Web 2.0 contributions to multi-channel managementAn exploratory study of the travel, retail and healthcare industriesSjoerd Blauw
1.    2.   3.IntroductionAnalysisConclusions- Web 2.0- Multi-channel management- Problem Area- Objective
Web 2.01. IntroductionSocialTechnicalBusinessWeb 2.0Adapted from Stocker, Dosinger et al, 2007
Multi-Channel Management1. IntroductionManagementCoordinationIntegration Facilitation
Pre-Sales, Sales, After Sales1. IntroductionBhattacherjee, 2001; Simons, 2006
Problem Area1. Introduction Technology push
 Interactivity of Web 2.0
 LiteraturegapMain Research Question1. IntroductionHow is Web 2.0 able to contribute to multi-channel management                         for business to consumer interaction                     to companies in the travel, retail and healthcare industries?
Objectives1. Introduction Web 2.0 description
 Asses contributions of Web 2.0 to multi-channel management
 Give recommendations1.    2.   3.IntroductionAnalysisConclusions- MethodologyFindings
Web 2.0 implementation recommendations- Web 2.0- Multi-channel management- Problem Area- Objective
Methodology2. Analysis Case study strategySelecting casesCrafting instruments and protocolsEntering the fieldData analysisResearch closureEisenhardt, 1989, p.533
Findings: Pre-Sales2. AnalysisAdditional channelsFindings: Pre-Sales2. AnalysisTechnical implementationsFindings: Pre-Sales2. AnalysisBusiness aspect: Social networkingFindings: Sales2. AnalysisServed by traditional channelsFindings: After Sales2. Analysis Social networks and Micro blogging
 “My Pages”Recommendations (I)2. Analysis
Recommendations (II)2. Analysis
1.    2.   3.IntroductionAnalysisConclusions- Contributions- Conclusions- MethodologyFindings
Web 2.0 implementation recommendationsScientific Contributions (I)3. ConclusionsFigure from 2006
Scientific Contributions (II)3. ConclusionsThe three phases of the channel functions developed by Simons (2006) are not a linear process but a cycle After SalesSalesPre-Sales
Scientific Contributions (II)3. ConclusionsThe three phases of the channel functions developed by Simons (2006) are not a linear process but a cycleLimitations3. ConclusionsFocus on three industries
Focus on B2C interaction
Limited lifespan research findings
Convenient sample
Customer perspectiveConclusions3. ConclusionsYesIs Web 2.0 contributing?InteractivityHow?Publish, Micro blogging, Social networkingWhich tools?Additional channels Decision supportPre-SalesWhen?
Backup Slides
Simons 2007, p.32Interactivity modelsHummel & Lechner, 2002, p. 1
Simons 2007, p.32Channel Functions
Simons 2007, p.32Channel Contact Typesadapted from Ebbers, Pieterson et al. (2007) and Pieterson, Teerling et al. (2007)
Simons 2007, p.32MCM definitionMulti-channel management is the coordination, integration and usage of multiple channels using different media, which reinforce each other, to create value for the customer and acquire, retain and develop customers which leads to optimal company returns.adapted from Cespedes (1988), Schulze(2000), Stone, Hobbs et al. (2002), Neslin, Grewal et al.(2006), Nieuwehuis & Kan (2006), Sfirtsis (2006) and Rosenbloom (2007)
Simons 2007, p.32Web 2.0 DefinitionWeb 2.0 is defined as a transformation of the social and technological aspects into business, leading to a redesign of existing business processes or to an evolution of new business models characterized by user participation, openness, and network effects.adapted from Stocker, Dösinger et al. (2007) and Musser & O’Reilly (2007)
Simons 2007, p.32Industry – NACE – Company list
Simons 2007, p.32Decision Rules – Business Aspects
Findings Table2. AnalysisWeb 2.0 UsageBhattacherjee, 2001’ Simons, 2007 p.32
TwitterAwarenessPublishingFunSocial networksTwitterPublishingReview & RatingReview & RatingSocial networksSocial networks
No Web 2.0 applications usedall sales steps are performed using traditional channels
“My Pages”Twitter“My Pages” / NewslettersTelephoneChatSocial networksSocial networksVarious tools
Recommendations Complete2. AnalysisFun channelsWeb 2.0 in sales phaseChat channels for calamity support and distress reliefIntegration of social networksSocial network in decision support step in retail industryMicro blogging healthcare industry
Scientific Contributions Complete3. ConclusionsTurning over the control of the channel to the customer.the degree of change is much higher compared to offline mediaMany partial Web 2.0 implementations are used.The barrier between offline and online channels is diminishingWeb 2.0 is appears that Web 2.0 is used as an extra feature besides traditional forms of communicationThe three phases of the channel functions developed by Simons (2006) are not a linear process but a cycleThe data protocol developed and used in this research can be reused in future research

Web 2.0 Contributions To Multi-Channel Management

Editor's Notes

  • #4 Web 2.0 is defined using three aspects:The social aspect focuses on the type of customer participation, what are they contributing and why?The technical aspects makes the implementation work, think of wiki’s and other technical applicationsBusiness focuses on creating value or using the Web 2.0 implementation for a specific goalTogether they make a Web 2.0 application, none of the aspects are leading
  • #5 Multi-channel management is the management, coordination, integration and facilitation of channels and customer interaction. Channels are ways of interaction with the customer, examples are newspapers, books, telephone, internet or physical shops.
  • #6 These interactions are often separated into three phases.First is pre-sales, the customer is orientating on the market and products availableAfter making a decision the sales phases is were the contract is made and the goods are deliveredFinally is the after sales phase, in this phase the customer is supported in any matter concerning the product.
  • #7 The problem area arises by combining Web 2.0 and MCM Is technology push; it is not a current problem but a push of using new technologiesInteractivity; Web 2.0 main changes are the UGC en user power, this is new to MCMNo previous research
  • #9 There is much discussion about Web 2.0 and using the previous described aspects can structured this discussing leading to a shared understanding of the conceptWeb 2.0 is a technology push but what is it able to contribute toGive recommendations to companies to implement Web 2.0 into MCM portfolio
  • #11 Ten cases per industry; convenient sample; selected using google/awards/knowledge exchangeData protocol developed using Web 2.0 aspects and mcm channel functions; codifying the website based on decision rulesPublic Website analysis; intercoder reliability check 82%Selecting top 3 usage per channel functionRecommendationsNext, we look into the findings per phase (pre-sales-after)
  • #12 Web 2.0 as additional channel
  • #13 Main tools are Micro blogging, Publishing, Social Networks and Review & Rating
  • #14 Business aspect focuses on creating communities
  • #17 fun
  • #18 Social network in decision support step in retail industry
  • #20 Turning over the control of the channel to the customer.
  • #23 Focus on three industriesB2C interaction, not B2B or internalChange of channels -> longitude researchConvenient casesSocial aspect not measuredWhat is “good” usage?
  • #38 Misschien 1 of 2 goedtoelichten en de rest niet?