Think Tanks External Context_R4D
•
1 like•894 views
The document summarizes research on the external context factors that influence think tank decision-making and performance. It outlines the main research questions, which examine how context is defined and measured, how it affects think tanks, and how think tanks respond to context. Four main external context factors are identified: political and economic context, donors, intellectual context, and civil society context. The research involved interviews, literature reviews, surveys, and case studies to explore these relationships. Context was operationalized using quantitative indicators that are widely available, consistent, and understandable. Preliminary results found few significant relationships between context measures and think tank outcomes, but a negative correlation between GDP and levels of policy discussion, implementation, and adoption.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Download to read offline
Recommended
A case study of community engagement research to promote_cped
This document summarizes a case study of community engagement research conducted in Nigeria's Niger Delta region to promote peace among five communities. The research team conducted surveys and focus groups with representatives from the communities. The findings showed different types of conflicts affecting the communities. As a result of presentations to community stakeholders, a Peace Committee was formed with rotating leadership among the communities. The community engagement model was then presented to local government and other organizations, some of which adopted aspects of the approach. The summary highlights ethical challenges including ensuring community participation, addressing power imbalances, and maintaining methodological rigor while involving communities in the research process.
Think Tanks and Elections_an_Opportunity for Research Outreach and Influence
This document outlines a panel discussion on initiatives by think tanks to leverage research and influence electoral processes. It discusses two main types of interventions: research to influence elections and research on elections. Key components discussed include research, outreach events, dissemination, and debates. Examples from Latin America (CIES, Grupo FARO), Africa (IAE Ghana), and Asia (CSDS India) demonstrate different approaches think tanks have taken, including producing policy papers, organizing debates between candidates, and conducting long-term research on voting trends. Challenges and lessons learned emphasize the importance of context, building trust, partnerships, and funding strategies. The panel explores how think tanks can best position research to impact elections and policymaking.
Beyond Voice_Action Learning Case Study_CEPA
This document describes an action research process used by the Active Citizens' Development Network (ACDN) in Sri Lanka to engage communities in research. ACDN worked with the Center for Poverty Analysis (CEPA) to collaboratively formulate research questions, have communities gather and analyze data, and ensure research quality. The process included organizing existing community data, storytelling workshops to construct narratives for preliminary analysis, and validating findings through additional data and discussions. The value of this approach was that it enabled communities to generate knowledge to address their own problems, demystified research, democratized knowledge production, and blurred roles between researchers and communities.
Impact Evaluation for Policy Making_Promoting Uptake of Impact Evaluation Fin...
3ie funds high-quality impact evaluations that are policy-relevant and useful for decision-making. 3ie has learned that researchers must engage stakeholders early and throughout the process to increase the likelihood of findings being taken up and used. 3ie now requires researchers to develop policy influence plans and engage in ongoing discussions with implementing agencies to ensure studies answer relevant questions and produce feasible recommendations. While impact evaluations can provide compelling evidence, uptake is a political process and single studies rarely drive major policy changes.
Impact Evaluation for Policy Making Learning about Rigorous Methods to Inform...
This document provides an agenda for a session on impact evaluations (IEs) at a think tank conference in Istanbul. The objectives are to raise awareness of IEs among think tanks, share resources for IE work, and learn what capacity think tanks want to develop. The session will include presentations on designing and implementing policy-relevant IEs, as well as a discussion of think tanks' interests in IE capacity development to inform future strategy. Presenters will discuss IE methodology and promoting uptake of findings, with discussants providing comments. The goal is to help think tanks produce high-quality evidence to inform policymaking through rigorous impact evaluations.
The Making of Aditi_A Publisher’s Point of View_CSTEP
The document summarizes the publisher's perspective on Aditi, an ongoing publication platform for think tanks. It discusses how Aditi was conceived to discuss topics of common interest, with objectives like strengthening policy research. The first phase included publishing articles on topics like funding and research capacity. Feedback was positive and encouraged continuing publication. For phase two, CSTEP decided to publish more issues focusing on broad themes and including more sections. It has allowed expanding to a global audience by initiating contacts with think tanks in other regions and negotiating cross-postings. The publisher takes a planned approach to initiating the project, designing, reviewing, and publishing each issue to achieve the goals of highlighting policy research.
Impact Evaluation Step by Step Evaluating the Impact of Formality_GRADE
This document summarizes a study that evaluated the impact of formality on micro enterprise performance in Lima, Peru. The study used an encouragement design where 300 micro enterprises were randomly selected to receive an incentive to obtain an operating license, while the remaining 304 firms served as the comparison group. Surveys were conducted with all firms at baseline and over two and a half years to measure outcomes. The results found that operating with a municipal license had no statistically significant effect on firm performance measures like revenues, profits, employment levels, or access to credit. This suggests that simply providing licenses may not be enough to improve firm performance, and that formalization programs require a broader scope. The findings provide relevant evidence for policymakers on the limited impacts of
Community Engaged Research_ACODE
This document summarizes a presentation given by Dr. Arthur Bainomugisha on community-engaged research and the Local Government Councils Score Card Initiative (LGCSCI) in Uganda. It provides background on ACODE, the think tank that developed the LGCSCI to address deficiencies in Uganda's decentralization. The LGCSCI assesses local government councils and leaders to increase accountability. It is based on the theory that by monitoring performance and sharing information with citizens, they will demand more accountability from local leaders, triggering improved service delivery and governance. The methodology involves developing scorecards, conducting research, and disseminating results. Achievements to date include improved council debates, increased civic awareness and demand for the initiative,
Recommended
A case study of community engagement research to promote_cped
This document summarizes a case study of community engagement research conducted in Nigeria's Niger Delta region to promote peace among five communities. The research team conducted surveys and focus groups with representatives from the communities. The findings showed different types of conflicts affecting the communities. As a result of presentations to community stakeholders, a Peace Committee was formed with rotating leadership among the communities. The community engagement model was then presented to local government and other organizations, some of which adopted aspects of the approach. The summary highlights ethical challenges including ensuring community participation, addressing power imbalances, and maintaining methodological rigor while involving communities in the research process.
Think Tanks and Elections_an_Opportunity for Research Outreach and Influence
This document outlines a panel discussion on initiatives by think tanks to leverage research and influence electoral processes. It discusses two main types of interventions: research to influence elections and research on elections. Key components discussed include research, outreach events, dissemination, and debates. Examples from Latin America (CIES, Grupo FARO), Africa (IAE Ghana), and Asia (CSDS India) demonstrate different approaches think tanks have taken, including producing policy papers, organizing debates between candidates, and conducting long-term research on voting trends. Challenges and lessons learned emphasize the importance of context, building trust, partnerships, and funding strategies. The panel explores how think tanks can best position research to impact elections and policymaking.
Beyond Voice_Action Learning Case Study_CEPA
This document describes an action research process used by the Active Citizens' Development Network (ACDN) in Sri Lanka to engage communities in research. ACDN worked with the Center for Poverty Analysis (CEPA) to collaboratively formulate research questions, have communities gather and analyze data, and ensure research quality. The process included organizing existing community data, storytelling workshops to construct narratives for preliminary analysis, and validating findings through additional data and discussions. The value of this approach was that it enabled communities to generate knowledge to address their own problems, demystified research, democratized knowledge production, and blurred roles between researchers and communities.
Impact Evaluation for Policy Making_Promoting Uptake of Impact Evaluation Fin...
3ie funds high-quality impact evaluations that are policy-relevant and useful for decision-making. 3ie has learned that researchers must engage stakeholders early and throughout the process to increase the likelihood of findings being taken up and used. 3ie now requires researchers to develop policy influence plans and engage in ongoing discussions with implementing agencies to ensure studies answer relevant questions and produce feasible recommendations. While impact evaluations can provide compelling evidence, uptake is a political process and single studies rarely drive major policy changes.
Impact Evaluation for Policy Making Learning about Rigorous Methods to Inform...
This document provides an agenda for a session on impact evaluations (IEs) at a think tank conference in Istanbul. The objectives are to raise awareness of IEs among think tanks, share resources for IE work, and learn what capacity think tanks want to develop. The session will include presentations on designing and implementing policy-relevant IEs, as well as a discussion of think tanks' interests in IE capacity development to inform future strategy. Presenters will discuss IE methodology and promoting uptake of findings, with discussants providing comments. The goal is to help think tanks produce high-quality evidence to inform policymaking through rigorous impact evaluations.
The Making of Aditi_A Publisher’s Point of View_CSTEP
The document summarizes the publisher's perspective on Aditi, an ongoing publication platform for think tanks. It discusses how Aditi was conceived to discuss topics of common interest, with objectives like strengthening policy research. The first phase included publishing articles on topics like funding and research capacity. Feedback was positive and encouraged continuing publication. For phase two, CSTEP decided to publish more issues focusing on broad themes and including more sections. It has allowed expanding to a global audience by initiating contacts with think tanks in other regions and negotiating cross-postings. The publisher takes a planned approach to initiating the project, designing, reviewing, and publishing each issue to achieve the goals of highlighting policy research.
Impact Evaluation Step by Step Evaluating the Impact of Formality_GRADE
This document summarizes a study that evaluated the impact of formality on micro enterprise performance in Lima, Peru. The study used an encouragement design where 300 micro enterprises were randomly selected to receive an incentive to obtain an operating license, while the remaining 304 firms served as the comparison group. Surveys were conducted with all firms at baseline and over two and a half years to measure outcomes. The results found that operating with a municipal license had no statistically significant effect on firm performance measures like revenues, profits, employment levels, or access to credit. This suggests that simply providing licenses may not be enough to improve firm performance, and that formalization programs require a broader scope. The findings provide relevant evidence for policymakers on the limited impacts of
Community Engaged Research_ACODE
This document summarizes a presentation given by Dr. Arthur Bainomugisha on community-engaged research and the Local Government Councils Score Card Initiative (LGCSCI) in Uganda. It provides background on ACODE, the think tank that developed the LGCSCI to address deficiencies in Uganda's decentralization. The LGCSCI assesses local government councils and leaders to increase accountability. It is based on the theory that by monitoring performance and sharing information with citizens, they will demand more accountability from local leaders, triggering improved service delivery and governance. The methodology involves developing scorecards, conducting research, and disseminating results. Achievements to date include improved council debates, increased civic awareness and demand for the initiative,
Case Study for Research Ethics Social Audit for Public Service Delivery_PACc
The document summarizes a citizen report card study conducted in Karnataka, India to assess the quality of eight public services. Nearly 3000 users across representative districts were surveyed using household interviews and exit interviews. The study was funded by the State Planning Board of Karnataka and aimed to systematically collect user feedback to help government departments identify areas for improvement. Key aspects included maintaining impartiality in sample selection and methodology, sharing findings with stakeholders for accountability, and ensuring transparency through public dissemination of the final report. However, the study did not provide feedback to the community as it lacked resources and tight timelines to "close the loop" with users.
Roma for seval
The document discusses the RAPID Outcome Mapping Approach for influencing policy change. It provides an overview of the typical policy process and different approaches for influencing policy, such as through cooperation, evidence-based advocacy, or activism. It then outlines the six steps of the RAPID Outcome Mapping Approach: 1) start by defining policy objectives, 2) use tools like the AIIM matrix to map actors and influence, 3) conduct a force field analysis to assess positive and negative forces, 4) create a SWOT analysis to evaluate strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats, 5) identify appropriate strategies like developing networks or conducting research, and 6) monitor and evaluate progress using tools like outcome mapping.
Research uptake: DFID learning from experience
A presentation by Rachel Hinton as part of the Cohort Research for Programme and Policy panel discussion at the International Symposium on Cohort and Longitudinal Studies in Developing Contexts, UNICEF Office of Research - Innocenti, Florence, Italy 13-15 October 2014
ICAR-IFPRI : Policy process and extension policy communications - Suresh Babu
ICAR-IFPRI : Policy process and extension policy communications - Suresh BabuInternational Food Policy Research Institute- South Asia Office
ICAR-IFPRI: Methodologies in Agricultural Extension Research capacity development program from September 21-24, 2015 in New Delhi Growing Conversations Launch Presentation
Growing Conversations is a process to improve community planning in Toronto through a better engagement process. This presentation was made at the project launch on June 24, 2014, and serves as an introduction to the project objectives, elements, and timeline.
Growing Conversations Launch Presentation
The document outlines a study to improve community engagement in Toronto's planning process. The study has five objectives: 1) understand current engagement strengths and weaknesses, 2) explore new engagement models, 3) implement community advisory groups, 4) broaden participation among key groups, and 5) improve feedback quality. The study will develop partnerships, an ethnic media strategy, a youth engagement strategy, and open data guidelines. Public outreach will occur through online consultation, roundtables, and workshops over the summer and fall to identify opportunities and principles for effective engagement.
Acacia Research and Learning Forum Tutorial 2
The document outlines the agenda and activities of a policy engagement tutorial held in Dakar, Senegal. It includes:
- Storytelling exercises where participants shared experiences engaging with policy processes
- Identification of 6 key lessons for effective policy engagement based on collective experiences
- Presentation of frameworks for analyzing the political context, evidence, and links between policy and research communities when influencing policy
- Discussion of tools for strategic policy engagement including the Alignment, Interest and Influence Matrix to map stakeholders and prioritize targets.
A strategic approach to policy engagement for research organisations
This is the presentation delivered as part of a two day workshop held in Nepal in 2014 aimed at communications professionals or the point person for communication within fifteen South Asian think tanks. Participants explored how they could adopt a systematic approach to planning research or knowledge outputs for policy engagement and influence. They explored the types of influencing outcomes they are focused on and their individual and institutional capacities to deliver strategic communication and policy engagement work. By the end of the workshop it was hoped that each participating institution would have identified a clear set of steps towards the development of a strategic approach to policy engagement and research communication at an institutional or programmatic level.
This workshop formed part of the IDRC funded Think Tanks Initiative South Asia programme. http://www.idrc.ca/EN/Programs/Social_and_Economic_Policy/Think_Tank_Initiative/Pages/About.aspx
Nhs citizen research workshop
Slides from NHS Citizen Research Workshop convened on the 7th of April 2015 at the University of Westminster to discuss the Research Hub, a brand new element of the NHS Citizen design intended to support wider research and knowledge sharing.
The aim of the workshop was to explore possible research questions and projects and this presentation introduces what NHS Citizen research might look like in its different forms.
Converting research into advocacy from Ilm Ideas on Slide Share
This document provides an overview of a workshop on converting research into advocacy. It includes information on advocacy strategies and formats, case studies, and exercises. Research tools used by grantees are summarized, including interviews, focus groups, and surveys. Key skills for using research for advocacy are identified, such as analyzing situations, identifying targets, and developing advocacy plans. Organizational capacity for research and advocacy is assessed. The purpose and definitions of advocacy are outlined. Steps for advocacy strategy formulation are presented, including selecting issues and understanding stakeholders. The document provides examples of advocacy at different levels from village to national.
Leduc Phipps Poetz: Development of indicators for measurement at each stage o...
Renee Leduc, Program Officer at Canada's NCE Secretariat presents on indicators, reporting and measurement for the NCE program with respect to Knowledge Translation, Commercialization and Socio-Economic benefit to Canadians (otherwise referred to as Knowledge and Technology Exchange and Exploitation KTEE). These slides represent part 1 of a 2 part co-presentation with NeuroDevNet NCE's KT Core. There is an accompanying handout that helps NCEs work through linking goals with outputs, outcomes and relates to the 2nd handout called "anatomy of an indicator" that helps users develop indicators.
Identifying Gender Dimensions In Your Projects Sept17 2008
This document discusses the importance of identifying gender dimensions in projects. It notes that doing so can help reduce poverty, comply with donor requests, and meet reporting requirements. Failing to consider gender can cause projects to miss their objectives or have unintended negative effects. The document provides examples of integrating gender considerations throughout the project cycle, from the initial needs assessment and design to implementation, monitoring, and evaluation.
Working with complexity: Six steps to enhance research
John Young's presentation at the GDN workshop on 'Maximizing the Impact of Agricultural Research in Africa' held in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia in October 2008. In his talk, he outlines how organisations can work within complex policy processes to achieve impact and expands on several tools that can be used as part of this process.
Relationship-based knowledge mobilization: systems-based KMb and consideratio...
The field of Knowledge Translation (KT) needs to consider the importance of risk perception as a key barrier for uptake of research findings. This presentation outlines several domains for risk perception identified as a result of case study/grounded theory methodology research on the restart of two nuclear generating stations in Ontario, Canada. Generalizable results for the field of KT, KMb are presented.
Jody Harris, IFPRI and LCIRAH "Assessing Intersectoral Coordination for Nutri...
Jody Harris, IFPRI and LCIRAH "Assessing Intersectoral Coordination for Nutri...Independent Science and Partnership Council of the CGIAR
Science Forum 2013 (www.scienceforum13.org)
Breakout Session 5 - Policy and Institutional Approached in Nutrition Sensitive Agriculture Role Of Gsc Os In International Development Presentation (K Jutze August 2009)
The document summarizes Kimberley Jutze's 2009 research project on the role of global social change organizations (GSCOs) in international development. The research aimed to understand how GSCOs function and their development activities. It reviewed literature on the emergence of GSCOs and their distinguishing characteristics. Key findings were that GSCOs take an ideological approach, are influenced by stakeholders, and face challenges balancing flexibility with efficiency and interests. The research findings identified effective GSCO functions and interventions like participatory management and grassroots collaborations. Common themes were inclusion, capacity-building, sustainability, and collaboration. It concluded the research supported most literature but showed GSCOs intend systemic change over doing good alone.
Planning for impact: Basic communication strategies
This presentation from Jeff Knezovich of the Overseas Development Institute was given at a workshop held on research packaging at ESRF in Tanzania in August 2008. It was prepared for the Micro-level Perspectives of Growth project currently being undertaken by the University of Dar es Salaam Department of Economics. More information on the project can be found at http://www.esrftz.org/mlpg
FoME Symposium 2015 | Workshop 8: Current Evaluation Practices and Perspectiv...
This presentation was held at the FoME Symposium, Oct. 1-2, 2015 at DW Akademie Bonn. FoME stands for "Forum Medien und Entwicklung". It's the German Forum "Media and Development", a network of institutions and individuals active in the field of media development cooperation.
Find the Symposium’s documentation here: http://fome.info/2015
Power of partnership conference: Presentation: New norms and forms of develop...
Power of partnership conference: Presentation: New norms and forms of develop...The Impact Initiative
Power of partnership conference: Presentation: New norms and forms of development: Brokerage of foreign aid in maternal and child health service development and delivery in Nepal and MalawiWebinar | Gender Equality in National Adaptation Plan (NAP) Processes: Assess...
Webinar | Gender Equality in National Adaptation Plan (NAP) Processes: Assess...International Institute for Sustainable Development
This NAP Global Network event highlighted how to use the Toolkit for a Gender-Responsive Process to Formulate and Implement NAPs to ensure gender equality is considered in the assessment of vulnerabilities and identification of adaptation options.2011 global-go-to-think-tanks-report
This document summarizes the 2011 Global Go To Think Tank Rankings report. It announces the launch of the 2011 rankings and report, which ranks think tanks around the world. It provides statistics on the scope of the ranking process, which involved over 1,500 individuals from 120 countries participating in nominations and rankings across 30 categories. The rankings are based on nominations and evaluations from experts on specific regions and fields. The document outlines the methodology used in the 2011 rankings process and categories included. It acknowledges efforts to improve representations of think tanks from non-G7 countries in the rankings.
Global global think tanks report 2011
This document announces the launch of the 2011 Global Go To Think Tanks Rankings report. It provides an overview of the ranking methodology, which involved nominations and evaluations from over 7,000 think tanks and experts in 182 countries. Key statistics on the scope and participation in the ranking process are highlighted. The rankings are organized into categories evaluating think tanks worldwide, by region, by research area, and for special achievements. The report aims to recognize influential think tanks and improve their capacity through an open and transparent ranking process.
More Related Content
What's hot
Case Study for Research Ethics Social Audit for Public Service Delivery_PACc
The document summarizes a citizen report card study conducted in Karnataka, India to assess the quality of eight public services. Nearly 3000 users across representative districts were surveyed using household interviews and exit interviews. The study was funded by the State Planning Board of Karnataka and aimed to systematically collect user feedback to help government departments identify areas for improvement. Key aspects included maintaining impartiality in sample selection and methodology, sharing findings with stakeholders for accountability, and ensuring transparency through public dissemination of the final report. However, the study did not provide feedback to the community as it lacked resources and tight timelines to "close the loop" with users.
Roma for seval
The document discusses the RAPID Outcome Mapping Approach for influencing policy change. It provides an overview of the typical policy process and different approaches for influencing policy, such as through cooperation, evidence-based advocacy, or activism. It then outlines the six steps of the RAPID Outcome Mapping Approach: 1) start by defining policy objectives, 2) use tools like the AIIM matrix to map actors and influence, 3) conduct a force field analysis to assess positive and negative forces, 4) create a SWOT analysis to evaluate strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats, 5) identify appropriate strategies like developing networks or conducting research, and 6) monitor and evaluate progress using tools like outcome mapping.
Research uptake: DFID learning from experience
A presentation by Rachel Hinton as part of the Cohort Research for Programme and Policy panel discussion at the International Symposium on Cohort and Longitudinal Studies in Developing Contexts, UNICEF Office of Research - Innocenti, Florence, Italy 13-15 October 2014
ICAR-IFPRI : Policy process and extension policy communications - Suresh Babu
ICAR-IFPRI : Policy process and extension policy communications - Suresh BabuInternational Food Policy Research Institute- South Asia Office
ICAR-IFPRI: Methodologies in Agricultural Extension Research capacity development program from September 21-24, 2015 in New Delhi Growing Conversations Launch Presentation
Growing Conversations is a process to improve community planning in Toronto through a better engagement process. This presentation was made at the project launch on June 24, 2014, and serves as an introduction to the project objectives, elements, and timeline.
Growing Conversations Launch Presentation
The document outlines a study to improve community engagement in Toronto's planning process. The study has five objectives: 1) understand current engagement strengths and weaknesses, 2) explore new engagement models, 3) implement community advisory groups, 4) broaden participation among key groups, and 5) improve feedback quality. The study will develop partnerships, an ethnic media strategy, a youth engagement strategy, and open data guidelines. Public outreach will occur through online consultation, roundtables, and workshops over the summer and fall to identify opportunities and principles for effective engagement.
Acacia Research and Learning Forum Tutorial 2
The document outlines the agenda and activities of a policy engagement tutorial held in Dakar, Senegal. It includes:
- Storytelling exercises where participants shared experiences engaging with policy processes
- Identification of 6 key lessons for effective policy engagement based on collective experiences
- Presentation of frameworks for analyzing the political context, evidence, and links between policy and research communities when influencing policy
- Discussion of tools for strategic policy engagement including the Alignment, Interest and Influence Matrix to map stakeholders and prioritize targets.
A strategic approach to policy engagement for research organisations
This is the presentation delivered as part of a two day workshop held in Nepal in 2014 aimed at communications professionals or the point person for communication within fifteen South Asian think tanks. Participants explored how they could adopt a systematic approach to planning research or knowledge outputs for policy engagement and influence. They explored the types of influencing outcomes they are focused on and their individual and institutional capacities to deliver strategic communication and policy engagement work. By the end of the workshop it was hoped that each participating institution would have identified a clear set of steps towards the development of a strategic approach to policy engagement and research communication at an institutional or programmatic level.
This workshop formed part of the IDRC funded Think Tanks Initiative South Asia programme. http://www.idrc.ca/EN/Programs/Social_and_Economic_Policy/Think_Tank_Initiative/Pages/About.aspx
Nhs citizen research workshop
Slides from NHS Citizen Research Workshop convened on the 7th of April 2015 at the University of Westminster to discuss the Research Hub, a brand new element of the NHS Citizen design intended to support wider research and knowledge sharing.
The aim of the workshop was to explore possible research questions and projects and this presentation introduces what NHS Citizen research might look like in its different forms.
Converting research into advocacy from Ilm Ideas on Slide Share
This document provides an overview of a workshop on converting research into advocacy. It includes information on advocacy strategies and formats, case studies, and exercises. Research tools used by grantees are summarized, including interviews, focus groups, and surveys. Key skills for using research for advocacy are identified, such as analyzing situations, identifying targets, and developing advocacy plans. Organizational capacity for research and advocacy is assessed. The purpose and definitions of advocacy are outlined. Steps for advocacy strategy formulation are presented, including selecting issues and understanding stakeholders. The document provides examples of advocacy at different levels from village to national.
Leduc Phipps Poetz: Development of indicators for measurement at each stage o...
Renee Leduc, Program Officer at Canada's NCE Secretariat presents on indicators, reporting and measurement for the NCE program with respect to Knowledge Translation, Commercialization and Socio-Economic benefit to Canadians (otherwise referred to as Knowledge and Technology Exchange and Exploitation KTEE). These slides represent part 1 of a 2 part co-presentation with NeuroDevNet NCE's KT Core. There is an accompanying handout that helps NCEs work through linking goals with outputs, outcomes and relates to the 2nd handout called "anatomy of an indicator" that helps users develop indicators.
Identifying Gender Dimensions In Your Projects Sept17 2008
This document discusses the importance of identifying gender dimensions in projects. It notes that doing so can help reduce poverty, comply with donor requests, and meet reporting requirements. Failing to consider gender can cause projects to miss their objectives or have unintended negative effects. The document provides examples of integrating gender considerations throughout the project cycle, from the initial needs assessment and design to implementation, monitoring, and evaluation.
Working with complexity: Six steps to enhance research
John Young's presentation at the GDN workshop on 'Maximizing the Impact of Agricultural Research in Africa' held in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia in October 2008. In his talk, he outlines how organisations can work within complex policy processes to achieve impact and expands on several tools that can be used as part of this process.
Relationship-based knowledge mobilization: systems-based KMb and consideratio...
The field of Knowledge Translation (KT) needs to consider the importance of risk perception as a key barrier for uptake of research findings. This presentation outlines several domains for risk perception identified as a result of case study/grounded theory methodology research on the restart of two nuclear generating stations in Ontario, Canada. Generalizable results for the field of KT, KMb are presented.
Jody Harris, IFPRI and LCIRAH "Assessing Intersectoral Coordination for Nutri...
Jody Harris, IFPRI and LCIRAH "Assessing Intersectoral Coordination for Nutri...Independent Science and Partnership Council of the CGIAR
Science Forum 2013 (www.scienceforum13.org)
Breakout Session 5 - Policy and Institutional Approached in Nutrition Sensitive Agriculture Role Of Gsc Os In International Development Presentation (K Jutze August 2009)
The document summarizes Kimberley Jutze's 2009 research project on the role of global social change organizations (GSCOs) in international development. The research aimed to understand how GSCOs function and their development activities. It reviewed literature on the emergence of GSCOs and their distinguishing characteristics. Key findings were that GSCOs take an ideological approach, are influenced by stakeholders, and face challenges balancing flexibility with efficiency and interests. The research findings identified effective GSCO functions and interventions like participatory management and grassroots collaborations. Common themes were inclusion, capacity-building, sustainability, and collaboration. It concluded the research supported most literature but showed GSCOs intend systemic change over doing good alone.
Planning for impact: Basic communication strategies
This presentation from Jeff Knezovich of the Overseas Development Institute was given at a workshop held on research packaging at ESRF in Tanzania in August 2008. It was prepared for the Micro-level Perspectives of Growth project currently being undertaken by the University of Dar es Salaam Department of Economics. More information on the project can be found at http://www.esrftz.org/mlpg
FoME Symposium 2015 | Workshop 8: Current Evaluation Practices and Perspectiv...
This presentation was held at the FoME Symposium, Oct. 1-2, 2015 at DW Akademie Bonn. FoME stands for "Forum Medien und Entwicklung". It's the German Forum "Media and Development", a network of institutions and individuals active in the field of media development cooperation.
Find the Symposium’s documentation here: http://fome.info/2015
Power of partnership conference: Presentation: New norms and forms of develop...
Power of partnership conference: Presentation: New norms and forms of develop...The Impact Initiative
Power of partnership conference: Presentation: New norms and forms of development: Brokerage of foreign aid in maternal and child health service development and delivery in Nepal and MalawiWebinar | Gender Equality in National Adaptation Plan (NAP) Processes: Assess...
Webinar | Gender Equality in National Adaptation Plan (NAP) Processes: Assess...International Institute for Sustainable Development
This NAP Global Network event highlighted how to use the Toolkit for a Gender-Responsive Process to Formulate and Implement NAPs to ensure gender equality is considered in the assessment of vulnerabilities and identification of adaptation options.What's hot (20)
Case Study for Research Ethics Social Audit for Public Service Delivery_PACc
Case Study for Research Ethics Social Audit for Public Service Delivery_PACc
ICAR-IFPRI : Policy process and extension policy communications - Suresh Babu
ICAR-IFPRI : Policy process and extension policy communications - Suresh Babu
A strategic approach to policy engagement for research organisations
A strategic approach to policy engagement for research organisations
Converting research into advocacy from Ilm Ideas on Slide Share
Converting research into advocacy from Ilm Ideas on Slide Share
Leduc Phipps Poetz: Development of indicators for measurement at each stage o...
Leduc Phipps Poetz: Development of indicators for measurement at each stage o...
Identifying Gender Dimensions In Your Projects Sept17 2008
Identifying Gender Dimensions In Your Projects Sept17 2008
Working with complexity: Six steps to enhance research
Working with complexity: Six steps to enhance research
Relationship-based knowledge mobilization: systems-based KMb and consideratio...
Relationship-based knowledge mobilization: systems-based KMb and consideratio...
Jody Harris, IFPRI and LCIRAH "Assessing Intersectoral Coordination for Nutri...
Jody Harris, IFPRI and LCIRAH "Assessing Intersectoral Coordination for Nutri...
Role Of Gsc Os In International Development Presentation (K Jutze August 2009)
Role Of Gsc Os In International Development Presentation (K Jutze August 2009)
Planning for impact: Basic communication strategies
Planning for impact: Basic communication strategies
FoME Symposium 2015 | Workshop 8: Current Evaluation Practices and Perspectiv...
FoME Symposium 2015 | Workshop 8: Current Evaluation Practices and Perspectiv...
Power of partnership conference: Presentation: New norms and forms of develop...
Power of partnership conference: Presentation: New norms and forms of develop...
Webinar | Gender Equality in National Adaptation Plan (NAP) Processes: Assess...
Webinar | Gender Equality in National Adaptation Plan (NAP) Processes: Assess...
Similar to Think Tanks External Context_R4D
2011 global-go-to-think-tanks-report
This document summarizes the 2011 Global Go To Think Tank Rankings report. It announces the launch of the 2011 rankings and report, which ranks think tanks around the world. It provides statistics on the scope of the ranking process, which involved over 1,500 individuals from 120 countries participating in nominations and rankings across 30 categories. The rankings are based on nominations and evaluations from experts on specific regions and fields. The document outlines the methodology used in the 2011 rankings process and categories included. It acknowledges efforts to improve representations of think tanks from non-G7 countries in the rankings.
Global global think tanks report 2011
This document announces the launch of the 2011 Global Go To Think Tanks Rankings report. It provides an overview of the ranking methodology, which involved nominations and evaluations from over 7,000 think tanks and experts in 182 countries. Key statistics on the scope and participation in the ranking process are highlighted. The rankings are organized into categories evaluating think tanks worldwide, by region, by research area, and for special achievements. The report aims to recognize influential think tanks and improve their capacity through an open and transparent ranking process.
CSIS Ranked World’s #1 Security & International Affairs Think Tank
CSIS Ranked World’s #1 Security & International Affairs Think TankProfessor Eric K. Noji, M.D., MPH, DTMH(Lon), FRCP(UK)hon
The Global GoTo Think Tank Index is the result of an international survey of over 1,950 scholars, public and private donors, policy makers, and journalists who helped rank more than 6,500 think tanks using a set of 18 criteria developed by the TTCSP. The purpose of the rankings is to help improve the profile and performance of think tanks while highlighting the important work they do for governments and civil societies around the world.Strategies to enhance research impact: Six lessons
John Young's presentation at the GDN workshop on 'Maximizing the Impact of Agricultural Research in Africa' held in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia in October 2008. In his talk, he reviews and expands upon the six lessons that ODI's RAPID programme has learned about helping research inform policy and practice.
487816 959(1)
This document provides an overview of the 2013 Global Go To Think Tank Index report produced by the Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program at the University of Pennsylvania. It summarizes the methodology used to rank over 6,000 think tanks based on nominations from experts. The report ranks think tanks in categories such as top think tanks in the world, by region, by area of research, and special achievement. It acknowledges contributions from researchers, peer institutions, and expert panels in compiling both qualitative and quantitative data to determine the rankings in a transparent process aimed at better understanding the role of think tanks globally.
Randomised control trials: lessons for Civic Tech - Andrew Westbury (Center f...
The document summarizes insights from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that can inform civic technology. It discusses how the Center for Effective Global Action (CEGA) conducts RCTs to test institutional reforms and provides three examples of information-based RCTs. One study in Brazil found that providing municipal audits led citizens to hold governments more accountable. A study in the Philippines found that providing voter information increased knowledge but also increased vote buying. A study in Sierra Leone found that political debates increased campaigning efforts. The document suggests civic technology could help enable more such studies and notes areas of potential partnership between researchers and practitioners.
Randomized Controlled Trials: Insights for Civic Tech
Randomized controlled trials – or RCTs – have dramatically changed the development landscape, casting doubt on the effectiveness of accepted strategies – like microfinance – and identifying the value of previously-unorthodox activities, like unconditional cash transfers.
However, what have these powerful tools taught us about state capacity, government accountability, and responsiveness? Moreover, what does the RCT literature tell us about the use of technology to improve public services and galvanize citizen groups?
Unfortunately, state capacity and government accountability are some of the least-researched areas of international development. The International Initiative for Impact Evaluation (3ie) reports that less than 3% of registered impact evaluations focus on governance-related issues.
Moreover, a review of 175 recent RCTs identified only approximately 30 that included a specific tech-focus and few of these evaluated used tech from the “bottom-up” to catalyse community-action, peer-to-peer collaboration, and citizen-led efforts to address civic issues.
The Center for Effective Global Action (CEGA) at UC-Berkeley has recently launched a multi-year effort to support randomised evaluations of governance interventions around the world. As a part of this process, CEGA this year published a white paper, surveying over 200 recent impact evaluations on governance issues to identify “what works” and highlight open research questions.
Copy of analytical research ctr go to pres
The document summarizes the Global Go-To Think Tank Index report produced by the Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program. It provides an overview of the report, which ranks think tanks worldwide based on a survey of over 1,500 experts. It discusses the scope and methodology of the rankings. The top 5 think tanks in several global and regional categories are listed as examples, including Brookings Institution, Chatham House, and Carnegie Endowment as top ranked think tanks worldwide.
The role of NGOs in Bangladesh: A critical perspective... Muhammed Shahin .IR
This presentation summarizes a research project on NGO participation in Bangladesh. The research has several chapters that discuss the context, objectives, questions, methodology, theoretical framework, findings, factors influencing problems, recommendations, and limitations. The central research question examines how foreign aid dependency and organizational problems affect NGO participation in socioeconomic development in Bangladesh. Key findings identified issues like foreign aid reliance, accountability, policy influence, and prioritizing higher classes. The research recommends alternative funding, reorienting to grassroots work, improving management, and strengthening relationships with government and donors.
The democratization of information
The document provides guidance for honors students on conducting a project related to the 2010/2011 honors study topic of "The Democratization of Information: Power, Peril, and Promise". It recommends keeping a journal to document research, leadership development, service activities, and collaboration. Examples of journal prompts are given related to choosing an issue, research process, leadership roles, intended impact, and feedback.
Li Yingying-- Master Thesis Defense
This thesis examines how LinkedIn China's sub-brand Chitu cultivates relationships with stakeholders in accordance with Chinese relationship and stakeholder management theories. It analyzes Chitu's relationship building strategies with key stakeholders like employees, users, and industry peers. Chitu focuses on triggering user self-expression and providing professional groups activities. Relationship cultivation is influenced by Chinese cultural concepts like guanxi, which Chitu leverages through reciprocity and trust. The thesis contributes to understanding how public relations theories apply in a Chinese context and offers implications for foreign companies to nurture stakeholder relationships in China.
What is Board Engagement Anyway (and how do we get more of it)?
Board engagement is a term often used but rarely defined.
Yet, building a highly engaged board is essential to the vitality of any board and organization. Join us for a lively “talk show” style webinar designed to explore ways to measure and build board engagement – with an eye toward improving your organization’s performance.
Policy tools, wellbeing impacts and value for money
from the Wellbeing policy tools course held by the What Works Centre for Wellbeing and the Centre for Economic Performance on 4 Oct 2017
Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair for Monica G. Williams, Disse...
This document summarizes Monica Georgette Williams' doctoral dissertation defense on the engagement levels of Historically Black College and University leaders in entrepreneurialism through fundraising. The dissertation examined the entrepreneurial orientation of public HBCU leaders and how that relates to the revenue-generating activities and financial stability of their institutions. The methodology involved an online questionnaire distributed to HBCU presidents and chief development officers. Major findings included common entrepreneurial traits among highly successful fundraisers and a connection between education levels and fundraising success. Conclusions determined that private fundraising is critical to HBCU survival given declines in public funding.
Systems Thinking: Working Backwards, Not Backwards Thinking HENDRIX-JENKINS
CORE Group GHPC15
October 9, 2015
SBC Workshop: Behavior Change in the Age of Complexity: Implications for Monitoring and Evaluation
Stakeholder Engagement in the Context of Conflict Analysis and Intervention
This document discusses stakeholder engagement in the context of conflict analysis and intervention. It defines stakeholders as any person, group, or organization that can impact or be impacted by an action. The document outlines different types of stakeholders and explains engagement as understanding stakeholders' views and being accountable to them. It also presents models for analyzing stakeholders, including identifying their interests and levels of influence. Finally, it discusses best practices for stakeholder engagement strategies and international standards for reporting on such activities.
RoyalRoads
This document discusses stakeholder engagement in the context of conflict analysis and intervention. It defines stakeholders as any person, group, or organization impacted by a proposed action. The key aspects of stakeholder engagement discussed are: identifying primary and secondary stakeholders; understanding stakeholders' views; developing relationships through a continuum of engagement from informing to empowering stakeholders; and analyzing stakeholders' interests and power dynamics. The document also outlines best practices for stakeholder identification, analysis, and developing an engagement strategy.
Promoting Civic Engagement through Action Research Methodology
This document outlines an action research project to increase student voter turnout on college campuses. It begins with background on low voter turnout among young people. Action research is then defined as a collaborative method using data to solve organizational problems through cycles of planning, taking action, and evaluating. The document discusses key aspects of action research including stakeholder analysis, quantitative and qualitative data, collaboration, and addressing power dynamics. Attendees are led through an example action research cycle and encouraged to identify stakeholders, collect data, and discuss the role of power in their breakout groups.
Research Communication and Policy Process
This document discusses the importance of research communication and policy engagement. It provides several key points:
1. To improve the success of research influencing policy, it is important to systematically map the political context and understand the roles and power dynamics of different actors.
2. Research needs to be complemented by local and practical knowledge to be most relevant.
3. Researchers should understand policy processes, identify opportunities to engage policymakers, and work to build credibility and legitimacy by establishing relationships and presenting clear, practical solutions that align with existing narratives.
Similar to Think Tanks External Context_R4D (20)
CSIS Ranked World’s #1 Security & International Affairs Think Tank
CSIS Ranked World’s #1 Security & International Affairs Think Tank
Strategies to enhance research impact: Six lessons
Strategies to enhance research impact: Six lessons
Randomised control trials: lessons for Civic Tech - Andrew Westbury (Center f...
Randomised control trials: lessons for Civic Tech - Andrew Westbury (Center f...
Randomized Controlled Trials: Insights for Civic Tech
Randomized Controlled Trials: Insights for Civic Tech
The role of NGOs in Bangladesh: A critical perspective... Muhammed Shahin .IR
The role of NGOs in Bangladesh: A critical perspective... Muhammed Shahin .IR
What is Board Engagement Anyway (and how do we get more of it)?
What is Board Engagement Anyway (and how do we get more of it)?
Policy tools, wellbeing impacts and value for money
Policy tools, wellbeing impacts and value for money
Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair for Monica G. Williams, Disse...
Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair for Monica G. Williams, Disse...
Systems Thinking: Working Backwards, Not Backwards Thinking HENDRIX-JENKINS
Systems Thinking: Working Backwards, Not Backwards Thinking HENDRIX-JENKINS
Stakeholder Engagement in the Context of Conflict Analysis and Intervention
Stakeholder Engagement in the Context of Conflict Analysis and Intervention
Promoting Civic Engagement through Action Research Methodology
Promoting Civic Engagement through Action Research Methodology
Recently uploaded
一比一原版(QU毕业证)皇后大学毕业证如何办理
QU本科学位证成绩单【微信95270640】《皇后大学毕业证书原版制作QU成绩单》【Q微信95270640】《仿制QU毕业证成绩单皇后大学学位证书pdf电子图》，A.为什么留学生需要操作留信认证?
留信认证全称全国留学生信息服务网认证,隶属于北京中科院。①留信认证门槛条件更低,费用更美丽,并且包过,完单周期短,效率高②留信认证虽然不能去国企,但是一般的公司都没有问题,因为国内很多公司连基本的留学生学历认证都不了解。这对于留学生来说,这就比自己光拿一个证书更有说服力,因为留学学历可以在留信网站上进行查询!
B.为什么我们提供的毕业证成绩单具有使用价值？
查询留服认证是国内鉴别留学生海外学历的唯一途径，但认证只是个体行为，不是所有留学生都操作，所以没有办理认证的留学生的学历在国内也是查询不到的，他们也仅仅只有一张文凭。所以这时候我们提供的和学校颁发的一模一样的毕业证成绩单，就有了使用价值。
实体公司，专业可靠，办理加拿大毕业证|办美国成绩单|做德国文凭学历认证|办新西兰学位证，办澳洲文凭认证，办留信网认证（网上可查，实体公司，专业可靠）铸就十年品质！信誉！实体公司！
文凭办理流程：
1客户提供办理信息：姓名生日专业学位毕业时间等（如信息不确定可以咨询顾问：微信95270640我们有专业老师帮你查询）；
2开始安排制作毕业证成绩单电子图；
3毕业证成绩单电子版做好以后发送给您确认；
4毕业证成绩单电子版您确认信息无误之后安排制作成品；
5成品做好拍照或者视频给您确认；
6快递给客户（国内顺丰国外DHLUPS等快读邮寄）。
7完成交易删除客户资料
高精端提供以下服务：
一：皇后大学皇后大学毕业证文凭证书全套材料从防伪到印刷水印底纹到钢印烫金
二：真实使馆认证（留学人员回国证明）使馆存档
三：真实教育部认证教育部存档教育部留服网站可查
四：留信认证留学生信息网站可查
五：与学校颁发的相关证件1:1纸质尺寸制定（定期向各大院校毕业生购买最新版本毕,业证成绩单保证您拿到的是鲁昂大学内部最新版本毕业证成绩单微信95270640）
A.为什么留学生需要操作留信认证?
留信认证全称全国留学生信息服务网认证,隶属于北京中科院。①留信认证门槛条件更低,费用更美丽,并且包过,完单周期短,效率高②留信认证虽然不能去国企,但是一般的公司都没有问题,因为国内很多公司连基本的留学生学历认证都不了解。这对于留学生来说,这就比自己光拿一个证书更有说服力,因为留学学历可以在留信网站上进行查询!
B.为什么我们提供的毕业证成绩单具有使用价值？
查询留服认证是国内鉴别留学生海外学历的唯一途径但认证只是个体行为不是所有留学生都操作所以没有办理认证的留学生的学历在国内也是查询不到的他们也仅仅只有一张文凭。所以这时候我们提供的和学校颁发的一模一样的毕业证成绩单就有了使用价值。娃拒绝父亲送说往车上一躺就等着下车决无丢失的道理有手机在身联系也方便再说他都岁了还有大半车的小伙伴相伴他不怕在父亲千叮咛万嘱咐中山娃依依不舍地爬上车朝窗外不住地挥手别了父亲别了父亲的城别了我的暑假生活我的城市生活望着窗外挥舞的大手还有那张微驼的背一向坚强的山娃禁不住泪如雨下当我坐下来想写这封信时“感恩两字在我脑海中回旋很幸运我有这样的机会能将埋在心底深深的感激之情得以表达从婴儿的“哇哇坠地到哺育听
Impact of Effective Performance Appraisal Systems on Employee Motivation and ...
Healthy economic development requires properly managing the banking industry of any
country. Along with state-owned banks, private banks play a critical role in the country's economy.
Managers in all types of banks now confront the same challenge: how to get the utmost output from
their employees. Therefore, Performance appraisal appears to be inevitable since it set the
standard for comparing actual performance to established objectives and recommending practical
solutions that help the organization achieve sustainable growth. Therefore, the purpose of this
research is to determine the effect of performance appraisal on employee motivation and retention.
在线办理(UVic毕业证书)维多利亚大学毕业证录取通知书一模一样
学校原件一模一样【微信：741003700 】《(UVic毕业证书)维多利亚大学毕业证》【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
原版制作(CDU毕业证书)查尔斯达尔文大学毕业证PDF成绩单一模一样
学校原件一模一样【微信：741003700 】《(CDU毕业证书)查尔斯达尔文大学毕业证PDF成绩单》【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
Chart--Time Management.pdf How to time is spent
Time management is foundation for any successful activity.
Addiction to Winning Across Diverse Populations.pdf
A anaysis dedicated to identify the addiction on winniing by diverse population
Risk-Management-presentation for cooperatives
Power point presentation for risk management for cooperatives
Enriching engagement with ethical review processes
New ethics review processes at the University of Bath. Presented at the 8th World Conference on Research Integrity by Filipa Vance, Head of Research Governance and Compliance at the University of Bath. June 2024, Athens
Strategy for E-Types - Strategy Formulation.pptx
Capstone project for Coursera - Strategy Formulation
在线办理(Murdoch毕业证书)莫道克大学毕业证电子版成绩单一模一样
学校原件一模一样【微信：741003700 】《(Murdoch毕业证书)莫道克大学毕业证电子版成绩单》【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
20240608 QFM019 Engineering Leadership Reading List May 2024
Everything I found interesting about Engineering Leadership in May 2024
The Management Guide: From Projects to Portfolio
A presentation on mastering key management concepts across projects, products, programs, and portfolios. Whether you're an aspiring manager or looking to enhance your skills, this session will provide you with the knowledge and tools to succeed in various management roles. Learn about the distinct lifecycles, methodologies, and essential skillsets needed to thrive in today's dynamic business environment.
Resource-mobilization-guide-for-community-based-organizations1.pdf
resource mobilization guidebook for comminute based organizations
Employment Practices Regulation and Multinational Corporations
Employment Practices Regulation and Multinational Corporations
Strategic decision making within MNCs constrained or determined by the implementation of laws and codes of practice and by pressure from political actors. Managers in MNCs have to make choices that are shaped by gvmt. intervention and the local economy.
原版制作(澳洲WSU毕业证书)西悉尼大学毕业证文凭证书一模一样
学校原件一模一样【微信：741003700 】《(澳洲WSU毕业证书)西悉尼大学毕业证、文凭证书》【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
Conflict resololution,role of hr in resolution
Conflict resolution techniques in modern day organizations is critical for overall productivity
Integrity in leadership builds trust by ensuring consistency between words an...
Integrity in leadership builds trust by ensuring consistency between words and actions, making leaders reliable and credible. It also ensures ethical decision-making, which fosters a positive organizational culture and promotes long-term success. #RamVChary
Comparing Stability and Sustainability in Agile Systems
Copy of the presentation given at XP2024 based on a research paper.
In this paper we explain wat overwork is and the physical and mental health risks associated with it.
We then explore how overwork relates to system stability and inventory.
Finally there is a call to action for Team Leads / Scrum Masters / Managers to measure and monitor excess work for individual teams.
Credit Management training seminar power point presentation
Credit management training seminar presentation
Recently uploaded (20)
Impact of Effective Performance Appraisal Systems on Employee Motivation and ...
Impact of Effective Performance Appraisal Systems on Employee Motivation and ...
Addiction to Winning Across Diverse Populations.pdf
Addiction to Winning Across Diverse Populations.pdf
Enriching engagement with ethical review processes
Enriching engagement with ethical review processes
20240608 QFM019 Engineering Leadership Reading List May 2024
20240608 QFM019 Engineering Leadership Reading List May 2024
Resource-mobilization-guide-for-community-based-organizations1.pdf
Resource-mobilization-guide-for-community-based-organizations1.pdf
Employment Practices Regulation and Multinational Corporations
Employment Practices Regulation and Multinational Corporations
Integrity in leadership builds trust by ensuring consistency between words an...
Integrity in leadership builds trust by ensuring consistency between words an...
Comparing Stability and Sustainability in Agile Systems
Comparing Stability and Sustainability in Agile Systems
Credit Management training seminar power point presentation
Credit Management training seminar power point presentation
Think Tanks External Context_R4D
- 1. Think Tanks’ External Context Results from Linking Think Tank Performance, Decisions, and Context, a Global Research Project Results for Development Institute Washington, D.C. 18-20 February 2015 Elizabeth Brown
- 2. Presentation Outline Research Overview Context Framework External Context Political and Economic, Donor Intellectual, Civil Society How We Operationalized External Context 2 | R4D.org
- 3. Main Research Questions and Approaches 1. What is context and how is it measured? Think tank and donor elite interviews Literature review of context and think tanks Survey of think tanks 2. How does context effect think tank decision- making and policy effectiveness? In depth case studies 3. How do think tanks evaluate and respond to context in practice? Think tank Executive Director interviews Focus groups Objective: Explore the relationship between political, economic and social context and think tank strategic behavior and performance
- 5. Four Main External Context Factors | R4D.org Exogenous Factors Political and Economic Donor Mixed-Exogenous Factors Intellectual Civil Society
- 6. How Did We Think About and Measure External Context? Purpose Examine variation in think tanks’ external operating context across countries Audience Global audiences: think tank staff, executive directors, donors, and scholars Selecting Indicators Comparability: Widely available, country-level Commensurability: Consistent, reproducible Availability: Frequent (annual) Recognizable: Understood by a broad audience
- 7. Example: Measures of Political and Economic Factors
- 8. How Did We Use It? Impact of context on (3) levels of self-reported outcomes: 1. Policy Discussion/Dialogue 2. Government’s Policy Implementation 3. Policy Adopted by Government Few significant relationships Negative, significant correlation of GDP with (3) Increasingly negative relationship 8
- 9. Thank You! 9 | R4D.org