
Austria João Moutinho dos Santos, Researcher
WIFO—Austrian Institute of Economic Research Pedro da Motta Ve
Ankita Sinha Korea, Republic of
Korea Institute for Industrial Economics and Trade (KIET)
Indonesia Yong-Seok Jang, Senior Research Fellow
Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA) Jong-Wha Lee, Director and Professor
Yose Rizal Damuri, Head of Research Division Seung-Hoon Yoo, Research Fellow
Institute for Development of Economics and Finance (INDEF) Kosovo
Dicky Edwin, Researcher Riinvest Institute
Institute of Economic and Social Research, University of Indonesia Visar Ymeri, Executive Director
Asep Suryahadi, Executive Director Arben Mal
Maria Eugenia Di Paola Botswana
Botswana Institute for Development Policy Analysis (BIDPA)
Armenia Keith Jefferis, Senior Research Fellow
Armenian Center for National and International Studies (ACNIS) Masedi Seleka, Research Fellow
Gagik Yeganyan, Director
Armenak Karapetyan, Researcher Brazil
Fundação Dom Cabral (FDC)
Australia Sergio Lazzarini, Professor
Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, Marcelo Olivares, Professor
University of Melbourne Pedro Trettin, Professor
John P. Martin, Director
Austria Bulgaria
WIFO—
WEF World economic forum report _2011-12FTSA Academy
Rajat Kathuria, Director & Chief Executive, ICRIER
Indonesia
Economic and Business Research Center, University of Indonesia
Faisal Basri, Director
Iraq
Iraqi National Investment Commission
Mohammed Al-Darraji, Commissioner
Ireland
Competitiveness Survey Group, Department of Economics,
University College Cork
Eleanor Doyle, Professor, Department of Economics
Niall O’Sullivan
Bernadette Power
National Competitiveness Council
Adrian Devitt, Manager
Michelle Nic Gearailt, Assistant Economist
Israel
Manufacturers’ Association of Israel (MAI)
Shraga Brosh,
The document is a report titled "The Travel & Tourism Competitiveness Report 2013" published by the World Economic Forum. It examines factors that make economies competitive destinations for tourism. The report was produced in collaboration with various partner institutes and includes country/economy profiles, data on tourism competitiveness factors, and selected issues related to tourism competitiveness.
From the website: http://www.weforum.org
The 2013 Travel & Tourism Competitiveness Index (TTCI) reveals that Switzerland, Germany and Austria lead the world in terms of travel and tourism competitiveness, with Spain, the United Kingdom, the United States, France, Canada, Sweden and Singapore completing the top 10.
Tourism competitiveness is an important economic indicator. It is a major element in economic stimulation packages. Tourism is among the largest employers in most countries and also a fast-lane vehicle into the workforce for young people and women. Encouraging travel boosts consumer and business confidence, it strengthens two-way trade and promotes export income.
http://www.weforum.org/issues/travel-and-tourism-competitiveness/index.html
World Economic Forum, 'The Financial Development Report 2012'atul baride
The World Economic Forum Held In Gudgaon, Near New Delhi, India was attended by many Scholars, Academicians With Special reference to Indian Economy, Society and Politics and Businesses
1. The effects of the financial crisis continue to be felt globally as recovery efforts have stalled. Restoring confidence and trust in the financial system is needed to encourage investment and growth.
2. The Financial Development Report 2012 provides a framework to measure the factors, policies, institutions, intermediation, and access that play a role in achieving economic growth. The data can help identify areas for reform.
3. While the report relies on available data which have limitations, it establishes a comprehensive benchmark for financial systems and provides a common starting point for prioritizing reforms.
The document discusses The Global Competitiveness Report 2009–2010, which is in its 30th year of publication. It is being published during a major global economic slowdown. The report analyzes the productive potential and competitiveness of nations worldwide to help policymakers strengthen their countries' fundamentals for growth and development. It provides one of the most respected assessments of national competitiveness based on detailed analysis of 133 economies. The report includes rankings on the Global Competitiveness Index, country profiles highlighting strengths and weaknesses, and extensive data tables. It is produced in collaboration with partner institutes and the World Economic Forum's annual Executive Opinion Survey.
This document is the introduction to the Global Information Technology Report 2010-2011, which marks the 10th anniversary of the report series. It is composed of four main parts:
1) An assessment of the current state of networked readiness in the world using the Networked Readiness Index rankings of 138 economies.
2) Case studies of best practices in networked readiness from countries such as Costa Rica, Saudi Arabia, and the US.
3) Country/economy profiles of the 138 economies covered.
4) Presentation of the data and technical sources used in the report.
Wef global competitivenessreport_2013-14FTSA Academy
The document is a report titled "The Global Competitiveness Report 2013–2014: Full Data Edition" published by the World Economic Forum. It was edited by Professor Klaus Schwab, the founder and executive chairman of the World Economic Forum, and Professor Xavier Sala-i-Martín served as the chief advisor. The report assesses the competitiveness of 144 countries and is based on the Global Competitiveness Index and executive opinion surveys.
Strelecky how foresight_can_be_beneficial_249atelier t*h
The document discusses trends in innovation and technology transfer. It notes that the level of innovation is low for small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in some European countries, particularly those from the former Eastern bloc, due to a lack of innovation culture and national innovation systems. It also states that foresight is missing from research and development activities, which hinders efficient technology transfer to companies. Additionally, the rate of innovation of new products and services is slow across Europe. The document emphasizes the importance of innovation for competitiveness and suggests that SMEs will play a larger role in providing flexibility to economies.
Scenario 4, "Paralyzing Protectionism," describes a world in 2050 where:
- Globalization has been reversed due to economic hardship and excessive nationalism leading countries to erect protectionist trade barriers.
- Resources have become scarce, technological development has lagged, and economies are in decline.
- High energy prices and dramatic resource scarcities have led to international conflicts over deposits.
- Little effort has been made to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, putting the world on a path to a 3.5°C temperature increase by 2100.
This document discusses innovations in country risk management across six nations. It highlights recent reforms to improve coordination of risk identification, assessment, and mitigation planning across hazards. Countries are working to strengthen critical infrastructure protection, community resilience, and post-disaster financial management. New tools aid consolidated multi-hazard risk assessment and prioritization of mitigation funding. Overall countries aim to enhance efficiency and effectiveness of disaster prevention, response, and recovery.
The document discusses the FinnSight 2015 foresight project conducted by the Academy of Finland and Tekes. It provides context for the project, noting Finland's advancement to an innovation-driven economy and need to develop new science, technology, and innovation solutions given rapid changes. The project aimed to identify key drivers impacting Finland, challenges for research and innovation, and areas of competence promoting welfare and competitiveness. It established 10 panels to explore themes deemed most important. The document introduces the driving forces analyzed by the panels, including globalization, technological changes, and societal and demographic shifts influencing Finland's future development.
Ankita Chakraborty Korea, Republic of
Korea Institute for Industrial Economics and Trade (KIET)
Indonesia Jae-Young Lee, Director, Center for International Trade Studies
Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA) Yong-Seok Choi, Senior Research Fellow
Arief Anshory Yusuf, Senior Economist Jung Hur, Research Fellow
Institute for Development of Economics and Finance (INDEF)
Dionisius A. Narjoko, Executive Director
Iran, Islamic Republic of
Management and Planning Organization of Iran
Mohammad Reza Farzanegan, Head of Economic Research
Department
Tatevik Vardanyan Botswana Institute for Development Policy Analysis (BIDPA)
Keith Jefferis, Senior Research Fellow
Australia Tebogo B. Seleka, Senior Research Fellow
Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, Masedi Seleka, Research Fellow
University of Melbourne
John P. Martin, Director Brazil
John Oster, Research Fellow IBRE/FGV—Fundação Getulio Vargas
Peter Whiteford, Professor Carlos Ari Sundfeld, Professor
Marcos Jank, Professor
Austria João Moutinho dos Santos, Researcher
WIFO—Austrian Institute of Economic Research Pedro da Motta Ve
Ankita Sinha Korea, Republic of
Korea Institute for Industrial Economics and Trade (KIET)
Indonesia Yong-Seok Jang, Senior Research Fellow
Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA) Jong-Wha Lee, Director and Professor
Yose Rizal Damuri, Head of Research Division Seung-Hoon Yoo, Research Fellow
Institute for Development of Economics and Finance (INDEF) Kosovo
Dicky Edwin, Researcher Riinvest Institute
Institute of Economic and Social Research, University of Indonesia Visar Ymeri, Executive Director
Asep Suryahadi, Executive Director Arben Mal
Maria Eugenia Di Paola Botswana
Botswana Institute for Development Policy Analysis (BIDPA)
Armenia Keith Jefferis, Senior Research Fellow
Armenian Center for National and International Studies (ACNIS) Masedi Seleka, Research Fellow
Gagik Yeganyan, Director
Armenak Karapetyan, Researcher Brazil
Fundação Dom Cabral (FDC)
Australia Sergio Lazzarini, Professor
Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, Marcelo Olivares, Professor
University of Melbourne Pedro Trettin, Professor
John P. Martin, Director
Austria Bulgaria
WIFO—
WEF World economic forum report _2011-12FTSA Academy
Rajat Kathuria, Director & Chief Executive, ICRIER
Indonesia
Economic and Business Research Center, University of Indonesia
Faisal Basri, Director
Iraq
Iraqi National Investment Commission
Mohammed Al-Darraji, Commissioner
Ireland
Competitiveness Survey Group, Department of Economics,
University College Cork
Eleanor Doyle, Professor, Department of Economics
Niall O’Sullivan
Bernadette Power
National Competitiveness Council
Adrian Devitt, Manager
Michelle Nic Gearailt, Assistant Economist
Israel
Manufacturers’ Association of Israel (MAI)
Shraga Brosh,
The document is a report titled "The Travel & Tourism Competitiveness Report 2013" published by the World Economic Forum. It examines factors that make economies competitive destinations for tourism. The report was produced in collaboration with various partner institutes and includes country/economy profiles, data on tourism competitiveness factors, and selected issues related to tourism competitiveness.
From the website: http://www.weforum.org
The 2013 Travel & Tourism Competitiveness Index (TTCI) reveals that Switzerland, Germany and Austria lead the world in terms of travel and tourism competitiveness, with Spain, the United Kingdom, the United States, France, Canada, Sweden and Singapore completing the top 10.
Tourism competitiveness is an important economic indicator. It is a major element in economic stimulation packages. Tourism is among the largest employers in most countries and also a fast-lane vehicle into the workforce for young people and women. Encouraging travel boosts consumer and business confidence, it strengthens two-way trade and promotes export income.
http://www.weforum.org/issues/travel-and-tourism-competitiveness/index.html
World Economic Forum, 'The Financial Development Report 2012'atul baride
The World Economic Forum Held In Gudgaon, Near New Delhi, India was attended by many Scholars, Academicians With Special reference to Indian Economy, Society and Politics and Businesses
1. The effects of the financial crisis continue to be felt globally as recovery efforts have stalled. Restoring confidence and trust in the financial system is needed to encourage investment and growth.
2. The Financial Development Report 2012 provides a framework to measure the factors, policies, institutions, intermediation, and access that play a role in achieving economic growth. The data can help identify areas for reform.
3. While the report relies on available data which have limitations, it establishes a comprehensive benchmark for financial systems and provides a common starting point for prioritizing reforms.
The document discusses The Global Competitiveness Report 2009–2010, which is in its 30th year of publication. It is being published during a major global economic slowdown. The report analyzes the productive potential and competitiveness of nations worldwide to help policymakers strengthen their countries' fundamentals for growth and development. It provides one of the most respected assessments of national competitiveness based on detailed analysis of 133 economies. The report includes rankings on the Global Competitiveness Index, country profiles highlighting strengths and weaknesses, and extensive data tables. It is produced in collaboration with partner institutes and the World Economic Forum's annual Executive Opinion Survey.
This document is the introduction to the Global Information Technology Report 2010-2011, which marks the 10th anniversary of the report series. It is composed of four main parts:
1) An assessment of the current state of networked readiness in the world using the Networked Readiness Index rankings of 138 economies.
2) Case studies of best practices in networked readiness from countries such as Costa Rica, Saudi Arabia, and the US.
3) Country/economy profiles of the 138 economies covered.
4) Presentation of the data and technical sources used in the report.
Wef global competitivenessreport_2013-14FTSA Academy
The document is a report titled "The Global Competitiveness Report 2013–2014: Full Data Edition" published by the World Economic Forum. It was edited by Professor Klaus Schwab, the founder and executive chairman of the World Economic Forum, and Professor Xavier Sala-i-Martín served as the chief advisor. The report assesses the competitiveness of 144 countries and is based on the Global Competitiveness Index and executive opinion surveys.
This document is the introduction to the Global Information Technology Report 2010-2011. It was edited by Soumitra Dutta of INSEAD and Irene Mia of the World Economic Forum. The report examines the networked readiness of economies worldwide and explores ICT-enabled transformations. It contains country profiles, case studies on best practices, and chapters on topics such as the emerging internet economy, building communities around digital highways, and the promise of technology. The report aims to assess networked readiness for the 10th year and analyze Transformations 2.0 brought about by information and communication technologies.
The Global Competitiveness Report 2012–2013 Full Data EditionNavik Numsiang
The document is a report from the World Economic Forum titled "The Global Competitiveness Report 2012–2013". It was produced by the World Economic Forum and its partner institutes from various countries. The report contains an index that measures the competitiveness of nations, an assessment of nations' sustainable competitiveness, and results from an executive opinion survey of the business community. It provides country profiles, data tables, and technical details on research methodology.
The document is a report titled "The Global Competitiveness Report 2013–2014" published by the World Economic Forum. It assesses the competitiveness of 144 countries based on 12 pillars of competitiveness and provides country profiles for each economy. Klaus Schwab authored the preface and highlights that sustaining growth and building resilience will be key issues for policymakers. The report is the result of collaboration between the World Economic Forum and partner institutes around the world and includes analyses of competitiveness as well as country-level data.
The document is a report by the World Economic Forum on enabling trade globally. It was created through a collaboration between the World Economic Forum, Harvard University, and various partner institutes. The report contains the results of the Enabling Trade Index for 2010 and country/economy profiles that provide data and analyses of trade policies.
Wef global competitivenessreport_2012-13Antonio Glz
The document is the introduction to the Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013. It was produced by the World Economic Forum and provides an overview of the report, which measures the competitiveness of nations and aims to help countries achieve higher productivity. It acknowledges the partner institutes from various countries that contributed data and acknowledges the individuals involved in producing the report.
The document is the introduction to the Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013. It was produced by the World Economic Forum and its Global Benchmarking Network. The report assesses the competitiveness of over 140 economies worldwide and provides analysis on strengthening productivity to aid economic recovery. It uses the Global Competitiveness Index and executive opinion surveys to measure competitiveness.
The Global Competitiveness Report 2013–2014 overall economic efficiency by helping to ensure that businesses can communicate and decisions are made by economic actors taking into account all available relevant information. Third pillar: Macroeconomic environment The stability of the macroeconomic environment is important for business and, therefore, is significant for the overall competitiveness of a country.10 Although it is certainly true that macroeconomic stability alone cannot increase the productivity of a nation, it is also recognized that macroeconomic disarray harms the economy, as we have seen in recent years, notably in the European context. The government cannot provide services efficiently if it has to make high-interest payments on its past debts. Running fiscal deficits limits the government’s future ability to react to business cycles. Firms cannot operate efficiently when inflation rates are out of hand. In sum, the economy cannot grow in a sustainable manner unless the macro environment is stable. Macroeconomic stability captured the attention of the public most recently when some advanced economies, notably the United States and some European countries, needed to take urgent action to prevent macroeconomic instability when their public debt reached unsustainable levels in the wake of the global financial crisis. It is important to note that this pillar evaluates the stability of the macroeconomic environment, so it does not directly take into account the way in which public accounts are managed by the government. This qualitative dimension is captured in the institutions pillar described above. Fourth pillar: Health and primary education A healthy workforce is vital to a country’s competitiveness and productivity. Workers who are ill cannot function to their potential and will be less productive. Poor health leads to significant costs to business, as sick workers are often absent or operate at lower levels of efficiency. Investment in the provision of health services is thus critical for clear economic, as well as moral, considerations.11 In addition to health, this pillar takes into account the quantity and quality of the basic education received by the population, which is increasingly important in today’s economy. Basic education increases the efficiency of each individual worker. Moreover, often workers who have received little formal education can carry out only simple manual tasks and find it much more difficult to adapt to more advanced production processes and techniques, and therefore contribute less to devising or executing innovations. In other words, lack of basic education can become a constraint on business development, with firms finding it difficult to move up the value chain by producing more sophisticated or value- intensive products. Fifth pillar: Higher education and training Quality higher education and training is crucial for economies that want to move up the value chain beyond simple production processes
Similar to Wef global competitivenessreport_2012-13 (20)
Programming Foundation Models with DSPy - Meetup SlidesZilliz
Prompting language models is hard, while programming language models is easy. In this talk, I will discuss the state-of-the-art framework DSPy for programming foundation models with its powerful optimizers and runtime constraint system.
"Choosing proper type of scaling", Olena SyrotaFwdays
Imagine an IoT processing system that is already quite mature and production-ready and for which client coverage is growing and scaling and performance aspects are life and death questions. The system has Redis, MongoDB, and stream processing based on ksqldb. In this talk, firstly, we will analyze scaling approaches and then select the proper ones for our system.
Fueling AI with Great Data with Airbyte WebinarZilliz
This talk will focus on how to collect data from a variety of sources, leveraging this data for RAG and other GenAI use cases, and finally charting your course to productionalization.
Digital Banking in the Cloud: How Citizens Bank Unlocked Their MainframePrecisely
Inconsistent user experience and siloed data, high costs, and changing customer expectations – Citizens Bank was experiencing these challenges while it was attempting to deliver a superior digital banking experience for its clients. Its core banking applications run on the mainframe and Citizens was using legacy utilities to get the critical mainframe data to feed customer-facing channels, like call centers, web, and mobile. Ultimately, this led to higher operating costs (MIPS), delayed response times, and longer time to market.
Ever-changing customer expectations demand more modern digital experiences, and the bank needed to find a solution that could provide real-time data to its customer channels with low latency and operating costs. Join this session to learn how Citizens is leveraging Precisely to replicate mainframe data to its customer channels and deliver on their “modern digital bank” experiences.
[OReilly Superstream] Occupy the Space: A grassroots guide to engineering (an...Jason Yip
The typical problem in product engineering is not bad strategy, so much as “no strategy”. This leads to confusion, lack of motivation, and incoherent action. The next time you look for a strategy and find an empty space, instead of waiting for it to be filled, I will show you how to fill it in yourself. If you’re wrong, it forces a correction. If you’re right, it helps create focus. I’ll share how I’ve approached this in the past, both what works and lessons for what didn’t work so well.
What is an RPA CoE? Session 1 – CoE VisionDianaGray10
In the first session, we will review the organization's vision and how this has an impact on the COE Structure.
Topics covered:
• The role of a steering committee
• How do the organization’s priorities determine CoE Structure?
Speaker:
Chris Bolin, Senior Intelligent Automation Architect Anika Systems
Have you ever been confused by the myriad of choices offered by AWS for hosting a website or an API?
Lambda, Elastic Beanstalk, Lightsail, Amplify, S3 (and more!) can each host websites + APIs. But which one should we choose?
Which one is cheapest? Which one is fastest? Which one will scale to meet our needs?
Join me in this session as we dive into each AWS hosting service to determine which one is best for your scenario and explain why!
How information systems are built or acquired puts information, which is what they should be about, in a secondary place. Our language adapted accordingly, and we no longer talk about information systems but applications. Applications evolved in a way to break data into diverse fragments, tightly coupled with applications and expensive to integrate. The result is technical debt, which is re-paid by taking even bigger "loans", resulting in an ever-increasing technical debt. Software engineering and procurement practices work in sync with market forces to maintain this trend. This talk demonstrates how natural this situation is. The question is: can something be done to reverse the trend?
Dandelion Hashtable: beyond billion requests per second on a commodity serverAntonios Katsarakis
This slide deck presents DLHT, a concurrent in-memory hashtable. Despite efforts to optimize hashtables, that go as far as sacrificing core functionality, state-of-the-art designs still incur multiple memory accesses per request and block request processing in three cases. First, most hashtables block while waiting for data to be retrieved from memory. Second, open-addressing designs, which represent the current state-of-the-art, either cannot free index slots on deletes or must block all requests to do so. Third, index resizes block every request until all objects are copied to the new index. Defying folklore wisdom, DLHT forgoes open-addressing and adopts a fully-featured and memory-aware closed-addressing design based on bounded cache-line-chaining. This design offers lock-free index operations and deletes that free slots instantly, (2) completes most requests with a single memory access, (3) utilizes software prefetching to hide memory latencies, and (4) employs a novel non-blocking and parallel resizing. In a commodity server and a memory-resident workload, DLHT surpasses 1.6B requests per second and provides 3.5x (12x) the throughput of the state-of-the-art closed-addressing (open-addressing) resizable hashtable on Gets (Deletes).
Driving Business Innovation: Latest Generative AI Advancements & Success StorySafe Software
Are you ready to revolutionize how you handle data? Join us for a webinar where we’ll bring you up to speed with the latest advancements in Generative AI technology and discover how leveraging FME with tools from giants like Google Gemini, Amazon, and Microsoft OpenAI can supercharge your workflow efficiency.
During the hour, we’ll take you through:
Guest Speaker Segment with Hannah Barrington: Dive into the world of dynamic real estate marketing with Hannah, the Marketing Manager at Workspace Group. Hear firsthand how their team generates engaging descriptions for thousands of office units by integrating diverse data sources—from PDF floorplans to web pages—using FME transformers, like OpenAIVisionConnector and AnthropicVisionConnector. This use case will show you how GenAI can streamline content creation for marketing across the board.
Ollama Use Case: Learn how Scenario Specialist Dmitri Bagh has utilized Ollama within FME to input data, create custom models, and enhance security protocols. This segment will include demos to illustrate the full capabilities of FME in AI-driven processes.
Custom AI Models: Discover how to leverage FME to build personalized AI models using your data. Whether it’s populating a model with local data for added security or integrating public AI tools, find out how FME facilitates a versatile and secure approach to AI.
We’ll wrap up with a live Q&A session where you can engage with our experts on your specific use cases, and learn more about optimizing your data workflows with AI.
This webinar is ideal for professionals seeking to harness the power of AI within their data management systems while ensuring high levels of customization and security. Whether you're a novice or an expert, gain actionable insights and strategies to elevate your data processes. Join us to see how FME and AI can revolutionize how you work with data!
For the full video of this presentation, please visit: https://www.edge-ai-vision.com/2024/06/how-axelera-ai-uses-digital-compute-in-memory-to-deliver-fast-and-energy-efficient-computer-vision-a-presentation-from-axelera-ai/
Bram Verhoef, Head of Machine Learning at Axelera AI, presents the “How Axelera AI Uses Digital Compute-in-memory to Deliver Fast and Energy-efficient Computer Vision” tutorial at the May 2024 Embedded Vision Summit.
As artificial intelligence inference transitions from cloud environments to edge locations, computer vision applications achieve heightened responsiveness, reliability and privacy. This migration, however, introduces the challenge of operating within the stringent confines of resource constraints typical at the edge, including small form factors, low energy budgets and diminished memory and computational capacities. Axelera AI addresses these challenges through an innovative approach of performing digital computations within memory itself. This technique facilitates the realization of high-performance, energy-efficient and cost-effective computer vision capabilities at the thin and thick edge, extending the frontier of what is achievable with current technologies.
In this presentation, Verhoef unveils his company’s pioneering chip technology and demonstrates its capacity to deliver exceptional frames-per-second performance across a range of standard computer vision networks typical of applications in security, surveillance and the industrial sector. This shows that advanced computer vision can be accessible and efficient, even at the very edge of our technological ecosystem.