The Supreme Court heard arguments in Citizens United v. FEC dealing with campaign finance regulation. The conservative group Citizens United wanted to air a film about Hillary Clinton during her 2008 presidential campaign, which would have violated the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act. The Court ruled 5-4 that the section of the Act prohibiting corporate and union independent political expenditures violated the First Amendment. The ruling overturned precedents that had allowed increased regulation of campaign spending by corporations, finding that political speech cannot be restricted based on the speaker. It did not affect bans on direct candidate donations by corporations.
Redd e portfolio assignment #1 nmp665 core coursereddle11
This document discusses key concepts regarding nonprofits and government including:
1) Nonprofits have legal requirements for incorporation at the state level and tax exemption status from the IRS. They must adhere to lobbying and reporting rules to maintain this status.
2) Nonprofits serve as advocates for the public interest but government funding and regulations can impact this role. Excessive lobbying or political activity could jeopardize their tax status.
3) Increased involvement with government in advocacy and services can affect nonprofits' operations and ability to fulfill their missions. CEOs must understand laws/regulations to determine optimal government involvement.
9/9 FRI 9:30 | Combating Corruption By Being Ethical 2APA Florida
Nancy Stroud
The training session will focus on the new fourth section of the AICP Ethics Code. Included will be a dialogue about the ongoing ethical code efforts in Broward and Palm Beach counties to help combat the political corruption that has sent multiple city
and county commissioners, and at least one certified planner, to prison. A must hear for all planners.
This document discusses lobbying regulations under the Obama administration. It outlines three questions to determine if an activity constitutes lobbying, including if the communication is with a covered executive branch official and relates to policy formulation. It describes exceptions and key individuals considered covered officials. The document also summarizes increased restrictions under the Honest Leadership Act, including tougher sanctions, gift bans, and increased disclosure. It provides guidance on complying with Recovery Act and TARP fund lobbying policies. It stresses the importance of an effective compliance program to reduce legal risks and ensure lobbying activities sail through any audits.
The document summarizes the Supreme Court ruling in Citizens United v. FEC and its implications for corporate political spending. Some key points:
- The ruling struck down longstanding bans on corporate spending on political campaigns, allowing unlimited spending on electioneering communications.
- It overturned precedents that had upheld restrictions on corporate spending to influence elections directly.
- There is now no limit on independent expenditures by corporations, though coordination with candidates is still banned.
- The decision enables foreign-owned corporations to spend on US elections for the first time.
- Proponents argue it protects free speech rights, while critics warn it will undermine democracy by increasing corporate influence.
More case on casting a ballot, redistricting and race arrived at North Carolina's Supreme Court on Monday, as judges started choosing if two protected changes ought to be struck down on the grounds that legislators who put them on the polling form were chosen a debt of gratitude is in order for misshaped region limits.
https://uii.io/emariarr123
1) A lawsuit in California declared the state's ban on same-sex marriage unconstitutional, in an attempt to force a Supreme Court ruling that would legalize same-sex marriage nationwide. However, not all LGBT advocates supported this strategy, fearing an adverse Supreme Court decision.
2) While advocates want to win public support for same-sex marriage through ballot initiatives, they have so far been unsuccessful. Recent legislative victories in some states show progress, but achieving nationwide marriage equality through separate state laws is arduous.
3) The article argues that LGBT advocates must focus on strategies for winning ballot initiatives in order to achieve true social equality, as direct democracy will remain a key part of the political process for the foreseeable
Brian Dickerson. The Global Impact of the Foreign Corrup Practices 07.06.2013Awara Direct Search
This document summarizes several global anticorruption laws and enforcement trends related to the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA), Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), UK Bribery Act, and Russia's Countering Corruption Act. It discusses investigations and settlements with companies like Total SA and Microsoft. It also outlines enforcement priorities of the US Department of Justice, including a focus on specific industries and increasing civil and criminal penalties.
The Supreme Court heard arguments in Citizens United v. FEC dealing with campaign finance regulation. The conservative group Citizens United wanted to air a film about Hillary Clinton during her 2008 presidential campaign, which would have violated the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act. The Court ruled 5-4 that the section of the Act prohibiting corporate and union independent political expenditures violated the First Amendment. The ruling overturned precedents that had allowed increased regulation of campaign spending by corporations, finding that political speech cannot be restricted based on the speaker. It did not affect bans on direct candidate donations by corporations.
Redd e portfolio assignment #1 nmp665 core coursereddle11
This document discusses key concepts regarding nonprofits and government including:
1) Nonprofits have legal requirements for incorporation at the state level and tax exemption status from the IRS. They must adhere to lobbying and reporting rules to maintain this status.
2) Nonprofits serve as advocates for the public interest but government funding and regulations can impact this role. Excessive lobbying or political activity could jeopardize their tax status.
3) Increased involvement with government in advocacy and services can affect nonprofits' operations and ability to fulfill their missions. CEOs must understand laws/regulations to determine optimal government involvement.
9/9 FRI 9:30 | Combating Corruption By Being Ethical 2APA Florida
Nancy Stroud
The training session will focus on the new fourth section of the AICP Ethics Code. Included will be a dialogue about the ongoing ethical code efforts in Broward and Palm Beach counties to help combat the political corruption that has sent multiple city
and county commissioners, and at least one certified planner, to prison. A must hear for all planners.
This document discusses lobbying regulations under the Obama administration. It outlines three questions to determine if an activity constitutes lobbying, including if the communication is with a covered executive branch official and relates to policy formulation. It describes exceptions and key individuals considered covered officials. The document also summarizes increased restrictions under the Honest Leadership Act, including tougher sanctions, gift bans, and increased disclosure. It provides guidance on complying with Recovery Act and TARP fund lobbying policies. It stresses the importance of an effective compliance program to reduce legal risks and ensure lobbying activities sail through any audits.
The document summarizes the Supreme Court ruling in Citizens United v. FEC and its implications for corporate political spending. Some key points:
- The ruling struck down longstanding bans on corporate spending on political campaigns, allowing unlimited spending on electioneering communications.
- It overturned precedents that had upheld restrictions on corporate spending to influence elections directly.
- There is now no limit on independent expenditures by corporations, though coordination with candidates is still banned.
- The decision enables foreign-owned corporations to spend on US elections for the first time.
- Proponents argue it protects free speech rights, while critics warn it will undermine democracy by increasing corporate influence.
More case on casting a ballot, redistricting and race arrived at North Carolina's Supreme Court on Monday, as judges started choosing if two protected changes ought to be struck down on the grounds that legislators who put them on the polling form were chosen a debt of gratitude is in order for misshaped region limits.
https://uii.io/emariarr123
1) A lawsuit in California declared the state's ban on same-sex marriage unconstitutional, in an attempt to force a Supreme Court ruling that would legalize same-sex marriage nationwide. However, not all LGBT advocates supported this strategy, fearing an adverse Supreme Court decision.
2) While advocates want to win public support for same-sex marriage through ballot initiatives, they have so far been unsuccessful. Recent legislative victories in some states show progress, but achieving nationwide marriage equality through separate state laws is arduous.
3) The article argues that LGBT advocates must focus on strategies for winning ballot initiatives in order to achieve true social equality, as direct democracy will remain a key part of the political process for the foreseeable
Brian Dickerson. The Global Impact of the Foreign Corrup Practices 07.06.2013Awara Direct Search
This document summarizes several global anticorruption laws and enforcement trends related to the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA), Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), UK Bribery Act, and Russia's Countering Corruption Act. It discusses investigations and settlements with companies like Total SA and Microsoft. It also outlines enforcement priorities of the US Department of Justice, including a focus on specific industries and increasing civil and criminal penalties.
The document discusses the history and evolution of civil service reform and political activity restrictions for federal government employees in the United States. It covers the replacement of the spoils system under Andrew Jackson, the Pendleton Civil Service Reform Act passed in response to the Garfield assassination, and subsequent laws like the Hatch Act that further regulated political activities of federal workers and expanded restrictions to state/local employees. It also discusses court cases that upheld these laws as constitutional.
This document discusses the history and process of presidential elections in the United States. It covers the evolution from selections by Congress to nominations by political parties and presidential primaries. Key aspects of the electoral process outlined include qualifications for the presidency in the Constitution, the Electoral College system, methods of selecting electors, and thresholds for winning the election. The document also examines debates around the strengths and weaknesses of the current electoral system.
The document summarizes the expansion of suffrage and voting rights in the United States over time. It discusses how voting was initially only granted to white male property owners but has expanded to include all races, both sexes above age 18. The document also outlines the various stages of this expansion, from eliminating property and religious requirements to amendments granting women and younger adults the right to vote. Finally, it discusses current issues around voter registration, identification laws, and factors that influence voter behavior.
The document discusses the history and evolution of the presidential nomination and election process in the United States. It covers topics like the shift from congressional selection of candidates to party conventions and primaries, the rise of campaigning directly to voters, and reforms to the primary process. It also outlines the qualifications for president according to the Constitution, how the Electoral College system works, and debates around the current electoral system.
- Privacy issues will continue to be a major concern for Congress and the upcoming elections, fueled by increased computer and internet usage. While industry self-regulation was previously preferred, there is now support for more aggressive privacy regulation, especially around financial and medical information.
- The FTC now supports new regulatory powers over companies collecting personal data online, while the Administration focuses on financial and medical privacy. Congress remains reluctant to pass comprehensive privacy laws.
- Several bills have been introduced to address privacy, including establishing a commission to study existing laws and make recommendations, and strengthening protections for financial and medical privacy data. However, opponents argue these approaches could delay needed legislation.
The document discusses the history of voting rights and political participation in Texas. It describes how, before the Civil War, slaves had no voting rights, and after the Civil War black men gained voting rights which were then restricted when Democrats regained control. It also discusses how women gained the right to vote in 1920 and how the white primary, poll tax, and other measures were used to disenfranchise black and minority voters until being struck down by the courts. The document also outlines current voter registration and election processes in Texas including qualifications, types of elections, and the challenges of campaigning statewide.
The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the Pharmaceutical Industrydominiclai
The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) prohibits bribery of foreign officials and requires accurate record keeping. It is highly relevant for pharmaceutical companies because they conduct many international clinical trials and operate in countries with national healthcare systems. Enforcement of the FCPA has increased in recent years, with over $1.5 billion in fines in 2010. Companies can minimize risk by voluntarily disclosing issues, establishing rigorous compliance policies, and following OECD anti-bribery guidelines endorsed by 38 countries.
Critical Broadband Policy Issues: National & MNAnn Treacy
JoAnne Johnson from U-reka Broadband Ventures presents a webinar for the Blandin Foundation Broadband Initiative. JoAnne tackles policy issues at both the Federal and State level:
Federal policy – The Universal Service Reform Discussion: Who is lining up where and why?
State policy – How do we move policy creation to strategy implementation and why hasn’t anything happened?
This document discusses how systems theory applies to the U.S. government and its role in international business. It outlines the three branches of government - legislative, executive, judicial - and how each self-regulates through feedback loops and communications between branches. The executive branch in particular functions as both an autopoietic (self-regulating) and allopoietic (creating things external to itself) system when conducting international business. Examples are given of how government policymaking involves many interconnected influences and works to maintain stability through its open-yet-rule-bound interactions with other countries on issues like climate change, trade, and foreign policy.
Speech to Lincoln MA Town Meeting March 24, 2012 in support of constitutional amendment to eliminate the right of corporations to the rights in the Constitution that belong to "the people."
This document is the statement of the National Association of Mutual Insurance Companies submitted to the US Senate Committee on Commerce, Science & Transportation regarding federal involvement in insurance regulation. It argues that a reformed system of state regulation is superior to federal regulation for the following reasons: states understand local needs better; federal regulation could impose unwanted social policies; and a federal system would increase costs and bureaucracy without clear benefits for consumers. The document advocates for reforms to state regulation, especially related to rate-setting, to create a more competitive, consistent system that benefits both consumers and the insurance industry.
William M. Sullivan Jr. - Partner, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLPworldwidebranding
The document profiles William M. Sullivan Jr., a partner at Pillsbury Law specializing in white collar criminal defense and corporate investigations. It provides details on his extensive experience representing clients in matters involving the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, antitrust issues, securities litigation, and other white collar and regulatory areas. It also lists Mr. Sullivan's education and professional honors, as well as recent representative matters and speaking engagements.
The document contains multiple choice questions from past AP Government tests covering various topics in American government and politics. It tests knowledge of topics like:
- The process for amending the Constitution
- Checks and balances between the three branches of government
- Federalism and the division of power between national and state governments
- Key Supreme Court cases that established important principles
- The role and impact of political parties, interest groups, and elections
- Trends in voter turnout and participation over time
The document lists three branches of the US government: the Presidency, the Congress, and the Judiciary. It then lists Norman as the author. The summary provides a high-level overview without analyzing or evaluating the content:
The document discusses the three branches of the US government - the Presidency, Congress, and Judiciary. It is authored by Norman.
Read Case 2-6 on page 59- Answer the question- -Should corporations ha.docxlmarie40
The document discusses the Citizens United v. FEC Supreme Court case regarding campaign finance regulation. It provides background on the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act and Citizens United's challenge to the law over its documentary criticizing Hillary Clinton. The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that the law violated the First Amendment by restricting corporate independent political expenditures. While direct contributions to candidates can be limited, the government cannot ban corporations from seeking to persuade the public through means like TV ads. The document poses questions on whether the ruling applies to books, if corporations have constitutional rights, and if President Obama's criticism of the ruling was correct.
Federal election commission and citizens unitedalwaysalwaysfun
The Supreme Court case Citizens United v. FEC centered around a documentary film called "Hillary: The Movie" produced by Citizens United intended to influence voters against Hillary Clinton. The Federal Election Commission prevented the film's release on TV due to the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act banning corporate electioneering communications within 30 days of a primary. Citizens United sued and the Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that the BCRA restrictions violated free speech by limiting corporate independent political expenditures. The decision was controversial and opened the door for unlimited corporate spending on political campaigns.
This document provides background on publicly financed political campaigns in the United States. It discusses the history of campaign finance laws and Supreme Court cases that have impacted this issue. Specifically, it outlines the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 which established disclosure requirements and contribution limits, and how the 1976 Supreme Court case Buckley v. Valeo challenged aspects of this act and established that political donations are a form of protected political speech. The document argues that while limiting donations is no longer viable, incentivizing small donations from regular citizens could help counter large donations from corporations and wealthy donors.
The document discusses several topics related to political parties in the United States including what they are, their functions, the origins of the two-party system, different types of party systems, and aspects of how U.S. political parties operate such as nominating candidates, funding campaigns, and enforcing campaign finance laws.
The document summarizes the Supreme Court ruling in Citizens United v. FEC and its implications for corporate political spending. Some key points:
- The ruling struck down longstanding bans on corporate spending on political campaigns, allowing unlimited spending on electioneering communications.
- It overturned precedents that had upheld restrictions on corporate spending to influence elections directly.
- There is now no limit on independent expenditures by corporations, though coordination with candidates is still banned.
- The decision enables foreign-owned corporations to spend on US elections for the first time.
- Proponents argue it protects free speech rights, while critics warn it will undermine democracy by increasing corporate influence.
The document discusses the history and evolution of civil service reform and political activity restrictions for federal government employees in the United States. It covers the replacement of the spoils system under Andrew Jackson, the Pendleton Civil Service Reform Act passed in response to the Garfield assassination, and subsequent laws like the Hatch Act that further regulated political activities of federal workers and expanded restrictions to state/local employees. It also discusses court cases that upheld these laws as constitutional.
This document discusses the history and process of presidential elections in the United States. It covers the evolution from selections by Congress to nominations by political parties and presidential primaries. Key aspects of the electoral process outlined include qualifications for the presidency in the Constitution, the Electoral College system, methods of selecting electors, and thresholds for winning the election. The document also examines debates around the strengths and weaknesses of the current electoral system.
The document summarizes the expansion of suffrage and voting rights in the United States over time. It discusses how voting was initially only granted to white male property owners but has expanded to include all races, both sexes above age 18. The document also outlines the various stages of this expansion, from eliminating property and religious requirements to amendments granting women and younger adults the right to vote. Finally, it discusses current issues around voter registration, identification laws, and factors that influence voter behavior.
The document discusses the history and evolution of the presidential nomination and election process in the United States. It covers topics like the shift from congressional selection of candidates to party conventions and primaries, the rise of campaigning directly to voters, and reforms to the primary process. It also outlines the qualifications for president according to the Constitution, how the Electoral College system works, and debates around the current electoral system.
- Privacy issues will continue to be a major concern for Congress and the upcoming elections, fueled by increased computer and internet usage. While industry self-regulation was previously preferred, there is now support for more aggressive privacy regulation, especially around financial and medical information.
- The FTC now supports new regulatory powers over companies collecting personal data online, while the Administration focuses on financial and medical privacy. Congress remains reluctant to pass comprehensive privacy laws.
- Several bills have been introduced to address privacy, including establishing a commission to study existing laws and make recommendations, and strengthening protections for financial and medical privacy data. However, opponents argue these approaches could delay needed legislation.
The document discusses the history of voting rights and political participation in Texas. It describes how, before the Civil War, slaves had no voting rights, and after the Civil War black men gained voting rights which were then restricted when Democrats regained control. It also discusses how women gained the right to vote in 1920 and how the white primary, poll tax, and other measures were used to disenfranchise black and minority voters until being struck down by the courts. The document also outlines current voter registration and election processes in Texas including qualifications, types of elections, and the challenges of campaigning statewide.
The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the Pharmaceutical Industrydominiclai
The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) prohibits bribery of foreign officials and requires accurate record keeping. It is highly relevant for pharmaceutical companies because they conduct many international clinical trials and operate in countries with national healthcare systems. Enforcement of the FCPA has increased in recent years, with over $1.5 billion in fines in 2010. Companies can minimize risk by voluntarily disclosing issues, establishing rigorous compliance policies, and following OECD anti-bribery guidelines endorsed by 38 countries.
Critical Broadband Policy Issues: National & MNAnn Treacy
JoAnne Johnson from U-reka Broadband Ventures presents a webinar for the Blandin Foundation Broadband Initiative. JoAnne tackles policy issues at both the Federal and State level:
Federal policy – The Universal Service Reform Discussion: Who is lining up where and why?
State policy – How do we move policy creation to strategy implementation and why hasn’t anything happened?
This document discusses how systems theory applies to the U.S. government and its role in international business. It outlines the three branches of government - legislative, executive, judicial - and how each self-regulates through feedback loops and communications between branches. The executive branch in particular functions as both an autopoietic (self-regulating) and allopoietic (creating things external to itself) system when conducting international business. Examples are given of how government policymaking involves many interconnected influences and works to maintain stability through its open-yet-rule-bound interactions with other countries on issues like climate change, trade, and foreign policy.
Speech to Lincoln MA Town Meeting March 24, 2012 in support of constitutional amendment to eliminate the right of corporations to the rights in the Constitution that belong to "the people."
This document is the statement of the National Association of Mutual Insurance Companies submitted to the US Senate Committee on Commerce, Science & Transportation regarding federal involvement in insurance regulation. It argues that a reformed system of state regulation is superior to federal regulation for the following reasons: states understand local needs better; federal regulation could impose unwanted social policies; and a federal system would increase costs and bureaucracy without clear benefits for consumers. The document advocates for reforms to state regulation, especially related to rate-setting, to create a more competitive, consistent system that benefits both consumers and the insurance industry.
William M. Sullivan Jr. - Partner, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLPworldwidebranding
The document profiles William M. Sullivan Jr., a partner at Pillsbury Law specializing in white collar criminal defense and corporate investigations. It provides details on his extensive experience representing clients in matters involving the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, antitrust issues, securities litigation, and other white collar and regulatory areas. It also lists Mr. Sullivan's education and professional honors, as well as recent representative matters and speaking engagements.
The document contains multiple choice questions from past AP Government tests covering various topics in American government and politics. It tests knowledge of topics like:
- The process for amending the Constitution
- Checks and balances between the three branches of government
- Federalism and the division of power between national and state governments
- Key Supreme Court cases that established important principles
- The role and impact of political parties, interest groups, and elections
- Trends in voter turnout and participation over time
The document lists three branches of the US government: the Presidency, the Congress, and the Judiciary. It then lists Norman as the author. The summary provides a high-level overview without analyzing or evaluating the content:
The document discusses the three branches of the US government - the Presidency, Congress, and Judiciary. It is authored by Norman.
Read Case 2-6 on page 59- Answer the question- -Should corporations ha.docxlmarie40
The document discusses the Citizens United v. FEC Supreme Court case regarding campaign finance regulation. It provides background on the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act and Citizens United's challenge to the law over its documentary criticizing Hillary Clinton. The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that the law violated the First Amendment by restricting corporate independent political expenditures. While direct contributions to candidates can be limited, the government cannot ban corporations from seeking to persuade the public through means like TV ads. The document poses questions on whether the ruling applies to books, if corporations have constitutional rights, and if President Obama's criticism of the ruling was correct.
Federal election commission and citizens unitedalwaysalwaysfun
The Supreme Court case Citizens United v. FEC centered around a documentary film called "Hillary: The Movie" produced by Citizens United intended to influence voters against Hillary Clinton. The Federal Election Commission prevented the film's release on TV due to the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act banning corporate electioneering communications within 30 days of a primary. Citizens United sued and the Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that the BCRA restrictions violated free speech by limiting corporate independent political expenditures. The decision was controversial and opened the door for unlimited corporate spending on political campaigns.
This document provides background on publicly financed political campaigns in the United States. It discusses the history of campaign finance laws and Supreme Court cases that have impacted this issue. Specifically, it outlines the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 which established disclosure requirements and contribution limits, and how the 1976 Supreme Court case Buckley v. Valeo challenged aspects of this act and established that political donations are a form of protected political speech. The document argues that while limiting donations is no longer viable, incentivizing small donations from regular citizens could help counter large donations from corporations and wealthy donors.
The document discusses several topics related to political parties in the United States including what they are, their functions, the origins of the two-party system, different types of party systems, and aspects of how U.S. political parties operate such as nominating candidates, funding campaigns, and enforcing campaign finance laws.
The document summarizes the Supreme Court ruling in Citizens United v. FEC and its implications for corporate political spending. Some key points:
- The ruling struck down longstanding bans on corporate spending on political campaigns, allowing unlimited spending on electioneering communications.
- It overturned precedents that had upheld restrictions on corporate spending to influence elections directly.
- There is now no limit on independent expenditures by corporations, though coordination with candidates is still banned.
- The decision enables foreign-owned corporations to spend on US elections for the first time.
- Proponents argue it protects free speech rights, while critics warn it will undermine democracy by increasing corporate influence.
This dissertation examines the tension between political voice and vote in U.S. liberal democracy as reflected in Supreme Court jurisprudence on election law. It argues that the Court's Citizens United decision, which struck down limits on corporate political spending, elevated the corporate voice over the individual vote. This decision was preceded by two stages - first, the Court briefly elevated the power of the vote in the 1960s, then raised the power of political expression over the vote in Buckley v. Valeo and Citizens United. The dissertation will analyze how the Court arrived at prioritizing voice over vote by exploring the complex relationship between liberty and equality in American liberalism and the culture of legalism that privileges liberty. It will also consider the
The document provides an overview of key concepts in U.S. government and politics, including political culture, parties, elections, branches of government, interest groups, and policies/documents. Some key topics covered include political socialization, voting demographics, media influence, political ideologies, primary elections, the electoral college system, congressional committees, executive powers, Supreme Court cases, and the federal bureaucracy.
The document summarizes the history of corporate personhood in the United States, including key Supreme Court cases. It discusses how the 1886 Santa Clara County ruling established that corporations have rights as persons, and how the 2010 Citizens United decision found that restricting corporate political spending violates free speech rights. The decision is controversial as critics argue unlimited corporate money in elections undermines democracy, while supporters see it as protecting free speech. Proposals to reverse the decision include a constitutional amendment or campaign finance reform.
Citizens United v. Federal Election CommissionFor more than 100 .docxmonicafrancis71118
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission
For more than 100 years Congress and the Supreme Court carefully fashioned laws to check corporate power in elections. At first, the restraints were loose, but over the years they tightened. There were de- bates and a few dissents, but the nation never hesi- tated in its direction—until 2010 when five justices of the Supreme Court decided to reverse course. This is the story of their decision. It begins in the nation’s youth.
CONGRESS PROTECTS
ELECTIONS
In the American philosophy of self-government, free elections are an indispensable bulwark against tyranny. The founders believed all citizens should have the right to vote, that their votes should count equally, and that a majority should prevail. The rules in the Constitution bound the young nation to these ideals. The Founding Fathers also believed that if citizens were to vote wisely, they needed full, open debate on candidates and issues. The central purpose of the First Amendment, which directs that “Congress shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech,” is to protect this debate.
In the early years of the republic the practice largely accorded with the ideal. The first challenge came right after the Civil War when violence and intimidation kept freed slaves from the polls. Con- gress passed two Enforcement Acts in 1870 and 1871 to protect the freed slaves’ right to vote and these were the first election laws. The Supreme Court eventually upheld “the [constitutional] power of [C]ongress to make such provisions as are necessary to secure the fair and honest conduct of an election.”1
A second challenge to “fair and honest conduct” in elections arose when industrial growth created pools of great wealth. By the 1870s railroads were already spending heavily for political favors. In 1873 Jay Gould, owner of the Erie Railroad, explained his businesslike approach to elections.
It was the custom when men received nominations to come to me for contributions, and I made them and considered them good paying dividends for the company; in a republican district I was a strong re- publican, in a democratic district I was democratic, and in doubtful districts I was doubtful; in politics
I was an Erie railroad man every time.2
As time passed, the amounts of business money in elections grew. So did public perception of corrup- tion, real and imagined. Standard Oil is reported to have given a check for $250,000 (about $6.4 million in current dollars) to reelect McKinley in 1900. In 1905 an investigation of New York insurance companies inflamed the nation. It revealed they had spent hundreds of thousands of dollars electing state and national politicians. A prominent Republican boss, when asked if these contributions bought favors, re- plied: “That’s naturally what would be involved.”3 The investigation also revealed a $50,000 ($1.2 mil- lion in today’s dollars) donation from New York Life to President Theodore Roosevelt in 1904. Roosevelt, who had s.
Elections allow citizens a direct say in who leads through voting. While providing accountability, elections can also lead to instability if the victor lacks a clear majority. The US system incorporates mechanisms like the Electoral College to prevent pure direct democracy and reduce instability. Over time, constitutional amendments and laws have expanded voting rights and standardized election procedures, though turning out voters remains a challenge and money plays a large role in political campaigns.
This document provides an introduction and background on campaign finance law and regulation in the United States. It discusses key Supreme Court rulings on campaign finance from Buckley v. Valeo in 1976 to Citizens United v. FEC in 2010. Scholars are divided on whether Citizens United represented a break from precedent or was consistent with previous rulings. The author argues that FEC v. Wisconsin Right to Life Inc. in 2007 established the framework that Citizens United built upon, not representing a true break from precedent. The document aims to examine these court rulings in detail to determine how and why campaign finance regulation changed over time.
Campaign finance reform aims to regulate political spending and funding sources. Current regulations include contribution limits, disclosure requirements, and public financing options. However, recent Supreme Court rulings have loosened some restrictions by allowing unlimited independent expenditures and treating corporations similarly to people in terms of political spending. Critics argue this disproportionately benefits wealthy interests and undermines democracy, while supporters see it as protecting free speech. The impact of money in politics continues to be widely debated.
The correct answers are:
C) Russ Feingold and John McCain
A) Citizens united v. Federal Elections Commission
B) Buckley v. Valeo
C) Campaign Finance Reform Act
D) Hard money, soft money
B) Federal Election Commission
This document summarizes key issues regarding election systems in New York and the United States, focusing on campaign finance, access to voting, and voter eligibility. It provides a brief history of laws and debates around each issue area. For campaign finance, it discusses the history of expenditure limits, contribution limits, disclosure requirements, and public financing. For access, it examines voting methods and identification requirements. For eligibility, it outlines who is allowed to vote. The document also summarizes current debates around strengthening enforcement of campaign finance laws in New York State.
This document provides an overview of voter fraud in the United States. It discusses what constitutes voter fraud, the methodology used in previous research on the topic, and a framework for understanding fraud. Key points include that organized fraud is more common than individual fraud, local political machines historically played a role in election fraud but have since declined, and election administration has become stronger over time which has reduced opportunities for fraud. Major cases of alleged fraud are also examined. The document aims to provide better information and analysis on voter fraud to inform election reform debates.
This document discusses how interest groups and money influence politics following the Supreme Court's Citizens United decision. It defines different types of political spending, including direct contributions, soft money, PACs, 527 and 501(c) groups. The McCain-Feingold and Citizens United cases are summarized. Citizens United struck down limits on corporate political spending as a free speech issue. This opened the door to greater influence of super PACs and dark money groups in elections, though most money spent did not achieve the intended result. Political cartoons critique the influence of big money in politics.
The document summarizes key aspects of federal campaign finance law before and after the Citizens United Supreme Court decision. It discusses how Citizens United struck down limits on independent corporate spending in elections and led to a rise in spending by super PACs and 501c4 nonprofit groups. While Citizens United allowed for increased political spending, the document notes the dicta in the decision around freeing nonprofits from political activity limits could be used to mount further legal challenges but may not be successful in the near term.
This summarizes several significant Supreme Court cases since 2008 related to media law:
1) Garcetti v. Ceballos ruled that public employees are not protected by the First Amendment for speech made pursuant to their official job duties.
2) Federal Election Commission v. Wisconsin Right to Life ruled that the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act's limitations on political advertising were unconstitutional as applied to issue ads.
3) Citizens United v. FEC ruled that the government cannot ban political spending by corporations in candidate elections.
The survey data from 6 years of university library surveys found that the library is heavily used as a place and content provider, but that the value of these roles is diverging. While some services are strained, user discomfort is on the rise. Digging deeper showed interesting variations between colleges in how the library is used that could help assess current services and develop new ones. The survey was limited in scope but provides a starting point to discuss next steps and priorities.
This document outlines the guidelines for the final project in the MKT 420 course, which consists of an organizational SEO strategic plan report and presentation. Students will work in teams of two to create a 10-page report covering 10 sections, including objectives, SWOT analysis, competitor analysis, and specific tactic recommendations. They will also present the key tactics from the report in a 10-minute, 9-slide presentation. The report is worth 22 points and the presentation is worth 8 points (pass/fail). The project aims to provide a strategic roadmap for a business's search efforts by analyzing internal strengths/weaknesses and external opportunities/threats to identify the most appropriate search optimization tactics.
MKT 420 SEO Week 4 Steps for performing an SEO Audit including SERP page analysis, content analysis, review of code, measuring trustworthiness, evaluating potential keywords and content organization.
This document provides an agenda for an SEO planning discussion. It will cover SEO planning, strategy, and implementation. Specifically, it will discuss how SEO can provide visibility and website traffic. It will also address understanding customer intent, developing an SEO strategy based on business goals and target personas, competitive analysis, and setting objectives for metrics like traffic, sales, and lead generation.
High Impact Strategies for Enhancing Student Engagement Online and Hybrid Ma...Michael Germano
Strategies for impacting student success and satisfaction in online and hybrid classes via increasing social presence in digital learning environments.
This document discusses strategies for creating viral content using Berger's STEPPS framework. It examines each element of STEPPS - Social currency, Triggers, Emotion, Public, Practical value, and Storytelling. Examples are provided for how brands have incorporated these elements into successful viral campaigns. Students are then asked to envision a social media content campaign for an unknown product using the STEPPS model and storyboarding a video that incorporates each element. The final class will involve discussing fan media in relation to STEPPS and presenting content strategies and ideas.
This document provides instructions and reminders for an upcoming class. It mentions that there will be a quiz next week on chapters 7-20 from the Pulizzi text. The quiz must be taken with a team and is not open book. An editorial calendar with the team's content plan for the next 6 weeks is due next week. It also reminds students of upcoming individual assignments like a social media press release and blog posts that are due in the coming weeks. Students are asked to submit any missing fan page URLs, content purposes statements, or blog URLs by tomorrow.
This document discusses teaching and measuring creativity in social media marketing classrooms. It outlines preliminary research finding that marketing students see themselves as creative but creativity is not necessarily rewarded in academic settings. It also describes a social media marketing certificate program offered by California State University, Los Angeles. The document proposes models and exercises to help students develop and demonstrate their creative skills in social media strategy, content creation, and other areas.
This document discusses how big data and analytics are used in marketing to create value for customers. It explains that technological changes have led to the massive creation of digital data from various sources. Marketing analytics uses this customer data to better understand customers and predict their needs and wants in order to determine value. The document advocates that information professionals can play an important role as thought leaders in organizations that use data analytics to inform marketing strategies and processes. It suggests some steps for redefining one's role within an organization to contribute more to analytics and value creation efforts.
This document discusses several issues relating to international internet law, including governance and jurisdiction, international trademarks and copyright, global contracts and securities, privacy, and cybercrime. It notes that jurisdiction is complex across borders and examines preference for national enforcement. The EU is presented as a model for internet jurisdiction based on defendant's domicile. However, self-regulation is likely to be the norm globally due to the role of technology. International treaties and organizations address issues such as trademarks, copyright, and the flow of capital. However, differing privacy standards and cybercrimes present ongoing challenges for global internet governance.
This document discusses various types of cybercrime and challenges related to law enforcement. It covers topics like fraud, identity theft, privacy invasions, cyberbullying, commercial crimes, spam, challenges in investigating cybercrimes due to their complex nature and lack of jurisdictional boundaries, and several court case precedents related to cybercrime.
This document provides an overview of intellectual property topics including patents, trade secrets, and a case discussion. It summarizes that patents provide exclusivity for new and non-obvious inventions for 20 years, trade secrets protect valuable business information that companies have taken steps to keep secret, and both have advantages and limitations for protecting ideas and information compared to other IP rights.
This document provides an overview of intellectual property topics including patents, trade secrets, and related cases. It discusses what patents are, how they are obtained and enforced, and key requirements like novelty and non-obviousness. Business method patents and landmark cases are addressed. Trade secrets are defined as virtually any valuable business information that owners take reasonable steps to protect. Both patents and trade secrets are important forms of intellectual property protection.
This document outlines the agenda for a BUS 305 week 8 class which focuses on revising and editing text. It discusses that revising and editing is a multi-step process that involves revising the design, organization, content, and sentences of a document. Specifically, it provides acronyms to help guide revising the organization (OABC), content (the four C's), paragraphs (CLOUDS), and sentences (SPELL). It also mentions that students can earn extra credit points by revising a sample memo in teams of 4 or less.
This document provides an agenda and overview of key topics in trademark and copyright law, and how digital publishing and online connectivity have impacted these areas of intellectual property law. It discusses topics such as trademarks, copyright, infringement, fair use, secondary liability, domain names, the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, and notable cases related to trademarks and copyrights online. The document aims to examine the policy considerations behind laws and regulations regarding intellectual property in the digital age.
Michael Germano's presentation discusses social media best practices for new graduates. It recommends managing your online reputation by googling yourself, optimizing privacy settings, and only posting thoughtful content. It also suggests using social media to build your personal brand, demonstrate soft skills that employers value, and network to help with career hunting. The key message is that social media can be leveraged to promote your professional strengths and value to potential employers if used intelligently.
This document provides an agenda for a discussion on employment and technology law issues. It outlines several topics that will be covered, including employment agreements like non-competes and invention assignments, employment eligibility verification, employee rights as at-will workers, issues around unpaid interns and foreign workers, and post-employment obligations and agreements like non-disclosure agreements and separation agreements. It also briefly summarizes several relevant court cases on these topics like Intel v. Hamidi on former employee rights and duties and Mattel v. MGA on invention ownership.
Christian persecution in Islamic countries has intensified, with alarming incidents of violence, discrimination, and intolerance. This article highlights recent attacks in Nigeria, Pakistan, Egypt, Iran, and Iraq, exposing the multifaceted challenges faced by Christian communities. Despite the severity of these atrocities, the Western world's response remains muted due to political, economic, and social considerations. The urgent need for international intervention is underscored, emphasizing that without substantial support, the future of Christianity in these regions is at grave risk.
https://ecspe.org/the-rise-of-christian-persecution-in-islamic-countries/
18062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
#WenguiGuo#WashingtonFarm Guo Wengui Wolf son ambition exposed to open a far...rittaajmal71
Since fleeing to the United States in 2014, Guo Wengui has founded a number of projects in the United States, such as GTV Media Group, GTV private equity, farm loan project, G Club Operations Co., LTD., and Himalaya Exchange.
12062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
केरल उच्च न्यायालय ने 11 जून, 2024 को मंडला पूजा में भाग लेने की अनुमति मांगने वाली 10 वर्षीय लड़की की रिट याचिका को खारिज कर दिया, जिसमें सर्वोच्च न्यायालय की एक बड़ी पीठ के समक्ष इस मुद्दे की लंबित प्रकृति पर जोर दिया गया। यह आदेश न्यायमूर्ति अनिल के. नरेंद्रन और न्यायमूर्ति हरिशंकर वी. मेनन की खंडपीठ द्वारा पारित किया गया
ग्रेटर मुंबई के नगर आयुक्त को एक खुले पत्र में याचिका दायर कर 540 से अधिक मुंबईकरों ने सभी अवैध और अस्थिर होर्डिंग्स, साइनबोर्ड और इलेक्ट्रिक साइनेज को तत्काल हटाने और 13 मई, 2024 की शाम को घाटकोपर में अवैध होर्डिंग के गिरने की विनाशकारी घटना के बाद अपराधियों के खिलाफ सख्त कार्रवाई की मांग की है, जिसमें 17 लोगों की जान चली गई और कई निर्दोष लोग गंभीर रूप से घायल हो गए।
15062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
Federal Authorities Urge Vigilance Amid Bird Flu Outbreak | The Lifesciences ...The Lifesciences Magazine
Federal authorities have advised the public to remain vigilant but calm in response to the ongoing bird flu outbreak of highly pathogenic avian influenza, commonly known as bird flu.
16062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
Why We Chose ScyllaDB over DynamoDB for "User Watch Status"ScyllaDB
Yichen Wei and Adam Drennan share the architecture and technical requirements behind "user watch status" for a major global media streaming service, what that meant for their database, the pros and cons of the many options they considered for replacing DynamoDB, why they ultimately chose ScyllaDB, and their lessons learned so far.
लालू यादव की जीवनी LALU PRASAD YADAV BIOGRAPHYVoterMood
Discover the life and times of Lalu Prasad Yadav with a comprehensive biography in Hindi. Learn about his early days, rise in politics, controversies, and contribution.
Slide deck with charts from our Digital News Report 2024, the most comprehensive exploration of news consumption habits around the world, based on survey data from more than 95,000 respondents across 47 countries.
Shark Tank Jargon | Operational ProfitabilityTheUnitedIndian
Don't let fancy business words confuse you! This blog is your cheat sheet to understanding the Shark Tank Jargon. We'll translate all the confusing terms like "valuation" (how much the company is worth) and "royalty" (a fee for using someone's idea). You'll be swimming with the Sharks like a pro in no time!
13062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
2. What is the context of the
case?
‘Electioneering communication’ means
something specific. Where would you find the
definition to this?
Rule 441(b) organizations had restrictions
placed upon their electioneering
communication spending. What is a 441(b)
organization?
What was going on in our country at the time?
3. 2 U.S.C. 441(b)
What does this statute make unlawful?
Donations to campaigns
Limits the types of communications
corporations/unions can make during
elections (electioneering communications)
4. 11 CFR 100.29
Rules defining electioneering
communications
What is an electioneering
communication?
5. Precedent in effect
Bucky v. Valeo: Upheld federal election laws which set limits on
campaign contributions, but ruled that spending money to influence
elections is a form of constitutionally protected free speech; The laws in
question were passed by congress after the president Ford vetoed.
Austin v. Michigan State: When a State seeks to regulate corporate
political expenditures, it is not a limitation of the corporation’s First
Amendment constitutional rights if the state sets guidelines regarding
the origin of the funds.
McConnell v. FEC: Banning ‘soft-money’ (money not given directly to
candidates but instead to political parties) contributions are not
unconstitutional.
6. Who is the plaintiff?
Citizens United is a political advocacy
group
Google ‘citizens united’
What can you learn about them from
their website?
7. What happened?
During the 2008 election, a conservative non-profit organization named
"Citizens United" produced Hillary: The Movie, a documentary critical of
Hillary Clinton. Because of the political nature of the movie and the fact
that Citizens United intended to purchase airtime on a video on-
demand service on cable television, the movie was deemed an
"electioneering communication" by the Federal Election Commission
(FEC) and was therefore subject to the rules governing the production
of political ads, including limitations on who may fund them. Citizens
United sued in federal court to overturn the decision, lost and appealed
to the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court held two hearings on the case and its ruling
ultimately went far beyond what the plaintiffs had sought. The 5-4
decision permits corporations, unions and other special interests to
spend as much as they like to advocate the election or defeat of
political candidates. Laws that bar those interests from contributing
directly to candidates remain in place but the ruling lifted controls on
political giving that had been in place for decades.
8. What are the concerns?
Corruption in elections
Foreign involvement in elections
Unaccountability to voting electorate
Lack of fairness in electoral process
Democracy, where every vote matters,
no longer holds true
Invisible hand of corporations running
government
9. What about the decision?
What does it do?
What doesn’t it do?
Was this decision broad?
Could it have been made more narrow?
10. What rules must 441(b) orgs
follow?
What happened to the statute?
The regulations?
The previous cases on this topic?
Where do we go from here?
Can corporations donate to campaigns?
Can corporations donate anonymously?
11. Constitutional Implications
At its heart this is a first amendment/free
speech case
What does this case say about the first
amendment?
What does it say about money and its role in
speech rights?
What does it say about corporate speech?
Commercial speech? Political speech?