The document provides an analysis of Artisan Partners (APAM) recommending a SELL with a price target of $29. The analysis cites three key business drivers negatively impacting APAM: 1) Limited growth opportunities due to passive investing trends and closed funds, 2) Declining fund performance impacting flows, and 3) High fees that require consistent outperformance. A DCF valuation estimates APAM's intrinsic value at $33, while relative valuations estimate $23-23.40. Weighting the methods gives a target price of $29, implying the stock is overvalued.
This document provides an analysis of Artisan Partners Asset Management (APAM). It discusses APAM's products, performance, ownership structure, and competitive positioning in the asset management industry. Some key points:
- APAM has approximately $97 billion in assets under management across 15 investment strategies. However, 75% of its AUM is in funds closed to new investors, limiting its growth potential.
- APAM's fund performance has been declining relative to peers, which could lead to lower inflows and pressure to reduce fees.
- The industry is seeing a shift toward lower-fee passive investments, which may compress fees for active managers like APAM.
- APAM derives most of its revenue from
The document discusses the total cost of risk (TCOR) and how captives are involved in calculating TCOR. It summarizes a panel discussion on TCOR that explored whether captives properly account for premiums and losses in their TCOR calculations. The panel included a risk manager, actuary, and survey representative who discussed different approaches to calculating TCOR and whether respondents track it. Most audience members did not track TCOR. The document then provides background on TCOR components and discusses three methods for calculating the loss component of TCOR. It also gives an example of how one company calculates and reports TCOR to management, showing captives can significantly impact TCOR calculations.
EOG Resources is an oil and gas exploration and production company. As of 2014, it had proved reserves of 2.5 billion barrels of oil equivalent located in the US and Trinidad. The report provides a risk assessment of EOG across five elements - creditworthiness, efficiency, profitability, inherent stability, and future prospects. It also includes an analysis of the company's valuation and assumptions used in the valuation model.
Hutchinson Whampoa's Harvard Case StudyLaini Tsang
Hutchinson Whampoa needed to raise $5 billion in capital over the next 5 years to fund growth projects. They were considering different financing options like debt and equity. Debt financing was preferable due to tax benefits, but high debt could hurt Hutchinson's credit rating. Equity financing risked diluting ownership. Issuing eurobonds in Japan offered lower interest rates than Hong Kong due to Japan's economic conditions. The summary recommends starting with smaller Yankee bond issues in the US to pave the way for future access to US capital markets.
The document analyzes different capital restructuring options for a company following a CEO retirement. It considers maintaining the current debt ratio of no change versus increasing to 30%, 50%, or 70% debt ratios. Increasing the debt ratio is estimated to create a tax shield that increases firm value and stock price, with 70% debt ratio estimated to maximize shareholder value. However, higher debt also increases financial risk and could lead to a bond rating downgrade, though it would still be investment grade.
This document summarizes a study on the determinants of capital structure in Thailand. The study analyzed data on 144 Thai listed companies from 2000 to 2011 to examine how firm-specific factors like size, profitability, asset tangibility, growth opportunities, and volatility influence a company's leverage ratios. The results showed that leverage ratios increased significantly with firm size but decreased significantly with profitability, in line with trade-off and pecking order theories. However, tangibility, growth, and volatility did not have significant relationships with leverage ratios. Therefore, the study concluded that firm size and profitability are the main determinants of capital structure for companies in Thailand.
The analyst recommends a hold rating for the stock with a price target of $67.49 based on a discounted cash flow valuation. Key points include:
- The company has a strong competitive position driven by economies of scale, differentiated products, and high switching costs for customers.
- Financial performance is superior with high margins, returns on equity, and a history of revenue and earnings growth.
- A discounted cash flow model incorporating revenue growth assumptions and margin expansion yields a fair value estimate of $67.49, supported by relative multiples and Benjamin Graham approaches.
- Risks include sensitivity to economic conditions, currency fluctuations, and achieving growth through acquisitions.
This chapter provides an overview of key concepts in financial management. It discusses the primary goal of maximizing shareholder value and agency relationships between shareholders, managers, and creditors. It also covers the importance of financial management skills for managers, factors that determine the value and cost of capital for firms, and types of financial securities and their typical rates of return.
This document provides an analysis of Artisan Partners Asset Management (APAM). It discusses APAM's products, performance, ownership structure, and competitive positioning in the asset management industry. Some key points:
- APAM has approximately $97 billion in assets under management across 15 investment strategies. However, 75% of its AUM is in funds closed to new investors, limiting its growth potential.
- APAM's fund performance has been declining relative to peers, which could lead to lower inflows and pressure to reduce fees.
- The industry is seeing a shift toward lower-fee passive investments, which may compress fees for active managers like APAM.
- APAM derives most of its revenue from
The document discusses the total cost of risk (TCOR) and how captives are involved in calculating TCOR. It summarizes a panel discussion on TCOR that explored whether captives properly account for premiums and losses in their TCOR calculations. The panel included a risk manager, actuary, and survey representative who discussed different approaches to calculating TCOR and whether respondents track it. Most audience members did not track TCOR. The document then provides background on TCOR components and discusses three methods for calculating the loss component of TCOR. It also gives an example of how one company calculates and reports TCOR to management, showing captives can significantly impact TCOR calculations.
EOG Resources is an oil and gas exploration and production company. As of 2014, it had proved reserves of 2.5 billion barrels of oil equivalent located in the US and Trinidad. The report provides a risk assessment of EOG across five elements - creditworthiness, efficiency, profitability, inherent stability, and future prospects. It also includes an analysis of the company's valuation and assumptions used in the valuation model.
Hutchinson Whampoa's Harvard Case StudyLaini Tsang
Hutchinson Whampoa needed to raise $5 billion in capital over the next 5 years to fund growth projects. They were considering different financing options like debt and equity. Debt financing was preferable due to tax benefits, but high debt could hurt Hutchinson's credit rating. Equity financing risked diluting ownership. Issuing eurobonds in Japan offered lower interest rates than Hong Kong due to Japan's economic conditions. The summary recommends starting with smaller Yankee bond issues in the US to pave the way for future access to US capital markets.
The document analyzes different capital restructuring options for a company following a CEO retirement. It considers maintaining the current debt ratio of no change versus increasing to 30%, 50%, or 70% debt ratios. Increasing the debt ratio is estimated to create a tax shield that increases firm value and stock price, with 70% debt ratio estimated to maximize shareholder value. However, higher debt also increases financial risk and could lead to a bond rating downgrade, though it would still be investment grade.
This document summarizes a study on the determinants of capital structure in Thailand. The study analyzed data on 144 Thai listed companies from 2000 to 2011 to examine how firm-specific factors like size, profitability, asset tangibility, growth opportunities, and volatility influence a company's leverage ratios. The results showed that leverage ratios increased significantly with firm size but decreased significantly with profitability, in line with trade-off and pecking order theories. However, tangibility, growth, and volatility did not have significant relationships with leverage ratios. Therefore, the study concluded that firm size and profitability are the main determinants of capital structure for companies in Thailand.
The analyst recommends a hold rating for the stock with a price target of $67.49 based on a discounted cash flow valuation. Key points include:
- The company has a strong competitive position driven by economies of scale, differentiated products, and high switching costs for customers.
- Financial performance is superior with high margins, returns on equity, and a history of revenue and earnings growth.
- A discounted cash flow model incorporating revenue growth assumptions and margin expansion yields a fair value estimate of $67.49, supported by relative multiples and Benjamin Graham approaches.
- Risks include sensitivity to economic conditions, currency fluctuations, and achieving growth through acquisitions.
This chapter provides an overview of key concepts in financial management. It discusses the primary goal of maximizing shareholder value and agency relationships between shareholders, managers, and creditors. It also covers the importance of financial management skills for managers, factors that determine the value and cost of capital for firms, and types of financial securities and their typical rates of return.
The document discusses executive compensation practices at banks and financial institutions. It covers issues like pay freezes, incentive pay, performance metrics, restrictions on TARP recipients, calls for increased transparency and shareholder votes on compensation. It provides advice on selecting appropriate performance measures and ensuring compensation is tied to achieving goals.
American home products corporation copynandia_1113
American Home Products faces low business risk as it operates in stable food and consumer product industries. Using 30% debt would allow it to save on taxes, repurchase shares, and increase its stock price while maintaining a strong credit rating similar to competitors. This capital structure balances the advantages of leverage with maintaining prudent levels of financial risk given AHP's conservative culture. Mr. Laporte should adopt this recommendation to increase shareholder value through tax savings and higher stock prices while keeping risk at a manageable level.
A corporation finances itself through a combination of equity and debt. The capital structure should be designed to maximize the long-term market valuation of the firm. The determinants of a company's capital structure include the type of assets financed, the nature of the industry, the degree of competition, potential for obsolescence, the product life cycle stage, financial policies, past capital structure decisions, issues of corporate control, and credit ratings.
IMF is a global leader in litigation funding, with a $1.5 billion litigation portfolio and a track record of winning 78% of cases. Litigation funding provides portfolio diversification and is not correlated with economic cycles. IMF trades at a discount to its $1.96 blended valuation, offering upside potential from case wins and portfolio growth. Key value drivers are the size of the litigation portfolio, IMF's high win rate, and the duration of its cases.
1. The document provides financial information about a company including its capital structure, long-term debt instruments, preferred stock, and common stock.
2. Key figures given include annual revenues of $9 billion, a capital structure of 34% long-term debt, 3% preferred stock, and 63% common stock. Details are provided on two long-term debt instruments, the preferred stock, and the common stock.
3. The document poses 10 questions asking the reader to calculate various metrics like yield and required rate of return based on the information provided, and to evaluate whether investments in the company's bonds and stock would be recommended.
In this paper we propose a new risk management framework that can evaluate the cost-risk tradeoff of alternative risk management strategies. Although there is ample theoretical support for risk management as an activity, common risk management approaches suffer serious problems:
Minimize Risk: Completely eliminating risk is expensive and impractical
Efficient Frontier: Can eliminate many poor risk management strategies but rarely gives a definitive optimal
strategy
Sharpe Ratio: Provides a cost-risk trade-off but the price of one unit of risk is arbitrary
Based on a recent empirical study, we propose a new cost-risk measure which directly values the impact of earnings per share and cash flow per share volatility.
This new approach will enable corporate CFOs and treasurers to make more robust risk management decisions and, critically, better defend those decisions internally and to the broader market.
- Federated Investors faces significant challenges from potential new regulations for money market funds proposed by the SEC chairman, as money market funds comprise 75% of Federated's total assets under management.
- New rules could lead to large outflows from money market funds, negatively impacting Federated's earnings. Despite some positive flows and fund performance, the risks to Federated's core business are substantial.
- The analyst initiates coverage of Federated with an Underperform rating and $19 price target, seeing limited upside due to risks from money market reforms and the stock trading in line with peers despite these risks.
Thomson Financial analyzed 75 recent instances of shareholder activism and found mixed results regarding the impact on stock price. Stocks targeted by activists showed higher returns after the activism in both short and long-term, but the results were not always statistically significant. Certain sectors like consumer discretionary were more frequent targets. Activists achieved at least one of their demands 45% of the time, with the highest success rate of nearly 80% for demands to remove the CEO. Stocks of targeted companies outperformed a control group after activism, suggesting shareholder monitoring leads to positive changes. However, the prominence rather than just substance of activism may influence stock prices.
1) Distressed investing provides opportunities for double-digit returns over the next 2-4 years due to high default rates from debt maturities, excess corporate leverage, and ongoing economic weakness.
2) Distressed funds invest in securities of financially distressed companies and aim to profit from improvements or extracting value through bankruptcy. Successful managers have industry expertise, strong analytics, restructuring experience, and relationships.
3) Distressed funds fall into the "return enhancer" category, providing moderate to high returns with some protection against downturns compared to stocks and bonds. Significant opportunities exist over the next few years as over $1 trillion in debt matures amid limited refinancing options.
This document discusses pension risk to corporate sponsors from three perspectives: scale, impact, and risk. It provides examples measuring a UK company's pension exposure compared to industry medians across these dimensions. Metrics examined include liabilities/deficit as a percentage of market capitalization, impact on debt ratios, and risk measures like value-at-risk and contributions-at-risk. The document advocates developing a pension risk management framework to guide investment strategy in line with the sponsor's objectives and constraints. It also discusses incorporating sponsor credit risk into funding projections from the trustee perspective.
This document contains financial information for Delta Airlines, including its capital structure, ownership structure, dividend policy, and key financial ratios. It also provides details on Delta's business model as an airline operating in the air transportation industry, along with inherent risks in the industry. The summary is:
Delta Airlines operates as an airline providing scheduled air transportation. It has a capital intensive business model with high fixed costs and risks including economic downturns, fuel price fluctuations, and safety concerns. The company is majority owned by institutions and uses debt financing. It recently initiated a dividend policy and share buybacks to return cash to shareholders.
IDCFP’s CAMEL Ranks Explained - The “E” in CAMEL: Earnings ReturnsJohn Rickmeier
IDC Financial Publishing, Inc. (IDCFP) utilizes the acronym CAMEL to represent the financial ratios used to evaluate the safety and soundness of commercial banks, savings institutions and credit unions. This article explains how IDCFP uses earnings returns as a key component of its CAMEL ranking system, and why it is valuable and important to monitor.
Brookside Energy Ltd is an Australian publicly traded company that focuses on oil and gas exploration and production in the United States. The company has established relationships in the oil and gas sector over the past 10 years. According to its financial statements for the period ending June 2015, Brookside saw decreases in current assets and non-current assets compared to the prior period. It also saw an increase in current liabilities. Overall, the company's equity decreased substantially from the prior period, suggesting it paid off shares and had difficulty obtaining funds from the market.
1. The document discusses factors that affect a company's dividend policy, including stability of earnings, the age of the corporation, liquidity of funds, extent of share distribution, needs for additional capital, trade cycles, and government policies.
2. Key factors mentioned are the nature of the business, availability of cash, ownership structure, financing requirements for expansion, business cycles, and changes in government regulations.
3. Stable earnings allow companies to more consistently predict savings and earnings to set dividend policy, while new companies often retain more earnings for expansion and older companies can establish clearer policies.
This document provides information about obtaining fully solved assignments from an assignment help service. It lists their email and phone contact information and requests students to send their semester and specialization when reaching out. It then provides a sample assignment for financial management that covers topics like calculating tax liability for a corporation, objectives of income tax, investment analysis based on risk and return, diversification and its impact on risk, and financial forecasting. The document provides guidance on calculating various financial ratios for McDonald's and solving inventory management problems. It asks students to explain concepts like issues in international business, financial axioms, and the risk-return tradeoff.
This survey summarizes trends in executive remuneration practices among South African companies over three years. Five key trends are identified: 1) Shareholders, especially institutional investors, have become more active in influencing executive pay; 2) Remuneration committees are engaging more with shareholders and making changes to pay programs as a result; 3) Committees continue focusing on linking pay to performance; 4) Financial metrics dominate incentive plans rather than non-financial metrics; 5) Committees now seek over 70% shareholder support for remuneration policies, seeing a 30% dissenting vote as a rejection.
The document discusses the cost of capital and how it relates to a firm's capital structure. It defines cost of capital as the minimum return a firm must earn on an investment to justify undertaking the project. It then explains weighted average cost of capital (WACC), which weights the cost of equity and debt based on their proportions of a firm's total capital. WACC depends on the use of funds rather than their source. The document also discusses how to calculate costs of equity, debt, and WACC, and notes firms can potentially lower their WACC and increase value by optimizing their debt-to-equity ratio through financial leverage. However, increased financial risk must also be considered.
Financials_FFH.TO_Hold_03_02_2015-3 (FInal Version)Alfredo Leon
The document provides an analysis of ACE Limited (TSX: FFH.TO) by the Babson College Fund Financials Sector Team. Key points include:
1) FFH.TO is rated "HOLD" with a price target of $699.97, representing potential upside of 6.7% from its current price of $656. The company has a unique investment philosophy and niche insurance products.
2) Strengths include improved underwriting results, uncorrelated market returns providing portfolio hedging, a diversified investment portfolio, and consistent book value growth. However, more analysis is needed due to current price uncertainty.
3) Risks include natural catastrophes, liquidity
WSJ Hay Group 2014 CEO compensation studySteve Sabow
- CEO pay increased in 2014, with total compensation rising 4.1% to $3.7 million and long-term incentive grants increasing 5.6% to $8.1 million. Companies made changes to pay mixes, increasing the portion tied to performance in response to shareholder feedback.
- Shareholder returns were strong in 2013 and solid in 2014, with total shareholder returns of 34.6% and 16.6% respectively. Company financial performance also increased, contributing to higher CEO pay.
- Shareholders continue to prefer more compensation being tied to long-term performance, leading to performance awards becoming the largest part of the pay mix for CEOs.
The document is a three page article from the Post Magazine published on August 13, 2009. It discusses the Capita Group, a British outsourcing and professional services company. The article provides metadata about the source, page numbers, area, and circulation for the magazine issue. It also notes copyright restrictions for the cutting.
Las vitaminas son substancias químicas no sintetizables por el organismo, presentes en pequeñas cantidades en los alimentos y son indispensables para la vida, la salud, la actividad física y cotidiana.
Intervienen como catalizador en las reacciones bioquímicas provocando la liberación de energía. En otras palabras, la función de las vitaminas es la de facilitar la transformación que siguen los sustratos a través de las vías metabólicas.
The document discusses executive compensation practices at banks and financial institutions. It covers issues like pay freezes, incentive pay, performance metrics, restrictions on TARP recipients, calls for increased transparency and shareholder votes on compensation. It provides advice on selecting appropriate performance measures and ensuring compensation is tied to achieving goals.
American home products corporation copynandia_1113
American Home Products faces low business risk as it operates in stable food and consumer product industries. Using 30% debt would allow it to save on taxes, repurchase shares, and increase its stock price while maintaining a strong credit rating similar to competitors. This capital structure balances the advantages of leverage with maintaining prudent levels of financial risk given AHP's conservative culture. Mr. Laporte should adopt this recommendation to increase shareholder value through tax savings and higher stock prices while keeping risk at a manageable level.
A corporation finances itself through a combination of equity and debt. The capital structure should be designed to maximize the long-term market valuation of the firm. The determinants of a company's capital structure include the type of assets financed, the nature of the industry, the degree of competition, potential for obsolescence, the product life cycle stage, financial policies, past capital structure decisions, issues of corporate control, and credit ratings.
IMF is a global leader in litigation funding, with a $1.5 billion litigation portfolio and a track record of winning 78% of cases. Litigation funding provides portfolio diversification and is not correlated with economic cycles. IMF trades at a discount to its $1.96 blended valuation, offering upside potential from case wins and portfolio growth. Key value drivers are the size of the litigation portfolio, IMF's high win rate, and the duration of its cases.
1. The document provides financial information about a company including its capital structure, long-term debt instruments, preferred stock, and common stock.
2. Key figures given include annual revenues of $9 billion, a capital structure of 34% long-term debt, 3% preferred stock, and 63% common stock. Details are provided on two long-term debt instruments, the preferred stock, and the common stock.
3. The document poses 10 questions asking the reader to calculate various metrics like yield and required rate of return based on the information provided, and to evaluate whether investments in the company's bonds and stock would be recommended.
In this paper we propose a new risk management framework that can evaluate the cost-risk tradeoff of alternative risk management strategies. Although there is ample theoretical support for risk management as an activity, common risk management approaches suffer serious problems:
Minimize Risk: Completely eliminating risk is expensive and impractical
Efficient Frontier: Can eliminate many poor risk management strategies but rarely gives a definitive optimal
strategy
Sharpe Ratio: Provides a cost-risk trade-off but the price of one unit of risk is arbitrary
Based on a recent empirical study, we propose a new cost-risk measure which directly values the impact of earnings per share and cash flow per share volatility.
This new approach will enable corporate CFOs and treasurers to make more robust risk management decisions and, critically, better defend those decisions internally and to the broader market.
- Federated Investors faces significant challenges from potential new regulations for money market funds proposed by the SEC chairman, as money market funds comprise 75% of Federated's total assets under management.
- New rules could lead to large outflows from money market funds, negatively impacting Federated's earnings. Despite some positive flows and fund performance, the risks to Federated's core business are substantial.
- The analyst initiates coverage of Federated with an Underperform rating and $19 price target, seeing limited upside due to risks from money market reforms and the stock trading in line with peers despite these risks.
Thomson Financial analyzed 75 recent instances of shareholder activism and found mixed results regarding the impact on stock price. Stocks targeted by activists showed higher returns after the activism in both short and long-term, but the results were not always statistically significant. Certain sectors like consumer discretionary were more frequent targets. Activists achieved at least one of their demands 45% of the time, with the highest success rate of nearly 80% for demands to remove the CEO. Stocks of targeted companies outperformed a control group after activism, suggesting shareholder monitoring leads to positive changes. However, the prominence rather than just substance of activism may influence stock prices.
1) Distressed investing provides opportunities for double-digit returns over the next 2-4 years due to high default rates from debt maturities, excess corporate leverage, and ongoing economic weakness.
2) Distressed funds invest in securities of financially distressed companies and aim to profit from improvements or extracting value through bankruptcy. Successful managers have industry expertise, strong analytics, restructuring experience, and relationships.
3) Distressed funds fall into the "return enhancer" category, providing moderate to high returns with some protection against downturns compared to stocks and bonds. Significant opportunities exist over the next few years as over $1 trillion in debt matures amid limited refinancing options.
This document discusses pension risk to corporate sponsors from three perspectives: scale, impact, and risk. It provides examples measuring a UK company's pension exposure compared to industry medians across these dimensions. Metrics examined include liabilities/deficit as a percentage of market capitalization, impact on debt ratios, and risk measures like value-at-risk and contributions-at-risk. The document advocates developing a pension risk management framework to guide investment strategy in line with the sponsor's objectives and constraints. It also discusses incorporating sponsor credit risk into funding projections from the trustee perspective.
This document contains financial information for Delta Airlines, including its capital structure, ownership structure, dividend policy, and key financial ratios. It also provides details on Delta's business model as an airline operating in the air transportation industry, along with inherent risks in the industry. The summary is:
Delta Airlines operates as an airline providing scheduled air transportation. It has a capital intensive business model with high fixed costs and risks including economic downturns, fuel price fluctuations, and safety concerns. The company is majority owned by institutions and uses debt financing. It recently initiated a dividend policy and share buybacks to return cash to shareholders.
IDCFP’s CAMEL Ranks Explained - The “E” in CAMEL: Earnings ReturnsJohn Rickmeier
IDC Financial Publishing, Inc. (IDCFP) utilizes the acronym CAMEL to represent the financial ratios used to evaluate the safety and soundness of commercial banks, savings institutions and credit unions. This article explains how IDCFP uses earnings returns as a key component of its CAMEL ranking system, and why it is valuable and important to monitor.
Brookside Energy Ltd is an Australian publicly traded company that focuses on oil and gas exploration and production in the United States. The company has established relationships in the oil and gas sector over the past 10 years. According to its financial statements for the period ending June 2015, Brookside saw decreases in current assets and non-current assets compared to the prior period. It also saw an increase in current liabilities. Overall, the company's equity decreased substantially from the prior period, suggesting it paid off shares and had difficulty obtaining funds from the market.
1. The document discusses factors that affect a company's dividend policy, including stability of earnings, the age of the corporation, liquidity of funds, extent of share distribution, needs for additional capital, trade cycles, and government policies.
2. Key factors mentioned are the nature of the business, availability of cash, ownership structure, financing requirements for expansion, business cycles, and changes in government regulations.
3. Stable earnings allow companies to more consistently predict savings and earnings to set dividend policy, while new companies often retain more earnings for expansion and older companies can establish clearer policies.
This document provides information about obtaining fully solved assignments from an assignment help service. It lists their email and phone contact information and requests students to send their semester and specialization when reaching out. It then provides a sample assignment for financial management that covers topics like calculating tax liability for a corporation, objectives of income tax, investment analysis based on risk and return, diversification and its impact on risk, and financial forecasting. The document provides guidance on calculating various financial ratios for McDonald's and solving inventory management problems. It asks students to explain concepts like issues in international business, financial axioms, and the risk-return tradeoff.
This survey summarizes trends in executive remuneration practices among South African companies over three years. Five key trends are identified: 1) Shareholders, especially institutional investors, have become more active in influencing executive pay; 2) Remuneration committees are engaging more with shareholders and making changes to pay programs as a result; 3) Committees continue focusing on linking pay to performance; 4) Financial metrics dominate incentive plans rather than non-financial metrics; 5) Committees now seek over 70% shareholder support for remuneration policies, seeing a 30% dissenting vote as a rejection.
The document discusses the cost of capital and how it relates to a firm's capital structure. It defines cost of capital as the minimum return a firm must earn on an investment to justify undertaking the project. It then explains weighted average cost of capital (WACC), which weights the cost of equity and debt based on their proportions of a firm's total capital. WACC depends on the use of funds rather than their source. The document also discusses how to calculate costs of equity, debt, and WACC, and notes firms can potentially lower their WACC and increase value by optimizing their debt-to-equity ratio through financial leverage. However, increased financial risk must also be considered.
Financials_FFH.TO_Hold_03_02_2015-3 (FInal Version)Alfredo Leon
The document provides an analysis of ACE Limited (TSX: FFH.TO) by the Babson College Fund Financials Sector Team. Key points include:
1) FFH.TO is rated "HOLD" with a price target of $699.97, representing potential upside of 6.7% from its current price of $656. The company has a unique investment philosophy and niche insurance products.
2) Strengths include improved underwriting results, uncorrelated market returns providing portfolio hedging, a diversified investment portfolio, and consistent book value growth. However, more analysis is needed due to current price uncertainty.
3) Risks include natural catastrophes, liquidity
WSJ Hay Group 2014 CEO compensation studySteve Sabow
- CEO pay increased in 2014, with total compensation rising 4.1% to $3.7 million and long-term incentive grants increasing 5.6% to $8.1 million. Companies made changes to pay mixes, increasing the portion tied to performance in response to shareholder feedback.
- Shareholder returns were strong in 2013 and solid in 2014, with total shareholder returns of 34.6% and 16.6% respectively. Company financial performance also increased, contributing to higher CEO pay.
- Shareholders continue to prefer more compensation being tied to long-term performance, leading to performance awards becoming the largest part of the pay mix for CEOs.
The document is a three page article from the Post Magazine published on August 13, 2009. It discusses the Capita Group, a British outsourcing and professional services company. The article provides metadata about the source, page numbers, area, and circulation for the magazine issue. It also notes copyright restrictions for the cutting.
Las vitaminas son substancias químicas no sintetizables por el organismo, presentes en pequeñas cantidades en los alimentos y son indispensables para la vida, la salud, la actividad física y cotidiana.
Intervienen como catalizador en las reacciones bioquímicas provocando la liberación de energía. En otras palabras, la función de las vitaminas es la de facilitar la transformación que siguen los sustratos a través de las vías metabólicas.
Salim Diakite is seeking part-time employment and has experience in customer service roles such as counseling children, supervising basketball courts, and dispatching cars. He has a high school diploma from John F. Kennedy High School and is currently studying psychology at Mercy College. Salim has strong computer skills including Microsoft Word and intermediate skills in Excel and PowerPoint. He also has experience supervising others and ensuring clean and safe facilities.
Georg Cantor developed set theory and discovered that there are different sizes of infinity. He proved that the set of real numbers is uncountably infinite, meaning its cardinality is greater than that of the natural numbers. This was surprising as previously the natural numbers, integers, and rational numbers were all shown to have the same countably infinite cardinality. Cantor introduced the concept of bijective mappings between sets to determine if they have the same cardinality. He used diagonalization to show that no bijection exists between the real numbers and natural numbers, proving the real numbers have a larger infinity. This challenged the views of mathematicians at the time and established foundational ideas in set theory.
Este documento presenta un plan de negocio para una nueva empresa consultora de energías renovables llamada iSolar. La empresa ofrecerá servicios de consultoría, instalación y mantenimiento de sistemas solares térmicos y fotovoltaicos. El documento describe la forma jurídica de la empresa, los productos y servicios que ofrecerá, el mercado objetivo, la competencia, estrategias, costes, objetivos financieros y comerciales, y recursos necesarios para poner en marcha con éxito la empresa.
This 3-year project between Riverside School Board and McGill University aims to enhance the teaching and learning of mathematics using technology. The goals are for teachers to engage in ongoing professional learning to benefit student learning, and to use student data to monitor progress. Key activities over the 3 years include face-to-face meetings, online discussions, classroom visits, and developing practices around using digital tools and video-based lessons. The project aims to foster collaboration and develop teachers' digital literacy skills to improve students' mathematical understanding.
This document outlines the agenda and objectives for a project meeting focused on creating, collaborating and computing in mathematics. The agenda includes analyzing student data from exams, sharing strategies and experiences, and reviewing strategies seen in the project. Key themes of the project include student success, digital literacy, and using data to monitor practice. Objectives for the current year focus on developing a community of practice, measuring results, and promoting reflective practice. A key activity is using video-based reflection. The meeting will include small group work analyzing data to identify student learning problems and their causes.
Der OMG-Standard CMMN fokussiert sich auf die Unterstützung unstrukturierter Aktivitäten (Case Management). Mit Camunda BPM 7.6 wird CMMN sowohl in der technischen Ausführung als auch im Echzeit-Monitoring noch besser unterstützt.
Camunda-Mitgründer Bernd Rücker demonstrierte diese neuen Möglichkeiten live und erklärte, wie Sie von CMMN profitieren können.
This document outlines the agenda for a meeting between the Riverside School Board and McGill University about their project to enhance math teaching and learning through technology. The key themes of the project are student success in math, digital literacy, focusing on transitions from elementary to secondary school, professional learning networks, and using data to monitor practice. The objectives for the current year are to cultivate a community of practice around math and technology, develop and evaluate solutions, promote reflective teaching practices, and consolidate the partnership between the organizations. The agenda includes discussions of challenges, teaching strategies, video reflections, group work, and online collaboration.
This document summarizes a meeting between the Riverside School Board and McGill University to discuss enhancing mathematics teaching and learning through technology. The agenda includes sharing teaching strategies, reviewing research on strategies like math journals and open-ended tasks, co-planning a rich mathematical task aligned to a learning target, and discussing formative assessment. Group norms are established like remaining on task and respecting peers. The goal is to collaboratively design lessons integrating technology and the discussed strategies.
Seguridad en los procedimientos invasivos - CICAT-SALUDCICAT SALUD
Este documento trata sobre la seguridad de los pacientes en procedimientos invasivos y no invasivos. Describe la importancia de la gestión de riesgos y la prevención de infecciones asociadas a catéteres, incluyendo la higiene de manos, la antisepsia de la piel, el uso de medidas de barrera y la selección adecuada del lugar de inserción del catéter. También discute el cuidado y mantenimiento de los catéteres, incluyendo el cambio de apósitos y la retirada oportuna de
Financial Analysis: Kraft Foods Inc. (KFT)Yaw Ofosu
This document provides an analysis of Kraft Foods Inc. (KFT) including its background, financial ratios, projections, financing, capital structure, dividend policy, stock value, analyst opinions, and recommendation. Kraft is the largest food company in the US and world's 2nd largest, with $49.21B in revenue and operations in over 75 countries. The analysis finds KFT has a low risk capital structure and cost of capital of 6.15%. While the current stock price is $31.16, the dividend discount and total corporate value models value the stock at $83.95 and $36.99 respectively. Based on Kraft's strengths and growth opportunities, the recommendation is to buy the stock.
CEO Pay: A Middle Market Perspective, presented to the Minneapolis-St. Paul NASPP Chapter on March 27, 2014.
Executive compensation has continued to evolve in recent years. Companies are increasingly required to balance the need for competitive pay with the need to respond to increased scrutiny, particularly with regard to the relationship between pay and performance.
To provide some insight and perspective, Buck Consultants has recently completed a study of executive compensation practices and trends in the middle market. In this study, Buck analyzed total direct compensation for Chief Executive Officers in companies listed on the S&P 400 MidCap Index.
In this presentation, we will discuss our findings with regard to both current practices and trends for CEO pay in these Mid-Cap companies. Because long-term incentives typically comprised the largest portion of executive compensation, our study focused on prevalence, mix, usage and design of equity vehicles. Finally, we will look at governance issues, including corporate governance concerns and the degree of alignment between pay and performance.
We recommend Cintas Corporation as a HOLD with a 12-month price target of $81, representing an upside of 0.77% from the current price of $81.32. Key factors leading to a neutral outlook include limited opportunities for organic growth, continued emphasis on cross-selling and acquisitions to improve margins, and an aggressive capital return plan including share buybacks.
This document provides an overview of a company presentation for CFA Institute Research Challenge. Key points include:
- The presentation was made by a team from Canisius College in Buffalo, NY for the Americas Competition in Atlanta, GA.
- An analysis is provided of Sovran Self Storage (SSS), the 4th largest self-storage company in the US, including its industry, competitive positioning, financials, valuation, and risks.
- Valuation methods employed include DCF analysis using Monte Carlo simulation, relative multiples comparison, and a price target is determined to be $96 per share, indicating a small upside from the current price.
This document provides an overview of a company presentation for a self-storage REIT called SSS for the CFA Institute Research Challenge. The presentation includes sections on the company overview, industry analysis, financial analysis, valuation, and risks. Key points include that SSS is the 4th largest self-storage company in the US, derives 92% of revenue from rental income, and has over 500 properties. The valuation ranges from $96-98.81 based on DCF, EV/EBITDA, and P/FFO multiples. Risks include concentration risk, loss of credit rating, and rising interest rates. The conclusion is to hold SSS based on its experienced management and tailwinds, but also concerns around
Cleveland Research Company 2016 Stock Pitch Competition- Tempur Selay Finalist Alexander Liscum
One of 5 finalists chosen out of 25 competitive teams to present to equity research professionals in the 2016 CRC Stock Pitch Competition at Miami University.
Fin 340 Fall 2014Instructor Lawrence A. SouzaYa.docxmydrynan
Fin 340 Fall 2014
Instructor: Lawrence A. Souza
Yanzhuo (Crystal) Jiang
Kushal Parikh
Yang Jiang
Stock Valuation: BUY
Intrinsic Value: $22.01 > Current Price: $17.22
Overview
Bank of America Background
Financial Conditions
Stock Valuation
Recommendation
Background
Banking and financial services corporation, founded in 1904, headquartered in Charlotte, North Carolina
2nd largest bank holding company by assets in the US
Serves more than 50 million consumers and small businesses worldwide, with revenues of over $100 B in 2013
Employs more than 245,000 people in the US
Product & Service
Consumer & Business Banking
Consumer Real Estate Services
Global Wealth & Investment Management
Global Banking
Global Markets
Leadership
Bank Ranking by Total Assets RankInstitution Name06/30/2014 Total Assets1JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.$2,520,3362BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION$2,172,001 3CITIGROUP INC.$1,909,715 4WELLS FARGO & COMPANY$1,598,874 5GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC.$860,008 6MORGAN STANLEY$826, 568
Source: ffiec.gov
S.W.O.TStrengths
Increasing total deposits will result in better returns
Strong banking network will increase efficiencies
Impressive financial performance enhance investor confidenceWeakness
Many lawsuits against the firm may affect its performance and brand image
Lawsuits were filed by US justice department and SEC over the bank lying to its investors Opportunities
Positive US cards payments channel due to stable economic conditions and mobile commerce popularity
New products and services like CashPro BillPay, Cash360 will help drive performance
Threats
Fluctuations in interest rates may affect the bank’s performance
Compliance costs may continue to grow due to additional regulations as a result of the financial crisis
Financial ConditionFinancial RatiosBOAWells FargoPeersIndustryConditionsProfitability
RatiosNet Profit Margin%11.324.917.816.7Below AverageROA%0.51.40.80.5AverageROE%4.614.08.47.9Below AverageLeverage RatiosDebt to Equity1.14x1.2x1.3x0.7xAverageInterest Coverage1.5x8.4x3.6x7.3xBelow AverageOverallAverage to Below Average
Source: morningtar.com
Financial ConditionFinancial RatiosBOAWells FargoPeersIndustryConditionsEquity RatiosP/E20.6x12.6x14.9x15.4xGoodDividend Payout%4.630.017.12.3Below AverageGrowth
(Year to Year)Revenue %6.7(2.7)3.12.2GoodOperating Income %426.414.6144.146.2ExcellentNet Income %173.015.863.653.3ExcellentEPS %260.015.884.461.1ExcellentOverallAverage to Good
Source: morningtar.com, csimarket.com
Valuation: Perpetuity Model
Formula: PV= Earning per share / R EquityCAPM ModelRisk Free Rate2.3%Beta1.8Expected Market Return7%R Equity11%201220132014EEPS $ 0.25 0.91.2
Source: morningtar.com, cnbc.com
CF: Cash Flow per share in the Last Individual Year Estimated; R: Return on Equity;
Stock Value = $1.2 / 11% = $10.91 < Current Price = $ 17.22R EquityStock Value $Range9%13.33High11%10.91Medium13%9.23Low
Valuation: Gordon Growth Model
Formula: PV= Expected Earn ...
Investing Concept Of Risk And Return PowerPoint Presentation Slides SlideTeam
Every organization needs to adapt to the ever-changing business environment. Sensing this need, we have come up with these content-ready change management PowerPoint presentation slides. These change management PPT templates will help you deal with any kind of an organizational change. Be it with people, goals or processes. The business solutions incorporated here will help you identify the organizational structure, create vision for change, implement strategies, identify resistance and risk, manage cost of change, get feedback and evaluation, and much more. With the help of various change management tools and techniques illustrated in this presentation design, you can achieve the desired business outcomes. This business transition PowerPoint design also covers certain related topics such as change model, transformation strategy, change readiness, change control, project management and business process. By implementing the change control methods mentioned in the presentation, you will be able to have a smooth transition in an organization. So, without waiting much, download our extensively researched change management framework presentation. With our Change Management Presentation slides, understand the need for change and plan to go through it without any hassles.
Stock Pitch For Construction Companies PowerPoint Presentation PPT Slide Temp...SlideTeam
Our Stock Pitch For Construction Companies PowerPoint Presentation Ppt Slide Template is the perfect way to pitch your stock. We have researched thousands of stock pitches and designed the most impactful way to convince your investors to invest in your equity. http://bit.ly/3bCBH5o
This document contains an analysis of Capital One Financial Corporation (COF) stock. It begins with an agenda and macroeconomic review using various data sources. It then reviews COF's industry, business segments, and financial performance. Assumptions are made for projections of COF's income statement and balance sheet from 2015-2019. Comparable company analyses and valuation models like the dividend discount model are used to derive an implied share price of $84, indicating the stock is undervalued.
This document provides an analysis of Southwest Airlines (LUV) and makes the recommendation to HOLD the stock. It summarizes LUV's business model, competitive advantages, financial performance, and valuation. While LUV previously had a cost advantage due to its low-cost point-to-point structure, the analysis finds this advantage has diminished as other carriers have adopted similar models. It also notes concerns around LUV's strained employee relations and upcoming union negotiations which could increase costs. Based on the valuation methods used, the analysis sees 8% downside for LUV's stock price.
Southwest Airlines has a current stock price of $37.54 per share and the analyst assigns a target price of $34.53, representing an 8% downside. While Southwest once had a competitive advantage due to its low cost structure, this advantage has diminished as other carriers have improved their own cost efficiency. Employee relations have also become strained as the company negotiates new contracts with five unionized work groups. Despite recent fuel cost savings, the analyst believes Southwest's fading competitive position and labor uncertainties warrant a HOLD recommendation on the stock.
- Phillips 66 Partners LP owns, operates, develops and acquires primarily fee-based crude oil, refined petroleum products and natural gas liquids pipelines and terminals and other midstream assets.
- PSXP has a balanced portfolio of assets with long-term, fee-based contracts providing stable cash flows. Recent acquisitions and organic growth projects will further expand the portfolio.
- PSXP is targeting 30% annual distribution growth through 2018 while maintaining investment grade credit ratings and annual distribution coverage of at least 1.1x.
This document provides an analysis of Rice Midstream Partners LP (RMP) conducted by Nathan Judge, CFA of Janney Montgomery Scott LLC. It recommends buying RMP based on its attractive 5.1% yield that is expected to grow over 25% annually through 2017, making it the top performer in the covered universe. Key points include RMP's low-risk growth profile requiring little capital, improving returns on capital, and undervalued unit price given its yield and growth relative to peers. The initiation report provides an overview of RMP's business, financial forecasts, valuation, and risks.
Baker Hill Prosper 2017 - Anatomy of a Profitable Loan: Before and After You ...Baker Hill
presented by John Robertson and co-presented by Christie Behrens of Allegiance Bank
Borrowers have enjoyed the benefits of a low interest rate environment but with rates beginning to creep up, a financial institution must price effectively by valuing the whole relationship to grow. You can be ahead of your competition by understanding the anatomy of a loan before and after you close.
SFW - FOFA implications, Sum of parts valuation, possible acquirers George Gabriel
This research note analyses potential acquirer of the SFW business, and looks at Future of Financial Advice (FOFA) reforms and values SFW on a sum of the parts basis (a relevant valuation methodology for any business with multiple business segments).
Financial services sector - implications of FOFA, possible acquires of SFW, S...George Gabriel
SFW Australia is rated positively given its scarcity value as one of two listed vertically integrated wealth managers in Australia. The stock offers upside for strategic acquirers at its current sum-of-parts valuation of 42 cents per share. Potential acquirers include regional banks, third tier lenders, trustee companies, and diversified wealth managers seeking to expand their distribution networks and mitigate key person risks. The deferral of mandatory FOFA reforms to 2013 will drive further sector consolidation as smaller players exit and larger players pursue acquisitions.
Portfolio Risk And Return Analysis PowerPoint Presentation Slides SlideTeam
Presenting this set of slides with name - Portfolio Risk And Return Analysis Powerpoint Presentation Slides. Enhance your audiences knowledge with this well researched complete deck. Showcase all the important features of the deck with perfect visuals. This deck comprises of total of twenty nine slides with each slide explained in detail. Each template comprises of professional diagrams and layouts. Our professional PowerPoint experts have also included icons, graphs and charts for your convenience. All you have to do is DOWNLOAD the deck. Make changes as per the requirement. Yes, these PPT slides are completely customizable. Edit the colour, text and font size. Add or delete the content from the slide. And leave your audience awestruck with the professionally designed Portfolio Risk And Return Analysis Powerpoint Presentation Slides complete deck.
This document provides information about Phillips 66's 2016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on May 4, 2016 in Houston, TX. It includes highlights from 2015 such as donating over $22 million to education and charities and hiring 25% of new refining employees as veterans. The presentation discusses Phillips 66's strategy of operational excellence, growth, returns, and having a high-performing organization. Financial details are provided on adjusted EBITDA, capital expenditures, returns on capital employed, and shareholder distributions through dividends and share repurchases.
Risk And Return Relationship PowerPoint Presentation SlidesSlideTeam
While building a diversified portfolio it is important to balance risk and returns, plan your investment strategy with our content ready easy to understand Risk and Return Relationship PowerPoint Presentation Slides. The visually appealing portfolio risk-return trade-off PowerPoint compete deck includes a set of pre-made PPT slides such as risk and return of stock bonds, and T-bills, investment strategies of predefined portfolios, risk and return of portfolio manager, measuring stock volatility proportionate, portfolio return analysis, calculating asset beta, portfolio value at risk, ranking the passive income streams impact and many more. Discuss the relationship between risk and return using security analysis and portfolio management PPT visuals. Utilize the professionally designed risk-return trade-off to structure your financial presentation. Furthermore, risk and return equation PPT visuals are completely customizable. You can add or delete the content if needed. Download this easy to use security analysis and portfolio management presentation deck to illustrate the risk-return relationship. Halt the growth of cultural differences with our Risk And Return Relationship PowerPoint Presentation Slides. Focus on bringing about acceptance.
2. Recommendation: SELL
Price Target: $29.00
Current Price: $29.98
2
SELL
Driver 1:
Driver 2:
Driver 3:
Valuation
Risks
Fund Status Current AUM (Mil.)
Global Equity Team
Non-U.S. Growth Closed 30187
Non-U.S. SmallCap Growth Closed 1323
GlobalEquity Team Open 786
GlobalSmallCap Open 138
U.S. Value Team
U.S. Mid-Cap Value* Closed 7959
Growth Team
U.S. Mid- Cap Growth Closed 15103
U.S. SmallCap Growth Closed 2270
GlobalOpportunities Strategy Open 7556
Global Value
Non-U.S. Value Closed 16257
GlobalValue Open 13925
Emerging Markets
Emerging Markets Open 571
Credit Team
High Income Open 989
Developing World
Developing World Open 374
Total 99848
*Closed to new investors as of February 1st, 2016
Artisan Partners Product Summary
2014 2015 2016 E 2017 E
Revenue 107,915$ 108,700$ 102,055$ 100,014$
EBIT 248 223 214 205
EPS -0.39 1.71 1.80 1.72
Income Statement Summary
Bear Base Bull P/E P/S
$25.10 $33.10 $43.20 $23.00 $23.40
Valuation Results
DCF Results Summary Relative Summary
Artisan Partners (APAM)
Limited growth
opportunities
Declining fund
performance
High fees require superior
returns
Three risk types: market,
operational, and regulatory
Overvalued on relative basis
and fairly valued with DCF
3 Year
Current High Low Avg
P/E (LTM) 15.6 136.8 14.8 56.3
P/E (NTM) 16.7 21.4 11.3 16.1
PEG (NTM) 1.7 2.1 0.8 1.2
P/Bk 18.5 528.7 16.8 97.4
P/CF 3.0 29.0 2.8 8.5
P/Sales 1.7 6.6 1.0 1.8
Div Yld 7.8% 8.4% 0.0% 2.8%
Valuation Multiples
3. Global Equity
Team
31%
Growth Team
24%
Global Value
Team
31%
U.S. Value
Team
12%
Emerging
Markets Team
1%
Credit Team
1% Developing
World Team
0%
Figure 1: APAM Investment Teams by AUM
Autonomous Structure
15 strategies managed by 7
independent teams
Business Overview
3
Business Driver 1 Driver 2 Driver 3 Financials Debt Comps DCF
Valuation
Blended
Valuation Risks Summary
Concentration of Holdings
99% of AUM in long-equity holdings Figure 2: Performance & Alpha Generation Trends
80%
48% 45%
135%
-15%
-28%-50%
0%
50%
100%
150%
5 Year 3 Year 1 Year
% of APAM Mutual Funds in the Top 50%
of Performance
Weighted Average Alpha Generation
Declining Performance
Relative to peers on a five, three, and
one year basis
4. Business Driver 1 Driver 2 Driver 3 Financials Debt Comps DCF
Valuation
Blended
Valuation Risks Summary
Driver 1: Lack of Growth Opportunities
4
Passive Management Trend
Fund Status
75% of APAM’s AUM resides in closed
funds
Alternative Investments
Artisan has no alternative exposure
From 2005-2013, alternative investments
have grown at a compounded annual
rate of 9.4% 3.2 4.1 5.0 5.0 5.3 5.9 6.3 6.8 7.2
37.1
42.8
46
37.9
42.8 45.7 45.7
50.2
56.7
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Alternative Traditional
Figure 4: Global AUM 2005-2013
Source: McKinsey Analysis: Hedge Fund Research
Investor preferences have shifted to low
fee products
Long-term AUM:
Passive CAGR: 36%
Active CAGR: 12%
Figure 3: Active and Passive AUM
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014
Active Passive
Source: Bank of America Merrill Lynch
5. Approximately $4B in net outflows in 2015
Business Driver 1 Driver 2 Driver 3 Financials Debt Comps DCF
Valuation
Blended
Valuation Risks Summary
Market Appreciation
Market performance has a positive correlation with fund flows
Driver 2: Performance and Flows
5
-5%
-4%
-3%
-2%
-1%
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
1Q
2013
2Q
2013
3Q
2013
4Q
2013
1Q
2014
2Q
2014
3Q
2014
4Q
2014
1Q
2015
2Q
2015
3Q
2015
APAM Peer Group Composite
Figure 7: Fund Flows
-60%
-40%
-20%
0%
20%
40%
60%
-80,000
-60,000
-40,000
-20,000
0
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
01/97 02/99 03/01 04/03 05/05 06/07 07/09 08/11 09/13 10/15
Trailing 12-Mo S&P 500 Price Return - R
Flow Mutual Funds - Equities (Mil)
Figure 5: Mutual Fund Flows vs. Market Returns
Source: Factset
Performance
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
1 Year3 Year5 Year10 Year
2013 2014 2Q 2015 3Q 2015
Figure 6: Percent of AUM in
Outperforming Strategies
Source: Company Reports
Source: Company Reports
Declining performance has had a negative impact on flows
Net Organic Flows
6. Business Driver 1 Driver 2 Driver 3 Financials Debt Comps DCF
Valuation
Blended
Valuation Risks Summary
46
47
47
48
48
49
49
50
50
51
51
2012 2013 2014
BasisPoints
Driver 3: Fees
6
Fee Structure
2014 APAM average: 77 bps vs. industry
average approximately 48 bps
Clients expect continuous outperformance
when paying a premium fee
Source: Investment Company Institute and Lipper
Figure 9: Average Expense Ratios
Passive Management
Investors are choosing indexed products
over active funds
Last ten years: Lowest quintile has
experienced $3T in flows, compared to
only $160B in the other four quintiles
-200
-100
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Lowest-Cost Quintile Quintiles 2 Through 5
Figure 8: Annual Flows by Quintile (Billions)
Source: Morningstar
Fee Compression
Average active management fees have
been on a decline since 2000
7. $-
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
$(5,000)
$-
$5,000
$10,000
$15,000
$20,000
$25,000
$30,000
$35,000
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
AUM From Market Appreciation AUM From Organic Flows Revenue (R)
Business Driver 1 Driver 2 Driver 3 Financials Debt Comps DCF
Valuation
Blended
Valuation Risks Summary
Source: Industry Data
51%
41%
33%
41%
31%
12%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Figure 11: Peer Compensation Expense
Financials
7
Compensation expense higher than peers
Investment teams are paid 25% of
revenue
Much higher than peers as a percent of
revenue
5.4%
25%
11%
13%
17%
6%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
Figure 12: Peer Marketing and Distribution
Source: FactSet
Marketing and Distribution below peers
Targets institutional clients
Institutional clients are stickier with assets
Miss out on faster growing retail market
Revenue = Fees X Assets Under Management
AUM = Client Flows + Market Appreciation
Figure 10: Revenue Composition
Source: Industry Data
8. Source: Company Financials
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
APAM GBL WDR CLMS CNS MN
Debt Analysis
8
Source: Company Financials
Used IPO in 2013 to “Fix” Balance Sheet
Shift from negative to positive equity
Raised $350 million through IPO
$200 million in borrowings
Secondary offering March 2015 of $3.8 million
Figure 13: Firm Capital Structure
$(400)
$(200)
$-
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Total Equity Class B Liability Awards LT Debt
Source: Company Financials
Figure 14: Equity Multiplier Vs. Industry
Figure 15: Use of IPO Proceeds
Overleveraged compared to competitors
Operational risk significantly higher relative to peers
Current Debt to Assets of 23% vs. industry average of
10%
Business Driver 1 Driver 2 Driver 3 Financials Debt Comps DCF
Valuation
Blended
Valuation Risks Summary
11. Business Driver 1 Driver 2 Driver 3 Financials Debt Comps DCF
Valuation
Blended
Valuation Risks Summary
$23.00 $23.40 $33.43
$-
$5
$10
$15
$20
$25
$30
$35
$40
P/S P/E DCF
Valuation- Blended Average
11
Price target of $29
Blended Valuation
Three-stage DCF- 13.5x
Relative Price to Earnings- 13.0x
Relative Price to Sales- 1.3x
$29 Target Price
Source: Team Analysis
Source: Team Analysis
Figure 20: DCF’s Price Targets
Figure 21: Weighted Average Component
Weights Method of Valuation Intrinsic Value Weighted Average Component
3-Stage Discounted Cash Flow: $33.43
Bear Case: $24.49
Base Case: $33.28
Bull Case: $42.52
20% Relative Price to Earnings: $23.40 $4.68
20% Relative Price to Sales: $23.00 $4.60
100% $29.00
60% $20.06
Complete Valuation:
12. Risks
12
Market Risks Operational
Risks
Regulatory and Economic Risks
Regulatory
Compliance
International
Exposure
Performance
Expectations
Long Equity
Positioning
Revenue
Diversification
Concentration
of Funds
Instability of
Contracts
Figure 22: Risks Venn Diagram
Key personnel risk
Business Driver 1 Driver 2 Driver 3 Financials Debt Comps DCF
Valuation
Blended
Valuation Risks Summary
13. Summary
Driver Summary:
Limited growth due to trends
toward passive management and
alternatives
High proportion of closed funds
and declining performance
decreases asset inflow potential
Fee compression is possible if
performance does not justify fees
13
Financial:
AUM is expected to decline which
will decrease revenue and
earnings
Valuation:
APAM is neutral on a DCF basis
and overvalued on a relative
basis
Recommendation:
SELL rating with price target of
$29
Business Driver 1 Driver 2 Driver 3 Financials Debt Comps DCF
Valuation
Blended
Valuation Risks Summary
14. Appendices
14
Global Equity Strategies:
International Fund… 15
Global Equity Fund… 16
Small Cap International Fund… 17
Global Small Cap Fund… 18
Value Strategies:
Mid-Cap Value Fund… 19
Value Fund… 20
Small-Cap Value Fund… 21
Growth Strategies:
Mid-Cap Growth Fund… 22
Small-Cap Growth Fund… 23
Global Value Strategies:
Global Value Opportunities Fund.. 24
International Fund… 25
Global Value Fund… 26
Emerging Markets Strategies:
High Income Fund… 27
Developing World Fund… 28
Emerging Markets Fund… 29
Fund Profiles: Corporate Structure and Firm Details
Corporate Structure… 30
Fund Performance… 31
International Funds… 32
SWOT Analysis… 33
Net Client Flows by Fund Team … 34
Net Client Flows and Firm AUM… 35
Monthly AUM by Fund… 36
Monthly AUM by Fund Continued… 37
15. Team: Global Equity
15
Fund: International
Total AUM: $18,203M
Net Asset Value: $26.84 (as of January 29, 2016)
Availability: Open
Inception: 28-Dec-95
Expense Ratio: 1.17% (As of September 30, 2015)
Key Statistics (as of December 31, 2015)
Morningstar Overall Rating 3 Yr Morningstar Rating
5 Yr Morningstar Rating 10 Yr Morningstar Rating
1 Yr Lipper Percentile 91st 3 Yr Lipper Percentile 6th
5 Yr Lipper Percentile 4th 10 Yr Lipper Percentile 13th
Inception Lipper Percentile 7th
Ratings & Rankings
95%
217%
122%
-50%
0%
50%
100%
150%
200%
250%
Relative Artisan International Fund - Investor Shares (Net of Fees) MSCI ACWI Ex USA (Net)/MSCI ACWI Ex USA (Gross) Linked Index
Back
16. 16
27%
72%
44%
-20%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Relative Artisan Global Equity Fund - Investor Shares (Net of Fees) MSCI All Country World Index (Net)
Total AUM: $331M
Net Asset Value: $14.67 (as of January 29, 2016)
Availability: Open
Inception: 29-Mar-10
Expense Ratio: 1.37% (As of September 30, 2015)
Key Statistics (as of December 31, 2015)
Morningstar Overall Rating 3 Yr Morningstar Rating
5 Yr Morningstar Rating 10 Yr Morningstar Rating NA
1 Yr Lipper Percentile 39th 3 Yr Lipper Percentile 27th
5 Yr Lipper Percentile 4th 10 Yr Lipper Percentile NA
Inception Lipper Percentile 4th
Ratings & Rankings
Team: Global Equity Fund: Global Equity
Back
17. 17
-0.09%
6.70%
6.79%
-4%
-2%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
Inception 10 Yr 5 Yr 3 Yr 1 Yr YTD QTD
Relative Fund: ARTJX Benchmark: MSCI EAFE Small Cap Index
Total AUM: $1,001M
Net Asset Value: $22.45 (as of January 29, 2016)
Availability: Closed to most new investors
Inception: 21-Dec-01
Expense Ratio: 1.52% (As of September 30, 2015)
Key Statistics (as of December 31, 2015)
Morningstar Overall Rating 3 Yr Morningstar Rating
5 Yr Morningstar Rating 10 Yr Morningstar Rating
1 Yr Lipper Percentile 15th 3 Yr Lipper Percentile 57th
5 Yr Lipper Percentile 21st 10 Yr Lipper Percentile 14th
Inception Lipper Percentile 11th
Ratings & Rankings
Team: Global Equity Fund: Int. Small-Cap
Back
18. 18
-5%
14%
19%
-15%
-10%
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
Relative Artisan Global Small Cap Fund (Net of Fees) MSCI All Country World Small Cap Index (Net)
Total AUM: $138M
Net Asset Value: $10.12 (as of January 29, 2016)
Availability: Open
Inception: 25-Jun-13
Expense Ratio: 1.50% (As of September 30, 2015)
Key Statistics (as of December 31, 2015)
Morningstar Overall Rating 3 Yr Morningstar Rating
5 Yr Morningstar Rating 10 Yr Morningstar Rating NA
1 Yr Lipper Percentile 39th 3 Yr Lipper Percentile 27th
5 Yr Lipper Percentile 4th 10 Yr Lipper Percentile NA
Inception Lipper Percentile 4th
Ratings & Rankings
Team: Global Equity Fund: Global Small-Cap
Back
19. 19
4%
160%
156%
-20%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
140%
160%
180%
200%
Relative Artisan Mid Cap Value Fund - Investor Shares (Net of Fees) Russell Midcap Value Index With Dividends
Total AUM: $5,387M
Net Asset Value: $17.76 (as of January 29, 2016)
Availability: Closed to most new investors
Inception: 28-Mar-01
Expense Ratio: 1.19% (As of September 30, 2015)
Key Statistics (as of December 31, 2015)
Morningstar Overall Rating 3 Yr Morningstar Rating
5 Yr Morningstar Rating 10 Yr Morningstar Rating
1 Yr Lipper Percentile 88th 3 Yr Lipper Percentile 95th
5 Yr Lipper Percentile 76th 10 Yr Lipper Percentile 37th
Inception Lipper Percentile 14th
Ratings & Rankings
Team: Value Fund: Mid-Cap Value
Back
20. -15%
-10%
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
Inception 5 Yr 3 Yr 1 Yr YTD QTD
Relative Fund: ARTLX Benchmark: Russell 1000 Value Index
Total AUM: $923M
Net Asset Value: $10.25 (as of January 29, 2016)
Availability: Open
Inception: 27-Mar-06
Expense Ratio: 1.00% (As of September 30, 2015)
Key Statistics (as of December 31, 2015)
Morningstar Overall Rating 3 Yr Morningstar Rating
5 Yr Morningstar Rating 10 Yr Morningstar Rating NA
1 Yr Lipper Percentile 82nd 3 Yr Lipper Percentile 95th
5 Yr Lipper Percentile 79th 10 Yr Lipper Percentile NA
Inception Lipper Percentile 61st
Ratings & Rankings
Team: Value Fund: Value
20
Back
21. 21
8%
171%
163%
-50%
0%
50%
100%
150%
200%
250%
Relative Artisan Small Cap Value Fund - Investor Shares (Net of Fees) Russell 2000 Value Index With Dividends
Total AUM: $396M
Net Asset Value: $9.69 (as of January 29, 2016)
Availability: Closed to most new investors
Inception: 29-Sep-97
Expense Ratio: 1.26% (As of September 30, 2015)
Key Statistics (as of December 31, 2015)
Morningstar Overall Rating 3 Yr Morningstar Rating
5 Yr Morningstar Rating 10 Yr Morningstar Rating
1 Yr Lipper Percentile 88th 3 Yr Lipper Percentile 98th
5 Yr Lipper Percentile 99th 10 Yr Lipper Percentile 89th
Inception Lipper Percentile 38th
Ratings & Rankings
Team: Value Fund: Small-Cap Value
Back
22. 22
90%
276%
186%
-50%
0%
50%
100%
150%
200%
250%
300%
Relative Artisan Mid Cap Fund - Investor Shares (Net of Fees) Russell Midcap Growth Index With Dividends
Total AUM: $8,737M
Net Asset Value: $35.75 (as of January 29, 2016)
Availability: Closed to most new investors
Inception: 27-Jun-97
Expense Ratio: 1.19% (As of September 30, 2015)
Key Statistics (as of December 31, 2015)
Morningstar Overall Rating 3 Yr Morningstar Rating
5 Yr Morningstar Rating 10 Yr Morningstar Rating
1 Yr Lipper Percentile 58th 3 Yr Lipper Percentile 64th
5 Yr Lipper Percentile 45th 10 Yr Lipper Percentile 6th
Inception Lipper Percentile 1st
Ratings & Rankings
Team: Growth Fund: Mid-Cap
Back
23. 23
11%
211%
201%
-50%
0%
50%
100%
150%
200%
250%
Relative Artisan Small Cap Fund - Investor Shares (Net of Fees) Russell 2000 Growth Index With Dividends
Morningstar Overall Rating 3 Yr Morningstar Rating
5 Yr Morningstar Rating 10 Yr Morningstar Rating
1 Yr Lipper Percentile 25th 3 Yr Lipper Percentile 54th
5 Yr Lipper Percentile 11th 10 Yr Lipper Percentile 62nd
Inception Lipper Percentile 61st
Ratings & Rankings
Total AUM: $1,255M
Net Asset Value: $23.79 (as of January 29, 2016)
Availability: Closed to most new investors
Inception: 28-Mar-95
Expense Ratio: 1.23% (As of September 30, 2015)
Key Statistics (as of December 31, 2015)
Team: Growth Fund: Small-Cap
Back
24. 24
35%
93%
58%
-60%
-40%
-20%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
Relative Artisan Global Opportunities Fund - Investor Shares (Net of Fees) MSCI All Country World Index (Net)
Morningstar Overall Rating 3 Yr Morningstar Rating
5 Yr Morningstar Rating 10 Yr Morningstar Rating NA
1 Yr Lipper Percentile 6th 3 Yr Lipper Percentile 20th
5 Yr Lipper Percentile 5th 10 Yr Lipper Percentile NA
Inception Lipper Percentile 5th
Ratings & Rankings
Total AUM: $1,529M
Net Asset Value: $18.19 (as of January 29, 2016)
Availability: Open
Inception: 22-Sep-08
Expense Ratio: 1.19% (As of September 30, 2015)
Key Statistics (as of December 31, 2015)
Team: Global Value Fund: Global Opportunities
Back
25. 25
62%
182%
121%
-50%
0%
50%
100%
150%
200%
Relative Artisan International Value Fund - Investor Shares (Net of Fees) MSCI EAFE Value Index (Net)
Morningstar Overall Rating 3 Yr Morningstar Rating
5 Yr Morningstar Rating 10 Yr Morningstar Rating
1 Yr Lipper Percentile 40th 3 Yr Lipper Percentile 1st
5 Yr Lipper Percentile 1st 10 Yr Lipper Percentile 2nd
Inception Lipper Percentile 2nd
Ratings & Rankings
Total AUM: $10,696M
Net Asset Value: $30.11 (as of January 29, 2016)
Availability: Closed to most new investors
Inception: 23-Sep-02
Expense Ratio: 1.17% (As of September 30, 2015)
Key Statistics (as of December 31, 2015)
Team: Global Value Fund: International
Back
26. 26
36%
70%
34%
-80%
-60%
-40%
-20%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
Relative Artisan Global Value Fund - Investor Shares (Net of Fees) MSCI All Country World Index (Net)
Total AUM: $1,595M
Net Asset Value: $13.39 (as of January 29, 2016)
Availability: Open
Inception: 10-Dec-07
Expense Ratio: 1.28% (As of September 30, 2015)
Key Statistics (as of December 31, 2015)
Morningstar Overall Rating 3 Yr Morningstar Rating
5 Yr Morningstar Rating 10 Yr Morningstar Rating NA
1 Yr Lipper Percentile 77th 3 Yr Lipper Percentile 27th
5 Yr Lipper Percentile 5th 10 Yr Lipper Percentile NA
Inception Lipper Percentile 4th
Ratings & Rankings
Team: Global Value Fund: Global Value
Back
27. 27
8%
3%
-5%
-6%
-4%
-2%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
Relative
Artisan High Income Fund - Investor Shares (Net of Fees)
BofA Merrill Lynch U.S. High Yield Master II Total Return Index
Total AUM: $989
Net Asset Value: $9.01 (as of January 29, 2016)
Availability: Open
Inception: 19-Mar-14
Expense Ratio: 0.93% (As of September 30, 2015)
Key Statistics (as of December 31, 2015)
< 1 year 0.0%
1 - <3 years 0.07%
3 - <5 years 13.4%
5 - <7 years 54.3%
7 - <10 years 27.7%
10+ years 3.9%
Maturity Distribution
Team: Emerging Markets Fund: High Income
Back
28. 28
4.5%
-12.1%
-16.6%
-20%
-15%
-10%
-5%
0%
5%
10%
Relative Artisan Developing World Fund - Investor Shares (Net of Fees) MSCI Emerging Markets Index (Net)
Total AUM: $372M
Net Asset Value: $8.30 (as of January 29, 2016)
Availability: Open
Inception: 29-Jun-15
Expense Ratio: 1.50% (As of September 30, 2015)
Key Statistics (as of December 31, 2015)
Morningstar Overall Rating NA 3 Yr Morningstar Rating NA
5 Yr Morningstar Rating NA 10 Yr Morningstar Rating NA
1 Yr Lipper Percentile NA 3 Yr Lipper Percentile NA
5 Yr Lipper Percentile NA 10 Yr Lipper Percentile NA
Inception Lipper Percentile NA
Ratings & Rankings
Team: Emerging Markets Fund: Developing World
Back
29. 29
-17%
39%
56%
-40%
-20%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Relative Artisan Emerging Markets Fund - Investor Shares Linked (Net of Fees) MSCI Emerging Markets Index (Net)
Total AUM: $56M
Net Asset Value: $9.87 (as of January 29, 2016)
Availability: Open
Inception: 2-Jun-08
Expense Ratio: 1.50% (As of September 30, 2015)
Key Statistics (as of December 31, 2015)
Morningstar Overall Rating 3 Yr Morningstar Rating
5 Yr Morningstar Rating 10 Yr Morningstar Rating NA
1 Yr Lipper Percentile 36th 3 Yr Lipper Percentile 60th
5 Yr Lipper Percentile 89th 10 Yr Lipper Percentile NA
Inception Lipper Percentile 91st
Ratings & Rankings
Team: Emerging Markets Fund: Emerging Markets
Back
31. Fund Performance
31
As of 2/28/2015 $ Millions
Global Equity Team
Non-U.S. Growth 31,213
Non-U.S. Small-Cap Growth 1,293
Global Equity Team 723
Global Small-Cap Growth 126
U.S. Value Team
U.S. Mid-Cap Value 13,389
U.S. Small-Cap Value 2,018
Value Equity 1,920
Growth Team
U.S. Mid-Cap Growth 16,986
U.S. Small-Cap Growth 2,726
Global Opportunities 5,447
Global Value Team
Non-U.S. Value 17,491
Global Value 15,648
Emerging Markets Team
Emerging Markets 773
Credit Team
High Income 629
Developing World Team
Developing World N/A
Firm Total: $ 110,382
AUM decreased by 17.33% from 2/28/2015 to 2/29/2016
As of 2/29/2016 $ Millions % Change
Global Equity Team
Non-U.S. Growth 27,297 -12.55%
Non-U.S. Small-Cap Growth 1,741 34.65%
Global Equity Team 686 -5.12%
Global Small-Cap Growth 119 -5.56%
U.S. Value Team
U.S. Mid-Cap Value 7,062 -47.26%
U.S. Small-Cap Value 697 -65.46%
Value Equity 1,488 -22.50%
Growth Team
U.S. Mid-Cap Growth 13,159 -22.53%
U.S. Small-Cap Growth 1,955 -28.28%
Global Opportunities 6,936 27.34%
Global Value Team
Non-U.S. Value 15,420 -11.84%
Global Value 13,179 -15.78%
Emerging Markets Team
Emerging Markets 513 -33.64%
Credit Team
High Income 1,144 81.88%
Developing World Team
Developing World 420 -
Firm Total: $ 91,249 -17.33%
Back
32. International Funds
32
As of December 31, 2014:
45% of AUM was invested in strategies that primarily
invest in securities of non-U.S. companies
42% of AUM was invested in securities denominated in
currencies other than USD
The weighted average international fee (based on
numbers given in the prospectus) is 1.12%
Back
33. SWOT Analysis
33
Strengths
Autonomous Structure
Expense Flexibility
Strong Fund Ratings
Weaknesses
Closed Funds
Lack of Diversification
Heavily Weighted in Institutional
Distribution
Opportunities
Product Mix
Alternative Investments
Asia-Pacific Region
Threats
Passive Investing
Unforeseen Withdrawals
Positive Negative
Internal
Factors
External
Factors
Back
36. Monthly AUM by Fund
36
April '14 May'14 June '14 July '14 August '14 Sept '14 Oct. '14 Nov. '14 Dec. '14 Jan. '15 Feb. '15 March '15 April '15 May'15 June '15 July '15 August '15 Sept '15 Oct. '15 Nov. '15 Dec. '15
Non-U.S. Growth Closed 27464 28295 29121 28411 28740 28069 28669 29808 29392 30254 31213 31470 32289 32939 32348 32274 29683 28178 30396 30872 30187
% of Total 25.7% 25.9% 26.0% 26.1% 25.7% 26.4% 26.5% 27.2% 27.2% 28.4% 28.3% 29.2% 29.3% 29.5% 29.6% 29.7% 29.2% 29.1% 29.4% 30.1% 30.2%
Non-U.S. Small Cap Growth Closed 1699 1683 1665 1526 1497 1413 1385 1337 1247 1251 1293 1289 1425 1413 1372 1321 1263 1254 1334 1324 1323
% of Total 1.6% 1.5% 1.5% 1.4% 1.3% 1.3% 1.3% 1.2% 1.2% 1.2% 1.2% 1.2% 1.3% 1.3% 1.3% 1.2% 1.2% 1.3% 1.3% 1.3% 1.3%
Global Equity Team Open 316 322 328 326 674 653 682 695 680 682 723 716 741 763 762 801 750 718 764 782 786
% of Total 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.7% 0.7% 0.7% 0.7% 0.7% 0.7% 0.7% 0.7% 0.7% 0.8% 0.8%
Global Small Cap Open 164 177 186 177 180 166 169 163 133 129 126 126 141 146 143 142 133 130 136 136 138
% of Total 0.2% 0.2% 0.2% 0.2% 0.2% 0.2% 0.2% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1%
U.S. Mid-Cap Value Closed 15467 15563 15802 15191 15548 14627 14403 14155 13740 13076 13389 12881 12476 12213 11532 10774 9903 9211 9429 8774 7959
% of Total 14.5% 14.2% 14.1% 14.0% 13.9% 13.8% 13.3% 12.9% 12.7% 12.3% 12.1% 12.0% 11.3% 10.9% 10.6% 9.9% 9.8% 9.5% 9.1% 8.6% 8.0%
U.S. Small-Cap Value Closed 3780 3696 3593 3570 3266 2852 2834 2634 2414 2077 2018 1533 1525 1502 1297 1092 1059 1002 968 937 854
% of Total 3.5% 3.4% 3.2% 3.3% 2.9% 2.7% 2.6% 2.4% 2.2% 2.0% 1.8% 1.4% 1.4% 1.3% 1.2% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 0.9% 0.9% 0.9%
Value Equity Open 2046 2199 2154 2106 2176 2067 2040 2024 1958 1863 1920 1829 1803 2233 2060 1971 1884 1586 1728 1677 1556
% of Total 1.9% 2.0% 1.9% 1.9% 1.9% 1.9% 1.9% 1.8% 1.8% 1.8% 1.7% 1.7% 1.6% 2.0% 1.9% 1.8% 1.9% 1.6% 1.7% 1.6% 1.6%
Total TeamAUM 21293 21458 21549 20867 20990 19546 19277 18813 18112 17016 17327 16243 15804 15948 14889 13837 12846 11799 12125 11388 10369
Team% 19.9% 19.6% 19.2% 19.2% 18.7% 18.4% 17.8% 17.2% 16.8% 16.0% 15.7% 15.1% 14.3% 14.3% 13.6% 12.7% 12.7% 12.2% 11.7% 11.1% 10.4%
U.S. Mid- Cap Growth Closed 15936 16193 16713 15999 16775 16094 16826 16953 16634 16320 16986 16898 16691 16607 16552 16925 15820 15019 15615 15628 15103
% of Total 14.9% 14.8% 14.9% 14.7% 15.0% 15.2% 15.6% 15.5% 15.4% 15.3% 15.4% 15.7% 15.2% 14.9% 15.2% 15.6% 15.6% 15.5% 15.1% 15.3% 15.1%
U.S. Small Cap Growth Closed 2669 2694 2894 2644 2762 2624 2734 2731 2744 2629 2726 1651 2551 2508 2493 2492 2365 2259 2333 2353 2270
% of Total 2.5% 2.5% 2.6% 2.4% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 1.5% 2.3% 2.2% 2.3% 2.3% 2.3% 2.3% 2.3% 2.3% 2.3%
Global Opportunities Strategy Open 3002 3203 3885 3995 4225 4127 4737 4832 5121 5146 5447 5515 6041 6600 6661 6800 6442 6459 7127 7396 7556
% of Total 2.8% 2.9% 3.5% 3.7% 3.8% 3.9% 4.4% 4.4% 4.7% 4.8% 4.9% 5.1% 5.5% 5.9% 6.1% 6.3% 6.3% 6.7% 6.9% 7.2% 7.6%
Non-U.S. Value Closed 17450 17938 18298 17800 17898 17046 17158 17268 16872 16713 17491 17326 17713 17886 17588 17608 16640 16016 17210 16508 16257
% of Total 16.3% 16.4% 16.3% 16.4% 16.0% 16.1% 15.9% 15.8% 15.6% 15.7% 15.8% 16.1% 16.1% 16.0% 16.1% 16.2% 16.4% 16.5% 16.6% 16.1% 16.3%
Global Value Open 15230 15638 15811 15510 16639 14977 15146 15508 15609 14893 15648 15186 15366 15389 15007 15050 14099 13573 14559 14221 13925
% of Total 14.3% 14.3% 14.1% 14.2% 14.9% 14.1% 14.0% 14.2% 14.5% 14.0% 14.2% 14.1% 14.0% 13.8% 13.7% 13.8% 13.9% 14.0% 14.1% 13.9% 13.9%
Emerging Markets Open 1310 1321 1237 1223 1147 984 858 859 806 798 773 629 683 653 623 597 547 533 600 589 571
% of Total 1.2% 1.2% 1.1% 1.1% 1.0% 0.9% 0.8% 0.8% 0.7% 0.7% 0.7% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6%
High Income Open 203 293 311 387 461 505 537 542 565 590 629 674 691 706 726 783 829 912 964 999 989
% of Total 0.2% 0.3% 0.3% 0.4% 0.4% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.7% 0.7% 0.8% 0.9% 0.9% 1.0% 1.0%
Developing World Open 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 44 69 118 203 278 374
% of total 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.2% 0.3% 0.4%
Total Team 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 44 69 118 203 278 374
Total AUM 106736 109215 111998 108865 111988 106204 108178 109509 107915 106421 110382 107723 110136 111558 109174 108674 101486 96968 103366 102474 99848
Global Value
Open/Closed Monthly Assets Under Management
Growth Team
U.S. Value Team
Emerging Markets
Credit Team
Developing World
Global Equity Team
Appendix V: Monthly Assets under Management by Fund
Source: Company Reports
Back
37. Open and Closed Funds
37
Appendix W: Fund Status
Global Equity Team Status US Value Team Status
Non-U.S. Growth Closed U.S. Mid-Cap Value Closed
Non-U.S. Small Cap Growth Closed U.S. Small-Cap Value Closed
Global Equity Team Open Value Equity Open
Global Small Cap Open
Growth Team Status Global Value Status
U.S. Mid- Cap Growth Closed Non-U.S. Value Closed
U.S. Small Cap Growth Closed Global Value Open
Global Opportunities Strategy Open Value Equity Strategy Open
Emerging Markets Status Credit Team Status
Emerging Markets Open High Income Open
Developing World Status
Developing World Open
Source: Company Reports
Back