The Scientific Method Of Everyday Life Essay

The Scientific Method Of Everyday Life Essay
Scientific method in everyday life:– Science plays an important part in our life. We have used science from stone age. Man observes and understands
what he observes. This is a unique sense that he is born with.
Agriculture is a scientific process. The man has learnt to sow seeds, water the land, add green manure to the soil and reap the harvest. Separating
the paddy from the husk shows how clever he is. You might have observed that the women hold the pounded paddy in a flat plate and sift when the
breeze blows. The heavy paddy falls near the person 's feet while the husk that is light flies and falls a few feet away. Thus paddy is separated from
the husk. Man also has learnt from observation that the crops should be rotated to get back the lost nutrients of the soil. This is one of the scientific
method we observe in everyday life.
Gardening:– Man knows how to garden by observation. He knows that the sunlight and water are necessary for the seeds to germinate. He has
learnt by experience that the soil should be rich for the plants to grow. He also has observed that the seed must be healthy to germinate. Man also
has learnt from experience that diseased seed produce diseased plants. Hence he first checks the seed to see if it is healthy. The Chinese way to
check the seed is to soak the seed that is selected for planting in salt water. If the seed floats on the water, it is discarded. If the seed goes to the
bottom of the vessel, then it is healthy and can be used for
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Scientific Notation Essay
Scientific Notation
Essential question: How can you use scientific notation to express numbers of different quantities?
Scientific notation is a method of writing or displaying numbers in terms of a decimal number between 1 and 10, which is multiplied by a power of 10
Ex. Step 1 – 3 105 First, you would solve for the exponents Step 2 – 3 100000 Then, you would multiply the factors that are left Step 3 – 300000
Lastly, you get your answer
Essential Answer: Scientific Notation can be used to express different quantities by reducing a large or small number into a short mathematical sentence.
Integers
Essential Question: Why are using integers easier than a...show more content...
How to find a 3D figures Volume
Essential Question: What figures does volume apply to?
Volume is the amount of 3–dimensional space an object occupies. In the equations for volume, B means area of the bases and h means distance
between the bases. Remember to always add the cubed sign at the end of your answer ( # unit3).
Ex. Find the volume of a figure that is 5 in. long, 7 in. wide, and 8 in. tall. Step 1– V = BhFirst, find the equation for the figure.
Step 2– V = (35)8Then, find the base and substitute.
Step 3– V = 280 in3Lastly, solve for V.
Essential Answer: It applies to only 3D figures.
How to find a 3D figures Surface Area
Essential Question: How is finding surface area different than finding volume?
Surface area is the total area of the surface of a three–dimensional object. For surface area, the equation is SA = Ph + 2B. P stands for the perimeter of
the base. The h stands for the distance between the bases. B stands for area of the bases.
Ex. Find the volume of a box that is 2 feet long, 4 feet wide, and 3 feet

Environmental Science Essay
Environmental Fundamentals
Laura Jackson
Env/100
April 8, 2013
JOHN ENSWORTH
Environmental Fundamentals
Introduction
Environmental science is defined as the study of the environment and the interconnecting systems it contains, furthermore, the way people interact with
their natural surroundings and use natural resources (wise geek, 2013). Scientist in this field is highly interdisciplinary and extremely diverse, for
example, a scientist might study volcanoes or climate change. This essay will cover the following; the definition of environmental science, the
relationship between science and technology and how it affects environmental problems; the concept of environmental sustainability and why it should
be studied; how human...show more content...
Environmental Sustainability
Environmental sustainability is the process of making sure current processes of interaction with the environment are pursued with the idea of keeping
the environment as pristine as naturally possible based on ideal–seeking behavior (Wikipedia, 2010). What makes environmental sustainability so
important is that it demands that society designs activities to meet human needs while indefinitely preserving the life support systems of the planet
(Wikipedia, 2010). Human consumption can only use the nature's resources at a rate that can be replenished naturally.
Human Values affecting Society
The most devastating environmental change of all is the loss of biodiversity. The rate of species extinction has remained at one species per million per
year, furthermore, the accelerating destruction of habitats throughout the world leads to projections of the loss of two–thirds of all species on earth by
the end of this century, and millions of years to recover from the Cretaceous period (mindfully.org, 2013). As individuals, we obtain our food, directly
or indirectly from plants, for example, plant our primary use of medicines. Biodiversity also determines the properties of communities and ecosystems,
which capture energy from the sun. The world is less resilient, more homogeneous, less interesting, and with fewer opportunities for our descendants

and ourselves: where the process reaches

Scientific Theory Essay
Scientific Theory
A scientific theory is a well–substantiated explanation of some aspects of the natural world, based on a body of knowledge that has been repeatedly
confirmed through observation and experiment. Scientist creates scientific theories from hypothesis that have been corroborated through the scientific
method, then gather evidence to test their accuracy. The strength of a scientific theory is related to the diversity of phenomena it can explain, which is
measured by its ability to make falsifiable predictions with respect to the phenomena. Scientific theories are the most reliable, rigorous, and
comprehensive for of scientific knowledge.
The scientific method involves the proposal and testing of hypotheses, by deriving...show more content...
Theories are the main goal in science and no explanation can achieve a higher rank. (to the belief that "theories" become "laws" over time). In some
cases, theories can unify. Two or more theories can be replaces by a single theory which explains the previous theories as approximations or special
cases, comparable to the way a theorys is connecting explanation for many confirmed hypotheses: This is reffered to as Unification of Theories. Both
scientific laws and scientific theories are produced from scientific methods through the formation and testing of hypotheses, and can predict the
behavior of the natural world. Both are typically supported by observation and experimental science. However, scientific laws are descriptive accounts
of how nature will behave under certain conditions. Scientific theories are broader in scope, and give overarching explanations of how nature works
and why it exhibits certain characteristics. They are supported by evidence from many different sources, and may contain one or more laws.
Both scientific laws and scientific theories come from the scientific method through the formation and testing of hypotheses, and can predict the
behavior of the natural world. Both are usually well supported by observations and/or experimental evidence. However laws are descriptive accounts of
how nature will behave under certain conditions. Assumption is a

The Scientific Method Essay
The Scientific Method is the standardized procedure that scientists are supposed to follow when conducting experiments, in order to try to construct a
reliable, consistent, and non–arbitrary representation of our surroundings. To follow the Scientific Method is to stick very tightly to a order of
experimentation. First, the scientist must observe the phenomenon of interest. Next, the scientist must propose a hypothesis, or idea in which the
experiments will be based around. Then, through repeated experimentation, the hypothesis can either be proven false or become a theory. If the
hypothesis is proven to be false, the scientist must reformulate his or her ideas and come up with another hypothesis, and the experimentation begins
again. This...show more content...
Furthermore, flies were observed laying eggs where the maggots formed. Thus, he concluded that maggots are the result of flies, not spontaneous
generation. He then called the principles behind his experiment "Metodo Scientifico" or The Scientific Method.
The first cases of what would be considered properly using the Scientific Method can be found earlier, though, back in the studies of Galileo, early
in the 17th century. He first observed that heavy objects gain speed as they fall. He then proposed, or hypothesized, that the rate of falling of massive
objects was proportional to the distance that the object has fallen. Following the Scientific Method, he tested his hypothesis and found it to be false,
since objects falling unequal distances do not fall in the same amount of time, as his hypothesis led to. Since his hypothesis failed, he made a new one,
which proposed that the rate at which an object falls is directly proportional to the time the object has spent falling. This was tested by rolling balls
down an inclined plane and calculating the speed and time values from those observations. Later, these experiments led to the discovery of the
gravitational constant g, and a better understanding of the Scientific Method.
The Method has been used many times since Galileo conducted his experiments, and it has been considered a valid way of conducting experiments since

Scientific Method Step Essay
Scientific Method Matching Exercise Resource
In Part I, match each example from Column 2 with the correct step of the scientific method in Column 1. Explain the reasoning for your choice in Part
II.
Part I
Column 1: Scientific Method Steps
__g_ Observe
__c_ Ask a question
__a_ Create a hypothesis
__b_ Conduct an experiment
__d_ Collect data
__f_ Interpret results
__e_ Report results
Column 2: Examples of Tasks
1)
a) A scientist, based on hisobservation of the pond, believes that if a pond is exposed to the waste of an industrial plant, then the growth of algae will
be accelerated.
2)
b) In her laboratory, a scientist pours a vial of waste water, collected from the industrial plant, and adds it to a dish containing pond water. A
...show
more content...
Information that is gathered and analyzed by the collection of information investigated. Why, when, what, and how does the information work or does
not work.
3) The "Examples of Tasks" I selected for theScientific Method Step: "Create a hypothesis" is accurate because:

The creation of a hypothesis are the answers of the questions that are formulated through why, when, what, and how. This an educated guess based on
the observation and questions asked during the observation and questions asked.
4) The "Examples of Tasks" I selected for the Scientific Method Step: "Conduct an experiment" is accurate because:
Conducting experiment, is when the scientist have questions they want answers to, also wanting to know how things work. This will mean to finding
out the facts or to come up with a new theory.
5) The "Examples of Tasks" I selected for the Scientific Method Step: "Collect data" is accurate because: As the observation of algae, the
information must be recorded as how it is seen. The information that is collected during the process of the experiment, are not to be altered from what
is observed. This is a recording of all of what has been viewed at the time of growth, color or any changes.
6) The "Examples of Tasks" I selected for the Scientific Method Step: "Interpret results" is accurate because:
Interpret results, is

Reflection Paper On Science And Science
Reflection Statement Before taking this course, I had never questioned how to characterize science. In elementary school I was taught that "good"
science experiments use the scientific method so that they are replicable. I had always seen science as a source of reliable information. I certainly
questioned certain findings, but I held the belief that there was such a thing as "good science." I thought that "good science" transcended any
subjectivity and was indisputable. These notions I had were called into question in Anthropology of Science. We started by looking into the history of
science. Throughout lectures, we studied epistemology and different trends in scientific discovery. These classroom lectures were complemented with
discussions of Thomas Kuhn and other scholars, such as Emily Martin and Michael Carrithers, who have theorized about scientific research. During that
time, I personally began deconstructing my image of science being on a pedestal when it comes to scholarly findings. I acknowledged that there
were ways for culture to influence science. When I read the assigned ethnographies God's Laboratory and Alien Ocean by Elizabeth Roberts and
Stefan Helmreich, respectively, I was able to see exactly how clearly the theories about science were visible when anthropologists studied scientific
communities. The connections were even more visible to me when we got to apply the theories ourselves through our Ethnography of Science class
project. As a class, we

Science Essay
For some people science is the supreme form of all knowledge. Is this view reasonable or does it involve a misunderstanding of science or of
knowledge?
For many persons science is considered the supreme form of all knowledge, as science is based on facts and theories and it reaches its results through
an approved scientific method. Consequently, it seems to be objective and thus more truthful and reliable. However, other persons argue that this is a
misunderstanding of science. Hence, one should question what science and knowledge entail. Can there actually be some form of knowledge that
overrules all other types of human knowledge? Is scientific knowledge actually always objective? Are there other types of knowledge of equal worth?
This...show more content...
Thus, perception, in this case could be considered an important factor that makes a piece of knowledge supreme. One could then deduce that frogs have
these organs and that most multi–cellular animals also have these organs, after having looked and compared a large sample. This is where reasoning,
as a way of knowing, comes into use to make generalisations. And one can be quite sure that this fact is true since it has been seen, and at any moment
in time, if someone dissects a frog, he/she will see these organs. In this example, there is very little room for human emotions/ bias to affect the
perception, since one cannot argue that what's inside the frog's body is something other than its organs.
On the other hand, there are other parts in the field of biology that are less supreme. Consider the example of a field study where a scientist is to
investigate if leaves closer to the trunk of oak trees in Scania are larger than those being further away from the trunk. The biologist will make a plan
on how to conduct the experiment, and since he cannot measure all leaves in all trees existing in Scania, the biologist will have to carry out the field
study on a sample, which raises the question: what could be an appropriate sample? Most scientists agree that the best way to conduct a field study is
being as random as possible. But how does one go about being random? Scientist may have different ways of reasoning on what would make an
appropriate sample, but no way

My Passion For Science
My passion for science and plants began early in my childhood and has grown substantially to that which energizes me to chase after higher goals.
I used to obsessively search for information on wild plants that were edible and had medicinal properties. Now, I find that I am continually amazed
by research on the photosynthetic pathway along with biochemistry within plants in general. I was, and still am, enthralled by the idea that so
much knowledge and novelty is within the organisms that I had appreciated since I was young. I believe that this passion was driven further by
being able to compare, for myself, a life spent in remedial labor and one with scientific exploration. Needing to work in my family's business for
years out of necessity placed me in a position where I saw how each action could either draw me from or towards a better lifestyle. These experiences
have personally shown me the value in a program like the Leadership Alliance, whose purpose offers a means to be a part of a diverse cohort striving
toward leadership in the world. Having the opportunity to be included in a community with such a goal and momentum would be phenomenal. It would
allow me to continue pursuing graduate and post–graduate level education while also refining me into a monumental force in the field of scientific
research. I desire to pursue my passion of photosynthesis, plants, and biochemistry to serve the world with a team of researchers. An academic
appreciation and respect of science

scientific literacy Essay
Scientific literacy
Introduction and audience
When talk about science, perhaps majority of us think it is less relative with real life. However, as society developed, science encompassed us
everywhere. This situation forces everyone to acquire the ability to learn and understand science. Some may think that, scientific literacy is what a
scientist should have and nothing about normal people, however it is just too narrow. Look around the surroundings of us, everything is conned with
science. Also, we encounter science in our normal life as well. Therefore, the ability to acquire and understand science is necessary and important,
which is called scientific literacy. Scientific literacy is the foundation of science and technology...show more content...
Also, they might doubt the ingredient of their product (thinking creatively). What were they made of, would that influence their health? Finally, we
made the decision, it was a deceptive advertising and we wouldn't purchase it(problem solved). This is the one typical example process of using
scientific way to solve problems.
So far, we could tell scientific literacy is useful, but does it necessary for us? The next part is telling why it is necessary and the basic science
knowledge to acquire it.
Science knowledge is necessary
As the rapid development of science and technology, everyone in society is required to acquire higher scientific literate skill. What if one doesn't
acquire scientific literacy, not only he/she could not engage in science study or research, but would encounter difficulties in normal life. For
example, when we want to look for a book in the library, it would be so simply if we check it online, copy the index of the book and then go find it
directly. However, people who don't have the ability to acquire computer skill would have difficult. Therefore, scientific literacy is necessary in
contemporary life.
There is no doubt that science knowledge is the significant part of scientific literacy. Therefore, learning science is the first step. What is science? Just
taking a look at our surroundings, it not hard to find that science is everywhere. Simply example like how the lamp is lighted, which

The Impacts of Science on Human Life Essay
Technology is evolving and scientists are frequently developing new concepts and theories, improving our life style and making the world ultimately a
better place to live in. Science has led to many extraordinary inventions, filling our human mind with vast amount of knowledge and intelligence. For
example, many types of new planets have been discovered recently. Although people have been living in the world for a very long time, it is quite
recent that these planets have been discovered using telescope and other mechanisms. These newly found planets are identical to earth and believed to
be supporting life, which I have found interesting. However, without the contributions of technology, it would have never been possible. Moreover,
...show more content...
For example, Malaysia was not a very wealthy country economically but the improvements of technology have helped their financial system in a quite
extensive level. In the past, they were not stable in a financial system until the effects of complex machinery and the contributions of modern
technology have rationalized their economy. In the essay, The Enchanted Forest, Bill Reid, the author, also supports this point by saying, "We all
carried ashore with us the knowledge that the wave of technological assault that had begun on the other island and changed most of the continent"(Reid
319).Basically, Bill states that how technology has changed most of North America several ways. In addition, this quote is related to the essay because
it illustrates how impotent science and technology is, in terms of rationalizing our economy. In view of these aspects, I would say most people would
agree that it has indeed made our world a better place.
Most importantly, the contributions of science and technology have made our lives more delightful. In our everyday life, we use many ordinary
things, which have been modified through improvements. These simple inventions have modernized the way we do things given that most people are
generally depended upon them. For example, a cell phone is considered as an important item due the service it provides. In the past, when cell phone
was not invented, people had to go all the way to the person's place in order to deliver the

Is Psychology a Science? Essay
The British Psychological Society states that 'Psychology is the scientific study of people, the mind and behaviour' (BPS). In this essay I will be
discussing what is actually meant by this and whether psychology fits into both the traditional views of a science, as well as more contemporary
perspectives. It is widely suggested that Psychology is a "coalition of specialities" meaning it is multi–disciplinary (Hewstone, Fincham and Foster
2005, page 4). I will therefore examine whether it could be considered wrong to think that all parts of the discipline should neatly fit into one view of
a scientific approach. In order to be considered a science, Psychology must consequently adhere to using a scientific method. If this were, as usual,
Studies such as the afore mentioned Milgram study showed that what may appear to be the most expected outcome may, in truth, be very different. I
would also go on to argue that in actuality all sciences are some adaptation of common sense (Oppenheimer, 1956), leaving Psychology in this way, no
different to any of the others. Ben Goldacre even argues that particular forms of science, such as neuroscience, regularly offer empirically incorrect
research in reputable journals, claiming statistically significant results without the appropriate statistical tests (Guardian). Furthermore, there are three
main aspects which were customarily associated with a science: metaphysical, theoretical and methodological assumptions. Under metaphysical it is
believed that to gain scientific status requires the certainty that the subject matter i.e. human thought/ behaviour, is similar to that of other accepted
sciences. This could then be true for Psychology, as particularly since Darwin's suggestion of a continuity between behaviours of humans and other
species, behaviour has become more scrutinised. However, this must be assumed in respect of determinism, suggesting predictions could be made.
'Heisenbergs uncertainty principle' suggests that when relating evidence of indeterminism within the universe to human behaviour, it proves
ambiguous, and with parts of the discipline believing strongly in free will it seems difficult to establish a common ground (Valentine E.R. page 2).

Human Science And Natural Science
Disagreement may aid the pursuit of knowledge in the natural and human sciences because disagreement leads to new discoveries. Disagreement is
about gathering reliable knowledge as well as using this newfound knowledge, and occurs when a group fails to reach a consensus over the logic of an
argument. Knowledge is composed of facts, information, and skills acquired by a person through experience or education. Two areas of knowledge that
are impacted by disagreement are human science and natural science. Human science is the study of human behavior and how humans gather
information. Natural science is a branch of science that deals with the physical world. In order for a disagreement to occur, one must be familiar with
the subject and have his or her own prediction that is different from the norm. Therefore, to advance knowledge in the areas of human and natural
science, people must disagree. The roles of logic, reason, and emotion will be investigated to see how they are used to help gain new knowledge in
both human and natural science. Many knowledge claims in human and natural science are based on theories. Jean Lamarck proposed the theory of
evolution in 1801. The theory of evolution proposed by Lamarck was based on the idea that organisms had to change their behavior to survive. For
instance, if a giraffe stretched it neck for a long period of time to reach the leaves as the top of the tree, then a "nervous fluid" would flow in the neck
and make it longer. Thus, its

Ethics in Science Essay
What do you think of when you hear or see the word "science"; test tubes, Einstein, Space? Science is "generally taken as meaning either (a) the exact
sciences, such as chemistry, physics, etc., or (b) a method of thought which obtains verifiable results by reasoning logically from observed fact"
(Orwell). Scientists are those who study science by scientific method. These "men of science", which Orwell describes as "a biologist, and astronomer,
perhaps a psychologist or a mathematician", "work by means of induction and deduction, and that by the help of these operations, they, in a sort of
sense, wring from Nature certain other things, which are called natural laws, and causes, and that out of these, by some cunning skill of their own,
This undoubtedly demonstrations the pros and cons of inventions made through science. There are people who abuse medicine, and other creations
from science, for numerous different reasons. Things like guns and nuclear weapons were formed to protect, but with the downside of killing
others. With all of this this being said, should there be a limit to things we make? More importantly, does science have an ethical responsibility to
humanity? I think to answer that question, we need to start with deciding if scientists have an ethical responsibility to humanity. As the saying goes,
with knowledge comes power and with power comes responsibility. However, there can be no limitation on the knowledge obtained from science.
Instead, we must limit what arises from knowledge and power. What are some responsibilities of scientists and the rest of the population? Well, to
start on the broadest sense, science should only be used for the absolute necessary improvement of humanity. It is our ethical responsibility to not
take advantage of science to further the advancement of military power, as we have done with the creation of atomic and nuclear bombs. Is it
responsible to use science for fame, fortune and glory? No, and it is not acceptable, but it is common for people to do so. If, for some reason, we had
the option to save 80% of endangered wildlife through scientific means, but with the consequence of harming the atmosphere, would it be ethical to
continue on? We would have

Scientific Method in Real Life Essay
Scientific method paper
Part I. It was the finals of the 2004 swimming state championships. I was seated second in the 100–yard individual breaststroke. My heart was
pounding as I swam my warm up laps. I would have to drop about a second or so to have any shot at the title and the gold. I hopped out of the
warm up pool, and headed over to grab my towel and work out a strategy plan with my coach. The first order of business was to address the main
problem. I needed to win. My coach had gathered information on my competition. We knew her best personal times, the way she trained, and how
much she had rested for this meet. From all of this info being hurriedly spoken to in my ear, as I made my way to the blocks, enabled me to...show more
content...
Then it was time to test the hypothesis, make an experimental design, and make our observations. I made my move on the third lap, and ended up
winning the race. Here the actual race was the experimental design, from which my coach and I were able to make the observations that sense I
won, our hypothesis was indeed correct. We could have made a graph showing all the racers in the race if we would have liked. We then were able to
support the hypothesis, and also publish any types of results we would have liked. My personnel experience coincides with the scientific method all the
way through. We unknowingly pretty much did all of the steps in the scientific method on our own accord. The ones left out such as the graphs were
not necessary for my specific problem.
Part II. I am currently dealing with the problem of cooking a salmon dinner for my boyfriend. I am a good cook, and really good baker, but I am
not as familiar nor as comfortable using the grill. This would be my problem. I need to do a good job grilling salmon for him for our anniversary
dinner. So I first need to identify the problem at hand, which is needing to cook a successful meal. Next, the scientific method states that I need to
collect information on how to accomplish this task. I went to the local bookstore and bought a book on ways to grill your favorite foods. Now it
would be time for me to form my hypothesis. My hypothesis is that if I grill the salmon for 20 minutes on 450

Scientific Writing Proposal
I propose to study in technical writing in scientific field, to learning effective science writing. The metaphor of context as rhetorical situation may
understate the power that context has to shape scientific discourse. The observed study of the scientific process can be challenging, but it will provide
you with better perception of how is the scientific process in writing. The rhetorical role of scientific discourse have can create in persuasive scientific,
narrative, emotional appeals, and innovations of imagination. Technical writing in certain field is how we write to communicate in unique language to
communicate to audience within community and to other beyond scientific community. The significance of utilizing special language will enhance
Interview from others student can be useful data to claim the importance of how scientific writing shapes us in educational system. The first step I
would manage my bibliography and literature view as center of activity. Over the time the lists of articles read and cited becomes significant works.
For applying bibliography from peer–reviewed, books and other sources allow me to generate more concepts. Using Mendeley as a tool to generate
bibliographies, and annotation of texts, also encourage communication between scientists around the sharing of references. Technology currently
impact on my ability to work. Useful data on how scientific writing using language to communicate between scientific community and outside the
community for exchange common interests, and their requirements to work as scientific platform. In order to make the content interesting to audience;
visual aid including maps, charts, graphs, and photographs will helps audiences comprehend the reading much better than the plain contexts. Using
proofread from writing center and peers may reduce chance of getting confuse words: heat has an effect on the reaction and heat affects the

Essay about The Importance of a Science Education
Getting a science education in the 21st century can be very beneficial to children of all ages. Science is what makes up the world and the only way
you would be able to know that would be by getting a real education in the studies of science. There are many reasons in why getting an education in
science can be important and three of them are that it makes you smarter, it increases your awareness of diseases going around in the world, and
getting a proper education in science can inspire kids to be scientists themselves. Receiving an education in science is good for children of all ages.
First of all, educational studies in science can really make a student more wise or sharp. When studying science, a person can learn about many things
Everybody goes to school to extend their knowledge, but studying science helps kids understand the world. To emphasize, science can simply make you
more intelligent. In addition to that, learning science can also inform children of all ages about what is going on in the world. This includes diseases
such as AIDS, H1N1, and diabetes. It is important to get an education so that kids know what to be aware of in the outside world. Getting an education
in science can benefit a student more than by alerting them of diseases in the world. Educational science can also tell kids about environmental topics
such as global warming and recycling.. We all need to know about problems on the planet such as these, and what better place than school. "People
everywhere should be aware of the fact that everyday we are corrupting the environment or spreading a disease. (www.grinningplanet.com/6001
/environmental–quotes.htm, John Mckonnel)" It is for this reason that children need to have a good science education. Knowing we are in the 21st
century, things get more complicated, including diseases, and finding a cure gets harder with it. Having children study science in schools can get them
aware of what is happening. Lastly, studying science during a person's childhood years can inspire them to become real scientists themselves so they
can deal with issues that are effecting the world. Becoming a scientist can help the

Roland Barthes claims that, "Literature is the question minus the answer." This applies to Frankenstein by Mary Shelley when she begs the question:
when does scientific exploration becomes questionable and enters into an area of dangerous knowledge/creation? As Barthes states, Shelley proposes
the question, but never directly answers it. Throughout the novel Shelley uses Victor Frankenstein as the basis for most of her examples, because he
made the monster. Within the novel Shelley poses this question when Frankenstein is explaining his science experiments and the processes he goes
through to create the monster. In this section Shelley is prompting the question that she never truly gives the answer to. How far is too far with...show
more content...
The way he describes the final creation of this monster to which he dedicates his whole life trying to create. It exemplifies how much of a toll this
took on Victor because he begins to see that maybe it is not the best idea to create the monster, which he describes as a demoniacal corpse. Once
again Shelley does not explicitly say whether this experiment that took such a toll on Victor is too far in terms of how much it adversely affects
Victor. She only provides the examples of how sick and weak he is when he finishes creating the monster, which she does to explain that it it might not
be good to potentially harm yourself for science. After he describes the monster as such he then says that he is the one who had so miserably given the
monster life. Victor is not referring to the monster as miserable in this explanation, but he is referring to the grueling amount of time that he spent and
how much of a miserable effect creating the monster had on him. This is Shelley's explanation and introduction to what Victor did, which she follows
with displaying the effects of what he creates, the monster, and possibly providing an answer to Barthes' question. Shelley does not directly answer this
question but she does provide some insight due to the actions of the monster and Victor throughout the remainder of the novel. Right after Victor's
creation of the monster

Essay On Scientific Method
The Scientific Method
In the article understanding "Science and How it Really Works", It becomes apparent that the Scientific Method is much more involved and dynamic
than simply forming a Hypothesis, making observations, conducting an experiment and forming a conclusion based on the data collected. While these
processes are the backbone they don't necessarily always follow one another in a sequence and there is much more involved in each step than one may
perceive from the simple list.
Generally speaking the Scientific Method begins with an observation that allows you to form a hypothesis. In order to come up with a well informed
hypothesis one can look through scientific journals that may lend some light onto the subject your thinking of investigating. Sometimes talking with
peers or discovering new tools on the market that allow you to look at things differently than before can be inspirational and lead to observations that
then allow you to form a hypothesis.
A hypothesis is a...show more content...
Good experiments that produce reliable data generally have some factors to consider. The sample size and whether it is a good representation of the
"universe" you are considering. Are there any biases in the way in which the samples are selected? In other words is it random and does everything
within your "universe" have an equal chance of being selected in your sample? If you are testing the effects of certain drugs for example is there a
control group that is not receiving the treatment? Last but not least, can the experiment be repeated by others? Conducting a good experiment may be
the most difficult part of the scientific method. Often times there are constraints that don't allow you to perform the perfect experiment. This may
include budget limits, ethical considerations, of the inability to control other factors that may influence your

The Scientific Method Of Everyday Life Essay

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Similar to The Scientific Method Of Everyday Life Essay

Similar to The Scientific Method Of Everyday Life Essay (8)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

The Scientific Method Of Everyday Life Essay