The document summarizes key aspects of India's Prevention of Money Laundering Act of 2002. It defines money laundering and outlines the three main stages: placement, layering, and integration. It describes various criminal activities that can generate illicit funds and popular methods used to launder money. The summary also discusses important sections of the act related to definitions, objectives to prevent money laundering, punishment for offenses, attachment and confiscation of property, and search and seizure powers of authorities. The overall purpose of the act is to combat money laundering in India.
The Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA) is an Act to prevent money-laundering and to provide for confiscation of property derived from, or involved in, money-laundering. In this webinar, we shall analyse and understand the various provisions of the Act covering the meaning of Money Laundering, the consequences and the procedures involved.
Prevention of Money Laundering Act 2002ramandeepjrf
Prevention of money laundering act 2002
Definitions, Obligation for Banks, Financial Institutions, Intermediaries, Attachment, Adjudication and confiscation of property, Appellate Tribunal, Special Court, Penalty and fine.
The Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA) is an Act to prevent money-laundering and to provide for confiscation of property derived from, or involved in, money-laundering. In this webinar, we shall analyse and understand the various provisions of the Act covering the meaning of Money Laundering, the consequences and the procedures involved.
Prevention of Money Laundering Act 2002ramandeepjrf
Prevention of money laundering act 2002
Definitions, Obligation for Banks, Financial Institutions, Intermediaries, Attachment, Adjudication and confiscation of property, Appellate Tribunal, Special Court, Penalty and fine.
OBJECTIVE
Liquidator is a person appointed by a Company or a Competent authority to manage the activities of winding up of the Company. Provisions pertaining to appointment of liquidator are stipulated under Chapter XX of Companies Act, 2013. The webinar covers the aspects of appointment of liquidator, types of liquidators, powers and duties of liquidator and judicial precedents.
OBJECTIVE
Import of all kinds of goods and the export of goods on certain situations attracts customs duty. The Customs Act,1962 contains provisions which govern the levy of customs duty. In this webinar, we shall deal with provisions relating to prosecutions and penalties levied on the person for any offences.
The obligation of a banker to honour his customer’s cheque is extinguished (not accepted or clear) on receipt of an order of the Court, known as the Garnishee order, issued under Order 21, Rule 46 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
A court order instructing a garnishee (a bank) that funds held on behalf of a debtor (the judgement debtor) should not be released until directed by the court. The order may also instruct the bank to pay a given sum to the judgement creditor (the person to whom a debt is owed by the judgement debtor) from these funds.
If the debtor fails to pay the debt owned by him to his creditor, the latter may apply to the court for the issue of a garnshee order on the banker of his debtor.
The account of the customer with the banker, thus, becomes suspended and the banker is under an obligation not to make any payment thereof.
The creditor at whose request the order is issued is called the judgment creditor; the debtor whose money is frozen is called judgment debtor and the banker who is the debtor of the judgment debtor is called the Garnishee.
The Garnishee order is issued in two parts
The court directs the banker to stop payment out of the account of the judgement-debtor
ORDER NISHI
After the bank file his explanation, if any, the court may issue the final order, called ORDER ABSOLUTE
OBJECTIVE
Liquidator is a person appointed by a Company or a Competent authority to manage the activities of winding up of the Company. Provisions pertaining to appointment of liquidator are stipulated under Chapter XX of Companies Act, 2013. The webinar covers the aspects of appointment of liquidator, types of liquidators, powers and duties of liquidator and judicial precedents.
OBJECTIVE
Import of all kinds of goods and the export of goods on certain situations attracts customs duty. The Customs Act,1962 contains provisions which govern the levy of customs duty. In this webinar, we shall deal with provisions relating to prosecutions and penalties levied on the person for any offences.
The obligation of a banker to honour his customer’s cheque is extinguished (not accepted or clear) on receipt of an order of the Court, known as the Garnishee order, issued under Order 21, Rule 46 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
A court order instructing a garnishee (a bank) that funds held on behalf of a debtor (the judgement debtor) should not be released until directed by the court. The order may also instruct the bank to pay a given sum to the judgement creditor (the person to whom a debt is owed by the judgement debtor) from these funds.
If the debtor fails to pay the debt owned by him to his creditor, the latter may apply to the court for the issue of a garnshee order on the banker of his debtor.
The account of the customer with the banker, thus, becomes suspended and the banker is under an obligation not to make any payment thereof.
The creditor at whose request the order is issued is called the judgment creditor; the debtor whose money is frozen is called judgment debtor and the banker who is the debtor of the judgment debtor is called the Garnishee.
The Garnishee order is issued in two parts
The court directs the banker to stop payment out of the account of the judgement-debtor
ORDER NISHI
After the bank file his explanation, if any, the court may issue the final order, called ORDER ABSOLUTE
The amendments of Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act should further enhance India’s attractiveness as an investment destination by encouraging greater transparency in ownership of property. Along with other regulatory changes such as implementation of Goods and Services Act (GST), Real Estate (Regulation & Development) Act (RERA) and Land Digitization, this amendment is a step in the right direction. In the short term, it will lead to a reduction in transaction volumes. However, in the long term, it will help aligning transactions with ethical standards and will increase international institutional investors and financial insitutions participation in this sector.
Very recently, Benami Property Act was enacted to control black money in India. After demonetisation huge Benami Transactions were recorded. The Act should be taken seriously.
This material is a part of our PGPSE programe. Our programme is available for any student after class 12th / graduation. AFTERSCHO☺OL conducts PGPSE, which is available free to all online students. There are no charges. PGPSE is a very rigorous programme, designed to give a comprehensive training in social entrepreneurship / spiritual entrepreneurship. This programme is aimed at those persons, who want to ultimately set up their own business enterprises which can benefit society substantially. PGPSE is a unique programme, as it combines industry consultancy, business solutions and case studies in addition to spirituality and social concerns. You can read the details at www.afterschoool.tk or at www.afterschool.tk
Presentation given for Crowe Horwath Auditor's training session on 26/03/2016.
AML regulations are applicable to professional service providers also. See the presentation for more information
Prepared for Arvind Kejriwal & IAC team
Date: April, 2011
Objective
To establish non-negotiables from the Jan Lokpal Bill and facilitate awareness and consensus building amongst the public on key points.
Taxmann's Benami Black Money & Money Laundering LawsTaxmann
Taxmann’s Benami, Black Money & Money Laundering Laws provides a compilation of annotated, amended & updated on the following Laws:
• Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988 with Rules, Schemes & Notifications
• Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and Imposition of Tax Act, 2015 with Rules, Challans, Instructions and Circulars & Notifications
• Prevention of Money-laundering Act, 2002 with Rules & Notifications
• Fugitive Economic Offenders Act, 2018 with Rules, Regulations & Notifications
This book aims to provides a complete and thorough understanding of the statutory portion of the Benami and Black Money Laws.
The Present Publication is the Latest Edition, as amended by the Finance Act 2021.
MONEY LAUNDERING: A THREE-STEP SECRET GAMEMd Arman
This paper describes, theoretically, what money laundering is and
how it is done following some partnered activities over time. This
paper also looks for electronic money laundering and finds related
and predefined functions completed using electronic gadgets and the
Internet. To give a clear view on money laundering, the author thinks
it is necessary to make it clear first about the characteristics of money
laundering, the reasons behind it, and how it negatively impacts the
business and economy of a country. Money laundering is a crime in
most nations, and economically developed countries built a strong
fortress against money launderers, but laundering is not stopped. So,
this paper tries to find out what the launderers do and find innovative
(legally unaccepted) ways to make their illicit money legal.
Introducing New Government Regulation on Toll Road.pdfAHRP Law Firm
For nearly two decades, Government Regulation Number 15 of 2005 on Toll Roads ("GR No. 15/2005") has served as the cornerstone of toll road legislation. However, with the emergence of various new developments and legal requirements, the Government has enacted Government Regulation Number 23 of 2024 on Toll Roads to replace GR No. 15/2005. This new regulation introduces several provisions impacting toll business entities and toll road users. Find out more out insights about this topic in our Legal Brief publication.
Military Commissions details LtCol Thomas Jasper as Detailed Defense CounselThomas (Tom) Jasper
Military Commissions Trial Judiciary, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Notice of the Chief Defense Counsel's detailing of LtCol Thomas F. Jasper, Jr. USMC, as Detailed Defense Counsel for Abd Al Hadi Al-Iraqi on 6 August 2014 in the case of United States v. Hadi al Iraqi (10026)
RIGHTS OF VICTIM EDITED PRESENTATION(SAIF JAVED).pptxOmGod1
Victims of crime have a range of rights designed to ensure their protection, support, and participation in the justice system. These rights include the right to be treated with dignity and respect, the right to be informed about the progress of their case, and the right to be heard during legal proceedings. Victims are entitled to protection from intimidation and harm, access to support services such as counseling and medical care, and the right to restitution from the offender. Additionally, many jurisdictions provide victims with the right to participate in parole hearings and the right to privacy to protect their personal information from public disclosure. These rights aim to acknowledge the impact of crime on victims and to provide them with the necessary resources and involvement in the judicial process.
Car Accident Injury Do I Have a Case....Knowyourright
Every year, thousands of Minnesotans are injured in car accidents. These injuries can be severe – even life-changing. Under Minnesota law, you can pursue compensation through a personal injury lawsuit.
NATURE, ORIGIN AND DEVELOPMENT OF INTERNATIONAL LAW.pptxanvithaav
These slides helps the student of international law to understand what is the nature of international law? and how international law was originated and developed?.
The slides was well structured along with the highlighted points for better understanding .
PRECEDENT AS A SOURCE OF LAW (SAIF JAVED).pptxOmGod1
Precedent, or stare decisis, is a cornerstone of common law systems where past judicial decisions guide future cases, ensuring consistency and predictability in the legal system. Binding precedents from higher courts must be followed by lower courts, while persuasive precedents may influence but are not obligatory. This principle promotes fairness and efficiency, allowing for the evolution of the law as higher courts can overrule outdated decisions. Despite criticisms of rigidity and complexity, precedent ensures similar cases are treated alike, balancing stability with flexibility in judicial decision-making.
WINDING UP of COMPANY, Modes of DissolutionKHURRAMWALI
Winding up, also known as liquidation, refers to the legal and financial process of dissolving a company. It involves ceasing operations, selling assets, settling debts, and ultimately removing the company from the official business registry.
Here's a breakdown of the key aspects of winding up:
Reasons for Winding Up:
Insolvency: This is the most common reason, where the company cannot pay its debts. Creditors may initiate a compulsory winding up to recover their dues.
Voluntary Closure: The owners may decide to close the company due to reasons like reaching business goals, facing losses, or merging with another company.
Deadlock: If shareholders or directors cannot agree on how to run the company, a court may order a winding up.
Types of Winding Up:
Voluntary Winding Up: This is initiated by the company's shareholders through a resolution passed by a majority vote. There are two main types:
Members' Voluntary Winding Up: The company is solvent (has enough assets to pay off its debts) and shareholders will receive any remaining assets after debts are settled.
Creditors' Voluntary Winding Up: The company is insolvent and creditors will be prioritized in receiving payment from the sale of assets.
Compulsory Winding Up: This is initiated by a court order, typically at the request of creditors, government agencies, or even by the company itself if it's insolvent.
Process of Winding Up:
Appointment of Liquidator: A qualified professional is appointed to oversee the winding-up process. They are responsible for selling assets, paying off debts, and distributing any remaining funds.
Cease Trading: The company stops its regular business operations.
Notification of Creditors: Creditors are informed about the winding up and invited to submit their claims.
Sale of Assets: The company's assets are sold to generate cash to pay off creditors.
Payment of Debts: Creditors are paid according to a set order of priority, with secured creditors receiving payment before unsecured creditors.
Distribution to Shareholders: If there are any remaining funds after all debts are settled, they are distributed to shareholders according to their ownership stake.
Dissolution: Once all claims are settled and distributions made, the company is officially dissolved and removed from the business register.
Impact of Winding Up:
Employees: Employees will likely lose their jobs during the winding-up process.
Creditors: Creditors may not recover their debts in full, especially if the company is insolvent.
Shareholders: Shareholders may not receive any payout if the company's debts exceed its assets.
Winding up is a complex legal and financial process that can have significant consequences for all parties involved. It's important to seek professional legal and financial advice when considering winding up a company.
ALL EYES ON RAFAH BUT WHY Explain more.pdf46adnanshahzad
All eyes on Rafah: But why?. The Rafah border crossing, a crucial point between Egypt and the Gaza Strip, often finds itself at the center of global attention. As we explore the significance of Rafah, we’ll uncover why all eyes are on Rafah and the complexities surrounding this pivotal region.
INTRODUCTION
What makes Rafah so significant that it captures global attention? The phrase ‘All eyes are on Rafah’ resonates not just with those in the region but with people worldwide who recognize its strategic, humanitarian, and political importance. In this guide, we will delve into the factors that make Rafah a focal point for international interest, examining its historical context, humanitarian challenges, and political dimensions.
1. THE PREVENTION OF MONEY-
LAUNDERING ACT, 2002
(15 OF 2003)
As Amended
by The Finance
Act,2016
2. Definition - Money Laundering
OFFENCE OF MONEY LAUNDERING:-
Whosoever directly or indirectly attempts to indulge or
knowingly assists or knowingly is a party or is actually involved
in any process or activity connected with the [proceeds of crime
including its concealment, possession, acquisition or use and
projecting or claiming ] it as untainted property shall be guilty of
offence of money-laundering.
In easier terms, any action which leads to conversion of Illegal
money/assets into legitimate fund/assets shall be considered as an
“Offence of Money Laundering” .
Conversion
Illegal/
Dirty
Money
Legitimate/
White
Money
3. Definitions….
Proceeds of Crime:- Means any property derived or obtained,
directly or indirectly, by any person as a result of criminal
activity relating to a scheduled offence or the value of any such
property [or where such property is taken or held outside the
country, then the property equivalent in value held within the
country]
Property:- Means any property or assets of every description,
whether corporeal or incorporeal, movable or immovable,
tangible or intangible and includes deeds and instruments
evidencing title to, or interest in, such property or assets,
wherever located.
4. Criminal
Activities
Money Laundering generally refers to ‘Washing‘
of the proceeds or profits generated from :-
Extortion
Terrorist
Acts
Counterfeiting
& Forgery
Gambling,
Robbery,
Cheating
Drug Trafficking
Smuggling
Bribery &
Corruption
5. Some of the Popular Activities through
which Money is laundered…
Popular
Activities
Stock Markets
Agricultural
Products
Property
Markets
Creating Bogus
Companies
Showing
Loans
False Export-
Import Invoices
6.
7. Stages in Money Laundering
Placement
• Illegal funds or assets are bought into the financial
system.
Layering
• Use of multiple accounts, banks, intermediaries,
corporations, countries etc. to disguise the origin.
Integration
• Funds are made available as apparently legitimate.
8. Placement
Placement refers to the physical disposal of bulk cash proceeds
derived from illegal activity.
This is the first step of the Money-Laundering process and the
ultimate aim of this phase is to remove the cash from the location
of acquisition so as to avoid detection from the authorities.
This is achieved by investing criminal money into the legal
financial system by opening up a bank account in the name of
unknown individuals or organizations and depositing the money
in that account.
It may involve use of smurfing techniques through which the
launderers make numerous deposits of amounts of money that
are small enough to avoid raising suspicion.
9. Layering
Layering is the movement of funds from institution to institution
to hide their origin.
It consists of putting funds, which have entered the financial
system, through series of financial operations to mislead potential
investigators and to give the funds the appearance of having legal
origins.
Launderers may purchase expensive items such as jewellery,
yachts or cars in order to change the money’s form.
10. Integration
It refers to the reinsertion of the laundered proceeds back into the
economy in such a way that they re-enter the financial system as
normal business funds.
The funds may be reintroduced in the economy through, for
instance, the purchase of luxury items or through investment in
assets such as shares in a company or real estate.
11. Objective
To Prevent and Control Money Laundering
To Confiscate and Seize the property obtained
from the Laundered Money
To deal with any other issue connected with
Money Laundering in India
The PMLA seeks to combat money laundering in India and has 3
main objectives:
12. Punishment
In addition , the tainted property shall be confiscated by
the Central Government u/s 8(5).
Any person found guilty of
Money Laundering
If Proceeds of Crime involve any
offence under paragraph 2 of
Part A of Schedule Offences (i.e.
under the Narcotic Drugs and
Psychotropic Substance
Act,1985)
Rigorous
Imprisonment from 3
years to 7 years,
Rigorous
Imprisonment from 3
years to 10 years,
Fine up to Rs.5 lakhFine up to Rs.5 lakh
AND AND
13. Sec.5 :- Attachment of Property involved in Money-
Laundering
Sec.6 :- Adjudicating Authorities, Composition, Powers,
etc.
Sec.7 :- Staff of Adjudication Authorities
Sec.8 :- Adjudication
Sec.9 :- Vesting of property in Central Government
Sec.10:- Management of Properties confiscated
Sec.11:- Power regarding Summons, Production of
Documents and Evidence etc.
Attachment, Adjudication & Confiscation
14. Where the Director or any other officer not below the rank of Deputy Director , has
reason to believe (recorded in writing), on the basis of material in his possession, that-
a) Any person is in possession of any proceeds of crime; and
b) Such proceeds of crime are likely to be concealed, transferred or dealt with in any
manner which may result in frustrating any proceedings relating to confiscation of
such proceeds of crime, he may by order in writing, provisionally attach such
property for a period not exceeding 180 days from the date of the order.
The Director or any other officer not below the rank of Deputy Director shall
immediately after attachment forward a copy of the order, alongwith the material in
his possession to the Adjudicating Authority.
Every order of attachment made under this section shall cease to have effect after the
expiry of the specified period or on the date of the order made u/s 8 (2), which ever is
earlier.
This section shall not prevent the person interested in the enjoyment of the
immovable property attached from such enjoyment.
The Director or any other officer who provisionally attaches any property shall within
a period of 30 days from such attachment, file a complaint stating the facts of such
attachment before the Adjudicating Authority.
Sec. 5:- Attachment of Property involved
in Money-Laundering
15. There are 4 Authorities for the purpose of this act:-
a) Director or Additional Director or Joint Director,
b) Deputy Director,
c) Assistant Director, and
d) Such other classes of officers as may be appointed for
the purposes of this Act.
Sec. 48:- Authorities
16. On receipt of complaint u/s 5(5), or applications made u/s 17(4) or u/s 18(10), if
the Adjudicating Authority has reason to believe that any person has committed
an [offence u/s 3 or is in possession of proceeds of crime], it may serve a notice of
not less than 30 days on such person calling upon him to indicate the sources of
his income, earnings or assets, out of which or by means of which he has acquired
the property attached u/s 5(1), or seized or frozen u/s 17 or 18, the evidence on
which he relies and other relevant information and particulars, and to show cause
why all or any of such properties should not be declared to be the properties
involved in money-laundering and confiscated by the Central Government.
Where a notice specifies that any property as being held by a person on behalf of
any other person, a copy of such notice shall also be served upon such other
person.
Where such property is jointly held by more than one person than such notice
shall be served to all persons holding such property.
Sec. 8:- Adjudication
17. The Adjudicating Authority shall, after-
a) Considering the reply of the notice issued;
b) Hearing the aggrieved person and the director or any other officer
authorised by him in this behalf; and
c) Taking into account all the relevant materials placed on record before him,
by an order, record a finding whether all or any of the properties which are
referred in the notice are involved in money-laundering.
If a property is claimed by a person other than a person to whom the
notice had been issued than an opportunity of being heard shall also be
given to such person also to prove that the property is not involved in
money-laundering.
Sec. 8:- Adjudication….
18. If an Adjudicating Authority decides that any property is involved in money-
laundering than he shall by an order in writing, confirm the attachment of the
property or retention of the property or record seized or frozen and record a
finding of that effect.
Such attachment or record shall – (a) continue during the pendency of the
proceedings relating to any offence under this act; and (b) become final after an
order of confiscation is passed by the Special Court.
Where the provisional order of attachment made u/s 5(1) has been confirmed then
the Director or any other officer authorised by him in this behalf shall forthwith
take the possession of the property attached or frozen.
If Special Court finds that the offence of money-laundering has been committed ,
it shall order that such property involved in money- laundering or the property
which has been used for the commission of the offence of money-laundering shall
stand confiscated to the Central Government.
If Special Court finds that the offence of money-laundering has not been
committed or the property is not involved in money-laundering , it shall order
release of such property to the person entitled to receive it.
Sec. 8:- Adjudication….
19. Where an order of confiscation has been made in respect of any property of a
person, all the rights and title in such property shall vest absolutely in the Central
Government free from all encumbrances.
The Special Court or the Adjudicating Authority shall attach or seize the property
only after giving an opportunity of being heard to the person interested in the
property attached or seized or frozen.
If any encumbrance on the property or lease-hold interest has been created with a
view to defeat the provisions of chapter-V , then it may, by order declare such
encumbrance or lease-hold interest to be void and thereupon the aforesaid
property shall vest in the Central Government free from such encumbrance or
lease-hold interest.
Proviso given under this sec. says that any liability in respect of such
encumbrances which may be enforced against any person shall not be discharged
from such person.
Sec. 9:- Vesting of Property in Central
Government
20. The Central Government may, by order published in the official
gazette, as many of its officers ( not below the rank of a joint
secretary to the government of India) as it thinks fit, to perform the
functions of Administrator.
The Administrator appointed shall receive and manage the property
in relation to which an order has been made in such manner and
subject to such conditions as may be prescribed.
The Administrator shall also take such measures, as the Central
Government may direct, to dispose of the property which is vested
in the Central Government u/s 9.
Sec. 10:- Management of Properties
Confiscated
21. Sec.16 :- Power of Survey
Sec.17:- Search & Seizure
Sec.18:- Search of Persons
Sec.19:- Power to Arrest
Sec.20:- Retention of Property
Sec.21:- Retention of Records
Sec.22:-Presumption as to Records or Property in certain cases
Sec.23:-Presumption in Inter-Connected Transactions
Sec.24:-Burden of Proof
Summons, Searches and Seizures
22. Sec.16 “Power
of Survey”, if
an Authority
On the basis of
material which
is in his
possession, and
Has Reason
to Believe
which is in
writing
An offence u/s 3 has
been committed
/commission of such
offence is carried on
Than he may conduct a
survey on that person and
may enter any place which
are:-
Within the
limits of the
area assigned
to him.
He is authorised for the
purpose of this sec. By any
other authority(to whom such
area is assigned)
Authority may require any
proprietor, employee or any other
person who may at that time and
place is there to :-
Afford him
necessary facility
to inspect such
records as he may
require and are
available at that
place at that time,
Afford him necessary
facility to check or verify
the proceeds of crime or
any transaction which is
related to that proceeds of
crime which may be
found during survey; and
Furnish such
information
as he may
require for
his
proceedings.
The Authority after
completion of survey forward
a copy of the reasons so
recorded along with material
in his possession to the
Adjudicating Authority.
23. “Search & Seizure”
(Sec.17)
If the Director or any other
officer (not below the rank of
Deputy Director) on the basis
of information in his
possession, has reason to
believe that any person:-
Has committed
any act which
constitutes
money-
laundering, or
Is in possession
of any proceeds
of crime
involved in
money-
laundering, or
Is in
possession of
any records
relating to
money-
laundering, or
Is in
possession of
any property
related to
crime
Then, he may
authorise any
officer
subordinate to
him to:-
Enter and
search any
building,
place,vessel,
vehicle or
aircraft
Seize any
record or
Property
found
Break upon the lock of
any door, box, locker,
almirah, safe or other
receptacle (where the
keys thereof are not
available )
Place marks
of
Identificatio
n on such
record or
property
Examine
on oath
any
person
Make a note
or an
inventory of
such record
or property
24. The authority shall within a
period of 30 days from such
seizure or freezing, file an
application before the
Adjudicating Authority
(Requesting for retention of
seizure or for continuation of
the order of freezing served
If an authority is satisfied that
any information obtained
during survey is
concealed/tampered, then he
may enter and search the
building or place
The Authorised officer may
freeze such record or property
which cannot be seized
The Authority after search and
seizure forward a copy of the
reasons so recorded along with
material in his possession to the
Adjudicating Authority.
“Search & Seizure”
(Sec.17)
25. “Search of Persons” (Sec.18)
If an authority has reason to believe (in writing) that any person has secreted about his person
or in anything under his possession, ownership or control, any record or proceeds of crime
which may be useful for relevant to any proceedings under this Act, he may search that
person and seize such record or property.
The authority immediately
after search and seizure,
forward a copy of the
reasons and material in his
possession to the
Adjudicating Authority.
Where an authority is about to
search any person, he shall , if
such person so requires, take
such person within 24 hours to
the nearest Gazetted Officer,
superior in rank to him or a
Magistrate.
If the requisition is made, the
authority shall not detain the
person for more than 24 hours
prior to taking him before the
Gazetted Officer, superior in
rank to him or a Magistrate.
The Gazetted
Officer or the
Magistrate before
whom any such
person is brought
shall, if he sees
no reasonable
ground for
search, forthwith
discharge such
person.
Before making
the search the
authority shall
call upon two
or more
persons to
attend and
witness the
search and it
shall be made
in the presence
of such persons.
The authority
shall prepare
a list of
record or
property
seized in the
course of the
search and
obtain the
signatures of
the witnesses
on the list.
The
Authority
shall record
the
statement of
the person
searched.
No female
shall be
searched by
any one
except a
female.
The authority seizing
any record or property
shall, within a period
of 30 days from such
seizure , file an
application requesting
for retention of such
record or property,
before the
Adjudicating
Authority.
26. Section 19 “Power to Arrest”
If the Director, Deputy Director, Assistant Director or any other
officer autorised in this behalf by the Central Government by
general or special order, has on the basis of material in his
possession, reason to believe ( to be recorded in writing) that any
person has been guilty of an offence punishable under this act, he
may arrest such person and shall, as soon as may be, inform him
of the grounds for such arrest.
The Director, Deputy Director, Assistant Director or any other officer
shall, immediately after arrest of such person forward a copy of the
order along with the material in his possession, to the Adjudicating
Authority.
Every person arrested shall within 24 hours be take to a Judicial
Magistrate or a Metropolitan Magistrate. The period of 24
hours shall exclude the time necessary for the journey from the
place of arrest to the Magistrate’s Court.
27. Sec.20 “Retention of Property”
Where any property has been
seized or frozen and the
authorised officer has on the
basis of material in his
possession and has reason to
believe (in writing) that such
property is required to be
retained for the purposes of
adjudication. Such property
may if seized, be retained or if
frozen, may continue to remain
frozen for a period not
exceeding 180 days from the
day on which such property
was seized or frozen.
The office authorised by the
Director shall immediately
after he has passed an order for
retention or continuation of
freezing of the property for the
purposes of adjudication
forward a copy of the order
along with the material in his
possession to the Adjudicating
Authority.
On the expiry of the said
period, the property shall be
returned to the person from
whom such property was seized
or whose property was ordered
to be frozen unless the
Adjudicating Authority permits
retention or continuation or
freezing of such property
beyond the said period.
The Adjudicating Authority before authorising the
retention/continuation of freezing of such property beyond the
specified period, he shall satisfy himself that the property is
prima facie involve in Money-Laundering and it is required for
the purpose of adjudication.
After passing the order of confiscation Special court shall
direct the release of all the property other than the property
involved in Money-Laundering.
Where an order releasing the property has been passed by the special court/Adjudicating
Authority, the Director or any other officer authorised by him in this behalf may withhold the
release of any such property for a period of 90 days from the date of [receipt] such order , if he is the
opinion that such property is relevant for the appeal proceedings under this Act.
28. Sec 21 “Retention of Records”
Where any records has been seized or frozen and the Investigating Officer
or the authorised officer in this behalf, has reason to believe that any of
such records are required to be retained for any inquiry. Such records may
if seized, be retained or if frozen, may continue to remain frozen for a
period not exceeding 180 days from the day on which such property was
seized or frozen.
On the expiry of the
said period, the
records shall be
returned to the person
from whom such
records were seized or
whose records were
ordered to be frozen
unless the
Adjudicating
Authority permits
retention or
continuation or
freezing of such
records beyond the
said period.
The
Adjudicating
Authority
before
authorising the
retention/contin
uation of
freezing of such
records beyond
the specified
period, he shall
satisfy himself
that the records
are required for
the purpose of
adjudication.
Where an order releasing
the records has been made
by the special
court/Adjudicating
Authority, the Director or
any other officer
authorised by him in this
behalf may withhold the
release of any such record
for a period of 90 days
from the date of [receipt}]
such order , if he is the
opinion that such record
is relevant for the appeal
proceedings under this
Act.
The person from
such records
seized or frozen ,
shall be entitled
to obtain copies
of records.
After passing
of an order of
confiscation ,
the
Adjudicating
Authority
shall direct
the release of
the records
to the person
from whom
such records
were seized.
29. The director or any person aggrieved by an order made by the
Adjudicating Authority may prefer an appeal to the Appellate Tribunal.
Any reporting entity aggrieved by any order of the Director may also
prefer an appeal to the Appellate Tribunal.
Every appeal shall be filed within a period of 45 days from the date on
which a copy of the order made by the Adjudicating Authority or Director
is received.
Appellate Tribunal after giving an opportunity of being heard entertain an
appeal after the expiry of the said period of 45 days, only if it is satisfied
that there was sufficient cause for not filing it within that period.
On receipt of an appeal, the Appellate Tribunal may, after giving the
parties to the appeal an opportunity of being heard, pass such orders
thereon as it thinks fit, confirming, modifying or setting aside the order
appealed against.
The Appellate Tribunal shall send a copy of every order made by it to the
parties to the appeal and to the concerned Adjudicating Authority or
Director, as the case may be.
The Appellate Tribunal shall dispose of the appeal within 6 months from
the date of filing of the appeal.
Sec. 26 :- Appeals to Appellate Tribunal
30. Any person aggrieved by any decision or order of the Appellate
Tribunal may file an appeal to the High Court within 60 days
from the date of communication of the decision or order of the
Appellate Tribunal to him on any question of law or fact arising
out of such order.
The High Court may if it is satisfied that the Appellate was
prevented by sufficient cause from filing the appeal within the
said period allow it to be filed within a further period not
exceeding 60 days.
Sec. 42 :- Appeal to High Court
31. Sec. 62:- Punishment for Vexatious Search
Sec. 63:- Punishment for False information or
Failure to give information
Sec. 64:- Cognizance of offences
Miscellaneous
32. Any authority or officer exercising powers under this act
or any rules made there under, who without reasons
recorded in writing, -
a) Searches or causes to be searched any building or
place; or
b) Detains or searches or arrests any person,
Then he shall be liable for punishment for such offence,
i.e.:-
Imprisonment for a term up to 2 years, or
Fine up to Rs. 50,000, or
Both
Sec. 62:- Punishment for Vexatious Search
33. No court shall take cognizance of any offence u/s 62 or sub
sec.(1) of section 63 except with the previous sanction of
Central Government.
The Central Government shall, by an order either give
sanction within 90 days of the receipt of the request in this
behalf.
Sec. 64:- Cognizance of Offences
34. Any person wilfully and maliciously giving false information and so causing an arrest or a
search to be made under this act, then he shall be liable for punishment , i.e.:-
Imprisonment for a term up to 2 years, or
Fine up to Rs. 50,000, or
Both.
If any person, -
a) Being legally bound to state the truth of any matter relating to an offence u/s 3,
refuses to answer any question put to him by an authority in the exercise pf its
powers under this act, or
b) Refuses to sign any statement made by him in the course of any proceedings under
this act, which an authority may legally require to sign, or
c) To whom a summon is issued u/s 50 either to attend to give evidence or produce
books of account or other documents at a certain place and time, omits to attend or
produce books of account or documents at the place or time,
Then, he shall be liable for penalty, a sum which shall not be less than Rs.500 but
which may extend to RS. 10,000 for each such default or failure.
No order shall be passed by an authority unless the person on whom the penalty is
proposed to be imposed is given an opportunity of being heard in the matter by such
authority.
Sec. 63:- Punishment for False information
or failure to give information
35. Reporting Entity to maintain records (Sec 12)
Every Reporting Entity shall:-
a) Maintain a record of all transactions
b) Furnish all the information to the Director (whether
attempted or executed)
c) Verify the identity of its client
d) Identify the Beneficial owner
e) Maintain record of documents evidencing identity of
its clients and beneficial owners as well as account files
and business correspondence relating to its clients.
Every information maintained, furnished or verified shall
be kept confidential.
36. “ Reporting Entity” means a banking company, financial institution,
intermediary or a person carrying on a designated business or
profession.
“Value” means the fair market value of any property on the date of
its acquisition by any person, or if such date cannot be determined,
the date on which such property is possessed by such person.
“Banking Company” means
All Nationalized Banks, Private Indian Banks and Private Foreign
Banks
All Co-operative Banks viz primary Co-operative Banks, State
Co-operative Banks and Central (District Level) Co-operative
Banks
State Bank of India and its Associates and Subsidiaries
Regional Rural Banks
Reporting Entity to maintain records (Sec 12)…
37. “Financial Institution” means
Financial Institution as defined in Sec 45-I of the RBI Act namely
EXIM Bank, NABARD, NHB, SIDBI, IFCI Ltd., IDFC Ltd., IIBI Ltd.
And TFCI Ltd.
Insurance Companies
Hire Purchase Companies
Chit Fund Companies as defined in the Chit Funds Act.
“Intermediary” means person registered u/s 12 of the SEBI Act, 1992:-
Stock brokers
Sub- brokers
Share Transfer Agents
Registrars to Issue
Merchant Bankers
Underwriters
Portfolio Managers
Reporting Entity to maintain records (Sec 12)…
38. An Effort By:
CA Kirti Fatehpuria
Ramanand Goyal & Co.
Chartered Accountants
+919602796993
mail@rngca.com
www.rngca.com