Clinical strategies in the management of Alcohol Use Disorders. Lundbeck Inst...Antoni Gual
Lecture given in an Addiction workshop sponsored by the Lundbeck Institute in Copenhaguen, march 18th, 2015. Attended by psychiatrists from Germany, Belgium, Romania and France.
Clinical strategies in the management of Alcohol Use Disorders. Lundbeck Inst...Antoni Gual
Lecture given in an Addiction workshop sponsored by the Lundbeck Institute in Copenhaguen, march 18th, 2015. Attended by psychiatrists from Germany, Belgium, Romania and France.
Neuropharmachology having difficult conversations about medicationsMichael Changaris
This slideshow explores the neurobiologcial structures under pinning clinical change. Overview of pharmacodynamics and pharmacokenetics, and neurotransmitters. Problem based learning exploration of difficult conversations with patients about psychopharmacology and medication management.
Integrated Behavioral Health: Approaches to hypertension, toxic stress, ment...Michael Changaris
•TEAM BASED CARE: Team-based care incorporates a multidisciplinary team, centered on the patient, to optimize the quality of hypertension care. •TEAM PLAYERS: Team-based care includes the patient, the primary care clinician, and other professionals such as nurses, pharmacists, physician assistants, dieticians, social workers, and community health workers, each with pre-defined responsibilities in care. •OUTCOMES: Review and Meta-analysis of 100 randomized trials determined that team-based care is highly effective compared with other strategies for BP control.
Neuropharmachology having difficult conversations about medicationsMichael Changaris
This slideshow explores the neurobiologcial structures under pinning clinical change. Overview of pharmacodynamics and pharmacokenetics, and neurotransmitters. Problem based learning exploration of difficult conversations with patients about psychopharmacology and medication management.
Integrated Behavioral Health: Approaches to hypertension, toxic stress, ment...Michael Changaris
•TEAM BASED CARE: Team-based care incorporates a multidisciplinary team, centered on the patient, to optimize the quality of hypertension care. •TEAM PLAYERS: Team-based care includes the patient, the primary care clinician, and other professionals such as nurses, pharmacists, physician assistants, dieticians, social workers, and community health workers, each with pre-defined responsibilities in care. •OUTCOMES: Review and Meta-analysis of 100 randomized trials determined that team-based care is highly effective compared with other strategies for BP control.
Rings In (Candidate) Drugs - Case StoriesJonas Boström
Selected project impacts from over a decade of using insights from computational chemistry Focus on heterocyclic rings in candidate drugs discovered at AstraZeneca/CVMD and the strategies used in their design. The case stories will include a wide variety of examples, such as (i) replacing unwanted functional groups like acids and esters with heterocyclic rings, (ii) using rings for geometrical reasons and (iii) using heterocyclic rings to fine-tune electrostatics to obtain improved properties. In most cases the key computational approach for designing candidate drugs has been the use of shape and electrostatic comparisons between molecules. The role of luck is also discussed.
As a requirement of the MYP programme (an international scholastic programme adopted by international schools around the world), it's needed to fulfill a "personal project". A personal project is an individual project and should focus on a topic of interest for the student.
I've decided to do my personal project on raising awareness to teenagers about cannabis. As I myself am a teenager in the Netherlands, the presentation includes statistics mainly for Holland, only.
Of course, elaborations of the bullet points on the slides would've been made had this presentation been oral, as well.
Thanks for watching and please comment and give feedback!
Pier
Harder-to-treat and more lethal tubercle bacilli continue to emerge across the globe, especially in the African region. Together with HIV, these infectious killers continue to have profound effects on the productive workforce in different countries. The deck is a brief overview of developments in disease management and research, with an emphasis on medications and vaccines.
A presentation by Dr. Swamy Venuturupalli, MD, FACR from Lupus LA's annual patient education conference at Cedars Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles, CA.
Dr. Swamy Venuturupalli is a board-certified rheumatologist practicing in Los Angeles. He is Clinical Chief of the Division of Rheumatology at Cedars Sinai Medical Center and Associate Clinical Professor of Medicine at UCLA as well as being Editor-in-Chief of Current Rheumatology Reports.
Dr. Venuturupalli grew up in Bombay, India, the son of two physicians. In 1995, he received his medical degree from the prestigious Topiwala National Medical College in Bombay. Dr. Venuturupalli completed his residency in Internal Medicine, with distinction, at the Upstate Medical University in Syracuse, NY. Following his residency, he was appointed Chief Resident in the department of medicine at Syracuse University, where he was in charge of managing and training 65 residents.
In 1999, Dr. Venuturupalli moved to Los Angeles for a combined fellowship in health services research with UCLA's School of Medicine, the RAND Corporation, and the Greater Los Angeles Veteran's Administration Medical Center. Along with his cohort, he conducted research on complementary and alternative medicine, publishing studies on Ayurvedic medicine, dietary supplements, and mind-body medicine. Dr. Venuturupalli then completed a rheumatology fellowship at the UCLA-Olive View medical program in 2002.
Dr. Venuturupalli's role as research investigator includes over a hundred clinical trials involving conditions such as lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory muscle diseases, ankylosing spondylitis, etc. He participates in ongoing rheumatology research with Dr. Daniel Wallace, a leading physician in the field, at the Cedars Sinai Division of Rheumatology. Dr. Venuturupalli lectures frequently to the general public and to the staff and faculty at Cedars Sinai Hospital on various topics in rheumatology, including alternative and complementary medicine. He was also recently invited to give grand rounds at Cedars on topics such as antiphospholipid syndrome and myositis. Dr. Venuturupalli has authored numerous text-book chapters, is published in peer-reviewed journals, and is currently the Editor-in-Chief of the journal Current Rheumatology Reviews.
For the past eight years, Dr. Venuturupalli has held a private practice in association with a group of 4 rheumatologists. Dr. Venuturupalli is highly regarded by his colleagues and is a sought-after teacher in his field of expertise. He has served as the past president of the Southern California Rheumatology Society, a non-profit professional organization of rheumatologists focusing on professional education.
Areas of expertise: Inflammatory Muscle disease, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, Anti- Phospholipid syndrome, Sjogren's syndrome, Osteoporosis, Vasculitis.
The world is watching as Canada becomes one of the first countries to legalize recreational cannabis, and there's still much we don't know about how this huge social change will affect our lives.
In this webinar, Dr. Chris Wilkes, MD, from UCalgary's Cumming School of Medicine reviews what the research to date tells us about the impact of cannabis on the brain, and what needs further study. Dr. Fiona Clement, PhD, whose team compiled the Cannabis evidence series for the Alberta provincial government, looks at the factors informing government policy, including evidence from other jurisdictions that have legalized marijuana.
Watch the full webinar recording at https://go.ucalgary.ca/2018-07-11URNAP-WhatdoeslegalizedcannabismeanforCanadians_LPRegistration.html
When is it time for a new cancer treatment, and how should patients make these difficult decisions? Rachel Yung, MD, provides an overview of what to consider when making difficult treatment choices.
Medical Marijuana and Clinical Oncology in 2022"The Good the Bad and the Potentially Ugly"
Marijuana/cannabinoids are particularly appealing for oncology patients offering the possibility of a single medication to encompass a variety of problems, such as pain, nausea, anorexia, sleep disorders , and anxiety.
Dr. Malcolm Brigden - University of Calgary - Canada.
The Green Light - Medicinal Cannabis in New York (Full Version)
1. The Green Light
Medicinal Cannabis in New York
Authored/Presented by Dave Porter, Pharm.D Candidate
via Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences
Thursday, February 12th, 2015
2. Presentation Outline
• Background
• History
• A Case Study: Charlotte’s Web
• Science and Studies
• Proposed NYS Regulations
• Legal Challenges
• Other Schedule I Research
• Q&A Session
2
3. But First…
• Things I WILL NOT be doing in this presentation:
– Arguing for the legalization of recreational cannabis
– Supporting use of medicinal cannabis by non-patients
– Using street slang like pot, bud, kush, dope, chronic, etc.
• Things I WILL be doing in this presentation:
– Presenting a professional evidence-based viewpoint,
supporting a reclassification of cannabis to Schedule II
– Reviewing published clinical studies
– Reviewing New York’s proposed regulations (2014)
– Withholding personal opinions, unless prompted
3
4. General and Historical Background
• The cannabis plant (Cannabis sativa, C. indica and
C. ruderalis) is an annual flowering herb
– It has more than 60 unique compounds (~480 total)
– Δ-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) is psychoactive
– Cannabidiol (CBD) is not; may oppose some THC effects
• Earliest recorded use of medicinal cannabis (“ma”)
dates back to 2900BC – Emperor Fu Hsi
– Emperor Shen Nung discovers healing property (2700BC)
• Used as sacramental, medicinal or recreational drug
– Arab physician Ibn Wahshiyah – potentially poisonous?
4
6. History in the USA
• 1851 – United States Pharmacopoeia (USP) lists Cannabis
sativa as a legitimate drug with many uses
• 1864 – USP described methods of extracting alkaloids
• 1911 – Massachusetts is first State to ban cannabis outright
• 1937 – Marijuana Tax Act placed a tax on cannabis products
• 1970 – Controlled Substances Act; Schedule I classification
• 1996 – California legalizes cannabis for medicinal purposes
• 1998 – 105th Congress upholds Schedule I classification
• 1999 – IOM’s Marijuana and Medicine report
• 2002-2005 – Gonsales vs. Raich trial
• 2012 – WA and CO legalize recreational cannabis
• 2014 – New York passes the Compassionate Care Act 6
7. Case Study – Charlotte Figi
• Charlotte is a 5 year old female with Dravet Syndrome, a
rare and severe form of profoundly treatment-resistant
epilepsy. She suffers ~300 grand mal seizures per week.
Unable to walk, talk and eat independently. Parents have
tried all anti-seizure drugs indicated for Charlotte’s
condition, as well as some experimental ones, to little or no
effect. Brain damage and cognitive decline noted. Last-
line brain surgery or induction of a medical coma?
• Parents found a video of a boy with severe epilepsy treated
and controlled with an oil high in cannabidiol (CBD)
• Parents met with >100 doctors before they found two who
would recommend medicinal cannabis to treat Charlotte7
9. • Charlotte’s Parents obtained oil (“R4”) high in CBD
– Seizure rate decreased from 300/week to 1-2/week
• High CBD/Low THC cannabis was rare in Colorado
• Parents contacted the Stanley family, who own one
of the largest cannabis dispensaries in Colorado
– They modified one of their existing strains of product to
be even higher in CBD
Case Study – Charlotte Figi
– They called it “Charlotte’s Web”
– Extracted into oils called “Alepsia”
and “Realm Oil” (~30:1 CBD:THC)
– Realm of Caring Foundation
10. Case Study – Charlotte Figi
• Charlotte today:
– Only has 2-3 seizures/month and regained the
ability to walk, talk, eat, and lead a normal life
• “Charlotte’s Web” is now nationally known
– Featured by Dr. Sanjay Gupta (CNN’s Weed)
– 9,000 patients on the waiting list as of
September 2014*
11. Prevalence of Use and Legal Status
• 23 States (plus the District of Columbia and Guam)
have legislature in place for medicinal cannabis
– Some States have legalized it recently, but have no
programs implemented yet (MD, MN, NH, NY)
• Estimates of over 2,000,000* medicinal cannabis
patients in the USA in October 2014
– * Some States have voluntary registration (CA, ME) or do
not have any registration policies (WA)
• 11 States (AL, FL, IA, KY, MS, MO, NC, SC, TN, UT,
WI) have passed laws legalizing some aspect*
11
12. ProCon. Medical Marijuana Pros and Cons. Last updated 11/13/2014. Available from: <http://medicalmarijuana.procon.org/>.
13. Marinol® (Dronabinol, THC) Review*
• MOA:
– Agonist at endogenous cannabinoid receptors CB1 and CB2
– Signal transduction effects through GPCR in the PAG, RVM
and dorsal horn, decreasing excitability of neurons
– May act in the vomiting center to oppose the effects of
serotonin to block the release of NTs that cause emesis
– Acts in lateral hypothalamus to increase appetite
13
• FDA-Approved Indications:
– CINV refractory to first-line antiemetics
– Appetite stimulant for AIDS/cancer-
related anorexia
14. Marinol® (Dronabinol, THC) Review*
• Dose:
– CINV: 5mg/m2 PO 1-3h prior to chemo, then every 2-4h after.
– AIDS/cancer anorexia: 2.5mg PO before lunch and dinner
• Contraindications, Warnings and Precautions:
– CI: allergy to sesame oil
– History of addiction or drug abuse, mental illness*
• Adverse Drug Reactions:
– Psychoactive effects (24% for CINV), dizziness/drowsiness,
hallucinations, anxiety, altered mental state
• Major DDI’s:
– Ethanol (↑absorption, ↑ADR’s), amphetamines (↑BP, ↑HR)
15. The Institute of Medicine Report (1999)
• The Clinton Administration tasked the IOM with
investigating alleged “gateway effects” of cannabis
– Published a 170 page report – Marijuana and Medicine
– “Gateway effect” greatly questioned (tobacco/alcohol)
– Cannabis treats chronic pain and physical symptoms
with a different MOA in the brain than current drugs
– A lack of concrete recommendations and conclusions,
but many statements calling for additional research*
• 15 out of 18 total recommendations!
– “The acute side effects of marijuana use are within the
risks tolerated for many medications” 15
16. Clinical Trial Evidence
• “Cannabis in painful HIV-associated sensory
neuropathy” – Abrams et al. (2007)
• Prospective, randomized placebo-controlled trial
– Adults with HIV and an average baseline daily pain score
of 50mm on the 100mm visual analog scale (VAS)
• 223 screened, 55 randomized, 50 completed (25/25)
– Primary outcome: >30% reduction in VAS pain intensity
– Patients were randomly assigned to smoke 3.56% THC
cannabis cigarettes or placebo cigarettes lacking
alkaloids TID x 5 days
16
17. Clinical Trial Evidence
• Results:
– 50 patients completed the trial
– >30% reduction in pain variables reported by 53% in the
cannabis group vs. 24% in the placebo group (p=0.04)
– Median reduction of pain on the VAS was 34%,
compared to 17% in placebo group (p=0.03)
– Median 72% pain reduction with the first cannabis
cigarette vs. 15% with placebo (p<0.001)
– No serious adverse events were reported
• Mild: Anxiety, sedation, disorientation, confusion, dizziness
• No patients left the study due to adverse effects
17
18. 18Abrams DI, Jay CA, Shade SB, Vizoso H, Reda H, Press S, Kelly ME, Rowbotham MC, Petersen KL. Cannabis in painful HIV-associated sensory neuropathy:
A randomized placebo-controlled trial. Neurology (2007)68:515-521.
19. Clinical Trial Evidence
• “Low-Dose Vaporized Cannabis Significantly
Improves Neuropathic Pain” – Wilsey et al. (2013)
– Double-blinded, placebo-controlled, crossover RCT
• 382 assessed for eligibility, 59 screened, 39 randomized
– Vaporized cannabis (3.53%/1.29% THC) vs. placebo
– Vapor collected in a vaporizer bag with a specially-
designed mouthpiece that allowed repeated, willful
inhalation interruption without loss of vaporized
cannabis
– Primary outcome: 30% decrease in VAS-assessed pain
19
20. Clinical Trial Evidence
• Patients received either low or medium dose or
placebo cannabis at 3 total visits, served as own control
• Dosing was standardized* as much as possible with the
“Foltin Puff Procedure”
• Results:
– 10/38 (26%) of placebo group had VAS reduction of 30%
– 21/37 (57%) of LOW dose group had 30% VAS reduction
• P value = 0.0069; NNT = 3.2
– 22/36 (61%) of MEDIUM dose group had 30% VAS reduction
• P value = 0.0023; NNT = 2.9
– No significant difference between medium and low dose
20
22. Clinical Trial Evidence
• “Smoked cannabis for spasticity in multiple
sclerosis” – Corey-Bloom et al. (2012)
– Randomized, placebo-controlled crossover trial
• 196 screened, 37 randomized, 30 completed trial
• Patients could be cannabis-naïve or experienced
– Primary outcome: change in spasticity on the modified
Ashworth scale (a sum of 6 individual joint scores)
• 0 = no increase in muscle tone
• 1 = slight increase (catch and release during motion)
• 2 = slight increase (catch and minimal resistance)
• 3 = more marked increase during motion
• 4 = considerable increase in tone; passive movement difficult
• 5 = rigid flexion and extension
22
23. Clinical Trial Evidence
• Participants smoked either a placebo or a cannabis
cigarette, using the Foltin Puff Procedure
– 3 visits per treatment phase
• Phase 1 was followed by 11-day washout, then
patients crossed over to opposite group for phase 2
• Results:
– Cannabis use decreased spasticity an additional 2.74
points vs. placebo on the modified Ashworth scale
– Cannabis reduced VAS scores by 5.28 points
– 7 dropouts did not affect results in sensitivity analysis*
23
24. Clinical Trial Evidence
24Adapted from Corey-Bloom J, Wolfson T, Gamst A, Jin S, Marcotte T, Bentley H, Gouaux B. Smoked cannabis for spasticity in multiple sclerosis: a
randomized, placebo-controlled trial. CMAJ (2012);184(10):1143-50.
25. 25Corey-Bloom J, Wolfson T, Gamst A, Jin S, Marcotte T, Bentley H, Gouaux B. Smoked cannabis for spasticity in multiple sclerosis: a randomized, placebo-
controlled trial. CMAJ (2012);184(10):1143-50.
26. Study Limitations
• Small sample sizes in all studies
– Restrictive nature of Schedule I research
• Difficult to blind the subjects
– Not difficult for patients to realize they ingested THC…
• Most studies haven’t included patients who were
cannabis-naïve at onset of trial
– Abrams et al. (2007) and Wilsey et al. (2013) have NIH
authorization to expose naïve patients to cannabis
• Difficult to standardize the cannabinoid doses
– Foltin Puff Procedure used in most clinical trials
26
27. Compassionate Drug Use
• “Compassionate drug use” refers to the treatment of
seriously ill patients using new, unapproved drugs when
no other treatments are available
– Drugs being tested but not yet approved are investigational
drugs and generally only available to clinical trial participants
• “Expanded access programs” (EAP)
– A company sponsoring a drug in late stage clinical trials can
offer an EAP for patients who can’t enroll in a trial
• “Single patient access programs”
– Doctor contacts drug company and inquires about use for
one patient. If the company agrees, the doctor works with
the company to ask the FDA to approve the drug for use 27
28. New York State Bills and Regulations
• New York Assembly Bill A06357
– Introduced 3/26/2013, passed 6/19/2014
– Introduced by Assembly member Richard Gottfried (D)
– Passed Senate on 6/20/2014
– Signed into law by Gov. Andrew Cuomo on 7/5/2014
– Regulations drafted 12/18/2014
• Title 10 of Official Compilation of Codes, Rules and
Regulations of the State of New York was amended
to include §80-1: Medical Use of Marihuana
28
29. Requirements for Prescribers
• Must have a medical license in good standing in NYS
• Must complete a NYSDOH-approved 4 hour course
– This course WILL NOT count for CE credit
– Course must include pharmacology, CI’s, W/P’s, ADR’s,
OD/abuse prevention, DDI’s, dosing, and the approved
products and their routes of administration
– Course would be somewhat similar to a buprenorphine
prescribing course to treat opioid dependence
• Eligible Prescribers may issue Certifications to
eligible Patients and/or Caregivers
– Must include a statement saying other treatment
options have not provided adequate relief to the Patient
30. Requirements for Prescribers
• Prescribers must be qualified to treat ≥1 of the following
chronic health conditions:
1. Cancer
2. HIV/AIDS
3. Epilepsy
4. Neuropathies
5. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS)
6. Huntington’s disease
7. Parkinson’s disease
8. Multiple sclerosis (MS)
9. Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)
10. Damage to spinal cord nervous tissue with intractable spasticity
• The Commissioner may add or remove approved conditions
and must decide by January 2016 to add PTSD, muscular
dystrophy, Alzheimer’s, dystonia, and rheumatoid arthritis
31. Disease-Accompanying Symptoms
• One or more of the conditions must include:
1. Severe or chronic pain causing a substantial limitation
of function
31
2. Severe nausea
3. Seizures
4. Cachexia or wasting
syndrome
5. Severe or persistent
muscle spasms
• The Commissioner may add or remove disease-
accompanying symptoms
32. Prescribing or Recommending?
• Prescribers can’t prescribe medicinal cannabis on
an Official New York State Prescription Blank, but
they can “recommend” it on separate forms
• On the recommendation form must be written:
– Patient-specific information (like a regular prescription)
– Authorized cannabis brand and formulation
– Dosing information for patient’ proper use
– Any limitations to the use of the approved product
– The total amount of product that can be dispensed
• Quantity can NEVER exceed a 30 day supply!
• Prescriber must retain records for 5 years 32
33. 33
Grant I, Atkinson JH, Gouaux B, Wilsey B. Medical Marijuana: Clearing Away the Smoke. The Open Neurology Journal (2012);6:18-25.
34. Requirements for Patients or Caregivers
• Prescriber-issued Certifications expire in ONE year
– Terminally ill certifications last until death or revocation
• Patients or Caregivers must register with NYSDOH
to be added in registry and pay annual fee of $50*
• Dependent Patients may appoint TWO Caregivers
– Each approved Caregiver can have FIVE Patients
– Persons under 18 require approved Caregivers ≥21
• Patient may not vaporize Products in public places
or any place that has banned smoking cigarettes
• Purchasing party must pay cash to buy products34
36. Requirements for Manufacturer Applications
• Each Applicant must pay fees to submit Application
– Application fee is a nonrefundable $10,000
– Registration fee is a refundable $200,000, if approved
• Each Manufacturer must submit:
– Standard operating procedures (SOPs)
– Disposal, security and control procedures
– Product details
– Architecture plans
– Quality assurance plans
– Lab test protocols
36
37. Requirements for Manufacturer Applications
• Must renew Certification every 2 years (same fees)
– Renewal must be received no less than FOUR months
before Manufacturer Certification expiration
– Applicant must include all complaints received, SOPs
changes, lab test reports and theft/loss reports
– Applicant must include quality assurance summary for
all Products tested in prior year, and shortage dates
• The Commissioner can reject or void Certifications,
Applications (including renewals) at any time and
without advance notice if NYSDOH believes that
medicinal cannabis endangers public health! 37
38. Requirements for Manufacturers
• FIVE Manufacturers will be established in New York
– NYSDOH expects over 100 Applications
• Each Manufacturer can produce up to FIVE Products
– Samples of which must be retained for future testing
– Must have at least one cannabis Product that is high in
CBD and low in THC (think “Charlotte’s Web”)
– Must have at least one cannabis Product that has an
approximately 1:1 ratio of THC and CBD.
• A Manufacturer may have up to FOUR contracted
Dispensaries, setting a maximum of 20 in the State
38
39. Requirements for Manufacturers
• Manufacturer must be able to ensure the
availability of a ONE YEAR supply of all Products
• All records must be readily available for inspection
• Manufacturers can ONLY hire union workers ≥21!
• Manufacturers must recertify every 2 YEARS!
• Manufacturer may work with
banks to manage taxes and
money accounts*
– In Colorado, suitcases or strong-
box safes stuffed with cash are
delivered to government offices
40. Some Difficulties With Banking
• Financial institutions disallow payment for illegal drugs
– Federal Law states the businesses cannot deposit their
cannabis revenues at their banks (money laundering?)
• 2009 – Deputy AG David Ogden stated companies in
states with legal cannabis won’t be prosecuted
– 2011 – Deputy AG James M. Cole stated this memo wasn’t
intended to shield cannabis companies from the Feds
• 2014 – AG Eric Holder stated banks could work with
cannabis industries and won’t be prosecuted
– Financial Crimes Enforcement Network: banks may choose
– Must still file Federal “suspicious activity reports”
40
41. Approved Medicinal Cannabis Products
• Each brand must have a total THC and CBD
concentration within 5% of labeled value (mg/dose)
• Brand names must be alphanumeric combinations
• Maximum of 10mg THC per dose!
• Approved dosage forms:
– Extract in oil for SL administration
– Extract for vaporization (metered and uniform doses)
– Extract in a capsule for ingestion
– Edible food product only by Commissioner approval
41
43. Approved Medicinal Cannabis Products
• Product label must include ALL these alkaloids:
– Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)
– Tetrahydrocannabinol acid (THCA)
– Tetrahydrocannabivarin (THCV)
– Cannabidiol (CBD)
– Cannabinadiolic acid (CBDA)
– Cannabidivarine (CBDV)
– Cannabinol (CBN)
– Cannabigerol (CBG)
– Cannabichromene (CBC)
– Any other cannabinoid component at >0.1%
43
44. Auxiliary Labels
• “Medical marihuana products must be kept in the original
container in which they were dispensed and removed from the
original container only when ready for use by the certified
patient”;
• “Keep secured at all times”;
• “May not be resold or transferred to another person”;
• “This product might impair the ability to drive”;
• “KEEP THIS PRODUCT AWAY FROM CHILDREN (unless medical
marihuana product is being given to the child under a
practitioner’s care”); and
• “This product is for medicinal use only. Women should not
consume during pregnancy or while breastfeeding except on the
advice of the certifying practitioner, and in the case of
breastfeeding mothers, including the infant’s pediatrician.”
44
45. Unapproved Medicinal Cannabis Products
• NO RAW PLANT MATERIAL FOR SMOKING!
– NYS is trying to cut down on statewide smoking rates!
• NO RAW PLANT MATERIAL FOR INGESTION!
– Edibles must be premade and prepackaged
• NO FLASHY BRAND NAMES OR ADVERTISEMENTS!
• NO REFERENCES TO 420 CULTURE!
• NO MOLD OR CONTAMINANTS!
• NO ADDITIVES UNLESS PHARMACEUTICAL GRADE!
• NO STATING YOUR PRODUCT IS MOST EFFECTIVE!
45
47. Dispensing Facilities (Dispensaries)
• NYS PHARMACIST MUST BE ON SITE WHEN OPEN!
– Must counsel all Patients, like in a pharmacy
– Medication information sheets must be given
• Dispensaries cannot sell non-cannabis products
without prior NYSDOH approval
• No Product, food or drink may be consumed within
• Patients/caregivers must show certification to enter
– May only fill a 30 DAY SUPPLY at a time, and may NOT
break manufacturer packaging
• Must report all sales to NYSDOH 47
50. Dispensing Facilities (Dispensaries)
• Sufficient security measures must safeguard Staff,
Facilities and Products and must include the following:
– Perimeter alarm
– Motion detectors
– Lighting around the perimeter of the facility
– Video cameras at all entries/exits and at product storage
– 24 hour recording capability (≥90 days of storage space)
– A duress alarm (for forced shut down of security)
– A panic alarm (to alert police of emergency situation)
– A hold-up alarm (to signal police to the robbery)
– Automatic voice dialer, that will send prerecorded message
– Failure notification for security (notification within 5 minutes)
– Backup generator for power outages
– Capability to take clear, color photos with 9600dpi resolution
– Back-up alarm system for non-operational hours
50
51. Other States Involve Pharmacists
• Connecticut (2012)
– Only pharmacists can have dispensary licenses
– Pharmacists must check and send records to the PMP
– Dispensary workers must be registered pharmacy techs
• Minnesota (2014)
– Only pharmacists can dispense cannabis to Patients or
Caregivers and counsel on its proper use
• Rhode Island (2006)
– Legal literature safeguarding RPh licensure (counseling)
• Illinois, Maryland, Minnesota, New Hampshire
– Must have a pharmacist sitting on advisory boards 51
52. Miscellaneous Points
• Under NO circumstances can cannabis products
manufactured in New York be taken out of NYS!
• These proposed regulations would sunset SEVEN
years after the approval date if not reapproved
• Cannabis tax of 7% (paid by Facilities)
• Manufacturers can NOT give free samples
• NY Manufacturers can’t dispense from same facility
– AK, HI, MI, MT, NE, OR & WA don’t allow Dispensaries
• No Product may be delivered without DOH approval
• Only female plants can be used for extraction 52
53. So Can I Get Medicinal Cannabis Now?
• NO! These are just proposed regulations, and
although they are expected to pass with minor
changes, infrastructure is currently unimplemented
• Since the passage of the Compassionate Care Act,
three children have died from treatment-resistant
epilepsy complications
– Acting Commissioner of Health Howard A. Zucker has
petitioned the DEA and DOJ to allow for the interim
importation of high CBD cannabis Products into NYS
– Requests in August and September have been ignored
53
54. Some Dollars and Cents
• Medicinal cannabis programs have mixed success
• Successes:
– Arizona received $7.9 million in taxes and fees from April
2011 – June 2012 (cost the state just $2.4M to run)
– Michigan took in $9.9M in 2012, spending just $3.6M
– Oregon siphoned $900K in 2005, Nevada proposed
siphoning $700,000/year for substance abuse education
• Disappointments and failures-to-launch:
– Rhode Island took in $566,655 in fees but spent
$589,086 in the 2011-2012 fiscal year
– New Jersey approved laws in 2010; in 2013, Greenleaf
Compassion Center was the only operating dispensary
55. Summary of Legal Challenges
• Information vs. misinformation
– Fear-mongering (“gateway drug”)
– Supporters sensationalizing benefits
– Internet shock sites and blogs
– Inherent and persistent biases
– YouTube® and Reddit® “activists”
• Topic is very politically charged
– Federal vs. State
– Democrats vs. Republicans
– Boomers vs. Gen X/Millennials
55
56. Summary of Legal Challenges
• Large-scale trials require approval from the FDA
– The FDA is hesitant to allow studies using Schedule I
controlled substances
– The resulting paucity of data prevents the potential
rescheduling of cannabis into Schedules II-V
• Obtaining product for studies is very prohibitive
– National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) is the ONLY legal
body authorized to cultivate large amounts
– Extension site located at the University of Mississippi
– This single site cannot supply enough product for a
large-scale clinical trial (ex. Phase III) 56
57. Summary of Legal Challenges
• California
– Gonsales vs. Raich landmark trial
– SCOTUS ruled that even with favorable State law, the
Federal Government can criminalize medicinal cannabis
production under the Federal Commerce Clause
• Massachusetts
– As recently as 9/2014, DEA agents have visited MDs to
give an ultimatum: sever ties with medicinal cannabis or
have their DEA licenses permanently revoked
• US Attorney General Eric Holder said the Feds will
be laissez-faire (he’s announced his resignation) 57
58. Food for Thought
• Medicinal cannabis is a legal labyrinth
– Using a Schedule I for medical purposes in the USA
– Once a Schedule I, always a Schedule I?
– Surveillance studies are being done to track changes in
cannabis use, gauge side effects from medical treatment,
and judge effectiveness of State programs
• It has catalyzed renewed interest in medical
research with other classes of Schedule I drugs
– MDMA (“ecstasy”)
– Psychedelics
58
59. Budding Research Areas
• Methylenedioxy-methamphetamine (MDMA)
– Potential PTSD treatment, original research halted in
1985
– Physicians, therapists, researchers opposed the DEA
– Currently being used as unauthorized therapy in USA
• Renewed research in PTSD
– A 2010 treatment-resistant PTSD trial (Mithoefer et al.)
• 20 patients, mean 19 years of TR-PTSD, mean 4.2 drug trials
• 2 introductory sessions, then all day/night MDMA or placebo
session (CAPS 4 days later), repeat, then placebo cross over.
– 2013 long-term follow-up with the same patients
• 17/19 patients had long term decrease in CAPS, no serious ADR
59
60. Mithoefer MC, Wagner MT, Mithoefer AT, Jerome L,Doblin R. The safety and efficacy of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine-assisted psychotherapy in subjects
with chronic, treatment-resistant posttraumatic stress disorder: the first randomized controlled pilot study. Journal of Psychopharmacology (2011);25(4):439-452.
• Clinical response = >30%
reduction in CAPS
• Stage 1 – Clinical response
was 83.3% (10/12) in
MDMA group versus 25%
(2/8) in placebo group
• Stage 2 – 100% clinical
response rate with former
placebo group members
• All 3 PTSD-disabled
subjects returned to work
• F/U: 89% reported
increased wellbeing, 79%
reported less avoidance of
people or places
61. • Average time since last MDMA session = ~3.5 years
• Potential for enduring, clinically meaningful benefit to
MDMA-assisted psychotherapy for TR-PTSD?
• No long-term neurocognitive decline (opposite?)
• No development of substance abuse
Mithoefer MC, Wagner MT, Mithoefer AT, Jerome L, Doblin R. The safety and efficacy of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine-assisted psychotherapy in subjects
with chronic, treatment-resistant posttraumatic stress disorder: the first randomized controlled pilot study. Journal of Psychopharmacology (2011);25(4):439-452.
62. Budding Research Areas
• Psilocybin (Psilocybe sp. mushrooms)
– Treatment of anxiety in terminal illness, PTSD, drug and
tobacco addiction and depression
– The potential use in depression therapy was featured in
a CNN article recently
• Lysergic acid diethylamide/LSD
– Renewed research interest as alcohol and drug abuse
therapy and for anxiety brought on by terminal illness
• Ibogaine (Tabernanthe iboga)
– Anti-addictive properties discovered by NYC heroin circle
– Stimulant; cardiac and CNS effects and long duration62
63. Budding Research Areas
• Mescaline (Peyote & San Pedro cacti)
– Studied in alcohol treatment in Native Americans
– The United States Indian Health Service acknowledges it
as the best treatment for alcoholism in Native Americans
• Dimethyltryptamine/DMT (Ayahuasca)
– Potential for treatment of depression and alcoholism
– Santo Daime and União do Vegetal church members
have lower rates of alcoholism than the general public
• Salvinorin A (Salvia divinorum)
– In animal models, seems to treat opioid addiction
63
64. Schedule I vs. Schedule II Requirements
• Schedule I Controlled Substance
– The drug or other substance has a high potential for abuse
– The drug or other substance has no currently accepted
medical use in treatment in the United States
– There is a lack of accepted safety for use of the drug or other
substance under medical supervision
• Schedule II Controlled Substance
– The drug or other substance has a high potential for abuse
– The drug or other substance has a currently accepted
medical use in treatment in the United States or a currently
accepted medical use with severe restrictions
– Abuse of the drug or other substances may lead to severe
psychological or physical dependence 64
65. Conclusions
• There is a universally acknowledged lack of large
scale, long term medicinal cannabis clinical trials!
• Politics continue to prevent cannabis research
– Reclassification to Schedule II is paramount for more
research to be approved and completed
• New York’s medicinal cannabis regulations, when
approved, will be the strictest in the nation
• Medicinal cannabis paves the way for a renewed
investigation into the medical accuracy and current
application of the Controlled Substances Act (1970)
65
66. Resources
• New York State Department of Health
– www.health.ny.gov/regulations/medical_marijuana/
• The Marijuana Policy Project
– www.mpp.org
• The Multidisciplinary Association for Psychedelic Studies
– www.maps.org
• ProCon
– www.medicalmarijuana.procon.org
• Dave Porter, Pharm.D candidate
– David.Porter@acphs.edu
66
67. 1. Abrams DI, Jay CA, Shade SB, Vizoso H, Reda H, Press S, Kelly ME, Rowbotham MC, Petersen KL. Cannabis in painful HIV-associated sensory
neuropathy: A randomized placebo-controlled trial. Neurology (2007)68:515-521.
2. Ahmet Ulugöl. The Endocannabinoid System as a Potential Therapeutic Target for Pain Modulation. Balkan Med J (2014);31:115-20.
3. Alan Zarembo. Exploring therapeutic effects of MDMA on post-traumatic stress. LA Times: Mar 15, 2014. Available from: <
http://articles.latimes.com/2014/mar/15/local/la-me-mdma-20140316>.
4. Basch E, Prestrud AA, Hesketh PJ, et al. Antiemetics: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol
2011;29(31):4189-98.
5. Baumeister D, Barnes G, Giaroli G, Tracy D. Classical hallucinogens as antidepressants? A review of pharmacodynamics and putative clinical
roles. Ther Adv Psychopharmacol (2014);4(4):156-69.
6. Carhart-Harris RL, Leech R, Williams TM, Erritzoe D, Abbasi N, Bargiotas T, et al. Implications for psychedelic-assisted psychotherapy:
functional magnetic resoinance imaging study with psilocybin. British Journal of Psychiatry (2012);200:238-44.
7. Clark PA, Capuzzi K, Fick C. Medical marijuana: Medical necessity versus political agenda. Med Sci Monit (2011);17(12):249-261.
8. Compassionate Care New York. Frequently Asked Questions about New York’s Medical Marijuana Bill. (2014). Compassionate Care New York.
Available from <www.compassionatecareny.org>.
9. Corey-Bloom J, Wolfson T, Gamst A, Jin S, Marcotte T, Bentley H, Gouaux B. Smoked cannabis for spasticity in multiple sclerosis: a
randomized, placebo-controlled trial. CMAJ (2012);184(10):1143-50.
10. Dronabinol, THC. In: Clinical Pharmacology [database on the Internet]. Tampa (FL): Gold Standard; 2008 [updated 6Jan 2014; cited 26 Jan
2015]. Available from: www.clinicalpharmacology.com. Subscription required to view.
11. Dronabinol. In: Lexi-drugs online [database on the Internet]. Hudson (OH): Lexicomp, Inc.; 2013 [updated 15 Jan 2015; cited 27 Jan 2015].
Available from: http://online.lexi.com. Subscription required to view.
12. Ellis RJ, Toperoff W, Vaida F, van den Brande G, Gonzales J, Gouaux B, Bentley H, Atkinson JH. Smoked Medicinal Cannabis for Neuropathic
Pain in HIV: A Randomized, Crossover Clinical Trial. Neuropsychopharmacology (2009);34(3):672-80.
13. Ethan B Russo. Cannabinoids in the management of difficult to treat pain. Ther Clin Risk Manag (2008);4(1):245–59.
14. Food and Drug Administration. Controlled Substances Act. Updated Jun 2009. Available from:
<http://www.fda.gov/regulatoryinformation/legislation/ucm148726.htm#cntlsbb>.
15. Garcia-Romeu A, Griffiths RR, Johnson MW. Psilocybin-Occasioned Mystical Experiences in the Treatment of Tobacco Addiction. Current Drug
Abuse Reviews (2014);7(2):e-pub ahead of print.
16. Gasser P, Holstein D, Michel Y, Roblin R, Yazar-Klosinski B, Passie T, et al. Safety and Efficacy of Lysergic Acid Diethylamide-Assisted
Psychotherapy for Anxiety Associated with Life-threatening Diseases. J Nerv Ment Dis (2014):4(202):513-20. 67
References
68. 17. Gasser P, Holstein D, Michel Y, Roblin R, Yazar-Klosinski B, Passie T, et al. Safety and Efficacy of Lysergic Acid Diethylamide-Assisted
Psychotherapy for Anxiety Associated with Life-threatening Diseases. J Nerv Ment Dis (2014):4(202):513-20.
18. Gerald J McKenna. The Current Status of Medical Marijuana in the United States. Hawai’I J of Med & Pub Health (2014);73(4):105-8.
19. Grob CS, Danforth AL, Chopra GS, Hagerty M, McKay CR, Halberstadt et al. Pilot Study of Psilocybin Treatment for Anxiety in Patients With
Advanced-Stage Cancer. Arch Gen Psychiatry (2011);68(1):71-78.
20. Grotenhermen F, Müller-Vahl K. The Therapeutic Potential of Cannabis and Cannabinoids. Deutsches Ärzteblatt International (2012);109(29–
30):495–501.
21. Gonzalez R, Martin EM, Grant I, Neuropsychology and Substance Use, Taylor & Francis Group. (2007) Marijuana (Chapter 5, 139-170).
22. Grant I, Atkinson JH, Gouaux B, Wilsey B. Medical Marijuana: Clearing Away the Smoke. The Open Neurology Journal (2012);6:18-25.
23. Grant I, Atkinson JH, Mattison A, Coates TJ. Report to the Legislature and Governor of the State of California presenting findings pursuant to
SB847 which created the CMCR and provided state funding. Center for Medicinal Cannabis Research. 2010 Feb 11. Available from:
<www.cmcr.ucsd.edu>.
24. Griffiths RR, Johnson MW, Richards WA, Richards BD, McCann U, Jesse R. Psilocybin occasioned mystical-type experiences: Immediate and
persisting dose-related effects. Psychopharmacology (Berl) (2011);218(4):649-65.
25. Jennifer Donnelly. The Need for Ibogaine in Drug and Alcohol Addiction Treatment. Journal of Legal Medicine (2011);32:93-114.
26. Johnson MW, Garcia-Romeu A, Cosimano MP, Griffiths RR. Pilot study of the 5-HT2aR agonist psilocybin in the treatment of tobacco
addiction. Journal of Psychopharmacology (2014);28(11):983-92.
27. Johnson MW, Richards WA, Griffiths RR. Human hallucinogen research: guidelines for safety. Journal of Psychopharmacology
(2008);22(6):608-20.
28. Joseph Gregorio. Physicians, Medical Marijuana, and the Law. AMA J of Ethics (2014):16(9):732-738.
29. Kahan M, Srivastava A, Spithoff S, Bromley L. Prescribing smoked cannabis for chronic noncancer pain: Preliminary recommendations.
Canadian Family Physician (2014);60:1083-90.
30. Kraehenmann R, Preller KH, Scheidegger M, Pokorny T, Bosch OG, Seifritz E, et al. Psilocybin-induced Decrease in Amygdala Reactivity
Correlates with Enhanced Positive Mood in Healthy Volunteers. Biol Psychiatry (2014);e-pub.
31. Krebs TS and Johansen PO. Lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) for alcoholism: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of
Psychopharmacology (2012):26(3):996-1002.
32. Krebs TS and Johansen PO. Psychedelics and Mental Health: a Population Study. PLoS ONE (2013);8(8):e63972.
33. Lynch ME, Campbell F. Cannabinoids for treatment of chronic non-cancer pain; a systematic review of randomized trials. Br J Clin Pharmacol
(2011);72(5):735-44. 68
References
69. References
34. Mačiulaitis R, Kontrimavičiūtė V, Bressolle FMM, Briedis V. Ibogaine, an anti-addictive drug: pharmacology and time to go further in
development. A narrative review. Human and Experimental Toxicology (2008);27:181-194.
35. Michael Winkelman. Psychedelics as Medicines for Substance Abuse Rehabilitation: Evaluating Treatments with LSD, Peyote, Ibogaine and
Ayahuasca. Current Drug Abuse Reviews (2014);7:101-16.
36. Mithoefer MC, Wagner MT, Mithoefer AT, Jerome L, Doblin R. The safety and efficacy of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine-assisted
psychotherapy in subjects with chronic, treatment-resistant posttraumatic stress disorder: the first randomized controlled pilot study. Journal
of Psychopharmacology (2011);25(4):439-452.
37. Mithoefer MC, Wagner MT, Mithoefer AT, Jerome L, Martin SF, Yazar-Klosinski, et al. Durability of improvement in post-traumatic stress
disorder symptoms and absence of harmful effects or drug dependency after 3,4-methylenedioxy-methamphetamine-assisted
psychotherapy:a prospective long-term follow-up study. Journal of Psychopharmacology (2013);27(1):28-39.
38. Muni Rubens. Political and Medical Views of Medical Marijuana and its Future. Social Work in Public Health (2014);29:121-31.
39. Nabilone. In: Clinical Pharmacology [database on the Internet]. Tampa (FL): Gold Standard; 2008 [updated 21 Jul 2014; cited 26 Jan 2015].
Available from: www.clinicalpharmacology.com. Subscription required to view.
40. Nabilone. In: Lexi-drugs online [database on the Internet]. Hudson (OH): Lexicomp, Inc.; 2013 [updated 20 Nov 2014; cited 27 Jan 2015].
Available from: http://online.lexi.com. Subscription required to view.
41. New York State Assembly Bill 6357. 2013 Mar 26. Available from <http://assembly.state.ny.us/leg/?sh=printbill&bn=A06357&term=2013>.
42. New York State Department of Health. New York State Medical Marijuana Program. Dec 2014. Available from:
<http://www.health.ny.gov/regulations/medical_marijuana/>.
43. ProCon. Medical Marijuana Pros and Cons. Last updated 11/13/2014. Available from: <http://medicalmarijuana.procon.org/>.
44. Schenberg EE,de Castro Comis MA, Rassmussen Chaves B, da Silveira DX. Treating drug dependence with the aid of ibogaine: A retrospective
study. Journal of Psychopharmacology (2014);28(11):993-1000.
45. Tylš F, Páleníček T, Horáčeka J. Psilocybin – Summary of knowledge and new perspectives. European Neuropsychopharmacology
(2014);24:342-56.
46. Wallace M, Schulteis G, Atkinson JH, Wolfson T, Lazzaretto D, Bentley H, et al. Dose-dependent Effects of Smoked Cannabis on Capsaicin-
induced Pain and Hyperalgesia in Healthy Volunteers. Anesthesiology (2007);107(5):785-96.
47. Wilsey B, Marcotte T, Deutsch R, Gouaux B, Sakai S, Donaghe H. (2013). Low-Dose Vaporized Cannabis Significantly Improves Neuropathic
Pain. J Pain, 14(2):136-48.
48. Wilsey B, Marcotte T, Tsodikov A, Millman J, Bentley H, Gouaux B, Fishman S. (2008) A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Crossover Trial of
Cannabis Cigarettes in Neuropathic Pain. J Pain, 9(6):506-21.
69
Legal disclaimer: any opinions or positions given herein do not necessarily reflect those of the Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences or MVP Health Care or their respective Associates, and reflect those only of Dave Porter, Pharm.D candidate
A new species was said to have been found in 2014 in Australia, but it was a hoax (High Times Magazine)
800-900AD – Ibn Wahshiyah made this claim
Cannabis sativa as illustrated in Köhler's book of medicinal plants from 1897
Cannabis has a long history of medicinal use in the USA, and it was at one point approved by USP!
NY became the 23rd state to approve legislature to legalize medicinal cannabis – California was the first (1996)
1937 - The American Medical Association (AMA) opposed the act because the tax was imposed on physicians prescribing cannabis, retail pharmacists selling cannabis, and medical cannabis cultivation/manufacturing
William Randolph Hearst was influential in the passage of his act (hemp was poised to provide competition to paper made from tree pulp, and he and the du Pont family had large timber assets and interests)
Dravet Syndrome is also called Severe Myoclonic Epilepsy of Infancy (SMEI)
Parents even contacted a European pharmaceutical company testing a canine antiseizure medication
The first seizures with Dravet Syndrome usually start before the age of 1
In the second year, myoclonic seizures, muscle spasms, and status epilepticus (seizures that last more than 30 minutes or come in clusters)
Charlotte was unable to independently do most activities of daily living, such as eating, drinking and walking.
Seizures were affecting her cognitive development
She was DNR
In Colorado: The average patient in the program is 42 years old. There are 39 patients under the age of 18.
Low THC, high CBD cannabis was rare in CO because it can’t really be used recreationally
The strain the Stanleys used was called “Hippie’s Disappointment”
Realm of Caring Foundation was founded to provide Charlotte’s Web access to parents with children with debilitating conditions
Have satellite offices in CA and FL (FL is strictly advocative since FL has no laws in place)
Receiving 1 dose of 3-4mg/lb of oil twice a day with food
After treatment, her seizures usually only happen at night when she is sleeping
* - MANY STEPS FOR PARENTS TO GET CHARLOTTE’S WEB:
Establish an account through the Patient Portal on the website
Fill out Realm of Caring Confidentiality Agreement
Get on the Colorado waitlist
Establish residency
Get doctors to sign red card application
Send in Medical Cannabis Registry Card application (also known as red card) to the Colorado Medical Marijuana Registry.
Send Realm of Caring copies of application, certified mail receipt and return receipt via Patient Portal
View the orientation video
View the dosing calculation video
Wait for notification from Realm of Caring that meds are ready
Pick up medication at Indispensary
* - “Some aspect” is usually some type of high CBD, low THC cannabis preparation like Charlotte’s Web
The estimates of CA and WA are based off of the per capita registration in OR.
Estimate of ME is based off of per capita registration in Vermont.
Mainly democratic leaning states (drug law relaxation is more of a Democrat platform than a Republican one)
Some states did not give information to ProCon about the per capita use of medicinal cannabis
State regulations differ relatively dramatically
Arizona caps the amount of dispensaries as 10% of total # of pharmacies would be about 125 (NY max of 20)
Most allow smoking as means of drug delivery (not NY and MN)
Many allow patients to own and grow their own plants (not NY)
MI, WA and others have ruled dispensaries are illegal – takes Pharm.D out of the equation!
Patients have to get it directly from the manufacturer or grow it themselves (variable dosing with growing it!)
Some states will allow other states’ ID cards for possession, but not purchase or growing within the state (not NY)
This was a CII but now it’s a CIII (1999)
Cannabinoid receptors are localized in neuroanatomical regions intimately involved with transmission and modulation of pain signals; the periaqueductal gray (PAG), the rostral ventromedial medulla (RVM), and the dorsal horn of the spinal cord.
Lots of CB receptors in the basal ganglia (effected in Parkinson’s and Huntington’s diseases
There are more CB receptors in the brain than mu opioid receptors (10:1 ratio)
THC is converted by the liver into a more potent active metabolite
This is THC, not CBD
Max dose = 15mg/m2/dose
Mental illness = schizophrenia, psychosis, depression, bipolar disorder
There were 15 instances of “we recommend clinical trials”
Only one study was completed after 1981… so this report definitely leaves a lot to be desired! Most studies were said to be too small to be able to generalize data to the public as a whole, and this is why the IOM recommended larger studies be done!
“A cannabinoid, or other analgesic, could potentially be useful under any of the following circumstances:
There is a medical condition for which it is more effective than any currently available medication.
It has a broad clinical spectrum of efficacy and a unique side effect profile.
It has synergistic interactions with other analgesics.
It exhibits "side effects" that are considered useful in some clinical situations.
Its efficacy is enhanced in patients who have developed tolerance to opioids.” CANCER PAIN = BEST EVIDENCE IN REPORT
Can’t be blinded – patients will know that they are smoking THC-containing cannabis!
Primary outcome measures included ratings of chronic pain and the percentage achieving 30% reduction in pain intensity
Alkaloids in the placebo cigarettes had been extracted by the lab at National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
Inclusions: Adults with at least 30mm on the VAS; stable health; no current substance abuse (including tobacco; stable medication regimen for pain and HIV for at least 8 weeks prior to enrollment (using conventional meds); prior cannabis use (6x/lifetime) but no additional cannabis was not allowed during any study phases
Exclusions: non HIV neuropathy; received isoniazid, dapsone or metronidazole 8 weeks prior to study; currently not on HAART
Remember – cannabis is only being used for symptom control.
There is no treatment to “cure” neuropathic pain at its source!
Sedation was most noteworthy side effect
7-day outpatient pre-intervention phase: researchers established patient eligibility;
2-day inpatient lead-in phase: patients acclimated to the inpatient General Clinical Research Center and obtained baseline measurements;
5-day inpatient intervention phase: patients received either 3.56% THC cannabis cigarettes or placebo cannabis with alkaloids extracted;
7-day outpatient post-intervention phase: patients continued to record pain ratings each day
Vaporization avoids respiratory toxins by heating cannabis below combustion point, so just active cannabinoid vapors form
Inclusions: neuropathy, previous cannabis use (not within 30 days), stable conventional treatments for neuropathy
Exclusions: severe depression; suicidal ideation; uncontrolled HTN; CV disease; asthma/COPD; active substance abuse
* - Verbally signaled to “hold the vaporizer bag with one hand and put the vaporizer mouthpiece in their mouth” (30 seconds), “Get ready” (5 sec), “inhale” (5 sec), “hold vapor in lungs” (10 sec) “exhale and wait” before repeating puff cycle (40 sec)
Subjects inhaled four puffs at 60 minutes. At 180 minutes, the balloon (functioning somewhat like a spacer for inhalers) was refilled and deploying the flexible dose design described previously, subjects inhaled four to eight puffs.
NNT’s are in the range of two commonly deployed anticonvulsants used to treat neuropathic pain
pregabalin, NNT = 3.9, gabapentin, NNT = 3.8
Both hips, both elbows, both knees max of 30 points on Ashworth
Ashworth measured 45 minutes after treatment
Patients could be on stable disease modifying therapy (interferon beta +/- glatiramer) if longer than 6 months prior
Inclusions: At least 3 Ashworth points at an elbow, hip or knee; no cannabis use within 30 days
Exclusions: Major psychiatric disorder other than depression; ANY substance abuse; asthma/COPD; recent medication changes; use of benzodiazepines; severe neurological condition other than MS (epilepsy, head trauma)
* - Worst-case scenario sensitivity analysis (assuming that the seven patients who withdrew would not have shown any treatment effect):
Cannabis reduced average scores on the modified Ashworth scale by 2.22 points (p < 0.001)
Cannabis reduced the VAS of pain by 4.28 points (p = 0.009)
These findings suggest that dropouts had no meaningful effect on the results
Effect = (change in cannabis – change in placebo)
Positive values mean decreases (so cannabis decreased or slowed all of these things)
Higher scores of spasticity = more spasticity
Insignificant decrease in spasticity in placebo
Significant decrease in cannabis smoking group
Cannabis use decreased spasticity an additional 2.74 points vs. placebo on the modified Ashworth scale
Cannabis reduced VAS scores by 5.28 points
Small sample size unavoidable due to DEA restrictions on access
Blinding psychoactives is almost impossible
Hard to standardize doses
mg or mg/kg is very hard to standardize for smoked products, because people smoke differently
No high quality trials of cannabis edibles have been completed (would be much easier to standardize doses)
Expanded Access Program – FDA will approve if the drug has shown some type of efficacy
Single Patient Access – MD will submit paperwork to FDA saying why the patient needs the medication.
As little as 24 hour turnaround in emergencies
Recalled twice by Assembly, final form passed 6/19/2014
Regulations have not been approved yet!
Medicinal cannabis will NEVER be first-line therapy – it will be an adjunct to treatment resistant patients
Patient must have a bona fide relationship with their physician
in some states, this usually means over 1 year of regular visits and follow-up
In others, it may require 4+ visits to doctor
Patients may purchase a new supply of medicinal cannabis up to 7 days prior to the 30 day mark on the prior supply
This is just a proposed flow chart for neuropathic pain, but it would work with any other approved condition!
Patient must be on standard Rx treatment while on medicinal cannabis, but may be titrated off it at the discretion of the Prescriber
The fee may be waived for low-income patients if they provide proof of burden
Credit card companies will not allow patients to purchase medicinal cannabis with their cards!
Medicinal cannabis use will be considered a disability for the purposes of NY’s anti-discrimination laws
Employers will not be allowed to fire employees for using medicinal cannabis
NYS may issue cards for patients (adult vs. minor), caregivers, Manufacturer employees and Dispensary employees similar to these in NJ
Other states have cards specific for home-growers, specifying how much plant material (mature or immature) they can have
These fees are relatively low, to encourage businesses to apply
Start-up costs will be approximately $20,000,000 per manufacturer, claim industry analysts.
Manufacturer applications will not get much consideration unless the firm has over $2,000,000 in assets (land and capital)
The demand for these few dispensaries will likely overpower the supply, and waitlists will be long
In comparison, Arizona (population of 6.7 million) has over 100 dispensaries!
A busy cannabis dispensary in Denver can handle about $25,000 a day in cash
"It's crazy, we have secured rooms, and within those secured rooms we have secured locking safes and sometimes within those safes we have money safes" – Brian Ruden, Colorado dispensary owner
An American Express spokesperson has stated “American Express does not allow card acceptance for medical marijuana”
Contradictory statements and a lot of reluctant banks makes for difficulties for cannabis companies
An acceptable name would be something like “DP-27”
An unacceptable name would be something like “Charlotte’s Web” or “DP-420”
The CBD oil and Colorado Cannabis Co. oil would NOT be allowed in NYS per proposed guidelines in their current packaging
They would need to have to be renamed with alphanumeric combinations, and all graphics must be removed if they are stylized in any way.
Packaging must be plain and discrete.
New York State will set ALL prices – only State with the capability to do this
Product labels must include:
(1) the name, address and registration number of the registered organization;
(2) the medical marihuana product form and brand designation;
(3) the single dose THC and CBD content for the product set forth in milligrams (mg);
(4) the medical marihuana product lot unique identifier (lot number or bar code);
(5) the quantity included in the package;
(6) the date packaged;
(7) the date of expiration of the product;
(8) the proper storage conditions;
(9) auxiliary labels
Keep in original container, keep secured, don’t resell or transfer, might impair driving, keep away from children, medicinal use only, pregnancy/breastfeeding warning (contact MD)
Names must be letters and numbers, and cant relate at all to cannabis culture!
Cant be smoked by patients – IOM study found that cannabis cigarettes, because they are unfiltered and because users inhale deeper and hold the smoke longer, deposits up to 4x as much tar as regular cigarettes.
Increased risk of respiratory infections, especially in immunocompromised patients
Pharmacists licenses prohibit them from dispensing the drug, because it’s a Schedule I!
THE 7 DAY RULE FOR NYS CONTROLS DOES NOT APPLY! Patients can pick up supplies 7 days early each month!
Cant sell any retail store items, paraphernalia or other items unless your get approved by DOH
Look how plain and boring it must be
No signage, no neon
New York has a population of 19.5 million and will have a maximum of 20 dispensaries, which will be the lowest per-capita dispensary:population ratio of any medical cannabis state in the USA
This would be ok in NY as long as you cant see the display cases from the outside
Advertising must be minimal and discrete, but décor can be similar to this, if desired
Multiple layers of security and alarms to safeguard Staff, Facilities and Products.
Why so few? Pharmacists should be at the point of dispensing in ALL states!
Rhode Island added a clause in their regulations to allow pharmacists to counsel on correct use without discipline for counseling on how to use a federally illegal substance!
This is not present in NY legislature (yet)
“A practitioner, nurse, or pharmacist shall not be subject to arrest, prosecution or penalty in any manner, or denied any right or privilege, including, but not limited to, civil penalty or disciplinary action by a business or occupational or professional licensing board or bureau solely for discussing the benefits or health risks of medical marijuana or its interaction with other substances with a patient.” (Rules and Regulations Related to the Medical Marijuana Program, RI, updated 2012)
In California, the annual tax revenue from dispensaries is up to $105 million
Excise tax of 7% in New York will be levied on gross receipts and paid by the Manufacturers and Dispensaries
22.5% goes to county were the medical cannabis was produced
22.5% goes to county were the medical cannabis was dispensed
5% goes to Office of Alcohol and Substance Abuse Services for prevention, counseling and treatment services
5% goes to the Department Criminal Justice Services for discretionary grant program related to enforcement of the this title
Remainder goes to New York State’s medical cannabis trust fund
The Products imported would have to adhere to NY standards set in the 2014 proposed regulations
CBD-rich butane hash oil (BHO) is legal in all 50 states because it is considered a food product, but that is largely unregulated, so it would be much safer to import Products manufactured under stricter guidelines!
Michigan surplus was $6.3M and Arizona surplus was $5.5M
Most states operate at a surplus.
The beginning years will generally be in the red due to implementation costs/infrastructure delays (NJ)
Slang terms tying medicinal cannabis to street cannabis (especially in media reports or by politicians or other high-ranking officials) only lessens the professional credibility of the medicinal cannabis movement.
So does users posting videos of themselves smoking cannabis on social media sites like YouTube®
So does sensationalizing the benefits and claiming cannabis is a cure-all miracle drug with no adverse effects
So does the lay public acting like they are experts in the field
Cannabis is a catch-22 - restricted in large part because there is little research to support medical uses, but research is difficult to conduct because of tight restrictions!
Gonsales vs. Raich
Two patients and their caretakers from California sued the federal government claiming that by enforcing the CSA, DEA agents violated the Federal Commerce Clause, medical necessity doctrine and Due Process Clause of the Fifth, Ninth, and Tenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States
A footnote in the Gonsales vs. Raich judgment acknowledged the potential benefits of medicinal cannabis, stating:
“We acknowledge that evidence proffered by respondents in this case regarding the effective medical uses for marijuana, if found credible after trial, would cast serious doubt on the accuracy of the findings that require marijuana to be listed in Schedule I.”
In 2010, Oregon rescheduled cannabis to Schedule II, becoming the first State to do so.
The precedent has been set
MDMA is synthetic, developed by Merck & Co., Inc. as a blood thinner precursor, and was classified as a Schedule I in 1985
Mithoefer 2010 and follow-up with same patients (2013)
Primary Outcome: reduction in CAPS assessed score. CAPS is a widely used structured interview for quantifying PTSD symptoms that has excellent psychometric properties of reliability and validity. Outcome measured 4 days after each of two 8 hou experimental sessions
Inclusions: 21-70 years old; TR-PTSD (crime- or war-related); CAPS ≥50 following at least 3 months of SSRI or SNRI treatment with 6 months psychotherapy
Exclusions: Borderline personality disorder; any Axis I disorder (except anxiety, affective disorders other than bipolar type 1, substance abuse/dependence in remission, or an eating disorder without purging)
Researchers cautious of potential neurotoxicity and cognitive impairment as ADRs, based on research
Didn’t find any long-term ADRs relating to these
Zolpidem was administered following 60.7% of MDMA sessions and after 68.8% of psychotherapy-only sessions (p=0.77).
PTSD patients have insomnia problems and were at an unfamiliar place
17/20 subjects, the majority of whom had pre-existing PTSD-related sleep disturbance, received zolpidem during study participation.
Benzodiazepines were administered following 47.0% of MDMA sessions and after 37.5% of psychotherapy-only sessions (p=0.57).
In F/U – ALL participants answered “Yes” to the question, “Do you believe more MDMA sessions would have been helpful?”
Previous study:
20 subjects with treatment-resistant PTSD were randomly assigned to psychotherapy with the active drug or with inactive placebo and psychotherapy, each administered during two 8-hour sessions scheduled 3–5 weeks apart, accompanied by weekly non-drug sessions.
Mean CAPS and IES-R scores at LTFU for the 16 study completers weren’t statistically different from their 2-month mean scores
Participants described the experimental treatment as being helpful, sometimes dramatically so (“The therapy made it possible for me to live”), but also as being difficult at times (“one of the toughest things I have ever done”). Several participants described it as a step in an “ongoing process” rather than simply a completed cure.
Mithoefer et al. concluded that larger studies should be done to gauge MDMA efficacy and safety in a larger population of PTSD patients
Some additional Schedule I drugs are being reconsidered for medical use, with varied results
Some additional Schedule I drugs are being reconsidered for medical use, with varied results
Cannabis seems to fit the criteria for Schedule II more than it does Schedule I…
Several national professional organizations have openly expressed support of medicinal cannabis through position statements:
The American Academy of Family Physicians
The American Academy of HIV Medicine (AAHIVM)
The American Academy of Pain Medicine
The American Medical Students Association
The American Nurses Association (ANA)
The American Public Health Association (APHA)
British Medical Association
HIV Medicine Association of the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA)
The Lymphoma Foundation of America (LFA)
The National Association for Public Health Policy
Epilepsy Foundatio
The National Nurses Society on Addictions
Several professional organizations specific to New York have done the same:
New York AIDS Advisory Council
New York AIDS Coalition
New York County Medical Society
New York State AIDS Advisory Council
New York State Hospice and Palliative Care Association
New York State Nurses Association
New York Statewide Senior Action Council
Many other organizations (and federal officials) have had high-ranking members release statements supporting the use of medicinal cannabis