Thrombosis In Cancer:

    Gerald A Soff MD
Armand Trousseau
                   (1801-1867)
• 1. First to associate thrombosis and malignancy.
• 2. First to suggest screening for malignancy in
  recurrent or idiopathic thromboembolic disease.
• 3. First to suggest that the pathophysiology was not
  mechanical obstruction, but a change in the character
  in the coagulation system itself.
• 4. First to suggest the association may be integral to
  the cancer growth itself.
   – Khorana AA. J. Thrombosis & Haemostasis, 2003
January 1, 1867

      • “Peter, I am lost, the
        phlebitis that has just
        appeared tonight leaves
        me no doubt about the
        nature of my illness.”
      • He died six months later
        of gastric cancer.
Risk of DVT and PE in Patients
             With Cancer
 20% of cancer patients develop VTE at some point
  during their illness
 20% of VTE occurs in cancer patients
   – Heit, 2005; Prandoni et al, 2005; Hillen, 2000.
 Pulmonary embolism represents 1/7 of deaths in
  hospitalized cancer patients in early studies.
   – Pruemer J. Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm. 62:S4-
     6, 2005.



                                                       4
Thrombosis at Time of Cancer Diagnosis
      Associated With Worse Prognosis




• 1 year survival rate for patients with advanced cancer:
   • Presented with VTE: 12%
   • Presented without VTE: 36%
   • Sorensen H et al. N Engl J Med, 2000
Effect of Malignancy on the Risk of Venous
Thrombosis Depending on the Duration Between
 Diagnosis of Cancer and Venous Thrombosis




Redrawn from Blom JW, et al. JAMA 2005;293(6):715-722.
Causes of death in 4466 cancer patients
    receiving outpatient chemotherapy
         Cause of Death           N (%)
        All                       141 (100)
        Progression of cancer     100 (70.9)
        Thromboembolism           13 (9.2)
              Arterial            8 (5.6)
              Venous              5 (3.5)
        Infection                 13 (9.2)
        Respiratory failure       5 (3.5)
        Bleeding                  2 (1.4)
        Aspiration pneumonitis    2 (1.4)
        Other                     9 (6.4)
        Unknown                   5 (3.5)

Khorana AA et al. JTH 5: 632–634, 2007.
Venous Thrombosis Increases Mortality and
Length Of Stay at MSKCC By About 3-Fold.
  25                        Overall Mortality Rate (%)
                            Overall mean LOS (Days)
  20                        Mortality Rate with VTE (%)
                            Mean LOS With VTE (Days)

  15

  10

  5

  0
       2002   2003   2004   2005     2006      2007
Identification of Malignancy After
         Episode of Thrombosis

   Study         Idiopathic   Secondary    Odds Ratio
                Thrombosis    Thrombosis
Meta-Analysis      50/668      19/1100        4.3
 of 7 Studies      (7.5%)       (1.7%)
(1986-1998)

 •Likelihood of finding an occult malignancy is
 much greater after an unprovoked VTE than a
 secondary VTE.
Should We Screen For Cancers In
    Patients With Idiopathic VTE?
• Idiopathic thrombosis: 7.5% - 10% diagnosed with cancer within
  1-2 years.
• 40-60% of patients already have metastatic disease when their
  cancer becomes clinically evident,
• Likelihood of finding early, curable cancers that present with
  thromboembolic disease when cancer is only detectable by
  aggressive work-up is small.
• Recommend appropriate routine cancer screening for age &
  sex, i.e. colonoscopy, prostate exam, mammography, pap and
  pelvic exam, etc.
• Follow-up work-up indicated only if initial History/Physical and
  routine labs suggest specific site.
Risk of Venous Thrombosis per
        Type of Malignancy
                            Adjusted Odds Ratio (95% CI)
      No Malignancy                     1.00
          Lung                     22.2 (3.6-136.1)
 All Hematological Cancer          28.0 (4.0-199.7)
           GI                      20.3 (4.9-83.0)
          Breast                    4.9 (2.3-10.5)
          Brain                     6.7 (1.0-45.4)
          Skin                      3.8 (1.1-12.9)
          ENT                       1.6 (0.4-6.4)

Blom JW, et al. JAMA 2005;293(6):715-722.
VTE In Cancer

• Virtually all cancers, solid tumor and
  hematologic malignancies, are associated
  with thrombotic risk.
• The thrombotic risk appears to be related to
  the nature of the specific tumor, and not
  simply tumor burden or advanced stage of
  disease.
• Most VTE occur “early” and not as a pre-
  morbid event.
Virchow’s Triad:
  Pathophysiology Of Thrombosis

     Altered blood             Altered blood
      vessel wall              flow/venous
                                   stasis




                 Increase in blood
Cancer             coagulability
Coagulation And Vascular Factors
     Contribute to Cancer Associated
               Thrombosis
• 1. Tissue Factor:
   – Tumor cells directly produce and release Tissue Factor.
   – Tissue Factor circulates in microparticles and may result
      in systemic thrombotic risk.
• 2. Platelets:
   – Early literature suggested role of platelets
      adhesion/metastasis of malignant cells.
• 3. Endothelial cell damage.
   – Following endothelial cell damage, blood is exposed to a
      thrombogenic surface.
   – Antiangiogenic agents target endothelial cells.
TF Expression is Markedly Increased in
Pancreatic Cancer, Compared With Normal
          Pancreatic Epithelium.




• Nitori N. et al. Clin. Canc. Res. 11, 2531-2539, 2005
TF Expression In Pancreatic
  Neoplasia and Thrombosis Rates
• Low TF expression, VTE Rate: 4.5%
• High TF expression, VTE Rate: 26.3%

• 4-fold Risk Ratio, (P = 0.04).
  – (Khorana AA. Clin. Canc. Res. 13, 2870-
    2875, 2007.)
TF Expression Predicts Poor Survival In
 Resected Pancreatic Cancer Patients.
      All cancer patients                   With Lymph
                                            node
                                            involvement




  Few deaths related to VTE. Therefore, poor prognosis associated
   with increased TF expression is largely independent of
   thrombosis.
  Nitori N. et al. Clin. Canc. Res. 11, 2531-2539, 2005
Tissue Factor/Coagulation And
         Cancer Progression
• Activation of oncogene/inactivation of tumor
  suppressor gene results in cellular
  transformation and TF expression as parallel
  pathways.
  – MET, RAS, P53, PTEN, HIF-1 have been shown to regulate
    the expression of TF and other coagulation- related factors.
  – Boccaccio and Comoglio. JCO. 27:4827-4833, 2009
  – Coagulation may not directly contribute to tumor growth &
    progression.
Expression of Tissue Factor By
 Fibrosarcoma Cells in Mice




  • Palumbo, J et al. Blood 2007 110: 133-141
Effects of Coagulation System
     on Primary and Metastatic
           Tumor Growth
• Serine proteases degrade local extracellular matrix, facilitating
  invasion and angiogenesis.
• Locally, cancers produce a fibrin network which protects
  against immune surveillance and provides the scaffolding for
  invasion and angiogenesis.
• Thrombin and other enzymes activate “Protease-Activated
  Receptors” (PARs) which regulate cancer, platelets, and
  endothelial cells.
Systemic Effects of Tissue Factor?
• Why do patients experience
  thrombosis at sites distant from the
  underlying cancer?

• If Tissue Factor is cell-surface
  associated, how does it influence
  cancer growth at distant sites?
Tissue Factor Circulates in Cell-
      Derived Microparticles.




Boulanger et al. Hypertension,   Hugel et al, Physiology 20: 22-27, 2005
2006
Antiangiogenic Agents Associated
           with Thrombosis
• Thalidomide-Lenalidomide (with
  Dexamethasone)
• Bevacizumab
• Sorafenib
• Sunitinib
• Others
   – Sidhu & Soff, 2008.
Predictive Model for Chemotherapy-
                  Associated VTE
                          Patient characteristic                 Risk Score
         Site of cancer
            Very high risk (stomach, pancreas)                       2
            High risk (lung, lymphoma, gynecologic, bladder,
         testicular)                                                 1
         Prechemotherapy platelet count 350 x 109/L or more          1
         Hemoglobin level less than 10 g/dL or use of red cell
         growth factors                                              1
         Prechemotherapy leukocyte count more than 11 x 109/L        1
         BMI 35 kg/m2 or more                                        1
Khorana AA et al. Blood. 111:4902-4907, 2008.
Khorana AA & Connolly GC. JCO. 27:4839-4847, 2009
Rates of VTE according to scores from the risk
model in the derivation and validation cohorts




 Khorana, A. A. et al. Blood 2008;111:4902-4907
Management of Thrombosis
   In Cancer Patients
Difficulty Using Warfarin For
Anticoagulation in Cancer Patients
• Unpredictable levels of anticoagulation
   – Drug interactions
   – Malnutrition/anorexia
   – Vomiting
   – Liver dysfunction.
• Need for interruption of therapy
   – Invasive procedures
   – Chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia
• Higher thrombosis recurrence rate with warfarin in cancer
  patients.
   – Prandoni et al Blood 100:3484-3488, 2002
CLOT Study
• Patients with cancer and DVT &/or PE.
• LMWH, (Dalteparin) compared with warfarin
  (vitamin K antagonist).
• All got LMWH (Dalteparin 200 IU/kg, SQ, daily
  for 5-7 days, then randomized to:
   – 6 months of Warfarin (INR target 2.5) or
   – 6 months of LMWH:
       • 200 IU/kg, SQ, daily for 1 month, then 150
         IU/kg for 5 months.
•   Lee et al. NEJM 349:146-53, 2003
Dalteparin Resulted in Approximately
               50% Reduction in Thrombosis
                        Recurrences




Lee, A. et al. N Engl J Med 2003;349:146-153
CLOT Study: Death From All Causes




• While VTE complications were reduced by effective anticoagulation with
LMWH this was not associated with improved survival.
• No evidence of an anti-tumor effect.
• Lee, A. Y.Y. et al. N Engl J Med 2003;349:146-153
Enoxaparin vs Warfarin in
Treatment of Thrombosis In Cancer
 • Enoxaparin 1.5 mg/kg qd in acute phase, then
   randomization to continued Enoxaparin or Warfarin
    – Meyer G et al. Arch Int Med. 162: 1729-1735, 2002
Is There A Benefit of Anticoagulation In Cancer
  Survival Beyond Treatment of Thrombosis?
  •   1. Several studies have shown that some anticoagulants,
      particularly LMWH, may prolong survival in cancer patients,
      specifically in “good” prognosis patients (i.e. those with no
      identifiable metastases).
        – May be synergistic with chemotherapy.
  •   2. Other studies have failed to show any benefit to overall
      survival.
  •   3. No human study has shown objective benefit of
      anticoagulation on tumor burden, (but no study designed to test
      this).
  •   4. Most studies suffer from heterogeneity of cancer types and
      stages.
  •   5. Anticoagulants are not currently recommended to improve
      survival in patients with cancer without VTE.
Characterization of Recurrent VTE In
               Cancer
Goal is to identify subgroup of VTE in
 cancer who have high or low recurrence
 rates, to better stratify needs for
 anticoagulation.
1,392 patients, treated for VTE with daily
 Dalteparin 200, 2008-2009 at MSKCC.
  – Weber C et al. ASH Abstract 2010.
Incidence of Recurrent VTE
       Variable            Recurrent 6 month incidence P value
                              VTE     of recurrent VTE
                          (frequency)      (95% CI)
     All patients             34      2.3% (1.7%-3.3%)
   Sex        Female          23      3.0% (2.0%-4.6%)   0.08
               Male           11      1.6% (0.8%-2.9%)
   Age     Continuous                                    0.04
Diagnosis      Lung           10     5.6% (3.1%-10.3%)   0.03
              Breast           4      2.7% (0.8%-8.3%)
              Ovarian          2      1.9% (0.5%-7.8%)
            Soft tissue        0              0
           Lymphoma            0              0
               Other          18      2.1% (1.3%-3.3%)

   Weber C et al. ASH Abstract 2010.
Age of Patients and VTE
          Recurrence Rates (%)
7.0
6.0
5.0
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
      <55 yr     55-64 yr   65-73 yr   74+ yr

  Weber C et al. ASH Abstract 2010.
Recurrent VTE
 The risk of death was 3-fold higher among
  patients with recurrent thrombosis.
 This result is maintained when sex, age, and
  diagnosis are included in a multivariate analysis.
 Age, tumor type, and gender may require
  different treatment strategies.
 Weber C et al. ASH Abstract 2010.
Incidental Pulmonary Embolism
 Clinical relevance?
 Risks of recurrence, need for anticoagulation?

 Retrospective cohort study (2004-2010)
 Incidental PE (n=51)
 Symptomatic PE (n=144)
 Observed for 1 year
 Den Exter P L et al. JCO 29:2405-2409, 2011.
Incidental vs. Symptomatic VTE

 Incidental and symptomatic patients did not differ with
  respect to mean age, sex, cancer type and
  stage, and risk factors for VTE.
 As a result from evolving treatment
  guidelines, approximately half of the patients in both
  groups received long-term treatment with vitamin K
  antagonists in stead of currently recommended low-
  molecular-weight heparin.
   – Den Exter P L et al. JCO 29:2405-2409, 2011.
Cumulative Recurrent VTE




den Exter P L et al. JCO 2011;29:2405-2409
Cumulative Overall Survival




den Exter P L et al. JCO 2011;29:2405-2409
Overall Survival           Recurrent Thrombosis-
                                Free Survival

Font C, et al. Annals of Oncology 22: 2101–2106, 2011
Thrombosis Prophylaxis In
       Hospitalized Medical Patients
                          Placebo   Treatment
                           Group Group Events Relative
  Trial       Agent      Events (%)    (%)     Risk             P
           Enoxaparin
MEDENOX 40 mg qd            14.9          5.5          0.37   <0.001
MEDENOX Enoxaparin
 (Cancer    40 mg qd
Subgroup)                   19.5          9.7          0.5
           Dalteparin
PREVENT 5000 Un pd          4.96         2.77          0.55   0.0015
          Fondaparinux
ARTEMIS     2.5 mg qd       10.5          5.6          0.47   0.029

   Lyman G, et al. J Clin Oncol 2007. 25:5490-5505.
Extended Thromboprophylaxis
     In Surgical Oncology Patients
         Thrombosis            “Short”      “Extended”           P
                             Prophylaxis    Prophylaxis
                             (7-10 days)     (4-5 weeks)
          DVT (%)                 15             6.5           <0.005
     Proximal DVT (%)             5               1            <0.01
    Symptomatic DVT (%)           1              0.3            0.27

   Pooled data from 4 studies of surgical patients with Low
    Molecular Weight Heparin.
   Data on mortality not significant.
   Kakkar AK. JCO 27:4881-4884, 2009
Rates of VTE in Recent Primary
       Prophylaxis Studies (Ambulatory)




                 Solid                     PancreasPancreas
                 Tumor                     Ca      Ca
Agnelli et al, 2009; Palumbo et al, 2009; Riess et al, 2009;
Maraveyas et al, 2009.
Recent Studies Of Extended Prophylaxis
         In High Risk Medical Patients
       Study                                        Primary       Major
                                                    Efficacy   Bleeding (%)
                                                  Endpoint (%)

    EXCLAIM           Placebo (after open-               4.0       0.3
     (2010)4         label enoxaparin run-
                              in)
                     Extended enoxaparin                 2.5       0.8
    MAGELLA          Enoxaparin/placebo                  5.7       0.4
       N
                    Extended rivaroxaban                 4.4       1.1

1. Samama et al, 1999; 2. Leizorovicz et al, 2004; 3. Cohen et
al, 2006; 4. Hull et al, 2010

                                                                              45
SAVE-ONCO
              Semuloparin   placebo      Hazard Ratio
                N=1,608     N= 1,604
Thrombosis     20 (1.2%)    55 (3.4%)          0.36            p<0.0001
                                        (95% CI: 0.21–0.60)
  Major        19 (1.2%)    18 (1.1%)          1.05
 Bleeding                               (95%CI 0.55 to 1.99)

 clinically      2.8%         2.0%          HR=1.40
  relevant                              (95%CI 0.89–2.21).
 bleeding

59% risk reduction in PE rate (odds ratio 0.41,
95%CI 0.19–0.85).
The Question Everyone Is Asking!
Should we use the new oral
 anticoagulants for VTE treatment in
 cancer?

Dabigatran (Pradaxa): Direct Thrombin
 Inhibitor
Rivaroxaban (Xarelto): FXa inhibitor
Apixaban: FXa inhibitor
Use In Cancer Patients
• Studies of the new agents did not have adequate
  cancer population for subgroup analysis.
• VTE treatment studies used warfarin as the control
  arm, but warfarin has already been shown to be unsafe
  and ineffective for DVT treatment in cancer patients.
   – Warfarin is not the standard of care in cancer.
• No reversal agent,
• No established assay to monitor dose/effect
• Specific studies will need to be conducted in cancer
  patients, with LMWH control.
Questions To Answer
• Does anticoagulation reduce primary or metastatic
  tumor growth?
• Is there a survival benefit from anticoagulation, separate
  from thrombosis prophylaxis?
• Is there a role for anti-platelet agents?
• In cancer setting, what is optimal anticoagulation
  therapy for indications besides venous thrombosis? (i.e.
  mechanical valves, atrial fibrillation)?
• Interaction of Thrombophilia in Patient and Tumor
  Progression?
Effect of Malignancy on the Risk of Venous
          Thrombosis Depending on the Duration Between
           Diagnosis of Cancer and Venous Thrombosis
           Duration Between Malignancy         Adjusted Odds Ratio
           and Venous Thrombosis               (95% CI)
           No Malignancy                       1.00
           All Malignancies                    4.3 (3.3-5.6)

           Time after index date (diagnosis)
           0 to <3 mo                          53.5 (8.6-334.3)
           >3 mo to <1 y                       14.3 (5.8-35.2)
           >1 to <3 y                          3.6 (2.0-6.5)
           >3 to <5 y                          3.0 (1.5-5.7)
           >5 to <10 y                         2.6 (1.4-4.7)
           >10 to <15 y                        2.3 (0.9-5.8)
           >15 y                               1.1 (0.6-2.2)
Redrawn from Blom JW, et al. JAMA 2005;293(6):715-722.

vte in cancer

  • 1.
    Thrombosis In Cancer: Gerald A Soff MD
  • 2.
    Armand Trousseau (1801-1867) • 1. First to associate thrombosis and malignancy. • 2. First to suggest screening for malignancy in recurrent or idiopathic thromboembolic disease. • 3. First to suggest that the pathophysiology was not mechanical obstruction, but a change in the character in the coagulation system itself. • 4. First to suggest the association may be integral to the cancer growth itself. – Khorana AA. J. Thrombosis & Haemostasis, 2003
  • 3.
    January 1, 1867 • “Peter, I am lost, the phlebitis that has just appeared tonight leaves me no doubt about the nature of my illness.” • He died six months later of gastric cancer.
  • 4.
    Risk of DVTand PE in Patients With Cancer  20% of cancer patients develop VTE at some point during their illness  20% of VTE occurs in cancer patients – Heit, 2005; Prandoni et al, 2005; Hillen, 2000.  Pulmonary embolism represents 1/7 of deaths in hospitalized cancer patients in early studies. – Pruemer J. Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm. 62:S4- 6, 2005. 4
  • 5.
    Thrombosis at Timeof Cancer Diagnosis Associated With Worse Prognosis • 1 year survival rate for patients with advanced cancer: • Presented with VTE: 12% • Presented without VTE: 36% • Sorensen H et al. N Engl J Med, 2000
  • 6.
    Effect of Malignancyon the Risk of Venous Thrombosis Depending on the Duration Between Diagnosis of Cancer and Venous Thrombosis Redrawn from Blom JW, et al. JAMA 2005;293(6):715-722.
  • 7.
    Causes of deathin 4466 cancer patients receiving outpatient chemotherapy Cause of Death N (%) All 141 (100) Progression of cancer 100 (70.9) Thromboembolism 13 (9.2) Arterial 8 (5.6) Venous 5 (3.5) Infection 13 (9.2) Respiratory failure 5 (3.5) Bleeding 2 (1.4) Aspiration pneumonitis 2 (1.4) Other 9 (6.4) Unknown 5 (3.5) Khorana AA et al. JTH 5: 632–634, 2007.
  • 8.
    Venous Thrombosis IncreasesMortality and Length Of Stay at MSKCC By About 3-Fold. 25 Overall Mortality Rate (%) Overall mean LOS (Days) 20 Mortality Rate with VTE (%) Mean LOS With VTE (Days) 15 10 5 0 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
  • 9.
    Identification of MalignancyAfter Episode of Thrombosis Study Idiopathic Secondary Odds Ratio Thrombosis Thrombosis Meta-Analysis 50/668 19/1100 4.3 of 7 Studies (7.5%) (1.7%) (1986-1998) •Likelihood of finding an occult malignancy is much greater after an unprovoked VTE than a secondary VTE.
  • 10.
    Should We ScreenFor Cancers In Patients With Idiopathic VTE? • Idiopathic thrombosis: 7.5% - 10% diagnosed with cancer within 1-2 years. • 40-60% of patients already have metastatic disease when their cancer becomes clinically evident, • Likelihood of finding early, curable cancers that present with thromboembolic disease when cancer is only detectable by aggressive work-up is small. • Recommend appropriate routine cancer screening for age & sex, i.e. colonoscopy, prostate exam, mammography, pap and pelvic exam, etc. • Follow-up work-up indicated only if initial History/Physical and routine labs suggest specific site.
  • 11.
    Risk of VenousThrombosis per Type of Malignancy Adjusted Odds Ratio (95% CI) No Malignancy 1.00 Lung 22.2 (3.6-136.1) All Hematological Cancer 28.0 (4.0-199.7) GI 20.3 (4.9-83.0) Breast 4.9 (2.3-10.5) Brain 6.7 (1.0-45.4) Skin 3.8 (1.1-12.9) ENT 1.6 (0.4-6.4) Blom JW, et al. JAMA 2005;293(6):715-722.
  • 12.
    VTE In Cancer •Virtually all cancers, solid tumor and hematologic malignancies, are associated with thrombotic risk. • The thrombotic risk appears to be related to the nature of the specific tumor, and not simply tumor burden or advanced stage of disease. • Most VTE occur “early” and not as a pre- morbid event.
  • 13.
    Virchow’s Triad: Pathophysiology Of Thrombosis Altered blood Altered blood vessel wall flow/venous stasis Increase in blood Cancer coagulability
  • 14.
    Coagulation And VascularFactors Contribute to Cancer Associated Thrombosis • 1. Tissue Factor: – Tumor cells directly produce and release Tissue Factor. – Tissue Factor circulates in microparticles and may result in systemic thrombotic risk. • 2. Platelets: – Early literature suggested role of platelets adhesion/metastasis of malignant cells. • 3. Endothelial cell damage. – Following endothelial cell damage, blood is exposed to a thrombogenic surface. – Antiangiogenic agents target endothelial cells.
  • 15.
    TF Expression isMarkedly Increased in Pancreatic Cancer, Compared With Normal Pancreatic Epithelium. • Nitori N. et al. Clin. Canc. Res. 11, 2531-2539, 2005
  • 16.
    TF Expression InPancreatic Neoplasia and Thrombosis Rates • Low TF expression, VTE Rate: 4.5% • High TF expression, VTE Rate: 26.3% • 4-fold Risk Ratio, (P = 0.04). – (Khorana AA. Clin. Canc. Res. 13, 2870- 2875, 2007.)
  • 17.
    TF Expression PredictsPoor Survival In Resected Pancreatic Cancer Patients. All cancer patients With Lymph node involvement  Few deaths related to VTE. Therefore, poor prognosis associated with increased TF expression is largely independent of thrombosis.  Nitori N. et al. Clin. Canc. Res. 11, 2531-2539, 2005
  • 18.
    Tissue Factor/Coagulation And Cancer Progression • Activation of oncogene/inactivation of tumor suppressor gene results in cellular transformation and TF expression as parallel pathways. – MET, RAS, P53, PTEN, HIF-1 have been shown to regulate the expression of TF and other coagulation- related factors. – Boccaccio and Comoglio. JCO. 27:4827-4833, 2009 – Coagulation may not directly contribute to tumor growth & progression.
  • 19.
    Expression of TissueFactor By Fibrosarcoma Cells in Mice • Palumbo, J et al. Blood 2007 110: 133-141
  • 20.
    Effects of CoagulationSystem on Primary and Metastatic Tumor Growth • Serine proteases degrade local extracellular matrix, facilitating invasion and angiogenesis. • Locally, cancers produce a fibrin network which protects against immune surveillance and provides the scaffolding for invasion and angiogenesis. • Thrombin and other enzymes activate “Protease-Activated Receptors” (PARs) which regulate cancer, platelets, and endothelial cells.
  • 21.
    Systemic Effects ofTissue Factor? • Why do patients experience thrombosis at sites distant from the underlying cancer? • If Tissue Factor is cell-surface associated, how does it influence cancer growth at distant sites?
  • 22.
    Tissue Factor Circulatesin Cell- Derived Microparticles. Boulanger et al. Hypertension, Hugel et al, Physiology 20: 22-27, 2005 2006
  • 23.
    Antiangiogenic Agents Associated with Thrombosis • Thalidomide-Lenalidomide (with Dexamethasone) • Bevacizumab • Sorafenib • Sunitinib • Others – Sidhu & Soff, 2008.
  • 24.
    Predictive Model forChemotherapy- Associated VTE Patient characteristic Risk Score Site of cancer Very high risk (stomach, pancreas) 2 High risk (lung, lymphoma, gynecologic, bladder, testicular) 1 Prechemotherapy platelet count 350 x 109/L or more 1 Hemoglobin level less than 10 g/dL or use of red cell growth factors 1 Prechemotherapy leukocyte count more than 11 x 109/L 1 BMI 35 kg/m2 or more 1 Khorana AA et al. Blood. 111:4902-4907, 2008. Khorana AA & Connolly GC. JCO. 27:4839-4847, 2009
  • 25.
    Rates of VTEaccording to scores from the risk model in the derivation and validation cohorts Khorana, A. A. et al. Blood 2008;111:4902-4907
  • 26.
    Management of Thrombosis In Cancer Patients
  • 27.
    Difficulty Using WarfarinFor Anticoagulation in Cancer Patients • Unpredictable levels of anticoagulation – Drug interactions – Malnutrition/anorexia – Vomiting – Liver dysfunction. • Need for interruption of therapy – Invasive procedures – Chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia • Higher thrombosis recurrence rate with warfarin in cancer patients. – Prandoni et al Blood 100:3484-3488, 2002
  • 28.
    CLOT Study • Patientswith cancer and DVT &/or PE. • LMWH, (Dalteparin) compared with warfarin (vitamin K antagonist). • All got LMWH (Dalteparin 200 IU/kg, SQ, daily for 5-7 days, then randomized to: – 6 months of Warfarin (INR target 2.5) or – 6 months of LMWH: • 200 IU/kg, SQ, daily for 1 month, then 150 IU/kg for 5 months. • Lee et al. NEJM 349:146-53, 2003
  • 29.
    Dalteparin Resulted inApproximately 50% Reduction in Thrombosis Recurrences Lee, A. et al. N Engl J Med 2003;349:146-153
  • 30.
    CLOT Study: DeathFrom All Causes • While VTE complications were reduced by effective anticoagulation with LMWH this was not associated with improved survival. • No evidence of an anti-tumor effect. • Lee, A. Y.Y. et al. N Engl J Med 2003;349:146-153
  • 31.
    Enoxaparin vs Warfarinin Treatment of Thrombosis In Cancer • Enoxaparin 1.5 mg/kg qd in acute phase, then randomization to continued Enoxaparin or Warfarin – Meyer G et al. Arch Int Med. 162: 1729-1735, 2002
  • 32.
    Is There ABenefit of Anticoagulation In Cancer Survival Beyond Treatment of Thrombosis? • 1. Several studies have shown that some anticoagulants, particularly LMWH, may prolong survival in cancer patients, specifically in “good” prognosis patients (i.e. those with no identifiable metastases). – May be synergistic with chemotherapy. • 2. Other studies have failed to show any benefit to overall survival. • 3. No human study has shown objective benefit of anticoagulation on tumor burden, (but no study designed to test this). • 4. Most studies suffer from heterogeneity of cancer types and stages. • 5. Anticoagulants are not currently recommended to improve survival in patients with cancer without VTE.
  • 33.
    Characterization of RecurrentVTE In Cancer Goal is to identify subgroup of VTE in cancer who have high or low recurrence rates, to better stratify needs for anticoagulation. 1,392 patients, treated for VTE with daily Dalteparin 200, 2008-2009 at MSKCC. – Weber C et al. ASH Abstract 2010.
  • 34.
    Incidence of RecurrentVTE Variable Recurrent 6 month incidence P value VTE of recurrent VTE (frequency) (95% CI) All patients 34 2.3% (1.7%-3.3%) Sex Female 23 3.0% (2.0%-4.6%) 0.08 Male 11 1.6% (0.8%-2.9%) Age Continuous 0.04 Diagnosis Lung 10 5.6% (3.1%-10.3%) 0.03 Breast 4 2.7% (0.8%-8.3%) Ovarian 2 1.9% (0.5%-7.8%) Soft tissue 0 0 Lymphoma 0 0 Other 18 2.1% (1.3%-3.3%) Weber C et al. ASH Abstract 2010.
  • 35.
    Age of Patientsand VTE Recurrence Rates (%) 7.0 6.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 <55 yr 55-64 yr 65-73 yr 74+ yr Weber C et al. ASH Abstract 2010.
  • 36.
    Recurrent VTE  Therisk of death was 3-fold higher among patients with recurrent thrombosis.  This result is maintained when sex, age, and diagnosis are included in a multivariate analysis.  Age, tumor type, and gender may require different treatment strategies.  Weber C et al. ASH Abstract 2010.
  • 37.
    Incidental Pulmonary Embolism Clinical relevance?  Risks of recurrence, need for anticoagulation?  Retrospective cohort study (2004-2010)  Incidental PE (n=51)  Symptomatic PE (n=144)  Observed for 1 year  Den Exter P L et al. JCO 29:2405-2409, 2011.
  • 38.
    Incidental vs. SymptomaticVTE  Incidental and symptomatic patients did not differ with respect to mean age, sex, cancer type and stage, and risk factors for VTE.  As a result from evolving treatment guidelines, approximately half of the patients in both groups received long-term treatment with vitamin K antagonists in stead of currently recommended low- molecular-weight heparin. – Den Exter P L et al. JCO 29:2405-2409, 2011.
  • 39.
    Cumulative Recurrent VTE denExter P L et al. JCO 2011;29:2405-2409
  • 40.
    Cumulative Overall Survival denExter P L et al. JCO 2011;29:2405-2409
  • 41.
    Overall Survival Recurrent Thrombosis- Free Survival Font C, et al. Annals of Oncology 22: 2101–2106, 2011
  • 42.
    Thrombosis Prophylaxis In Hospitalized Medical Patients Placebo Treatment Group Group Events Relative Trial Agent Events (%) (%) Risk P Enoxaparin MEDENOX 40 mg qd 14.9 5.5 0.37 <0.001 MEDENOX Enoxaparin (Cancer 40 mg qd Subgroup) 19.5 9.7 0.5 Dalteparin PREVENT 5000 Un pd 4.96 2.77 0.55 0.0015 Fondaparinux ARTEMIS 2.5 mg qd 10.5 5.6 0.47 0.029  Lyman G, et al. J Clin Oncol 2007. 25:5490-5505.
  • 43.
    Extended Thromboprophylaxis In Surgical Oncology Patients Thrombosis “Short” “Extended” P Prophylaxis Prophylaxis (7-10 days) (4-5 weeks) DVT (%) 15 6.5 <0.005 Proximal DVT (%) 5 1 <0.01 Symptomatic DVT (%) 1 0.3 0.27  Pooled data from 4 studies of surgical patients with Low Molecular Weight Heparin.  Data on mortality not significant.  Kakkar AK. JCO 27:4881-4884, 2009
  • 44.
    Rates of VTEin Recent Primary Prophylaxis Studies (Ambulatory) Solid PancreasPancreas Tumor Ca Ca Agnelli et al, 2009; Palumbo et al, 2009; Riess et al, 2009; Maraveyas et al, 2009.
  • 45.
    Recent Studies OfExtended Prophylaxis In High Risk Medical Patients Study Primary Major Efficacy Bleeding (%) Endpoint (%) EXCLAIM Placebo (after open- 4.0 0.3 (2010)4 label enoxaparin run- in) Extended enoxaparin 2.5 0.8 MAGELLA Enoxaparin/placebo 5.7 0.4 N Extended rivaroxaban 4.4 1.1 1. Samama et al, 1999; 2. Leizorovicz et al, 2004; 3. Cohen et al, 2006; 4. Hull et al, 2010 45
  • 46.
    SAVE-ONCO Semuloparin placebo Hazard Ratio N=1,608 N= 1,604 Thrombosis 20 (1.2%) 55 (3.4%) 0.36 p<0.0001 (95% CI: 0.21–0.60) Major 19 (1.2%) 18 (1.1%) 1.05 Bleeding (95%CI 0.55 to 1.99) clinically 2.8% 2.0% HR=1.40 relevant (95%CI 0.89–2.21). bleeding 59% risk reduction in PE rate (odds ratio 0.41, 95%CI 0.19–0.85).
  • 48.
    The Question EveryoneIs Asking! Should we use the new oral anticoagulants for VTE treatment in cancer? Dabigatran (Pradaxa): Direct Thrombin Inhibitor Rivaroxaban (Xarelto): FXa inhibitor Apixaban: FXa inhibitor
  • 49.
    Use In CancerPatients • Studies of the new agents did not have adequate cancer population for subgroup analysis. • VTE treatment studies used warfarin as the control arm, but warfarin has already been shown to be unsafe and ineffective for DVT treatment in cancer patients. – Warfarin is not the standard of care in cancer. • No reversal agent, • No established assay to monitor dose/effect • Specific studies will need to be conducted in cancer patients, with LMWH control.
  • 50.
    Questions To Answer •Does anticoagulation reduce primary or metastatic tumor growth? • Is there a survival benefit from anticoagulation, separate from thrombosis prophylaxis? • Is there a role for anti-platelet agents? • In cancer setting, what is optimal anticoagulation therapy for indications besides venous thrombosis? (i.e. mechanical valves, atrial fibrillation)? • Interaction of Thrombophilia in Patient and Tumor Progression?
  • 52.
    Effect of Malignancyon the Risk of Venous Thrombosis Depending on the Duration Between Diagnosis of Cancer and Venous Thrombosis Duration Between Malignancy Adjusted Odds Ratio and Venous Thrombosis (95% CI) No Malignancy 1.00 All Malignancies 4.3 (3.3-5.6) Time after index date (diagnosis) 0 to <3 mo 53.5 (8.6-334.3) >3 mo to <1 y 14.3 (5.8-35.2) >1 to <3 y 3.6 (2.0-6.5) >3 to <5 y 3.0 (1.5-5.7) >5 to <10 y 2.6 (1.4-4.7) >10 to <15 y 2.3 (0.9-5.8) >15 y 1.1 (0.6-2.2) Redrawn from Blom JW, et al. JAMA 2005;293(6):715-722.