Conferentie 'Het aanpakken van armoede door middel van erfgoed. Naar een raamwerk voor gemeenschapsmusea', 7 december 2016 @ Huis van Alijn, Gent

1. UNESCO, heritage and
poverty:
towards an ethics of care
Marc Jacobs

3. United Nations
Educational Scientific and Cultural
Organization,
16 November 1945:
• organisatie van de Verenigde Naties voor
onderwijs, wetenschap en cultuur
• bijdragen aan de vrede en de veiligheid in de
wereld door het stimuleren van de
samenwerking tussen staten door onderwijs,
wetenschap, cultuur en communicatie, teneinde
het universele respect voor de gerechtigheid, de
heerschappij van het recht en de rechten van de
mens, te bevorderen zonder onderscheid naar
ras, geslacht, taal of godsdienst
• www.unesco.org

4. UNESCO in the first
decade of the 21st
century
• The Matsuura Era
(even USA returns)
• Globalization,
WWW
Transformations
Discourse, identity!
Glocalisation,
Answers?
• Symbolic capital!
– Recognition, proclamation, …
• Global redistribution or
investment of limited
resources
But crisis/Bokova era

8. Millenniumdoelstellingen:
tegen “2015”

11. :
Convention for the protection of the
World Cultural and Natural Heritage
of 1972
• Monuments & landscapes
• World heritage list
• symbolic capital of
UNESCO
• Influence on heritage
policy world wide
• Effects of the list
Golden Temple of Dambulla, Sri Lanka, inscribed 1991

12. The Midas Touch
• Dionysus offered Midas a
chance for a wish come
true.
• Midas asked that whatever
he might touch should be
changed into gold.
• He touched an oak twig
and a stone and both
turned to gold.
• When he touched his food
it grew rigid and his drink
did harden into golden ice
• World heritage sites &
UNESCO lists

13. • It is in this context that UNESCO’s World Heritage Centre
launched a project in 2002 entitled “Poverty Reduction
through Sustainable World Heritage Management”.. It
aims to promote an approach combining heritage
conservation and sustainable development and to explore
assistance mechanisms for communities. Five properties
inscribed on the World Heritage List or Tentative Lists
were selected: The City of Porto-Novo : ancient districts
and Royal Palace (Benin), Island of Saint-Louis
(Senegal), The Ancient Waterfront Towns in the South of
Yangtze River (China), Town of Luang Prabang (Lao
People's Democratic Republic) and Georgetown
(Guyana).

15. Article 15:
Participation of communities, groups and
individuals
Within the framework of its safeguarding activities of the
intangible cultural heritage, each State Party shall
endeavour to ensure the widest possible participation of
communities, groups and, where appropriate, individuals
that create, maintain and transmit such heritage, and to
involve them actively in its management.

19. UNESCO noted in 2012:
“The post-2015 development agenda should also recognize
the specific contribution that culture as a sector,
encompassing tangible and intangible heritage, cultural
and creative industries and cultural infrastructures, has
made towards achieving sustainable development, as
evidenced in terms of poverty alleviation, social inclusion
and environmental sustainability.”
UNESCO (2012). Culture: a driver and an enabler of sustainable development, Thematic Think Piece,
available at https://en.unesco.org/post2015/sites/post2015/files/Think%20Piece%20Culture.pdf

21. Agenda 2030

22. Armoede / Empowerment
• “Derde wereld”/ontwikkelingslanden
– Afrika als prioriteit
• “Vierde wereld”/”kansengroepen”

26. Sustainable development issues and
ethics on the agenda in the 2010s
Invloed van de Agenda 2030
• Draft directives
• 12 Ethical principles
• Hoofdstuk 6 operational
directives op basis van UN
sdgs (december 2015/June
2016)
• Capacity building
programmes

27. Operational directives SDGs on the
“national level”

29. OD174
• 174. States Parties shall endeavour to ensure that their
safeguarding plans and programmes are fully inclusive of
all sectors and strata of society, including indigenous
peoples, migrants, immigrants and refugees, people of
different ages and genders, persons with disabilities and
members of vulnerable groups, in conformity with Article
11 of the Convention

30. OD175
• 175. States Parties are encouraged to foster scientific
studies and research methodologies, including those
conducted by the communities or groups themselves and
by non-governmental organizations, aimed at
understanding the contributions of intangible cultural
heritage to sustainable development and its importance
as a resource for dealing with development problems and
at demonstrating its value with clear evidence, including
appropriate indicators if possible.

31. VI.2 Inclusive economic development
183. States Parties are encouraged to acknowledge that the
safeguarding of the intangible cultural heritage contributes
to inclusive economic development, and to recognize in this
context that sustainable development depends upon stable,
equitable and inclusive economic growth based on
sustainable patterns of production and consumption and
requires reduction of poverty and inequalities, productive
and decent employment as well as ensuring access to
affordable, reliable, sustainable, renewable and modern
energy for all and improving progressively resource
efficiency in consumption and production.

32. • VI.2.1 Income generation and sustainable livelihoods
• 185. States Parties shall endeavour to recognize, promote
and enhance the contribution of intangible cultural
heritage to generating income and sustaining livelihoods
for communities, groups and individuals. To that end,
States Parties are encouraged to:

33. • (a) foster scientific studies and research methodologies,
including those conducted by the communities and groups
themselves, aimed at identifying and assessing
opportunities that intangible cultural heritage offers for
generating income and sustaining livelihoods for
communities, groups and individuals concerned, with
particular attention to its role in supplementing other forms
of income;

34. • (b) adopt appropriate legal, technical, administrative and
financial measures to:
• b.i. promote opportunities for communities, groups and
individuals to generate income and sustain their livelihood
so that the sustainable practice, transmission and
safeguarding of their intangible cultural heritage can be
ensured;
• b.ii. ensure that the communities, groups and individuals
concerned are the primary beneficiaries of income
generated as a result of their own intangible cultural
heritage and that they are not dispossessed of it, in
particular in order to generate income for others.

35. • VI.2.2 Productive employment and decent work
• 186. States Parties shall endeavour to recognize, promote
and enhance the contribution of intangible cultural
heritage to productive employment and decent work for
communities, groups and individuals.

40. A4 (12 principles), or in another contemporary format, that of a tweet:
“When safeguarding ICH, the widest possible
participation and active involvement of CGIs is
the right thing to do”

41. ICH (on its own)
• EP8) The dynamic and living nature of intangible cultural
heritage should be continuously respected. Authenticity and
exclusivity should not constitute concerns and obstacles in the
safeguarding of intangible cultural heritage.

42. CGI – ICH
• EP2) The right of communities, groups and, where applicable, individuals to continue the practices,
representations, expressions, knowledge and skills necessary to ensure the viability of the intangible cultural
heritage should be recognized and respected.
• EP3) Mutual respect as well as a respect for and mutual appreciation of intangible cultural heritage,
should prevail in interactions between States and between communities, groups and, where applicable,
individuals.
• EP5) Access of communities, groups and individuals to the instruments, objects, artefacts, cultural and natural
spaces and places of memory whose existence is necessary for expressing the intangible cultural heritage
should be ensured, including in situations of armed conflict. Customary practices governing access to
intangible cultural heritage should be fully respected, even where these may limit broader public access.
• EP6) Each community, group or individual should assess the value of its own intangible cultural
heritage and this intangible cultural heritage should not be subject to external judgements of value or worth.
• EP7) The communities, groups and individuals who create intangible cultural heritage should benefit
from the protection of the moral and material interests resulting from such heritage, and particularly from its
use, research, documentation, promotion or adaptation by members of the communities or others.

43. CGI – ICH
• EP10) Communities, groups and, where applicable, individuals should
play a significant role in determining what constitutes threats to their
intangible cultural heritage including
- the decontextualization,
- commodification and
- misrepresentation of it
- and in deciding how to prevent and mitigate such threats.
• EP12) The safeguarding of intangible cultural heritage is of general
interest to humanity and should therefore be undertaken through co
operation among bilateral, sub regional, regional and international parties;
nevertheless, communities, groups and, where applicable, individuals
should never be alienated from their own intangible cultural heritage.

44. CGI-Safeguarding
EP1) Communities, groups and, where applicable, individuals should have
the primary role in safeguarding their own intangible cultural heritage.
EP11) Cultural diversity and the identities of communities, groups and
individuals should be fully respected. In the respect of values recognized
by communities, groups and individuals and sensitivity to cultural norms,
+ specific attention to gender equality, youth involvement and respect for
ethnic identities should be included in the design and implementation of
safeguarding measures.

45. ALL (including CGI) – ICH & CGI
EP9)Communities, groups, local, national and transnational
organizations and individuals should carefully assess the direct and
indirect, short-term and long-term, potential and definitive impact of
any action that may affect the viability of intangible cultural heritage
or the communities who practise it.

46. CGI-ALL ACTORS (that safeguard)
EP4) All interactions with the communities, groups and, where applicable,
individuals who create, safeguard, maintain and transmit intangible cultural
heritage should be characterized by
- transparent collaboration,
- dialogue, -
- negotiation and consultation,
- and contingent upon their free,
• prior,
• sustained and
• informed consent.

47. Between States
EP3)Mutual respect as well as a respect for and mutual appreciation
of intangible cultural heritage, should prevail in interactions
between States and between communities, groups and, where
applicable, individuals.

49. Zie 2030-2045