Pests of soyabean_Binomics_IdentificationDr.UPR.pdf
The structure of scientific revolutions (anuj)
1. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
-Thomas S. Kuhn
(Ch. V to IX)
Anuj Vijay Bhatia
FPRM 14
Institute of Rural Management Anand
2. A Role of History
The Route to Normal Science
The Nature of Normal Science
Normal Science as Puzzle Solving
Till now we have seen..
3. Easy to determine Paradigms of a mature science
Shared paradigms does not imply shared rules.
Historians must compare paradigms
Identify isolable elements
Identify accepted rules and principles
The Priority of Paradigms
4. Search for rules : A source of deep frustration.
What abstract characteristics make solutions to problem
permanent?
Scientists disagree to the interpretations of paradigm
Existence of paradigm isn't existence of rules
Scientist must know certain rules
No set of characteristics is applicable to all
5. “Paradigms may be prior to, more binding, and more
complete than any set of rules for research that could
be unequivocally abstracted from them”
-Thomas Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
6. Paradigms can determine normal science without
intervention of discoverable rules.
Reasons:
1. Difficulty of Discovering Rules
2. The nature of Scientific Education
3. Normal Science can proceed without rules
4. Shared Paradigm not same for all
7. Paradigm change is brought by anomaly
Normal Science doesn’t aim at novelties
New and unsuspected phenomenon uncovered
Fundamental novelties bring paradigm change.
Anomaly and the Emergence of Scientific Discoveries
8. How changes in paradigm shift came about?
1. Awareness of anomalies.
2. Observational and conceptual recognition
3. The consequent change of paradigm and Resistance
9. Scientist see nature in different way
New facts/anomalies does not always lead to paradigm change
Not all theories are paradigm theories
Novelty emerges only with difficulty
Novelties are manifested by resistance
10. Constructive and Destructive Changes
Awareness of anomaly
Professional Insecurity
Failure of Rules
Discrepancy between theory and fact
Changes in social/cultural climates
Science is often “ridden by dogma”
Crisis and the Emergence of Scientific Theories
11. New theory after failure
Novel theory is direct response to crisis
Crisis is often surprising
Multiple theoretical construction from same data
Not difficult to invent alternatives
Resistance to alternatives if tools are useful
Retooling is an extravagance
Crisis provides opportunity to retool
12. Anomalies must result in crisis
Pre-condition for paradigm change
Crisis is “essential tension”
No research without counterinstances
Counterinstances creates tension and crisis
Crisis is implicit in research
The Response to Crisis
13. Responses to Crisis
1. Consider Alternatives
2. Don’t treat anomalies as counterinstances
3. Ad hoc modifications
4. Leave the profession
14. Persistent and recognized anomaly does not induce crisis
Failure discredits scientists and not theory
Carpenter blaming his tools
Science Education: Confirmation theory
15. An anomaly should be more than just an anomaly
Anomalies are always there
Cannot examine every anomaly
It can question fundamental generalization of paradigms
It has practical implications
More than just another puzzle
Resistance
16. Crisis begins with blurring of paradigm
Loosens rules for normal research
Anomaly gets recognition
It gets attention too
Scientist express discontent
Competing articulations proliferate
Try to resolve
Often leads to new discoveries
17. Crisis closes in following ways:
1. Normal Science solves the anomaly
2. Anomaly is set aside again
3. A new paradigm solves the anomaly: Paradigm wars
Invalid paradigm: Only if alternate candidate is available
Reconstruction of the field from new fundamentals
Emergence of new paradigms
18. Transition from former to alternate paradigm
Changed view of the field, methods and goals
Reorientation: Same data in different framework
New Paradigms with different universe of discourse
Transition to new paradigm : Scientific Revolution
From normal to extraordinary research
19. “….scientific revolutions are taken to be those non-
cumulative developmental episodes in which an older
paradigm is replaced in whole or part by incompatible new
one.”
-Kuhn, T. (1979). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. (Second ed.).
Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
The Nature and Necessity of Scientific
Revolutions
20. Scientific Revolution is Similar to Political Revolution
Anomaly and Crisis
Dissatisfaction with existing institutions
Change in institutions
Members become estranged and act eccentrically
Reconstruction on new institutional framework
Competing camps and parties
Political recourse fails due to polarization
Parties resort to mass persuasion