Paper Hypotheses
1-Uranus had effected on Mars Migration and defined its Displacement –i.e.– Mars Displacement (144 mkm) was defined before Mars Migration and this definition is done by Uranus Effect.
2-The Solar System Distances are distributed geometrically because Planet Motion depends on light motion
Let's Review Mars Migration Theory in following:
Mars Migration Theory Revision:
-Mars original orbital distance was 84 mkm. and Mars had immigrated from it to its current orbital distance 227.9 mkm
-Through Mars Motion from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm, Mars had collided with Venus and then Mars had collided with Earth also.
-From the Collisions debris The Earth Moon was created –and Mars had found its moons. And the rest debris had attracted by Jupiter and created The Asteroid Belt
The Giant-Impact Hypothesis is in consistency with Mars immigration theory
But
-Instead of the (Supposed Planet) Theia, Mars itself made the collisions- and caused the Earth –Moon Creation – through Mars Motion from (84 mkm) to (227.9 mkm)
Mars Immigration Theory solves The Giant-Impact Hypothesis difficulties:
I.Why Venus Has No Moon? – Because Mars had immigrated and moved from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm and pushed all debris in its motion direction – far from Venus – So Venus had found no debris around to create its own Moon - But Earth has a greater Mass and the debris lost their motion high momentum at Earth Position– so Earth could attract some debris and create its moon
II.The Lunar Magma Ocean (LMO) Origin– is Venus – because the moon is created by 3 planets debris (Venus – Earth – Mars) – So their rocks are found in it
III.Why The Iron Oxide (Feo) of the Moon= (13%)? Because The rate (13%) is a middle between Mars rate (18%) and the terrestrial mantle (8%).
IV.Why Mars diameter (and Mass) are decreased through the history? Because of the collisions – Mars diameter lost around ( 4.1 %) (And Mars mass also which causes difficulties for Mars gravitation equation)
V.Mars migration is done Because of The Sun Creation Process
VI.Is there a possibility that Mars will return to its original point (84 mkm)? Yes
VIIWhy? Because the Planet orbital distance is defined relative to its diameter (and Mass) –Mars now is in the wrong Position- but forced to still because of the sun effect.
A Conclusion
The Giant-impact hypothesis supports Mars migration Theory
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
1-The Planets were found before The Sun Creation.
2-Great changes had happened as results of The Sun Creation
3-These changes show Uranus effect on the inner planets
4-The Cycle 2737 years is produced resulting the Sun Creation
5-The Great changes are:
a.Mercury Day Is Changed From 176 Days To Be 175.94 Days
b.Venus Axial Tilt is changed from 1.774 degrees to 177.4 degrees
c.Pluto had to migrate far from Mercury 100 times (5906 mkm)
d.Mars had to migrate from its original orbital distance (84 mkm) to its current one (227.9mkm) (Mars Migration Theory)
Mars Migration Theory Revision:
-Mars original orbital distance was 84 mkm. and Mars had migrated from it to its current orbital distance 227.9 mkm
-Through Mars Motion from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm, Mars had collided with Venus and then Mars had collided with Earth also.
-From the Collisions debris The Earth Moon was created –and Mars had found its moons. And the rest debris had attracted by Jupiter and created The Asteroid Belt
The Giant-Impact Hypothesis is in consistency with Mars migration theory
But
-Instead of the (Supposed Planet) Theia, Mars itself made the collisions- and caused the Earth –Moon Creation – through Mars Motion from (84 mkm) to (227.9 mkm)
Mars migration Theory solves The Giant-Impact Hypothesis difficulties:
I.Why Venus Has No Moon? – Because Mars had migrated and moved from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm and pushed all debris in its motion direction – far from Venus – So Venus had found no debris around to create its own Moon - But Earth has a greater Mass and the debris lost their motion high momentum at Earth Position– so Earth could attract some debris and create its moon
II.The Lunar Magma Ocean (LMO) Origin– is Venus – because the moon is created by 3 planets debris (Venus – Earth – Mars) – So their rocks are found in it
III.Why The Iron Oxide (Feo) of the Moon= (13%)? Because The rate (13%) is a middle between Mars rate (18%) and the terrestrial mantle (8%).
IV. Why Mars diameter (and Mass) are decreased through the history? Because of the collisions – Mars diameter lost around ( 4.1 %) (And Mars mass also which causes difficulties for Mars gravitation equation)
V. Mars migration is done Because of The Sun Creation Process
VI. Is there a possibility that Mars will return to its original point (84 mkm)? Yes
VII. Why? Because the Planet orbital distance is defined relative to its diameter (and Mass) Mars now is in the wrong Position- but forced to it because of the sun effect
Conclusion
(1) The Giant-impact hypothesis supports Mars migration Theory
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper Argument
The Sun Is A Result Of The Solar Planets Motions- i.e. The Planets Were Moving Before The Sun Creation -
-The Paper compares between the solar system before & after The Sun Creation.
-The Paper asks "How did the planets move before The Sun Creation?"
-A Conclusion– The Sun is The Planets Motions Result and NOT The Reason.
Before The Sun Creation
The Solar Planets Order Was As Following
-Mercury (Where Pluto was The Mercury Moon) – then Mars –then Venus – Then Earth- The Uranus – Then Neptune – Then Jupiter –
After The Sun Creation
-The Planet Saturn Is Created
-Mars had migrated from its original orbital distance (84 mkm) to (227.9 mkm)
-Pluto had migrated from its original point (The Mercury Moon) to (5906 mkm) – and Pluto collided with Neptune and from this collision debris Pluto had created its moons and The Kuiper Belt is Created
Mars Migration Theory Revision:
-Mars original orbital distance was 84 mkm. and Mars had migrated to 227.9 mkm
-Through Mars Motion from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm, Mars had collided with Venus and then Mars had collided with Earth also.
-From the Collisions debris The Earth Moon was created –and Mars had found its moons. And the rest debris had attracted by Jupiter and created The Asteroid Belt
The Giant-Impact Hypothesis is in consistency with Mars migration theory
But
-Instead of the (Supposed Planet) Theia, Mars itself made the collisions.
Mars migration Theory solves The Giant-Impact Hypothesis difficulties:
I.Why Venus has No Moon? – Because Mars had migrated and moved from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm and pushed all debris in its motion direction – far from Venus – So Venus had found no debris around to create its own Moon - But Earth has a greater Mass and the debris lost their motion high momentum at Earth Position– so Earth could attract some debris and create its moon
II.The Lunar Magma Ocean (LMO) Origin– is Venus – because the moon is created by 3 planets debris (Venus – Earth – Mars) – So their rocks are found in it
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
This paper tries to answer 3 questions
(1st Question) Can "The Giant –Impact Hypothesis" provide a complete explanation for the Earth Moon Origin and Creation?
(2nd Question) Can Mars Immigration cause a risk on Earth?
(3rd Question) If Mars cause a risk on Earth, can the human save his life?
(Question No.1)
"Mars Immigration Theory Summary":
- Mars original orbital distance was 84 mkm. and Mars had immigrated from it to its current orbital distance 227.9 mkm
- Through Mars Motion from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm, Mars had collided with Venus and then Mars had collided with Earth also.
- From the Collisions debris Earth Moon was created –and Mars had found its moons. And the rest debris was attracted by Jupiter and created The Asteroid Belt
The Giant-impact hypothesis is in consistency with Mars immigration theory
But
- Instead of the (Supposed Planet) Theia, Mars itself made the collisions- and caused the Earth –Moon Creation -
Mars Immigration Theory solves The difficulties of Giant-impact hypothesis:
I. Why Venus Has No Moon? – Because Mars moved from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm and pushed all debris in its motion direction – far from Venus – but Earth has greater Mass and the debris lost their motion high momentum – so Earth could attract some debris and create its moon
II. The Lunar Magma Ocean (LMO) Origin– is Venus – because the moon is created by 3 planets debris (Venus – Earth – Mars) – So their rocks are found in it
III. Why The Iron Oxide (Feo) of the Moon= (13%)? Because The rate (13%) is a middle between Mars rate (18%) and the terrestrial mantle (8%).
IV. Why Mars diameter (and Mass) are decreased through the history? Because of the collisions – Mars diameter lost around (5%) (and Mars mass also which causes difficulties for Mars gravitation equation)
V. Why Mars was immigrated? Because of The Sun Creation Process
(A Conclusion: Giant-impact hypothesis supports Mars Immigration Theory)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Why couldn't Titius Bode Law predict Neptune’s orbital distanceGerges francis
Paper Question
Why couldn't Titius Bode Law predict Neptune’s orbital distance?
-Because – Mars and Pluto had migrated from their original orbital distances –Mars had Migrated from (84 mkm) to (227.9 mkm) and Pluto was The Mercury moon (58mkm) and had migrated to (5906 mkm) which was Neptune Position- Pluto had collided with Neptune and occupied its position –that's why Titius Bode Law predicts correctly Pluto orbital distance – because it's Neptune one and Pluto occupied it.
-From Pluto Neptune Collisions Debris The Kuiper belt is Created
Let's remember Mars Migration Theory in following…
Mars Migration Theory Revision:
-Mars original orbital distance was 84 mkm. and Mars had migrated from it to its current orbital distance 227.9 mkm
-Through Mars Motion from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm, Mars had collided with Venus and then Mars had collided with Earth also.
-From the Collisions debris The Earth Moon was created –and Mars had found its moons. And the rest debris had attracted by Jupiter and created The Asteroid Belt
The Giant-Impact Hypothesis is in consistency with Mars migration theory
But
-Instead of the (Supposed Planet) Theia, Mars itself made the collisions- and caused the Earth –Moon Creation – through Mars Motion from (84 mkm) to (227.9 mkm)
Mars migration Theory solves The Giant-Impact Hypothesis difficulties:
I.Why Venus Has No Moon? – Because Mars had migrated and moved from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm and pushed all debris in its motion direction – far from Venus – So Venus had found no debris around to create its own Moon - But Earth has a greater Mass and the debris lost their motion high momentum at Earth Position– so Earth could attract some debris and create its moon
II.The Lunar Magma Ocean (LMO) Origin– is Venus – because the moon is created by 3 planets debris (Venus – Earth – Mars) – So their rocks are found in it
III.Why The Iron Oxide (Feo) of the Moon= (13%)? Because The rate (13%) is a middle between Mars rate (18%) and the terrestrial mantle (8%).
IV.Why Mars diameter (and Mass) are decreased through the history? Because of the collisions – Mars diameter lost around ( 4.1 %) (And Mars mass also which causes difficulties for Mars gravitation equation)
V.Mars migration is done Because of The Sun Creation Process
VI.Is there a possibility that Mars will return to its original point (84 mkm)? Yes
VII.Why? Because the Planet orbital distance is defined relative to its diameter (and Mass) Mars now is in the wrong Position- but forced to it because of the sun effect
Conclusion
(1)The Giant-impact hypothesis supports Mars migration Theory
Paper Objectives:
The paper tries to prove that – Pluto Now Occupies Neptune Position in the sky – where Pluto was The Mercury Moon and had to migrate because of the Sun Creation
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper Hypotheses
1-The Sun Position in the sky is defined relative to Uranus Position. this geometrical feature is a unique one for Uranus.
2-Uranus had effected on Mars and caused Mars to migrate from its original orbital distance (84 mkm) to its current one (227.9 mkm).
3-The Cycle 2737 years is a real astronomical cycle and related to Mars Migration.
Let's Review Mars Migration Theory in following:
Mars Migration Theory Revision:
-Mars original orbital distance was 84 mkm. and Mars had migrated from it to its current orbital distance 227.9 mkm
-Through Mars Motion from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm, Mars had collided with Venus and then Mars had collided with Earth also.
-From the Collisions debris The Earth Moon was created –and Mars had found its moons. And the rest debris had attracted by Jupiter and created The Asteroid Belt
The Giant-Impact Hypothesis is in consistency with Mars migration theory
But
-Instead of the (Supposed Planet) Theia, Mars itself made the collisions- and caused the Earth –Moon Creation – through Mars Motion from (84 mkm) to (227.9 mkm)
Mars migration Theory solves The Giant-Impact Hypothesis difficulties:
I.Why Venus Has No Moon? – Because Mars had migrated and moved from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm and pushed all debris in its motion direction – far from Venus – So Venus had found no debris around to create its own Moon - But Earth has a greater Mass and the debris lost their motion high momentum at Earth Position– so Earth could attract some debris and create its moon
II.The Lunar Magma Ocean (LMO) Origin– is Venus – because the moon is created by 3 planets debris (Venus – Earth – Mars) – So their rocks are found in it
III.Why The Iron Oxide (Feo) of the Moon= (13%)? Because The rate (13%) is a middle between Mars rate (18%) and the terrestrial mantle (8%).
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Why Mars had immigrated with the Sun Creation Gerges francis
The Paper Hypothesis:
Because of The Sun Creation- Mars had immigrated from its original orbital distance (84mkm) to its current one (227.9 mkm)- after its Immigration– Mars had created configurations for its Data with the other planets –i.e. – Many Planets had changed their (own) data to be in configuration with Mars Data (Orbital Distance) – and because of these Data changes we could - through Planets Data analysis - conclude and prove Mars Immigration event through the solar system history.
Mars Immigration Theory Revision:
- Mars original orbital distance was 84 mkm. and Mars had immigrated from it to its current orbital distance 227.9 mkm
- Through Mars Motion from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm, Mars had collided with Venus and then Mars had collided with Earth also.
- From the Collisions debris The Earth Moon was created –and Mars had found its moons. And the rest debris had attracted by Jupiter and created The Asteroid Belt
The Giant-Impact Hypothesis is in consistency with Mars immigration theory
But
- Instead of the (Supposed Planet) Theia, Mars itself made the collisions- and caused the Earth –Moon Creation – through Mars Motion from (84 mkm) to (227.9 mkm)
Mars Immigration Theory solves The Giant-Impact Hypothesis difficulties:
I. Why Venus Has No Moon? – Because Mars had immigrated and moved from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm and pushed all debris in its motion direction – far from Venus – So Venus had found no debris around to create its own Moon - But Earth has a greater Mass and the debris lost their motion high momentum at Earth Position– so Earth could attract some debris and create its moon
II. The Lunar Magma Ocean (LMO) Origin– is Venus – because the moon is created by 3 planets debris (Venus – Earth – Mars) – So their rocks are found in it
III. Why The Iron Oxide (Feo) of the Moon= (13%)? Because The rate (13%) is a middle between Mars rate (18%) and the terrestrial mantle (8%).
IV. Why Mars diameter (and Mass) are decreased through the history? Because of the collisions – Mars diameter lost around ( 4.1 %) (And Mars mass also which causes difficulties for Mars gravitation equation)
V. Mars Immigration is done Because of The Sun Creation Process
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Abstract
Solar Group Creation And Motion
(A description which this paper tries to prove)
1- The Solar System Is created of one energy only - this one energy travels through the solar group from point to another point – creating the planet matter (because E=mc2) and planet orbital distance (because Space = Energy- My Hypothesis).
2- The Solar System Main Energy starts from Jupiter and travels to Pluto (from this energy Neptune orbital circumference is created consuming 16% of the total energy)
3- Neptune reflects the rest of energy toward the inner planets into 2 equal trajectories of energy
4- The Energy is sent from Neptune (and Pluto) to Mercury
5- Energy is sent from Mercury to Saturn
6- Pluto Motion specifically for 1 solar day depends on light motion for 1 second (where this moving light velocity =1.16 mkm/sec – my hypothesis) – that means – 1 second of light motion causes Pluto to move 1 solar day
7- Solar group is created based on Pluto motion for 1 solar day (solar planets diameters total = 406000km= Pluto motion for 1 solar day)
8- Planets motions energies accumulations with 2 other factor effects – lead to produce the sun light beams… these 2 factors are
a. The sun rate of time is different from Earth one
b. Jupiter Energy Interaction with the planets velocities total
9- i.e. Planets Motions energies total produce the sun rays based on changing the sun rate of time and the interaction with Jupiter energy
10- The produce light beam will be 0.3 mkm/second but the original one is 1.16 mkm/sec – for that – the value 0.3 will multiply with 4……(0.3x4 =1.2 mkm/sec from this value the original light beam 1.16 mkm/sec is produced) (Why it multiplies with 4 - because earth has a cycle of 4 years – 1461 days)
11- The final product will be 1.16 mkm/sec moves for 1 second only to repeat the cycle for tomorrow…
Precession Cycle Effect
Earth orbital distance =149.6 mkm – the light (0.3mkm/sec) needs around 500 seconds to pass this distance… Why?
Paper Hypotheses
Because
(1) Solar Group is one Trajectory of Energy – through which the Energy transports from point to another
(2) Pluto sends The Energy To Earth
(3) Pluto motion depends on a period =500 seconds – using by light beam with velocity =1.16 mkm/sec
(4) Earth motion depends on a period =500 seconds – using by light beam with velocity =0.3 mkm/sec
(5) The period 500 seconds is sent with Pluto energy to Earth
(6) The sending energy causes Pluto and Earth data harmony
The paper tries to prove these facts
1-The Planets were found before The Sun Creation.
2-Great changes had happened as results of The Sun Creation
3-These changes show Uranus effect on the inner planets
4-The Cycle 2737 years is produced resulting the Sun Creation
5-The Great changes are:
a.Mercury Day Is Changed From 176 Days To Be 175.94 Days
b.Venus Axial Tilt is changed from 1.774 degrees to 177.4 degrees
c.Pluto had to migrate far from Mercury 100 times (5906 mkm)
d.Mars had to migrate from its original orbital distance (84 mkm) to its current one (227.9mkm) (Mars Migration Theory)
Mars Migration Theory Revision:
-Mars original orbital distance was 84 mkm. and Mars had migrated from it to its current orbital distance 227.9 mkm
-Through Mars Motion from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm, Mars had collided with Venus and then Mars had collided with Earth also.
-From the Collisions debris The Earth Moon was created –and Mars had found its moons. And the rest debris had attracted by Jupiter and created The Asteroid Belt
The Giant-Impact Hypothesis is in consistency with Mars migration theory
But
-Instead of the (Supposed Planet) Theia, Mars itself made the collisions- and caused the Earth –Moon Creation – through Mars Motion from (84 mkm) to (227.9 mkm)
Mars migration Theory solves The Giant-Impact Hypothesis difficulties:
I.Why Venus Has No Moon? – Because Mars had migrated and moved from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm and pushed all debris in its motion direction – far from Venus – So Venus had found no debris around to create its own Moon - But Earth has a greater Mass and the debris lost their motion high momentum at Earth Position– so Earth could attract some debris and create its moon
II.The Lunar Magma Ocean (LMO) Origin– is Venus – because the moon is created by 3 planets debris (Venus – Earth – Mars) – So their rocks are found in it
III.Why The Iron Oxide (Feo) of the Moon= (13%)? Because The rate (13%) is a middle between Mars rate (18%) and the terrestrial mantle (8%).
IV. Why Mars diameter (and Mass) are decreased through the history? Because of the collisions – Mars diameter lost around ( 4.1 %) (And Mars mass also which causes difficulties for Mars gravitation equation)
V. Mars migration is done Because of The Sun Creation Process
VI. Is there a possibility that Mars will return to its original point (84 mkm)? Yes
VII. Why? Because the Planet orbital distance is defined relative to its diameter (and Mass) Mars now is in the wrong Position- but forced to it because of the sun effect
Conclusion
(1) The Giant-impact hypothesis supports Mars migration Theory
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper Argument
The Sun Is A Result Of The Solar Planets Motions- i.e. The Planets Were Moving Before The Sun Creation -
-The Paper compares between the solar system before & after The Sun Creation.
-The Paper asks "How did the planets move before The Sun Creation?"
-A Conclusion– The Sun is The Planets Motions Result and NOT The Reason.
Before The Sun Creation
The Solar Planets Order Was As Following
-Mercury (Where Pluto was The Mercury Moon) – then Mars –then Venus – Then Earth- The Uranus – Then Neptune – Then Jupiter –
After The Sun Creation
-The Planet Saturn Is Created
-Mars had migrated from its original orbital distance (84 mkm) to (227.9 mkm)
-Pluto had migrated from its original point (The Mercury Moon) to (5906 mkm) – and Pluto collided with Neptune and from this collision debris Pluto had created its moons and The Kuiper Belt is Created
Mars Migration Theory Revision:
-Mars original orbital distance was 84 mkm. and Mars had migrated to 227.9 mkm
-Through Mars Motion from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm, Mars had collided with Venus and then Mars had collided with Earth also.
-From the Collisions debris The Earth Moon was created –and Mars had found its moons. And the rest debris had attracted by Jupiter and created The Asteroid Belt
The Giant-Impact Hypothesis is in consistency with Mars migration theory
But
-Instead of the (Supposed Planet) Theia, Mars itself made the collisions.
Mars migration Theory solves The Giant-Impact Hypothesis difficulties:
I.Why Venus has No Moon? – Because Mars had migrated and moved from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm and pushed all debris in its motion direction – far from Venus – So Venus had found no debris around to create its own Moon - But Earth has a greater Mass and the debris lost their motion high momentum at Earth Position– so Earth could attract some debris and create its moon
II.The Lunar Magma Ocean (LMO) Origin– is Venus – because the moon is created by 3 planets debris (Venus – Earth – Mars) – So their rocks are found in it
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
This paper tries to answer 3 questions
(1st Question) Can "The Giant –Impact Hypothesis" provide a complete explanation for the Earth Moon Origin and Creation?
(2nd Question) Can Mars Immigration cause a risk on Earth?
(3rd Question) If Mars cause a risk on Earth, can the human save his life?
(Question No.1)
"Mars Immigration Theory Summary":
- Mars original orbital distance was 84 mkm. and Mars had immigrated from it to its current orbital distance 227.9 mkm
- Through Mars Motion from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm, Mars had collided with Venus and then Mars had collided with Earth also.
- From the Collisions debris Earth Moon was created –and Mars had found its moons. And the rest debris was attracted by Jupiter and created The Asteroid Belt
The Giant-impact hypothesis is in consistency with Mars immigration theory
But
- Instead of the (Supposed Planet) Theia, Mars itself made the collisions- and caused the Earth –Moon Creation -
Mars Immigration Theory solves The difficulties of Giant-impact hypothesis:
I. Why Venus Has No Moon? – Because Mars moved from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm and pushed all debris in its motion direction – far from Venus – but Earth has greater Mass and the debris lost their motion high momentum – so Earth could attract some debris and create its moon
II. The Lunar Magma Ocean (LMO) Origin– is Venus – because the moon is created by 3 planets debris (Venus – Earth – Mars) – So their rocks are found in it
III. Why The Iron Oxide (Feo) of the Moon= (13%)? Because The rate (13%) is a middle between Mars rate (18%) and the terrestrial mantle (8%).
IV. Why Mars diameter (and Mass) are decreased through the history? Because of the collisions – Mars diameter lost around (5%) (and Mars mass also which causes difficulties for Mars gravitation equation)
V. Why Mars was immigrated? Because of The Sun Creation Process
(A Conclusion: Giant-impact hypothesis supports Mars Immigration Theory)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Why couldn't Titius Bode Law predict Neptune’s orbital distanceGerges francis
Paper Question
Why couldn't Titius Bode Law predict Neptune’s orbital distance?
-Because – Mars and Pluto had migrated from their original orbital distances –Mars had Migrated from (84 mkm) to (227.9 mkm) and Pluto was The Mercury moon (58mkm) and had migrated to (5906 mkm) which was Neptune Position- Pluto had collided with Neptune and occupied its position –that's why Titius Bode Law predicts correctly Pluto orbital distance – because it's Neptune one and Pluto occupied it.
-From Pluto Neptune Collisions Debris The Kuiper belt is Created
Let's remember Mars Migration Theory in following…
Mars Migration Theory Revision:
-Mars original orbital distance was 84 mkm. and Mars had migrated from it to its current orbital distance 227.9 mkm
-Through Mars Motion from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm, Mars had collided with Venus and then Mars had collided with Earth also.
-From the Collisions debris The Earth Moon was created –and Mars had found its moons. And the rest debris had attracted by Jupiter and created The Asteroid Belt
The Giant-Impact Hypothesis is in consistency with Mars migration theory
But
-Instead of the (Supposed Planet) Theia, Mars itself made the collisions- and caused the Earth –Moon Creation – through Mars Motion from (84 mkm) to (227.9 mkm)
Mars migration Theory solves The Giant-Impact Hypothesis difficulties:
I.Why Venus Has No Moon? – Because Mars had migrated and moved from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm and pushed all debris in its motion direction – far from Venus – So Venus had found no debris around to create its own Moon - But Earth has a greater Mass and the debris lost their motion high momentum at Earth Position– so Earth could attract some debris and create its moon
II.The Lunar Magma Ocean (LMO) Origin– is Venus – because the moon is created by 3 planets debris (Venus – Earth – Mars) – So their rocks are found in it
III.Why The Iron Oxide (Feo) of the Moon= (13%)? Because The rate (13%) is a middle between Mars rate (18%) and the terrestrial mantle (8%).
IV.Why Mars diameter (and Mass) are decreased through the history? Because of the collisions – Mars diameter lost around ( 4.1 %) (And Mars mass also which causes difficulties for Mars gravitation equation)
V.Mars migration is done Because of The Sun Creation Process
VI.Is there a possibility that Mars will return to its original point (84 mkm)? Yes
VII.Why? Because the Planet orbital distance is defined relative to its diameter (and Mass) Mars now is in the wrong Position- but forced to it because of the sun effect
Conclusion
(1)The Giant-impact hypothesis supports Mars migration Theory
Paper Objectives:
The paper tries to prove that – Pluto Now Occupies Neptune Position in the sky – where Pluto was The Mercury Moon and had to migrate because of the Sun Creation
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper Hypotheses
1-The Sun Position in the sky is defined relative to Uranus Position. this geometrical feature is a unique one for Uranus.
2-Uranus had effected on Mars and caused Mars to migrate from its original orbital distance (84 mkm) to its current one (227.9 mkm).
3-The Cycle 2737 years is a real astronomical cycle and related to Mars Migration.
Let's Review Mars Migration Theory in following:
Mars Migration Theory Revision:
-Mars original orbital distance was 84 mkm. and Mars had migrated from it to its current orbital distance 227.9 mkm
-Through Mars Motion from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm, Mars had collided with Venus and then Mars had collided with Earth also.
-From the Collisions debris The Earth Moon was created –and Mars had found its moons. And the rest debris had attracted by Jupiter and created The Asteroid Belt
The Giant-Impact Hypothesis is in consistency with Mars migration theory
But
-Instead of the (Supposed Planet) Theia, Mars itself made the collisions- and caused the Earth –Moon Creation – through Mars Motion from (84 mkm) to (227.9 mkm)
Mars migration Theory solves The Giant-Impact Hypothesis difficulties:
I.Why Venus Has No Moon? – Because Mars had migrated and moved from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm and pushed all debris in its motion direction – far from Venus – So Venus had found no debris around to create its own Moon - But Earth has a greater Mass and the debris lost their motion high momentum at Earth Position– so Earth could attract some debris and create its moon
II.The Lunar Magma Ocean (LMO) Origin– is Venus – because the moon is created by 3 planets debris (Venus – Earth – Mars) – So their rocks are found in it
III.Why The Iron Oxide (Feo) of the Moon= (13%)? Because The rate (13%) is a middle between Mars rate (18%) and the terrestrial mantle (8%).
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Why Mars had immigrated with the Sun Creation Gerges francis
The Paper Hypothesis:
Because of The Sun Creation- Mars had immigrated from its original orbital distance (84mkm) to its current one (227.9 mkm)- after its Immigration– Mars had created configurations for its Data with the other planets –i.e. – Many Planets had changed their (own) data to be in configuration with Mars Data (Orbital Distance) – and because of these Data changes we could - through Planets Data analysis - conclude and prove Mars Immigration event through the solar system history.
Mars Immigration Theory Revision:
- Mars original orbital distance was 84 mkm. and Mars had immigrated from it to its current orbital distance 227.9 mkm
- Through Mars Motion from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm, Mars had collided with Venus and then Mars had collided with Earth also.
- From the Collisions debris The Earth Moon was created –and Mars had found its moons. And the rest debris had attracted by Jupiter and created The Asteroid Belt
The Giant-Impact Hypothesis is in consistency with Mars immigration theory
But
- Instead of the (Supposed Planet) Theia, Mars itself made the collisions- and caused the Earth –Moon Creation – through Mars Motion from (84 mkm) to (227.9 mkm)
Mars Immigration Theory solves The Giant-Impact Hypothesis difficulties:
I. Why Venus Has No Moon? – Because Mars had immigrated and moved from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm and pushed all debris in its motion direction – far from Venus – So Venus had found no debris around to create its own Moon - But Earth has a greater Mass and the debris lost their motion high momentum at Earth Position– so Earth could attract some debris and create its moon
II. The Lunar Magma Ocean (LMO) Origin– is Venus – because the moon is created by 3 planets debris (Venus – Earth – Mars) – So their rocks are found in it
III. Why The Iron Oxide (Feo) of the Moon= (13%)? Because The rate (13%) is a middle between Mars rate (18%) and the terrestrial mantle (8%).
IV. Why Mars diameter (and Mass) are decreased through the history? Because of the collisions – Mars diameter lost around ( 4.1 %) (And Mars mass also which causes difficulties for Mars gravitation equation)
V. Mars Immigration is done Because of The Sun Creation Process
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Abstract
Solar Group Creation And Motion
(A description which this paper tries to prove)
1- The Solar System Is created of one energy only - this one energy travels through the solar group from point to another point – creating the planet matter (because E=mc2) and planet orbital distance (because Space = Energy- My Hypothesis).
2- The Solar System Main Energy starts from Jupiter and travels to Pluto (from this energy Neptune orbital circumference is created consuming 16% of the total energy)
3- Neptune reflects the rest of energy toward the inner planets into 2 equal trajectories of energy
4- The Energy is sent from Neptune (and Pluto) to Mercury
5- Energy is sent from Mercury to Saturn
6- Pluto Motion specifically for 1 solar day depends on light motion for 1 second (where this moving light velocity =1.16 mkm/sec – my hypothesis) – that means – 1 second of light motion causes Pluto to move 1 solar day
7- Solar group is created based on Pluto motion for 1 solar day (solar planets diameters total = 406000km= Pluto motion for 1 solar day)
8- Planets motions energies accumulations with 2 other factor effects – lead to produce the sun light beams… these 2 factors are
a. The sun rate of time is different from Earth one
b. Jupiter Energy Interaction with the planets velocities total
9- i.e. Planets Motions energies total produce the sun rays based on changing the sun rate of time and the interaction with Jupiter energy
10- The produce light beam will be 0.3 mkm/second but the original one is 1.16 mkm/sec – for that – the value 0.3 will multiply with 4……(0.3x4 =1.2 mkm/sec from this value the original light beam 1.16 mkm/sec is produced) (Why it multiplies with 4 - because earth has a cycle of 4 years – 1461 days)
11- The final product will be 1.16 mkm/sec moves for 1 second only to repeat the cycle for tomorrow…
Precession Cycle Effect
Earth orbital distance =149.6 mkm – the light (0.3mkm/sec) needs around 500 seconds to pass this distance… Why?
Paper Hypotheses
Because
(1) Solar Group is one Trajectory of Energy – through which the Energy transports from point to another
(2) Pluto sends The Energy To Earth
(3) Pluto motion depends on a period =500 seconds – using by light beam with velocity =1.16 mkm/sec
(4) Earth motion depends on a period =500 seconds – using by light beam with velocity =0.3 mkm/sec
(5) The period 500 seconds is sent with Pluto energy to Earth
(6) The sending energy causes Pluto and Earth data harmony
The paper tries to prove these facts
The paper adds more data to prove the same concept that
"Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion"
Let's review this concept argument in following:
-Why did I suggest that "Planet Motion depends on light Motion?"
-The main reason is that
-"Planet Motion Shows Geometrical Rules And Interactions Can't Be Explained By The Rigid Body Motion Mechanics"
-Planet Motion shows complex geometrical structures can't be found in the Rigid Body Motion Mechanics
In the previous paper "Could Plato Cave Be A Fact? (II)" I have provided 9 geometrical features are observed in the solar system geometry which can't be found by the rigid body motion mechanics
And
In the previous paper "Could Plato Cave Be A Fact? (III)" I have provided many questions and a theoretical investigation concerning this same concept
In this paper I provide more data which can support the concept clearly
Now … If really "Planet Motion depends On Light Motion" that will explain clearly Plato cave because we see the planets motions while the light motions are found hidden behind these planets motions and because of that we are prisoners in the cave
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Giant-impact hypothesis supports Mars Immigration Theory
Mars Immigration Theory Summary:
- Mars original orbital distance was 84 mkm but Mars was immigrated from it to its current orbital distance 227.9 mkm
- Through Mars Motion from the point 84 mkm to the point 227.9 mkm – Mars had collided with Venus (at first) and then collided also with Earth (at second)
- From these collisions debris Earth Moon was created and Mars created its moons and the rest debris were attracted by Jupiter and created the asteroid belt
Based on that
- Mars was the planet which collided with Earth and Not Theia (Theia impact) as the Giant-Impact Hypothesis suggests
The theory answers many questions to improve the Giant –impact hypothesis:
(1st Question) Why Venus has no moon spite it had a similar collision?
Because Mars was moving from the point (84 mkm) to the point (227.9 mkm) – So Mars pushed all debris to move with it in the same motion direction – Mars had created a wave to push all debris far from Venues toward Mars current orbital distance (227.9 mkm)- for that reason Venus Couldn't Create A Moon – but Earth has A Greater Mass and the Debris Lost Their Motion High Momentum at Earth – so Earth could created its moon from these debris
(2nd Question) The Lunar Magma Ocean (LMO) Origin?!
The Origin Of This Ocean Is Venus and by that – the mystery is solved easily – the moon rocks are consisted of 3 planets rocks which are Venus – Earth - Mars – and because of that the 3 planets rocks are seen among the moon rocks.
(3rd Question) why The Iron Oxide (Feo) of the Moon= (13%)?
The rate (13%) is a middle between Mars rate (18%) and the terrestrial mantle (8%) because the moon is created by all of them.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Space is Energy
This fact can be proved directly by Earth Jupiter Distance Analysis (627 million km)
That means the matter and distance are created from Energy regardless their different forms (The sun rays is different from the oil but both are energy)
This fact supports the main idea in my research that:
The solar group is a trajectory of Energy and each planet is a point on this trajectory.
Why Jupiter Diameter =142984 km (Part 2) (Revised)Gerges francis
This Paper discusses the following hypothesis:
("2A" are needed for "1B")
The Previous Rule Controls The Solar Planets Basic Data
Hypothesis Explanation
It tells – all basic solar planets data are created based on the previous rule – we need 2 Equal Values to interact with 1 different Value…
Example (No. 1)
Solar Planets Diameters Total = 2 Jupiter Diameters + 1 Saturn Diameter
How To Understand The Previous Idea:
Solar Group Is One Trajectory of Energy – Each Planet Is A Point On It
a. The Planet Matter (Mass) is Created of Energy (E=mc2supports that)
b. The Planet Orbital Distance (Space) is Created of Energy (Hypothesis)
Solar Group can be similar to one machine each plant is a gear in it (or one body and each planet is a member of this same body)
The Solar Group is Created from only One Energy
The Solar Planets and their orbital distances are created depending on Each Other
The basic solar planets data are created based on this rule ("2A" for "1B")
How The Matter Is Created?
Why the particle has double nature?
What's The Gravity Reason And Mechanism?
Does the gravity needs time to effect or works instantly?
If the Planet moves by gravity, why does the moon revolve the Metonic Cycle which the Earth doesn't?
The Matter Creation is the main question I discuss in this paper, tries to explain why the Particle has double nature..
The Main Hypothesis:
"The Matter Is Made Of Light"
Paper hypothesis:
-The Earth moon is found inside an interaction occurred between Mercury and Jupiter Motions, because of that, the moon orbital motion can't be explained independent from Mercury and Jupiter Motions.
The hypothesis Explanation
- The hypothesis tells that, Mercury and Jupiter motions effect on the moon motion and creates features can't be explained independent of Mercury and Jupiter Motions effect.
- The claim refers to that, the moon orbital motion is done based on geometrical rules that means, the moon moves by gravity force by not in a direct effect but through geometrical rules, to explain that, let's imagine a car moves on a track and this track has walls on both sides, so the car has one option only to move forward, so this motion of car is done by its motor but if the walls aren't found the car could move in different directions but now the car has only one option – similar to that- the moon moves by gravity forces but in a geometrical designed track and because of that the moon has only limited options to do its motion- by that – the motion doesn't depend on gravity forces only but also on the track geometrical design.
Paper objective
- The paper analyzes the moon orbital motion track geometrical design and rules.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
1. The Main Hypothesis: The Matter Is Created From The Light
2. The produced matter is created in motion, that means the solar planets are created in motions (regardless the motion reason)
3. The solar group are a group of motions conveyors, So the motions of all solar planets are depended on each other
4. The solar group motions aim to create a difference in motion velocity = C between 2 points in the group.
5. i.e. The Solar Planets work as gears or conveyors group, transfer the motion from point to another point, aiming to create a difference in motion velocity = C velocity. And that's happening where the solar group motions create a difference in velocities between the Earth and Sun motions = C velocity (for that reason the sun is our source of light)
6. The solar group is A Dipole System has 2 heads (the sun and the Earth)
7. The light Production by the planets motions (i.e. by transferring of the mechanical waves into light waves), the original source of light beams energy, from which the solar planets were created, will be conserved.
8. Because there's a difference in velocity = C between 2 points in the solar group (the sun and the Earth), we may conclude easily that, there's more than one frame in the solar group.
9. To create a difference of velocity = C, all solar planets should revolve around the dipole line (The Sun-Earth Line) in the same direction, enabling the velocities addition process to gather all motions in the same point…
10. The Produced Solar Planets should have relationships between their Geometrical structures (if they were created from the light), so the planets are not created independent but related to each other geometrically.
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- Pluto And The Moon Motions Are Effected By The Earth Motion.
The hypothesis Explanation
- I use the planets data analysis to discover the solar planets creation and motions.
- The planets data shows the following fact….
- Pluto Day Period be =153.3 hours because Pluto day period depends on The Earth moon day period (708.7h). That explains why Pluto day period is so long in comparison with the outer planets days periods. The fact is that, Pluto day period is created as a function in the Earth Moon Day Period.
- On the other side, the moon orbital apogee radius which should be = 413600 km became =406000 km because of Pluto motion effect on the moon orbital motion.
- Paper Objective
- Because no physics theory can give an explanation for such dependency found between 2 small masses planets which are at a huge distance between them, I have to prove this dependency between the 2 planets by all means. And as a result for these proves, we have to search after the method by which this dependency can be created.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
My Research Hypotheses
Abstract
During 2013-2019 I have studied the solar system geometry. Based on this study I have formed the following 5 basic hypotheses:
Hypothesis No.1
Solar System is One building (or one machine) and each planet is a part of this same building.
Hypothesis No.2
Solar System moves as a train. i.e. A train moves with all its carriages together, similar to that – Solar Planets move together as one train in one unified motion (i.e. No Planet moves individually or independently from other planets motions)
Hypothesis No.3
Planet motion for 1 solar day depends on energy of light motion for 1 second period – that means – Planet moves following light motion – i.e. – Planet motion shows double motions – (1st) Light Motion (2nd) Its Follower Planet Motion
Hypothesis No.4
Solar System Unified Motion depends On Solar Day Period
Hypothesis No.5
Matter Creation process depends on solar day period of time – that means – Matter creation process depends on the time as one of its main components
In this paper I try to explain these 5 hypotheses and provide short proves for them
Jupiter and mercury motions analysis (revised) (2)Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper Argument
- Jupiter Motion analysis disproves Newton Theory of The Sun Mass Gravity and Planet Motion Independency Concept.
- Because
- Jupiter Motion depends on Mercury and Mars Cycles Periods
- This dependency proves that,
- The solar planets motions be integrated into One Unified Motion
- Means,
- The solar planets be similar to gears move in one machine they do their motions in comparison with each other, or
- The solar planets be similar to train carriages they move together One Unified General Motion
- The solar system distances be similar to railways be built by energy and the planets be similar to trains move on these railways
- Jupiter Motion analysis disproves Newton theory in 2 basic points which are
- (1) The Planet Motion Can't be Independent from the other planets motions
- (2) The Planet Motion Be done by the same force by which Planet Matter is created, Because the motion features be effective in Planet Matter Dimensions.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Paper hypothesis
The Earth Is Older Than The Sun
Paper Hypothesis Proves
1- The Solar Planets Order shows that- The Sun is A result of The Planets Motions and NOT Their Reason.
2- The Sun Data is Created depending on The Planets Data
3- The Solar System Chronological Events Proves That The Sun Is Created After The Planets Creation.
4- Saturn Data proves, "Saturn is The Only Planet Created After The Sun Creation"
There are 2 Basic Events were done Because Of The Sun Creation:
(1st Event) Mars Migration (2nd Event) Pluto Migration
Let's summarize these events general idea in following…
Pluto Migration
- Pluto was The Mercury Moon with orbital distance 57.9 mkm and had to migrate to 5906 mkm because of the sun creation –
- Pluto had collided with Neptune and from this collision debris Pluto had created its moons and The Kuiper Belt (The Paper discuss The Event Proves)
Mars Migration Theory Revision:
- Mars original orbital distance was 84 mkm. and Mars had migrated to 227.9 mkm
- Through Mars Motion from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm, Mars had collided with Venus and then Mars had collided with Earth also.
- From the Collisions debris The Earth Moon was created –and Mars had found its moons. And the rest debris had attracted by Jupiter and created The Asteroid Belt
The Giant-Impact Hypothesis is in consistency with Mars migration theory
But Instead of the (Supposed Planet) Theia, Mars itself made the collisions.
Mars migration Theory solves The Giant-Impact Hypothesis difficulties:
I. Why Venus has No Moon? – Because Mars had migrated and moved from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm and pushed all debris in its motion direction – far from Venus – So Venus had found no debris around to create its own Moon - But Earth has a greater Mass and the debris lost their motion high momentum at Earth Position– so Earth could attract some debris and create its moon
II. The Lunar Magma Ocean (LMO) Origin– is Venus – because the moon is created by 3 planets debris (Venus – Earth – Mars) – So their rocks are found in it
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
How Planet Velocity Be Defined?
Abstract
Paper Question
How Planet Velocity Be Defined?
Paper question explanation
(27.78 x π2/ 47.4 x2) = 2.86 (error 1%)
(35 x2 /24.1) = 2.86 (error 1.5%)
(4 x29.8 / 13.1π) = 2.86 (error 1.3%)
(27.78 /9.7) = 2.86 (Zero error)
(24.1 x 2 / 5.4 π) = 2.86 (error less 1%)
(2π x 13.1)/(5.4)2 = 2.86 (error 1.3%)
(9.7 x 2/6.8) = 2.86 (error less 1%)
(6.8 x 2/ 4.7) = 2.86 (error 1%)
(1.16/0.406) = 2.86 (Zero error)
- Where
- 47.4 km/s = Mercury velocity
- 35 km/s = Venus velocity
- 29.8 km/s = Earth velocity
- 27.78 km/s = The Earth Moon velocity
- 24.1 km/s = Mars velocity
- 13.1 km/s = Jupiter velocity
- 9.7 km/s = Saturn velocity
- 6.8 km/s = Uranus velocity
- 5.4 km/s = Neptune velocity
- 4.7 km/s = Pluto velocity
- 1.16 mkm = Jupiter motion distance during mars rotation period
- 0.406 mkm = Pluto motion distance during a solar day
- If The Planets Move By The Masses Gravity,
- Can All Planets Velocities Be Rated To One Another As Seen In The Equation, Where The Planets Masses Don't Show A Similar Proportionality?
Paper Objective
The paper disproves Newton Theory of the sun mass gravity and disproves the Mass gravity force generally as a reason for the solar planets motions?
(The paper analyzes the planets velocities equation in details)
(The moon velocity =27.78 km/s is proved in point no. 7-11 of the paper)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Curriculum Vitae http://vixra.org/abs/1902.0044
E-mail mrwaheid@gmail.com
Twitter https://twitter.com/GergesTawdrous1
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous/
Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a1
Quora https://www.quora.com/profile/Gerges-F-Tawdrous
Researchgate https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Gerges-Tawdrous
Researcherid https://publons.com/researcher/3510834/gerges-tawadrous/
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Google https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=2Y4ZdTUAAAAJ&hl=en
box https://app.box.com/s/47fwd0gshir636xt0i3wpso8lvvl8vnv
Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous
List of publications http://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrous
Slideshare https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis
Mercury Motion Data Analysis Disproves Newton Theory Gerges francis
Mercury Motion Data Analysis Disproves Newton Theory
Paper hypothesis
Saturn moves by a velocity = 0.99 c (where c = 300000 km per second)
Saturn almost moves by light velocity, and this high velocity motion creates relativistic effects in the solar system data
Paper hypothesis explanation
- Again
- I claim against Nobel Prize Decision for Physics 2021, because
- Saturn moves by light velocity, and
- No planet moves by the sun mass gravity, because, the matter is created out of light and moves with its parent light by using different rates of time. As a result, the solar planets motions use different rates of time, and by using these different rates of time, Saturn can travel by a velocity = 99% of light velocity (300000 km/s)
- Shortly
- Newton theory of the sun mass gravity is mistaken, and tenths of papers provided huge number of proves against this theory – now – the theory lived for 400 years spite its an imaginary idea and wrong in its principle - But
- The Nobel Prize Decision for Physics 2021 sees nothing of all that! they provide no help for any real progress in the solar system motion understudying. They save the wrong theory of Newton spite the planets data contradicts it frequently
- This paper provides one more feature of planets real motion disproving Newton Theory of the sun mass gravity – and providing a claim against the decision 2021–
- No one has the right to mislead the humanity to learn the lies in place of the real knowledge and facts. No one has the authority and no can face the responsibility of all human misleading and misguiding
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Paper question
How Does The Gravity work?
The Question Explanation
- The motion at distance is one basic question still needs a sufficient answer.
- The mass gravity concept gives us no geometrical mechanism or any explanation concerns the gravity works mechanism, so we don't know if the gravity needs time or works immediately, or if the gravity causes the space to be formed in some geometrical form to perform the gravity effect.
- We have only the word (gravity) which means, some mass will cause another mass to be moving at distance but no details how this motion is done …
- Venus and Saturn motions data gives some reference that these 2 planets motions depend on one another.
- How Venus and Saturn motions can be performed depending on each other? Whatsoever the answer is, it means, (some effect at distance) is found between these 2 planets.
- Can this effect be a reason for the motion at distance which we search for?
The paper analyzes the 2 planets motions data to see if such effect can be found between the 2 planets and How this effect can be transported from one planet to another?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar Planets Group is One Machine
This one machine cooperates together to enable the Earth to produce The Solar Day Time
Providing the life chance on the Earth..
This paper aims to prove this idea and explains this machine mechanism.
Jupiter And Mercury Motions Analysis (Revised)Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper Argument
- Jupiter Motion analysis disproves Newton Theory of The Sun Mass Gravity and Planet Motion Independency Concept.
- Because
- Jupiter Motion depends on Mercury and Mars Cycles Periods
- This dependency proves that,
- The solar planets motions be integrated into One Unified Motion
- Means,
- The solar planets be similar to gears move in one machine they do their motions in comparison with each other, or
- The solar planets be similar to train carriages they move together One Unified General Motion
- The solar system distances be similar to railways be built by energy and the planets be similar to trains move on these railways
- Jupiter Motion analysis disproves Newton theory in 2 basic points which are
- (1) The Planet Motion Can't be Independent from the other planets motions
- (2) The Planet Motion Be done by the same force by which Planet Matter is created, Because the motion features be effective in Planet Matter Dimensions.
Paper Conclusion
- The Solar System Distances Be Created In A Network Form And Based On One Geometrical Design.
- Means
- The distances be distributed based on geometrical design in comparison with other distances and no a single distance be created independent from the other distances
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Solar System Design Disproves Newton Theory (Revised No.2) Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Solar Planets Revolutions Around The Sun Be Done In Equal Periods of Time
Paper hypothesis Explanation
(I)
- The Solar Planets move as gears in one machine- each planet motion depends on the other planets motions.
- The solar planets motions be integrated with one another to create one unified integrated motion.
- The unified integrated motion causes the planets revolutions around the sun to be done in equal periods of time, to save the timing adjustments of the planets motions to be integrated with one another.
- The equal periods causes the planets motions to use different rates of time to adjust the planets orbital distances increasing and their velocities decreasing
- The equal periods of time and the using of the different rates of time causes the solar system distances to be created in a network form
- The distances network means, the distances be created based on one geometrical design and be distributed as a network.
- This vision attributes 3 new features to the solar planets motions which are:
- (1) The Planets Move An Integrated Unified Motion
- (2) The Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time
- (3) The Solar System Distances Be Created In A Network Form
- By that, the solar group be similar to a great mechanical clock, each planet works as a gear moves depending on the other planets motions and defines a part of the solar system general rate of time (the general rate of time is the solar day 86400s)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper question
Can Saturn Motion effect on Venus Motion?
The Question Explanation
- The gravitation equation gives no hope for a significant effect from Saturn motion on Venus motion because of the great distance between the 2 planets
- But
- The 2 planets data shows that the 2 planets motions must be effective on one another. The data gives no room for doubt concerning this significant effect.
- The dilemma arises 2 basic arguments…
- The first argument tells that, Saturn motion effects on Venus motion, and that necessitates to search behind the data to find the method by which Saturn motion can effect on Venus motion where this method should be considered as another method of planet motion effect on another planet motion in addition to the gravitation equation.
- The second argument tells, (The Motion Be Transported Among The Planets). This argument is so significant because it gives us a solution to answer (how the motion at distance be done?) – and this argument may help to find a definition for the space.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar Planets Order Still Shows More Puzzles Gerges francis
The Direct question is,
Why doesn't the solar planets order follow the gravitation equation?!
Where the sun mass is constant in all planets equation- that means – the planets should be ordered based on their masses from the great mass to the less one..
By this description Jupiter should be the most near planet to the sun
Of course that's not true ………….But
Jupiter and Saturn distances to the sun follow the gravitation equation!
((Satrun orbital distance)2 / (Jupiter orbital distance)2) = (Jupiter Mass/ Satrun Mass)
This equation tells that both Jupiter and Saturn follow the gravitation equation perfectly and also the greatest mass is more near to the sun…
But no other planets follow it!! The Equation doesn't work! Why?!
Because
Mars original orbital distance was 84 mkm and Mars had immigrated from it to its new orbital distance 227.9 mkm – Through this Motion from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm Mars had collided with Venus and after that Mars had collided also with Earth
From these Collisions debris Earth Moon is created –from the debris Mars had found its moons and the rest debris were attracted by Jupiter, creating The Asteroid Belt –
This Theory solves many questions in the Giant –impact hypothesis
- The Lunar Magma Ocean (LMO) Origin– is Venus – because the moon is created by 3 planets debris – that's why the three planets rock are found…
- why Venus has no moon? this also is solved – because Mars moved from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm and pushed all debris with its motion direction – far from Venus – but Earth has greater Mass and the debris lost thei high momentum – so Earth could attrackt some debris and create its moon
- why The Iron Oxide (Feo) of the Moon= (13%)? This also is solved because The rate (13%) is a middle between Mars rate (18%) and the terrestrial mantle (8%).
- i.e. The Giant-impact hypothesis supports Mars Immgrtion Theory
The Conclusion : The Solar Planets Order Proves Mars Immigration Theory
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Earth is older than the Sun–So what changes had happened resulting the sun creation?
We know one change is happened because of the sun Creation which is:
Mars had immigrated from (84 mkm) to (227.9 mkm) – Let's remember that:
Mars Immigration Theory:
- Mars original orbital distance was 84 mkm. and Mars had immigrated from it to its current orbital distance 227.9 mkm
- Through Mars Motion from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm, Mars had collided with Venus and then Mars had collided with Earth also.
- From the Collisions debris Earth Moon was created –and Mars had found its moons. And the rest debris was attracted by Jupiter and created The Asteroid Belt
The Giant-impact hypothesis is in consistency with Mars immigration theory
But
- Instead of the (Supposed Planet) Theia, Mars itself made the collisions- and caused the Earth –Moon Creation -
Mars Immigration Theory solves The difficulties of Giant-impact hypothesis:
I. Why Venus Has No Moon? – Because Mars moved from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm and pushed all debris in its motion direction – far from Venus – but Earth has greater Mass and the debris lost their motion high momentum – so Earth could attract some debris and create its moon
II. The Lunar Magma Ocean (LMO) Origin– is Venus – because the moon is created by 3 planets debris (Venus – Earth – Mars) – So their rocks are found in it
III. Why The Iron Oxide (Feo) of the Moon= (13%)? Because The rate (13%) is a middle between Mars rate (18%) and the terrestrial mantle (8%).
IV. Why Mars diameter (and Mass) are decreased through the history? Because of the collisions – Mars diameter lost around (5%) (and Mars mass also which causes difficulties for Mars gravitation equation)
V. Mars Immigration is done Because of The Sun Creation Process
VI. Is there a possibility that Mars will return to its original point (84 mkm)? Yes
VII. Why? Because the Planet orbital distance is defined relative to its diameter (and Mass) – Mars now is found in a wrong Position.
Giant-impact hypothesis supports Mars Immigration Theory
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The paper adds more data to prove the same concept that
"Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion"
Let's review this concept argument in following:
-Why did I suggest that "Planet Motion depends on light Motion?"
-The main reason is that
-"Planet Motion Shows Geometrical Rules And Interactions Can't Be Explained By The Rigid Body Motion Mechanics"
-Planet Motion shows complex geometrical structures can't be found in the Rigid Body Motion Mechanics
In the previous paper "Could Plato Cave Be A Fact? (II)" I have provided 9 geometrical features are observed in the solar system geometry which can't be found by the rigid body motion mechanics
And
In the previous paper "Could Plato Cave Be A Fact? (III)" I have provided many questions and a theoretical investigation concerning this same concept
In this paper I provide more data which can support the concept clearly
Now … If really "Planet Motion depends On Light Motion" that will explain clearly Plato cave because we see the planets motions while the light motions are found hidden behind these planets motions and because of that we are prisoners in the cave
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Giant-impact hypothesis supports Mars Immigration Theory
Mars Immigration Theory Summary:
- Mars original orbital distance was 84 mkm but Mars was immigrated from it to its current orbital distance 227.9 mkm
- Through Mars Motion from the point 84 mkm to the point 227.9 mkm – Mars had collided with Venus (at first) and then collided also with Earth (at second)
- From these collisions debris Earth Moon was created and Mars created its moons and the rest debris were attracted by Jupiter and created the asteroid belt
Based on that
- Mars was the planet which collided with Earth and Not Theia (Theia impact) as the Giant-Impact Hypothesis suggests
The theory answers many questions to improve the Giant –impact hypothesis:
(1st Question) Why Venus has no moon spite it had a similar collision?
Because Mars was moving from the point (84 mkm) to the point (227.9 mkm) – So Mars pushed all debris to move with it in the same motion direction – Mars had created a wave to push all debris far from Venues toward Mars current orbital distance (227.9 mkm)- for that reason Venus Couldn't Create A Moon – but Earth has A Greater Mass and the Debris Lost Their Motion High Momentum at Earth – so Earth could created its moon from these debris
(2nd Question) The Lunar Magma Ocean (LMO) Origin?!
The Origin Of This Ocean Is Venus and by that – the mystery is solved easily – the moon rocks are consisted of 3 planets rocks which are Venus – Earth - Mars – and because of that the 3 planets rocks are seen among the moon rocks.
(3rd Question) why The Iron Oxide (Feo) of the Moon= (13%)?
The rate (13%) is a middle between Mars rate (18%) and the terrestrial mantle (8%) because the moon is created by all of them.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Space is Energy
This fact can be proved directly by Earth Jupiter Distance Analysis (627 million km)
That means the matter and distance are created from Energy regardless their different forms (The sun rays is different from the oil but both are energy)
This fact supports the main idea in my research that:
The solar group is a trajectory of Energy and each planet is a point on this trajectory.
Why Jupiter Diameter =142984 km (Part 2) (Revised)Gerges francis
This Paper discusses the following hypothesis:
("2A" are needed for "1B")
The Previous Rule Controls The Solar Planets Basic Data
Hypothesis Explanation
It tells – all basic solar planets data are created based on the previous rule – we need 2 Equal Values to interact with 1 different Value…
Example (No. 1)
Solar Planets Diameters Total = 2 Jupiter Diameters + 1 Saturn Diameter
How To Understand The Previous Idea:
Solar Group Is One Trajectory of Energy – Each Planet Is A Point On It
a. The Planet Matter (Mass) is Created of Energy (E=mc2supports that)
b. The Planet Orbital Distance (Space) is Created of Energy (Hypothesis)
Solar Group can be similar to one machine each plant is a gear in it (or one body and each planet is a member of this same body)
The Solar Group is Created from only One Energy
The Solar Planets and their orbital distances are created depending on Each Other
The basic solar planets data are created based on this rule ("2A" for "1B")
How The Matter Is Created?
Why the particle has double nature?
What's The Gravity Reason And Mechanism?
Does the gravity needs time to effect or works instantly?
If the Planet moves by gravity, why does the moon revolve the Metonic Cycle which the Earth doesn't?
The Matter Creation is the main question I discuss in this paper, tries to explain why the Particle has double nature..
The Main Hypothesis:
"The Matter Is Made Of Light"
Paper hypothesis:
-The Earth moon is found inside an interaction occurred between Mercury and Jupiter Motions, because of that, the moon orbital motion can't be explained independent from Mercury and Jupiter Motions.
The hypothesis Explanation
- The hypothesis tells that, Mercury and Jupiter motions effect on the moon motion and creates features can't be explained independent of Mercury and Jupiter Motions effect.
- The claim refers to that, the moon orbital motion is done based on geometrical rules that means, the moon moves by gravity force by not in a direct effect but through geometrical rules, to explain that, let's imagine a car moves on a track and this track has walls on both sides, so the car has one option only to move forward, so this motion of car is done by its motor but if the walls aren't found the car could move in different directions but now the car has only one option – similar to that- the moon moves by gravity forces but in a geometrical designed track and because of that the moon has only limited options to do its motion- by that – the motion doesn't depend on gravity forces only but also on the track geometrical design.
Paper objective
- The paper analyzes the moon orbital motion track geometrical design and rules.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
1. The Main Hypothesis: The Matter Is Created From The Light
2. The produced matter is created in motion, that means the solar planets are created in motions (regardless the motion reason)
3. The solar group are a group of motions conveyors, So the motions of all solar planets are depended on each other
4. The solar group motions aim to create a difference in motion velocity = C between 2 points in the group.
5. i.e. The Solar Planets work as gears or conveyors group, transfer the motion from point to another point, aiming to create a difference in motion velocity = C velocity. And that's happening where the solar group motions create a difference in velocities between the Earth and Sun motions = C velocity (for that reason the sun is our source of light)
6. The solar group is A Dipole System has 2 heads (the sun and the Earth)
7. The light Production by the planets motions (i.e. by transferring of the mechanical waves into light waves), the original source of light beams energy, from which the solar planets were created, will be conserved.
8. Because there's a difference in velocity = C between 2 points in the solar group (the sun and the Earth), we may conclude easily that, there's more than one frame in the solar group.
9. To create a difference of velocity = C, all solar planets should revolve around the dipole line (The Sun-Earth Line) in the same direction, enabling the velocities addition process to gather all motions in the same point…
10. The Produced Solar Planets should have relationships between their Geometrical structures (if they were created from the light), so the planets are not created independent but related to each other geometrically.
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- Pluto And The Moon Motions Are Effected By The Earth Motion.
The hypothesis Explanation
- I use the planets data analysis to discover the solar planets creation and motions.
- The planets data shows the following fact….
- Pluto Day Period be =153.3 hours because Pluto day period depends on The Earth moon day period (708.7h). That explains why Pluto day period is so long in comparison with the outer planets days periods. The fact is that, Pluto day period is created as a function in the Earth Moon Day Period.
- On the other side, the moon orbital apogee radius which should be = 413600 km became =406000 km because of Pluto motion effect on the moon orbital motion.
- Paper Objective
- Because no physics theory can give an explanation for such dependency found between 2 small masses planets which are at a huge distance between them, I have to prove this dependency between the 2 planets by all means. And as a result for these proves, we have to search after the method by which this dependency can be created.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
My Research Hypotheses
Abstract
During 2013-2019 I have studied the solar system geometry. Based on this study I have formed the following 5 basic hypotheses:
Hypothesis No.1
Solar System is One building (or one machine) and each planet is a part of this same building.
Hypothesis No.2
Solar System moves as a train. i.e. A train moves with all its carriages together, similar to that – Solar Planets move together as one train in one unified motion (i.e. No Planet moves individually or independently from other planets motions)
Hypothesis No.3
Planet motion for 1 solar day depends on energy of light motion for 1 second period – that means – Planet moves following light motion – i.e. – Planet motion shows double motions – (1st) Light Motion (2nd) Its Follower Planet Motion
Hypothesis No.4
Solar System Unified Motion depends On Solar Day Period
Hypothesis No.5
Matter Creation process depends on solar day period of time – that means – Matter creation process depends on the time as one of its main components
In this paper I try to explain these 5 hypotheses and provide short proves for them
Jupiter and mercury motions analysis (revised) (2)Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper Argument
- Jupiter Motion analysis disproves Newton Theory of The Sun Mass Gravity and Planet Motion Independency Concept.
- Because
- Jupiter Motion depends on Mercury and Mars Cycles Periods
- This dependency proves that,
- The solar planets motions be integrated into One Unified Motion
- Means,
- The solar planets be similar to gears move in one machine they do their motions in comparison with each other, or
- The solar planets be similar to train carriages they move together One Unified General Motion
- The solar system distances be similar to railways be built by energy and the planets be similar to trains move on these railways
- Jupiter Motion analysis disproves Newton theory in 2 basic points which are
- (1) The Planet Motion Can't be Independent from the other planets motions
- (2) The Planet Motion Be done by the same force by which Planet Matter is created, Because the motion features be effective in Planet Matter Dimensions.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Paper hypothesis
The Earth Is Older Than The Sun
Paper Hypothesis Proves
1- The Solar Planets Order shows that- The Sun is A result of The Planets Motions and NOT Their Reason.
2- The Sun Data is Created depending on The Planets Data
3- The Solar System Chronological Events Proves That The Sun Is Created After The Planets Creation.
4- Saturn Data proves, "Saturn is The Only Planet Created After The Sun Creation"
There are 2 Basic Events were done Because Of The Sun Creation:
(1st Event) Mars Migration (2nd Event) Pluto Migration
Let's summarize these events general idea in following…
Pluto Migration
- Pluto was The Mercury Moon with orbital distance 57.9 mkm and had to migrate to 5906 mkm because of the sun creation –
- Pluto had collided with Neptune and from this collision debris Pluto had created its moons and The Kuiper Belt (The Paper discuss The Event Proves)
Mars Migration Theory Revision:
- Mars original orbital distance was 84 mkm. and Mars had migrated to 227.9 mkm
- Through Mars Motion from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm, Mars had collided with Venus and then Mars had collided with Earth also.
- From the Collisions debris The Earth Moon was created –and Mars had found its moons. And the rest debris had attracted by Jupiter and created The Asteroid Belt
The Giant-Impact Hypothesis is in consistency with Mars migration theory
But Instead of the (Supposed Planet) Theia, Mars itself made the collisions.
Mars migration Theory solves The Giant-Impact Hypothesis difficulties:
I. Why Venus has No Moon? – Because Mars had migrated and moved from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm and pushed all debris in its motion direction – far from Venus – So Venus had found no debris around to create its own Moon - But Earth has a greater Mass and the debris lost their motion high momentum at Earth Position– so Earth could attract some debris and create its moon
II. The Lunar Magma Ocean (LMO) Origin– is Venus – because the moon is created by 3 planets debris (Venus – Earth – Mars) – So their rocks are found in it
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
How Planet Velocity Be Defined?
Abstract
Paper Question
How Planet Velocity Be Defined?
Paper question explanation
(27.78 x π2/ 47.4 x2) = 2.86 (error 1%)
(35 x2 /24.1) = 2.86 (error 1.5%)
(4 x29.8 / 13.1π) = 2.86 (error 1.3%)
(27.78 /9.7) = 2.86 (Zero error)
(24.1 x 2 / 5.4 π) = 2.86 (error less 1%)
(2π x 13.1)/(5.4)2 = 2.86 (error 1.3%)
(9.7 x 2/6.8) = 2.86 (error less 1%)
(6.8 x 2/ 4.7) = 2.86 (error 1%)
(1.16/0.406) = 2.86 (Zero error)
- Where
- 47.4 km/s = Mercury velocity
- 35 km/s = Venus velocity
- 29.8 km/s = Earth velocity
- 27.78 km/s = The Earth Moon velocity
- 24.1 km/s = Mars velocity
- 13.1 km/s = Jupiter velocity
- 9.7 km/s = Saturn velocity
- 6.8 km/s = Uranus velocity
- 5.4 km/s = Neptune velocity
- 4.7 km/s = Pluto velocity
- 1.16 mkm = Jupiter motion distance during mars rotation period
- 0.406 mkm = Pluto motion distance during a solar day
- If The Planets Move By The Masses Gravity,
- Can All Planets Velocities Be Rated To One Another As Seen In The Equation, Where The Planets Masses Don't Show A Similar Proportionality?
Paper Objective
The paper disproves Newton Theory of the sun mass gravity and disproves the Mass gravity force generally as a reason for the solar planets motions?
(The paper analyzes the planets velocities equation in details)
(The moon velocity =27.78 km/s is proved in point no. 7-11 of the paper)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Curriculum Vitae http://vixra.org/abs/1902.0044
E-mail mrwaheid@gmail.com
Twitter https://twitter.com/GergesTawdrous1
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous/
Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a1
Quora https://www.quora.com/profile/Gerges-F-Tawdrous
Researchgate https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Gerges-Tawdrous
Researcherid https://publons.com/researcher/3510834/gerges-tawadrous/
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Google https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=2Y4ZdTUAAAAJ&hl=en
box https://app.box.com/s/47fwd0gshir636xt0i3wpso8lvvl8vnv
Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous
List of publications http://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrous
Slideshare https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis
Mercury Motion Data Analysis Disproves Newton Theory Gerges francis
Mercury Motion Data Analysis Disproves Newton Theory
Paper hypothesis
Saturn moves by a velocity = 0.99 c (where c = 300000 km per second)
Saturn almost moves by light velocity, and this high velocity motion creates relativistic effects in the solar system data
Paper hypothesis explanation
- Again
- I claim against Nobel Prize Decision for Physics 2021, because
- Saturn moves by light velocity, and
- No planet moves by the sun mass gravity, because, the matter is created out of light and moves with its parent light by using different rates of time. As a result, the solar planets motions use different rates of time, and by using these different rates of time, Saturn can travel by a velocity = 99% of light velocity (300000 km/s)
- Shortly
- Newton theory of the sun mass gravity is mistaken, and tenths of papers provided huge number of proves against this theory – now – the theory lived for 400 years spite its an imaginary idea and wrong in its principle - But
- The Nobel Prize Decision for Physics 2021 sees nothing of all that! they provide no help for any real progress in the solar system motion understudying. They save the wrong theory of Newton spite the planets data contradicts it frequently
- This paper provides one more feature of planets real motion disproving Newton Theory of the sun mass gravity – and providing a claim against the decision 2021–
- No one has the right to mislead the humanity to learn the lies in place of the real knowledge and facts. No one has the authority and no can face the responsibility of all human misleading and misguiding
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Paper question
How Does The Gravity work?
The Question Explanation
- The motion at distance is one basic question still needs a sufficient answer.
- The mass gravity concept gives us no geometrical mechanism or any explanation concerns the gravity works mechanism, so we don't know if the gravity needs time or works immediately, or if the gravity causes the space to be formed in some geometrical form to perform the gravity effect.
- We have only the word (gravity) which means, some mass will cause another mass to be moving at distance but no details how this motion is done …
- Venus and Saturn motions data gives some reference that these 2 planets motions depend on one another.
- How Venus and Saturn motions can be performed depending on each other? Whatsoever the answer is, it means, (some effect at distance) is found between these 2 planets.
- Can this effect be a reason for the motion at distance which we search for?
The paper analyzes the 2 planets motions data to see if such effect can be found between the 2 planets and How this effect can be transported from one planet to another?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar Planets Group is One Machine
This one machine cooperates together to enable the Earth to produce The Solar Day Time
Providing the life chance on the Earth..
This paper aims to prove this idea and explains this machine mechanism.
Jupiter And Mercury Motions Analysis (Revised)Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper Argument
- Jupiter Motion analysis disproves Newton Theory of The Sun Mass Gravity and Planet Motion Independency Concept.
- Because
- Jupiter Motion depends on Mercury and Mars Cycles Periods
- This dependency proves that,
- The solar planets motions be integrated into One Unified Motion
- Means,
- The solar planets be similar to gears move in one machine they do their motions in comparison with each other, or
- The solar planets be similar to train carriages they move together One Unified General Motion
- The solar system distances be similar to railways be built by energy and the planets be similar to trains move on these railways
- Jupiter Motion analysis disproves Newton theory in 2 basic points which are
- (1) The Planet Motion Can't be Independent from the other planets motions
- (2) The Planet Motion Be done by the same force by which Planet Matter is created, Because the motion features be effective in Planet Matter Dimensions.
Paper Conclusion
- The Solar System Distances Be Created In A Network Form And Based On One Geometrical Design.
- Means
- The distances be distributed based on geometrical design in comparison with other distances and no a single distance be created independent from the other distances
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Solar System Design Disproves Newton Theory (Revised No.2) Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Solar Planets Revolutions Around The Sun Be Done In Equal Periods of Time
Paper hypothesis Explanation
(I)
- The Solar Planets move as gears in one machine- each planet motion depends on the other planets motions.
- The solar planets motions be integrated with one another to create one unified integrated motion.
- The unified integrated motion causes the planets revolutions around the sun to be done in equal periods of time, to save the timing adjustments of the planets motions to be integrated with one another.
- The equal periods causes the planets motions to use different rates of time to adjust the planets orbital distances increasing and their velocities decreasing
- The equal periods of time and the using of the different rates of time causes the solar system distances to be created in a network form
- The distances network means, the distances be created based on one geometrical design and be distributed as a network.
- This vision attributes 3 new features to the solar planets motions which are:
- (1) The Planets Move An Integrated Unified Motion
- (2) The Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time
- (3) The Solar System Distances Be Created In A Network Form
- By that, the solar group be similar to a great mechanical clock, each planet works as a gear moves depending on the other planets motions and defines a part of the solar system general rate of time (the general rate of time is the solar day 86400s)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper question
Can Saturn Motion effect on Venus Motion?
The Question Explanation
- The gravitation equation gives no hope for a significant effect from Saturn motion on Venus motion because of the great distance between the 2 planets
- But
- The 2 planets data shows that the 2 planets motions must be effective on one another. The data gives no room for doubt concerning this significant effect.
- The dilemma arises 2 basic arguments…
- The first argument tells that, Saturn motion effects on Venus motion, and that necessitates to search behind the data to find the method by which Saturn motion can effect on Venus motion where this method should be considered as another method of planet motion effect on another planet motion in addition to the gravitation equation.
- The second argument tells, (The Motion Be Transported Among The Planets). This argument is so significant because it gives us a solution to answer (how the motion at distance be done?) – and this argument may help to find a definition for the space.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar Planets Order Still Shows More Puzzles Gerges francis
The Direct question is,
Why doesn't the solar planets order follow the gravitation equation?!
Where the sun mass is constant in all planets equation- that means – the planets should be ordered based on their masses from the great mass to the less one..
By this description Jupiter should be the most near planet to the sun
Of course that's not true ………….But
Jupiter and Saturn distances to the sun follow the gravitation equation!
((Satrun orbital distance)2 / (Jupiter orbital distance)2) = (Jupiter Mass/ Satrun Mass)
This equation tells that both Jupiter and Saturn follow the gravitation equation perfectly and also the greatest mass is more near to the sun…
But no other planets follow it!! The Equation doesn't work! Why?!
Because
Mars original orbital distance was 84 mkm and Mars had immigrated from it to its new orbital distance 227.9 mkm – Through this Motion from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm Mars had collided with Venus and after that Mars had collided also with Earth
From these Collisions debris Earth Moon is created –from the debris Mars had found its moons and the rest debris were attracted by Jupiter, creating The Asteroid Belt –
This Theory solves many questions in the Giant –impact hypothesis
- The Lunar Magma Ocean (LMO) Origin– is Venus – because the moon is created by 3 planets debris – that's why the three planets rock are found…
- why Venus has no moon? this also is solved – because Mars moved from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm and pushed all debris with its motion direction – far from Venus – but Earth has greater Mass and the debris lost thei high momentum – so Earth could attrackt some debris and create its moon
- why The Iron Oxide (Feo) of the Moon= (13%)? This also is solved because The rate (13%) is a middle between Mars rate (18%) and the terrestrial mantle (8%).
- i.e. The Giant-impact hypothesis supports Mars Immgrtion Theory
The Conclusion : The Solar Planets Order Proves Mars Immigration Theory
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Earth is older than the Sun–So what changes had happened resulting the sun creation?
We know one change is happened because of the sun Creation which is:
Mars had immigrated from (84 mkm) to (227.9 mkm) – Let's remember that:
Mars Immigration Theory:
- Mars original orbital distance was 84 mkm. and Mars had immigrated from it to its current orbital distance 227.9 mkm
- Through Mars Motion from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm, Mars had collided with Venus and then Mars had collided with Earth also.
- From the Collisions debris Earth Moon was created –and Mars had found its moons. And the rest debris was attracted by Jupiter and created The Asteroid Belt
The Giant-impact hypothesis is in consistency with Mars immigration theory
But
- Instead of the (Supposed Planet) Theia, Mars itself made the collisions- and caused the Earth –Moon Creation -
Mars Immigration Theory solves The difficulties of Giant-impact hypothesis:
I. Why Venus Has No Moon? – Because Mars moved from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm and pushed all debris in its motion direction – far from Venus – but Earth has greater Mass and the debris lost their motion high momentum – so Earth could attract some debris and create its moon
II. The Lunar Magma Ocean (LMO) Origin– is Venus – because the moon is created by 3 planets debris (Venus – Earth – Mars) – So their rocks are found in it
III. Why The Iron Oxide (Feo) of the Moon= (13%)? Because The rate (13%) is a middle between Mars rate (18%) and the terrestrial mantle (8%).
IV. Why Mars diameter (and Mass) are decreased through the history? Because of the collisions – Mars diameter lost around (5%) (and Mars mass also which causes difficulties for Mars gravitation equation)
V. Mars Immigration is done Because of The Sun Creation Process
VI. Is there a possibility that Mars will return to its original point (84 mkm)? Yes
VII. Why? Because the Planet orbital distance is defined relative to its diameter (and Mass) – Mars now is found in a wrong Position.
Giant-impact hypothesis supports Mars Immigration Theory
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
During December 2012 – there was a prediction for some great Earthquake will hit the Earth- this story is forgotten Now… But… I have found a similar earthquake in the solar system history –and I claim the Moon Creation is done based on it –
"Mars Immigration Theory Summary":
- Mars original orbital distance was 84 mkm. and Mars had immigrated from it to its current orbital distance 227.9 mkm
- Through Mars Motion from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm, Mars had collided with Venus and then Mars had collided with Earth also.
- From the Collisions debris Earth Moon was created –and Mars had found its moons. And the rest debris was attracted by Jupiter and created The Asteroid Belt
The Giant-impact hypothesis is in consistency with Mars immigration theory
But
- Instead of the (Supposed Planet) Theia, Mars itself made the collisions- and caused the Earth –Moon Creation -
Mars Immigration Theory solves The difficulties of Giant-impact hypothesis:
I. Why Venus Has No Moon? – Because Mars moved from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm and pushed all debris in its motion direction – far from Venus – but Earth has greater Mass and the debris lost their motion high momentum – so Earth could attract some debris and create its moon
II. The Lunar Magma Ocean (LMO) Origin– is Venus – because the moon is created by 3 planets debris (Venus – Earth – Mars) – So their rocks are found in it
III. Why The Iron Oxide (Feo) of the Moon= (13%)? Because The rate (13%) is a middle between Mars rate (18%) and the terrestrial mantle (8%).
IV. Why Mars diameter (and Mass) are decreased through the history? Because of the collisions – Mars diameter lost around (5%) (and Mars mass also which causes difficulties for Mars gravitation equation)
V.
VI. The Greatest Earthquake is occurred because of Mars & Earth Collision – But – Why Mars was immigrated? Because of The Sun Creation Process – Can such Earthquake be occurred again? It depends On The Sun Life Cycle
(A Conclusion: Giant-impact hypothesis supports Mars Immigration Theory)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar System Motion Analysis (Revised And Modified).pdfGerges francis
The Solar System Motion Analysis (Revised And Modified)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis no. (1)
- The Solar System Be Created Based On One Geometrical Design
Paper hypothesis no. (2)
- The Solar Planets And Their Distances Be Created Out Of One Light Beam
Paper hypothesis no. (3)
- This Light Beam Travels With A Velocity 1.16 Million Km Per Second
Paper hypotheses Explanation
- Hypothesis no. (1)
- The hypothesis tells, the solar system be created based on one geometrical design, means, the planets dimensions and data be defined by one equation and can be concluded based on one another – this fact the paper proves clearly –
- The paper provides 4 equations which can be considered as a discovery, by them we can conclude the planets fact sheet theoretically without observation, let's prove that by introducing the first equation of them
- d2= 4d0 (d- d0) where (d =planet orbital distance) and (d0 = previous planet orb. dis.)
- The equation tells, the distance from the sun to Pluto be distributed geometrically in order regardless the planets data – neither their masses nor their diameters – simply the distance be distributed geometrically regardless planets data –
- (The paper tests and proves the equation) - let's provide the 2nd equation
- (d1/d2) = (v2/v1)2 where (d = planet orbital distance) and (v= planet velocity),
- The equation doesn't use the planets order as the first one –
- The 4 equations tells one clear information which is
- If we know (Mercury orbital distance =57.9 mkm), By use these 4 equations, we can conclude theoretically all planets orbital distances, periods, velocities, their diameters, rotation periods, masses, orbital inclinations and axial tilts. This data we conclude theoretically without observation by these 4 equations
- The next question should be Why? hypothesis no. (2) answers -Because,
- The Solar Planets And Their Distances Be Created Out Of One Light Beam.
- This is similar to Young Experiment (the double slits experiment), the sun rays produces bright fringes and dark fringes (One Design) (If we accept that, we have to suppose the bright fringes be seen by us as matters and the dark as space)
- The paper proves this fact also, by analysis of Lorentz length contraction effect and tries to answer the question (Why does Particle length be contracted by its high velocity motion?)
- But, the complexity isn't finished
- The light beam based on which the solar planets and their distances be created, this light beam travels with a velocity 1.16 million km per second!!
- And how to prove this fact? and from where we know this number 1.16 mkm/s?? (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
Paper Question
-How The Earth Moon Is Created?
-The Giant –Impact Hypothesis provides a good description about How the Earth Moon was Created…
-I have suggested Mars Migration Theory which can solve many difficulties faces The Giant- Impact Theory and provides a very good answer for the question how the Moon was created?
-Mars Migration Theory is reviewed in this paper introduction
Now
-Mars Migration Theory tells that – the Earth Moon was created by Mars Collisions With Venus & Earth and from these Collisions debris the Earth Moon was created in addition to Mars moons and the Asteroid belt
But
-If the Earth Moon is created from the collisions debris – why the moon diameter is created based on geometrical rules?! How to do that?
Let's consider this question in more details… for example
-The earth Moon diameter x the sun diameter = Jupiter orbital circumference – Why? this data is one of similar hundreds – for example – the moon diameter x the moon orbital motion distance (from perigee to apogee 43000 km) = Earth orbital distance…!
I want to say… that
-The Earth Moon Diameter was not created by any random process - Some Geometrical Power is found behind and forced the moon to have this (Specific Diameter & Circumference) which will be in harmony with all planets data as we have seen…!
-What's this Geometrical Power? Is it the gravity force? can the gravity produce a complex geometrical effect? What Mass the Earth should have to produce its moon with another diameter? Based on what equation?
Let's to consider this question as deep as possible in this paper
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Is The Earth Moon Diameter Created Based On Geometrical Calculations? Why? (II)Gerges francis
We still try to see our previous discussion depth… let's review its basic points…
-The 1st Question Was … Why The Earth Moon Diameter is created based on geometrical calculations as many data proves that strongly?
-The answer was – because Jupiter Mass defines the Earth Moon Mass, where the moon is created from the collisions debris that means the density was defined before – based on that the moon diameter is defined obligatory
-The 2nd Question Was…Why does Jupiter Mass define the Earth Moon Mass?
-The answer was – Because Jupiter is the inner planets parent i.e. Jupiter defines all inner planets masses and based on that Jupiter defines The Earth Moon Mass
-The 3rd Question Was…Why Jupiter definition for the earth Moon Mass causes geometrical calculations? In more clear words – if Jupiter mass/Earth moon mass = 25920 – why this number (25920) causes geometrical calculations for the moon diameter?!
-The answer–Because the rate 25920 shows that – There's a light accompanying the planet motion – what does that mean?
-The light and planet move together passing the same distance but with different rate of time – the light passes this distance 25920 mkm in 1 solar day but the planets pass the same distance in 1461 solar days – The Geometrical Calculations are necessary here to create the consistency between Planet and light motions –
i.e.
-The distance 25920 mkm is an exemplar for all solar system distances – all distances are passed by light & planet motions creating geometrical rules for the general unified motion consistency – so then we should ask!
(4th Question) Can You Prove That?
(5th Q.) How Can The Geometrical Rules Be Created By Planet And Light Motions?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper Hypothesis
-The Solar system is created by a light beam its velocity =1.16 mkm /sec
-The planets were created before the sun creation – All planets had lives in that time
-The Sun is Created as a result of interactions done between Mercury with Uranus and Neptune in the same time… and by both planets effect Mercury pushed the Sun to be created…!
In More Clear Explanation
-The light before Mercury has velocity =1.16 mkm/sec – and Mercury splits this light beam into 2 parts one of them is the light known velocity 0.3mkm/sec and the rest energy is seen as darkness (Space)!
-By That Mercury Caused To Create The Sun – i.e. Mercury main role in this process is to decrease the light velocity and caused to loss the great part of energy source in the solar system where only The rate (0.3/1.16) of energy still be seen as light beam where the other great part became seen as darkness.
- Because Of The Sun Creation – Mars had migrated from its original orbital distance (84 mkm) to its new one (227.9 mkm) and Pluto also migrated from its original point to the solar system end point
-Also As A Result Of The Sun Creation- the life is no longer available for all planets – but only on Earth because of the great changes the sun creation did – that explains Why Mars has features of ancient life – because all planets had lives in their ancient time before the sun creation but every thing is changed after
The paper tries to answer the following questions
-Why the sun was created?
-Is There a light beam its velocity =1.16 mkm/sec
Let's remember Mars Migration Theory in the paper introduction.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Earth Motion Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass GravityGerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- Earth Be Found Before The Sun Creation
The Hypothesis Explanation
- The hypothesis tells that, The Earth is Older Than The Sun
- The ages question provides an essential modification for the physics basic theories,
- Because,
- If Earth be found and moving before the sun creation, that disproves clearly and decisively Newton Theory of The Sun Mass Gravity.
- As a result, Earth and all other solar planets must move by a force different from the sun mass gravity.
- But, how to prove that, the Earth is older than the sun? The event be found before millions of years!
- Because the sun circles Earth and gives it one face only, that may prove the sun data be created depending on Earth orbital period (365.25 days) which proves that the sun must be created after the Earth creation.
Paper Objective
- The paper analyzes Earth orbital period to know Why The Sun Circles Earth.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Giant-impact hypothesis supports "Mars Immigration Theory" (III)Gerges francis
The Giant-impact hypothesis suggests that, The Earth Moon is formed from the ejects of a collision between the proto-Earth and a Mars-sized planet…etc
I suggest the following theory:
- Mars itself had collided The Earth and not another planet. how that is happened?
- Mars original orbital distance =84 mkm, and Mars had to move from it to its new orbital distance =227.9 mkm – i.e. - Mars had to move from 84 mk to 227.9 mk.
- Through Mars motion – Mars had collided Venus (at first) and Earth (at Second)
- Mars had moved pushing by a strong force from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm and that caused the collisions debris (and ejects) to move with Mars in the same motion –
- Venus has no Moon –because the debris had to move with Mars in the same motion, But because Earth Mass is greater than Venus & Mars and because the debris lost their high motion momentum, Earth could controlled some of these debris and created its moon by them – the rest debris still moved with Mars
- Mars could attract its 2 small moons from these debris
How to prove this story? By 3 following questions:
(1st question) Was Mars Original Orbital Distance = 84 mkm really? how to prove?
(2nd question) Is Mars Motion from (84 mkm) to (227.9 mkm) an unique motion?
(3rd question) What are the results which prove this motion occurrence?
These questions will be discussed– but let's summarize the (3rd question) Answer:
Mars Immigration Results:
1- Mars Diameter Decreasing
2- The Asteroid Belt Creation.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Mars Immigration Theory (Part II) (Questions and Answers) Gerges francis
Abstract
We discuss here many questions concerning "Mars Immigration Theory"
Let's write the questions in the following order:
(Question No. 1)
How To Prove That Mars Original Orbital Distance Was 84 Mkm And Mars Had Immigrated To Its New Orbital Distance Point 227.9 Mkm
(Question No. 2)
If Mars Diameter Is Changed Through The History, How Can To Prove That?
(Question No. 3)
Why Mars had immigrated from its original point (84 mkm)? And Why specifically to the point 227.9 mkm? Why not to 200 mkm or 250 mkm?
Please Note
Mars Immigration Theory Is Supported By The Giant –Impact Hypothesis
Where This Hypothesis provides Many Geological Proves For Mars Immigration
And
Mars Immigration Theory solves many important questions to improve the Giant-Impact Hypothesis…
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Mars Migration Theory Supports The Conclusion That "Saturn Must Be Created After The Earth Moon Creation"
Mars Migration Theory Revision:
- Mars original orbital distance was 84 mkm. and Mars had migrated to 227.9 mkm
- Through Mars Motion from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm, Mars had collided with Venus and then Mars had collided with Earth also.
- From the Collisions debris The Earth Moon was created –and Mars had found its moons. And the rest debris had attracted by Jupiter and created The Asteroid Belt
The Giant-Impact Hypothesis is in consistency with Mars migration theory
But Instead of the (Supposed Planet) Theia, Mars itself made the collisions.
Mars migration Theory solves The Giant-Impact Hypothesis difficulties:
I. Why Venus has No Moon? – Because Mars had migrated and moved from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm and pushed all debris in its motion direction – far from Venus – So Venus had found no debris around to create its own Moon - But Earth has a greater Mass and the debris lost their motion high momentum at Earth Position– so Earth could attract some debris and create its moon
II. The Lunar Magma Ocean (LMO) Origin– is Venus – because the moon is created by 3 planets debris (Venus – Earth – Mars) – So their rocks are found in it
III. Why The Iron Oxide (Feo) of the Moon= (13%)? Because The rate (13%) is a middle between Mars rate (18%) and the terrestrial mantle (8%).
IV. Why Mars diameter (and Mass) are decreased through the history? Because of the collisions – Mars diameter lost around ( 4.1 %) (And Mars mass also which causes difficulties for Mars gravitation equation)
V. Mars migration is done Because of The Sun Creation Process
VI. Is there a possibility that Mars will return to its original point (84 mkm)? Yes
VII. Why? Because the Planet orbital distance is defined relative to its diameter (and Mass) Mars now is in the wrong Position- but forced to it because of the sun effect
Conclusion The Giant-impact hypothesis supports Mars migration Theory
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Can Jupiter motion effect on the Earth moon motion?
The answer usually is (NO) because of the great distance which weaken the gravity force of Jupiter to effect on the Earth moon motion
The question – in fact – tries to reach to the classical mechanics puzzle depth – where the mechanics theory provides us just the gravity force as a reason for particle motion where this gravity force depends on points of masses in the space – by this description – the mechanics provides one choice only depends on separated points in the space removing any feature of the Integrating Geometrical Cooperation
Based on that –
The solar system is consisted of separated planets found independently from each other and these planets revolve around the sun by the masses gravity forces
The solar system planets data provides another vision – where there's a clear dependency between the planets data – which supports the integrating geometrical cooperation and contradicting the mechanics theory –
The situation becomes more clear now – it's not related to some similar data between 2 planets or some pure coincidence of 2 planets motions – it deals with the concept behind – where 2 different visions fight each other fiercely – one vision tells that we deal with separated points in the space and the other tells that we deal with a geometrical building uses the planets matters and distances to create one geometrical building – because of that – the planets data are created depending on each other –
Now – we may ask again –
Why We See The Sun Disc = The Moon Disc? Because
(The Sun diameter/ the moon diameter) =(Earth orbital distance/ Earth moon distance)
The geometrical force which created the solar system used planets diameters and distances to create A Geometrical Situation- the answer (Coincidence) is incorrect – but the wrong answer is originated from a wrong concept –
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Can Titius Bode law disprove Mars Immigration TheoryGerges francis
This paper tries to answer 2 basic questions which are:
(1st Question) –If it's real that, Mars had immigrated from its original orbital distance (84 mkm) to its new current one (227.9mkm)- So Why Mars had immigrated?
(2nd Question)–If Mars Immigration is a fact– Why Titius –Bode Law expresses Mars (current) orbital distance (227.9 mkm) normally without disturbances?
Let's remember "Mars Immigration Theory" in following:
- Mars original orbital distance was 84 mkm. and Mars had immigrated from it to its current orbital distance 227.9 mkm
- Through Mats Motion from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm, Mars had collided with Venus and then Mars had collided with Earth also.
- From the Collisions debris Earth Moon was created –and Mars had found its moons. And the rest debris was attracted by Jupiter and created The Asteroid Belt
The Giant-impact hypothesis is in consistency with Mars immigration theory
But
- Instead of the (Supposed Planet) Theia, Mars itself made the collisions- and caused the Earth –Moon Creation -
Mars Immigration Theory solves The difficulties of Giant-impact hypothesis:
I. Why Venus Has No Moon? – Because Mars moved from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm and pushed all debris in its motion direction – far from Venus – but Earth has greater Mass and the debris lost their motion high momentum – so Earth could attract some debris and create its moon
II. The Lunar Magma Ocean (LMO) Origin– is Venus – because the moon is created by 3 planets debris (Venus – Earth – Mars) – So their rocks are found in it
III. Why The Iron Oxide (Feo) of the Moon= (13%)? Because The rate (13%) is a middle between Mars rate (18%) and the terrestrial mantle (8%).
IV. Why Mars diameter is decreased through the history? Because of the collisions – Mars diameter lost around (5%) (and Mars mass also which causes difficulties for Mars gravitation equation)
Shortly: the Giant-impact hypothesis supports Mars Immigration Theory
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Does Planet Day Period Depend On Its Circumference (IV)Gerges francis
Paper Questions:
- (1) Does the planet Day Period Depend On Its Circumference?!
- (2) Why Jupiter Motion depends on the Earth moon circumference? i.e.
o (1st Point) What's Jupiter effect on the Earth moon motion?
o (2nd side) has the Earth moon similar effect on other planets?
- Saturn moves during its day period a distance = its circumference, and Jupiter does this same job with error (4%) only… because of these 2 planets I have suggested the rule (Planet Day Period is defined by motion distance = Planet circumference)
- No other planets follow the rule, so no credibility to be used as a general rule
- But
- Before to give up, we have to analyze the source point from which this rule is created, which was the Earth moon effect on Jupiter motion!
- Where
- The moon (10921km) needs to rotate around its axis 13.1 times to move a distance = 142984 km = Jupiter diameter – on the other side – Jupiter velocity =13.1 km/sec, by this velocity Jupiter itself needs to move 10921 seconds to pass a distance=its diameter
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Does Mars effect on The Earth Moon Motion?Gerges francis
This paper discusses 3 basic points which are:
(1st Point) Mars Immigration Theory which explain the Earth Moon Origin
(2nd Point) Mars & Earth Moon Motions Interaction – where I claim that – both Motions depend on each other regardless the distance
(3rd Point) a deep analysis for the force causes the plant motion – because I claim that- the planet moves by a force more stronger and effective geometrically than th gravity definition as written in the modern physics book
Let's remember "Mars Immigration Theory" to pass the point No. 1
- Mars original orbital distance was 84 mkm and Mars had immigrated from it to its new orbital distance 227.9 mkm – Through this Motion from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm Mars had collided with Venus and then Mars had collided with Earth also
- From these Collisions debris Earth Moon is created –also from the debris Mars had found its moons and the rest debris were attracted by Jupiter, creating The Asteroid Belt –
- Mars Immgration Theory simply supports "The Giant-impact hypothesis" but there's no another planet caused the collisions – instead Mars itself did by its motion from its orginal point 84 mkm to its current one 227.9 mkm
"Mars Immigration Theory" solves The Giant –Impact Hypothesis difficulties
- The Lunar Magma Ocean (LMO) Origin– is Venus – because the moon is created by 3 planets debris – that's why the three planets rock are found…
- Why Venus Has No Moon? – Because Mars moved from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm and pushed all debris with its motion direction – far from Venus – but Earth has greater Mass and the debris lost their motion high momentum – so Earth could attrackt some debris and create its moon
- Why The Iron Oxide (Feo) of the Moon= (13%)? This also is solved because The rate (13%) is a middle between Mars rate (18%) and the terrestrial mantle (8%).
i.e.
The Giant-impact hypothesis supports Mars Immigration Theory
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar System Creation And Motion (Question And Answers) (Part 2).pdfGerges francis
The Solar System Creation And Motion (Question And Answers) (Part 2)
Abstract
Question No. 1
Why Is The Big Bang Theory A Wrong One?
Question No. 2
Why Is Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity A Wrong One?
Question No. 3
Why Isn't The Time A Vector?
Question No. 4
Do we know (How The Solar System Be Created)?
Question No. 5
How Be The Matter Created?
Question No. 6
Can Lorentz Transformations Help To Discover The Matter Origin?
Question No. 7
Can The Solar Planets Move A Unified Motion As A Machine Of Gears? What's The Result Of This Motion?
Question No. 8
From What Energy The Solar System Be Created?
Question No. 9
Can The Solar System Be Created Of Energy Provided By One Light Beam?
Question No. 10
Can A light beam its velocity 1160000 km/sec be found?
Question No. 11
Can Be A Planned Design Found Before The Solar System Creation?
Question No. 12
Let's Suppose A Planned Design Be Found Before The Solar System Creation, But - How Can This A Planned Design Be Found Before The Solar System Creation?
Question No. 13
Is There A Parallel Universe?
Question No. 14
Why Be All Motions In The Universe In Circular Forms?
Question No. 15
I Claim The Solar System Be Created Based On One Geometrical Design -But - What's The Useful Result Of The Solar System One Geometrical Design?
Question No. 16
Can One Geometrical Design Be Found Behind The Solar System Creation?
Question No. 17
How to prove A Hypothesis "A Light Beam Its Velocity 1.16 Million Km /Sec Be Found In The Solar System"
Question No. 18
Do We Understand The Solar System Motion?
Question No. 19
How be planet data created? (Why Does The Moon Diameter Equal 3475 Km?)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
The Solar System Motion Analysis (Questions For Discussions)Gerges francis
Paper objective
- The paper provides (100) questions without their answers (for discussions) concerning the solar system motion analysis.
- The questions aim to modify the solar system classical description and replace it with a new vision. Whose summary is in following:
- The solar system classical description tells, the solar planets are separated rigid bodies independent from each other in their motions, revolving around the sun by masses gravity forces.
- The new vision tells that,
o The solar group is a machine of gears and each planet is a gear in it. the solar group is one creature body and each planet is a member in it. or it's one building and each planet is a part of this same building.
o The solar group is crated based on one geometrical design.
o The planets data is created complementary one another, because of that, there's one equation only controls all solar planets data.
o The complementary meaning can be understood from the double production experiment. While n electron and a positron be created from Gamma ray, the electron and positron charges are crated complementary with each because of the charge reservation law, and the 2 particles move depend on their charges.
o Based on this vision,
o The solar planets motions be cooperated together and create one complementary unified motion. by that, the solar planets move one unified motion similar to the train carriages motion.
o The unified motion necessitates to transport the motion among the solar planets.
o Because the (1 second a period of time) be defined as a function in a planet motion features, so this period (1 second) is different from a planet to another, but the unification of planets motions in one unified motion causes to create one unified rate of time used by the unified motion.
- The questions are provided with different data to support the suggested new vision.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
Mars ancient orbital distance was 84 mkm and changed to be 227.9 mkm later.
The hypothesis explanation
- Mars was the next planet after Mercury with orbital distance =84 mkm and Mars had migrated into Mars current orbital distance (227.9 mkm)
- Through Mars Displacement from (84 mkm) to (227.9 mkm), Mars had collided with Venus and then with Earth and then reach to its current orbital distance point
- By these collisions debris the Earth could create its own moon and also Mars moons are created in addition to the asteroid belt.
- Means, Mars itself caused the Earth moon creation by its Migration in place of the Planet (Theia) supposed by the Giant-impact hypothesis.
- Mars Migration theory answers the Giant-impact hypothesis questions, are:
- What's The Lunar Magma Ocean (LMO) Origin?– It's Venus
- Why Venus couldn't create its own moon from the collisions debris? Because Mars had moved from (84 mkm) to (227.9 mkm), So Mars had pushed all debris in its motion direction because of that Venus found no debris around it to create its own moon, But Earth gravity is grater than Venus' and the debris lost some of their motion momentum, because of that Earth could create its own moon.
Mr. Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Solar System Be Built On One Geometrical Design (Revised).pdfGerges francis
The Solar System Be Built On One Geometrical Design (Revised)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Solar System Be Built On One Geometrical Design
(As a result the planets data can be concluded theoretically without observation)
The hypothesis proves
Equation No. (1)
d2 = 4d0 (d-d0)
d = the planet orbital distance
d0 = The direct previous neighbor planet orbital distance
(Earth depends on Mercury – Mars depends on Venus – Pluto depends on Uranus )
Equation No. (2)
(d1/d2) = (v2¬/v1)2
d1= Planet Orbital Distance (its velocity v1)
d2= Another Planet Orbital Distance (Not Neighbor) (its velocity v2)
Equation No. (3)
(v1/ v2) = s/r
r = Planet Diameter
s = The Planet Rotation Periods Number In Its Orbital Period
The Proves Explanation
- Let's summarize the idea in following
- By Equation no. (1) we can conclude all planets orbital distances by using Mercury orbital distance (57.9 mkm) – if we know this data only – we can conclude by Equation no. (1) all planets orbital distances – means planet orbital distance depends n its neighbor orbital distance
- Equation no. (2) gives a extension for our knowledge – because – by Equation no. (2) we can conclude all planets velocities rates – that can help to define the planets orbital periods –
- We notice that, Equation no. (1) depends on planets order – but equation no. (2) doesn't depend on the planets order.
- Equation no. (3) can define planets diameters and rotation periods based on their velocities rate.
- Why do we need these equations?
- If we know (Mercury orbital distance =57.9 mkm) we can conclude theoretically (1) All Planets Orbital Distances (2) All Planets Velocities Rates and their orbital periods and (3) All Planets Diameters And Rotation Periods
- Why do we need that?
- Because the solar group data proves another vision for it – the planets aren't rigid bodies separated from one another – on the contrary- the planets be similar to parts in one geometrical design or members in one creature body – in more accurate – the planets be similar to stories in one building - they are created based on one another – as you see a child and discovers that its face is similar to its parent – or its eyes are similar to its mother – the persons are separated from one another but the data shows that they are created based on each other –when you look at them and decide they are separated persons – that means you are wrong – Newton is Mistaken –
- Based on this vision, the solar system motion must depend on One Geometrical Design,
- means
- The solar planets move one unified motion as train carriages move together. Or similar to ships sail over a sea move by this sea waves
- Also the solar group can be similar to 9 waterwheels be built on one canal and this canal water causes to rotate the 9 waterwheels. (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Is a Phenomenon, Created By The Planets Motions Energies (revised).pdfGerges francis
Paper hypothesis
The solar planets distribution between the sun and Pluto depends on one design – this design uses the distance 90000 million km as a distance unit.
The hypothesis explanation
The hypothesis tells – the planets distribution uses one design and this one design gives a chance for the planets to make their distances total equal 90000 million km for a unit period of time – there's a necessity to use this distance we explain here.
The data shows 2 facts
(1st Fact) One Map (One Design) Controls The Planets Distribution Between The Sun And Pluto –
(2nd Fact) This One Design Uses The Distance 90000 Million Km As A Unit
Paper first question
Why does the solar system design use the distance 90000 million km as a unit?
Let's answer in following…
If (c =300000 km/sec = light velocity) how can we measure the value (c2)?
Let's suppose we use the value (c2) for one second – how can we measure it?
In this case the value (c2) will be = 90000 million km
Now
The hypothesis tells, the planets motions aim to pass this distance (90000 million km) and to use this distance based on A Motion For A Period Of Time = One Second
(We Discover In The Paper Discussion How This Motion Can Be Created)
As a result –
The distance 90000 million km will be a equivalent to the value (c2)
And
The value (c2) is the source of energy from which the sun rays be created.
Based on that
The Sun Rays Be Created By The Planets Motions Energies Total
Means,
The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion - Instead – the planets motions energies total be accumulated and be used as energy source to produce the sun rays- then the sun disc and body be created from the sun rays energy.
And
Because the planets motions aim to create the sun rays they aim to pass the required distance 90000 million km and the solar system design causes this distance to be used by a motion depends on one second
Paper second question
Can Light Beam Be Produced By Matters Relative Motion?
The planets motions distances total per solar day (=17.75 million km)
(This distance contains the Earth moon velocity which is equal Earth velocity)
During 1461 days the planets motions distances total be =25920 million km
Light (300000 km/s) travels in one day (86400 s) a distance =25920 million km
But the Earth Cycle is (365 +365+365+366 =1461 days)
The idea tells us – if 1461 seconds of the Earth motion = 1 second of the sun motion – the velocities difference between the 2 motions will be= Light Velocity (300000km/s)
The paper discusses how that can be possible- but – here – we discuss the conceptual question- can light beam be created by matters relative motion?
The planets data tells about a new method which is (Motions Use Different Rate Of Time) (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
2012 Phenomenon Has Told Facts Because (The Sun Is A Phenomenon).pdfGerges francis
Best greetings –
2012 Phenomenon has told Facts Because (The Sun Is A Phenomenon)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The sun is a phenomenon created by the planets motions – means - the sun is not doing nuclear fusion to create its rays but the sun rays be created by Planets Motions Energies total- As a result – the sun is created after all planets creation and motion which disproves Newton theory of the sun gravity where no planet moves by the sun gravity –
The hypothesis explanation
The sun creation as a phenomenon depends on the planets motions energies shows a great gab between the solar system motion description and the real facts of this motion –for that reason – I provide 2 more points to confirm this gab existence while the 2 points be less strange in meaning can prove clearly this gab is found deeply in the description– not only for the sun rays source of energy but also for the basic ideas of the solar system motion.
(Point No. I)
The Mass Gravity Force Can't Cause The Solar System Motion
The planet moves by the force which caused its creation otherwise this planet will be broken by its motion because 2 forces affect on it- Newton Is Wrong In Logic – But –
I wish to move beyond this point –because – I refuse generally the mass gravity force using as a reason for the solar system motion – the idea is wrong in concept –
Basically because
The mass gravity force is so limited force in range and can't provide the solar system motion features – we need one more powerful and intelligent force – the eclipse phenomenon may help this explanation –the force which created the planets diameters in proportionality with specific distances – and the sun diameter be used also in this process- the force considers each planet motion and velocity – thinking about the whole process to produce the total solar eclipse by many players their creation data be created for this purpose.
Usually the total solar eclipse be considered as pure coincidence result and the beauty of geometry be removed- the paper analyzes the eclipse geometrical data to show a small part of the beauty –
Can the mass gravity poor concept do that? the description Newton told can explain how the matter be created? or how is planet data created? why is the moon diameter =3475 km? because if it be 5000 km the whole geometry will be changed….
The moon creation can help to see another part of this force beauty – the moon be created by planets collision but the moon diameter be created based one exact equations – means- the force works geometrically even through the collisions
In fact
This idea also shows the gab between the solar system facts and the current theory because – while – the current description supposes the planets data be created by random process, initial conditions and unknown historical factors that fact is that the planets data be created based on exact equations
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Rays Production Theory
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Sun Rays Energy Source Is The Planets Motions Energy – means- The Sun Is Not doing nuclear fusion to create its rays – instead – the planets motions energies total be used to create the sun rays.
The hypothesis explanation
I- The Sun Rays Creation Depend On The Relative Motion Concept
This point provides the method by which the sun rays be created – the rays creation depend on the relative motion – that means- we need to find 2 motions in the solar system move relative one another and the different velocity between the 2 motions be = Light Velocity = 300000 km/sec
Regardless – this is possible or not – our job be defined clearly –
We need 2 motions move relative one another and the different velocity between these 2 motions be = Light Velocity = 300000 km/sec
II- Can We Attribute Mechanical Features For The Space?
Here we try to produce the 2 relative motions –
(Let's suppose the sun isn't found but the planets still revolve around its space point)
We have to attribute mechanical features for the space – let's do that in following
We suppose the space be similar to a sea water and the planet be similar to a stick moves perpendicularly through the sea water – this is similar to – a spoon turns water in a vessel - the spoon motion through the water causes a wave in the water –
The theory supposes the planet motion causes a wave in the space –
let's use this hypothesis in our analysis…
Mercury revolves around the sun (point) with velocity 47.4 km/sec – how to see that in our description?
Mercury (a stick moves through water perpendicularly) revolves around the sun point and causes to create a wave by its motion – Mercury velocity is 47.4 km/sec and that causes the wave velocity to be (47.4 km/sec)
And -
Venus (a stick moves through water perpendicularly) revolves around the sun point and causes to create a wave by its motion – Venus velocity (35 km/s) – by that the wave velocity be (47.4 km/sec +35 km/sec = 82.4 km/sec)
And – The Earth moon (a stick moves through water perpendicularly) revolves around the sun point and causes to create a wave by its motion –the moon velocity (29.8 km/s) – by that the wave velocity be (47.4 km/sec +35 km/sec +29.8 = 112.2 km/sec) (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
Paper hypothesis
The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion
Saturn motion causes to produce the sun rays
means, Saturn moves by light velocity relative to the sun point –
The hypothesis Proof
The paper hypothesis tells Saturn motion causes to produce the sun rays
Let's prove that in following
(1)
The Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time Where
One hour of Mercury motion be = 24 hours of any planet motion (except Saturn)
One hour of Any Planet motion be = 24 hours of Saturn
These rates of time be proved in the paper discussion.
(2)
Saturn moves a distance =90000 million km in a period = 107470 days
The period 107470 days (of Saturn) = 576 x 186.6 days (Of Mercury)
Means this period (107470 days) be seen on Mercury as (186.6 days)
(3)
The 9 planets velocities total be =176 km/sec –
This total be created relative to the point of space on which the sun will be created –
Means
We suppose the sun isn't found and the planets still revolve around the point of space on which the sun will be created-
Mercury (47.4 km/s) revolves around this point of space and creates a different in velocity with it = (47.4km/s)
Venus (35 km/s) revolves around this point and creates a different in velocity = 47.4km/s + 35km/s =82.4 km/s
The 9 planets velocities total 176 km/s causes to create a different velocity =176 km/s with this point of space
Now
The rate of time be created based on the rate of velocities –means
1day of this point of Space be =176 days of Mercury
(Mercury controls this velocities total 176 km/s)
But
107470 days (of Saturn) be =186.6 days (of Mercury) = 1.0725 days of the point of space
We know the rate (1.0725) effect on the solar system – for example – this rate effect on 40% of all distances and 60% 0f all planets axial tilts and effect on many other data-
By this rate (1.0725) the period (1.0725 days) will be = one day
Means
107470 days (of Saturn) be =186.6 days (of Mercury) = one day of the point of space
But
The solar system creation theory tells– the planets matters and their distances be created from one energy and this energy be provided by one light beam and the planets move with this light beam based on the rate of time (One Second of Light motion be = One Solar day of Planet Motion)
This must be the same rate be used with the space because the matter and space be created together.
As a result
107470 days (of Saturn) be =186.6 days (of Mercury) = one day of the point of space =one second of light motion
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
Paper hypothesis
(1)
The Sun Rays Be Produced By Planets Velocities Total - The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion
Light (300000 km/sec) travels in one solar day a distance = the solar planets motions distances total in 1461 solar days–
The solar planets velocities total uses this rate of time (1=1461) and produces light velocity (300000 km/sec) from the planets velocities total
(2)
If the solar planets motions can't produce light velocity the solar system would be destroyed.
Paper conclusion
Because the sun rays energy be provided by the planets motions energies total and the planets move in cycles – that necessitates – the sun creation and death depend on a cycle –means- after this sun be dead another sun will be created because the sun is a phenomenon created based on a cycle (as the eclipse)
The hypothesis explanation
(1)
The Planets Matters And Their Distances Be Created Out Of One Energy -
This idea can be acceptable simply by the physics book because it's known that the matter and space be created of energies – here – I add one idea only tells that-from the same one energy the planets matters and their distances be created –
The matter and space have different forms spite they be created from the same energy because the creation rules be different for them- as the oil and coal - they be created from the same source but the creation rules be different and the forms be different as a result
The idea causes basic change in the solar system motion description–because –instead of the separated planets as separated points – we deal with one energy which causes to create a continuum of data – by that –the data can be transported among the planets (in fact it does).
The idea doesn't create any new thing– but – it discovers the unjustifiable description for the planets motions – where it be believed that the planets are separated from one another as islands in a sea and no connection can be available – this description is mistaken in concept because the matter is created of energy and the space is created of energy and it's illogical to prevent the contact between them -here – the transportation of data among the planets should be a proved fact depend on the planets motions.
Shortly
The continuum of data of the solar system is a logical fact should be proved, and the separated points description should be considered unjustifiable vision.
A Conclusion
From one energy the planets matters and their distances be created
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Is A Phenomenon
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The solar planets velocities total be equivalent to light velocity 300000 km/s
The hypothesis explanation
- The Sun Is A Phenomenon Created By The Planets Motions –
- Means-
- The Sun Rays Energy Source Isn't Any Nuclear Interaction Found Inside The Sun – But – The Sun Rays Energy Be Found By The Planets Motions Energies Total
- Shortly
- The Planets Velocities Total Be Used As One Motion Velocity – And This Motion Uses A Rate Of Time To Reach To Light Velocity.
- Let's explain that in details in following…
- (1)
- We need to suppose that (One Hour Of Mercury Motion =24 Hours Of Any Planet Motion) and
- (One Hour Of Mercury Motion = 24 Solar Days Of Saturn Motion)
- These rates of time be proved in the discussion clearly –
- (2)
- The 9 planets velocities total be =176 km/sec – this value be seen in Mercury Data as (176 solar days = Mercury Day Period)
- We conclude that, Mercury controls this velocities total 176 km/s
- And
- After The Earth Moon Creation, the moon velocity 29.8 km/sec be added to the 9 planets velocities total (176 +29.8 =205.8 km/s)
- The total 205.8 km/s be seen in the moon motion data as (205.8 x π =655.7) (error 1.4%) where (655.7 hours = the moon rotation period)
- That tells the velocities total be seen also in the moon rotation period (a cycle period as Mercury)
- But
- Why for Mercury used (DAYS) but for the moon used (HOURS)??
- Because
- (One Hour Of Mercury Motion = 24 Hours Of The Moon Motion)
- (3)
- The total (205.8 km/s) can create the velocity 300000 km/s only if the rate of time (1=1461) be created – let's see the light velocity creation -
- 300000 km = 205.8s x 9.7 km/s x 24 x 2π
- Let's explain how the light velocity (300000 km/s) be created.
- The planets velocities total (205.8km/s) moves for 1second and passes 205.8 km, this distance be sent from the moon to Saturn in a period form (205.8 seconds)
- But (one hour of any planet motion = 24 hours of Saturn motion) for that reason the period (205.8 s of the moon motion) be equal = (205.8 s x 24) of Saturn motion.
- The rate (2π) be found by the geometrical design
- The data tells, each second Saturn moves, passes a distance =9.7 km but the solar system passes a distance =300000 km
- If the solar system moves (one motion) and uses (one velocity) for this distance (300000 km) for each second - The Solar System Velocity Should Be Equivalent To Light Velocity (300000 km/s) – means – The Planets Velocities Total Should Be Equivalent To Light Velocity (300000 km/s) (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
National Bank Of Egypt Practice The Fraud (2020-2022).pdfGerges francis
Please help (1-9-2022)
National Bank Of Egypt Practice The Fraud (2020-2022)
National bank of Egypt practice Fraud and Breach of Trust
Because
It refused the judgment issued by The French ministry of Justice and denies the money by judged and disregarded the Foreign Court Judgment.
Sent to the honorable united Nations Secretary – General
António Guterres
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Passport No./ A11263731 ID. No./27410090102716
best Greetings
The Sun Creation Process
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
From One Light Beam Energy The Solar System Be Created
And
This Light Beam travels with 1.16 million km per second
The hypothesis explanation..
- (1)
- The solar system be created out of one light beam energy –
- The solar planets matters and their distances be created of one energy and this one energy be provided by one light beam and this light beam travels with velocity 1160000 km/s –
- Shortly
- The physics book accepts that (matter and space be created of energies)
- The hypothesis adds one idea only tells
- (from the same one energy the solar planets matters and their distances be created) this is the hypothesis main idea –
- Matter and Space creation be done from the same stuff (energy) but by using different geometrical rules –the idea is similar to the creation of the oil and coal both be created from the same source but they have 2 different forms because the creation process depend on 2 different geometrical rules.
- The matter and space creation process can be summarized by the following data
- (light 1.16 million/s = matter + space + light 300000 km/s)
- The data tells the input energy be a light beam its velocity 1160000 km/s, from this energy the matter and space be created and the light known velocity 300000 km/s be created as a side product from the process.
- Briefly
- If we find Matters in the universe – we can't find the light velocity 1160000 km/s because its energy be consumed in the matter and space creation process and produced the known light beam velocity 300000 km/s as a side product.
- Based on this vision
- The matter be a geometrical point found on a trajectory of energy or (on a light beam) – by that – the matter moves by light motion –
- Imagine a rock in a tube form be found in some sea water and the water passes through this rock tube and pushes the rock itself to move with the water-
- That answers the question (how does planet move?) no sun gravity be used here – instead – the planet moves by light motion from its energy the planet be created.
- Here we disprove Newton theory of the sun gravity – because
- By one force the planet be created and moving otherwise this planet will be broken by effect of 2 forces on it – here – the force caused the planet creation is the light beam energy and the force causes the planet motion is this same light beam motion- that explains the safe planet motion.
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
Paper hypothesis
Venus motion effect on the moon motion and causes the moon orbital period to be = the moon rotation period =27.3 days
The hypothesis explanation..
- The hypothesis explanation can be summarized in 3 questions:
- (1) Can Planet Data Depend On Exaction Equations?
- (2) By What Equation Planet Diameter Can Be Defined?
- (3) How Can Planet Diameter Equation Change The Solar System Vision?
- Let's try to answer these questions in following…
(1st Question)
Can Planet Data Depend On Exaction Equations?
- (1)
- Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations –
- As a plane or rocket manufacture – the manufacturer needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight and all specifications, otherwise this plane can't fly safely.
- The moving planet under the physical laws has to define its diameter, mass, orbital distance, period, inclination, rotation period, axial tilt …and all data based on Exact Equations otherwise this planet can't move safely.
- I have discovered 5 equations can conclude Planets Data theoretically without observation which prove this fact decisively.
- Then we have to ask (How Planet Data Be Created In Order?)
- (2)
- Planet orbital distance be defined before this planet creation - because – the planets motions leave an empty place for the new planet – by that- each planet orbital distance be defined by the other planets orbital distances and motions trajectories.
- My first equation proves this fact – because – it proves each planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor planet orbital distance –
- d2=4d0 (d-d0) where d= planet orbital distance and d0= its neighbor orbital distance
- Example (Venus orbital distance)2= 4 (Mercury orbital distance) x50.3 million km (Venus orbital distance=108.2 million km Mercury orbital distance =57.9 million km)
- This equation be tested and discussed in this paper – but its concept is a clear one – it tells the planets leave an empty space for the new planet – for that reason each planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor planet orbital distance.
- Logically the new planet can't disturb the current planets positions or motions trajectories – by that –the orbital distance be defined by the neighbors positions –
- (3)
- The new planet has to revolve around the sun based on its orbital distance which be defined obligatorily where no data of this planet be taken into consideration in its orbital distance definition –neither mass nor diameter – instead – the distance be defined based on the neighbor distance.
- But
- Planet diameter should be a function in its orbital distance – otherwise – this planet will be broken through its motion –
- The function between planet diameter and its orbital distance is the necessary requirement to cause the planet safe motion
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Vodafone-Egypt Practices a fraud and breach of trust during 2013-2022.pdfGerges francis
Vodafone –Egypt practices a fraud and breach of trust during (2013-2022)
Vodafone –Egypt practices a fraud and breach of trust during (2013-2022)
2013-2022: Egypt authority prevented any job from me and prevented me to travel abroad- They Torture My Mother By Electric Shock And Try To Kill Her By Insulin Injection- they threaten our lives –Please Help
2010-2013: I have studied in Faculty of physics & Math– Physics Department – Peoples Friendship University of Russia – Moscow – Russian Federation.
2013-2022 (Details) - Because I couldn't return to Moscow - I have performed an interesting research in astrophysics- many international physicists interested for it – while Egypt authority realized my research importance they:
(I) torture my mother by electric shocks to force me stop publishing my papers
(II) They practice hacking on my accounts & Telephone Calls (+201022532292).
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Petition (with signature) (Egypt Persecution Against The Coptic).pdfGerges francis
Please help
Egypt Authority Persecutes The Coptic -Please Help
EGYPT AUTHORITY TRIES TO KILL MY MOTHER – PLEASE HELP
(Also they force my family to send me to the madhouse)
Because
Egypt Authority tries to STEAL my astrophysics research results, I worked in it since 2013 till now –Egypt authority torture us to steal my research – they hanged many of my accounts and even prevent me to write my research papers by using torture.
(They try to burn my laptop- which is my only source for all my research materials)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Passport No./ A11263731 ID. No./27410090102716
Address /11 Mohamed Rageb st- Madenet El Saada – EL Materiya District – Cairo – Egypt
Planet Diameter Be A Function In Its Rotation PeriodGerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- Planet Diameter Be Created As A Function In Its Rotation Period
The hypothesis Explanation
- (1)
- Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations –
- As a plane manufacture – the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight …etc otherwise this plane can't fly safely.
- The moving planet under the physical laws has to define its data based on exact equations otherwise this planet can't move safely.
- I have discovered 5 equations can conclude Planets Data theoretically prove this fact decisively.
- (2)
- Planet orbital distance be defined before this planet creation - because – the planets motions leave an empty place for the new planet – by that- each planet orbital distance be defined by the other planets orbital distances and motions trajectories.
- My first equation proves each planet orbital distance depends on its previous neighbor planet orbital distance –
- d2 = 4d0 (d-d0) where d= planet orbital distance and d0= its neighbor orb. distance
- We test and discuss this equation in the current paper–
- As a result –
- The planet found itself in an obligatory position be defined by other planets data and the planet data itself has no role in its orbital distance definition.
- (3)
- Planet motion can be a dangerous one if this planet diameter isn't in harmony with its orbital distance – means- the wrong diameter can cause the planet to be broken (The mass can decrease planet velocity – but the wrong diameter can break it) – for that reason – the planet has to create its diameter as a function in its orbital distance to move safely.
- But
- If the function has only 2 variables (planet diameter and its orbital distance), If this planet changes its orbital distance for any reason its diameter will be broken as a result –
- The designer had to create the function between planet diameter and its orbital distance as indirect function contains many other variables and by that if the planet changes its orbital distance the other variables will be changed but the diameter will be saved.
- As a result
- Planet diameter be created as a function in its rotation period and the rotation period be a function in its velocity and the velocity be a function in its orbital distance – by that – the function between planet diameter and its orbital distance be created but contains also other variables to protect the diameter.
- My fourth equation proves this fact let's see it
- (4)
- Planet Diameter Definition Equation (My Fourth Equation)
- (v1/v2) = (s/r) =I
- v = Planet Velocity
- r= Planet Diameter
- s= Planet Rotation Periods Number In Its Orbital Period
- I= Planet Orbital Inclination (a rate to inclination unit)
- v2, s, r and I be belonged to one planet and v1 be belonged to another planet
- we test, discuss and analyze this equation in this current paper.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
-Physics and Mathematics Faculty - Peoples' Friendship university of Russia –
Gerges Francis Tawdrous (Curriculum Vitae).pdfGerges francis
Gerges Francis Tawdrous (Curriculum Vitae)
My Research Argument
(Why Should We Refuse Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity?)
1-Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations
Planet diameter, mass, orbital distance, period, inclination, rotation period and axial tilt – All planet data be created based on exact equations and geometrical rules - No single data be created based on random process, initial condition nor unknown historical factors.
As in a plane or a rocket manufacture, the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight and all its specifications and dimensions –
If this plane data be created by inaccurate dimensions, this plane can't fly
Similar to that
Planet moves through the space under physical laws and if its data be not created based on exact equations this planet will be broken through its motion – because – the safe motion necessitates a full harmony between planet data one another and with the physical laws controls the motions through space
In this investigation we try to define how Planet creates its data – or in more accurate words – By What Order Planet Data Be Created? what data be created at first and what be later? – by that – we can discover the harmony original point.
I have discovered 5 equations by which we can conclude planet data theoretically without observation that proves the idea decisively
2- Planet Orbital Distance Be Defined Before Its Creation
This simple fact be proved by 2 basic proves – "First Proof" The Logical Analysis
The current planets positions define the new planet position
The balancing effect of the planets motions forces the new planet to take the left place for it – because the planets revolve around the sun in their trajectories of motions – for that – the new planet has to find a place far from these trajectories.
Imagine you are in some crowded bus – the people pushed you to the last place in this bus because it's the only free place there – you came later and this is the only available place for you – by that – you are forced to accept this place
Planet orbital distance be defined before the planet creation – the logic proves this fact clearly
"Second Proof"
My First Equation tells (d2 = 4d0 (d-d0))
d = Planet Orbital Distance and d0 = its neighbor planet orbital distance
My equation tells– Planet Orbital Distance Depends On Its Neighbor Distance
It's a simple and a trustee equation – let's use Venus as example
(108.2 million km)2 = 4 (57.9 million km) (50.3 million km)
where
108.2 million km = Venus orbital distance and
57.9 million km = Mercury orbital distance and (50.3 = 108.2 -57.9)
(There are 3 exceptions – Earth depends on Mercury – Mars depends on Venus and Pluto depends on Uranus –
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity.pdfGerges francis
Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
Abstract
Paper Argument
- Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
- (1)
- By one force planet be created and moving – means - the force which created the Planet– it causes its motion – as a result
- (No Planet Moves By The Sun Gravity) because (The Sun Had Created No Planet)
- One more force caused the planets creation and their motions
- For that reason
- Planet creation and motion data be in harmony one another –
- For example (Mercury creation and motion data be in harmony one another) and Mercury moves safely and isn't broken
- But -we don't have 9 forces in the solar system – One force for each planet – instead – We have one force only caused All Planets Creation And Motion
- Now- let's ask
- How Can One Force Create 9 Planets And Causes Their Motions?
- This force needs to use One Geometrical Design to do this job – as 9 gears be moving by one motor we need a machine to do this job
- Based on this analysis – No planet moves by the sun gravity – Newton is wrong
- (2)
- The gravitation equation is wrong because no planet orbital distance be defined based on it- and that explains the contradiction between the planets masses order and their orbital distances
- This fact is a powerful against Newton – but the logic still more power
- Because
- The planet orbital distance be defined before this planet creation – because – the distance be defined by other planets distances – means - the new planet orbital distance be defined based on the balancing of the current planets motions trajectories and by that the new planet will find itself in a position defined obligatory by other planets –
- This fact be proved also by my first equation which proves that each planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor planet orbital distance (Not On Its Mass)
- My First Equation tells (d2 = 4d0 (d-d0))
- d = Planet Orbital Distance and d0 = its neighbor planet orbital distance
- (My 5 Equations Be Tested And Discussed In The Paper)
- I want to say
- The principle idea is wrong because the distance be defined obligatory by other planets motions trajectories and planet mass can do nothing to change it
- (3)
- The logic still moves against Newton because
- The planet is found itself in an obligatory position and has to revolve around the sun from this position – now what about this planet diameter – because
- If the planet diameter isn't in harmony with its orbital distance this planet will be broken – here – Newton idea is wrong completely because he looked at the mass but planet mass can decrease its velocity where the wrong diameter can cause the planet to be broken – by that – the planet has to create a function between its orbital distance and its diameter to move safely otherwise it will be broken – the point is Newton defined the mass as the basic player! (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department
,Why Does Planet Orbit Define Its Velocity, (Kepler Law Analysis).pdfGerges francis
Why Does Planet Orbit Define Its Velocity? (Kepler Law Analysis)
Abstract
Paper question
Kepler stated (Planet Orbit Defines Its Velocity) - Why?
What would happen if (Planet Orbit Doesn't Define Its Velocity)?
The answer of this question be summarized in 5 points which are:
(1)
Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations
(2)
Planet Diameter Should Be An Indirect Function In Its Orbital Distance
(3)
Planet Mass Effects On Its Diameter Definition Equation
(4)
The Necessity Of The Function Between Planet Orbit And Its Velocity
(5)
The Refutation Of Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity And The Big Bang Theory.
Let's consider each point in some details in following
(Point No. 1)
Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations
- Planet data (Planet diameter, mass, orbital distance, period, inclination, velocity, rotation period and axial tilt), this data be created based on exact equations and no single data be created by random process, initial condition nor unknown historical factors.
- As in a plane or rocket manufacture, the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight….etc – all data and specifications be defined based on exact equations – similar to that Planet data be created based on exact equations.
- If planet data doesn't depend on exact equations, this planet can't move because the planet is moving through its trajectory and if this motion suffer from no harmony with All planet data – this planet will be broken through its motion – because it moves against its internal structure – we will discuss this idea deeply later.
(continued)
The Solar Eclipse (Questions And Answers).pdfGerges francis
The Solar Eclipse (Questions And Answers)
Abstract
Paper objective
The paper answers the following questions
1. Can each planet orbital distance depend on its neighbor planet orbital distance? In this case how the distance between the sun and Pluto be created? (Can One Map Be Drawn For All Planets Orbital Distances?)
2. Is There a necessity to create a proportionality between planet diameter and orbital distance?
3. Can Planet rotation period be defined based on its velocity?
4. Correct The wrong sentence (Planet Diameter Should Be A Direct Function In Its Orbital Distance And By That This Planet Will Not Be Broken Through Its Motion?)
5. Why Does Venus Have The Longest Rotation Period In The Solar System?
6. Can Planet orbital Distance be Defined before this planet creation? where planet orbital distance be defined based on its neighbor orbital distance?
7. Why Doesn't The Planet Break After Its Creation?
8. Planet data be (Mass – Diameter- Orbital Distance- Period –Inclination….etc) what data be created at first and what be created later?
9. Explain The Relationship Between Planet Diameter And Orbital Distance?
10. Why does the moon orbital period = the moon rotation period (No For Tidal Locking – this idea is wrong)?
11. Can The Planets Velocities Total Be Defined At First And Each Planet Velocity Be A Function In This Total?
12- Can Solar System Depend On One Geometrical Design?
13- Why Does The Moon Orbital Apogee Radius = 406000 km?
14- Can Mars Orbital Distance Be Changed From 84 million km to 228 million km?
15- Did Newton realize The Solar system Motion Logic?
16- How Be The Sun Disc Created?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
The Solar Eclipse Phenomenon Analysis (Revised).pdfGerges francis
The Solar Eclipse Phenomenon Analysis (Revised)
Abstract
Paper Argument
The planets motions can be explained only based on the concept (One Geometrical Design Be found Behind the Solar System)
The Argument explanation
The solar planets are created complementary one another and their motions be integrated into one unified motion – by that- the planets be similar to members of one creature - Their creation data depends on one design and their motions be integrated together into one unified motion (as a machine of gears – many gears motions but the machine produces One Unified Motion)
Because of that
Any planet motion can be explained only through the concept (One Geometrical Design Be found Behind the Solar System), because based on this one design the planets be created and by this one design the planets motions be integrated and produced one unified motion.
Paper objective
- We have proved the one geometrical design before
- In this current paper we examine the one geometrical design details – by that the paper provides rich points of discussion because we discuss the geometrical details of this one design and their effects on the planets creation and motion data.
- The paper discussions points be summarized in following:
- (1)
- The paper proves the one design uses one map for the distance - means
- The solar system design uses the distance from the sun to Pluto as one piece of distance be distributed based on one map –
- (2)
- The paper proves the solar system design uses one more map for the velocities. by that, the design considers the planets motions be integrated into one unified motion as a machine of gears and this (unified velocity) be distributed for the planets velocities based on one more map.
- (3)
- The paper answers the question (why does the design use 2 different maps?) and explains the massive importance for this using
- The paper analyzes also my fourth equation to prove that – planet diameter be created as a function in its rotation period and the rotation period be created a function in its velocity and the velocity be a function in its orbital distance.
- (4)
- The paper disproves the tidal locking claim as a reason for the moon cycles periods equality – the idea is wrong – where – the moon orbital period = the moon rotation period because of the solar system one design effect on the moon motion.
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
The Dancing Planets
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
From One Energy The Solar Planets Matters And Their Distances Be Created
The hypothesis explanation
- (1)
- Newton Theory of the sun gravity is wrong in its logic because by one force the planet should be created and moving –otherwise this planet will be broken -means- The force which created the planet it causes its motion – by that no planet moves by the sun gravity
- (2)
- The Big Bang Theory Is Wrong Because – It Supposed – The First Energy Was In A Chaos Form Resulting From The First Explosion – in Fact – The First Energy (Of The Solar System) was in A Geometrical Design Form.
- (3)
- The physics book accepts (Matter and Space be Created Of Energies) – The paper hypothesis adds one idea tells (From One Energy They Were Created) – means - The planets matters and their distances be created from The Same One Energy
- Let's see the paper basic ideas in following
- (A)
- Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations- As any plane or rocket creation – the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width and All Other Specifications-
- Similar to that,
- Planet mass, diameter, orbital distance, period, velocity, inclination, rotation period and axial tilt – all data be created based on exact equations and no data be created by any random process, initial conditions or historical unknown factors.
- By that, the planets data can be concluded by mathematical calculations only
- My 5 equations prove this fact (The 5 equations be tested in point no. 3)
- (B)
- The Planet data Exact equations depend on One Geometrical Design –means-
- Because the solar system creation and motion depends on One Geometrical Design, the planets data be created based on exact equations
- The One Geometrical Design is the basic argument of the paper –
- It's similar to the electron and positron be created from Gamma ray (The double production experiment), The 2 particles charges total be (Zero) because gamma ray charge is (Zero)
- By that, one law controls the 2 particles motions – and similar to that – one law or One Geometrical Design controls the solar planets creations and motions
- Also, from Planet motion analysis- we can reach to this same conclusion
- We accept that, one force only be used for planet creation and motion, and the force which created the planet causes its motion –otherwise this planet will be broken because 2 forces effect on it- but
- We don't have 9 forces create the 9 solar planets and cause their motions – instead- we have only one force causes all planets creation and motion –
- This one force can do this job only by using One Geometrical Design -
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Planet Diameter Definition Equation
Abstract
Planet Diameter Definition Equation (My Fourth Equation)
(v1/v2) = (s/r) = I
v = Planet Velocity
r= Planet Diameter
s= Planet Rotation Periods Number In Its Orbital Period
I= Planet Orbital Inclination
v2, s, r and I be belonged to one planet and v1 be belonged to another planet
The Equation Role
- The equation proves that, Planet diameter be created based on geometrical rule and as a function in this planet motion data –
- That tells, the motion was found and defined before this planet creation and for that the planet diameter be created depending on this planet motion data
The Equation Significance
- The Equation proves the argument
- By One Force The Solar Planets Be Created And Moving
- The sun didn't cause any planet creation, So (No planet moves by the sun gravity)
- By One Force and From One Energy All Planets Matters And Their Distances Be Created And This Energy Causes The Planets Motions.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
Geometry Of Light Motion
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- The planets matters and their distances be created from The Same One Energy.
- This one energy is provided by one light beam
- This light beam travels with a velocity =1.16 million km per second
Paper objective
- The paper is consisted of 2 parts
- Part no. (I) provides My Research Presentation Summary
- Part no. (II) discusses The Geometry Of Light Motion
- Let's refer to them in following..
Part No. (I) Research Presentation Summary
My research presentation is consisted of 6 points which are
(1)
Planet Orbital Distance Equation (My 1st Equation)
(2)
The Refutation Of Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
(No Planet moves by The Sun Gravity)
(3)
The Research Method explanation And Using to prove 2 basic new discoveries which are:
(Mars Migration Theory) and
(The moon using of an angle θ between its motion direction and its orbit level)
(4)
The Research hypothesis (The planets matters and their distances be created from One Energy)
That's why (The Solar System Be Created Based On One Geometrical Design)
Means (One Geometrical Design was found before the solar system creation)
That refutes (The Big Bang Theory)
(5)
The One Energy Is Provided By One Light Beam
(6)
The light beam travels with a velocity 1.16 million km per second.
That refutes (The hypothesis of the Special Theory of Relativity)
Part No. (II) Geometry Of Light Motion
What's the direct question behind this paper?
The matter and space are created from one light beam – means – the matter and space are forms of light forms –
Now, if this is a fact,
Why do we need to fight so hard to prove this very simple and clear fact?
Because
The light uses unknown geometrical rules –
By that this paper should be similar to a book of Geometry – because – it shows types of geometrical rules are unknown for us and not found in our Geometry books
It's a direct answer but not clear
Why don't we know these rules? Why can't we catch them in lab experiments? If so many unknown geometrical rules of light motion are found, and we couldn't catch them during the empirical physics history why can we do that now? Can any one stole at end the Geometry book from the heaven library?!
I have brought with me the planets data and later I have discovered that all unknown geometrical rules be hidden in them.
Shortly
The light creates the matter and space by using unknown geometrical rules – and – we can discover these geometrical rules by using planets data analysis – means – we can know these geometrical rules only if we can read correctly the planets data – for example – if we can answer the question (why the moon diameter =3475 km?) that will help us to discover the rules based on which the moon diameter be created.
So I will present my research summary then we should discuss these unknown geometrical rules.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
A Research Presentation Summary
Abstract
My research presentation is consisted of 6 points which are
(1)
Planet Orbital Distance Equation (My 1st Equation)
(2)
The Refutation Of Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity (No Planet moves by the sun gravity)
(3)
The Research Method explanation and using to prove (Mars Migration Theory) and (The moon using of an angle θ between its motion direction and its orbit level)
(4)
The Research hypothesis (The planets matters and their distances be created from One Energy)
That's why (The Solar System Be Created Based On One Geometrical Design)
Means (One Geometrical Design was found before the solar system creation)
That refutes (The Big Bang Theory)
(5)
The One Energy Is Provided By One Light Beam
(6)
The light beam travels with a velocity 1.16 million km per second.
That refutes (The hypothesis of the Special Theory of Relativity)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
Toxic effects of heavy metals : Lead and Arsenicsanjana502982
Heavy metals are naturally occuring metallic chemical elements that have relatively high density, and are toxic at even low concentrations. All toxic metals are termed as heavy metals irrespective of their atomic mass and density, eg. arsenic, lead, mercury, cadmium, thallium, chromium, etc.
Salas, V. (2024) "John of St. Thomas (Poinsot) on the Science of Sacred Theol...Studia Poinsotiana
I Introduction
II Subalternation and Theology
III Theology and Dogmatic Declarations
IV The Mixed Principles of Theology
V Virtual Revelation: The Unity of Theology
VI Theology as a Natural Science
VII Theology’s Certitude
VIII Conclusion
Notes
Bibliography
All the contents are fully attributable to the author, Doctor Victor Salas. Should you wish to get this text republished, get in touch with the author or the editorial committee of the Studia Poinsotiana. Insofar as possible, we will be happy to broker your contact.
DERIVATION OF MODIFIED BERNOULLI EQUATION WITH VISCOUS EFFECTS AND TERMINAL V...Wasswaderrick3
In this book, we use conservation of energy techniques on a fluid element to derive the Modified Bernoulli equation of flow with viscous or friction effects. We derive the general equation of flow/ velocity and then from this we derive the Pouiselle flow equation, the transition flow equation and the turbulent flow equation. In the situations where there are no viscous effects , the equation reduces to the Bernoulli equation. From experimental results, we are able to include other terms in the Bernoulli equation. We also look at cases where pressure gradients exist. We use the Modified Bernoulli equation to derive equations of flow rate for pipes of different cross sectional areas connected together. We also extend our techniques of energy conservation to a sphere falling in a viscous medium under the effect of gravity. We demonstrate Stokes equation of terminal velocity and turbulent flow equation. We look at a way of calculating the time taken for a body to fall in a viscous medium. We also look at the general equation of terminal velocity.
Observation of Io’s Resurfacing via Plume Deposition Using Ground-based Adapt...Sérgio Sacani
Since volcanic activity was first discovered on Io from Voyager images in 1979, changes
on Io’s surface have been monitored from both spacecraft and ground-based telescopes.
Here, we present the highest spatial resolution images of Io ever obtained from a groundbased telescope. These images, acquired by the SHARK-VIS instrument on the Large
Binocular Telescope, show evidence of a major resurfacing event on Io’s trailing hemisphere. When compared to the most recent spacecraft images, the SHARK-VIS images
show that a plume deposit from a powerful eruption at Pillan Patera has covered part
of the long-lived Pele plume deposit. Although this type of resurfacing event may be common on Io, few have been detected due to the rarity of spacecraft visits and the previously low spatial resolution available from Earth-based telescopes. The SHARK-VIS instrument ushers in a new era of high resolution imaging of Io’s surface using adaptive
optics at visible wavelengths.
Phenomics assisted breeding in crop improvementIshaGoswami9
As the population is increasing and will reach about 9 billion upto 2050. Also due to climate change, it is difficult to meet the food requirement of such a large population. Facing the challenges presented by resource shortages, climate
change, and increasing global population, crop yield and quality need to be improved in a sustainable way over the coming decades. Genetic improvement by breeding is the best way to increase crop productivity. With the rapid progression of functional
genomics, an increasing number of crop genomes have been sequenced and dozens of genes influencing key agronomic traits have been identified. However, current genome sequence information has not been adequately exploited for understanding
the complex characteristics of multiple gene, owing to a lack of crop phenotypic data. Efficient, automatic, and accurate technologies and platforms that can capture phenotypic data that can
be linked to genomics information for crop improvement at all growth stages have become as important as genotyping. Thus,
high-throughput phenotyping has become the major bottleneck restricting crop breeding. Plant phenomics has been defined as the high-throughput, accurate acquisition and analysis of multi-dimensional phenotypes
during crop growing stages at the organism level, including the cell, tissue, organ, individual plant, plot, and field levels. With the rapid development of novel sensors, imaging technology,
and analysis methods, numerous infrastructure platforms have been developed for phenotyping.
Professional air quality monitoring systems provide immediate, on-site data for analysis, compliance, and decision-making.
Monitor common gases, weather parameters, particulates.
Nutraceutical market, scope and growth: Herbal drug technologyLokesh Patil
As consumer awareness of health and wellness rises, the nutraceutical market—which includes goods like functional meals, drinks, and dietary supplements that provide health advantages beyond basic nutrition—is growing significantly. As healthcare expenses rise, the population ages, and people want natural and preventative health solutions more and more, this industry is increasing quickly. Further driving market expansion are product formulation innovations and the use of cutting-edge technology for customized nutrition. With its worldwide reach, the nutraceutical industry is expected to keep growing and provide significant chances for research and investment in a number of categories, including vitamins, minerals, probiotics, and herbal supplements.
Nutraceutical market, scope and growth: Herbal drug technology
Uranus Effect On Mars Migration
1. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawdrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
1
Uranus Effect On Mars Migration1
The Author Authorized To Be Used By
Mr. Gerges Francis Tawdrous
A Student–Physics Department- Physics &
Mathematics Faculty –
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
(RUDN University) - Moscow – Russia
Dr. Budochkina, Svetlana Aleksandrovna
Associate Professor (Mathematical Analysis and
Theory of Functions Department)
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia (RUDN
University) - Moscow – Russia
Phone +201022532292
E-Mail: mrwaheid@gmail.com
Curriculum Vitae http://vixra.org/abs/1902.0044
Phone +7 (495) 952-35-83
E-Mail: budochkina-sa@rudn.ru, sbudotchkina@yandex.ru
Website
http://web-local.rudn.ru/web-local/prep/rj/index.php?id=2944&p=19024
The Assumption Of S. Virgin Mary -Written in Cairo – Egypt –17th
April 202023
Abstract4
Paper Hypotheses5
1- Uranus had effected on Mars Migration and defined its Displacement –i.e.– Mars6
Displacement (144 mkm) was defined before Mars Migration and this definition is7
done by Uranus Effect.8
2- The Solar System Distances are distributed geometrically because Planet Motion9
depends on light motion10
Let's Review Mars Migration Theory in following:11
12
Mars Migration Theory Revision:13
- Mars original orbital distance was 84 mkm. and Mars had immigrated from it to14
its current orbital distance 227.9 mkm15
- Through Mars Motion from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm, Mars had collided with Venus16
and then Mars had collided with Earth also.17
- From the Collisions debris The Earth Moon was created –and Mars had found its18
moons. And the rest debris had attracted by Jupiter and created The Asteroid Belt19
20
The Giant-Impact Hypothesis is in consistency with Mars immigration theory21
But22
- Instead of the (Supposed Planet) Theia, Mars itself made the collisions- and23
caused the Earth –Moon Creation – through Mars Motion from (84 mkm) to24
(227.9 mkm)25
26
Mars Immigration Theory solves The Giant-Impact Hypothesis difficulties:2728
I. Why Venus Has No Moon? – Because Mars had immigrated and moved from 8429
mkm to 227.9 mkm and pushed all debris in its motion direction – far from30
Venus – So Venus had found no debris around to create its own Moon - But Earth31
has a greater Mass and the debris lost their motion high momentum at Earth32
Position– so Earth could attract some debris and create its moon33
II. The Lunar Magma Ocean (LMO) Origin– is Venus – because the moon is34
created by 3 planets debris (Venus – Earth – Mars) – So their rocks are found in it35
III. Why The Iron Oxide (Feo) of the Moon= (13%)? Because The rate (13%) is a36
middle between Mars rate (18%) and the terrestrial mantle (8%).37
2. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawdrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
2
IV. Why Mars diameter (and Mass) are decreased through the history? Because1
of the collisions – Mars diameter lost around ( 4.1 %) (And Mars mass also which2
causes difficulties for Mars gravitation equation)3
V. Mars migration is done Because of The Sun Creation Process4
5
VI. Is there a possibility that Mars will return to its original point (84 mkm)? Yes6
7
VII. Why? Because the Planet orbital distance is defined relative to its diameter (and8
Mass) –Mars now is in the wrong Position- but forced to still because of the sun9
effect.10
11
A Conclusion12
The Giant-impact hypothesis supports Mars migration Theory13
14
Paper Objectives:15
16
(1st
Objective) :17
The Paper tries to show and prove Uranus Effect On The Solar System Geometry and18
uses Mars Migration Event as an example shows Uranus Effect19
20
(2nd
Objective) :21
The Paper tries to prove that – Planet Motion depends on Light Motion22
That means23
If we can't see the light motion – but because – The light Motion causes the general24
distribution of the solar system distances – and the planet has to move following the25
light motion through these distances themselves – because of that – the light motion26
effect on the planet motion is a fact can be concluded easily by Planet Data Analysis.27
28
29
Paper Contents:30
31
1- Introduction32
2- Methodology33
3- Mars Migration Theory Proves (Revision)34
4- Uranus Effect On The Solar System Geometry35
5- The cycle 2737 years is related to the sun life cycle36
37
38
39
3. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawdrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
3
1- Introduction1
We still discuss Mars Migration Theory2
Let's remember the main question we tried to solve3
4
Why Mars had migrated from its original orbital distance (84 mkm) to its current5
(227.9 mkm)?? Specifically.. Why had moved a displacement =144 mkm??6
The answer was as following:7
- Uranus effected on Mars migration process and forced Mars (new) motion to be8
controlled by the Cycle (27.3 days = The Earth Moon orbital period) – Where I9
have claimed that this Cycle 27.3 days is created by Uranus and Uranus forced10
Mars to move relative to it!11
- Why this Cycle 27.3 days is so basic one?!12
- How could Uranus do that?13
- How this Cycle 27.3 days control (new) Mars orbital period 687 days?!14
o 687 days =27.3 days x 25.2 (but 25.2 degrees = Mars Axial Tilt) – why15
such equation can prove the claim?!16
- Let's leave these questions to be solved later,17
18
- I claimed also – that – Uranus forced Mars (new) Motion to be controlled by the19
rate 1.9 (and 1.9 deg = Mars orbital inclination = 1/Mars Motion degrees daily)20
o 687 days =365.25 days (Earth Orbital Period) x 1.921
- Based on that Uranus had defined 2 basic values of Mars (new) Motion and forced22
Mars to migrate to its new (current) orbital distance 227.9 mkm –23
24
- This idea details will be discussed deeply in this paper – here we interest just in25
the concept…26
27
- The basic absent point in our astrophysics book concerning the solar system28
motion is the light motion….29
o Light moves in front of the planet – and the planet is just a follower –30
o The light moves and creates the distance (space) – and the light classifies31
these distances according to the light motions32
o The planet has to move through these distances themselves – and because of33
that the light motions can be concluded clearly from the planet motions34
Regardless – This Mystery – what's Uranus role in that?35
36
- Uranus makes the distribution of these distances for the other planets – means –37
Uranus defines the distances for each planets! That means – Urauns defined Earth38
orbital distance to be 149.6 mkm and Mars earth distance to be 78.3 mkm39
- Mars Migration Event provides us the chance to prove this fact and show that40
"Uranus Is The Heaven Governor"41
4. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawdrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
4
2- Methodology1
After the previous mystery – no one will interest to read my paper! –2
So –what can I do to prove that – It's astrophysics serious paper?!3
4
How the matter is created?56
Who can imagine that, the planet motion depends on light motion?! but what's the7
planet? What's the matter? What's a rock you find on a road? How to create a matter?8
9
Lorentz Transformations is my basic help in this discussion – again10
11
Is Lorentz length Contraction Phenomenon a real phenomenon effect on the12
particle own nature, or it's just illusion of measurement? My answer is13
14
Lorentz length Contraction Phenomenon is a real phenomenon Why?15
Because16
(1st
) Empirical results prove these features (length contraction- mass increasing)- and17
We need to protect the physical experimental measurements credibility- means we18
attribute any properties to any particle based on experimental results ….And19
20
(2nd
) If the particle real (and correct) data is found when this particle motion relative21
to me = zero, that means I'm The Universe Reference Point.22
23
The next question is ready24
Why particle data (length and mass) can be changed with high velocity motion?25
Now we can see that – the paper discussion is a serious one26
How can the planet motion depend on light motion? this hard question can be27
answered easily if we know how the matter is created? let's deepen our puzzle2829
2 observers travel with light velocity – how each one will see the other? No30
difference in velocity between their motions – so each observer will see the other as a31
matter (a Particle)32
That's my situation – no difference in velocity between my motion and my computer33
motion – so if we both are in a spacecraft moves with light velocity nothing will34
change we both still matters35
The argument tells us that – what we see as matter may be works relative to another36
observer as a light beam – so if the light travels in front of the planet and the planet37
follows this light beam motion – this idea is no longer be considered as a mystery38
39
Methodology40
How the previous discussion can explain the research methodology?41
I use the planets data analysis to conclude the geometrical rules on which the solar42
system is created far from the daily experiences.43
Shortly44
1- I compare between the planets data and the physics acceptable theories to see if45
there's a consistency between both46
2- I compare between the planets data with each other to see if they are independent47
or dependent on each other..48
5. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawdrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
5
3- Mars Immigration Proves Revision (5 Proves)1
2
(1st
proof) The Giant –Impact Hypothesis (The Geological Proves)3
4
(2nd
proof) The Planets Order Analysis5
6
(3rd
proof) Mars Immigration Results7
a- The Earth Moon Creation8
b- Mars Moons Creation9
c- Mars Diameter (and Mass) decreasing10
d- The Asteroid Belt Creation11
12
(4th
proof) Planet Effect On Its Neighbor13
14
(5th
proof) Mar Immigration Motion Direction15
16
17
(1st
proof) The Giant –Impact Hypothesis (The Geological proves)18
As the paper abstract shows how Mars theory is in consistency with The Giant-19
Impact hypothesis – also Mars immigration theory answers many basic questions face20
the giant –impact hypothesis –as we have discussed–21
Why Venus has no moon?22
because Mars Motion was from the point (84 mkm) to (227.9 mkm)– so the direction23
of Motion is defined - and Mars Motion pushed all debris to move with Mars that24
made a wave pushed all debris far from Venus – So Venus Couldn't create a moon for25
it. then these debris lost their high motions momentum when reach to Earth position26
and because Earth mass is greater than Venus – Earth could attracted some debris and27
created from them its moon –28
Mars Moons supports this description because Mars with small mass could attracted29
2 moons – How?30
Because the debris high momentum is lost already, and its motion became so weak31
even Mars could attracted its moons –32
Also the rest debris was attracted by Jupiter and created The Asteroid Belt.33
34
Please review The Giant –Impact Hypothesis -35
The Lunar Magma Ocean (LMO) Origin– is Venus –36
This solution is so important, it solves a serious difficulty – as explained before37
Now the question is why Mars had immigrated when the sun is created? we have to38
discuss that later…39
40
Why Mars original orbital distance was 84 mkm?41
Because the planet orbital distance depends on its diameter and mass – but the order42
is disturbed by Mars immigration and we don't see it now – the planets order analysis43
we should discuss in the following point…44
45
46
6. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawdrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
6
(2nd
proof) The Planets Order Analysis1
Mars immigration theory is born basically based on the planets order analysis2
3
(Mercury – Venus – Earth)4
This order of planets shows an order in planets diameters, masses and orbital distance5
– the order rule is6
A Greater Diameter Or Mass Needs A Greater Orbital Distance7
8
If this order controls all planets so Mars should be the second planet after Mercury –9
But –10
(Jupiter – Saturn –Uranus – Neptune – Pluto)11
the outer planets order shows that the rule depends on planet diameter (and not mass12
because Uranus Diameter is greater than Neptune but less Mass) and the rule is13
reversed from the previous one14
i.e.15
A Greater Diameter Needs A Shorter Orbital Distance –16
This analysis refers to that Mars may be found in a wrong position in the planets17
order and this wrong position causes a disturbance for the planets order – based on18
this analysis Mars immigration theory can be concluded … to get the correct answer19
we need to know if There's A Real Relationship Between Planet Diameter And20
Orbital Distance. –21
22
23
7. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawdrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
7
(3rd
proof) Mars Immigration Results1
a- The Earth Moon Creation2
b- Mars Moons Creation3
c- The Asteroid Belt Creation4
d- Mars diameter Decreasing (4.1%)5
e- Mars Mass Decreasing (4.1%)6
7
Simply we have a reason to answer Why Venus has no moon but Mars (mass =1/13)8
has 2 moons?!9
The fact shows itself clearly – there were no debris around Venus to create a moon!10
But Mars had!? Why? because of the Motion Direction11
12
Mars had moved from the Point (84 mkm) to the point (227.9 mkm) from the sun and13
pushed all debris with it in the same motion direction – so no debris left around14
Venus – because all debris had moved with Mars in its Motion Direction15
16
Now if we practice such event – what expectation we may conclude?17
Mars Diameter (and Mass) must be decreased18
i.e.19
Mars Diameter (and Mass) must be decreased than their values when Mars was in its20
original orbital distance (84 mkm)21
Can this conclusion be proved?22
The gravitation Equation works only with Saturn and Jupiter Masses – where23
24
25
2627
If Mars Mass is increased by 4.1% the gravitation equation can work28
29
30
31
32
(Equation Error 3.4%)33
Question (1)34
Why don't all planets follow the gravitation equation?!35
Because of Mars immigration which caused disturbance for the planets order36
Question (2)37
Is there any proof that Mars Diameter is decreased by the same rate (4.1%) Yes38
Mercury orbital distance 57.9 mkm = Mercury Diameter 4879 km x 1092
39
Earth orbital distance 149.6 mkm = Earth Diameter 12756 km x 1092
40
Satrun orbital distance 1433.5 mkm = Satrun Diameter 120536 km x 1092
41
Mars (org) orbital distance 84 mkm = Mars (org) Diameter 7070km x 1092
42
43
(Mars Diameter 7070 km is increased than the Mars registered diameter 6792 km44
with 4.1%)45
46
4.3
MassSatrun
MassJupiter
distance)orbital(Jupiter
distance)orbital(Saturn
2
2
0.33MassMercury
0.668MassMars
mkm)84distanceorbitaloriginal(Mars
mkm)57.9distanceorbital(Mercury
2
2
8. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawdrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
8
(4th
proof) Planet Effect On Its Neighbor1
Let's summarize the idea in following…2
3
- I claim each planet effect on its neighbor planet data and motion4
- I provide data shows such effect (for example Earth effects on Mars Motion)5
So6
- If we have found data claiming that – Mars Motion is effected by Mercury Data –7
so this data may refer to that – Mars was a neighbor of Mercury8
I- Data9
(1)10
687 days (Mars orbital period) = 365.25 days (Earth orbital period) x 1.911
687 days (Mars orbital period) = 27.3 days (The moon orbital period) x 25.212
But 25.2 degrees = Mars axial tilt and 1.9 degrees = Mars orbital incaution13
Also 25.2 deg (Mars axial tilt and) = (1.9 deg. Mars orbital incaution) x 13.18 deg.14
Where15
The moon motion degrees daily =13.18 degrees16
We should not limit our discussion for just Data consistency – let's see its depth17
Because18
Mars moves per solar day = 0.524 degrees (=360 degrees /687 days)19
The value 0.524 degrees = (1/1.9) where 1.9 degrees = Mars orbital incaution20
i.e.21
Mars Data (25.2, 1.9, 0.524 …etc) depends on the solar day period of time22
(2)23
4331 days (Jupiter orbital period) = 687 days (Mars orbital period) x 2 π24
II-Discussion25
The previous data shows that Earth and moon on one side and Jupiter on the other26
side all of them effect on Mars orbital period (i.e. effect on Mars Motion)27
More Data28
Equation No. (1)29
3031
Equation No. (2)32
Equation No. (3)33
34
35
36
37
Equation No. (5)38
39
7 deg. (Mercury Orbital Inclination)= 1.9 deg. (Mars Orbital Inclination)+ 5.140
deg. (Earth Moon Orbital Inclination)41
42
524.0
MassMercury
MassMars
)
DiameterMars
DiameterMercury
( 2
93.3
mkm57.9DistanceOrbitalMercury
mkm227.9DistanceOrbitalMars
days175.94DayMercury
days687PeriodOrbitalMars
029.1
days354.36YearSynodicMoon
days365.25PeriodOrbitalEarth
hours24DayEarth
hours24.7DayMars
9. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawdrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
9
(5th
proof) Mar Immigration Motion Direction1
Let's summarize the idea in following2
- The solar system has one defined motion which is the planets revolution around3
the sun4
5
- Mars Motion from (84 mkm) to (227.9 mkm) is a new direction of Motion is6
unknown in the solar system7
8
- In this point I refer to another motion started from Jupiter to Pluto – and this9
motion is in the same direction of Mars immigration Motion which makes Mars10
immigration Motion is a defined motion in the solar system and not a unique one11
12
Please review Jupiter Data Analysis in my previous paper13
The Giant-impact hypothesis supports,, Mars Immigration Theory,, (III)14
https://vixra.org/abs/2003.052115
16
17
18
19
10. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawdrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
10
degrees1461
TiltAxailMercurydeg0.01
1
TiltAxailMoonThedeg6.7
TiltAxailUranusdeg.97.8
x
4- Uranus Effect On The Solar System Geometry1
4-1 Uranus prevents the Planets Overturn Motions Around The Sun2
4-2 Uranus classifies The Other Planets Distances3
4-3 Uranus Effect On The Sun Creation4
5
4-1 Uranus prevents The Planets Overturn Motions Around The Sun6
7
Let's summarize the idea in following:8
9
- Uranus Effect Geometrically is A Vertical Effect10
11
- Uranus effect On The Planets Axial Tilts12
13
- Uranus Vertical Effect Aims To Prevent Any Overturn Vertically To Be14
Done By Any Planet Around The Sun15
16
- By that, Uranus help to unify the planets revolutions direction around the sun.17
Now – let's prove this idea in following:18
I- Data19
(1)20
(2)21
90.8 degrees = 0.8 degrees x 113.45 degrees22
(3)23
97.8 degrees (Uranus axial tilt) = 90 +1.1 degrees +6.7 degrees (Moon Axial Tilt)24
(4)25
97.8 degrees = 90 degrees + 7.8 degrees26
(5)27
98.6 deg. x 5.18 deg. (Moon orbital inclin.) = 511.1 deg. (Planets Axial Tilts Total)28
(6)29
98.6 deg. x 1.8 deg. (Neptune orbital inclination) = 177.4 deg. (Venus Axial Tilt)30
(98.6 degrees = 97.8 deg Uranus axial tilt +0.8 deg Uranus orbital inclination)31
(7)32
97.8 deg (Uranus axial tilt)= 0.8 deg (Uranus Orbit.) x 122.5 deg (Pluto Axial Tilt)33
(8)34
23.45 deg (Earth Axial Tilt) = 29.2 degrees x 0.8 deg (Uranus orbital inclination)35
(9)36
1.44 degrees = 1.8 degrees x 0.8 degrees37
(10)38
97.8 = 19 x5.15 and 98.6 =19 x 5.18 and 511.1 = 98.6 x 5.1839
(11)40
41
42
43
0725.1
degrees91.25
T.AxailUranus97.8
T.AxailEarth23.4
T.AxailMars25.2
T.AxailMars25.2
T.AxailSatrun26.7
TiltAxailSatrun26.7
TiltAxailNeptune28.3
11. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawdrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
11
II- Discussion1
Let's simply this discussion as possible –2
Equation No. (1)3
4
5
At first, I don't create the ideas, I try to explain how the data is created6
As we see many planets axial tilts are rated with Uranus Data7
97.8 degrees = Uranus axial tilt but what's 91.25 degrees?8
0.8 degrees = Uranus orbital inclination so (1/0.8 degrees) = 1.25 degrees – so on9
Vertical level 1.25 degrees +90 degrees = 91.25 degrees10
That means11
The equation (97.8 deg/91.25 deg) express Uranus Data only – and based on it many12
planet axial tilts are rated- Why?13
I conclude that – Uranus has an effect on The Planets Axial Tilts –14
15
16
Equation No. (2)17
90.8 degrees = 0.8 degrees (Mercury orbital inclination) x 113.45 degrees18
19
90.8 degrees = Uranus orbital inclination vertically =0.8 degrees +90 degrees20
113.45 degrees = Earth axial tilt 23.45 degrees +90 degrees (Vertically)21
The Equation show the vertical effect of Uranus on Earth Axial Tilt (23.45 deg)22
23
Please note / the simple explanations I provide here try just to explain how the data is24
created – so no confirmation that this data is created by this explanation – but I try to25
find a physical or geometrical explanation in place of to claim that the data is created26
by (pure coincidence)27
28
My basic tool to help this explanation is the rich of Data –that means – when we find29
many equations shows the angle 90 degrees is used frequently with Uranus Data –30
that may gives some credibility that Uranus is perpendicular or use some31
perpendicular effect on the other planet –32
Now – the next question is – why the solar system needs a perpendicular effect? – the33
absent motion is the solar system is the overturn motion which no planet uses – so34
may Uranus vertical effect does that – and by such analysis we reach to the35
conclusion –still the argument depends on the data – and any new data can change its36
conclusions37
38
39
40
0725.1
degrees91.25
T.AxailUranus97.8
T.AxailEarth23.4
T.AxailMars25.2
T.AxailMars25.2
T.AxailSatrun26.7
TiltAxailSatrun26.7
TiltAxailNeptune28.3
12. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawdrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
12
degrees1461
TiltAxailMercurydeg0.01
1
TiltAxailMoonThedeg6.7
TiltAxailUranusdeg.97.8
x
Equation No. (3)1
97.8 degrees (Uranus axial tilt) = 90 +1.1 degrees +6.7 degrees (Moon Axial Tilt)2
This equation tells that – Uranus axial tilt is (almost) perpendicular on Earth Moon3
axial tilt4
That supports the same meaning –5
Please note6
Equation No.2 shows Earth Axial Tilt on vertical level (113.45 degrees) and this7
equation tells that Uranus is Perpendicular on the Moon axial tilt (almost)8
I wish we see the same wave of data9
Here we don’t deal with some random data is created by any pure coincidence10
On the contrary we deal with arranged and directed data is created by a clear effect11
That means – the data is created by Uranus effect12
13
Equation No. (4)14
97.8 degrees (Uranus axial tilt) = 90 degrees + 7.8 degrees15
7.8 degrees = 7 degree (Mercury orbital inclination) + 0.8 degrees (Uranus orbital16
inclination)17
This equation shows Uranus is perpendicular on Mercury – that lead us to conclude18
that – Uranus is almost perpendicular on the inner planets – that explain the different19
data we deal with here20
21
Equation No. (5)22
98.6 deg. x 5.18 deg. (Moon orbital inclin.) = 511.1 deg. (Planets Axial Tilts Total)23
98.6 degrees = 97.8 deg (Uranus axial tilt) +0.8 deg (Uranus orbital inclination)24
The previous equation shows clearly Uranus Effect On The Planets Axial Tilts Total25
Of coure the Equation gives the Earth Moon orbital inclination so specific position26
also – but that means because – Uranus axial tilt is (almost) perpendicular directly on27
The Earth Moon axial tilt and that shows moon specific important for Uranus!28
Equation No.11 shows that even more clear29
Equation No. (11)30
31
32
33
Earth Cycle =1461 days =365 days+365 days +365 days +366 days34
If 1 day = 1 degree35
So the previous 3 axial tilts unify their powers to produce this Cycle 1461 days36
Where we find 1 degree = 1 day? In the Earth moon orbit because the moon orbit37
regresses yearly 19 degrees and that cause change in the eclipse colander 19 days38
A Conclusion39
We have discussed this data before – the data shows a clear consistency between40
Uranus data and the plants axailt Tilts – which may support the idea that Uranus41
effects vertically on the planets axailt tilts to prevent any overtun motion to be done42
by any planet.43
Let's anlyze Uranus ffect on Mars Migration in following…44
13. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawdrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
13
Uranus Effect on Mars Migration1
I- Data2
(1)3
Venus Diameter 12104 km = Mars diameter 6792 km x4
(2)5
3.4 degrees (Venus orbital inclination) x 0.524 degree =6
(3)7
177.4 deg (Venus axial tilt) = 100 x8
(4)9
180.8 degrees = 177.4 deg (Venus axial tilt) + 3.4 deg (Venus orbital inclination)10
(5)11
Mars moves during Venus days (116.7 days) a distance =243 mkm = Mercury12
Motion during Mercury rotation period (58.66 days)13
(6)14
116.7 deg (Saturn axial tilt vertically) =26.7 deg (Saturn axial tilt horizontally) x 4.3715
(4.37 mkm = the sun circumference)16
(7)17
(Nodal Year/ Lunar Sidereal Year) =(Earth Diameter / Venus Diameter)18
(8)19
(Lunar Synodic Year / Nodal Year)= (Mercury Radius / Pluto Diameter)20
(9)21
687 days Mars orbital period +6.2 days = 2 x 346.6 days (Nodal Year)22
(3.1 degrees = Jupiter Axial Tilt)23
24
II- Discussion25
To understand how this data works – we have to discuss the equation No. (4)26
27
This is the main equation behind all changes happened for Mars and even for many28
other planets data29
Let's try to see its depth in following30
31
14. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawdrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
14
Equation No. (4)1
180.8 degrees = 177.4 deg (Venus axial tilt) + 3.4 deg (Venus orbital inclination)2
(1)3
What's this 180.8 degrees?4
It's Uranus orbital inclination (0.8 degrees)5
0.8 degrees +90 +90 =180.8 degrees!6
What does that mean?7
Uranus is perpendicular on Earth Moon orbit – we discussed that before8
97.8 degrees (Uranus axial tilt) – 6.7 degrees (Earth Moon axial tilt) = 91.1 deg9
Not perfectly perpendicular – how to be equal 90 degrees? We discussed that before10
Now11
The sun is perpendicular on Earth…!12
That means – the Sun and Uranus are 2 points on the same straight line – for that13
reason the value 180.8 degrees is seen14
(2)15
90000 mkm = C2
when?? When the time =1 second16
90000 mkm = π3
x 2872.5 mkm (Uranus Orbital Distance)17
where π3
= (Uranus axial tilt / Jupiter axial tilt)18
The Sun rays are produced from C2
19
That means – the sun is created with the distance 2872.5 mkm – i.e. the sun and the20
distance 2872.5 mkm are created together in the same equation – and that makes21
Uranus is the first planet connected with the sun after creation22
This is the reason – Why Uranus is the governor of the heaven!23
(3)24
Let's return to the equation25
180.8 degrees = 177.4 deg (Venus axial tilt) + 3.4 deg (Venus orbital inclination)26
Venus data (axial tilt and orbital inclination) are created based on Uranus orbital27
inclination- So the value 180.8 degrees is transported to Venus28
Shortly –29
Uranus sent to Venus his instruction and Venus told Mars them!30
How??31
179.9 degrees = 177.4 deg (Venus axial tilt) + 2.5 deg (Saturn orbital inclination)32
So 180.8 degrees - 179.9 degrees =0.9 degrees !!33
About what we fight here?34
15. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawdrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
15
About 0.1 degrees1
Please remember2
1.9 deg = Mars orbital inclination = 1.8 deg (Neptune orbital inclination) +0.1 deg3
Why we need it?4
Because by the rate 1.9 – Mars (New) diameter =6792 km will be created and then5
Mars will remember forever that he has to move daily 0.524 degrees6
And what we have? 0.9 degrees !! So7
1 degree = 0.9 degrees + 0.1 degree8
Where is the 1 degree??9
Let's tell the story10
Mercury Axial Tilt was 1 degree and Pluto was Mercury Moon – in that time – Mars11
was the next planet after Mercury – Venus axial tilt was (π)1/2
12
13
With The Sun Creation – some great changes were done – as following:14
- Mercury axial tilt became 0.01 degrees15
- Venus axial tilt received this difference to save the planet data for that (π)1/2
=16
1.774 degrees became 177.4 degrees17
- The decreasing of Mercury axial tilt from 1 degree to 0.01 degree forced Pluto18
to move far from Mercury with 1 orbital distance (57.9 mkm) for each point of19
the difference from 1 to 0.01 that means Pluto had to move 57.9 mkm x 10020
- One more important change was happened – the basic value 180 degrees is21
changed to be 179.9 degrees – that means – no any triangle (for example) in22
the solar system its angles total =180 degrees – No one – the solar system lost23
already the value 0.1 degree and because of that the solar system machine has24
to depend on the value 179.9 degrees which is created by Venus & Saturn25
cooperation.26
Let's remember the question…what's this 1 degree? Mercury Axial Tilt – no27
longer is found- but what- is it removed from the geometrical structure?- No it works28
in the solar system geometrical structure but not seen as the other data – Mercury29
kept its impression – 360 mkm = Mercury orbital circumference = 360 degrees30
Also based on Mercury (supposed) axial tilt (1 degree) Jupiter diameter is created31
1 million km / 7 = 142984 km =Jupiter diameter32
Also Jupiter orbital circumference 4879 mkm = Mercury diameter 4879 km x 133
mkm34
16. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawdrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
16
(4)1
97.8 deg (Uranus axial tilt) = 90 +7.8 degrees2
7.8 deg = 7 deg (Mercury orbital inclination) + 0.8 deg (Uranus orbital inclination)3
The previous equation shows Uranus effect on Mercury orbital inclination4
Shortly5
The inner planets were effected by the sun creation process – and this effect is done6
by Uranus effect on the inner planets data7
(5)8
Saturn is Uranus right hand –9
Through Saturn and based on it Uranus can practice its great effect on the inner10
planets11
That explains why Saturn Orbital Distance = Saturn Uranus Distance12
(6)13
That may explain the equation No. (6)14
116.7 deg (Saturn axial tilt vertically) =26.7 deg (Saturn axial tilt horizontally) x 4.3715
(4.37 mkm = the sun circumference)16
17
Shortly18
Mars New Motion is defined before Mars immigration and the planets data was19
changed to work as bridge to transport the defined motion from Uranus to Mars20
This process is done basically depend on Venus and Saturn21
That explain22
Why Mars orbital circumference = Saturn orbital distance23
That also can explain the following data24
- Saturn Diameter 120536 km =Venus Diameter 12104 km x π2
25
- Saturn Orbital Distance 1433.5 mkm = (Venus Circumference)2
(Error 1%)26
- Saturn Mass = Venus Mass x 116.75 (where 116.75 days = Venus Day Period)27
- 116.75 deg = 26.7 degrees (Saturn axial tilt) +90 degrees28
Note Please29
- In Kepler 3rd
Law (p2
/ d3
= constant) –when weuse the soalr planets data in this30
law – the constant will be =2531
- Where Mars axial tilt =25.2 degrees – and we know that Mercaury axial tilt32
was 1 degree and because of that (25.2 degrees /1 degree) = 25.233
- This explains the great configuration between mars and the other planets after34
Mars immigration.35
36
17. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawdrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
17
3-2 Uranus classifies The Other Planets Distances1
Uranus Effect is so important to consider to help us to analyze Earth Jupiter distance2
3
Let's summarize the idea in following:4
5
I- Data (Distances)6
- Jupiter Orbital Distance (778.6 mkm) x 0.8 = Earth Orbital Distance 629 mkm (1%)7
8
- Uranus Mars Distance (2644.6mkm) x0.8= Uranus Jupiter Distance 2090 mk(1.2%)9
10
- 187 mkm x 0.8= 149.6 mkm (Earth Orbital Distance)11
12
- 1622mkm(Uranus Neptune Distance) x0.8= 1284mkm (Earth Saturn Distance) (1%)13
14
II- More Data (Velocities)15
0.8 x Uranus Velocity = Neptune Velocity (0.7%)16
0.8 x Earth Velocity = Mars Velocity x 0.9917
0.8 x Venus Velocity = Earth Moon Velocity18
19
Discussion20
Uranus Position defines The Sun Position In The Solar System21
22
The previous sentence tells us the basic idea in this paper – our deep discussion here23
tries to shows that, Uranus is the responsible to define the sun position in the sky24
25
This idea is built on the important equation No. (7)26
90000 mkm = 2872.5 mkm (Uranus orbital distance) x π3
27
This equation we have discussed frequently before28
29
This equation tells us that, the sun rays is created by c2
whose time period =1 second30
And because of that c2
= 90000 mkm31
32
Uranus orbital distance 2872.5 mkm is created by π3
(where π3
= Uranus axial tilt/33
Jupiter axial tilt)34
That means π3
is the direct interaction between Uranus and Jupiter axial tilts effects35
And that means36
The sun is created with a distance 2872.5 mkm37
i.e.38
The sun is not a point – it's a straight line created together in one process –this39
straight line length =2872.5 mkm and this line has 2 points on it 1st
point is the sun40
and the 2nd
point is Uranus–this is NOT similar to any other planet because the value41
2872.5 mkm is created from c2
which is the source of energy42
43
18. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawdrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
18
Note Please1
Here we don't discuss the origin of the value c2
- we here start with c2
and move with2
the production process of the sun rays – the basic hypothesis we should remember is3
that, Distance = Energy … i.e. Space = Energy4
5
So the value c2
produces the sun rays and Uranus orbital distance with the sun6
Based on this idea – we may conclude the following7
8
(1st
Conclusion)9
Uranus defines the sun position because they were created with the same distance10
(2872.5 mkm)11
Based on that the other solar planets define the sun position in their orbital12
circumferences based on Uranus position in the sky13
14
(2nd
Conclusion)15
Uranus classifies the distances between the planets – and for that reason – Uranus16
orbital inclination rate (0.8) defines many different distances in the solar system17
As we will discuss deeply in the next point which is18
19
(Mars Jupiter Distance analysis)20
21
19. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawdrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
19
Mars Jupiter Distance Analysis1
How Mars Jupiter Distance is created? Let's divide it into basic parts (Figure No.1)2
The Figure Explanation … (A) Point is found at 304 mkm from the sun3
(B) Point is found at 185.1 mkm from the sun AB = Venus Mars Distance4
From B to Jupiter the distance =595 mkm5
I-Data6
7
Equation No. (9)8
304 degrees 2
= 97.8 degrees (Uranus Axial Tilt) x 3.1 degrees (error 0.2%)9
10
Equation No. (10)11
2872.5 mkm (Uranus orbital distance) = 304 mkm x 9.44912
13
Equation No. (11)14
304 mkm x 0.8 = 243.2 mkm ….And15
304 mkm – 57.9 mkm = 246.1 mkm but 246.1 mkm x 0.99 = 243.6 mkm16
17
Equation No. (12)18
187 mkm x 0.8 = 149.6 mkm …..And19
180 mkm x 0.8 = 144 mkm20
21
Equation No. (13)22
187 mkm xπ =589 mkm23
but24
(i) 589 mkm =0.363 mkm x 1622.7 mkm25
(ii) 589 = (Venus rotation period / Jupiter rotation period)26
(iii) 589.6 days = 243 days (Venus Rotation Period)+346.6 days (Nodal Year)27
28
Equation No. (14)29
216.4 mkm x 1.392 mkm = 304 mkm x 0.9930
Note please31
216.4 mkm x 3.1 = 670.4 mkm32
33
20. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawdrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
20
Notice No. 11
Before to start our discussion – let's explain how Jupiter orbital distance is created –2
In the previous figure we have 2 basic distances3
(1st
Distance) from the sun to the point (A) =304 mkm4
Light with known velocity (0.3 mkm/sec) passes this distance is 1013 seconds5
6
(2nd
Distance) from the point (A) to Jupiter = 595 mkm7
Light with known velocity (0.3 mkm/sec) passes this distance is 33 minutes (=19808
seconds)9
But10
1980 mkm=the 3 inner planets orbital circumferences total (Mercury +Venus +Earth)11
12
1013 mkm is the distance between Mars & Jupiter when both of them be on 213
different sides from the sun (227.9 mkm +778.6 mkm = 1006 mkm (error 0.7%)14
That means15
The distance from the sun to Jupiter is defined based on the inner planets orbital16
circumferences values, dividing into 2 parts – the 3 inner planets together define the17
distance 595 mkm and Mars with Jupiter define the distance 304 mkm18
But19
595 seconds x1.16 = 690.2 mkm but Mars Orbital Period =687 days (error 0.5%)20
21
II-Discussion22
Equation 9 & 10 refer to that the value 304 is related to Uranus data strongly,23
We will start with Equation No. 11 because we want to discuss how this distance is24
created25
Equation No. (11)26
304 mkm x 0.8 = 243.2 mkm ….And27
304 mkm – 57.9 mkm (mercury orbital distance) = 246.1 = 243.2 mkm (error1%)28
i.e.29
we have 2 distances from Point A to Mercury = 243 mkm (error 1%)30
and from Point A to the sun = 304 mkm31
where 304 mkm x 0.8 = 243 mkm32
Uranus divides the distances into 2 distances with the rate 0.833
We remember (Uranus effect 3-4)34
Jupiter orbital distance x0.8 = Jupiter Earth Distance35
Why does Uranus do that?36
Because Uranus defines The Sun Position In The Sky For The Other Planets37
Uranus is the responsible to define the sun position for other planets38
And for that reason Uranus divides the distances between the planets as we see in the39
distance between Jupiter and Mars (or Earth Jupiter Distance)40
Pleaser review this full discussion in my previous paper41
My Research Basic Arguments (V) https://vixra.org/abs/2002.027842
But let's here see Uranus effect on Mars Displacement.43
21. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawdrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
21
Uranus Effect On Mars Displacement1
I - Data2
(1)3
180 mkm x 0.8 = 144 mkm4
(2)5
144 mkmx 0.8 = 115.2 mkm6
7
Discussion8
Just 2 equations and all components are know except 180 mkm –what's it??9
10
144 mkm = Mars Displacement =227.9 mkm – 84 mkm11
115.2 mkm = 115.2 degrees = 90 degrees + 25.2 degrees (= Mars Axial Tilt)12
13
What's this 180 mkm??!14
Let's remember 115.2 degrees at first! In following..15
The Value 115.2 degrees16
I-Data17
Group (I)18
(1)19
30589 days (Uranus orbital period)= 27.3 days (Earth Moon orbital period) x 112020
(2)21
113.45 deg (Earth axial tilt on vertical level) x π2
= 112022
(3)23
687 days (Mars orbital period) = 27.3 days (Earth Moon orbital period) x 25.224
(25.2 deg = Mars axial tilt)25
Group (II)26
- Mars Axial Tilt = 25.2 degrees (on the horizontal level)27
- Mars Axial Tilt = 115.2 degrees (on the vertical level 115.2 = 25.2+90)28
- Mars Axial Tilt = 205.2 degrees (where 205.2 degrees = 115.2 +90)29
But30
- Saros Shift angle = 115 degrees ..............And31
- Saros Cycle 6585.39 days = 115 x (180/π)32
Why Venus diameter is so specific one?33
Because34
- The sun diameter = 115.2 x Venus Diameter35
- The sun diameter = 205.2 x Mars Diameter36
Group (III)37
(1)38
25920 mkm = 27.3 x 949 mkm (940 mkm = Earty orbital circumference error 1%)39
(2)40
- 25920 mkm = 180 x 144 mkm and 180 mkm x 0.8 = 144 mkm41
- 144 mkm x 0.8 = 115.2 mkm42
- 144 days x 0.587 mkm / day (Uranus velocity) =84 mkm43
22. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawdrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
22
- 144 mkm = 5.1 x 28.3 (5.1 deg = the moon orbital inclaintion – 28.3 deg =1
Neptune axial titl) -(25.08)2
= 6272
Discussion3
Light with known velocity (0.3 mkm/sec) travels during a solar day (86400 s) a4
distance =25920 mkm5
Why Mars Had Immigrated When The Sun Creation?6
7
(1) Because of the Cycle 27.3 days8
The cycle 27.3 days is defined by Uranus Equation9
30589 days (Uranus orbital period) = 27.3 days (Earth Moon orbital period) x 112010
Please remember – Uranus is the master here11
The Cycle 27.3 days is defined by Uranus Cycle – and Uranus defines Mars Motion12
data (180 mkm -144 mkm -115.2 mkm) – so the Cycle will control Mars New motion13
The Cycle (27.3 days) control Earth Motion by Earth axial tilt (through1120)14
(113.45 deg Earth axial tilt vertically) level) x π2
= 112015
Now16
687 days (Mars orbital period) =27.3 days (Earth Moon orbital period) x 25.217
(Where 25.2 degrees =Mars Axial Tilt)18
But19
The Value 25.2 degrees =Mars Axial Tilt is defined based on Mars & Venus20
diameters rates relative to the sun diameter21
So the value 25.2 is defined already and the cycle 27.3 days is forced by Uranus –22
The master of everything here23
So Mars had to have the orbital period 687 days –24
25
(2) Because The Rate 1.9 should control Mars new Motion26
Let's summarize the idea in following:27
- The rate 1.9 is a genetic instruction transported from planet data to another till28
reach to Mars – why? to create Mars orbital inclination =1.9 degrees! Why? to29
force Mars to move per solar day 0.524 degrees – Why? because this is the30
available Motion for Mars defined by the solar system geometry31
32
I- Data33
(1) Earth diameter 12756 km = Mars diameter 6792 km x 1.934
(1.9 degrees = Mars orbital inclination)35
(2) Earth diameter 12756 km = Mars (original) diameter 7070 km x 1.836
(1.8 degrees = Neptune orbital inclination)37
(3)38
1.9 deg = Mars orbital inclination = 1.8 deg = Neptune orbital inclination +0.1 deg39
(4) Neptune Diameter 49528 km = Mars (original) diameter 7070 km x 740
II- Discussion41
Mars orbital inclination 1.9 deg – is defined based on Neptune orbital inclination with42
addition 0.1 deg – the rate 1.9 is found between Mars (new) diameter and Earth43
23. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawdrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
23
diameter – that means – Mars Diameter decreasing was done based on geometrical1
rule – Mars diameter is done by collisions with Venus and Earth but Not by random2
process – on the contrary – it's done by geometrical rules – as a surgean cut arm for3
some patient –4
Now because Mars orbital period =687 days (defined by Uranus effect) and Mars5
motion daily =0.524 degrees (defined by Uranus effect) –as a result Mars (new)6
orbital distance =227.9 mkm7
AGAIN8
What's this 180 mkm??!9
Equation No. (1)10
180 mkm x 0.8 = 144 mkm11
Let's remember the equation12
Equation No. (4)13
180.8 degrees = 177.4 deg (Venus axial tilt) + 3.4 deg (Venus orbital inclination)14
What's this 180.8 degrees?15
16
It's Uranus axial tilt =0.8 degrees + 90 deg +90 deg …………Why??17
Because18
The sun is created with a straight line – the sun is NOT a point – the sun is a distance19
= 2872.5 mkm and this distance is created by 2 points on it20
One point is occupied by the sun and the other is occupied by Uranus – so between21
both 180 degrees22
That's – again – NOT – Never – be repeated with any other planet! Why?23
Because24
C2
=90000 mkm when the time t = 1 second25
The sun doesn't see 90000 mkm but see only C2
and from this energy C2
the sun rays26
is created27
Uranus doesn't see C2
but see 90000 mkm and Create its orbital distance 2872.5 mkm28
based on Jupiter Uranus axial tilts interaction (π3
)29
AGAIN What's this 180 mkm??!30
180.8 degrees – 0.8 degree = 180 deg31
Uranus uses the straight line with the sun without its orbital inclaintion32
Why? because Mars migration is done through the Basic Straight line between the33
Sun & Uranus – why? Because it's the obligatory motion defined for Mars34
How to prove that?35
The rates 25.2 degrees which became 115.2 degrees and became 115.2 and 205.2 all36
these rates are created as rates between the sun diameter on one side and Venus &37
Mars Diameters on the othr side – where Venus loaded by the same Vaue 180.838
degrees in its data39
That tells clearly – Mars Displacement is defined by the Sun –Uranus relationship40
and transported to Venus which forced directly Mars to follow it.41
Can we prove that?! it's found in the Cycle 2737 let's shows that in following…42
24. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawdrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
24
5- The cycle 2737 years is related to the sun life cycle1
5-1 Preface2
5-2 Venus role in Mars Migration3
5-1 Preface4
December 2012 had many mysteries5
(1st
) this image is seen frequently on media predicting that on6
3rd
December (Mercury- Venus- Saturn) will be perpendicular7
on the 3 Great Pyramids Heads – which is a cycle repeated only8
once each 2737 years!9
(2nd
) Mayan Calendar long Cycle continuous for more than10
5000 years – is completed on 21st
December 2012 – someone told the pyramids11
works as an O'clock for Mayan Cycle!12
(3rd
) A prediction for the greatest Earthquake hit the whole Earth was spreading for13
months before December 2012!14
Nothing happened and every thing is forgotten now15
I have studied the solar system Geometry from this date (November 2012) till now16
trying to know what truth behind all these mysteries17
Mars Immigration Theory provides a very similar earthquake18
19
The Discussion20
(1)21
The Cycle 2737 years depends on Metonic Cycle – where22
2736 years = 19 years x 144 and we know that Metonic Cycle extends for 19 years23
Please Note24
2737 years Cycle depends on 2736 years cycle – because the difference between25
them is 1 year only26
This is we have seen before when27
6939.75 days (Metonic Cycle) – (6585.32 days Saros Cycle) = 354.39 days (lunar28
Synodic year)29
That tells us if 2 great Cycles are different from each other with one small cycle so30
both are creating depending on each other31
(2)32
Also, Please note that, the perpendicular Trajectory on Earth is a feature of the moon33
motion and that means the 3 planets follow the moon motion Trajectory34
(3)35
About 2737 Cycle I have written many papers – the basic point here is that – the36
Cycle 2737 years is related to the sun life cycle –37
For more details about 2737 please read38
39
Is the 2737 Phenomenon a real one? (III) https://vixra.org/abs/2004.031640
Is the 2737 Phenomenon a real one? (II) https://vixra.org/abs/1908.058341
Is the 2737 Phenomenon a real one? https://vixra.org/abs/1901.038142
43
25. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawdrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
25
The Sun Life Cycle depends on 2737 years1
I-Data2
(1)3
627 mkm (Earth Jupiter Distance) = 4.37 mkm (the Sun circumference) x 144 mkm4
(2)5
2737 mkm = 627 mkm (Earth Jupiter Distance) x 4.37 mkm (the Sun circumference)6
(3)7
25920 mkm = 4.37 mkm (the sun circumference) x 5906 mkm (Pluto orbital distance)8
(4)9
90000 mkm = 2872.5 mkm (Uranus orbital distance) x π3
10
11
II-Discussion12
Let's summarize this discussion :13
- If the space = energy – so the sun is created from the Space Energy14
- The sun is created based on the distance 627 mkm (Earth Jupiter Distance)15
- As Equation (3) shows that – the distance 25920 mkm depends on (Pluto orbital16
distance) x (the sun Circumference) (The total energy)17
Similar to that18
- Equation (2) shows that – the Cycle 2737 years depends on (Earth Jupiter distance19
627 mkm) x (the sun Circumference 4.37 mkm) – telling us that – the Cycle 273720
years is related to the sun life cycle21
- Note please – we see the distance 2737 mkm as a time period (2737 years)22
because it's high velocity motion23
- As in the distance 25920 mkm – light with known velocity (0.3mkm/sec) travels24
during a solar day (86400 seconds) a distance = 25920 mkm – this distance we see25
as a time period the precession cycle because it's high velocity motion26
27
Please Note28
- As we have discussed before – the sun is not an independent piece in the solar29
system – on the contrary – it's dependent piece and created by the planets motions30
energies total – that means – the sun production is a similar to any other motion of31
the solar system – just the energies are accumulated in one point – so the sun can't32
be extinguished – because it's a continuous production – but the sun has a cycle of33
life and can be absent for a period before to be birth once again – and because of34
this absence many mars use the chance and return to its original orbital distance –35
because the planet orbital distance is defined based on the planet diameter and36
mass and that what may cause the risk on Earn- the human can overcome this risk37
if we answer how the matter is created?–38
39
to review this idea please read40
Does The Observation Process Effect On The Observed Particle Nature?41
https://vixra.org/abs/2001.033142
43
26. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawdrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
26
5-2 Venus Role In Mars Migration1
I-Data2
670 days x 4.095 mkm/day = 2737 mkm3
4
2737 mkm = a distance from the point 135.5 mkm to Uranus5
4.095 mkm = Mercury velocity daily6
670 mkm = Venus Jupiter Distance7
8
II-Discussion9
Why the distance 670 mkm is used as 670 days or why the period 2737 years is used10
as 2737 mkm ? that because we deal with high velocity motions (light motions11
behind the planets motions)12
13
What does this equation tell?14
15
Venus is a connected point between Jupiter and Uranus – that makes Venus the basic16
point on which Mars Migration Displacement is loaded17
The equation uses mercury velocity with Venus Data18
It's the cooperation between the planets – how to perform? the planet moves depends19
on light motion and the light performs such cases of cooperation20
This discussion isn't finished yet we need to prove that the planets motions depend on21
light motion which we should do in the next paper..22
23
24
25
27. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawdrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
27
References1
2
Can Titius Bode Law Disprove Mars Immigration Theory?3
https://vixra.org/abs/2004.029245
Research Paper "The Solar Planets Order Still Shows More Puzzles"6
https://vixra.org/abs/2004.0086 (German text) https://vixra.org/abs/2004.01657
Mars Immigration Theory8
https://vixra.org/abs/2003.0689 (German text) https://vixra.org/abs/2003.06859
10
The Giant-impact hypothesis supports "Mars Immigration Theory" (III)11
https://vixra.org/abs/2003.052112
Lorentz Length Contraction (More Discussion)13
https://vixra.org/abs/1911.043114
My Research Hypotheses https://vixra.org/abs/1909.040615
16
Dr. Budochkina, Svetlana Aleksandrovna17
Associate professor - Candidate of physico-mathematical sciences (2005)18
http://www.mathnet.ru/eng/person22119
List of publications on Google Scholar
List of publications on ZentralBlatt
https://mathscinet.ams.org/mathscinet/MRAuthorID/757317
http://elibrary.ru/author_items.asp?spin=6087-3245
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3447-0425
http://www.researcherid.com/rid/G-7453-2014
http://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.url?authorId=6507007003
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Svetlana_Budochkina
Full list of publications: http://web-local.rudn.ru/web-local/prep/rj/index.php?id=2944&p=15209
19
Mr.Gerges Francis Tawdrous +20102253229220
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty21
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +20102253229222
Curriculum Vitae http://vixra.org/abs/1902.004423
E-mail mrwaheid@gmail.com24
Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a125
Facebook https://www.facebook.com26
Researcherid https://publons.com/researcher/3510834/gerges-tawadrous/27
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-714728
Quora https://www.quora.com/profile/Gerges-F-Tawdrous29
Google https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=2Y4ZdTUAAAAJ&hl=en30
Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous31
List of publications http://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrous32