WASHwatch is an online platform that monitors global water and sanitation progress. It aims to enhance collaboration around monitoring by gathering the most up-to-date WASH data and information in one publicly accessible place. This allows users to track country-level commitments, progress, and statistics to inform advocacy and decision-making. The platform also enables users to share their own knowledge and evidence to challenge or support reported progress, contributing to transparent and collaborative monitoring at both national and global levels.
Assessing Country Ownership of Routine Health Information Systems for Sustain...JSI
The Advancing Partners & Communities Project presented a poster on an assessment of efforts in Ethiopia to strengthen local ownership of the RHIS, with an emphasis on efforts in the SNNPR Region.
Assessing Country Ownership of Routine Health Information Systems for Sustain...JSI
The Advancing Partners & Communities Project presented a poster on an assessment of efforts in Ethiopia to strengthen local ownership of the RHIS, with an emphasis on efforts in the SNNPR Region.
PPT SusAnA Webinar #2: "collaborative monitoring" by WASHwatch & WaterAidWASHwatch
Presentation for the SuSanA monthly webinar #2 on 26 May 2016 by Ellen Greggio, Programme Advisor , Monitoring & Mapping, WaterAid & Elisa Dehove, Policy Officer, Monitoring and Accountability, WaterAid
Summary results of TrackFin's testing in Brazil, Ghana and MoroccoTrackFin
This 4-pager is a short summary of the objectives of the TrackFin Initiative and the results from the testing in three countries (Brazil, Ghana and Morocco).
Key findings, lessons learned and next steps for TrackFinTrackFin
This presentation was made during the TrackFin Intercountry Workshop in Rabat on 28-29th September 2014. It summarises the key finding and lessons learned from developing WASH-Accounts in the 3 countries (Brazil, Ghana and Morocco). It makes recommendations for the way forward, from the short to the longer term.
Building national water and sanitation monitoring capacity in HaitiJohn Feighery
Presentation by mWater to the USAID Haiti Mission office on the experiences and lessons learned during the USAID Haiti Water and Sanitation Project (WATSAN). Includes a discussion of the challenges in improving public services in low-resource countries, the possibilities of using data-driven management, and specific outcomes achieved in Haiti. Closes with lessons learned that can be applied in other contexts.
Introduction to the Development Finance Work and Systems at OECD DACExternalEvents
The OECD-CRS classifications, which includes classifications of purposes, sectors, donors, recipients, and type of aid, are used by IATI publishers to ensure data interoperability. OECD will present the data cycle, process management, and updates of CRS classifications. These codelists evolve over time, creating challenges in codelist management, particularly in terms of their evolution, concordances, and available formats.
Accountability Initiative is holding a bar-camp on June 5-6. This bar camp would focus on accountability issues in India. This presentation is being made to facilitate ideas on what can be done in India.
Sander van der Waal's (Open Knowledge Foundation) presentation at Prague Open Data Meetup #7: Linked Open Cities.
The event was organised by Otakar Motejl Fund and LOD2 project. More info: bit.ly/open-cities-meetup
Country Responses to the Financial Crisis Naomi Ngwira Engicgfmconference
“Country Responses to the Financial Crisis”
Behxhet Brajshori, Deputy Minister, Ministry of the Economy and Finance, Republic of Kosovo
Lulzim Ismajli, Director of Treasury, Ministry of the Economy and Finance, Republic of Kosovo
Naomi Ngwira, Director, Department of Debt and Aid, Ministry of Finance, Malawi
Obadiah Mailafia, Chariman, Center for Policy and Economic Research, Nigeria
During this panel, participants will share observations of the effects of the crisis on their economies and future plans. They will also share existing tools to safeguard their investments.
The session will include a discussion on how they are mitigating the impacts and how they
expect to cover the cost. Panelists and the audience will be asked to address the following
questions.
Registration
Immediate Actions Being Taken to Manage the Impact
Is the situation different for middle vs. lower income countries?
How does the current financial crisis affect a country’s ability to borrow?
Is the situation different for resource rich countries?
Can we learn anything from previous financial crises (e.g. Asia and Latin America)?
How are recipient countries more efficiently managing their donor aid?
What is the role of the government in solving financial sector issues?
Summary presentation: Preventing corruption:A Toolkit for Parliamentarians (Draft – developed with GOPAC, the Global Organization of Parliamentarians Against Corruption), Oslo, 2 February 2010 Marie Laberge, UNDP Oslo Governance Centre
Executive Summary
The Foundation for Democratic Advancement (FDA) asserts that municipalities like any other government department and agency, corporation, and non-profit/charity organization are expected to operate efficiently and effectively in order to provide adequate services at reasonable cost. In this report, the FDA is not promoting and will never promote the idea that municipalities have the right to impose their own levies in order to create more revenue. The reader knows that extra revenue and abundance of cash and resources may lead to complacency, inefficiency, waste, and corruption. However, the FDA supports and advocates that municipalities have the right, when needed and warranted, to supplement their revenue in order to provide services and develop and maintain safe and reliable communities.
In its research, the Foundation for Democratic Advancement uncovers the bias of section 648 of the Alberta Municipal Government Act (MGA, 2000) and the section’s inconsistent application throughout Alberta. As it stands, section 648 only allows Alberta municipalities to charge hard infrastructure levies (such as charges for sewer or water infrastructure) on new off-site developments as opposed to municipalities having the discretionary capacity to charge for both hard and soft levies which includes police and fire services, parks, and community infrastructure. Currently, several Alberta cities (most notably the City of Calgary) bypass this restriction on levies by signing private negotiated agreements (standard development agreements) with development community stakeholders. These agreements allow the City of Calgary, for instance, to charge also for soft infrastructure levies because the development industry agreed to them, and therefore it cannot sue on grounds of violation of the MGA. All other Alberta municipalities are restricted to charging only hard infrastructure levies unless they too can negotiate private agreements with developers and/or developer associations. Moreover, the Government of Alberta ignores the bypass of section 648 by Alberta municipalities.
In the FDA’s view, section 648 is a process shortcoming by allowing developers to either avoid soft infrastructure levies or negotiate low levies from a strong negotiating position. In either scenario, Alberta municipal taxpayers likely pay more for the capital costs of new off-site developments, while developers, which are the principle profit beneficiaries of new developments, pay less. This issue resolves around who pays for soft infrastructure which is critical to new off-site infrastructure and the ability of municipalities to maintain safe and viable communities (MGA, Part 1, Section 3).
An off-site levy is one financing source to both pay for growth-related infrastructure and pass on infrastructure costs to those individuals and organizations who are the primary beneficiaries of the growth, and thereby ensure “growth pays for growth”....
PPT SusAnA Webinar #2: "collaborative monitoring" by WASHwatch & WaterAidWASHwatch
Presentation for the SuSanA monthly webinar #2 on 26 May 2016 by Ellen Greggio, Programme Advisor , Monitoring & Mapping, WaterAid & Elisa Dehove, Policy Officer, Monitoring and Accountability, WaterAid
Summary results of TrackFin's testing in Brazil, Ghana and MoroccoTrackFin
This 4-pager is a short summary of the objectives of the TrackFin Initiative and the results from the testing in three countries (Brazil, Ghana and Morocco).
Key findings, lessons learned and next steps for TrackFinTrackFin
This presentation was made during the TrackFin Intercountry Workshop in Rabat on 28-29th September 2014. It summarises the key finding and lessons learned from developing WASH-Accounts in the 3 countries (Brazil, Ghana and Morocco). It makes recommendations for the way forward, from the short to the longer term.
Building national water and sanitation monitoring capacity in HaitiJohn Feighery
Presentation by mWater to the USAID Haiti Mission office on the experiences and lessons learned during the USAID Haiti Water and Sanitation Project (WATSAN). Includes a discussion of the challenges in improving public services in low-resource countries, the possibilities of using data-driven management, and specific outcomes achieved in Haiti. Closes with lessons learned that can be applied in other contexts.
Introduction to the Development Finance Work and Systems at OECD DACExternalEvents
The OECD-CRS classifications, which includes classifications of purposes, sectors, donors, recipients, and type of aid, are used by IATI publishers to ensure data interoperability. OECD will present the data cycle, process management, and updates of CRS classifications. These codelists evolve over time, creating challenges in codelist management, particularly in terms of their evolution, concordances, and available formats.
Accountability Initiative is holding a bar-camp on June 5-6. This bar camp would focus on accountability issues in India. This presentation is being made to facilitate ideas on what can be done in India.
Sander van der Waal's (Open Knowledge Foundation) presentation at Prague Open Data Meetup #7: Linked Open Cities.
The event was organised by Otakar Motejl Fund and LOD2 project. More info: bit.ly/open-cities-meetup
Country Responses to the Financial Crisis Naomi Ngwira Engicgfmconference
“Country Responses to the Financial Crisis”
Behxhet Brajshori, Deputy Minister, Ministry of the Economy and Finance, Republic of Kosovo
Lulzim Ismajli, Director of Treasury, Ministry of the Economy and Finance, Republic of Kosovo
Naomi Ngwira, Director, Department of Debt and Aid, Ministry of Finance, Malawi
Obadiah Mailafia, Chariman, Center for Policy and Economic Research, Nigeria
During this panel, participants will share observations of the effects of the crisis on their economies and future plans. They will also share existing tools to safeguard their investments.
The session will include a discussion on how they are mitigating the impacts and how they
expect to cover the cost. Panelists and the audience will be asked to address the following
questions.
Registration
Immediate Actions Being Taken to Manage the Impact
Is the situation different for middle vs. lower income countries?
How does the current financial crisis affect a country’s ability to borrow?
Is the situation different for resource rich countries?
Can we learn anything from previous financial crises (e.g. Asia and Latin America)?
How are recipient countries more efficiently managing their donor aid?
What is the role of the government in solving financial sector issues?
Summary presentation: Preventing corruption:A Toolkit for Parliamentarians (Draft – developed with GOPAC, the Global Organization of Parliamentarians Against Corruption), Oslo, 2 February 2010 Marie Laberge, UNDP Oslo Governance Centre
Executive Summary
The Foundation for Democratic Advancement (FDA) asserts that municipalities like any other government department and agency, corporation, and non-profit/charity organization are expected to operate efficiently and effectively in order to provide adequate services at reasonable cost. In this report, the FDA is not promoting and will never promote the idea that municipalities have the right to impose their own levies in order to create more revenue. The reader knows that extra revenue and abundance of cash and resources may lead to complacency, inefficiency, waste, and corruption. However, the FDA supports and advocates that municipalities have the right, when needed and warranted, to supplement their revenue in order to provide services and develop and maintain safe and reliable communities.
In its research, the Foundation for Democratic Advancement uncovers the bias of section 648 of the Alberta Municipal Government Act (MGA, 2000) and the section’s inconsistent application throughout Alberta. As it stands, section 648 only allows Alberta municipalities to charge hard infrastructure levies (such as charges for sewer or water infrastructure) on new off-site developments as opposed to municipalities having the discretionary capacity to charge for both hard and soft levies which includes police and fire services, parks, and community infrastructure. Currently, several Alberta cities (most notably the City of Calgary) bypass this restriction on levies by signing private negotiated agreements (standard development agreements) with development community stakeholders. These agreements allow the City of Calgary, for instance, to charge also for soft infrastructure levies because the development industry agreed to them, and therefore it cannot sue on grounds of violation of the MGA. All other Alberta municipalities are restricted to charging only hard infrastructure levies unless they too can negotiate private agreements with developers and/or developer associations. Moreover, the Government of Alberta ignores the bypass of section 648 by Alberta municipalities.
In the FDA’s view, section 648 is a process shortcoming by allowing developers to either avoid soft infrastructure levies or negotiate low levies from a strong negotiating position. In either scenario, Alberta municipal taxpayers likely pay more for the capital costs of new off-site developments, while developers, which are the principle profit beneficiaries of new developments, pay less. This issue resolves around who pays for soft infrastructure which is critical to new off-site infrastructure and the ability of municipalities to maintain safe and viable communities (MGA, Part 1, Section 3).
An off-site levy is one financing source to both pay for growth-related infrastructure and pass on infrastructure costs to those individuals and organizations who are the primary beneficiaries of the growth, and thereby ensure “growth pays for growth”....
RFP for Reno's Community Assistance CenterThis Is Reno
Property appraisals completed in May for downtown Reno’s Community Assistance and Triage Centers (CAC) reveal that repairing the buildings to bring them back into service would cost an estimated $10.1 million—nearly four times the amount previously reported by city staff.
Monitoring Health for the SDGs - Global Health Statistics 2024 - WHOChristina Parmionova
The 2024 World Health Statistics edition reviews more than 50 health-related indicators from the Sustainable Development Goals and WHO’s Thirteenth General Programme of Work. It also highlights the findings from the Global health estimates 2021, notably the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on life expectancy and healthy life expectancy.
About Potato, The scientific name of the plant is Solanum tuberosum (L).Christina Parmionova
The potato is a starchy root vegetable native to the Americas that is consumed as a staple food in many parts of the world. Potatoes are tubers of the plant Solanum tuberosum, a perennial in the nightshade family Solanaceae. Wild potato species can be found from the southern United States to southern Chile
Synopsis (short abstract) In December 2023, the UN General Assembly proclaimed 30 May as the International Day of Potato.
Jennifer Schaus and Associates hosts a complimentary webinar series on The FAR in 2024. Join the webinars on Wednesdays and Fridays at noon, eastern.
Recordings are on YouTube and the company website.
https://www.youtube.com/@jenniferschaus/videos
Jennifer Schaus and Associates hosts a complimentary webinar series on The FAR in 2024. Join the webinars on Wednesdays and Fridays at noon, eastern.
Recordings are on YouTube and the company website.
https://www.youtube.com/@jenniferschaus/videos
Working with data is a challenge for many organizations. Nonprofits in particular may need to collect and analyze sensitive, incomplete, and/or biased historical data about people. In this talk, Dr. Cori Faklaris of UNC Charlotte provides an overview of current AI capabilities and weaknesses to consider when integrating current AI technologies into the data workflow. The talk is organized around three takeaways: (1) For better or sometimes worse, AI provides you with “infinite interns.” (2) Give people permission & guardrails to learn what works with these “interns” and what doesn’t. (3) Create a roadmap for adding in more AI to assist nonprofit work, along with strategies for bias mitigation.
Preliminary findings _OECD field visits to ten regions in the TSI EU mining r...OECDregions
Preliminary findings from OECD field visits for the project: Enhancing EU Mining Regional Ecosystems to Support the Green Transition and Secure Mineral Raw Materials Supply.
Donate to charity during this holiday seasonSERUDS INDIA
For people who have money and are philanthropic, there are infinite opportunities to gift a needy person or child a Merry Christmas. Even if you are living on a shoestring budget, you will be surprised at how much you can do.
Donate Us
https://serudsindia.org/how-to-donate-to-charity-during-this-holiday-season/
#charityforchildren, #donateforchildren, #donateclothesforchildren, #donatebooksforchildren, #donatetoysforchildren, #sponsorforchildren, #sponsorclothesforchildren, #sponsorbooksforchildren, #sponsortoysforchildren, #seruds, #kurnool
2. Why monitoring?
• It identifies gaps/challenges and reveal what works and what
does not work. It can help officials make informed
decisions about targeting resources in the most equitable
way.
• Collaborative monitoring shows governments
that Citizens are mobilised around WASH issues and hold
their government to account It can motivates
governments to take action.
• It allows making regional, national and even global
comparisons (within certain limits ) a motivation factor to
do better than the others and not be the bad student.
3. WASHwatch: introduction
Why is monitoring important?
• To track progress: where are we at?
• To improve accountability: is my
country meeting its promise?
• To demonstrate impacts of efforts to
improve conditions and services:
what have we learned?
4. WASHwatch: introduction
WASHwatch is an online platform.
Its mission is to enhance
collaboration to monitor global
water and sanitation progress
WASHwatch is funded by the Bill and
Melinda Gates Foundation. It is
administered by WaterAid but operates
independently
5. Find your country’s latest WASH developments
to inform your work. Much vital WASH data is scattered
across the internet, buried in reports or hidden in desk drawers.
WASHwatch gathers the most up-to-date and reliable information
in one public and easily accessible place, to help you work
effectively to improve global WASH access.
Find out about your country’s latest WASH
commitments and progress. View comments from other
WASHwatch collaborators who have reported on their countries’
performance towards commitments. You can even compare your
country’s performance with that of others.
WASHwatch: introduction
- How does WASHwatch adresses these
shortfalls?
7. How does the WASHwatch
platform work? (1/7)
Select a
country
8. How does the WASHwatch
platform work? (2/7)
Each country
is broken
down into
three main
sections,
accessed
through the
tabs.
9. How does the WASHwatch
platform work? (3/7)
Declarations and commitments tab: Click on a declaration to view commitments
and evidence of progress shared by WASHwatch contributors like you
Evidence of progress
is gathered next to
the commitment
they refer to.
10. How does the WASHwatch
platform work? (4/7)
Evidence opens in a
pop up window
11. How does the WASHwatch
platform work? (5/7)
Country profile: Find information about monitoring and coordination mechanisms
in your country, as well as main policies
12. How does the WASHwatch
platform work? (6/7)
Les statistiques sont mis a jours
tous les six mois et proviennent de
sources fiables (OMS, UNICEF, …)
mais sont aussi ouverts aux
commentaires.
Statistics: View your country’s WASH-related statistics
13. How does the WASHwatch
platform work? (7/7)
The
interactive
maps show
progress
around the
globe
14. Q&A
Q: Can anyone submit their in-country knowledge to
WASHwatch?
A: Because all point of views should be heard, WASHwatch is committed to
publish any information shared with the team within 24 hours. with name of
the source. It is to the user to decide if the source is a valuable source or
not.
Q: Is WASHwatch regularly updated?
A: WASHwatch is updated every 6 month with the latest data available and
we add information related to progress on commitments as soon as they are
made available.
Q: Is WASHwatch sustainable?
Many monitoring website die after only few years. WASHwatch is committed
to remain available and to archive monitoring knowledge.
15. How can you use and contribute
to WASHwatch?
WASHwatch is only as good as
the use you make of it &
the information you put into it!
16. GET your voice heard &
SHARE your knowledge (1/3)
Share your comments and evidence to challenge
governments and donors reported progress on
commitments.
Your evidence of progress
will be added next to the
commitment it refers to
17. GET your voice heard &
SHARE your knowledge (2/3)
What kind of knowledge should you share?
WASH DATA & INFO such as government spending toward
WASH, alternative WASH access data, dates of Joint Sector Review,
info on national WASH platform, links to online monitoring
platform (such as presimetre), sector coordinator contacts …
• OFFICIAL DOCUMENT such as a strategy, plans, budgets, Joint Sector
Reviews, meeting minutes, statements of commitments, …
• INFORMAL EVIDENCE such as observations, news articles, speeches,
letters
• SECTOR ANNALYSIS such as assessment of current behaviours,
analysis of what needs to change to deliver better WASH services …
EVIDENCE OF PROGRESS TOWARD COMMITMENTS
18. info@washwatch.org
Or send us an email
GET your voice heard &
SHARE your knowledge (3/3)
How to share your knowledge?
19. STAY UPDATED
Subscribe to WASHwatch
updates to get an email
whenever a new evidence on
the countries that interest
you is added to the site.
20. KEEP your website
updated on WASH
Click on the icon <>
and follow
instructions
See an
example on
the Share
research
website
22. The information gathered on WASHwatch and several
functionalities can help you develop advocacy briefs,
develop your analysis of the sector…
This is what End Water Poverty did to develop their
report on “Realising the Human Right to
Water and sanitation”:
USE the WASHwatch data
Water and Sanitation maps with projection (according to current trends) until 2030.
Tim to talk in more details about the commitments
Every time WASHwatch update content on its website, the embedded content will automatically update itself as well.
Please contact us if you need assistance in embedding WASHwatch content on your blog or Website: info@washwatch.org
A good way to compare progress on SACOSAN commitments for example.