John E. Graykowski
Maritime Industry Consultants
July 18, 2013
 Cost advantages
 Emissions Reductions
 Abundant Domestic Supplies
 Consistent with National Energy Policy Objectives
LNG has the potential to transform the maritime and
transportation industries!
2Maritime Industry Consultants
 Domestic supplies of natural gas will continue to increase.
 LNG will remain less costly as transportation fuel compared with
ultra-low sulfur diesel.
 Environmental regulations of mobile source emissions will
increase, particularly in the maritime industry.
 Marine and domestic transportation industries will continue
movement to LNG; creating high volume potential market for
domestic gas.
 International maritime operators will acquire LNG-fuel
capabilities and expect U.S. supplies to be available.
LNG/CNG will become common marine/transportation fuel in
next five years.
Maritime Industry Consultants 3
 Chicken and egg” problem; e.g. no available infrastructure to
support/signal investment in LNG conversion or new equipment; and
no certain demand to justify LNG infrastructure investment.
 Lack of clear, uniform federal regulatory structures on siting,
permitting, operations of small-scale LNG fuel terminals.
 Local permitting required; opportunities for intervention by
environmental community; NIMBY
 Lack of familiarity, understanding, and relationships between
marine/transportation industries and gas distribution industry;
incompatible fuel pricing and purchasing models.
A catalyst is needed to provide credible signal to marine and
transportation industries and federal agencies that LNG infrastructure
will be available to the marine and transportation industries.
Maritime Industry Consultants 4
 Ports will be at center of LNG activity in marine industry and platform
for expansion to expansion to ferries, trucks, port infrastructure, etc.
 Ports control property, have role in siting, permitting, cost and
operations of an LNG marine fuel terminal.
 Ports have interest in working with regulatory agencies to ensure safe
operations. Goal: uniform safety and operational procedures for all
LNG marine fuel terminals in the United States.
 Ports in best position to work with marine operators and gas suppliers
to build broad public support for LNG in transportation industries and
facilitate expansion of LNG/CNG use in and around port areas.
Ports can serve as the “anchor” for broad deployment of LNG
throughout United States!
Maritime Industry Consultants 5
 Significant and near term emissions reductions in port
areas.
 Ports viewed as leaders in “Green” initiative and
leading expansion of domestic use of domestic natural
gas.
 LNG infrastructure investment creates new market and
employment opportunities.
 “First mover” advantages created for ports that lead
LNG effort; will be in position to compete for
international liner vessels as global LNG conversion
occurs.
Maritime Industry Consultants 6
Federal,
State,
Local
Regulatory
Marine
Operators
Shipyards
PORTS Marketing
and public
relations
Gas
Supply
Interstate
and local
trucking,
Transit
Rail
7Maritime Industry Consultants
 USCG 33 CFR Part 127 “Waterfront facilities handling
liquefied natural gas and liquefied hazardous gas”
 PHMSA 49 CFR Part 193 “Liquefied Natural Gas Facilities:
Federal Safety Standards”
 NFPA 59A NFPA 59A: Standard for the Production, Storage,
and Handling of Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG)
 FERC Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act (15 USC § 717 et
seq.).
Maritime Industry Consultants 8
 Existing regulations aimed at large import/export facilities
NOT small scale marine terminals
 Regulations conflict or are silent on marine fuel terminals
 Application of current regulations has potential of increasing
cost and regulatory burdens to point of infeasibility
 Terminal property limitations
Maritime Industry Consultants 9
10
Import/Export LNG Shoreside Plant
Scale 2 – 3 mtpa 0.2 - 0.4 mtpa
Siting 100’s of acres 10’s of acres
Ship size 87,000 – 200,000 m3 2,000 – 10,000 m3
LNG Flow Rate 12,000 – 14,000 m3/hour 300 – 600 m3/hour
Proposed Corpus Christi LNG Imp./Exp
600+ acres
Notional LNG Bunker
facility
+/- 30 acres
33 CFR 127.001 Subparts A and B of this part apply to the
marine transfer area for LNG of each new waterfront facility
handling LNG and to new construction in the marine transfer
area for LNG of each existing waterfront facility handling LNG
§ 127.005 Waterfront facility handling LHG means any
structure on, in, or under the navigable waters of the United
States, or any structure on land or any area on shore immediately
adjacent to such waters, used or capable of being used to transfer
liquefied hazardous gas, in bulk, to or from a vessel.
Part 127.009 The Coast Guard is authorized by law to establish
water or waterfront safety zones, or other measures for limited,
controlled or conditional access and activity, when necessary for
the protection of any vessel, structure, waters or shore area.

Maritime Industry Consultants 11
49 CFR 193.2001 This part does not apply to:
In the case of a marine cargo transfer system and associated
facilities, any matter other than siting pertaining to the system or
facilities between the marine vessel and the last manifold (or in
the absence of a manifold, the last valve) located immediately
before a storage tank.
§ 193.2007 Definitions.
Waterfront LNG plant means an LNG plant with docks,
wharves, piers, or other structures in, on, or immediately
adjacent to the navigable waters of the United States and any
shore area immediately adjacent to those waters to which vessels
may be secured and at which LNG cargo operations may be
conducted.
Maritime Industry Consultants 12
 Part 127, “LNG loading flanges must be located at least
300 meters from “each bridge crossing on a navigable
waterway.”
 NFPA 59A, “a pier or dock … shall be located so that any
marine vessel being loaded or unloaded is at least 30
meters from any bridge crossing a navigable waterway.
The loading or unloading manifold shall be at least 61
meters from such a bridge.
 NFPA 59A, “General cargo, other than ships’ stores for the
LNG tank vessel, shall not be handled over a pier or dock
within 30 meters of the point of transfer connection while
LNG or flammable fluids are being transferred through
piping systems.”
Maritime Industry Consultants 13
 LNG is new to transportation industries, government and
country.
 Opportunity to create public policies which:
◦ Provide uniform regulatory certainty
◦ Encourage development of LNG as a transportation fuel
◦ Provide incentives to industry for rapid expansion of
LNG infrastructure and uses of LNG
LNG is coming to the transportation industry for
reasons of cost, abundant supplies and environmental
compliance. The ports can and should play a central
role in this development.
Maritime Industry Consultants 14
 Need genuine public/private partnership among all
stakeholders
 Led by transportation industries, gas suppliers and ports
 Need clear policy commitment and action from
Administration and Congress to support LNG/CNG as
preferred transportation fuel.
Maritime Industry Consultants 15
John E. Graykowski
Maritime Industry Consultants
JohnG@maritimeconsults.com
321.394.5099
Maritime Industry Consultants 16

Trb.lng challenges.graykowski

  • 1.
    John E. Graykowski MaritimeIndustry Consultants July 18, 2013
  • 2.
     Cost advantages Emissions Reductions  Abundant Domestic Supplies  Consistent with National Energy Policy Objectives LNG has the potential to transform the maritime and transportation industries! 2Maritime Industry Consultants
  • 3.
     Domestic suppliesof natural gas will continue to increase.  LNG will remain less costly as transportation fuel compared with ultra-low sulfur diesel.  Environmental regulations of mobile source emissions will increase, particularly in the maritime industry.  Marine and domestic transportation industries will continue movement to LNG; creating high volume potential market for domestic gas.  International maritime operators will acquire LNG-fuel capabilities and expect U.S. supplies to be available. LNG/CNG will become common marine/transportation fuel in next five years. Maritime Industry Consultants 3
  • 4.
     Chicken andegg” problem; e.g. no available infrastructure to support/signal investment in LNG conversion or new equipment; and no certain demand to justify LNG infrastructure investment.  Lack of clear, uniform federal regulatory structures on siting, permitting, operations of small-scale LNG fuel terminals.  Local permitting required; opportunities for intervention by environmental community; NIMBY  Lack of familiarity, understanding, and relationships between marine/transportation industries and gas distribution industry; incompatible fuel pricing and purchasing models. A catalyst is needed to provide credible signal to marine and transportation industries and federal agencies that LNG infrastructure will be available to the marine and transportation industries. Maritime Industry Consultants 4
  • 5.
     Ports willbe at center of LNG activity in marine industry and platform for expansion to expansion to ferries, trucks, port infrastructure, etc.  Ports control property, have role in siting, permitting, cost and operations of an LNG marine fuel terminal.  Ports have interest in working with regulatory agencies to ensure safe operations. Goal: uniform safety and operational procedures for all LNG marine fuel terminals in the United States.  Ports in best position to work with marine operators and gas suppliers to build broad public support for LNG in transportation industries and facilitate expansion of LNG/CNG use in and around port areas. Ports can serve as the “anchor” for broad deployment of LNG throughout United States! Maritime Industry Consultants 5
  • 6.
     Significant andnear term emissions reductions in port areas.  Ports viewed as leaders in “Green” initiative and leading expansion of domestic use of domestic natural gas.  LNG infrastructure investment creates new market and employment opportunities.  “First mover” advantages created for ports that lead LNG effort; will be in position to compete for international liner vessels as global LNG conversion occurs. Maritime Industry Consultants 6
  • 7.
  • 8.
     USCG 33CFR Part 127 “Waterfront facilities handling liquefied natural gas and liquefied hazardous gas”  PHMSA 49 CFR Part 193 “Liquefied Natural Gas Facilities: Federal Safety Standards”  NFPA 59A NFPA 59A: Standard for the Production, Storage, and Handling of Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG)  FERC Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act (15 USC § 717 et seq.). Maritime Industry Consultants 8
  • 9.
     Existing regulationsaimed at large import/export facilities NOT small scale marine terminals  Regulations conflict or are silent on marine fuel terminals  Application of current regulations has potential of increasing cost and regulatory burdens to point of infeasibility  Terminal property limitations Maritime Industry Consultants 9
  • 10.
    10 Import/Export LNG ShoresidePlant Scale 2 – 3 mtpa 0.2 - 0.4 mtpa Siting 100’s of acres 10’s of acres Ship size 87,000 – 200,000 m3 2,000 – 10,000 m3 LNG Flow Rate 12,000 – 14,000 m3/hour 300 – 600 m3/hour Proposed Corpus Christi LNG Imp./Exp 600+ acres Notional LNG Bunker facility +/- 30 acres
  • 11.
    33 CFR 127.001Subparts A and B of this part apply to the marine transfer area for LNG of each new waterfront facility handling LNG and to new construction in the marine transfer area for LNG of each existing waterfront facility handling LNG § 127.005 Waterfront facility handling LHG means any structure on, in, or under the navigable waters of the United States, or any structure on land or any area on shore immediately adjacent to such waters, used or capable of being used to transfer liquefied hazardous gas, in bulk, to or from a vessel. Part 127.009 The Coast Guard is authorized by law to establish water or waterfront safety zones, or other measures for limited, controlled or conditional access and activity, when necessary for the protection of any vessel, structure, waters or shore area.  Maritime Industry Consultants 11
  • 12.
    49 CFR 193.2001This part does not apply to: In the case of a marine cargo transfer system and associated facilities, any matter other than siting pertaining to the system or facilities between the marine vessel and the last manifold (or in the absence of a manifold, the last valve) located immediately before a storage tank. § 193.2007 Definitions. Waterfront LNG plant means an LNG plant with docks, wharves, piers, or other structures in, on, or immediately adjacent to the navigable waters of the United States and any shore area immediately adjacent to those waters to which vessels may be secured and at which LNG cargo operations may be conducted. Maritime Industry Consultants 12
  • 13.
     Part 127,“LNG loading flanges must be located at least 300 meters from “each bridge crossing on a navigable waterway.”  NFPA 59A, “a pier or dock … shall be located so that any marine vessel being loaded or unloaded is at least 30 meters from any bridge crossing a navigable waterway. The loading or unloading manifold shall be at least 61 meters from such a bridge.  NFPA 59A, “General cargo, other than ships’ stores for the LNG tank vessel, shall not be handled over a pier or dock within 30 meters of the point of transfer connection while LNG or flammable fluids are being transferred through piping systems.” Maritime Industry Consultants 13
  • 14.
     LNG isnew to transportation industries, government and country.  Opportunity to create public policies which: ◦ Provide uniform regulatory certainty ◦ Encourage development of LNG as a transportation fuel ◦ Provide incentives to industry for rapid expansion of LNG infrastructure and uses of LNG LNG is coming to the transportation industry for reasons of cost, abundant supplies and environmental compliance. The ports can and should play a central role in this development. Maritime Industry Consultants 14
  • 15.
     Need genuinepublic/private partnership among all stakeholders  Led by transportation industries, gas suppliers and ports  Need clear policy commitment and action from Administration and Congress to support LNG/CNG as preferred transportation fuel. Maritime Industry Consultants 15
  • 16.
    John E. Graykowski MaritimeIndustry Consultants JohnG@maritimeconsults.com 321.394.5099 Maritime Industry Consultants 16