9/9 FRI 9:30 | Combating Corruption By Being Ethical 2
•Download as PPT, PDF•
1 like•257 views
Nancy Stroud The training session will focus on the new fourth section of the AICP Ethics Code. Included will be a dialogue about the ongoing ethical code efforts in Broward and Palm Beach counties to help combat the political corruption that has sent multiple city and county commissioners, and at least one certified planner, to prison. A must hear for all planners.
Report
Share
Report
Share
![Lessons from Recent Case Law ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]]()
Recommended
Maryland Ballot Guide 2012
Here are my thoughts on Question D:
While economic development is important, I have some concerns about approving such a large bond issue without more specifics on how the funds would be used. $15.8 million is a significant amount of money to borrow without a clear plan. Given Baltimore's fiscal challenges, taking on more debt should be done prudently.
I would have liked to see more details in the ballot language about proposed projects or initiatives so voters could make an informed decision. "Commercial/economic development" is very vague. How exactly would this benefit residents? What safeguards are in place to ensure accountability and that the funds are spent efficiently?
Without more transparency, I'm hesitant to just rubber stamp this bond
Corporate Personhood
The document summarizes the history of corporate personhood in the United States, including key Supreme Court cases. It discusses how the 1886 Santa Clara County ruling established that corporations have rights as persons, and how the 2010 Citizens United decision found that restricting corporate political spending violates free speech rights. The decision is controversial as critics argue unlimited corporate money in elections undermines democracy, while supporters see it as protecting free speech. Proposals to reverse the decision include a constitutional amendment or campaign finance reform.
Perry Op Ed
1) A lawsuit in California declared the state's ban on same-sex marriage unconstitutional, in an attempt to force a Supreme Court ruling that would legalize same-sex marriage nationwide. However, not all LGBT advocates supported this strategy, fearing an adverse Supreme Court decision.
2) While advocates want to win public support for same-sex marriage through ballot initiatives, they have so far been unsuccessful. Recent legislative victories in some states show progress, but achieving nationwide marriage equality through separate state laws is arduous.
3) The article argues that LGBT advocates must focus on strategies for winning ballot initiatives in order to achieve true social equality, as direct democracy will remain a key part of the political process for the foreseeable
Campaign finance
The correct answers are:
C) Russ Feingold and John McCain
A) Citizens united v. Federal Elections Commission
B) Buckley v. Valeo
C) Campaign Finance Reform Act
D) Hard money, soft money
B) Federal Election Commission
Political participation
Citizens have several options for political participation including voting, campaigning, running for office, lobbying, filing legal challenges, petitioning, demonstrating, and picketing. The document discusses each of these options in one or two paragraphs, providing definitions and examples. Campaigning involves planned events to show support or opposition, while running for office allows citizens to directly attempt to change laws by holding political office. Lobbying involves influencing legislators and policymakers, often done by interest groups that spend millions annually.
Voting Lobbying And Agencies
This document summarizes key aspects of voting, lobbying, and government agencies in the United States:
1) It lists various elected positions that citizens can vote for from the President down to local mayors and council members. It also discusses initiatives, referendums, and recalls that allow public voting on issues, laws, and removing officials from office.
2) It provides a brief history of voting rights expansions in the US from only white male property owners in the early 1820s to all races, women, 18-year-olds, and Native Americans at different points over time.
3) It notes that agencies like the FDA and EPA are created by Congress to make specific rules regarding issues like
Punishing Democracy -op-ed, BP
1) After voters in Denton, Texas approved a ban on fracking by 59-41%, the Texas General Land Office and Texas Oil and Gas Association sued to overturn the election results.
2) Similarly, when residents of Broadview Heights, Ohio and Mora County, New Mexico approved measures to ban fracking and protect community rights, energy companies sued in an attempt to reverse the election outcomes.
3) As communities across the country seek to ban fracking and protect themselves from corporate harms, lawsuits supported by state agencies and industry groups often work to deny people's democratic rights and nullify local self-governance on behalf of corporate privileges.
Recommended
Maryland Ballot Guide 2012
Here are my thoughts on Question D:
While economic development is important, I have some concerns about approving such a large bond issue without more specifics on how the funds would be used. $15.8 million is a significant amount of money to borrow without a clear plan. Given Baltimore's fiscal challenges, taking on more debt should be done prudently.
I would have liked to see more details in the ballot language about proposed projects or initiatives so voters could make an informed decision. "Commercial/economic development" is very vague. How exactly would this benefit residents? What safeguards are in place to ensure accountability and that the funds are spent efficiently?
Without more transparency, I'm hesitant to just rubber stamp this bond
Corporate Personhood
The document summarizes the history of corporate personhood in the United States, including key Supreme Court cases. It discusses how the 1886 Santa Clara County ruling established that corporations have rights as persons, and how the 2010 Citizens United decision found that restricting corporate political spending violates free speech rights. The decision is controversial as critics argue unlimited corporate money in elections undermines democracy, while supporters see it as protecting free speech. Proposals to reverse the decision include a constitutional amendment or campaign finance reform.
Perry Op Ed
1) A lawsuit in California declared the state's ban on same-sex marriage unconstitutional, in an attempt to force a Supreme Court ruling that would legalize same-sex marriage nationwide. However, not all LGBT advocates supported this strategy, fearing an adverse Supreme Court decision.
2) While advocates want to win public support for same-sex marriage through ballot initiatives, they have so far been unsuccessful. Recent legislative victories in some states show progress, but achieving nationwide marriage equality through separate state laws is arduous.
3) The article argues that LGBT advocates must focus on strategies for winning ballot initiatives in order to achieve true social equality, as direct democracy will remain a key part of the political process for the foreseeable
Campaign finance
The correct answers are:
C) Russ Feingold and John McCain
A) Citizens united v. Federal Elections Commission
B) Buckley v. Valeo
C) Campaign Finance Reform Act
D) Hard money, soft money
B) Federal Election Commission
Political participation
Citizens have several options for political participation including voting, campaigning, running for office, lobbying, filing legal challenges, petitioning, demonstrating, and picketing. The document discusses each of these options in one or two paragraphs, providing definitions and examples. Campaigning involves planned events to show support or opposition, while running for office allows citizens to directly attempt to change laws by holding political office. Lobbying involves influencing legislators and policymakers, often done by interest groups that spend millions annually.
Voting Lobbying And Agencies
This document summarizes key aspects of voting, lobbying, and government agencies in the United States:
1) It lists various elected positions that citizens can vote for from the President down to local mayors and council members. It also discusses initiatives, referendums, and recalls that allow public voting on issues, laws, and removing officials from office.
2) It provides a brief history of voting rights expansions in the US from only white male property owners in the early 1820s to all races, women, 18-year-olds, and Native Americans at different points over time.
3) It notes that agencies like the FDA and EPA are created by Congress to make specific rules regarding issues like
Punishing Democracy -op-ed, BP
1) After voters in Denton, Texas approved a ban on fracking by 59-41%, the Texas General Land Office and Texas Oil and Gas Association sued to overturn the election results.
2) Similarly, when residents of Broadview Heights, Ohio and Mora County, New Mexico approved measures to ban fracking and protect community rights, energy companies sued in an attempt to reverse the election outcomes.
3) As communities across the country seek to ban fracking and protect themselves from corporate harms, lawsuits supported by state agencies and industry groups often work to deny people's democratic rights and nullify local self-governance on behalf of corporate privileges.
140 FA 15 Courts
This document provides an overview of the U.S. legal system and Supreme Court. It discusses how laws are created through statutes and administrative rules. It also outlines the federal and state court structures, with trial courts handling original cases, appellate courts reviewing them, and state supreme courts serving as courts of last resort except for federal issues. The Supreme Court sits at the top and can choose which cases it will review through writs of certiorari. Nominating and confirming justices involves considering their qualifications, ideology, and political factors. Theories of Supreme Court decision-making include legal, attitudinal, and strategic models.
Courts
This document provides an overview of the US legal system and Supreme Court. It discusses how laws are created and categorized, the roles and jurisdictions of different courts, factors considered in Supreme Court nominations, models of Supreme Court decision making, and types of opinions issued. The key points are that laws aim to provide security and order in society, the Supreme Court has both original and appellate jurisdiction, and the President considers ideology and competence in nominations.
The Judiciary
This document provides an overview of the key concepts in political science and constitutional law. It discusses the purposes of law in providing security, predictability, and enforcing societal values. It also summarizes different types of laws and legal systems in the US, including substantive and procedural law. Key concepts in criminal and civil law are defined. The structure and jurisdiction of the US court system, from trial courts to the Supreme Court, are outlined. Factors in the Supreme Court nomination process and models of judicial decision-making are also summarized.
Courts
This document outlines key concepts about the US legal system and Supreme Court. It discusses the purposes of law in providing security, predictability, and enforcing societal values. It also defines different types of laws and crimes, the structure and jurisdiction of courts, and factors that influence Supreme Court nominations and decision-making. The Supreme Court has the power of judicial review to determine if laws are constitutional, establishing it as a check on the other branches of government.
Judicial Misconduct Complaint against Clay County Judge Roberts
Judicial Misconduct Complaint against Clay County Judge RobertsKentucky Equality Federation's - Jordan Palmer
This document summarizes a complaint filed with the Kentucky Judicial Conduct Commission against Clay County District Judge Allen B. Roberts. The complaint alleges that Judge Roberts showed prejudice and hostility toward the plaintiffs, Joshua Melton and James Feltner, and toward Jordan Palmer, the Secretary-General of the Kentucky Equality Federation, from the beginning of the trial. The complaint asserts that Judge Roberts ruled contrary to Kentucky law and in favor of his own personal beliefs, denying the plaintiffs a fair hearing. The Kentucky Equality Federation is requesting the Judicial Conduct Commission to review Judge Roberts' handling of the case.The U.S. Legal System
The U.S. legal system has its origins in medieval English common law and equity traditions. U.S. law comes from the Constitution, congressional statutes, administrative regulations, and modern case law from federal and state courts. The legal system is divided into civil and criminal law, with civil cases involving private disputes and criminal law governing offenses against the public. Remedies in civil cases include damages and equitable relief such as injunctions or restitution.
LEG 100 Business Law Quiz 2
The document discusses various legal concepts related to contracts, including browse-wrap agreements, past consideration exceptions, capacity to contract, and offer and acceptance. It provides scenarios and asks multiple choice questions about whether certain agreements would constitute valid contracts and the applicable contract formation rules and principles. The document appears to be a practice quiz or test on basic contract law concepts.
Redd e portfolio assignment #1 nmp665 core course
This document discusses key concepts regarding nonprofits and government including:
1) Nonprofits have legal requirements for incorporation at the state level and tax exemption status from the IRS. They must adhere to lobbying and reporting rules to maintain this status.
2) Nonprofits serve as advocates for the public interest but government funding and regulations can impact this role. Excessive lobbying or political activity could jeopardize their tax status.
3) Increased involvement with government in advocacy and services can affect nonprofits' operations and ability to fulfill their missions. CEOs must understand laws/regulations to determine optimal government involvement.
Canadian or American multinationals’ accountability in canada or the usa for ...
Should Canadian or American multinationals (MNCs) be held accountable in Canada or the USA for the human rights violations that they commit abroad? Why or why not? Illustrate your answer with examples.
The big NCs?
More case on casting a ballot, redistricting and race arrived at North Carolina's Supreme Court on Monday, as judges started choosing if two protected changes ought to be struck down on the grounds that legislators who put them on the polling form were chosen a debt of gratitude is in order for misshaped region limits.
https://uii.io/emariarr123
SOI_Toolkit
The document provides information about source of income discrimination in housing and resources for addressing it. It defines source of income discrimination as the refusal to rent to someone based on their use of housing vouchers, SSI, or other legal sources of income to pay rent. It advises readers who believe they have experienced such discrimination to document interactions, identify the problem, know local housing laws, and seek help by contacting landlords, fair housing organizations, or filing complaints with local agencies. Resources are provided for learning more about source of income protections and addressing discrimination.
Lobbying the Administration
This document discusses lobbying regulations under the Obama administration. It outlines three questions to determine if an activity constitutes lobbying, including if the communication is with a covered executive branch official and relates to policy formulation. It describes exceptions and key individuals considered covered officials. The document also summarizes increased restrictions under the Honest Leadership Act, including tougher sanctions, gift bans, and increased disclosure. It provides guidance on complying with Recovery Act and TARP fund lobbying policies. It stresses the importance of an effective compliance program to reduce legal risks and ensure lobbying activities sail through any audits.
Pol 140 04 american_legal_system_courts
This document provides an overview of the U.S. legal system and Supreme Court. It discusses how laws are created through statutes and administrative rules. It also explains the different levels and types of courts in both the federal and state systems. Additionally, it summarizes key Supreme Court cases like Marbury v. Madison that established the power of judicial review.
Top Selling Audiobooks Captured
Captured is a audiobook by U.S. Senator Sheldon Whitehouse that examines how corporate influence has infiltrated and disabled the U.S. government. The book draws on the senator's first-hand experiences to explain how corporate powers have exploited vulnerabilities in the system to threaten elected officials, stack the judiciary with business-friendly judges, capture regulatory agencies, and undermine public health and safety issues. Senator Whitehouse argues that corporate influence looks to undermine individual liberty and shows how citizens can regain control of their government.
Best Audiobooks Captured
Captured is a book by U.S. Senator Sheldon Whitehouse that examines how corporate influence has infiltrated and disabled the U.S. government. The book explains how corporate powers have exploited vulnerabilities in the system to threaten elected officials, stack the judiciary in a business-friendly way, capture regulatory agencies, undermine civil juries, and spread misinformation on issues like climate change. Senator Whitehouse draws on his experience in the Senate and legal scholarship to provide a comprehensive first-hand account of the avenues that have allowed corporate influence to grow and how citizens can work to restore balance.
Class 3 How Government Works
This document outlines an agenda for a class on how government works. It includes a discussion of current events, an activity asking what citizens need to know about government, and a discussion of amendments to the U.S. Constitution. It aims to educate students on the structure of government and the importance of civic participation and awareness.
Legal Ethics project 3 case 1
1. Peter James Commarano, an attorney, was charged with violating New Jersey Rules of Professional Conduct (RPC) 8.4(b) and 8.4(c) for accepting $25,000 in illicit cash campaign contributions from a cooperating witness in exchange for his future official assistance and influence in Hoboken government matters pertaining to the witness's real estate development projects.
2. The RPCs Commarano was charged with violating prohibit a lawyer from committing a criminal act that reflects adversely on the lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer, and from engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation.
3. The Disciplinary Review Board
Legal Memo #1 Paralegalism
Mr. McCarthy wants to advertise McCarthy & Nettles' legal services through billboards and web pages linked to legal product companies. The legal memorandum discusses the permissible and impermissible forms of legal advertising under the New Jersey Rules of Professional Conduct. It notes that advertisements cannot make false or misleading statements about a lawyer's services. Specifically, terms like "Best Lawyer" are inherently comparative and misleading to consumers. The rules also allow lawyers to advertise through various media as long as the ads are predominantly informational and do not use attention-getting techniques lacking relevance to selecting an attorney.
Courts
This document provides an overview of the U.S. legal system and Supreme Court. It defines different types of law and crimes in the U.S. system. It also outlines the structure and jurisdiction of state and federal courts. The nomination and confirmation process for Supreme Court justices is discussed, along with factors that influence a president's selection. Theories of Supreme Court decision-making are presented.
Federal election commission and citizens united
The Supreme Court case Citizens United v. FEC centered around a documentary film called "Hillary: The Movie" produced by Citizens United intended to influence voters against Hillary Clinton. The Federal Election Commission prevented the film's release on TV due to the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act banning corporate electioneering communications within 30 days of a primary. Citizens United sued and the Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that the BCRA restrictions violated free speech by limiting corporate independent political expenditures. The decision was controversial and opened the door for unlimited corporate spending on political campaigns.
Read Case 2-6 on page 59- Answer the question- -Should corporations ha.docx
The document discusses the Citizens United v. FEC Supreme Court case regarding campaign finance regulation. It provides background on the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act and Citizens United's challenge to the law over its documentary criticizing Hillary Clinton. The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that the law violated the First Amendment by restricting corporate independent political expenditures. While direct contributions to candidates can be limited, the government cannot ban corporations from seeking to persuade the public through means like TV ads. The document poses questions on whether the ruling applies to books, if corporations have constitutional rights, and if President Obama's criticism of the ruling was correct.
Court white paper
The document summarizes the Supreme Court ruling in Citizens United v. FEC and its implications for corporate political spending. Some key points:
- The ruling struck down longstanding bans on corporate spending on political campaigns, allowing unlimited spending on electioneering communications.
- It overturned precedents that had upheld restrictions on corporate spending to influence elections directly.
- There is now no limit on independent expenditures by corporations, though coordination with candidates is still banned.
- The decision enables foreign-owned corporations to spend on US elections for the first time.
- Proponents argue it protects free speech rights, while critics warn it will undermine democracy by increasing corporate influence.
More Related Content
What's hot
140 FA 15 Courts
This document provides an overview of the U.S. legal system and Supreme Court. It discusses how laws are created through statutes and administrative rules. It also outlines the federal and state court structures, with trial courts handling original cases, appellate courts reviewing them, and state supreme courts serving as courts of last resort except for federal issues. The Supreme Court sits at the top and can choose which cases it will review through writs of certiorari. Nominating and confirming justices involves considering their qualifications, ideology, and political factors. Theories of Supreme Court decision-making include legal, attitudinal, and strategic models.
Courts
This document provides an overview of the US legal system and Supreme Court. It discusses how laws are created and categorized, the roles and jurisdictions of different courts, factors considered in Supreme Court nominations, models of Supreme Court decision making, and types of opinions issued. The key points are that laws aim to provide security and order in society, the Supreme Court has both original and appellate jurisdiction, and the President considers ideology and competence in nominations.
The Judiciary
This document provides an overview of the key concepts in political science and constitutional law. It discusses the purposes of law in providing security, predictability, and enforcing societal values. It also summarizes different types of laws and legal systems in the US, including substantive and procedural law. Key concepts in criminal and civil law are defined. The structure and jurisdiction of the US court system, from trial courts to the Supreme Court, are outlined. Factors in the Supreme Court nomination process and models of judicial decision-making are also summarized.
Courts
This document outlines key concepts about the US legal system and Supreme Court. It discusses the purposes of law in providing security, predictability, and enforcing societal values. It also defines different types of laws and crimes, the structure and jurisdiction of courts, and factors that influence Supreme Court nominations and decision-making. The Supreme Court has the power of judicial review to determine if laws are constitutional, establishing it as a check on the other branches of government.
Judicial Misconduct Complaint against Clay County Judge Roberts
Judicial Misconduct Complaint against Clay County Judge RobertsKentucky Equality Federation's - Jordan Palmer
This document summarizes a complaint filed with the Kentucky Judicial Conduct Commission against Clay County District Judge Allen B. Roberts. The complaint alleges that Judge Roberts showed prejudice and hostility toward the plaintiffs, Joshua Melton and James Feltner, and toward Jordan Palmer, the Secretary-General of the Kentucky Equality Federation, from the beginning of the trial. The complaint asserts that Judge Roberts ruled contrary to Kentucky law and in favor of his own personal beliefs, denying the plaintiffs a fair hearing. The Kentucky Equality Federation is requesting the Judicial Conduct Commission to review Judge Roberts' handling of the case.The U.S. Legal System
The U.S. legal system has its origins in medieval English common law and equity traditions. U.S. law comes from the Constitution, congressional statutes, administrative regulations, and modern case law from federal and state courts. The legal system is divided into civil and criminal law, with civil cases involving private disputes and criminal law governing offenses against the public. Remedies in civil cases include damages and equitable relief such as injunctions or restitution.
LEG 100 Business Law Quiz 2
The document discusses various legal concepts related to contracts, including browse-wrap agreements, past consideration exceptions, capacity to contract, and offer and acceptance. It provides scenarios and asks multiple choice questions about whether certain agreements would constitute valid contracts and the applicable contract formation rules and principles. The document appears to be a practice quiz or test on basic contract law concepts.
Redd e portfolio assignment #1 nmp665 core course
This document discusses key concepts regarding nonprofits and government including:
1) Nonprofits have legal requirements for incorporation at the state level and tax exemption status from the IRS. They must adhere to lobbying and reporting rules to maintain this status.
2) Nonprofits serve as advocates for the public interest but government funding and regulations can impact this role. Excessive lobbying or political activity could jeopardize their tax status.
3) Increased involvement with government in advocacy and services can affect nonprofits' operations and ability to fulfill their missions. CEOs must understand laws/regulations to determine optimal government involvement.
Canadian or American multinationals’ accountability in canada or the usa for ...
Should Canadian or American multinationals (MNCs) be held accountable in Canada or the USA for the human rights violations that they commit abroad? Why or why not? Illustrate your answer with examples.
The big NCs?
More case on casting a ballot, redistricting and race arrived at North Carolina's Supreme Court on Monday, as judges started choosing if two protected changes ought to be struck down on the grounds that legislators who put them on the polling form were chosen a debt of gratitude is in order for misshaped region limits.
https://uii.io/emariarr123
SOI_Toolkit
The document provides information about source of income discrimination in housing and resources for addressing it. It defines source of income discrimination as the refusal to rent to someone based on their use of housing vouchers, SSI, or other legal sources of income to pay rent. It advises readers who believe they have experienced such discrimination to document interactions, identify the problem, know local housing laws, and seek help by contacting landlords, fair housing organizations, or filing complaints with local agencies. Resources are provided for learning more about source of income protections and addressing discrimination.
Lobbying the Administration
This document discusses lobbying regulations under the Obama administration. It outlines three questions to determine if an activity constitutes lobbying, including if the communication is with a covered executive branch official and relates to policy formulation. It describes exceptions and key individuals considered covered officials. The document also summarizes increased restrictions under the Honest Leadership Act, including tougher sanctions, gift bans, and increased disclosure. It provides guidance on complying with Recovery Act and TARP fund lobbying policies. It stresses the importance of an effective compliance program to reduce legal risks and ensure lobbying activities sail through any audits.
Pol 140 04 american_legal_system_courts
This document provides an overview of the U.S. legal system and Supreme Court. It discusses how laws are created through statutes and administrative rules. It also explains the different levels and types of courts in both the federal and state systems. Additionally, it summarizes key Supreme Court cases like Marbury v. Madison that established the power of judicial review.
Top Selling Audiobooks Captured
Captured is a audiobook by U.S. Senator Sheldon Whitehouse that examines how corporate influence has infiltrated and disabled the U.S. government. The book draws on the senator's first-hand experiences to explain how corporate powers have exploited vulnerabilities in the system to threaten elected officials, stack the judiciary with business-friendly judges, capture regulatory agencies, and undermine public health and safety issues. Senator Whitehouse argues that corporate influence looks to undermine individual liberty and shows how citizens can regain control of their government.
Best Audiobooks Captured
Captured is a book by U.S. Senator Sheldon Whitehouse that examines how corporate influence has infiltrated and disabled the U.S. government. The book explains how corporate powers have exploited vulnerabilities in the system to threaten elected officials, stack the judiciary in a business-friendly way, capture regulatory agencies, undermine civil juries, and spread misinformation on issues like climate change. Senator Whitehouse draws on his experience in the Senate and legal scholarship to provide a comprehensive first-hand account of the avenues that have allowed corporate influence to grow and how citizens can work to restore balance.
Class 3 How Government Works
This document outlines an agenda for a class on how government works. It includes a discussion of current events, an activity asking what citizens need to know about government, and a discussion of amendments to the U.S. Constitution. It aims to educate students on the structure of government and the importance of civic participation and awareness.
Legal Ethics project 3 case 1
1. Peter James Commarano, an attorney, was charged with violating New Jersey Rules of Professional Conduct (RPC) 8.4(b) and 8.4(c) for accepting $25,000 in illicit cash campaign contributions from a cooperating witness in exchange for his future official assistance and influence in Hoboken government matters pertaining to the witness's real estate development projects.
2. The RPCs Commarano was charged with violating prohibit a lawyer from committing a criminal act that reflects adversely on the lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer, and from engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation.
3. The Disciplinary Review Board
Legal Memo #1 Paralegalism
Mr. McCarthy wants to advertise McCarthy & Nettles' legal services through billboards and web pages linked to legal product companies. The legal memorandum discusses the permissible and impermissible forms of legal advertising under the New Jersey Rules of Professional Conduct. It notes that advertisements cannot make false or misleading statements about a lawyer's services. Specifically, terms like "Best Lawyer" are inherently comparative and misleading to consumers. The rules also allow lawyers to advertise through various media as long as the ads are predominantly informational and do not use attention-getting techniques lacking relevance to selecting an attorney.
Courts
This document provides an overview of the U.S. legal system and Supreme Court. It defines different types of law and crimes in the U.S. system. It also outlines the structure and jurisdiction of state and federal courts. The nomination and confirmation process for Supreme Court justices is discussed, along with factors that influence a president's selection. Theories of Supreme Court decision-making are presented.
What's hot (19)
Judicial Misconduct Complaint against Clay County Judge Roberts
Judicial Misconduct Complaint against Clay County Judge Roberts
Canadian or American multinationals’ accountability in canada or the usa for ...
Canadian or American multinationals’ accountability in canada or the usa for ...
Similar to 9/9 FRI 9:30 | Combating Corruption By Being Ethical 2
Federal election commission and citizens united
The Supreme Court case Citizens United v. FEC centered around a documentary film called "Hillary: The Movie" produced by Citizens United intended to influence voters against Hillary Clinton. The Federal Election Commission prevented the film's release on TV due to the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act banning corporate electioneering communications within 30 days of a primary. Citizens United sued and the Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that the BCRA restrictions violated free speech by limiting corporate independent political expenditures. The decision was controversial and opened the door for unlimited corporate spending on political campaigns.
Read Case 2-6 on page 59- Answer the question- -Should corporations ha.docx
The document discusses the Citizens United v. FEC Supreme Court case regarding campaign finance regulation. It provides background on the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act and Citizens United's challenge to the law over its documentary criticizing Hillary Clinton. The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that the law violated the First Amendment by restricting corporate independent political expenditures. While direct contributions to candidates can be limited, the government cannot ban corporations from seeking to persuade the public through means like TV ads. The document poses questions on whether the ruling applies to books, if corporations have constitutional rights, and if President Obama's criticism of the ruling was correct.
Court white paper
The document summarizes the Supreme Court ruling in Citizens United v. FEC and its implications for corporate political spending. Some key points:
- The ruling struck down longstanding bans on corporate spending on political campaigns, allowing unlimited spending on electioneering communications.
- It overturned precedents that had upheld restrictions on corporate spending to influence elections directly.
- There is now no limit on independent expenditures by corporations, though coordination with candidates is still banned.
- The decision enables foreign-owned corporations to spend on US elections for the first time.
- Proponents argue it protects free speech rights, while critics warn it will undermine democracy by increasing corporate influence.
Court white paper
The document summarizes the Supreme Court ruling in Citizens United v. FEC and its implications for corporate political spending. Some key points:
- The ruling struck down longstanding bans on corporate spending on political campaigns, allowing unlimited spending on electioneering communications.
- It overturned precedents that had upheld restrictions on corporate spending to influence elections directly.
- There is now no limit on independent expenditures by corporations, though coordination with candidates is still banned.
- The decision enables foreign-owned corporations to spend on US elections for the first time.
- Proponents argue it protects free speech rights, while critics warn it will undermine democracy by increasing corporate influence.
American Companies Unlimited
What Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission Means for Companies’ Political Campaign Spending.
Corporate Money In Politics
This document summarizes the history of corporate money in politics and campaign finance law in the United States. It discusses key Supreme Court rulings like Buckley v. Valeo, Bellotti, Austin, McConnell, Citizens United, and Hobby Lobby that have expanded corporate political speech rights and loosened campaign finance regulations. The Powell Memorandum of 1971 encouraged corporations to engage more actively in politics to influence regulations. Over time, the Court has increasingly equated corporate political spending with free speech and overturned restrictions on direct corporate donations to politicians.
Citizens United v. Federal Election CommissionFor more than 100 .docx
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission
For more than 100 years Congress and the Supreme Court carefully fashioned laws to check corporate power in elections. At first, the restraints were loose, but over the years they tightened. There were de- bates and a few dissents, but the nation never hesi- tated in its direction—until 2010 when five justices of the Supreme Court decided to reverse course. This is the story of their decision. It begins in the nation’s youth.
CONGRESS PROTECTS
ELECTIONS
In the American philosophy of self-government, free elections are an indispensable bulwark against tyranny. The founders believed all citizens should have the right to vote, that their votes should count equally, and that a majority should prevail. The rules in the Constitution bound the young nation to these ideals. The Founding Fathers also believed that if citizens were to vote wisely, they needed full, open debate on candidates and issues. The central purpose of the First Amendment, which directs that “Congress shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech,” is to protect this debate.
In the early years of the republic the practice largely accorded with the ideal. The first challenge came right after the Civil War when violence and intimidation kept freed slaves from the polls. Con- gress passed two Enforcement Acts in 1870 and 1871 to protect the freed slaves’ right to vote and these were the first election laws. The Supreme Court eventually upheld “the [constitutional] power of [C]ongress to make such provisions as are necessary to secure the fair and honest conduct of an election.”1
A second challenge to “fair and honest conduct” in elections arose when industrial growth created pools of great wealth. By the 1870s railroads were already spending heavily for political favors. In 1873 Jay Gould, owner of the Erie Railroad, explained his businesslike approach to elections.
It was the custom when men received nominations to come to me for contributions, and I made them and considered them good paying dividends for the company; in a republican district I was a strong re- publican, in a democratic district I was democratic, and in doubtful districts I was doubtful; in politics
I was an Erie railroad man every time.2
As time passed, the amounts of business money in elections grew. So did public perception of corrup- tion, real and imagined. Standard Oil is reported to have given a check for $250,000 (about $6.4 million in current dollars) to reelect McKinley in 1900. In 1905 an investigation of New York insurance companies inflamed the nation. It revealed they had spent hundreds of thousands of dollars electing state and national politicians. A prominent Republican boss, when asked if these contributions bought favors, re- plied: “That’s naturally what would be involved.”3 The investigation also revealed a $50,000 ($1.2 mil- lion in today’s dollars) donation from New York Life to President Theodore Roosevelt in 1904. Roosevelt, who had s.
SCOTUS / Media Law Update: 2008-2011
This summarizes several significant Supreme Court cases since 2008 related to media law:
1) Garcetti v. Ceballos ruled that public employees are not protected by the First Amendment for speech made pursuant to their official job duties.
2) Federal Election Commission v. Wisconsin Right to Life ruled that the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act's limitations on political advertising were unconstitutional as applied to issue ads.
3) Citizens United v. FEC ruled that the government cannot ban political spending by corporations in candidate elections.
publicly financed campaigns
This document provides background on publicly financed political campaigns in the United States. It discusses the history of campaign finance laws and Supreme Court cases that have impacted this issue. Specifically, it outlines the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 which established disclosure requirements and contribution limits, and how the 1976 Supreme Court case Buckley v. Valeo challenged aspects of this act and established that political donations are a form of protected political speech. The document argues that while limiting donations is no longer viable, incentivizing small donations from regular citizens could help counter large donations from corporations and wealthy donors.
State Lobbying
The document provides an overview of a seminar on effective state government lobbying. It discusses:
1) The seminar covers methods, strategies, and skills for effective lobbying at the state level in legislatures and executive agencies.
2) Key aspects of effective legislative lobbying covered include assessing political strength, building infrastructure, crafting bills, working with staff, using procedures, gaining support, and motivating lawmakers.
3) Effective executive agency lobbying focuses on rulemaking, appeals processes, and technical/expert aspects of influencing agency decisions.
Citizens United Is Unconstitutional - Restore Democracy to The People
Visit http://americansforamendment.org/ for more information.
We are not affiliated with MTA, but, this quote is most applicable from https://movetoamend.org/voters-both-parties-object-supreme-court-activism "We’re fed up with the influence of Big Money in our political system. “If anything can unite Americans across party and ideological lines, it should be the arrogant and unprecedented Supreme Court ruling [Citizens United] that corporations [including unions, associations, and other entities] are “persons” with all the protections and rights of the Constitution. In a case trumped up by the court itself, five activist judges reversed 100 years of precedent to allow unlimited, special-interest money to be spent in our local, state and federal elections. Corporations [and other entities] are now free to spend unlimited money on behalf of a candidate they favor, or against one they wish to silence. No grassroots organization will ever be likely to raise enough money for their candidate to compete on a level playing field. Put simply in a New York Times headline, the story comes down to, “Lobbies’ New Power: Cross Us and Our Cash Will Bury You.” As moderate Washington Post columnist E.J. Dionne, Jr. wrote, “The only proper response to this distortion of our political system by ideologically driven justices is a popular revolt.”The choice is simple. Will government answer to the people, or serve special interests? Will elections be an opportunity for the people to speak powerfully to their government, or will elections become competitions among corporate powers, unions and giant foundations to serve their own interests? And what if corporate interests are tied to an unfriendly foreign power? It is difficult to imagine how our democracy would be strengthened by a large infusion of cash into our political process from such governments as Russia, China or Saudi Arabia. Most outrage at this attack on democracy focuses on national politics. However, the ruling also nullifies protections against corporate domination of elections in the 23 states, including Colorado, that model their laws on the federal Constitution.”
California Politics (Summer06)
The document discusses California's system of direct democracy through initiatives, referendums, and recalls. It provides background on their origins in the early 20th century as a way for citizens to have more direct control over laws and policies. There are arguments that they empower ordinary citizens but also that they are tools that mostly benefit wealthy individuals and organizations. While initiatives allow for progressive laws, some that passed received major funding from conservative groups and targeted immigrant and minority rights. Critics argue citizens may lack expertise to make complex decisions and be swayed by emotions over long-term impacts. Many initiatives are challenged in courts with around half being invalidated.
The Pros And Cons Of Constitutional Courts
The document discusses judicial review in India. It begins by defining judicial review as the power of courts to review laws and actions of the government to determine if they are constitutional. It then discusses the origins of judicial review in India, noting it is modeled after the US system. Several provisions in the Indian constitution give courts this power of judicial review. The power allows courts to strike down unconstitutional laws and acts as a check on the other branches of government.
Reaction to the Supreme Court’s Campaign Finance Decision
The Supreme Court struck down overall limits on campaign contributions, changing the role of money in politics. Reaction was mixed, with Republicans supporting the decision as a free speech issue, while Democrats warned it would increase the influence of wealthy donors. Critics said it could lead to evasion of individual contribution limits and a "pay-to-play" system in Washington.
Media law update
This slideshow updates important Supreme Court cases involving media law that have occurred since our media law textbook was published in 2008.
Allahabad hc order dated nov 2
This writ petition was filed by two women, Sultana Mirza and another, who are in a same-sex live-in relationship. They claim they face resistance and threats from family and society due to their sexual orientation. They sought a court order protecting them from coercion by authorities and interference in their relationship. The court cited the 2018 Navtej Singh Johar Supreme Court ruling that recognized same-sex relationships and sexual orientation as a fundamental right. It directed the local police superintendent to provide the petitioners protection from harassment if they request it, in line with constitutional protections of dignity, liberty and equality. The writ petition was finally disposed of with this observation.
ACLU of Delaware Summer 2017 Newsletter
I assigned articles, wrote a few articles, found/created graphics and performed all the layout on the quarterly ACLU-DE newsletter.
Snickars Voice v Vote Sept 2015
This dissertation examines the tension between political voice and vote in U.S. liberal democracy as reflected in Supreme Court jurisprudence on election law. It argues that the Court's Citizens United decision, which struck down limits on corporate political spending, elevated the corporate voice over the individual vote. This decision was preceded by two stages - first, the Court briefly elevated the power of the vote in the 1960s, then raised the power of political expression over the vote in Buckley v. Valeo and Citizens United. The dissertation will analyze how the Court arrived at prioritizing voice over vote by exploring the complex relationship between liberty and equality in American liberalism and the culture of legalism that privileges liberty. It will also consider the
National Defense Authorization Act 2012 Article Assignment Nullification by S...
Article Assignment; Students will read the article on nullification and how South Carolina is pushing back against the NDAA 2012 using the 10th Amendment.
Similar to 9/9 FRI 9:30 | Combating Corruption By Being Ethical 2 (19)
Read Case 2-6 on page 59- Answer the question- -Should corporations ha.docx
Read Case 2-6 on page 59- Answer the question- -Should corporations ha.docx
Citizens United v. Federal Election CommissionFor more than 100 .docx
Citizens United v. Federal Election CommissionFor more than 100 .docx
Citizens United Is Unconstitutional - Restore Democracy to The People
Citizens United Is Unconstitutional - Restore Democracy to The People
Reaction to the Supreme Court’s Campaign Finance Decision
Reaction to the Supreme Court’s Campaign Finance Decision
National Defense Authorization Act 2012 Article Assignment Nullification by S...
National Defense Authorization Act 2012 Article Assignment Nullification by S...
More from APA Florida
Microsoft word margaritaville brings excitement and renovations to hollywoo...
The Jimmy Buffett-themed Margaritaville Hollywood Beach Resort is expected to bring renovations and excitement to Hollywood beach when it opens in August 2014. The $130 million resort is spurring improvements among local businesses hoping to attract overflow from the 349-room property's restaurants, bars, and attractions. It is predicted that the resort will generate millions in annual tax revenue while its guests spend around $90 million per year in the local area. Local business owners see the resort as transforming Hollywood beach and helping the area compete with more successful beaches like Fort Lauderdale.
Planning in the courts by Nancy Stroud, James White & David Theriaque
This document summarizes two land use cases: St. John's River Water Management District v. Koontz, where the Florida Supreme Court ruled that an agency's denial of a permit based on improper monetary conditions could result in a taking; and Herrin v. Volusia County, where an administrative judge reviewed a comprehensive plan amendment for a large development under new statutory standards. It also briefly discusses Martin County Conservation Alliance v. Martin County, where an appeals court sanctioned organizations for filing an appeal without standing.
Sector planning presentation by Jim Sellen, Mike McDaniel, David Powell & Dav...
The document discusses sector planning in Florida. Key points include:
- Sector planning allows for long-term planning over large geographic areas of 15,000 acres or more and a planning period of 20-50 years.
- The process includes adopting a long-term master plan and more detailed specific area plans.
- Examples are provided of existing sector plans in Florida, including their size, projected population and development.
- Reasons why some large landowners may be interested in sector planning include its long-term planning horizon and ability to continue agricultural uses in the short-term. However, the process also has challenges such as public scrutiny and potential impacts to farming operations.
Statewide Planning on the Regional Scale by Tim Chapin, Brian Teeple, Howard ...
- The Florida Constitution requires the development of a long-range state planning document that includes projections of future state needs and resources.
- The governor must recommend revisions to this document to the legislature biennially. All state departments and agencies must also develop their own planning documents consistent with the long-range state planning document.
- These planning documents must identify statewide strategic goals and objectives and include a prioritized list of planned expenditures that could be reduced in the event of revenue shortfalls. The documents remain subject to review and revision by the legislature.
Florida: An Economic Overview by Amy Baker
- Florida's economy grew 1.4% in 2010 after declining for two years, but personal income fell in Q3 2011 for the first time since 2009. Unemployment remained high at 9.9% in December 2011.
- While housing sales and permits have increased year-over-year, foreclosure rates remain high and home prices are flat. Population growth is expected to increase to around 1.1% by 2030, fueling economic growth.
- The recovery has been slow as the state has yet to regain the 779,700 jobs lost. Challenges remain such as high unemployment, tight credit conditions, and problems in the Eurozone economy.
9/9 FRI 09:30 | Financing Public Waterfront Access - Jupiter
Brenda Arnold
Mayor Karen Golonka
Emily O'Mahoney
Thomas Baird
Examine how Jupiter promotes public access and uses along the waterfront. See how public-private partnerships can create
places for public use. Discussion on how the Community Redevelopment Agency, Community Development Districts, zoning
regulations, grants, EB-5 financing and the Town's public land purchases are leveraged to create the vision along the Intracoastal Waterway and the Jupiter Inlet. The session will illustrate the financing and planning methods that were used, and provides real world experiences and guidance to maintaining public access
and uses, instead of strictly private waterfront developments.
9/9 FRI 09:30 | Protecting Florida's Aviation Assets
Clara Bennett
Thomas Cooney
Dan Bartholomew
Jon Sewll
Artie White
The panel discussion will focus on the importance of protecting aviation facilities and land assets through planning techniques and enforcing existing laws. The session will include an overview
of the economic benefit aviation brings to Florida and resources available to protect these assets, followed by a panel discussion with a local airport representative and government official to discuss how these techniques have been implemented in their areas. This session is appropriate for planning commissioners, elected officials, staff planners, zoning officials and others involved with land use and zoning responsibilities in areas near
commercial and general aviation airports.
9/9 FRI 16:15 | Creating Action Oriented Meetings
Robert Hunter
Bruce Cury
The session will be designed to provide planners and Planning Commissioners with valuable tools to create effective meetings that result in positive actions. In these lean budget times, using resources and time effectively is critical. Meetings are the planner’s primary vehicle for communicating and getting input from the public. Effective public participation in our planning processes is key. This session will provide perspectives on achieving effective public input in public hearings and running Planning Commission meetings that result in positive changes
for the community. Techniques for dealing with challenging individuals, reaching consensus, handling conflicts, politics and
keeping meetings on task will be discussed.
9/8 THUR 10:45 | Lessons Learned -Environmental Planning 1
Dr. Jennifer Languell
The land planning process today is heavily regulated and complex. This session highlighted real life examples from three senior level executives who drew upon past experiences
and demonstrated how they turned adversity into opportunity by employing creative and environmentally sound land planning
techniques. The presentation provided the audience with environmental solutions that can be successfully applied to their own projects. The panel presented their challenges, reviewed
the methodology and application of their solutions and discussed lessons learned throughout the process.
APA Florida 2011 Sponsors
This document lists different levels of sponsors - Platinum, Gold, Silver, and Bronze - that support an annual event. It thanks all sponsors for their contributions and support.
9/10 SAT 8:30 | Land Use Law Update - What's New
Marcie Oppenheimer Nolan
Nancy Stroud
James E. White
Johanna M. Lundgren
This session focused on the recent state and federal cases impacting daily activities of planners, focusing on “hot button” land uses which involve layers of local, state and federal regulations,
and emphasizing the needs of local government planners in understanding the legal constraints on the treatment of certain land uses. Planners also learned best practices for addressing locally unwanted land uses (“LULUs”) such as “pain clinics”, halfway houses and rehabilitation centers and “big box” commercial uses that pose significant compatibility issues and challenges
for local governments.
9/10 SAT 8:30 | Parking as a Smart Growth Strategy
This document summarizes a study on the impact of parking supply and demand management strategies in the Miami and Fort Lauderdale central business districts. The study found that (1) expanding parking supply does not solve congestion issues, (2) managing parking pricing and availability can reduce traffic by decreasing circling for parking and reflecting true travel costs, and (3) parking policy should support congestion management and community goals like economic development, quality of life, and sustainability. The document outlines the study methodology, analysis of parking supply and demand, the relationship between parking and transit performance, parking revenue options, land use policy recommendations, and topics for verification with local stakeholders.
9/10 SAT 10:00 | Keynote: John Landis
Planning as a discipline pays inadequate attention to evaluating its success and failures. As a result, planning “successes” often get defined by others, usually as a lack of success. John Landis, Crossways Professor and Department Chair of City and Regional Planning at the University of Pennsylvania, will provide insight and case studies on planning success stories, as well as provide
advice on how to institutionalize success into our efforts. Professor Landis teaches courses in urban economics, property development, land use planning, and green development, among
others. His research interests span a variety of urban development topics including growth management, infill housing, and the geography of urban growth. Professor Landis is currently
completing a National Science Foundation–funded project to model, forecast, and develop alternative spatial scenarios of U.S. population and employment patterns and their impacts on
travel demand, habitat loss, and water use through 2050.
9/10 SAT 8:30 | Planning for Walkable Multimodal Neighborhoods
Renea Vincent
Whit Blanton
Scott Swearengen
Shilpa Mehta
The City of Tarpon Springs seeks to revitalize its downtown core areas and encourage redevelopment for a vibrant, thriving, destination with a wide range of travel options. The principal ways proving access to the City's urban neighborhoods are constrained and cannot be widened to meet existing or future demand generated by redevelopment. In addition, existing future land use and zoning regulations are out of touch with the area's traditional urban form.
9/10 SAT 8:30 | Can Planners Create Jobs? - Planning & Econ. Dev. 4
Charles Pattison
As of the Spring of 2011 unemployment in Florida is hovering around 12%. Many people are out of work but what can planners do to help spur the state’s economy? Even Governor Scott has
placed economic development as the foundation of his governorship with his 777 Plan. This panel will consider some of the ways that planners can help in economic development efforts. The panel will explore the varied ways planning is intersecting
economic development in Florida in the private sector, in the environmental community and on the state and local levels.
9/9 FRI 4:15 | Rethinking Florida 2060
Melina Duggal
Charles G. Pattison
Debra Dremann
Frances Marino
The 2060 Plan prepared by the 1000 Friends of Florida presented an ominous scenario of sprawling development in Florida. Since
then, new policies at the state and local level, changes in the availability of capital both for development and conservation, and
demographic and economic trends have likely altered Florida’s future outlook. Is 2060 just delayed, or have development patterns
changed forever? A panel of experts will discuss likely growth scenarios, define ways to capitalize on alternative development trends and present ideas on conservation, planning, financing,
and approaches to development that can be successful in these economic times and the future.
9/9 FRI 4:15 | Reimaging Communities
Daniel Kildee
Like many states around the country, the recent economic and housing crisis took a toll on Florida’s communities. The increase in vacant, abandoned, and foreclosed properties has deteriorated neighborhoods, strained local governments, and stunted development.
The first part of this session will explore the challenges facing shrinking cities and how creative planning concepts can foster regionalism and intergovernmental collaboration. The
second part of this session will highlight systemic changes that can positively affect how communities plan, such as reforms to the property tax foreclosure, code enforcement, and mortgage
foreclosure systems.
9/9 FRI 4:15 | Pay-to-Play: Paying for Growth
Tyson Smith
Dr. Robert Burchell
The presenters will provide commentary on the shift from broadbased funding mechanisms (like property taxes) to user fees and special assessments (private or quasi-private mechanisms) as the principal means of funding new infrastructure. This shiftslow economic recovery and an anti-tax and anti-government
resurgence. Planners will be facing an environment where infrastructure increasingly is provided by either private parties (think
development agreements) or subsets of the jurisdiction who can afford it (think special assessments). This session discusses
what this trend means for planners and for society.
9/9 Friday 4:15 creating action oriented meetings
The document provides guidance on creating action-oriented meetings and transitioning to a paperless process. It recommends delivering agenda items and packets via website, flash-drive, netbook, or hard copy by request as part of the transition to paperless. It also outlines five rules of persuasive communication: be goal oriented, persuade using others' self-interest, make others feel important, do nothing to injure, and be brief.
9/9 FRI 4:15 | Avon Park AFR: Joint Land Use Study 3
Tricia Martin
Incompatible growth near military facilities can threaten our national defense. Learn what types of development can conflict with military training. Explore the challenges of conducting multi-jurisdictional studies to promote appropriate land uses, around military facilities. Panelists will discuss lessons learned during the course of a Joint Land Use Study (JLUS) of four counties
and three cities for the Avon Park Air Force Range, and close coordination with conservation groups. Strategies to develop support from the community and public officials for measures such as transfer of development rights to buffer the public from
the impacts of necessary military activities will be discussed.
More from APA Florida (20)
Microsoft word margaritaville brings excitement and renovations to hollywoo...
Microsoft word margaritaville brings excitement and renovations to hollywoo...
Planning in the courts by Nancy Stroud, James White & David Theriaque
Planning in the courts by Nancy Stroud, James White & David Theriaque
Sector planning presentation by Jim Sellen, Mike McDaniel, David Powell & Dav...
Sector planning presentation by Jim Sellen, Mike McDaniel, David Powell & Dav...
Statewide Planning on the Regional Scale by Tim Chapin, Brian Teeple, Howard ...
Statewide Planning on the Regional Scale by Tim Chapin, Brian Teeple, Howard ...
9/9 FRI 09:30 | Financing Public Waterfront Access - Jupiter
9/9 FRI 09:30 | Financing Public Waterfront Access - Jupiter
9/9 FRI 09:30 | Protecting Florida's Aviation Assets
9/9 FRI 09:30 | Protecting Florida's Aviation Assets
9/8 THUR 10:45 | Lessons Learned -Environmental Planning 1
9/8 THUR 10:45 | Lessons Learned -Environmental Planning 1
9/10 SAT 8:30 | Parking as a Smart Growth Strategy
9/10 SAT 8:30 | Parking as a Smart Growth Strategy
9/10 SAT 8:30 | Planning for Walkable Multimodal Neighborhoods
9/10 SAT 8:30 | Planning for Walkable Multimodal Neighborhoods
9/10 SAT 8:30 | Can Planners Create Jobs? - Planning & Econ. Dev. 4
9/10 SAT 8:30 | Can Planners Create Jobs? - Planning & Econ. Dev. 4
9/9 FRI 4:15 | Avon Park AFR: Joint Land Use Study 3
9/9 FRI 4:15 | Avon Park AFR: Joint Land Use Study 3
Recently uploaded
13062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
A draft Ukraine-Russia treaty from April 2022
A draft Ukraine-Russia treaty from April 2022, published here in full for the first time.
Howard Fineman, Veteran Political Journalist and TV Pundit, Dies at 75
Howard Fineman, Veteran Political Journalist and TV Pundit, Dies at 75LUMINATIVE MEDIA/PROJECT COUNSEL MEDIA GROUP
From his beginnings with a daily newspaper, he moved easily through Newsweek magazine to cable news and, later, to the frontiers of online journalism.Essential Tools for Modern PR Business .pptx
Discover the essential tools and strategies for modern PR business success. Learn how to craft compelling news releases, leverage press release sites and news wires, stay updated with PR news, and integrate effective PR practices to enhance your brand's visibility and credibility. Elevate your PR efforts with our comprehensive guide.
在线办理(latrobe毕业证书)拉筹伯大学毕业证Offer一模一样
学校原件一模一样【微信：741003700 】《(latrobe毕业证书)拉筹伯大学毕业证》【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
Youngest c m in India- Pema Khandu Biography
Pema Khandu, born on August 21, 1979, is an Indian politician and the Chief Minister of Arunachal Pradesh. He is the son of former Chief Minister of Arunachal Pradesh, Dorjee Khandu. Pema Khandu assumed office as the Chief Minister in July 2016, making him one of the youngest Chief Ministers in India at that time.
Snigdha-Sreenath-Minor-v-Travancore-Devaswom-Board-WPCNO-39847-OF-2023-2024-L...
केरल उच्च न्यायालय ने 11 जून, 2024 को मंडला पूजा में भाग लेने की अनुमति मांगने वाली 10 वर्षीय लड़की की रिट याचिका को खारिज कर दिया, जिसमें सर्वोच्च न्यायालय की एक बड़ी पीठ के समक्ष इस मुद्दे की लंबित प्रकृति पर जोर दिया गया। यह आदेश न्यायमूर्ति अनिल के. नरेंद्रन और न्यायमूर्ति हरिशंकर वी. मेनन की खंडपीठ द्वारा पारित किया गया
Recently uploaded (8)
Howard Fineman, Veteran Political Journalist and TV Pundit, Dies at 75
Howard Fineman, Veteran Political Journalist and TV Pundit, Dies at 75
Snigdha-Sreenath-Minor-v-Travancore-Devaswom-Board-WPCNO-39847-OF-2023-2024-L...
Snigdha-Sreenath-Minor-v-Travancore-Devaswom-Board-WPCNO-39847-OF-2023-2024-L...
9/9 FRI 9:30 | Combating Corruption By Being Ethical 2
- 1. Combating Corruption By Being Ethical APA Florida 2011 Conference Friday, September 9, 2011 Nancy Stroud, AICP JD Lewis Stroud & Deutsch, PL Boca Raton, FL