Top Off Your Perfect Blend
        with TOPR:
    The Teaching Online
   Pedagogical Repository
Dr. Kelvin Thompson
Dr. Linda Futch
Dr. Baiyun Chen

University of Central Florida
Agenda

Big Picture
Details
Your Involvement
Closing


             http://bit.ly/blend12_topr
What Is It?

a peer-reviewed resource to support the curation of
effective pedagogical practices in online and blended
courses

individual entries include:
 • strategy description drawn from the pedagogical
   practice of online/blended teaching faculty
 • artifacts depicting the strategy from actual courses
 • alignment with cited findings from research or
   professional practice literature

All released for reuse/remix under Creative
Commons
Editorial Board
•   Alec Couros, Associate Professor, University of Regina
•   Charles D. Dziuban, Director, Research Initiative for Teaching Effectiveness (RITE),
    University of Central Florida
•   David Wicks, Director of Instructional Technology, Assistant Professor, Seattle Pacific
    University
•   Fred Stielow, Vice President, Dean of Libraries & Course Materials, American Public
    University System
•   Karen Swan, Stukel Professor of Educational Leadership, University of Illinois
    Springfield
•   Mark A. Laumakis, Lecturer, Department of Psychology Faculty in Residence,
    Instructional Technology Services, San Diego State University
•   Melody A. Bowdon, Director, Karen L. Smith Faculty Center for Teaching and
    Learning, Associate Professor of Writing and Rhetoric, University of Central Florida
•   Norman Vaughan, Professor, Education & Schooling Faculty of Teaching & Learning,
    Mount Royal University
•   Susan Wegmann, Associate Professor, Director of Programs and Research, Morgridge
    International Reading Center (MIRC), University of Central Florida
•   Tana Monaco, Consultant
•   Veronica Diaz, Associate Director, EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative, EDUCAUSE
Demo: Finding Strategies
"Bigger than a Breadbox"

Getting the granularity right

Pedagogical practice is
• Not a theory
• Not an instructional model
• Not a tool
• Not a broad, sweeping concept
• Not "here's what i did"

IS an impactful, replicable teaching practice/strategy
described, anchored to literature, illustrated in examples,
and connected to other practices via keyword tags
Demo: Contribution Form
Isn't This Like MERLOT?

MERLOT is primarily a collection of materials.
• "learning exercises" are lessons associated with materials
• eLIXR is a set of holistic faculty case studies on big
  themes

TOPR is a collection of teaching strategies
 • artifacts are illustrative
 • faculty testimonials are highly contextualized
Conceptual Framework

Strategy Description
• 1-2 paragraphs
• "blogs are not a practice but implementing public blogs for
   reflective writing in a community of practice might be"

A
Artifacts
 • Preferably image/files uploaded into the repository
 • External links/images acceptable

Scholarly References
• Research articles are great
• "Professional practice literature" (journals, blogs,
  podcasts)
Theoretical Underpinning

Source of possible tags
• Theory
• Instructional Model
• Concept
• Sub-Concept
• Tool

Loosely suggested tags (existing "categories")
Development Process

Entries
• Anyone can contribute an idea
• Any registered user can create a new entry
• Many "stubs" (Wikipedia) in backstage Draft area

Editing
• Any registered user can edit or add additional material
• Managing editors responsible for "keeping on the rails"
    o Edit with eye for consistency, conceptual framework
    o Possibly move an entry backstage if "just not ready"
    o May coach contributor(s)


Peer Review
New Scholarship Issues

"Perpetual beta" + peer review = strange bedfellows/mutation
 • Scholarly rigor in entries
 • Peer review process for improvement/validation
 • Wiki for on-going improvements/updates

Intellectual property complications
 • Creative Commons licensing for "remixing"
 • Some faculty (and administrators) not sure about CC
 • Many individuals uncertain how to operationalize CC
Making It Work
Few, simple non-negotiables (conceptual framework)

Editorial Board
• Promoting TOPR
• Feedback on processes
• Recruit peer reviewers

Peer review process to follow
Issue: entry is peer-reviewed but on an ever-changing wiki
Possible answer: "oldid" function (used currently in citation)

Perhaps a "peer reviewed" graphic and a statement like:
"a version of this entry was peer reviewed previously. see
that version."Allows reader to compare versions for herself
Current Status

Emerging from beta
New entries being made/edited
Casual submissions and regular contributors welcomed
Initial editorial board meeting being scheduled
Peer review process in the works
Your Involvement
Your Thoughts?
• What value (if any) do you seen in TOPR as a whole for
  your institution?

• Can you envision yourself or colleagues contributing to
  TOPR?

• How might you adapt ideas from TOPR for your own
  teaching?

• Do you see yourself contributing ideas?
Get Involved

Have the germ of an idea or a fully fleshed out entry you wish
to share?
 • Contribution Form: http://bit.ly/topr_contributionform


Do you wish to get more involved in contributing and editing
ideas on a fairly frequent basis?
 • Send email to topr@ucf.edu to request a login to TOPR


Want to become a peer reviewer for TOPR?
• Send email to topr@ucf.edu for follow-up
Questions and Answers
Contact Us
             http://topr.online.ucf.edu
Dr. Kelvin Thompson   kelvin@ucf.edu
Dr. Linda Futch       linda.futch@ucf.edu
Dr. Baiyun Chen       baiyun.chen@ucf.edu




         http://bit.ly/blend12_topr

Top Off Your Perfect Blend with TOPR: The Teaching Online Pedagogical Repository

  • 1.
    Top Off YourPerfect Blend with TOPR: The Teaching Online Pedagogical Repository Dr. Kelvin Thompson Dr. Linda Futch Dr. Baiyun Chen University of Central Florida
  • 2.
  • 3.
    What Is It? apeer-reviewed resource to support the curation of effective pedagogical practices in online and blended courses individual entries include: • strategy description drawn from the pedagogical practice of online/blended teaching faculty • artifacts depicting the strategy from actual courses • alignment with cited findings from research or professional practice literature All released for reuse/remix under Creative Commons
  • 4.
    Editorial Board • Alec Couros, Associate Professor, University of Regina • Charles D. Dziuban, Director, Research Initiative for Teaching Effectiveness (RITE), University of Central Florida • David Wicks, Director of Instructional Technology, Assistant Professor, Seattle Pacific University • Fred Stielow, Vice President, Dean of Libraries & Course Materials, American Public University System • Karen Swan, Stukel Professor of Educational Leadership, University of Illinois Springfield • Mark A. Laumakis, Lecturer, Department of Psychology Faculty in Residence, Instructional Technology Services, San Diego State University • Melody A. Bowdon, Director, Karen L. Smith Faculty Center for Teaching and Learning, Associate Professor of Writing and Rhetoric, University of Central Florida • Norman Vaughan, Professor, Education & Schooling Faculty of Teaching & Learning, Mount Royal University • Susan Wegmann, Associate Professor, Director of Programs and Research, Morgridge International Reading Center (MIRC), University of Central Florida • Tana Monaco, Consultant • Veronica Diaz, Associate Director, EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative, EDUCAUSE
  • 9.
  • 10.
    "Bigger than aBreadbox" Getting the granularity right Pedagogical practice is • Not a theory • Not an instructional model • Not a tool • Not a broad, sweeping concept • Not "here's what i did" IS an impactful, replicable teaching practice/strategy described, anchored to literature, illustrated in examples, and connected to other practices via keyword tags
  • 11.
  • 12.
    Isn't This LikeMERLOT? MERLOT is primarily a collection of materials. • "learning exercises" are lessons associated with materials • eLIXR is a set of holistic faculty case studies on big themes TOPR is a collection of teaching strategies • artifacts are illustrative • faculty testimonials are highly contextualized
  • 13.
    Conceptual Framework Strategy Description •1-2 paragraphs • "blogs are not a practice but implementing public blogs for reflective writing in a community of practice might be" A Artifacts • Preferably image/files uploaded into the repository • External links/images acceptable Scholarly References • Research articles are great • "Professional practice literature" (journals, blogs, podcasts)
  • 14.
    Theoretical Underpinning Source ofpossible tags • Theory • Instructional Model • Concept • Sub-Concept • Tool Loosely suggested tags (existing "categories")
  • 15.
    Development Process Entries • Anyonecan contribute an idea • Any registered user can create a new entry • Many "stubs" (Wikipedia) in backstage Draft area Editing • Any registered user can edit or add additional material • Managing editors responsible for "keeping on the rails" o Edit with eye for consistency, conceptual framework o Possibly move an entry backstage if "just not ready" o May coach contributor(s) Peer Review
  • 16.
    New Scholarship Issues "Perpetualbeta" + peer review = strange bedfellows/mutation • Scholarly rigor in entries • Peer review process for improvement/validation • Wiki for on-going improvements/updates Intellectual property complications • Creative Commons licensing for "remixing" • Some faculty (and administrators) not sure about CC • Many individuals uncertain how to operationalize CC
  • 17.
    Making It Work Few,simple non-negotiables (conceptual framework) Editorial Board • Promoting TOPR • Feedback on processes • Recruit peer reviewers Peer review process to follow Issue: entry is peer-reviewed but on an ever-changing wiki Possible answer: "oldid" function (used currently in citation) Perhaps a "peer reviewed" graphic and a statement like: "a version of this entry was peer reviewed previously. see that version."Allows reader to compare versions for herself
  • 18.
    Current Status Emerging frombeta New entries being made/edited Casual submissions and regular contributors welcomed Initial editorial board meeting being scheduled Peer review process in the works
  • 19.
  • 20.
    Your Thoughts? • Whatvalue (if any) do you seen in TOPR as a whole for your institution? • Can you envision yourself or colleagues contributing to TOPR? • How might you adapt ideas from TOPR for your own teaching? • Do you see yourself contributing ideas?
  • 21.
    Get Involved Have thegerm of an idea or a fully fleshed out entry you wish to share? • Contribution Form: http://bit.ly/topr_contributionform Do you wish to get more involved in contributing and editing ideas on a fairly frequent basis? • Send email to topr@ucf.edu to request a login to TOPR Want to become a peer reviewer for TOPR? • Send email to topr@ucf.edu for follow-up
  • 22.
  • 23.
    Contact Us http://topr.online.ucf.edu Dr. Kelvin Thompson kelvin@ucf.edu Dr. Linda Futch linda.futch@ucf.edu Dr. Baiyun Chen baiyun.chen@ucf.edu http://bit.ly/blend12_topr

Editor's Notes

  • #3 Linda Answer questions as we go Time for questions at end as well
  • #4 Linda
  • #5 Kelvin
  • #6 LInda Review the sample TOPR entry individually. Guide them through parts What do you like about the entry? What improvements might you make?
  • #10 Linda – introduce video
  • #11 Kelvin
  • #12 Baiyun
  • #13 Linda
  • #14 Kelvin
  • #15 Kelvin
  • #16 Linda Where are we today! Brief review of tool Mix of dynamic aspects of web 2.0 tools add in peer-review Web 2.0 View Contribute Stages of development Peer Review
  • #17 Kelvin
  • #18 Kelvin
  • #19 Kelvin
  • #20 Kelvin
  • #21 Kelvin
  • #22 Kelvin