M &Amp; M Scientific Method

M & M Scientific Method
M&M Investigation Lab
Kayla Prendergast
Audrey Hutchison, Cara Self
Mrs. Dirrigl
8–11–16
Introduction: This M&M investigation served as a useful tool to the students. This investigationtaught the students how to use the scientific method,
and act how scientists would. This investigation also gave the students the opportunity to learn how to write a lab report from and experiment
/investigation done in class.
Purpose: The purpose of this investigation is to learn how to write a proper lab report and how to use the scientific method with the use of M&M's.
Prediction: It was predicted that each package of M&M's would contain the same number of candies.
Materials:
package of M&M's (47.9 g)
paper towel
paper
pencil
Methods:
1.Place paper towel on lab table.
2.Place package of M&M's on paper towel.
3.Carefully open the M&M package, and display its contents on the paper towel.
4.Separate the M&M's by color, and count the number in each group. Record data.

5.Count the total of all M&M's. Record data.
6....show more content...
The results did not support the prediction. There were different amounts of M&M's in each bag, but the overall average was approximately 56
candies per bag. There were more orange M&M's, and brown M&M's were found the least. An average of 9.2 green, 12.2 blue, 6.8 red, and 8.2
yellow M&M's were found as well. One further study would include a comparison of M&M's and a similar candy like Skittles to see if skittles have
the same number of candies in each bag, and compare the two. Another study would include an investigation similar to this one. It would run the same
investigation but compare the previous study to the current one and see if the average numbers are relatively
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Value of Science Essay
3/14/2013
Values
Science is undoubtedly a very important part of growing as the human race. It has improved our lives drastically from the first stone tools, to iPods
and cars we drive. But what is it really that matters when it comes to science? Material things are not the only things that science gives humanity.
Richard Feynman explains his point of view of the values of science, and on how science is used to create things beneficial and afflicting, how the
values behind science are affected by society, and how science affects people. The very first point brought up ismorality. Science is not morally
oriented to do good or bad and can easily do either. Feynman referenced a Buddhist proverb he heard while visiting Honolulu, "To...show more content...
For example, recently we had a large hoopla about stem cell research because of the supposed "farming babies". When in reality, the stem cells were
in vitro fertilized eggs from artificially inseminated parents that would have been thrown away. Those extra fertilized eggs contained cells that have the
capability of creating any cell in the human body, and with the future possibility of growing replacement/repair body parts of patients; it would have
been a huge leap in the medical field. But because of our own ignorance to the science behind it, we effectively closed the continuum of scientific
progress. Feynman wrote a small poetic section putting into perspective how great and complicated humans are, but showing how miniscule they are
compared to the universe. Also, how it is a "religious experience" to have you put into perspective through science itself. He says that artists and singers
won't sing about it because not everyone can understand the science, but the scientists who can explain it.
The last value of science is the methodology behind being a scientist. Feynman explains how all scientists have lots of experience with "ignorance and
doubt" and after time, effort, testing and further degrees of uncertainty, subjects can still are unsure, with doubt, and uncertainty. Logic, data, critical
thinking and reasoning can only be as important of understanding. The understanding of the numerous struggles within science has been

Ethics in Science Essay
What do you think of when you hear or see the word "science"; test tubes, Einstein, Space? Science is "generally taken as meaning either (a) the exact
sciences, such as chemistry, physics, etc., or (b) a method of thought which obtains verifiable results by reasoning logically from observed fact"
(Orwell). Scientists are those who study science by scientific method. These "men of science", which Orwell describes as "a biologist, and astronomer,
perhaps a psychologist or a mathematician", "work by means of induction and deduction, and that by the help of these operations, they, in a sort of
sense, wring from Nature certain other things, which are called natural laws, and causes, and that out of these, by some cunning skill of their own,
...show more content...
This undoubtedly demonstrations the pros and cons of inventions made through science. There are people who abuse medicine, and other creations
from science, for numerous different reasons. Things like guns and nuclear weapons were formed to protect, but with the downside of killing
others. With all of this this being said, should there be a limit to things we make? More importantly, does science have an ethical responsibility to
humanity? I think to answer that question, we need to start with deciding if scientists have an ethical responsibility to humanity. As the saying goes,
with knowledge comes power and with power comes responsibility. However, there can be no limitation on the knowledge obtained from science.
Instead, we must limit what arises from knowledge and power. What are some responsibilities of scientists and the rest of the population? Well, to
start on the broadest sense, science should only be used for the absolute necessary improvement of humanity. It is our ethical responsibility to not
take advantage of science to further the advancement of military power, as we have done with the creation of atomic and nuclear bombs. Is it
responsible to use science for fame, fortune and glory? No, and it is not acceptable, but it is common for people to do so. If, for some reason, we had
the option to save 80% of endangered wildlife through scientific means, but with the consequence of harming the atmosphere, would it be ethical to
continue on? We would have

The Scientific Method Essay
The Scientific Method is the standardized procedure that scientists are supposed to follow when conducting experiments, in order to try to construct a
reliable, consistent, and non–arbitrary representation of our surroundings. To follow the Scientific Method is to stick very tightly to a order of
experimentation. First, the scientist must observe the phenomenon of interest. Next, the scientist must propose a hypothesis, or idea in which the
experiments will be based around. Then, through repeated experimentation, the hypothesis can either be proven false or become a theory. If the
hypothesis is proven to be false, the scientist must reformulate his or her ideas and come up with another hypothesis, and the experimentation begins
again. This...show more content...
Furthermore, flies were observed laying eggs where the maggots formed. Thus, he concluded that maggots are the result of flies, not spontaneous
generation. He then called the principles behind his experiment "Metodo Scientifico" or The Scientific Method.
The first cases of what would be considered properly using the Scientific Method can be found earlier, though, back in the studies of Galileo, early
in the 17th century. He first observed that heavy objects gain speed as they fall. He then proposed, or hypothesized, that the rate of falling of massive
objects was proportional to the distance that the object has fallen. Following the Scientific Method, he tested his hypothesis and found it to be false,
since objects falling unequal distances do not fall in the same amount of time, as his hypothesis led to. Since his hypothesis failed, he made a new one,
which proposed that the rate at which an object falls is directly proportional to the time the object has spent falling. This was tested by rolling balls
down an inclined plane and calculating the speed and time values from those observations. Later, these experiments led to the discovery of the
gravitational constant g, and a better understanding of the Scientific Method.
The Method has been used many times since Galileo conducted his experiments, and it has been considered a valid way of conducting experiments since

Scientific Writing Proposal
I propose to study in technical writing in scientific field, to learning effective science writing. The metaphor of context as rhetorical situation may
understate the power that context has to shape scientific discourse. The observed study of the scientific process can be challenging, but it will provide
you with better perception of how is the scientific process in writing. The rhetorical role of scientific discourse have can create in persuasive scientific,
narrative, emotional appeals, and innovations of imagination. Technical writing in certain field is how we write to communicate in unique language to
communicate to audience within community and to other beyond scientific community. The significance of utilizing special language will enhance
...show more content...
Interview from others student can be useful data to claim the importance of how scientific writing shapes us in educational system. The first step I
would manage my bibliography and literature view as center of activity. Over the time the lists of articles read and cited becomes significant works.
For applying bibliography from peer–reviewed, books and other sources allow me to generate more concepts. Using Mendeley as a tool to generate
bibliographies, and annotation of texts, also encourage communication between scientists around the sharing of references. Technology currently
impact on my ability to work. Useful data on how scientific writing using language to communicate between scientific community and outside the
community for exchange common interests, and their requirements to work as scientific platform. In order to make the content interesting to audience;
visual aid including maps, charts, graphs, and photographs will helps audiences comprehend the reading much better than the plain contexts. Using
proofread from writing center and peers may reduce chance of getting confuse words: heat has an effect on the reaction and heat affects the

Scientific Literacy
Attempts to achieve widespread scientific literacy, however, become as difficult as understanding concepts in science. Even if formal education can
provide basic scientific literacy for students in preparing for the workplace, science education in schools can hardly satisfy the needs of the general
public towards improvement of their scientific literacy.

scientific literacy Essay
Scientific literacy
Introduction and audience
When talk about science, perhaps majority of us think it is less relative with real life. However, as society developed, science encompassed us
everywhere. This situation forces everyone to acquire the ability to learn and understand science. Some may think that, scientific literacy is what a
scientist should have and nothing about normal people, however it is just too narrow. Look around the surroundings of us, everything is conned with
science. Also, we encounter science in our normal life as well. Therefore, the ability to acquire and understand science is necessary and important,
which is called scientific literacy. Scientific literacy is the foundation of science and technology...show more content...
Also, they might doubt the ingredient of their product (thinking creatively). What were they made of, would that influence their health? Finally, we
made the decision, it was a deceptive advertising and we wouldn't purchase it(problem solved). This is the one typical example process of using
scientific way to solve problems.
So far, we could tell scientific literacy is useful, but does it necessary for us? The next part is telling why it is necessary and the basic science
knowledge to acquire it.
Science knowledge is necessary
As the rapid development of science and technology, everyone in society is required to acquire higher scientific literate skill. What if one doesn't
acquire scientific literacy, not only he/she could not engage in science study or research, but would encounter difficulties in normal life. For
example, when we want to look for a book in the library, it would be so simply if we check it online, copy the index of the book and then go find it
directly. However, people who don't have the ability to acquire computer skill would have difficult. Therefore, scientific literacy is necessary in
contemporary life.
There is no doubt that science knowledge is the significant part of scientific literacy. Therefore, learning science is the first step. What is science? Just
taking a look at our surroundings, it not hard to find that science is everywhere. Simply example like how the lamp is lighted, which

Scientific Method
Science is an objective method used explain the natural phenomena of the universe. The practice of a scientific method provides a detailed outline that
contributes to expressing how to determine if a theory is scientific. A continual cycle that emphasizes the techniques of observations, questions,
hypothesis, prediction, experiment, and conclusion. The complications that arise when applying the scientific method to all theories is that science is
subject to change; therefore, it is hard to modify extensive ideas to a few simplified steps. A scientific explanation depends on existing experimental
theories to validate or disprove present and future logical arguments. This is because previous observations support abstract methods that may not be
testable and the continual change is dependent on specific predictions and discoveries.
Many aspects of scientific knowledge are hypothetical ideas, however, they contribute the same level of importance compared to a logical fact. A
scientific explanation is shaped from existing intelligence to develop future studies and...show more content...
Science is revised constantly; progressive observations that support and expand on existing ideas are documented. When new knowledge is interpreted
by scientists, they must perform a series of experimental trials. These observations can either confirm or contradict the analysis, both are beneficial to
resolving the experiment. Scientific explanations are dependent of proof. For example, when a new theory is published, the scientific method for the
examination is accessible for others to review. The public has the capacity to acquire the experiment's reports and contribute that data to their own
hypothesis. Science is justified through the combination of solutions. Current ideas are continually challenged by others attempting to modify and
simplify them into a universal

Essay Scientific Inquiry
Scientific inquiry is a process of critical thinking and asking questions that helps determine factual information that has been tested and proved or
disproved instead of relying on assumptions and intuition. Scientific inquiry is important in psychology, as it is in all fields of science, allowing us to
examine assumptions, assess outcomes, discern hidden values, evaluate evidence, and put ideas to the test. This scientific approach guards us against
hindsight bias, believing after learning an outcome that we would have foreseen it, known also as the knew–it–all–along phenomenon. It also protects
us from judgmental overconfidence, the bias to seek information that confirms a judgment based on intuition. Hindsight bias and overconfidence...show
more content...
This one individual, if studied, would provide a different set of data then the one's used to conclude that smokers die younger. The survey is another
useful tool that asks questions and asks people to report their behavior or opinions. Surveying allows a psychologist to gather information from large
groups, but this can still error because the requested information relies on the wording of a question, the group selected to respond, and the
respondents giving accurate self reports. If we were to survey students on college campus on their drinking habits we will get a very different response
from the professors on the same college campus with the same survey. Naturalistic observation is a research method that allows us to watch and record
data in a natural occurring environment. This allows us to observe situations without external controls or manipulations. However, naturalistic
observation only permits us to describe a behavior, not explain it. The correlation method is a statistical measure that makes data that may have gone
unnoticed, now seen to the eye by indicating the possibility of a relationship between two closely related things. Statistics show that children today
watch more television, while another shows children today read less. With these two ideas we may predict a statistical relationship that children today
read less because they are watching more television. The down side to this approach is that correlation does not provide

Scientific Theory Essay
Scientific Theory
A scientific theory is a well–substantiated explanation of some aspects of the natural world, based on a body of knowledge that has been repeatedly
confirmed through observation and experiment. Scientist creates scientific theories from hypothesis that have been corroborated through the scientific
method, then gather evidence to test their accuracy. The strength of a scientific theory is related to the diversity of phenomena it can explain, which is
measured by its ability to make falsifiable predictions with respect to the phenomena. Scientific theories are the most reliable, rigorous, and
comprehensive for of scientific knowledge.
The scientific method involves the proposal and testing of hypotheses, by deriving...show more content...
Theories are the main goal in science and no explanation can achieve a higher rank. (to the belief that "theories" become "laws" over time). In some
cases, theories can unify. Two or more theories can be replaces by a single theory which explains the previous theories as approximations or special
cases, comparable to the way a theorys is connecting explanation for many confirmed hypotheses: This is reffered to as Unification of Theories. Both
scientific laws and scientific theories are produced from scientific methods through the formation and testing of hypotheses, and can predict the
behavior of the natural world. Both are typically supported by observation and experimental science. However, scientific laws are descriptive accounts
of how nature will behave under certain conditions. Scientific theories are broader in scope, and give overarching explanations of how nature works
and why it exhibits certain characteristics. They are supported by evidence from many different sources, and may contain one or more laws.
Both scientific laws and scientific theories come from the scientific method through the formation and testing of hypotheses, and can predict the
behavior of the natural world. Both are usually well supported by observations and/or experimental evidence. However laws are descriptive accounts of
how nature will behave under certain conditions. Assumption is a

The Scientific Method
The scientific method is an organized way that helps anyone answer a question or begin to solve a problem. It is used in all types of Sciences such as
Chemistry, Physics, Geology, and Psychology. For psychologists it offers a standardized way to test a hypothesis, build on theories, and gain
knowledge about the mind. There are several steps to The Scientific Method and each step serves its own purpose. By using the Scientific Method, you
can understand better what psychologists go through to arrive at conclusions about human behavior.
The first step in the Scientific Method is to formulate a specific question that can be tested. Once you have identified the question, you can formulate a
hypothesis. The hypothesis explains the association between

Scientific Method
Scientific Method
The Scientific Method is simple set of rules meant to help people find an answer to any question through experimentation and research. It is globally
known for its effectiveness in answering difficult problems. While some steps may seem complicated, they can be more simple then was thought
beforehand. While some people think only scientists use it, it's actually used by everyone all the time, which is why it's important to learn the process.
While some steps are more complicated than others, there are only six to memorize. The first to find a question that people don't know the answer to,
and go from there. Step two is to form a hypothesis as to what the answer will be. Afterwards, it is a smart decision to research the question being
answered to help understand it more. Experimentation is the next step in the process, and is more hands on than the others. The second to last step is to
collect data and information from the experiment that was just completed. Lastly, the person using the scientific method will used the data to determine
the answer of the dilemma. However, some areas state differences in the steps, as this is the most commonly used way of answering a problem....show
more content...
Steps of the Scientific Method states that the hypothesis comes after research, for one case. Info from Logic and the Scientific Method says next to
nothing about the steps, and everything about who used it first. Examples of testable questions are shown on Science Fair Central. Not every area has
the same information, which may make it difficult to find. However, scientists agree it's used for

M &Amp; M Scientific Method

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Write My Paper Cheap Chillicothe

More from Write My Paper Cheap Chillicothe (18)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

M &Amp; M Scientific Method