This document discusses the use of electronic whiteboards in education. It provides an overview of the prevalence of electronic whiteboards in K-12 schools and higher education, finding that they are most commonly used in K-12 classrooms. The document also explores potential benefits of electronic whiteboards, such as increased student engagement and motivation. However, it notes that electronic whiteboards alone are not a cure-all and effective strategies are still needed to fully leverage their capabilities. A variety of strategies for using electronic whiteboards are presented.

1. Painting
on an
Electronic Easel
Lindy Scripps-Hoekstra
Grand Valley State University

2. Electronic
Whiteboards
1WBs

3. Photo by Kevin Jarrett

4. My experience
Photo by Steelcase

5. 30
11
20 Offer/Plan to
Offer
On Campus
Do not offer
Ochoa & Caswell

7. K-12

8. 63.50%
21.80%
14.70%
K-12 Educators
Have Own
Share
Source: Robert M. Resnick, Education Market Research Group

9. Photo by Darren Kuropatwa
Engagement

10. “appetite for and enthusiastic response to innovative
teaching”
- Xu & Moloney, 2011
“captured their attention and motivated their work”
- Schroeder, 2008
“the students really seem to pay more attention
- Knight, 2003

12. Photo by Wesley Fryer
Cure-all?

13. So you have a
Smart Board…
Photo by Danny Nicholson

14. Strategy 1:
Take
advantage of
“drag-ability”

15. SecondaryPrimary
Census statistics
Article about significance
of Pete Seeger
Pete Seeger Recording
Book about population
changes in Detroit
Experiment to treat depression
by introducing meditation
Book about medicinal benefits
of meditation

16. Database Randomizer
ABI- Inform
Business
Source
Complete

17. T.V.
marketing
adults

18. Plagiarism?
Using common knowledge
without citing a source
Using and citing
someone’s exact
phrasing without
quotations

19. Strategy 2:
Theatrical
Tension

20. 10
Using common knowledge
without citing a source
Using and citing
someone’s
phrasing without
quotations
Plagiarism?

21. Strategy 3:
Tools &
Multimedia

23. www.barryfunenglish.com/tools

26. Strategy 4:
Brainstorming
2.0

29. Strategy 5:
Word
Processor
Integration

31. Strategy 6:
Opener
Closer

34. Photo by Branden Mann

35. Photo by Nick deWolf Photo Archive
Not Rethinking

36. Photo by Clyde

37. Photo by Hammerin Man
Not Sharing

39. Sharing
&
Questions
Slide background by Evelyn Flint

40. References
• Ball, B. (2003). Teaching and learning mathematics with an interactive whiteboard. Micromath: A Journal of the Association of Teachers of Mathematics
19(1), 4.
• Betcher, C., & Lee, M. (2009). The interactive whiteboard revolution: Teaching with IWBs. Camberwell, Australia: ACER Press.
• Glover, D., Miller, D., Averis, D., & Door, V. (2005).The interactive whiteboard: A literature survey. Technology, Pedagogy & Education, 14(2), 155-
170.
• Glover, D., Miller, D., Averis, D., & Door, V. (2007). The evolution of an effective pedagogy for teachers using the interactive whiteboard in
mathematics and modern languages: An empirical analysis from the secondary sector. Learning, Media, & Technology, 32(1), 5-20.
• Kearney, M., & Schuck, S. (2008).Exploring pedagogy with interactive whiteboards in Australian schools. Australian Educational Computing 23(1),8-14
• Knight, E. (2003). How smart is a SMART board for an academic library? Using an electronic whiteboard for research instruction. Kentucky Libraries
67(3), 4-7.
• Ochoa, M.N., & Caswell, T. (2012). SPEC kit 328: Collaborative teaching and learning tools. Washington DC: Association of Research Libraries.
• Schroeder, R. (2007). Active learning with interactive whiteboards: A literature review and case study for college freshmen. Communications in
Information Literacy 1(2), 64-73.
• Xu, H.L., & Moloney, R. (2011). “It makes the whole learning experience better”: Student feedback on the use of the interactive whiteboard in learning
Chinese at the tertiary level. Asian Social Science 7(11), 20-34.
• Young, J. (2002). „Electronic whiteboards‟ add flexibility to classrooms. Chronicle of Higher Education, 48(22), A36.
• Young, J. (2006). Better technology in high schools raises students‟ expectations. Chronicle of Higher Education, 53(5), A31.