The document summarizes several studies on the impact of technology on student learning and success. The CARET study found that increased computer-assisted instruction can positively influence student outcomes in areas like achievement, problem-solving, and career preparation. The Harvey-Woodall study supported that technological classroom integration leads to better results than conventional instruction. The Pitler study implied that technology can benefit students by allowing for self-belief, note-taking, homework, hypothesis testing, and group learning. A Turner study showed that widespread campus wireless internet provides students flexibility, freedom, and improved communication and collaboration.

1. Steven James Basty
Studies Linking Technology with Learning June 1, 2010
CARET Study
Major Changes Ahead for Material Delivery
Pitler Study
Implications of Technology on College Students
Wireless Internet Availability for College Students
Responsibilities of Institutional Administration
Success is within our reach!
Reference List

2. Studies Linking Technology with
Learning (K-12)
 CARET Study
 Harvey-Woodall Study
 Brabec, Fisher & Pitler
study
(All studies favor use &
Technology Access  Student Success! implementation of
technology)

3. Conclusion of Study:
Increased levels of computer-assisted
CARET Study instructional applications can positively
Study conducted by members of
the Center for Applied Research in influence student learning outcomes.
Educational Technology (CARET).
Influenced outcomes revolved
around the areas of:
a) Achievement in content-area
learning
b) Problem-solving skill
development
c) Career preparation
Question:
Can computer instructional
programs enhance student
learning?

4. Major Changes Ahead for Class
Material Delivery
Power of Technology w/ Student engagement w/
Measurable Objectives Technology
 Capability of stimulating  More “student-centered
boosts in arithmetic, reading instruction”
skills, etc. (Measurable skills)  Success depends heavily on
 Changes on the horizon for ability and buy-in of the
classroom instruction educator
 Results supported by Harvey-
Woodall study
Technological Classroom Integration > Conventional Instruction

5. According to the Pitler study… Summarizing
Ability to
Homework, compare &
& Note taking contrast
practice, pre
Self-belief paration
and
achievement
Knowing
the right
questions
to ask
Technology Forming & Testing
Hypotheses
Setting
Goals
Nonconventional
retention of
knowledge
Group
focused
learning

6. What are
the
implications
of
technology
on college
students?

7. Wireless Internet Availability for
College Students Freedom to choose
location of study
Turner, et. al. study
shows the vitality of Better
having wireless internet Learning
Environment
widely accessible
throughout college
campuses nationwide.
Easier to collaborate Improved
on group projects communication
Wireless with classmates
& instructors
Internet
Flexibility
of time

8. Responsibilities of Institutional
Administration
Professors: Others in Administration:
 Must be supportive, willing to  Form a long-term sustainable
change old teaching habits to plan to develop curriculum
usher in a new era of teaching w/ wireless capabilities
style & rigor  Implement professional
 Willing to incorporate training models
technology into curriculum  Encourage campus depts. to
whenever possible adopt new curricula to
remain aligned w/ other
campuses preparing students
for lifelong careers

9. Success is Within our Reach!

10. Cradler, J., McNabb, M., Freeman, M., Burchett, R. (2002). “How Does Technology Influence Student Learning?” U.S.
& Canada, International Society for Technology in Education
http://caret.iste.org/caretadmin/news_documents/StudentLearning.pdf
Harvey‐Woodall, Antionette (2009). “Integrating Technology into the Classroom: How Does It Impact Student
Achievement?” http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/recordDetailaccno=ED505984
Brabec, K., Fisher, K., Pitler, H. (2004). Building Better Instruction: How Technology Supports Nine Research-Proven
Instructional Strategies. Learning & Leading with Technology 31(5), 6-11.
http://www.mcrel.org/topics/EducationalTechnology/products/236/
Greaves, T., Hayes, J. (2008). “America’s Digital Schools 2008: The Six Trends to Watch.” The Greaves Group, The
Hayes Connection. http://www.mdredsolutions.com/pdfs/ADS08_intro.pdf
Lu, Y., Ma, H., Turner, S., (2004). How Are College Students Using Wireless Internet to Facilitate Learning? Research
Center for Educational Technology, Kent State University. http://www.rcet.org/research/ATT-OLN/Yong-Ma-Turner-
Final.pdf