Se muestran algunas de las aplicaciones desarrolladas para evaluar revistas científicas, autores, y editoriales a partir de Google Scholar y sus productos derivados (Google Scholar Metrics y Google Scholar Citations
The two faces of Google Scholar
Opening the academic Pandora’s Box
Why do we call it a big data bibliometric tool?
Drawbacks Google Scholar, Google Scholar Citations, Google Scholar Metrics
O SIBiUSP em parceria com a American Journal Experts - AJE (empresa especializada em ajudar pesquisadores à eliminar as barreiras linguísticas e ter seu trabalho publicado nas revistas de mais alto impacto) traz para a comunidade científica de São Paulo o "Workshop de Publicação Científica - AJE", apresentado pela Gerente de Parcerias Estratégicas do Square Research, Amy Beisel.
This presentation I first discusses PoP's history, its philosophy, as well as recent new features and data sources, before sharing some survey data on what people use Publish or Perish for and what their background is.
The major part of the presentation focused on specific use cases for Publish or Perish. In the presentation you will learn how to track your citations in different data sources, how to make your case for tenure or promotion, how to clean your Google Scholar Profile, and how to export both bibliographic details and query results or metrics.
Workshop de autores realizado em parceria com os editores da Springer Nature, Biblioteca Central e Biblioteca do Biociências da UFRGS, dia 25 de outubro de 2018. Ministrante Christina Eckey.
The two faces of Google Scholar
Opening the academic Pandora’s Box
Why do we call it a big data bibliometric tool?
Drawbacks Google Scholar, Google Scholar Citations, Google Scholar Metrics
O SIBiUSP em parceria com a American Journal Experts - AJE (empresa especializada em ajudar pesquisadores à eliminar as barreiras linguísticas e ter seu trabalho publicado nas revistas de mais alto impacto) traz para a comunidade científica de São Paulo o "Workshop de Publicação Científica - AJE", apresentado pela Gerente de Parcerias Estratégicas do Square Research, Amy Beisel.
This presentation I first discusses PoP's history, its philosophy, as well as recent new features and data sources, before sharing some survey data on what people use Publish or Perish for and what their background is.
The major part of the presentation focused on specific use cases for Publish or Perish. In the presentation you will learn how to track your citations in different data sources, how to make your case for tenure or promotion, how to clean your Google Scholar Profile, and how to export both bibliographic details and query results or metrics.
Workshop de autores realizado em parceria com os editores da Springer Nature, Biblioteca Central e Biblioteca do Biociências da UFRGS, dia 25 de outubro de 2018. Ministrante Christina Eckey.
Presentación realizada en la European Sumer for Scientometrics 2014. Viena, 10 de julio de 2014 http://www.scientometrics-school.eu/programme.html
Since its emergence in 2004, Google Scholar has attracted a huge interest in the scientific community. More recently, it has also drawn attention not only as a information source but also as a tool for evaluation purposes.
The launch of products such as Google Scholar Citations and Metrics or the recent agreement with Thomson Reuters' Web of Science shows that Google is already a major player in the scientific information market.
Its price (free), its huge coverage and the better attention to Social Science and Humanities (compared to commercial databases) has made Google Scholar a potentially valid source for bibliometrics in these areas. Nevertheless, Google Scholar (and their tools) presents many shortcomings that are necessary to know to perform reliable analysis.
In this session, we will briefly review Google Scholar pros and cons and will examine the usefulness of tools such as Citations and Metrics.
Search challenges for collections of book recordsArjen de Vries
Roberto Corniacchia's presentation to the ECIR 2014 Industry Day: http://ecir2014.org/industry-day/
Bibliographic data have always represented an interesting case for Information Retrieval. Books have authors, title, editions, publishers, identification codes and so on; they can cite other publications and be held by a number of libraries. Digital humanities and the cultural heritage domain invest an increasing effort in the preservation, valorisation and exploitation of bibliographic data, with an emphasis on open data. This not only means that larger volumes of data are available, but also that such data sets are more and more linked together, with consequent challenges about their integration. So, even though “books” and their archival records have not changed for decades, the scale of the problem is changing rapidly.
Secondly, the spectrum of information needs to be satisfied is growing larger. The increase in available (open) data demands innovative services to be developed, whether they target researchers, librarians, or end users, and whether the context is an academic, cultural or commercial setting. The associated information retrieval challenge is no longer just about finding a book by its author’s last name. Full-text search combined with a few facets may address more complex needs, but does not help to exploit the linked nature of today’s open data to the maximum opportunity. The key problem is how to use effectively the full amount of linked data that are being made available online, increasing day by day; and turn this rich source of information into novel search scenarios: what are the most prestigious academic publishers, based on scientific citations, online consumer reviews and ratings? How can a search system tailor the quest for a book to the age of the expected
reader?
We discuss how Spinque addresses these challenges of rich interlinked book data, using its core Search by Strategy concept to separate concerns about modelling the various types of data and their interrelations, and customizing the ranking of information objects accordingly. Here, search processes are modelled on top of structured and unstructured data, with an integrated support for probabilistic reasoning in order to deal transparently with both exact and missing / vague information. We discuss this case of book records in the specific context of EU-funded project COMSODE (Components Supporting the Open Data Exploitation). The envisioned Open Data Node platform aims at effective reuse of integrated data sources, with a strong emphasis on data quality.
Publish or Perish - Realising Google Scholar's potential to democratise citat...Anne-Wil Harzing
I discuss five key topics:
* Brief historical overview of “citizen bibliometrics”, i.e. use of bibliometrics by non-experts
* How Publish or Perish and Google Scholar have democratised citation analysis
* Publish or Perish users: who are they and how do they use PoP?
* Publish or Perish version 5: key new features
* What’s next for citizen bibliometrics?
Predatory Open Access Journals: Academic Beware!Anne-Wil Harzing
Provides an overview of my research into predatory open access journals, discussing their key characteristics and providing recommendations for academics to avoid them.
Citation metrics across disciplines - Google Scholar, Scopus, and the Web of ...Anne-Wil Harzing
Key conclusions:
1. Will the use of citation metrics disadvantage the Social Sciences and Humanities?
* Not, if you use a database that includes publications important in those disciplines (e.g. books, national journals)
* Not, if you correct for differences in co-authorships
2. Is peer review better than metrics for the Social Sciences and Humanities?
* Yes, in a way…. The ideal version of peer review (informed, dedicated, and unbiased experts) is better than a reductionist version of metrics
* However, an inclusive version of metrics is probably better than the likely reality of peer review (hurried semi-experts, potentially influenced by journal outlet and affiliation)
Explore Your World with EBSCO's ExploraKarenSteiger2
An instructional presentation for my LIS 702 course at Dominican University (a graduate Library and Information Science course). The assignment tasks students with creating a PowerPoint presentation instructing users to use a reference source cited in a previous assignment. I am not affiliated with EBSCO or the Schaumburg Township District Library; I assumed the role of a reference librarian at the Schaumburg Township District Library to meet the parameters of the assignment. I would be delighted if you find this guide helpful, however!
Building your academic brand through engagement with social mediaAnne-Wil Harzing
What constitutes social media in an academic context?
Why do you (not) use social media?
Five key types of social media with different functions
Brief overview of key purpose and functionality
Look at a real-life example
Recommendations for how to use social media
EBSCO History Reference Center at the Idaho Falls Public LibraryAleishaStout1
How to access EBSCO History Reference Center through the Idaho Falls Public Library; what full text means; what peer review means; why you cite sources, basic search strategy
Researcher KnowHow session presented by Amy Lewin, Marketing and Innovation Coordinator, and Sarah Roughley Barake, Scholarly Communications Librarian at the University of Liverpool Library
Can we use altmetric at institutional level?Torres Salinas
This paper aims at exploring the coverage of the Altmetric.com database and its potential use in order to show universities’ research profiles in relationship with other databases. Specifically, our objectives are the following:
1. Analyse the coverage of Altmetric.com at the institutional level and verify its validity as a data source for obtaining alternative metrics derived from the research activity of universities in comparison with those from the Web of Science. For this, we will work with a small sample of four Spanish universities.
2. Analyse coverage differences when obtainin bibliometric profiles from Altmetric.com and Web of Science. In some studies a higher coverage of the Social Sciences and Humanities has been reported, suggesting the potential of altmetric indicators in these areas (Costas, Zahedi, & Wouters, 2015b).
Sexta edición de este curso, que pretende enseñar a escribir, publicar y difundir un artículo científico en una revista. Se proporcionan consejos y reglas sobre publicación. Se explica cómo seleccionar la revista donde publicar (criterios y procedimientos), cómo redactar los distintos apartados de un artículo científico (título, resumen, palabras clave, autoría, introducción, metodología, resultados y conclusiones, bibliografía) y cómo relacionarse con la revista donde se va a publicar el trabajo (envío, contestación revisores, revisión del trabajo, corrección de pruebas). Se finaliza indicando cómo puede difundirse el artículo
The transformation of scientific communication
From the Gutenberg Galaxy to the Web Galaxy
The Google Scholar Revolution An alternative model of publication and communication?
Research evaluation: A determining factor for academic communication practices
From Bibliometrics To Webometrics - Altmetrics
ALLMETRICS: The measuring of Science
Gamification of the scientific endeavour
Will the metric become an end in itself? New “scientific illnesses” impactitis, egotitis…
Presentación realizada en la European Sumer for Scientometrics 2014. Viena, 10 de julio de 2014 http://www.scientometrics-school.eu/programme.html
Since its emergence in 2004, Google Scholar has attracted a huge interest in the scientific community. More recently, it has also drawn attention not only as a information source but also as a tool for evaluation purposes.
The launch of products such as Google Scholar Citations and Metrics or the recent agreement with Thomson Reuters' Web of Science shows that Google is already a major player in the scientific information market.
Its price (free), its huge coverage and the better attention to Social Science and Humanities (compared to commercial databases) has made Google Scholar a potentially valid source for bibliometrics in these areas. Nevertheless, Google Scholar (and their tools) presents many shortcomings that are necessary to know to perform reliable analysis.
In this session, we will briefly review Google Scholar pros and cons and will examine the usefulness of tools such as Citations and Metrics.
Search challenges for collections of book recordsArjen de Vries
Roberto Corniacchia's presentation to the ECIR 2014 Industry Day: http://ecir2014.org/industry-day/
Bibliographic data have always represented an interesting case for Information Retrieval. Books have authors, title, editions, publishers, identification codes and so on; they can cite other publications and be held by a number of libraries. Digital humanities and the cultural heritage domain invest an increasing effort in the preservation, valorisation and exploitation of bibliographic data, with an emphasis on open data. This not only means that larger volumes of data are available, but also that such data sets are more and more linked together, with consequent challenges about their integration. So, even though “books” and their archival records have not changed for decades, the scale of the problem is changing rapidly.
Secondly, the spectrum of information needs to be satisfied is growing larger. The increase in available (open) data demands innovative services to be developed, whether they target researchers, librarians, or end users, and whether the context is an academic, cultural or commercial setting. The associated information retrieval challenge is no longer just about finding a book by its author’s last name. Full-text search combined with a few facets may address more complex needs, but does not help to exploit the linked nature of today’s open data to the maximum opportunity. The key problem is how to use effectively the full amount of linked data that are being made available online, increasing day by day; and turn this rich source of information into novel search scenarios: what are the most prestigious academic publishers, based on scientific citations, online consumer reviews and ratings? How can a search system tailor the quest for a book to the age of the expected
reader?
We discuss how Spinque addresses these challenges of rich interlinked book data, using its core Search by Strategy concept to separate concerns about modelling the various types of data and their interrelations, and customizing the ranking of information objects accordingly. Here, search processes are modelled on top of structured and unstructured data, with an integrated support for probabilistic reasoning in order to deal transparently with both exact and missing / vague information. We discuss this case of book records in the specific context of EU-funded project COMSODE (Components Supporting the Open Data Exploitation). The envisioned Open Data Node platform aims at effective reuse of integrated data sources, with a strong emphasis on data quality.
Publish or Perish - Realising Google Scholar's potential to democratise citat...Anne-Wil Harzing
I discuss five key topics:
* Brief historical overview of “citizen bibliometrics”, i.e. use of bibliometrics by non-experts
* How Publish or Perish and Google Scholar have democratised citation analysis
* Publish or Perish users: who are they and how do they use PoP?
* Publish or Perish version 5: key new features
* What’s next for citizen bibliometrics?
Predatory Open Access Journals: Academic Beware!Anne-Wil Harzing
Provides an overview of my research into predatory open access journals, discussing their key characteristics and providing recommendations for academics to avoid them.
Citation metrics across disciplines - Google Scholar, Scopus, and the Web of ...Anne-Wil Harzing
Key conclusions:
1. Will the use of citation metrics disadvantage the Social Sciences and Humanities?
* Not, if you use a database that includes publications important in those disciplines (e.g. books, national journals)
* Not, if you correct for differences in co-authorships
2. Is peer review better than metrics for the Social Sciences and Humanities?
* Yes, in a way…. The ideal version of peer review (informed, dedicated, and unbiased experts) is better than a reductionist version of metrics
* However, an inclusive version of metrics is probably better than the likely reality of peer review (hurried semi-experts, potentially influenced by journal outlet and affiliation)
Explore Your World with EBSCO's ExploraKarenSteiger2
An instructional presentation for my LIS 702 course at Dominican University (a graduate Library and Information Science course). The assignment tasks students with creating a PowerPoint presentation instructing users to use a reference source cited in a previous assignment. I am not affiliated with EBSCO or the Schaumburg Township District Library; I assumed the role of a reference librarian at the Schaumburg Township District Library to meet the parameters of the assignment. I would be delighted if you find this guide helpful, however!
Building your academic brand through engagement with social mediaAnne-Wil Harzing
What constitutes social media in an academic context?
Why do you (not) use social media?
Five key types of social media with different functions
Brief overview of key purpose and functionality
Look at a real-life example
Recommendations for how to use social media
EBSCO History Reference Center at the Idaho Falls Public LibraryAleishaStout1
How to access EBSCO History Reference Center through the Idaho Falls Public Library; what full text means; what peer review means; why you cite sources, basic search strategy
Researcher KnowHow session presented by Amy Lewin, Marketing and Innovation Coordinator, and Sarah Roughley Barake, Scholarly Communications Librarian at the University of Liverpool Library
Can we use altmetric at institutional level?Torres Salinas
This paper aims at exploring the coverage of the Altmetric.com database and its potential use in order to show universities’ research profiles in relationship with other databases. Specifically, our objectives are the following:
1. Analyse the coverage of Altmetric.com at the institutional level and verify its validity as a data source for obtaining alternative metrics derived from the research activity of universities in comparison with those from the Web of Science. For this, we will work with a small sample of four Spanish universities.
2. Analyse coverage differences when obtainin bibliometric profiles from Altmetric.com and Web of Science. In some studies a higher coverage of the Social Sciences and Humanities has been reported, suggesting the potential of altmetric indicators in these areas (Costas, Zahedi, & Wouters, 2015b).
Sexta edición de este curso, que pretende enseñar a escribir, publicar y difundir un artículo científico en una revista. Se proporcionan consejos y reglas sobre publicación. Se explica cómo seleccionar la revista donde publicar (criterios y procedimientos), cómo redactar los distintos apartados de un artículo científico (título, resumen, palabras clave, autoría, introducción, metodología, resultados y conclusiones, bibliografía) y cómo relacionarse con la revista donde se va a publicar el trabajo (envío, contestación revisores, revisión del trabajo, corrección de pruebas). Se finaliza indicando cómo puede difundirse el artículo
The transformation of scientific communication
From the Gutenberg Galaxy to the Web Galaxy
The Google Scholar Revolution An alternative model of publication and communication?
Research evaluation: A determining factor for academic communication practices
From Bibliometrics To Webometrics - Altmetrics
ALLMETRICS: The measuring of Science
Gamification of the scientific endeavour
Will the metric become an end in itself? New “scientific illnesses” impactitis, egotitis…
Otras realidades, otros impactos, otras métricas: la nueva bibliometría
1. La medida de la ciencia
2. Hitos históricos evaluación bibliométrica
De la Bibliometrics: la evaluación de unos pocos, por unos pocos y para unos pocos A la Webmetrics y a la Altmetrics: La popularización y democratización de la evaluación científica La evaluación de todos, por todos, para todos, de todo, a todas horas y en todos los lugares
3.La nueva bibliometría:
3.1 Otras realidades
- Nuevos medios de comunicación Los sitios web
- Nuevos medios de comunicación Blogs
- Nuevos medios de comunicación Twitter
- Nuevos medios de comunicación Presentaciones
- Nuevos almacenes de información bibliográfica: los repositorios
- Nuevos almacenes de información bibliográfica : los gestores de referencias bibliográficas
- Las redes sociales científicas
3.2 Otros impactos Otras métricas
- Midiendo el impacto de los sitios web
- Midiendo el impacto de un Blog
- Midiendo el impacto en Twitter
- Midiendo el impacto de las presentaciones
- Midiendo el impacto de los documentos indizados en los repositorios
- Midiendo el impacto de los documentos indizados en los nuevos almacenes de información bibliográfica : los gestores de referencias bibliográficas
- Midiendo en las redes sociales científicas
3.3 Otras herramientas
- Construyendo rankings web. Nivel macro, Nivel micro (Google Analytics)
- Google Scholar: la nueva "casa de citas"
- LOS DERIVADOS BIBLIOMÉTRICOS DE GOOGLE SCHOLAR Google Scholar Metrics, Google Scholar Citations
3.4 ¿Qué futuro aguarda a los nuevas métricas?, ¿Cuál es el futuro de los nuevos medios de comunicación?, ¿Cuántos documentos posee las nuevas métricas?
- ¿Qué sabemos de las nuevas métricas? El sentido común Evidencias empíricas
- ¿Para qué los nuevos indicadores?
- ¿Qué impacto miden? Científico Profesional Educativo Social
- ¿Qué sabemos de Google Scholar como fuente de evaluación científica?
4. Los riesgos de la nueva bibliometría
- Problemas: La FUGACIDAD
- The Googledependency Problemas: La dependencia tecnológica
- El gran peligro: La MANIPULACIÓN
- ¿Se convertirá la métrica en un fin en sí mismo?
¿la medida alterará el fin mismo de la ciencia?
¿Un inquietante futuro?
Hábitos de comunicación de los científicos españoles de Ciencias Jurídicas
Criterios de evaluación de las publicaciones de ciencias jurídicas en España
Criterios ANECA
Criterios CNEAI
Herramientas de evaluación de publicaciones de ciencias jurídicas
SPI: Scholarly Publishers Indicators
Publishers Scholar Metrics
Book Publishers Library Metrics
BiPublishers
Web of Science
Scimago Journal Rank (Scopus)
IN-RECJ
Journal Scholar Metrics
Indice H de las revistas científicas españolas según Google Scholar Metrics
CIRC
MIAR
RESH
FECYT
LATINDEX
DICE
Se presentan algunas técnicas y herramientas para mejorar la visibilidad de la producción científica para investigadores de la Facultad de Ciencias de la Educación de la Universidad de Sevilla. [Editada la tabla comparativa de perfiles de autor con fecha 20/06/2014]
Conferencia impartida dentro de los Seminarios Doctorales de la Escuela Internacional de Doctorado de la Universidad de Murcia sobre la vida académica del doctorando. Se describen y comentan las principales actividades intelectuales que conforman el día al día de un doctorando: informarse, leer, indagar, escribir, publicar
Se ofrecen consejos a los futuros doctorandos sobre los errores a evitar en la elaboración de su tesis doctoral y las tareas y quehaceres intelectuales a desarrollar para ser un buen doctor.
A combination of powerpoint presentations on bibliometrics in higher education, originally presented at (CONCERT) Council on Core Electronic Resources in Taiwan, November 2008 and modified for a paper on bibliometrics and university rankings.
http://ir.library.smu.edu.sg/record=d1010558
Research impact metrics for librarians: calculation & contextLibrary_Connect
Slides from the May 19, 2016, Library Connect webinar "Research impact metrics for librarians: calculation & context" with Jenny Delasalle and Andrew Plume.
Watch the webinar at: https://libraryconnect.elsevier.com/library-connect-webinars?commid=199783
Apo presentation research librarians day feb 2017SusanMRob
Engagement & Impact through Open Access policy and Practice research & Resources via Australian Policy Online by Amanda Lawrence - presented at the Research Support Community Day 2017
Bibliometrics, Webometrics, Altmetrics, Alternative metrics.Andrea Scharnhorst
A. Scharnhorst (2016) Bibliometrics, Webometrics, Altmetrics, Alternative metrics. Presentation given at the COST Action TD1210 Knowescape Workshop “Alternative metrics or tailored metrics: Science dynamics for science policy”, November 9-10, 2016 Warsaw
A base de dados SciELO armazena e disponibiliza registros de metadados e de textos completos de aproximadamente 700 mil artigos de diferentes disciplinas e idiomas, originadas das coleções nacionais de periódicos da Rede SciELO de 16 países. Os registros de metadados contém os campos de dados das referências bibliográficas dos artigos (título, autor, periódico fonte, data, resumo e palavras chaves) e das referências dos documentos citados nos textos artigos (título, autor, fonte, data) que são disponibilizados pelo SciELO em acesso aberto com atribuição CC-BY.
Ao mesmo tempo, os metadados de todos os artigos indexados no SciELO, publicados nos últimos 10 anos, estão também armazenados e disponibilizados na base de dados do SciELO Citation Index na plataforma WoS e na base de dados Dimensions. Da mesma, forma estão disponíveis nas bases de dados Scopus e WoS os metadados dos artigos dos periódicos indexados por esta base.
O SciELO constitui portanto uma notável fonte de dados bibliométricos para o estudo das produções científicas dos países da Rede SciELO.
O escopo deste grupo de trabalho / workshop é compartilhar metodologias e tecnologias de acesso e exploração dos dados da base de dados SciELO, com destaque para a introdução ao uso de técnicas de ciência de dados com o concurso da linguagem Python, o acesso aos dados com a linguagem R com vistas a análises estatísticas e técnicas de acesso e uso dos dados das bases de dados SciELO Citation Index e Dimensions.
Paradoxical betweenness in Academic endeavors and research metricsSaptarshi Ghosh
Publish or perish" is an aphorism describing the pressure to publish academic work in order to succeed in an academic career. ... The pressure to publish has been cited as a cause of poor work being submitted to academic journals.
Bibliometrics in practice: how to generate reports for institutions.Torres Salinas
In an institutional context and at a professional level, one of our main tasks is to carry out bibliometric reports; actually these studies are essential because they are used by managers to make decisions (distribution of funds, recruitment of personnel, planning of research lines, …). In this talk we will explain how to make a global bibliometric report of an institution, we use as a case study the University of Granada. We focus in these topics. 1) General considerations: target, selection of indicators, objetives, …) 2) what sources of information can be used. 3) How to contextualize and interpret the indicators. 4) How to compare the results with other institutions (Benchmarking). 5) How to make graphs and tables. 6) dissemination of results and data
h index: Benchmark of productivity and impact of researcher AJAY SEMALTY
In the Indices of research series h index is discussed here. The h-index (sometimes called the Hirsch index or Hirsch number) is one of the several research indices which is used to measure the productivity and impact of of a researcher/ research group/ institution. It’s an index which increases on the basis of citations and number of papers continuously with the passage of time. It is the major benchmark used by the employers for selection/recruitment and/ or assessment of Researchers. This e-module will let you know all about the h index: What, How, Who, why......about h index will be answered here. In the very next video we will cover how to identify h index of a researcher in various platforms. (URL link for video: https://youtu.be/BAhPzxWVtVE) For any query please feel free to write to us at openknowledgeok@gmail.com and please do subscribe our youtube channel.......THANKS FOR GIVING YOUR TIME. --- Team OK
Similar to The Social Sciences & Humanities in the light of Google Scholar: tapping the bibliometric potential of an academic search engine (20)
Se describe la situación de las revistas españolas a través de los índices de citas de las Revistas españolas de ciencias sociales y jurídicas. Se señala cuales son los usos adecuados de dichos índices y las malas prácticas derivadas de su mal uso.
Conferencia impartida dentro de las III Jornadas Doctorales del Programa TIC de la Universidad de Jaen sobre la vida académica del doctorando. Se describen y comentan las principales actividades intelectuales que conforman el día al día de un doctorando: informarse, leer, indagar, escribir, publicar
Presentación utilizada en el curso de doctorado impartido en la Escuela de Doctorado de Humanidades, Ciencias Sociales y Jurídicas de la Universidad de Granada destinado a enseñar a los doctorandos cómo buscar y gestionar la bibliografía de su tesis. Los contenidos desarrollados son los siguientes: 1. La elaboración de una estrategia de búsqueda 2. Las fuentes de información I: las bases de datos bibliográficas de libros (Worldcat, Dialnet) 3. Las fuentes de información II: las bases de datos bibliográficas de artículos (Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar, ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection) 4. Cómo buscar información sobre un - Tema - Autor - Revista - Instituciones 5. Las alertas informativas: ¿cómo estar permanentemente informado? 6. ¿Cómo acceder a los documentos? 7. ¿Cómo descargar y exportar los resultados? 8. ¿Cómo y dónde guardar y organizar mi bibliografía, mis anotaciones y mis documentos? - My Library (Google Scholar) - Mendeley 9. ¿Cómo redactar las citas y referencias bibliográficas?
1.Metamorfosis en la comunicación y evaluación científica.
2.Estrategia general de comunicación:
a)DEPOSITAR documentos en los repositorios
b)CONSTRUIR identidad bibliográfica digital: Perfiles académicos
c)DIFUNDIR en redes sociales
3.Creación de perfiles académicos creados desde:
Bases de datos bibliográficas: ORCID, ResearcherID. Repositorios, tanto institucionales como temáticos (ej. REPEC).
Motores de búsqueda académicos: Google Scholar Citations. Redes sociales académicas: Academia.edu, ResearchGate, Mendeley.
Redes sociales profesionales: LinkedIn.
Servicios contenedores: ImpactStory, Scholar Mirrors
Los objetivos de este curso impartido en la Biblioteca de la Universidad Politecnica de Cataluña son
1. COMPRENDER los cambios en los modelos de comunicación y evaluación académica.
2. CONOCER distintas acciones y estrategias para mejorar la visibilidad académica online de una universidad a través de la visibilidad de sus investigadores.
3. CREAR y OPTIMIZAR perfiles académicos en la Web.
Sumario
1. Metamorfosis en la comunicación y evaluación científica.
2. Estrategia general de comunicación:
a)DEPOSITAR documentos en los repositorios
b)CONSTRUIR identidad bibliográfica digital: Perfiles académicos
c)DIFUNDIR en redes sociales
3.Creación de perfiles académicos creados desde:
Bases de datos bibliográficas: ORCID, ResearcherID.
Repositorios, tanto institucionales como temáticos (ej. REPEC).
Motores de búsqueda académicos: Google Scholar Citations.
Redes sociales académicas: Academia.edu, ResearchGate, Mendeley.
Redes sociales profesionales: LinkedIn.
Servicios contenedores: ImpactStory, Scholar Mirrors
Tras reflexionar sobre los cambios que se están produciendo en la comunicación científica (el paso de la galaxia gutenberg a la web) y en la evaluación científica (el paso de la bibliometrics a la webometrics y altmetrics) se repasan cuales son los nuevos espejos (plataformas) y metros (indicadores bibliométricos) utilizados para reflejar la actividad intelectual de los autores. Se hace hincapié en los servicios ofrecidos por Google Scholar y Researchgate concluyendo con una descripción de productos como Scholar Mirrors y Journal Scholar Metrics, ejemplos de la nueva bibliometría
Los objetivos de este curso son:
1. COMPRENDER los cambios en los modelos de comunicación y evaluación académica.
2, CONOCER distintas acciones y estrategias para mejorar la visibilidad académica online de una universidad a través de la visibilidad de sus investigadores.
3. CREAR y OPTIMIZAR perfiles académicos en la Web.
Se abordan los siguientes contenidos:
1. Metamorfosis en la comunicación y evaluación científica.
2. Estrategia general de comunicación:
- DEPOSITAR documentos en los repositorios
- CONSTRUIR identidad bibliográfica digital: Perfiles académicos
- DIFUNDIR en redes sociales
3. Creación de perfiles académicos creados desde:
- Bases de datos bibliográficas: ORCID, ResearcherID.
- Repositorios, tanto institucionales como temáticos (ej. REPEC).
- Motores de búsqueda académicos: Google Scholar Citations.
- Redes sociales académicas: Academia.edu, ResearchGate, Mendeley.
- Redes sociales profesionales: LinkedIn.
- Servicios contenedores: ImpactStory, Scholar Mirrors
1.- Importancia de Google Scholar.
2.- Fotografía general de Google Scholar
3.- Cómo hacer que nuestros documentos se indexen en Google Scholar
4.- Cómo crear y gestionar un perfil.
5.- Práctica: creando nuestro perfil
1. Necesidad evaluación rendimiento y calidad actividad investigadora: Tema polémico y trascendente
2. Evaluación actividad investigadora en España
- ¿Desde cuándo? Antecedentes
- ¿Para qué se evalúa?
- ¿Qué se evalúa?
- ¿Con qué criterios?
- ¿Cómo y quién evalúa?
- Controles
- Los resultados
- Los defectos
- Las consecuencias
- Las propuestas
La proliferación de rankings de universidades que se ha producido en las últimas décadas y su papel emergente en la evaluación de los sistemas universitarios justifícan el estudio de estos productos en los medios de masas para conseguir el objetivo de conocer sus repercusiones en la prensa.
Esta tesis se centra en un análisis descriptivo longitudinal retrospectivo de 1337 noticias publicadas sobre los siete rankings seleccionados para el estudio (que se indican mas adelante), en la edición impresa de 85 periódicos españoles de pago recogida por la base de datos MyNewsOnline® durante el periodo temporal 2004-2013.
El análisis permite conocer, entre otros aspectos: cual es medio que más noticias publica sobre rankings de universidades, qué ranking es el más citado en la prensa en ese periodo, que universidad es la más nombrada en los titulares; cuales son los recursos más usados en estas informaciones; o quienes son los firmantes de estos textos informativos.
Los resultados demuestran el creciente interés de los medios por estas herramientas científicas al registrar un incremento constante en el total de las informaciones publicadas durante el periodo analizado, que alcanza su punto álgido en el año 2013.
En esta ponencia se parte de la premisa de que confeccionar un ranking de universidades es una tarea muy similar a cocinar un plato. Tanto los resultados de uno como el sabor del otro dependen de los ingredientes empleados (dimensiones e indicadores), de la calidad de la materia prima (fuentes de datos), de la cocina y del cocinero (preparación y proporciones). Me propongo refl exionar sobre cada uno de estos aspectos con el fi n de que el consumidor de rankings se enfrente de forma crítica a la lectura e interpretación de las múltiples tablas y clasificaciones de Universidades que pululan por doquier en la actualidad.
In this brief assay we rest on the assumption that developing a ranking is somehow similar to cooking a dish. Both, the former’s results and the latter’s taste, depend on the ingredients we use (dimensions and indicators), the quality of the data (data source), the kitchen and the cook (preparation and proportions). I ponder over each of these aspects in order to prepare the consumers of rankings for a critical understanding and interpretation of the many university tables and classifi cation that currently swarm all around.
Curso sobre cómo crear y mantener perfiles bibliográficos en Google Scholar Citations: crear el perfil, difusión publicaciones, recibir alertas informativas, buscar información científica
Curso sobre cómo usar ResearchGate: crear el perfil, compartir datos y publicaciones, recibir alertas informativas, buscar información científica, buscar ofertas de trabajo científicas, conectar y seguir a otros científicos
Tras exponer las evidencias empíricas derivadas de la investigación sobre Google Scholar, que pueden seguirse en el blog http://googlescholardigest.blogspot.com/ se defiende que es posible elaborar productos bibliométricos a partir de Google Scholar. Se ha demostrado que Google Scholar es la base de datos científica de mayor tamaño y aquellas que es capaz de recuperar documentos producidos en cualquier lengua, país, tema y formato documental. Asimismo, se ha comprobado que somos capaces de recuperar los documentos altamente citados en Google Scholar y que existe una alta correlación entre los documentos indizados en Google Scholar y las bases de datos bibliográficas tradicionales.
A continuación se muestran los productos bibliométricos que se han generado para medir el impacto de autores, documentos, editoriales, revistas e instituciones. Estos son:
- H Index Scholar: muestra el índice h de 40.993 profesores
universitarios españoles de Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales.
- La Biblioteconomía y Documentación según Google Scholar Citations: indicadores bibliométricos de 400 autores españoles que trabajan en esta disciplina, e identificación de los documentos, editoriales y revistas más citadas según Google Scholar.
- Publishers Scholar Metrics: un índice bibliométrico que pretende medir el impacto de las editoriales de monografías científicas a partir del recuento de citas de los libros publicados por los profesores e investigadores de universidades públicas españolas indizados en Google Scholar hasta 2012 en el ámbito de las Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales. Se calcula el impacto de 1,782 editoriales. Los rankings de editoriales se presentan por disciplinas y especialidades científicas, (49 de Ciencias Sociales y Jurídicas y 39 de Arte y Humanidades).
- Índice H de revistas científicas españolas según Google Scholar Metrics. Se ofrece el índice h de unas 1000 revistas españolas que figuran indizadas en Google Scholar Metrics
- Journal Scholar Metrics: un portal bibliométrico donde puede encontrar el impacto científico de las revistas de Arte, Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales a partir del recuento de citas que ofrece Google Scholar Metrics. Se calcular el impacto de más de 10.000 revistas. Está en construcción
1. Metamorfosis en la comunicación y evaluación científica
2. Estrategia general de comunicación: incrementando la visibilidad e impacto de un científico en la Web:
- DEPOSITAR documentos en los repositorios
- CONSTRUIR identidad bibliográfica digital: Perfil en GSC, RG…
- DIFUNDIR en redes sociales
3. ¿Cómo crear y mantener mi perfil en Google Scholar Citations?
4. ¿Cómo crear y mantener mi perfil en ResearchGate?
5. ¿Cómo crear mi identificador ORCID?
6. Otras redes académicas
. ¿Qué es Google Scholar?
- Radiografía
- Fortalezas y debilidades
2. ¿Por qué usar Google Scholar?
3. ¿Cómo buscar información científica en Google Scholar? Estrategia de búsqueda
¿Qué información buscar? Sobre un tema, autor, revista, institución
4. ¿Cómo estar permanentemente informado? Las alertas informativas
5. ¿Cómo acceder a los documentos?
6. ¿Cómo guardar y organizar la información bibliográfica? Mi biblioteca
Los trabajos fin de Grado: definición y tipología. La estructura de un trabajo científico.
El trabajo de investigación: definición y estructura. IMRYD: Introducción, Material y Métodos, Resultados, Discusión y conclusiones.
El trabajo de revisión bibliográfica, definición y estructura: introducción, fuentes de información y metodología de búsqueda, resultados, conclusiones.
La memoria profesional, definición y estructura: introducción, la empresa, resultados, conclusiones.
La redacción: fases. Redacción del borrador, revisiones del borrador (contenido, estilo, presentación material).
¿Cómo escribir un artículo científico? Título, resumen, palabras clave, introducción, metodología, resultados, tablas, figuras, agradecimientos, citas y referencias bibliográficas.
Bridging the Digital Gap Brad Spiegel Macon, GA Initiative.pptxBrad Spiegel Macon GA
Brad Spiegel Macon GA’s journey exemplifies the profound impact that one individual can have on their community. Through his unwavering dedication to digital inclusion, he’s not only bridging the gap in Macon but also setting an example for others to follow.
Meet up Milano 14 _ Axpo Italia_ Migration from Mule3 (On-prem) to.pdfFlorence Consulting
Quattordicesimo Meetup di Milano, tenutosi a Milano il 23 Maggio 2024 dalle ore 17:00 alle ore 18:30 in presenza e da remoto.
Abbiamo parlato di come Axpo Italia S.p.A. ha ridotto il technical debt migrando le proprie APIs da Mule 3.9 a Mule 4.4 passando anche da on-premises a CloudHub 1.0.
Italy Agriculture Equipment Market Outlook to 2027harveenkaur52
Agriculture and Animal Care
Ken Research has an expertise in Agriculture and Animal Care sector and offer vast collection of information related to all major aspects such as Agriculture equipment, Crop Protection, Seed, Agriculture Chemical, Fertilizers, Protected Cultivators, Palm Oil, Hybrid Seed, Animal Feed additives and many more.
Our continuous study and findings in agriculture sector provide better insights to companies dealing with related product and services, government and agriculture associations, researchers and students to well understand the present and expected scenario.
Our Animal care category provides solutions on Animal Healthcare and related products and services, including, animal feed additives, vaccination
2.Cellular Networks_The final stage of connectivity is achieved by segmenting...JeyaPerumal1
A cellular network, frequently referred to as a mobile network, is a type of communication system that enables wireless communication between mobile devices. The final stage of connectivity is achieved by segmenting the comprehensive service area into several compact zones, each called a cell.
The Social Sciences & Humanities in the light of Google Scholar: tapping the bibliometric potential of an academic search engine
1. The Social Sciences & Humanities in the
light of Google Scholar:
tapping the bibliometric potential of an
academic search engine
Alberto Martín-Martín & Emilio Delgado López-Cózar
Facultad de Comunicación y Documentación
Universidad de Granada (Spain)
COST TD1210 workshop:
Alternative metrics or tailored metrics? Science dynamics
for science policy
Warsaw 9-10 November 2016
9. Indicators
Extracted
directly from
Google Scholar
Metrics
Computed using the article and
citation data available in Google
Scholar Metrics
H Index of
documents
published in the
last 5 years
Median of
citation counts
for articles
published in last
5 years
Sum of
citations for
articles above
h5-index
threshold
11. Coverage
IMPORTANT: Google Scholar Metrics
only covers journals that are indexed in
Google Scholar, have published at
least 100 articles in the last 5-year
period, and have received at least 1
citation
Polish journals: JSM: 152 / 9196 (1.6%); SJR: 69 / 8180 (0.8%); WoS: 13 / 4166 (0.3%)
12. Future plans for JSM
• Update indicators annually: a more current version of
Google Scholar Metrics (GSM) is already available
• Update journal detail page to show evolution of impact
through time
• Switch to data from Google Scholar (search engine) to
get data for journals not in GSM: even better coverage
• Replace current journal classification scheme with
article-level classification (maybe using reference
and/or citing articles)
• Computing author self-citations (better metadata is
needed), distribution of citations by journal (to detect
closely related journals, or potential citation cartels)…
13.
14.
15. • Aims to measure impact of scientific book publishers
based on citations
• Sample of highly cited books (top 3%) published by
~41k A&H and SS professors working in public Spanish
universities. Data collected from Google Scholar in
2012 (n ~ 7200)
• 68 discipline rankings (49 in Social Sciences and Law,
39 in Arts and Humanities)
16. Indicators: Nº of books, and
sum of citations (relative to
highest element in the ranking)
17.
18.
19. • Publication data about 4,993 A&H and SS professors
working in public Spanish universities was extracted
from Google Scholar in 2012
• Only authors in the first tercile are displayed
• 68 discipline rankings (49 in Social Sciences and Law,
39 in Arts and Humanities)
23. LIS researchers
in Spain
336 authors in GSC
68 not in GSC
Other sources
ResearcherID (WoS)
ResearchGate
Indicators
Sum of citations
H Index
Nº of documents
RG Score
Impact Points
Aggregating data
Highly cited docs (HCD),
% of HCD by journal,
book publisher, and
institution
24. The «Mirrors» approach
There are many platforms that reflect (mirror) scientific
activity on the Web. An inclusive study of the impact of
scientific activity must contemplate as many of them as
possible.
25.
26. Why Google Scholar?
• Best overall coverage: no country, language, or
document type restrictions, which is necessary for
good coverage of A&H and SS
• Most densely populated citation graph in
existence
• If we only consider documents covered by
WoS, Google Scholar data for those
documents tell the same story
• Free (as in free beer)
27. Why Google Scholar?
• Sample of 64,000 highly cited documents in
Google Scholar: half are covered by WoS,
half aren’t (among which we can find many
books)
• PRELIMINARY RESULTS: Analysis of most
articles and reviews published in 2009
covered by Web of Science (~1 million
documents):
Citation Index N spearman.cor p.value prop.cited.gs prop.cited.wos ratio of gs_cit to wos_cit (avg)
Sciences 863801 0,94 0,00 0,97 0,95 1,68
Social Sciences 109232 0,90 0,00 0,97 0,94 2,58
Art & Humanities 13487 0,83 0,00 0,84 0,69 2,52
29. ¿± 10%?
Errors in the data
Enough quality?
Even with «dirty» data,
it measures more and
better
Large units of analysis: no
problem
Individuals: check data first