In Continuous Quantum Iteration (CQI) theory, a new approximation of the universal engagement is explored. Science, as of yet, cannot define infinity; the absolute beginning. Yet it is only natural that science should ask the question....How did the local Universe get started? And where does this energy keep coming from? And what is the quantum vacuum really doing? Aspects of virtual quantum iteration are examined considering the plausibility of this new approximation. The Cosmic Microwave (CMB), and the Infra-Red Background (CIRB) are shown to be simple effects of Continual Quantum Vacuum Iterations occurring through Planck-Stoney scale interactions with the universal equilibrium event - horizon background.

1. The Cosmic Microwave (CMB), and Infra-Red (CIRB) Backgrounds
are Simple Effects of Continual Quantum Vacuum Iteration
Abstract
In Continuous Quantum Iteration (CQI) theory, a new approximationofthe universal
engagement is explored. Science,as of yet, cannot define infinity; the absolute beginning.
Yet it is only natural that science should ask the question....Howdid the local Universe get
started? And where does this energy keep coming from? And what is the quantum vacuum
really doing? Aspects of virtual quantum iterationare examinedconsidering the
plausibilityof this new approximation. The Cosmic Microwave (CMB), and the Infra-Red
Background (CIRB) are shown to be simple effects of Continual Quantum Vacuum
Iterations occurring through Planck-Stoney scale interactions withthe universal
equilibrium event - horizon background.
Introduction
In the many attempts to interpret and complete our understanding of cosmological
observations withinthe Big Bang conjecture, the Planck Epochis oftenrepresented as a
united idea.However, this “Epoch” is actually a mix of many ideas that are perhaps validly
applied to this scale of the universe, and perhaps not. When Max Planck declared that “All
matteroriginates and exists only by virtue of a force...” we can assume that he primarily
meant to say that there is no free lunch. In most current descriptions,the idea of a “Big
Bang” as emanating from a single point in the universe is now characterizedas
“misleading”,andthen a proviso is given that it “really” occurs everywhere at once (this
before anywhere existed). There are many characterizations ranging from “Big Bounce -
Big Crunch”, to “The Big Bang - Something from Nothing”,and yet others, it appeared to me
a worthy effort to join the fight in order to posit something new, which I call Continuous
Quantum Iteration(CQI) theory.
The Greater “Infinite” Universe
We will start with the propositionthat thoughundefined, the greateruniverse is indeed
infinite,and that our present local universe is in equilibrium with this greater universe
which resides beyond 1. An infinite state pre-exists all possible beginnings.Our simple
inabilityto imagine the finite as an ultimate context simplyimplies that some infinite state
really does pre-exist all possible beginnings,and therefore some present and local
universal quantum vacuum or space-time,thoughnot satisfactorilyresolvedis inevitable.
Given4, a close estimate ofthe total energy for a closed universal horizonat 4.0748e+70J and
thinking in terms of Archimedeandisplacement, we intuit that this amount of energy could

2. never... under current physical laws appear at a single point in space; this excludes the
Planck scale as a single entry point for the “Big Bang”, thus,... we considera continuous
“holographic” or “virtual particle” basis for our observations.
What is the quantum vacuum doing?
The underlying (or over-riding) mechanism for(CQI) theory is that the greater infinite
universe likely achieves superpositions towards and within our universe thru virtual
quantum vacuum iterations.These iterations are believedto be exclusive to the Planck-
Stoney scale... for it is in this regime that represents the limits of energy reception in our
current space1, however, we note the direct influence of the Planck scale on all particles in
nature, thus we focus now on the Planck – Stoney regime (or complex). Briefly, that the
virtual particle background... (derived from the quantum vacuum) must indeed be
dominated by precise and observable wavelengths.
These wavelengths, (the CMB and CIRB) are obtainedusing existing relationships between
the total permissible universalenergy and the Planck-Stoney energy complex 2,3, being the
number of iterations ( permissible in a quantum multiplicitystate,defined as the
Universal energy (EU) divided by the particle energy; in the most particular case the Stoney
energy (ES).
A particular and observable wavelength
An adequate proposal can be made delineated from the Equilibrium Universe value 5 ; a
specific universal black hole energy of 4.075e+70J, and its virtual de Broglie radius of
7.758615e-97m, with a virtual allowed period of 2.588e-105s.
Simply put,
Thus we have a potentialof 2.083118e+61 continuous quantum iterations or Planckian
entrance points.. The number of these microstates ina Planck macro-state is called its
multiplicity. These yield the full universal energy.
Each repetition,being a "process iteration" demands (or enjoys) the maximum possible
energy available in quantum space-time,which in this case above, is the Planck energy.
Also, this multiplicity,being associated with the Planckian macro-state,determines the

3. “greatest” uncertainty possible for being in a particular microstate,orin other words.... in
thermal equilibrium.
Iteration entry point area
Selecting differing energies will produce a different iterationconstant and differing
resulting entrance surface areas. The area of each individual iterationentry point can be
calculated multiplying iteration (multiplicity) (entrance points) by the Berkenstein
Hawking black hole area constant 6.
Thus, for the Planck energy, each complete multiplicity would produce the following area
constant.
However the Planckian field, though providing the independent resonance functions of all
particles; exists inparallel with the electromagnetic quantum charge field. These two
effective fields are separatedby the constant alpha (α).
Specifically the value
√
We note that this value is often found in QCD. In this study we claim that the virtual particle
background of the Planck-Stoney quantum vacuum is indeed observable at a particular set
of wavelengths, which are oftenreferred to as the CMB and CIRB.
In Table 1 below we see length and mass derivations of both Planck and Stoney, note the
preeminence of the unit of charge “e” in the Stoney units. We remember that this charge
“e+- ” is also part of the fundamental natural physical basis of our universe.
Quantity Expression Metric value
Stoney Length
√
1.381×10−36 m
Planck length
√
1.616×10−35 m
Stoney Mass
√
1.859×10−9 kg
Planck mass
√
2.176×10−8 kg

4. To emphasize boththe validity and the potential of what is, (in essence),a virtual quantum
effect, we will demonstrate the Stoney energy calculations,though the results using both
the Planck energy, and zero-point energy are also shown.
√
This was done for two reasons; first,the Stoney energy gives an exact CMB fit, and, as is
often neglected, the Stoneyenergy provides unity charge/gravitational force containment
for all particles, at any radius... see Table 2 below.
Table 2. Note the ratio of Columbic force and Gravitationalforce for particles at theirde
Broglie and Schwarzschild Radii. At all radii conceivable, for the Planck mass it is the
constant alpha, for the Stoney mass it is unity.
Thus, for the Stoney mass as shown above, and converted to energy, the number of
iterations would be.
Each complete cycle of iterations (multiplicity) would produce the following area.
Having the area of entrance we calculate its constant radius
√
Description Mass (kg)
Ratio of Columbic
Force to
Gravitational Force at
Sch Radius
Ratio of Columbic Force
to
Gravitational Force at dB
Radius
Stoney 1.859273E-09 1.000000E+00 1.000E+00
Planck 2.176000E-08 7.300767E-03 7.301E-03

5. being the constant entrance radius.
√
And finally a wavelength for these entrance points
This wavelength yields a frequency of 473.88 GHZ. We compared this Stoneyenergy to the
close fitting Planck values which were the Zero-Point - ½ Planck energy and the Planck
energy itself, and the CMB results are shown below in Figure 1, and Cosmic Infra-Red
Background (CIRB)coincidences are shown in Figure 2. Note the precise fit of the charged
based Stoneyenergy value as comparedto the more generally accepted Planck energy
values. This occurs because of the unity ratio of the Columbic force to the Gravitational
force for the Stoney mass in all cases. The CMB will never be the same.
(Stoney) 473.88 GHZ (½ Planck) 1146.5 GHZ (Planck) 1621.358 GHZ
Figure 1. CMB Frequency matching for quantum iterations.7

6. (½ Planck) 1146.5 GHZ (Planck) 1621.358 GHZ
Likely 2nd Harmonic
Figure 2. The Cosmic Infra-Red Background (CIRB)8
Planck values which are the Zero-Point - ½ Planck energy and the Planck energy itself,are
shown here above in Figure 2, note the Cosmic Infra-Red Background (CIRB) coincidences.
Conclusion
A testable hypothesis
So we have then that all of this essentiallyoccurs simultaneously....ina continually
occurring Planck-Stoney Epoch. This is the virtual particle background scaling signature of
the Planck-Stoney Complex quantum vacuum, indeed observable at a particular set of
wavelengths, which are oftenreferred to as the CMB and CIRB. For other scales (i.e. proton,
neutron, and electron iterations),there are also likely measurable/observable effects,
particularly for the prevalence of the Planck constant ( ), making this theory justifiable.
This is because the proton, neutron, and electron are currently understoodto be
completely dependent on the Planckian quantum background1.
Filling the quantum vacuum does not require close packing, and at least from the Planck
scale thru to the CMB scale (which includes stable particles)... a long wait doesn’t exist.
Observation of the cosmic microwave background CMB radiation,in this case confirms an

7. almost exact temperature in all directions overthe sky, predicted here by CQI. That
entangled photons are ubiquitouslycommon is also necessary in this model.
Finally, we noted above that the ratio of the Columbic force to the Gravitationalforce for
the Stoney mass is unity at any radius. This unique characteristic provides evidence to
confirm this first approximation, defining not only the CMB and CIRB, but all other
observable regimes.
References
1. https://www.academia.edu/15609497/Beyond_the_Universe_How_Planck_scale_de
terminism_arises_to_inform_quantum_mechanics
2. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1412.2040.pdf
3. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stoney_units
4. https://www.academia.edu/36441746/The_Whole_Universe_from_First_Principles
5. https://www.academia.edu/4228885/Is_the_universe_in_equilibrium
6. Leonard Susskind Stanford & KITP Aug 25, 2013 'Inside Black Holes'
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yMRYZMv0jRE ; time at 24:40 min.
7. http://webhome.phy.duke.edu/~kolena/cmb.htm
8. http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/CIBR/
Notes:
1. The Planck force to its own Gravitationalequilibrium force (Mp*G) yields the
Iteration Constant, or
2. Thus, for the Planck energy, each complete multiplicitywould produce the following
area constant.
And the simple square root of this area constant yields the Zero-point” (½ Planck)
Gravitationalequilibrium radius:
√
3. Also, the Stoneymass and the “zero-point” (½ Planck) mass are in correlation.
4. This is possiblythe moment in which bothspace and charge are created.
5. The whole universe is effectively recreated every Planck time, Stoney time,and
then following in all other regimes.
6. The reason why the IterationFormula (givenabove) takes its current “multiplicity”
form.... is mass/energyequivalence.
As shown here confirmed.....

8. (yet, the IterationFormula itself, seems especially applicable for the Universe as a
whole entity...at the Planck –Stoney Scale); i.e. only multiplying the Planck -Stoney
Scale Masses by the Berkenstein Hawking constant bring good approximations of
Gravitationalentrance radii, yet these radii are results of BLACK HOLE RADII! (note:
Planck Mass yields Rs/Rdb=2 0.707Planck Mass yields Rs/Rdb=1 “Zero-point”
(½ Planck) yields Rs/Rdb= ½ Stoney Mass yields Rs/Rdb=2α)
However, in contrast, for all particles,the following applies for the Graviton/Weyl
de Broglie radius https://www.academia.edu/36045586/Pursuing_Weyls_Speculation