the purpose of this paper is to address the following clinical scenario with the use of your textbook, external credible literature, and/or reliable electronic sources. Use the guide below to draft your paper and review the rubric to ensure you have met the assignment criteria. The expected length of the paper is 4-5 pages, which does not include the cover page and reference page(s). Lisa Anderson, a 22 y.o., Caucasian single parent, is referred for genetic counseling by her pediatric Nurse Practitioner. She has a 3-year-old boy with developmental delay and small joint hyperextensibility. The pediatric Nurse Practitioner has diagnosed fragile X-associated mental retardation. She is currently pregnant with her second child at 14 weeks of gestation. The family history is unremarkable. Please use the following headings/subheadings as a guide to draft your paper: Introduction (including a brief purpose statement) Identify the genetic mutation responsible for fragile X-associated mental retardation. Describe and discuss how it causes the clinical syndrome of developmental delay, joint hyperextensibility, large testes, and facial abnormalities. Identify which parent is the probable carrier of the genetic mutation? Explain why this parent and the grandparents are phenotypically unaffected. Discuss the likelihood that the unborn child will be affected? VII. Conclusion I n regard to APA format, please use the following as a guide: Include a cover page and running head (this is not part of the 4–5-page limit) Include transitions in your paper (i.e., headings or subheadings) Use in-text references throughout the paper Use double space, 12-point Times New Roman font Spelling, grammar, and organization are appropriate Include a reference list (this is not part of the 4–5-page limit) Attempt to use primary sources only. That said, you may cite reliable electronic sources (i.e., ANA) · Assignment 1 Rubric Criteria 60 Points 55 Points 50 Points 40 Points Earned Points Content: Application & Analysis Responds correctly and/or appropriately to all questions and criteria. Content is excellent. Demonstrates a high level of critical thinking, shows significant insight or creative thought about the topic, and does not merely recite the text/resources. Uses concepts and terminology correctly. Detail rich and specific. Responds correctly and/or appropriately to all questions and criteria. Content is good. Demonstrates some critical thinking throughout the paper and may also show some insight or creative thinking about the topic. Mostly uses concepts and terminology correctly (1-2 issues). Minor detail inconsistencies (1-2). Responds correctly and/or appropriately to at least one question OR if only one question, partially responds to question. Does not address all criteria. Content is minimal. Demonstrates at least one critic.