There are two videos in PPT, where are black slides:
Video1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wxW8GP59Sq8
Video 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VcZF_DxQ5cU
India loses over $314 billion annually to tax evasion, including $314 billion from uncollected income taxes and $800 billion from corporate tax incentives. Tax evasion occurs through weak enforcement systems, corruption, complex laws, and methods like overstating expenses and underreporting income. While some large companies and trusts have been caught evading taxes, overall tax evasion remains a major problem as only about 36 million of India's 1.3 billion people pay income taxes. Efforts to curb evasion through new laws and whistleblower rewards have had limited success.
Tax avoidance means neglecting to pay taxes that are owed. It is commonly practiced by multinational companies using tax havens to hide profits. While some tax avoidance has existed since the 1920s, it has grown significantly in recent decades, costing governments $50-200 billion in lost revenue annually. Poor countries have struggled to raise sufficient tax revenue due to tax competition between governments and trade liberalization policies that shift more of the tax burden onto poor individuals through consumption taxes. Tax havens undermine market competition and capital investment by allowing wealthy individuals and companies to escape taxation, and enable political corruption through secret bank accounts.
Tax is a crucial revenue stream for administrations across the world.
While many agencies have already established processes for compliance and enforcement, a combination of avoidance and error is still costing governments billions.
Detection and Prevention measures provide the key to tackling these challenges
ethical issues in tax evasion. In business, theres always a situation where one has to choose one of the 2 things:
1) ethics 2) profits
one has to decide whether profits are more important than ethics
This document defines and compares tax evasion and tax avoidance. Tax evasion is illegal and involves intentionally avoiding taxes by not reporting all income or hiding funds. Tax avoidance uses legal tax deductions and loopholes to reduce tax liability. Causes of tax evasion include weak enforcement, corruption, complex laws, and high tax rates. Common evasion practices are under-reporting income, bribery, and lobbying governments. Tax avoidance uses legal deductions and planning to postpone or lower taxes owed. India loses $314 billion annually to tax evasion, which deprives the country of funds for infrastructure and reduces economic growth.
This document discusses different methods taxpayers can use to reduce their tax liability: tax evasion, tax avoidance, and tax planning. Tax evasion involves illegally hiding income or falsifying records. Tax avoidance aims to reduce taxes through legal but questionable loopholes. In contrast, tax planning makes legitimate use of exemptions, deductions, and other provisions in the tax code to lower tax burden. Proper tax planning is an encouraged way for taxpayers to minimize their liability within the law.
This document discusses tax evasion from the perspective of a forensic expert. It begins by defining tax evasion and tax avoidance, noting that the latter involves legally minimizing taxes while the former involves illegal means. Next, it compares tax evasion and avoidance and examines reasons for the tax gap in the UK. It then looks at global tax evasion by profession and discusses long-term remedies like tax planning and management. The document outlines ways that tax evasion occurs and who is responsible in India. It also examines some attempts at tax evasion during India's demonetization and concludes by emphasizing the importance of tax planning to curb evasion.
India loses over $314 billion annually to tax evasion, including $314 billion from uncollected income taxes and $800 billion from corporate tax incentives. Tax evasion occurs through weak enforcement systems, corruption, complex laws, and methods like overstating expenses and underreporting income. While some large companies and trusts have been caught evading taxes, overall tax evasion remains a major problem as only about 36 million of India's 1.3 billion people pay income taxes. Efforts to curb evasion through new laws and whistleblower rewards have had limited success.
Tax avoidance means neglecting to pay taxes that are owed. It is commonly practiced by multinational companies using tax havens to hide profits. While some tax avoidance has existed since the 1920s, it has grown significantly in recent decades, costing governments $50-200 billion in lost revenue annually. Poor countries have struggled to raise sufficient tax revenue due to tax competition between governments and trade liberalization policies that shift more of the tax burden onto poor individuals through consumption taxes. Tax havens undermine market competition and capital investment by allowing wealthy individuals and companies to escape taxation, and enable political corruption through secret bank accounts.
Tax is a crucial revenue stream for administrations across the world.
While many agencies have already established processes for compliance and enforcement, a combination of avoidance and error is still costing governments billions.
Detection and Prevention measures provide the key to tackling these challenges
ethical issues in tax evasion. In business, theres always a situation where one has to choose one of the 2 things:
1) ethics 2) profits
one has to decide whether profits are more important than ethics
This document defines and compares tax evasion and tax avoidance. Tax evasion is illegal and involves intentionally avoiding taxes by not reporting all income or hiding funds. Tax avoidance uses legal tax deductions and loopholes to reduce tax liability. Causes of tax evasion include weak enforcement, corruption, complex laws, and high tax rates. Common evasion practices are under-reporting income, bribery, and lobbying governments. Tax avoidance uses legal deductions and planning to postpone or lower taxes owed. India loses $314 billion annually to tax evasion, which deprives the country of funds for infrastructure and reduces economic growth.
This document discusses different methods taxpayers can use to reduce their tax liability: tax evasion, tax avoidance, and tax planning. Tax evasion involves illegally hiding income or falsifying records. Tax avoidance aims to reduce taxes through legal but questionable loopholes. In contrast, tax planning makes legitimate use of exemptions, deductions, and other provisions in the tax code to lower tax burden. Proper tax planning is an encouraged way for taxpayers to minimize their liability within the law.
This document discusses tax evasion from the perspective of a forensic expert. It begins by defining tax evasion and tax avoidance, noting that the latter involves legally minimizing taxes while the former involves illegal means. Next, it compares tax evasion and avoidance and examines reasons for the tax gap in the UK. It then looks at global tax evasion by profession and discusses long-term remedies like tax planning and management. The document outlines ways that tax evasion occurs and who is responsible in India. It also examines some attempts at tax evasion during India's demonetization and concludes by emphasizing the importance of tax planning to curb evasion.
TAX AVOIDANCE AND TAX EVASION -DIFFERENCE AND EFFECT ON INDIAN ECONOMY Sundar B N
Tax avoidance is the legal minimization of tax liability by taking advantage of loopholes and ambiguities in tax laws, while tax evasion is the illegal non-payment or underpayment of taxes by hiding income or making false claims. While tax avoidance is legal, tax evasion is a criminal offense. Tax evasion reduces government revenue and increases inflation, impacting India's economic growth and development. It also increases corruption and wealth inequality between rich and poor.
This document discusses tax evasion and avoidance. It defines tax as a financial charge imposed by governments to fund public expenditures. Direct taxes are levied on personal income, while indirect taxes are levied on goods and services. Tax evasion is illegally not paying taxes when they are due, while tax avoidance uses legal loopholes to reduce taxes owed. Common methods of evasion include failing to pay taxes, smuggling, and falsifying financial statements. Tax evasion harms economies by reducing government revenues. To reduce evasion, governments can simplify tax laws, increase awareness, and strengthen penalties for noncompliance.
Tax fraud occurs when an individual or entity underreports income or overstates deductions on a tax return to reduce the amount of taxes owed. In India, major areas of tax fraud include falsification of invoices, unreported income, and bribery of tax officials. The Indian government estimates an annual loss of 14 trillion rupees from tax evasion. Recent government efforts to curb fraud include new laws targeting undisclosed foreign assets, a proposed nationwide goods and services tax, and increased use of technology in tax administration. However, tax fraud remains a significant problem in India due to complex tax laws, weak enforcement, and corruption. Simplification of the tax system and improved monitoring are needed to further reduce the prevalence of tax evasion.
The document defines tax evasion as illegally avoiding paying true tax liability through intentional omissions or falsifications. Those caught face criminal charges and penalties. Tax avoidance refers to legally reducing taxes owed by taking advantage of deductions, credits, and loopholes within tax laws. While tax avoidance is legal, tax evasion is never legal and carries criminal consequences if caught. The document provides examples of common tax evasion and avoidance practices and clarifies the key difference that tax avoidance operates within legal tax frameworks, whereas tax evasion does not.
Tax avoidance is legal minimization of taxes through approved means like RRSP contributions or incorporating a business. Tax evasion is illegal non-reporting of income. People engage in both up to the point where marginal benefits equal marginal costs, taking advantage of techniques like postponing taxes, arbitraging across income streams and individuals. While avoidance diverts resources, evasion undermines the tax system and fairness. Higher taxes and penalties reduce evasion, while audits are also deterrent but costly.
Tax Evasion and Methods of Avoiding TaxAnkit Kumar
This document discusses tax evasion and avoidance. It provides data on various individuals' PTP scores and ways that people evade taxes such as smuggling, submitting false returns, and claiming personal expenses as business expenses. It also lists penalties for tax evasion ranging from 100-300% of unpaid taxes to Rs. 5000 for not filing returns. The document identifies limitations of the Indian tax structure that contribute to evasion, such as high taxation rates, corruption, and frequent changes in government. It defines tax avoidance as the legal exploitation of tax regulations to minimize taxes owed.
David Stewart Tax Evasion: What is tax evasion? What are tax evasion penalties? What are some celebrities who have been charged with tax evasion? Take a look!
Tax planning involves legally arranging one's financial affairs to minimize tax liability, while complying with all applicable tax laws. Tax avoidance uses artificial or dubious methods to reduce taxes in a manner that defeats the intent of tax statutes. Tax evasion illegally avoids taxes through actions like knowingly making untrue statements or omitting required information. The line between tax planning and avoidance is thin, with avoidance including an element of mala fide intent or use of "colorable devices" to circumvent the spirit of tax laws.
This document discusses tax evasion in the Philippines. It defines tax evasion as the criminal act of deliberately failing to pay tax liability. People who commit tax evasion face criminal charges and penalties such as jail time and fines. The document then discusses various tax revenues in the Philippines including income tax, excise tax, franchise taxes, and import duties. It provides examples of high-profile tax evasion cases in the country. Finally, it discusses what counts as tax evasion and common types of tax evasion such as tax fraud, abusive tax schemes, and employment tax fraud.
The document discusses various aspects of taxation in India including tax evasion, tax avoidance, and the role of tax administration.
It defines tax evasion as illegally reducing one's tax burden by underreporting income or overstating deductions/expenses. Tax avoidance uses legal tax deductions and exemptions to minimize tax liability. Penalties for tax evasion range from 100-300% of evaded taxes.
The document also summarizes key provisions of the Income Tax Act related to deductions that can help taxpayers lower their taxable income such as sections 80C, 80D, and double taxation avoidance agreements. It notes direct tax collections have increased after demonetization as the number of taxpayers has risen from 3 crore
This document discusses the difference between tax avoidance and tax evasion. Tax avoidance involves legally minimizing tax liability through legitimate tax planning methods and takes advantage of loopholes in tax laws. It does not involve malintent and carries no public disgrace. Tax evasion, on the other hand, involves illegally avoiding taxes through fraudulent means such as making false statements, omitting information, or not maintaining proper records. Tax evasion is unlawful and punishable under relevant laws. The key differences are that tax avoidance works within legal frameworks while tax evasion uses unfair methods to omit tax liability.
This document discusses different methods for taxpayers to minimize tax liability: tax planning, tax avoidance, and tax evasion. Tax planning involves legally taking advantage of exemptions, deductions, and rebates to reduce taxes. Tax avoidance also reduces taxes legally by exploiting loopholes. Tax evasion illegally underreports income or falsifies information to pay less tax than owed. The document provides examples of actions considered tax planning, such as certain investments, and tax evasion, like falsely claiming donations. Overall it aims to explain legal and illegal options and their objectives in paying the minimum required tax.
This document discusses international taxation. It defines international taxation as the study of tax on individuals or businesses subject to different countries' tax laws. It outlines the objectives of taxation as tax neutrality and tax equity. Tax neutrality means a tax scheme does not incentivize moving money abroad and treats income equally regardless of where it is earned. Tax equity means the same tax rate applies regardless of where in the world income is earned. The document also describes various types of taxes like income tax, withholding tax, value-added tax, and defines them.
Tax fraud involves deliberately underpaying taxes owed through dishonest means such as underreporting income, overstating deductions, or providing false information. Common methods of tax fraud include suppressing personal expenses, deliberately omitting income from business transactions, making false entries in books to hide unreported income or inflate expenses, and concealing receipt of income by not recording transactions. Large corporations may also commit tax fraud through practices like improper transfer pricing or window dressing financial reports. Individual tax fraud usually stems from rationalizations of high taxes and opportunities created by complex tax systems.
Individual income, payroll, and corporate income taxes cover about two-thirds of US government spending, with the remaining one-third financed by borrowing. In 2014, around 15% of government spending was expected to be financed through deficits. Tax expenditures, such as deductions, credits, and exclusions, have grown over time and now cost almost as much as total income tax revenue. Many tax expenditures function similarly to government spending programs.
This document discusses various tax planning strategies under Indian law. It defines tax planning as legally arranging one's financial affairs to minimize tax liability. Tax planning is legitimate if done within the law, unlike tax evasion which is illegal. The document outlines three common tax practices - planning, avoidance, and evasion. While avoidance is legal but aims to reduce taxes, evasion is illegal. It also discusses the importance of tax planning for expenses, investment, and economic stability. Areas of planning include strategies for individuals, setting up new businesses, and existing companies.
Taxes imposed on the earnings of organizations and individuals are income taxes. Marginal tax rate and flat tax rate. Marginal tax rates are harmful to the economy.
This document discusses fiscal policy and taxation systems in developing countries. It notes that fiscal policy uses government spending and revenue collection to influence the economy. The goals of fiscal policy include accelerating growth, maintaining price stability, reducing inequality, and generating jobs. It also discusses different types of taxes and revenues sources, as well as weaknesses of developing country tax systems like low collection rates, agricultural tax exemptions, and frequent changes. To improve, countries should lower high income tax rates, tax agriculture, promote a progressive system, and pursue stability and simplicity in tax rates and types.
Tax avoidance by corporations negatively impacts developing countries in three main ways:
1) It diminishes funds for public services and economic growth by reducing tax revenue. Developing countries lose out on large amounts needed for infrastructure and social programs.
2) By shifting profits to tax havens, corporations avoid paying their fair share and their social responsibility to the countries and societies that help them generate profits.
3) The practices undermine justice and fairness in societies by exacerbating inequality and poverty. International regulations have so far not adequately addressed this issue facing developing nations.
tax law should be reformed to encourage savings ?tripti4
This document argues against reforming tax laws to encourage saving by lowering taxes. It claims this would increase the government's budget deficit by reducing tax revenue while expenditure remains high. A large deficit would shift the tax burden to future generations and require the government to take on loans through deficit financing. Deficit financing, such as printing currency or government borrowing, reduces currency value, drives up interest rates, and makes credit more expensive. The document argues it is better to reduce the budget deficit in order to lower future taxes and borrowing, increase public confidence, and encourage higher savings and investment. Data from India is presented showing an inverse relationship between savings/investment and inflation/deficit.
IKEA's complex tax structure allows it to pay a low effective tax rate. It operates through a Dutch foundation and holding company based in the Netherlands. IKEA also uses contract manufacturing and franchising agreements to reduce its taxable income. However, some argue IKEA's aggressive tax avoidance strategies do not align with its responsibilities as a large multinational corporation. Governments and companies must work to balance tax systems and practices with corporate social responsibility.
TAX AVOIDANCE AND TAX EVASION -DIFFERENCE AND EFFECT ON INDIAN ECONOMY Sundar B N
Tax avoidance is the legal minimization of tax liability by taking advantage of loopholes and ambiguities in tax laws, while tax evasion is the illegal non-payment or underpayment of taxes by hiding income or making false claims. While tax avoidance is legal, tax evasion is a criminal offense. Tax evasion reduces government revenue and increases inflation, impacting India's economic growth and development. It also increases corruption and wealth inequality between rich and poor.
This document discusses tax evasion and avoidance. It defines tax as a financial charge imposed by governments to fund public expenditures. Direct taxes are levied on personal income, while indirect taxes are levied on goods and services. Tax evasion is illegally not paying taxes when they are due, while tax avoidance uses legal loopholes to reduce taxes owed. Common methods of evasion include failing to pay taxes, smuggling, and falsifying financial statements. Tax evasion harms economies by reducing government revenues. To reduce evasion, governments can simplify tax laws, increase awareness, and strengthen penalties for noncompliance.
Tax fraud occurs when an individual or entity underreports income or overstates deductions on a tax return to reduce the amount of taxes owed. In India, major areas of tax fraud include falsification of invoices, unreported income, and bribery of tax officials. The Indian government estimates an annual loss of 14 trillion rupees from tax evasion. Recent government efforts to curb fraud include new laws targeting undisclosed foreign assets, a proposed nationwide goods and services tax, and increased use of technology in tax administration. However, tax fraud remains a significant problem in India due to complex tax laws, weak enforcement, and corruption. Simplification of the tax system and improved monitoring are needed to further reduce the prevalence of tax evasion.
The document defines tax evasion as illegally avoiding paying true tax liability through intentional omissions or falsifications. Those caught face criminal charges and penalties. Tax avoidance refers to legally reducing taxes owed by taking advantage of deductions, credits, and loopholes within tax laws. While tax avoidance is legal, tax evasion is never legal and carries criminal consequences if caught. The document provides examples of common tax evasion and avoidance practices and clarifies the key difference that tax avoidance operates within legal tax frameworks, whereas tax evasion does not.
Tax avoidance is legal minimization of taxes through approved means like RRSP contributions or incorporating a business. Tax evasion is illegal non-reporting of income. People engage in both up to the point where marginal benefits equal marginal costs, taking advantage of techniques like postponing taxes, arbitraging across income streams and individuals. While avoidance diverts resources, evasion undermines the tax system and fairness. Higher taxes and penalties reduce evasion, while audits are also deterrent but costly.
Tax Evasion and Methods of Avoiding TaxAnkit Kumar
This document discusses tax evasion and avoidance. It provides data on various individuals' PTP scores and ways that people evade taxes such as smuggling, submitting false returns, and claiming personal expenses as business expenses. It also lists penalties for tax evasion ranging from 100-300% of unpaid taxes to Rs. 5000 for not filing returns. The document identifies limitations of the Indian tax structure that contribute to evasion, such as high taxation rates, corruption, and frequent changes in government. It defines tax avoidance as the legal exploitation of tax regulations to minimize taxes owed.
David Stewart Tax Evasion: What is tax evasion? What are tax evasion penalties? What are some celebrities who have been charged with tax evasion? Take a look!
Tax planning involves legally arranging one's financial affairs to minimize tax liability, while complying with all applicable tax laws. Tax avoidance uses artificial or dubious methods to reduce taxes in a manner that defeats the intent of tax statutes. Tax evasion illegally avoids taxes through actions like knowingly making untrue statements or omitting required information. The line between tax planning and avoidance is thin, with avoidance including an element of mala fide intent or use of "colorable devices" to circumvent the spirit of tax laws.
This document discusses tax evasion in the Philippines. It defines tax evasion as the criminal act of deliberately failing to pay tax liability. People who commit tax evasion face criminal charges and penalties such as jail time and fines. The document then discusses various tax revenues in the Philippines including income tax, excise tax, franchise taxes, and import duties. It provides examples of high-profile tax evasion cases in the country. Finally, it discusses what counts as tax evasion and common types of tax evasion such as tax fraud, abusive tax schemes, and employment tax fraud.
The document discusses various aspects of taxation in India including tax evasion, tax avoidance, and the role of tax administration.
It defines tax evasion as illegally reducing one's tax burden by underreporting income or overstating deductions/expenses. Tax avoidance uses legal tax deductions and exemptions to minimize tax liability. Penalties for tax evasion range from 100-300% of evaded taxes.
The document also summarizes key provisions of the Income Tax Act related to deductions that can help taxpayers lower their taxable income such as sections 80C, 80D, and double taxation avoidance agreements. It notes direct tax collections have increased after demonetization as the number of taxpayers has risen from 3 crore
This document discusses the difference between tax avoidance and tax evasion. Tax avoidance involves legally minimizing tax liability through legitimate tax planning methods and takes advantage of loopholes in tax laws. It does not involve malintent and carries no public disgrace. Tax evasion, on the other hand, involves illegally avoiding taxes through fraudulent means such as making false statements, omitting information, or not maintaining proper records. Tax evasion is unlawful and punishable under relevant laws. The key differences are that tax avoidance works within legal frameworks while tax evasion uses unfair methods to omit tax liability.
This document discusses different methods for taxpayers to minimize tax liability: tax planning, tax avoidance, and tax evasion. Tax planning involves legally taking advantage of exemptions, deductions, and rebates to reduce taxes. Tax avoidance also reduces taxes legally by exploiting loopholes. Tax evasion illegally underreports income or falsifies information to pay less tax than owed. The document provides examples of actions considered tax planning, such as certain investments, and tax evasion, like falsely claiming donations. Overall it aims to explain legal and illegal options and their objectives in paying the minimum required tax.
This document discusses international taxation. It defines international taxation as the study of tax on individuals or businesses subject to different countries' tax laws. It outlines the objectives of taxation as tax neutrality and tax equity. Tax neutrality means a tax scheme does not incentivize moving money abroad and treats income equally regardless of where it is earned. Tax equity means the same tax rate applies regardless of where in the world income is earned. The document also describes various types of taxes like income tax, withholding tax, value-added tax, and defines them.
Tax fraud involves deliberately underpaying taxes owed through dishonest means such as underreporting income, overstating deductions, or providing false information. Common methods of tax fraud include suppressing personal expenses, deliberately omitting income from business transactions, making false entries in books to hide unreported income or inflate expenses, and concealing receipt of income by not recording transactions. Large corporations may also commit tax fraud through practices like improper transfer pricing or window dressing financial reports. Individual tax fraud usually stems from rationalizations of high taxes and opportunities created by complex tax systems.
Individual income, payroll, and corporate income taxes cover about two-thirds of US government spending, with the remaining one-third financed by borrowing. In 2014, around 15% of government spending was expected to be financed through deficits. Tax expenditures, such as deductions, credits, and exclusions, have grown over time and now cost almost as much as total income tax revenue. Many tax expenditures function similarly to government spending programs.
This document discusses various tax planning strategies under Indian law. It defines tax planning as legally arranging one's financial affairs to minimize tax liability. Tax planning is legitimate if done within the law, unlike tax evasion which is illegal. The document outlines three common tax practices - planning, avoidance, and evasion. While avoidance is legal but aims to reduce taxes, evasion is illegal. It also discusses the importance of tax planning for expenses, investment, and economic stability. Areas of planning include strategies for individuals, setting up new businesses, and existing companies.
Taxes imposed on the earnings of organizations and individuals are income taxes. Marginal tax rate and flat tax rate. Marginal tax rates are harmful to the economy.
This document discusses fiscal policy and taxation systems in developing countries. It notes that fiscal policy uses government spending and revenue collection to influence the economy. The goals of fiscal policy include accelerating growth, maintaining price stability, reducing inequality, and generating jobs. It also discusses different types of taxes and revenues sources, as well as weaknesses of developing country tax systems like low collection rates, agricultural tax exemptions, and frequent changes. To improve, countries should lower high income tax rates, tax agriculture, promote a progressive system, and pursue stability and simplicity in tax rates and types.
Tax avoidance by corporations negatively impacts developing countries in three main ways:
1) It diminishes funds for public services and economic growth by reducing tax revenue. Developing countries lose out on large amounts needed for infrastructure and social programs.
2) By shifting profits to tax havens, corporations avoid paying their fair share and their social responsibility to the countries and societies that help them generate profits.
3) The practices undermine justice and fairness in societies by exacerbating inequality and poverty. International regulations have so far not adequately addressed this issue facing developing nations.
tax law should be reformed to encourage savings ?tripti4
This document argues against reforming tax laws to encourage saving by lowering taxes. It claims this would increase the government's budget deficit by reducing tax revenue while expenditure remains high. A large deficit would shift the tax burden to future generations and require the government to take on loans through deficit financing. Deficit financing, such as printing currency or government borrowing, reduces currency value, drives up interest rates, and makes credit more expensive. The document argues it is better to reduce the budget deficit in order to lower future taxes and borrowing, increase public confidence, and encourage higher savings and investment. Data from India is presented showing an inverse relationship between savings/investment and inflation/deficit.
IKEA's complex tax structure allows it to pay a low effective tax rate. It operates through a Dutch foundation and holding company based in the Netherlands. IKEA also uses contract manufacturing and franchising agreements to reduce its taxable income. However, some argue IKEA's aggressive tax avoidance strategies do not align with its responsibilities as a large multinational corporation. Governments and companies must work to balance tax systems and practices with corporate social responsibility.
This is a famous tax avoidance strategy adopted by renowned multinationals like Apple, Google etc. This unique arrangement will leave you amazed and it is also very informative. It tells us about the loop holes in the legal systems which are sometimes utilised by business entities to increase profits.
This document discusses tax planning, avoidance, evasion and management. Tax planning is arranging one's affairs to minimize tax liability legally by taking deductions. Tax management refers to complying with tax laws by maintaining records and filing returns. Tax avoidance legally reduces taxes by claiming exemptions, while tax evasion illegally avoids taxes by omitting information or submitting false statements, and can result in penalties.
Starbucks has achieved success through several factors:
1) Their unconventional marketing strategy focuses on high quality products and customer experience rather than traditional advertising.
2) Strategic expansion establishes hubs in major cities before expanding to surrounding areas, allowing them to quickly achieve market dominance.
3) While threats from competitors exist, Starbucks differentiates itself through its brand image and emphasis on consistency in customer experience across all stores.
1) The document discusses building a sustainable tax base in Zimbabwe's deflationary economic environment.
2) A sustainable tax system should be fair, simple, equitable, and ensure those who can afford to pay the most taxes do so.
3) Initiatives to build a sustainable tax base include anti-corruption campaigns, automating processes, increasing the number of taxpayers, and supporting industry.
1 STARBUCKS SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND TAX AVOIDANCE .docxShiraPrater50
Starbucks faced public backlash in the UK over its tax avoidance practices. While Starbucks portrayed itself as socially responsible, it had paid UK corporate income taxes only once in 15 years of UK operations. Through legal tax avoidance methods like royalty payments, transfer pricing, and inter-company debt, Starbucks was able to shift most taxable income earned in the UK to other jurisdictions with lower tax rates. This allowed Starbucks to grow its profitable UK business while minimizing the taxes it paid in the UK.
Here are the key points regarding the relationship between tax avoidance and corporate social responsibility/ethical behavior:
- There is an ongoing debate about whether aggressive tax avoidance aligns with corporate social responsibility and ethical business conduct.
- Corporate social responsibility refers to companies taking responsibility for the social and economic impact of their operations on communities. This includes contributing to public welfare.
- Ethical business behavior refers to companies acting in accordance with generally accepted moral and professional standards of conduct.
- Tax avoidance uses legal methods and loopholes to minimize tax obligations. Tax evasion is illegal.
- Governments argue aggressive tax avoidance deprives them of revenue that could fund public services. Critics say it contradicts the spirit of contributing to society
1.Use a consumer choice to explain and illustrate theexcess burden o.pdfameershoe
1.Use a consumer choice to explain and illustrate theexcess burden of a proportional tax on a
income.
2. Explain the neo-classical model of investment by a firm. Use the model to analyze the impact
of the corporate income tax on the firm\'s investment choice and its corporate financial structure.
Briefly explain how the Mirrlees report proposes to eliminate the financial structure bias inherent
in current tax structure.
Solution
1. In consumption based economy which we are in right now, Consumer choice is no.1 priority.
Governments have actually lost their way around collection of taxes so most of the developing
and developed countrires today actually want to tax everything which is under their control.
Proportional tax is no-exception of this model,
Proportional tax is most harmful tax model just because people are actually fined for earned
more, this has clearly directly translated into economy where companies know even if they rise
the package of the employee it just goes away for taxes so they simply do not rise salary of
employee at all.
2. There are so many different types of taxes on the firms. When a firm decides to invest it must
battle with structure of taxation in the economy all the way from utility taxes it has to pay to
federal taxes, state taxes etc. Some companies like accenture have actually shifted their head
offices out of america to battle this complex tax-structures because they hardly make any money
after pay off all the taxes. Big companies have more obligation to pay taxes because there is tax
structure which does not permit them to make such money. Mirrlees actually proposes to
eliminate double taxation in the economy. He proposed model in which they could realistically
reform UKs tax policy.
The document discusses various perspectives on corporate taxation and citizenship. It describes how taxes are essential but some corporations avoid paying their fair share through legal tax minimization strategies or even evasion. While tax planning is legitimate, cases like UBS, KPMG, and Walmart show how companies claim high ethics but engage in questionable tax avoidance that lacks transparency. Ultimately, the only relevant factor is how much tax a company actually pays rather than how it pays it.
This document discusses tax fraud and corruption in the tech industry, focusing on several major companies. It provides background on key concepts like tax evasion, avoidance, and corruption. It then examines issues at Samsung, IBM, and Siemens. Samsung has faced antitrust concerns and a major corruption scandal. IBM is accused of using tax avoidance strategies like the "Dutch Sandwich" and storing profits offshore to lower its tax bill. Siemens had a major corruption scandal in the 2000s, resulting in billions in fines for bribery.
1. The document discusses the role of government in promoting economic progress by protecting individual rights and providing certain goods, but argues that government is not well-suited to correct economic issues or redistribute wealth.
2. It proposes private savings accounts as an alternative to social security, noting that such programs in other countries like Chile were very successful and created real wealth for citizens.
3. If social security is not reformed, the document warns that taxes will have to be greatly increased to unsustainable levels, putting pressure on policies like euthanasia of less productive citizens.
Taxation on associations and procedures and camucatireshmabkr91
This document provides an overview of tax careers in the UK. It discusses the different types of taxes that contribute to the UK government budget, including income tax, corporation tax, VAT, and council tax. It then describes the roles of HM Revenue & Customs and professional bodies in tax administration and setting standards. The document outlines the skills and qualities needed for tax careers, potential employers, salaries, and the roles and responsibilities of tax professionals. It aims to dispel myths about tax careers and promotes the benefits of obtaining professional qualifications.
This document provides an overview of entrepreneurship and small and medium enterprises (SMEs) from a national and international perspective. It examines the economic significance of startups and SMEs, comparing their role in employment and GDP across countries. It also reviews common challenges faced by SMEs, such as low survival rates, regulatory burdens, and difficulties obtaining financing for growth. Government policies to support SMEs through reduced taxes, regulations, and aid programs are discussed.
The document discusses the marketing strategies used by Airtel and Vodafone in India. It outlines the services provided by both companies, including mobile services, fixed line phones, broadband, and more. It then compares the marketing strategies employed by Airtel and Vodafone to gain market share, such as Airtel focusing on value-added services and Vodafone launching an advertising campaign around the Indian Premier League cricket tournament to promote its services. The analysis examines how the two major competitors have challenged each other through different marketing approaches.
Thought Leadership Lecture 2015 - Jeremy SherwoodJeremy Sherwood
The document discusses why tax systems are so complex, the economic costs of complexity, and strategies for effective tax simplification reform. It notes that tax complexity has increased over time due to political pressures, special interests, and a lack of focus on usability. However, simplification efforts can work by gaining government buy-in, moving quickly with small achievable reforms, and anticipating opposition from potential "losers" under reform.
Tax investigation is an inspection of taxpayer records and documents to ensure the correct amount of reported income and taxes are paid according to tax laws. Investigations only occur when there is clear evidence a taxpayer is deliberately avoiding taxes or committing tax fraud. During investigations, correspondence between tax authorities and taxpayer representatives must be on a "without prejudice" basis, except in criminal tax cases where notes and recordings can be used in litigation. Upon completion of a civil tax investigation, a settlement agreement is entered into between the tax authority director general and the taxpayer.
Why Ireland Has Attracted Inward Foreign Direct Investment...Victoria Burke
The articles discuss the Republican tax plan that aims to cut individual and corporate tax rates significantly to spur economic growth, however Democrats argue it will mostly benefit the wealthy. GDP growth increased to 3.1% in the second quarter attributed to personal consumption, investments and exports. However, recent hurricanes are expected to negatively impact the economy in the next quarter and the long term effects of tax cuts on the budget deficit and industries are uncertain.
NERI Seminar - An examination of Tax Shifting and "Harmful Taxes"NevinInstitute
This document discusses harmful taxes and tax shifting. It summarizes the dominant view that corporate taxes are the most harmful for growth, followed by personal income taxes, then consumption taxes, with property taxes being the least harmful. It examines trends in taxation, including cuts to income and corporate tax rates. While there is some validity to tax hierarchies, designing a good tax system requires considering multiple principles like equity, efficiency, and revenue generation. Simply shifting to less harmful taxes may be regressive, and a mix of taxes along with understanding their interactions is most appropriate.
This document provides an overview of tax havens. It defines tax havens as jurisdictions that offer favorable tax rates and policies to non-residents. There are three main types: offshore financial centers, low or no tax jurisdictions, and secret jurisdictions. While tax havens provide benefits like lower taxes and confidentiality, they are criticized for facilitating tax evasion and harming developing countries. Recent efforts to curb tax havens include multilateral initiatives from bodies like the OECD and bilateral tax information sharing agreements between countries. Case studies of Apple, Amazon, and Google highlight how major companies have used tax havens like Ireland, Luxembourg, and Bermuda to reduce their tax burdens, leading to investigations and calls for tax repayment.
This document summarizes and advocates for the FairTax plan, which would abolish all federal income taxes and replace them with a 23% national sales tax. It argues that the current tax system is overly complex, discourages work and economic growth. The FairTax would be simple, transparent and visible to taxpayers. It would tax consumption and ensure low-income households pay no taxes on basic necessities through a monthly tax rebate. Supporters believe the FairTax would boost the economy, make U.S. products more competitive, and generate the same tax revenue as the current system in a more efficient manner.
How did tax get so complex? In the 1950s Australia had a tax system made up of around 1080 pages of tax law.
Since then, Governments have identified gaps, addressed omissions, and attempted to adapt the tax system to changes in business and society.
Our tax system is now a complex patchwork of rules.
The document discusses the relationship between Dannon, a subsidiary of Danone, and its approach to corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives in the U.S. market. Dannon views the U.S. as a growth market and uses CSR programs in its customer communications. CSR initiatives are designed to embrace values around human development and the environment. The communication strategy considers both corporate and local brands to increase consumer confidence through CSR messaging.
Here is a summary of the sources and objectives of modern income tax statutes:
The primary sources of US tax law are Congress and the Treasury Department. Congress has the power to initiate tax legislation through the House of Representatives, but all tax bills must pass both the House and Senate and be signed by the President to become law. While Congress establishes the overarching tax policies, it often leaves details of legislation to the Treasury Department to adopt through regulations. The objectives of modern income tax statutes are to raise revenue for the government, promote social welfare programs, and influence the economy through incentives and penalties within the tax code. Tax laws aim to fairly and efficiently collect taxes from individuals and businesses based on their ability to pay.
0112NSW_SME_NSW_Tax_Symposium_Brochure_The-Tax-InstituteLisa To
This document provides an agenda and details for the SME Tax Symposium taking place on November 19-20, 2015. The symposium will focus on relevant tax issues for small and medium enterprises, and will include sessions on preparing a business for sale, structuring business sales and purchases, inheritance tax issues, property development taxes, international tax, small business entity benefits and employee compensation. It outlines the session topics, presenters, times and provides brief biographies of the presenter experts.
"Does Foreign Direct Investment Negatively Affect Preservation of Culture in the Global South? Case Studies in Thailand and Cambodia."
Do elements of globalization, such as Foreign Direct Investment (FDI), negatively affect the ability of countries in the Global South to preserve their culture? This research aims to answer this question by employing a cross-sectional comparative case study analysis utilizing methods of difference. Thailand and Cambodia are compared as they are in the same region and have a similar culture. The metric of difference between Thailand and Cambodia is their ability to preserve their culture. This ability is operationalized by their respective attitudes towards FDI; Thailand imposes stringent regulations and limitations on FDI while Cambodia does not hesitate to accept most FDI and imposes fewer limitations. The evidence from this study suggests that FDI from globally influential countries with high gross domestic products (GDPs) (e.g. China, U.S.) challenges the ability of countries with lower GDPs (e.g. Cambodia) to protect their culture. Furthermore, the ability, or lack thereof, of the receiving countries to protect their culture is amplified by the existence and implementation of restrictive FDI policies imposed by their governments.
My study abroad in Bali, Indonesia, inspired this research topic as I noticed how globalization is changing the culture of its people. I learned their language and way of life which helped me understand the beauty and importance of cultural preservation. I believe we could all benefit from learning new perspectives as they could help us ideate solutions to contemporary issues and empathize with others.
Falcon stands out as a top-tier P2P Invoice Discounting platform in India, bridging esteemed blue-chip companies and eager investors. Our goal is to transform the investment landscape in India by establishing a comprehensive destination for borrowers and investors with diverse profiles and needs, all while minimizing risk. What sets Falcon apart is the elimination of intermediaries such as commercial banks and depository institutions, allowing investors to enjoy higher yields.
OJP data from firms like Vicinity Jobs have emerged as a complement to traditional sources of labour demand data, such as the Job Vacancy and Wages Survey (JVWS). Ibrahim Abuallail, PhD Candidate, University of Ottawa, presented research relating to bias in OJPs and a proposed approach to effectively adjust OJP data to complement existing official data (such as from the JVWS) and improve the measurement of labour demand.
1. Elemental Economics - Introduction to mining.pdfNeal Brewster
After this first you should: Understand the nature of mining; have an awareness of the industry’s boundaries, corporate structure and size; appreciation the complex motivations and objectives of the industries’ various participants; know how mineral reserves are defined and estimated, and how they evolve over time.
STREETONOMICS: Exploring the Uncharted Territories of Informal Markets throug...sameer shah
Delve into the world of STREETONOMICS, where a team of 7 enthusiasts embarks on a journey to understand unorganized markets. By engaging with a coffee street vendor and crafting questionnaires, this project uncovers valuable insights into consumer behavior and market dynamics in informal settings."
Economic Risk Factor Update: June 2024 [SlideShare]Commonwealth
May’s reports showed signs of continued economic growth, said Sam Millette, director, fixed income, in his latest Economic Risk Factor Update.
For more market updates, subscribe to The Independent Market Observer at https://blog.commonwealth.com/independent-market-observer.
2. Why this topic?
Because it’s a widespread phenomenon, mostly among the
large companies, thereby affecting the quality of public servicies
and sometimes also the economical security of the states!
6. Why immoral?
Because they use all
the public services
without paying the the
price for it, as we do.
education
health system security
well trained labor force
infrastructure
13. Anyway, don't get confused
Tax planning Tax avoidance
=Even if sometimes „tax planning”
can be a cover for „tax avoidance”
14. is bending the rules of the tax
system to gain a tax advantage
that Parliament never intended.
Tax avoidance
involves using tax reliefs for the
purpose for which they were
intended.
Tax planning
25. United Kindom
First opening: 1998
Stores: 735
Sales*: ₤ 3bn
*reported (Total Sales until year 2012)
Tax paid: ₤ 8.6m
Tax as % of sales: 0.3
26. United Kindom
In the last 5 years*,
Starbucks paid in UK
₤ 0corporation tax
*from 2007 to 2012
27. They report
losses in UK, all
financial reports to
HM Revenue &
Customs being
this way
US executives of the
Seattle company
claimed in telephone
calls with investors,
transcripts of which
have been seen by the
The Guardian, that the
UK business
was profitable
while
28. The contradictions highlight legal tax-avoidance
tactics used by multinational companies by loading
UK subsidiaries with debts from other parts of the
business based in countries with lower tax thresholds
29. Admission of immoral practice?
After 5 years of not paying any corporation
tax, Starbucks finally „woke up”!
In 2013 they paid
₤10m, promising
to pay another
₤10m in 2014.