Download as PDF, PPTX
Uploaded byDr. Marci Shepard
Teacher and Principal Evaluation School Board Study
The document outlines the importance of teamwork within the Orting School District to enhance student success, emphasizing that effective collaboration is integral to achieving educational goals. It provides details on the Teacher and Principal Evaluation Program (TPEP), including its evaluation criteria, implementation schedule, and the role of assessments in improving teacher effectiveness and student learning. The document also discusses the framework for educator evaluations, highlighting criteria for comprehensive assessments, timelines for implementation, and the focus on student growth rubrics.
More Related Content
Similar to Teacher and Principal Evaluation School Board Study
Teacher and Principal Evaluation School Board Study
- 1. Orting School DistrictTPEP Working Together as a System Dr. Marci Shepard January 3, 2013
- 2. Teamwork This isthe case with any team. If one cog of the wheel doesn't work, the entire team grinds to a halt. We should never discount the importance of teamwork - people working together towards a common goal - in assuring our ultimate success. The success of our students is our joint responsibility, and when they succeed, it is to our joint credit and cumulative accomplishment. Orting School District Teaching, Learning and Assessment M. Shepard January 2013
- 3. Principals Central Office School Teachers Board TPEP Orting School District Teaching, Learning and Assessment M. Shepard January 2013 1/31/2013 3
- 4. I can explainTPEP and describe how it impacts our district and my role. School Board District State Orting School District Teaching, Learning and Assessment M. Shepard January 2013
- 5. Orting School District Teaching, Learning and Assessment M. Shepard January 2013 1/31/2013 5
- 6. Orting School District Teaching, Learning and Assessment M. Shepard January 2013 1/31/2013 6
- 7. I can explainTPEP and describe how it impacts our district and my role. School Board District State Orting School District Teaching, Learning and Assessment M. Shepard January 2013
- 8. I can explainTPEP and describe how it impacts our district and my role. Evaluation System Overview State criteria, teacher evaluations and principal evaluations Definitions Implementation schedule Scoring and student growth measures RIG and eVAL Reflection and feedback Orting School District Teaching, Learning and Assessment M. Shepard January 2013
- 9. EVALUATION SYSTEM OVERVIEW OrtingSchool District Teaching, Learning and Assessment M. Shepard January 2013
- 10. • Should teacherand principal evaluations be for GROWTH or ACCOUNTABILITY? • 6696 • Race to the Top/ ESEA Waiver • 5895 Orting School District Teaching, Learning and Assessment M. Shepard January 2013
- 11. Why measure educatoreffectiveness? While there are many formative and summative reasons to measure teacher and principal effectiveness, we believe the ultimate goal of all measurement should be… to improve teaching and student learning. Orting School District Teaching, Learning and Assessment M. Shepard January 2013 1/31/2013 11
- 12. Before and After– A Snapshot Before Component After Binary – Sat/Unsat 2 tiers Tiers 4 tiers-professional growth and development system Developed over 25 years ago Criteria Describes effective teaching & leadership – developed by stakeholders in 2010 legislative session 2 years (prior to ‘09-’10) Provisional Status 3 years No existing requirement Educator Educator Evaluation data must be evaluation Data Evaluation Data evaluation submitted to OSPI, beginning ‘10-’11, for all employee groups Orting School District Teaching, Learning and Assessment M. Shepard January 2013 1/31/2013 12
- 13. CEL 5D Orting SchoolDistrict Teaching, Learning and Assessment M. Shepard January 2013
- 14. Orting School District Teaching, Learning and Assessment M. Shepard January 2013
- 15. I can explainTPEP and describe how it impacts our district and my role. Evaluation System Overview State criteria, teacher evaluations and principal evaluations Definitions Implementation schedule Scoring and student growth measures RIG and eVAL Reflection and feedback Orting School District Teaching, Learning and Assessment M. Shepard January 2013
- 16. State Criteria Teacher Evaluation PrincipalEvaluation Orting School District Teaching, Learning and Assessment M. Shepard January 2013
- 17. 1/31/2013 17
- 18. 1/31/2013 18
- 19. Orting School District Teaching, Learning and Assessment M. Shepard January 2013
- 20. Principal Evaluation Orting School District Teaching, Learning and Assessment M. Shepard January 2013
- 21. TPEP Criteria Themes Themes: Centering instruction on Creating a high culture Exhibiting expectations Demonstrating collaborative effective Closing the Ensuring and collegial teaching gap school safety practices pracitces Communicating Teacher Principal with parents and Evaluation Individualizing Engaging Evaluation Planning with shcool instruction communities data community Criteria Criteria Use student Managing Aligning Subject matter data to modify resources curriculum knowledge instruction Fostering a safe, Improving positive learning instruction environment Orting School District Teaching, Learning and Assessment M. Shepard January 2013
- 22. Orting School District Teaching, Learning and Assessment M. Shepard January 2013
- 23. I can explainTPEP and describe how it impacts our district and my role. Evaluation System Overview State criteria, teacher evaluations and principal evaluations Definitions Implementation schedule Scoring and student growth measures RIG and eVAL Reflection and feedback Orting School District Teaching, Learning and Assessment M. Shepard January 2013
- 24. Definitions Classroom teacher Principal Comprehensive evaluation Focused evaluation Orting School District Teaching, Learning and Assessment M. Shepard January 2013
- 25. “Certificated Classroom Teacher”Definition • Designed for “classroom teachers” • Teachers who provide academically-focused instruction to students • Districts determine best fit Orting School District Teaching, Learning and Assessment M. Shepard January 2013 1/31/2013 25
- 26. Orting School District Teaching, Learning and Assessment M. Shepard January 2013
- 27. Comprehensive Evaluation forTeachers • Assesses all 8 evaluation criteria • All criteria contribute to the comprehensive evaluation rating • Student growth rubrics embedded in Criterion 3, 6 and 8 • All provisional classroom teachers and any classroom teacher not on level 3 or level 4 receive comprehensive evaluation • All classroom teachers shall receive a comprehensive summative evaluation at least once every four years Orting School District Teaching, Learning and Assessment M. Shepard January 2013 1/31/2013 27
- 28. “Principal” Definition • Designed for certificated principals and assistant principals • Districts determine best fit Orting School District Teaching, Learning and Assessment M. Shepard January 2013 1/31/2013 28
- 29. Comprehensive Evaluation forPrincipals • Assesses all 8 evaluation criteria • All criteria contribute to the comprehensive evaluation rating • Student growth rubrics embedded in Criterion 3, 5 and 8 “Due to the importance of instructional leadership and assuring rater agreement among evaluators, particularly those evaluating teacher performance, school districts are encouraged to conduct comprehensive summative evaluations of principal performance on an annual basis.” Orting School District Teaching, Learning and Assessment M. Shepard January 2013 1/31/2013 29
- 30. Orting School District Teaching, Learning and Assessment M. Shepard January 2013
- 31. Focused Evaluation • Includesan assessment of one of the 8 criteria • Student growth rubrics from one of the 3 criterion If a teacher chooses 3, 6 or 8, their accompanying student growth rubrics will be used If a teacher chooses criterion 1, 2, 4, 5, or 7, the accompanying student growth rubrics from criterion 3 or 6 will be used • Approved by the teacher or principal’s evaluator • A focused evaluation must be performed in any year that a comprehensive evaluation is not scheduled (both teachers and principals) Orting School District Teaching, Learning and Assessment M. Shepard January 2013 1/31/2013 31
- 32. Orting School District Teaching, Learning and Assessment M. Shepard January 2013
- 33. I can explainTPEP and describe how it impacts our district and my role. Department District State Orting School District Teaching, Learning and Assessment M. Shepard January 2013
- 34. I can explainTPEP and describe how it impacts our district and my role. Evaluation System Overview State criteria, teacher evaluations and principal evaluations Definitions Implementation schedule Scoring and student growth measures RIG and eVAL Reflection and feedback Orting School District Teaching, Learning and Assessment M. Shepard January 2013
- 35. State and District IMPLEMENTATIONSCHEDULE Orting School District Teaching, Learning and Assessment M. Shepard January 2013
- 36. 5895 Timeline 2013-2014 Must begin implementation Teacher evaluation Begin rubrics implementation All teachers must have comprehensive evaluation Instructional TPEP Pilot framework 2015-2016 & TPEP info Orting School District Teaching, Learning and Assessment M. Shepard January 2013 1/31/2013 36
- 37. Orting School District • 2010-2011 • Information sharing • Instructional framework (5D) • 2011-2012 • TPEP Team • 4-year implementation plan • Teacher evaluation rubrics • Information sharing • Instructional framework (5D) • 2012-2013 • RIG District/RIG Team • TPEP Pilot/TPEP Team • Transition plan • Principal evaluation rubrics • Teacher evaluation rubrics • Information sharing • Instructional framework (5D) • 2013-2014 • Implementation (2 likely models) Orting School District Teaching, Learning and Assessment M. Shepard January 2013
- 38. Implementation Schedule • Steeringcommittee recommends all districts move to the new evaluation criteria for all classroom teachers and principals in 2013-2014, with some classroom teachers on the focused and some on the comprehensive. • 5895 requires provisional or probationary teachers, and principals with fewer than 3 years of experience, unsatisfactory performance, or new to the district to be transitioned first. Nothing prevents earlier transition. • All districts must begin implementation in 2013-2014 school year and by fully implemented by 2016. Orting School District Teaching, Learning and Assessment M. Shepard January 2013 1/31/2013 38
- 39. OSD 3-Year TransitionPlan DRAFT 1/31/2013 39 Orting School District Teaching, Learning and Assessment M. Shepard January 2013
- 40. I can explainTPEP and describe how it impacts our district and my role. Evaluation System Overview State criteria, teacher evaluations and principal evaluations Definitions Implementation schedule Scoring and student growth measures RIG and eVAL Reflection and feedback Orting School District Teaching, Learning and Assessment M. Shepard January 2013
- 41. 5895 and ESEAWaiver SCORING EVALUATIONS STUDENT GROWTH MEASURES Orting School District Teaching, Learning and Assessment M. Shepard January 2013
- 42. Raw Score Model Determined December 1st Orting School District Teaching, Learning and Assessment M. Shepard January 2013 Preliminary 1/31/2013 42
- 43. Evaluation Summative ScoringProcess Orting School District Teaching, Learning and Assessment M. Shepard January 2013 1/31/2013 43
- 44. Defining Key Terms •Student Achievement: The status of subject-matter knowledge, understandings, and skills at one point in time. • Student Growth (Learning): The growth in subject-matter knowledge, understandings, and skill over time. It is student growth, not student achievement, that is relevant in demonstrating impacts teacher and principals have on students. Orting School District Teaching, Learning and Assessment M. Shepard January 2013 1/31/2013 44
- 45. Student Growth Rubrics •The TPEP steering committee organizations approved statewide rubrics for student growth to ensure consistency in implementation of the evaluation system across Washington State. • The rubrics for student growth describe both goal-setting and outputs of student learning. • OSPI has provided student growth rubrics for each of the three criterion Teachers – 3, 6 and 8 Principals – 3, 5 and 8 Note: 3/5 of the student growth rubrics for teachers are goal setting. Orting School District Teaching, Learning and Assessment M. Shepard January 2013 1/31/2013 45
- 46. Orting School District Teaching, Learning and Assessment M. Shepard January 2013
- 47. Orting School District Teaching, Learning and Assessment M. Shepard January 2013
- 48. Orting School District Teaching, Learning and Assessment M. Shepard January 2013
- 49. Summative Rating and Impacton Student Learning Matrix Orting School District Teaching, Learning and Assessment M. Shepard January 2013
- 50. Orting School District Teaching, Learning and Assessment M. Shepard January 2013
- 51. I can explainTPEP and describe how it impacts our district and my role. Evaluation System Overview State criteria, teacher evaluations and principal evaluations Definitions Implementation schedule Scoring and student growth measures RIG and eVAL Reflection and feedback Orting School District Teaching, Learning and Assessment M. Shepard January 2013
- 52. Support and Resources REGIONALIMPLEMENTATION GRANTS EVAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Orting School District Teaching, Learning and Assessment M. Shepard January 2013
- 53. Orting School District Teaching, Learning and Assessment M. Shepard January 2013
- 54. About 2/3 districts Orting School District Teaching, Learning and Assessment M. Shepard January 2013
- 55. Orting School District Teaching, Learning and Assessment M. Shepard January 2013
- 56. Next Steps 1/31/2013 56 Orting School District Teaching, Learning and Assessment M. Shepard January 2013
- 57. QUESTIONS? Orting School District Teaching, Learning and Assessment M. Shepard January 2013 1/31/2013 57
- 58. I can explainTPEP and describe how it impacts our district and my role. Evaluation System Overview State criteria, teacher evaluations and principal evaluations Definitions Implementation schedule Scoring and student growth measures RIG and eVAL Reflection and feedback Orting School District Teaching, Learning and Assessment M. Shepard January 2013
- 59. I can explainTPEP and describe how it impacts our district and my role. School Board District State Orting School District Teaching, Learning and Assessment M. Shepard January 2013
- 60. Think: What areimplications for the school board/your role? Orting School District Teaching, Learning and Assessment M. Shepard January 2013 1/31/2013 60
- 61. I can explainTPEP and describe how it impacts our district and my role. Orting School District Teaching, Learning and Assessment M. Shepard January 2013 1/31/2013 61
- 62. School TPEP Supt’s Board Teaching, Office Learning, Assessment Teachers Special Technology Services Principals HR Business Orting School District Teaching, Learning and Assessment M. Shepard January 2013 When systems align and work together, real progress is made. 1/31/2013 62
- 63. Next steps? …and feedback Orting School District Teaching, Learning and Assessment M. Shepard January 2013
- 64. Orting School DistrictTPEP Working Together as a System Dr. Marci Shepard January 3, 2013