A discussion of the ongoing Georgia Coastal Mapping Update, a major effort that is progressing by the collaboration of multiple parties. These parties include FEMA, Georgia Department of Natural Resources, contractors and of course, the local stakeholders.
Presented by Onur Celik, PE, CFM, of CDM Smith and Todd Harris, PMP, CFM of the Georgia Department of Natural Resources at the Association of State Flood Plain Managers (ASFPM) 2015 Conference.
Top Rated Pune Call Girls Bhosari ⟟ 6297143586 ⟟ Call Me For Genuine Sex Ser...
Updating Georgia’s Coastal Maps: Collaboration on my Mind
1. Updating Georgia’s Coastal Maps
Collaboration on my Mind
June 2, 2015
Onur Celik, PE, CFM,
CDM Smith
Todd Harris, PMP, CFM
Georgia Department of
Natural Resources
3. History – Georgia Flood M.A.P. Program
• Increase focus on risk assessment and planning
• Continue partnerships with Federal, State, and Local Agencies
• Acquire and utilize high accuracy topo data
• Deliver risk products and datasets
Enhanced Outreach Program
• Outreach Guidebooks
• Increased Community Engagement
• Robust Website (www.georgiadfirm.com)
Transitioning State Program to align with FEMA’s Risk MAP Program
4. History
• Effective Coastal Studies are dated
– Current surge analysis is 20 to 40+ years old!
Chatham County – ESSA’S JPM Method (1970)
Climate data from 1965 to 1981
Glynn and Camden Counties – SURGE model
update in 1989
• Riverine Studies are partially up-to date
Bryan, Charlton, Effingham, Liberty, Long,
Chatham partially updated in 2014
Camden, Glynn, McIntosh analyses were older
and did not utilize the current LiDAR data or
latest hydraulic models
5. History
– FEMA Funded Risk MAP projects for
10 Counties in Eastern/Coastal Georgia:
• Bryan
• Camden
• Charlton
• Chatham
• Effingham
• Glynn
• Liberty
• Long
• McIntosh
• Newton
7. Collaborating Parties
– FEMA contracted AECOM/Baker for Coastal
Analyses
– Georgia DNR contracted CDM Smith and
Dewberry for Riverine Analyses, Production
– Inland Riverine Analyses completed and
inland counties became effective in 2014
– Coastal Analyses are complete in Spring
- Preliminary Maps will be issued tentatively
in September
11. Analyses and Mapping Approach
• Study Types:
– Coastal
– VE or AE Zones
– LiMWA
– Riverine
– Detailed/Limited Detailed
– Redelineation
– Approximate
12. Coastal Analyses
Determined from
storm surge model
Components of Coastal Flooding:
1. Storm Surge Stillwater Elevation (SWEL)
2. Wave Setup
3. Wave Height
4. Wave Runup
13. Coastal Analyses – Storm Surge
• Set up “mesh” for
hurricane/surge model
• Validated hurricane/surge
model
• Ran hundreds of
hypothetical storms
• Resulting storm surge still
water elevations for the 1%
annual chance event
24. Regulatory Products – FIRM
• Additional Information (Elevations at 1/10’ increments etc)
• New Look, more streamlined legend
Old Format New Format
25. Non-Regulatory Product – Changes Since Last FIRM
• First Time in Georgia
• Provides information to be used for Mitigation/Outreach Activities
26. Non-Regulatory Product – Flood Depth Grid
• First Time in Georgia
• Provides information to be used for Mitigation/Outreach Activities
27. Non-Regulatory Product – Wave Height Grid
• First Time in Georgia
• Provides information to be used for Mitigation/Outreach Activities
Example: Wave Height Grid
28. Non-Regulatory Product – Risk Assessment Grid
• First Time in Georgia
• Provides information to be used for Mitigation/Outreach Activities
29. Non-Regulatory Product – AOMI
• First Time in Georgia
• Provides information to be used for Mitigation/Outreach Activities
Thanks again for being here. In this session, we will discuss the ongoing Georgia Coastal Mapping Update, a major effort that is progressing by the collaboration of multiple parties. These parties include FEMA, Georgia Department of Natural Resources, contractors and of course, the local stakeholders.
For this project, Georgia DNR has undertaken riverine analyses, mapping and outreach activities. DNR’s project manager Todd Harris and myself would like to discuss about this work, and the upcoming products including Georgia’s first non-regulatory products.
First, Todd will provide us the history of Georgia’s map update efforts. He will then give us specifics of this particular project with an emphasis to the outreach activities. Later, I would like to present further details of different study types, and the upcoming products. Finally, we will conclude with the tentative map release schedule and answer questions you may have.
As Todd described, the analyses were separately performed for coastal and riverine areas. The coastal analyses result in determination of coastal VE and AE zones and the maps will present a new feature called LiMWA. We will discuss about this feature in details shortly.
The riverine analyses were performed in detailed/limited detailed, redelineation and approximate methods which all used the latest LiDAR data. The detailed and limited detailed analyses also utilized survey data.
Let’s take a look at them in further detail:
Here is a Visual for coastal analyses components that were taken into consideration:
Stillwater Elevation Before a hurricane makes landfall, the combined effect of circulating winds and drop in air pressure causes a rise in sea level. When it reaches the shoreline, the seafloor forces this rise to increase dramatically. This is called Stillwater Elevation. It is the largest component of coastal flooding.
Wave Setup As waves batter (hit) the coastline for several hours, they tend to “pump” up the water surface higher than the stillwater elevation. This effect is referred to as wave setup.
Wave Crest Elevation ride atop the storm surge plus setup
Wave Runup When waves hit the shoreline, its momentum forces it upward particularly where there are bluffs, dunes, or man-made structures. The additional height is called wave runup.
In order to estimate the stillwater elevations, the coastal team used a very dense mesh of topographic data, investigated the historic events and ran hundreds of hypothetical storms to estimate the magnitude of a storm causing the 1% annual chance event. They then modeled areas that are subject to wave action and runup.
As a result, the coastal floodplain boundaries were determined. The areas determined to have high wave action are V (velocity) Zones. These areas will be subject to waves of 3 feet or higher. The areas being impacted by coastal flooding but with wave heights of less than 3 feet are Coastal A zones. Although these Zones have lower waves they may still be subject to moderate wave action. So, planning purposes the maps will show the limit for the moderate wave action which is defined as waves between 1.5 to 3 feet. This line is called LiMWA – Limit of Moderate Wave Action.
Here is an example of typical coastal mapping with a LiMWA line depicting the landward limit of areas subject to moderate wave action.
After this quick glance to the coastal analyses, let’s talk a little bit about the riverine. All analyses are model backed and utilizing the LiDAR Information. Detailed/limited detailed reaches also included survey data. The visual may provide a perspective to the typical riverine modeling. We use models that calculate flood elevations at the cross-sections based on estimated discharges.
The cross-sections include the topographical information of the river channel and the overbank areas.
We so far covered the background of the project and study types. Now let’s focus on the products. For this project and all later iterations FEMA’s latest standards are followed. These standards bring significant improvements. Georgia is one of the first states getting these products.
Along with the regulatory FIRM and the FIS report, the communities will receive non-regulatory products. This slide shows an example of Changes since Last FIRM product. It is a visualization of changes to the proposed floodplain extents since the last FIRM.
Additional grids allow for visualization of estimated flood characteristics such as flood depth, water surface elevation, multiple frequencies and velocity.
Wave Height grids depicted wave heights in 3 different categories: > 3 ft, 1.5-3 ft and less than 1.5 ft. This was selected due to the LiMWA guidance that was implemented on all coastal studies. Depth of 1.5-3 ft represented LiMWA areas where coastal construction can be regulated differently.
This dataset presents potential economic losses based on flood exposure of building stock including critical infrastructure.
Areas of Mitigation Interest (AoMI) This dataset is an insight into existing or future risk mitigation needs or critical structures.
To sum up, We discussed the scope of this project, collaborating parties and products that will become available. The next step is a flood risk review meeting. At that meeting, the communities will see the workmap products for the first time. Then tentatively on September 30, the communities will receive the preliminary products. Another meeting will follow (CCO Meeting) which will initiate the appeal/comment period. And once all data is finalized the non-regulatory data will also be relesed. So long story short, the products are soon becoming available for your use.
Unless Todd wants to add something, This concludes our agenda.