TABLET COATING
PREPARED BY : DR. MEHWISH NISAR
TABLET COATING
• THE TECHNIQUE OF WRAPPING A TABLET TO HIDE ITS TASTE, MAKE IT SIMPLER
TO SWALLOW, OR SAFEGUARD THE ACTIVE INGREDIENT IS KNOWN AS TABLET
COATING.
PURPOSE OF COATING
• DEFENSE AGAINST AIR, LIGHT, AND MOISTURE. SHIELDING API FROM DIGESTIVE
JUICES. IMPROVED TABLET IDENTIFICATION. PREVENT ADVERSE EFFECTS. GIVES
MEDICINE WITH A DELAYED RELEASE.
TYPES OF TABLET COATING
• THERE ARE MAINLY 3 TYPES OF COATING
• SUGAR COATING
• FILM COATING
• ENTERIC COATING
SUGAR COATING
• THE TABLETS WILL BE COATED WITH A SOLUTION BASED ON SUGAR (SUCROSE)
IN THIS PROCESS. IT'S DONE WITH COATING PANS THAT ARE POSITIONED AT A
40 ANGLE AND HAVE VARYING CAPACITIES. WATER SOLUBLE, THE COATING
MELTS AWAY WHEN SWALLOWED.
STEPS OF SUGAR COATING
• THE SUGAR COATING INVOLVES FOLLOWING STEPS:
• I. SEALING
• II. SUB COATING
• III. SYRUPING
• IV. FINISHING
• V. POLISHINH
FILM COATING
• THIS METHOD IS APPLIED MORE FREQUENTLY THAN SUGAR COATING. A THIN
POLYMER LAYER IS DEPOSITED AROUND THE TABLET CORE DURING THIS
PROCEDURE. BECAUSE OF THE EXTREMELY THIN FILM THAT IS CREATED, THE
TABLET IS SMALLER AND LIGHTER. FOR INSTANCE, EC (ETHYLE CELLULOSE),
HPMC (HYDROXY PROPYL METHYLE CELLULOSE), AND HPC (HYDROXY PROPYL
CELLULOSE).
ENTERIC COATING
• TABLETS WITH ENTERIC COATINGS OFFER FEATURES FOR DELAYED RELEASE. THE
TABLET ARE NTENDED TO DISSOLVE AND PERMIT DRUG ABSORPTION IN THE
INTESTINES AFTER PASSING THROUGH THE STOMACH UNALTERED. LIKE ASPIRIN,
OMEPRAZOLE, ETC.
EQUIPMENTS USED FOR COATING
• 1. CONVENTIONAL PAN COATER
• PELLIGRINI COATING PAN
• IMMERSION TUBE COATING PAN
• 2. PERFORATED PAN SYSTEM
• ACCELA-COTA PAN
• DRIA COATER PAN
3. FLUIDIZED BED SYSTEM
CONVENTIONAL PAN COATER
PELLIGRINI COATING PAN
IMMERSION TUBE COATING PAN
PERFORATED PAN SYSTEM
FLUIDIZED BED SYSTEM
TABLET DEFECTS
• PICKING & STICKING
• CAPPING & LAMINATION
• MOTTLING
• DOUBLE IMPRESSION
• POOR MIXING
• POOR FLOW
• WEIGHT VARIATION
• HARDNESS VARIATION
• PUNCH VARIATION
PICKING AND STICKING
DEFECTS, REASON AND CORRECTION
DEFECTS
• PICKING AND STICKING
• PICKING- MATERIAL ADHERENCE TO PUNCH FACE CAUSES REMOVAL OF MATERIAL
FROM TABLET SURFACE.
• STICKING - ADHERENCE OF TABLET MATERIAL TO THE DIE WALLS.
• CAUSES DIFFICULTY IN EJECTION OF TABLET.
• IMPROPER DESIGNING OF ENGRAVED PUNCHES.
REASON
• POOR MAINTENANCE OF PUNCHES SURFACES.
• USE OF WORN OUT PUNCHES AND DIES
• UNDER DRIED GRANULES.
• CORRECTIONS
• PROPER DESIGNING OF PUNCHES.
• CHROME PLATING OF PUNCH SURFACES.
• PROPER QUANTITY OF ANTI-ADHERENTS.
• ADEQUATE DRYING OF GRANULES.
• DEFECTS
• CAPPING & LAMINATION:
• CAPPING - PARTIAL OR TOTAL SEPARATION OF TOP OR BOTTOM PORTIONS OF THE
TABLET.
• LAMINATION - SEPARATION OF TABLET IN TWO OR MORE LAYERS.
CAPPING & LAMINATION
REASON
• ENTRAPMENT OF AIR IN GRANULES.
• EXCESS FINES IN GRANULES.
• EXCESSIVE DRYING OF GRANULES.
• USE OF DEFECTIVE PUNCHES AND DIES.
CORRECTION
• REDUCE THE PERCENTAGE OF FINES IN GRANULES.
• MAINTENANCE OF DESIRED AMOUNT OF MOISTURE IN GRANULES.
• REPLACEMENT OF DEFECTIVE PUNCHES & DIES
MOTTLING
DEFECTS
• MOTTLING:
• UNEVEN DISTRIBUTION OF COLOUR ON THE SURFACE OF TABLETS
REASON
• VARIATIONS IN MEDICATION AND ADDITIVE COLORS. COLOR MIGRATION TO
THE GRANULE SURFACE WHEN THEY DRY. INCORRECT COLOR DISPERSION IN
THE BULK POWDER. BIGGER DYE/LAKE PARTICLES.
CORRECTION
APPLYING A DYE CAPABLE OF BLENDING THE COLORS OF EVERY COMPONENT.
GRANULES AT A LOW TEMPERATURE THROUGH DRYING. EMPLOYING ULTRAFINE-
PARTICLE DYES OR LAKES.
DOUBLE IMPRESSION
DEFECT
DOUBLE IMPRESSION
MONOGRAM DOUBLE IMPRESSION ON TABLET’S BOTTOM SURFACE. OCCURS WHEN
THERE IS A MONOGRAM ON THE LOWER PUNCH.
REASONS
• A FRESH, LIGHTER IMPRESSION APPEARS ON THE TABLET’S BOTTOM DUE TO
THE LOWER PUNCH’S FREE ROTATIONAL MOTION FOLLOWING COMPRESSION.
TWO COMPRESSION STEPS ARE USED BY TABLET COMPRESSION MACHINES.
CORRECTION
• BY LIMITING THE UNWELCOME MOBILITY OF THE BLOWS.
DEFECT
INEFFECTIVE BLENDING
REASON
INEQUITABLE GLIDANT AND LUBRICANT DISTRIBUTION. SHORTER MIXING TIME
WHILE ADDING LUBRICANT.
PREVENTION
PROPER LUBRICANT MIXING.
DEFECT
POOR FLOW
• IMPROPER FLOW OF POWDER FROM HOPPER TO DIE CAVITY LEADING TO INCOMPLETE FILLING
OF DIE CAVITY.
REASONS
• PARTICULATE SOLIDS MOVING UNDER GRAVITY ARE SUBJECTED TO UNEVEN PRESSURE FORM
MASS ABOVE AND ALONG SIDE.
• HOPPER VIBRATION/ MIXING ACTION LEADING TO SEGREGATION OF PARTICLES (LARGE
PARTICLE ON TOP & SMALL PARTICLE IN BOTTOM)
• ARCHING/ BRIDGING/ RAT HOLING.
PREVENTION
• ADDITION OF GLIDANT (TALC, COLLOIDAL SILICA)
• USING INDUCED DIE FEEDERS
• RESTRICTING THE FLOW OF HOPPER.
WEIGHT VARIATION IN TABLETS
DEFECT
WEIGHT VARIATION
THE WEIGHT OF TABLETS WILL NOT BE CONSISTENT.
REASONS
INSUFFICIENT GRANULE FLOW. GRANULES' UNEVEN DISTRIBUTION OF PARTICLE
SIZES. HEFTY FINES BEING IN PLACE.
CORRECTION
APPLY LUBRICANT AND GLIDEANT CONCENTRATIONS THAT ARE APPROPRIATE. BY
THE GRANULES' CONSISTENT SIZE DISTRIBUTION. LOWERING THE PERCENTAGE OF
FINES.
VARIATION IN HARDNESS
DEFECT
• VARIATION IN HARDNESS
• THE HARDNESS OF TABLETS VARIES.
REASONS
IF THE DIE CAVITY'S VOLUME AND COMPOSITION CHANGE. THE SPACE BETWEEN
BLOWS FLUCTUATES, AS DOES THE INTENSITY.
DEFECT
PUNCH VARIATION
VARIATIONS IN THE LENGTH OF THE PUNCH.
REASONS
DIE CAVITY FILL VOLUME IS ALTERED BY SHORTER PUNCHES. PRECAUTION: MAKE
USE OF DIE CONTROL PROGRAMS AND HIGH-QUALITY PUNCHES WITH
CONSISTENT DIMENSIONS.
tablet coating and tablet defects.pptx for

tablet coating and tablet defects.pptx for

  • 1.
    TABLET COATING PREPARED BY: DR. MEHWISH NISAR
  • 2.
    TABLET COATING • THETECHNIQUE OF WRAPPING A TABLET TO HIDE ITS TASTE, MAKE IT SIMPLER TO SWALLOW, OR SAFEGUARD THE ACTIVE INGREDIENT IS KNOWN AS TABLET COATING.
  • 3.
    PURPOSE OF COATING •DEFENSE AGAINST AIR, LIGHT, AND MOISTURE. SHIELDING API FROM DIGESTIVE JUICES. IMPROVED TABLET IDENTIFICATION. PREVENT ADVERSE EFFECTS. GIVES MEDICINE WITH A DELAYED RELEASE.
  • 4.
    TYPES OF TABLETCOATING • THERE ARE MAINLY 3 TYPES OF COATING • SUGAR COATING • FILM COATING • ENTERIC COATING
  • 5.
    SUGAR COATING • THETABLETS WILL BE COATED WITH A SOLUTION BASED ON SUGAR (SUCROSE) IN THIS PROCESS. IT'S DONE WITH COATING PANS THAT ARE POSITIONED AT A 40 ANGLE AND HAVE VARYING CAPACITIES. WATER SOLUBLE, THE COATING MELTS AWAY WHEN SWALLOWED.
  • 6.
    STEPS OF SUGARCOATING • THE SUGAR COATING INVOLVES FOLLOWING STEPS: • I. SEALING • II. SUB COATING • III. SYRUPING • IV. FINISHING • V. POLISHINH
  • 7.
    FILM COATING • THISMETHOD IS APPLIED MORE FREQUENTLY THAN SUGAR COATING. A THIN POLYMER LAYER IS DEPOSITED AROUND THE TABLET CORE DURING THIS PROCEDURE. BECAUSE OF THE EXTREMELY THIN FILM THAT IS CREATED, THE TABLET IS SMALLER AND LIGHTER. FOR INSTANCE, EC (ETHYLE CELLULOSE), HPMC (HYDROXY PROPYL METHYLE CELLULOSE), AND HPC (HYDROXY PROPYL CELLULOSE).
  • 8.
    ENTERIC COATING • TABLETSWITH ENTERIC COATINGS OFFER FEATURES FOR DELAYED RELEASE. THE TABLET ARE NTENDED TO DISSOLVE AND PERMIT DRUG ABSORPTION IN THE INTESTINES AFTER PASSING THROUGH THE STOMACH UNALTERED. LIKE ASPIRIN, OMEPRAZOLE, ETC.
  • 9.
    EQUIPMENTS USED FORCOATING • 1. CONVENTIONAL PAN COATER • PELLIGRINI COATING PAN • IMMERSION TUBE COATING PAN • 2. PERFORATED PAN SYSTEM • ACCELA-COTA PAN • DRIA COATER PAN 3. FLUIDIZED BED SYSTEM
  • 10.
  • 11.
  • 12.
  • 13.
  • 14.
  • 15.
    TABLET DEFECTS • PICKING& STICKING • CAPPING & LAMINATION • MOTTLING • DOUBLE IMPRESSION • POOR MIXING • POOR FLOW • WEIGHT VARIATION • HARDNESS VARIATION • PUNCH VARIATION
  • 16.
  • 17.
    DEFECTS, REASON ANDCORRECTION DEFECTS • PICKING AND STICKING • PICKING- MATERIAL ADHERENCE TO PUNCH FACE CAUSES REMOVAL OF MATERIAL FROM TABLET SURFACE. • STICKING - ADHERENCE OF TABLET MATERIAL TO THE DIE WALLS. • CAUSES DIFFICULTY IN EJECTION OF TABLET. • IMPROPER DESIGNING OF ENGRAVED PUNCHES. REASON • POOR MAINTENANCE OF PUNCHES SURFACES. • USE OF WORN OUT PUNCHES AND DIES • UNDER DRIED GRANULES.
  • 18.
    • CORRECTIONS • PROPERDESIGNING OF PUNCHES. • CHROME PLATING OF PUNCH SURFACES. • PROPER QUANTITY OF ANTI-ADHERENTS. • ADEQUATE DRYING OF GRANULES. • DEFECTS • CAPPING & LAMINATION: • CAPPING - PARTIAL OR TOTAL SEPARATION OF TOP OR BOTTOM PORTIONS OF THE TABLET. • LAMINATION - SEPARATION OF TABLET IN TWO OR MORE LAYERS.
  • 19.
  • 20.
    REASON • ENTRAPMENT OFAIR IN GRANULES. • EXCESS FINES IN GRANULES. • EXCESSIVE DRYING OF GRANULES. • USE OF DEFECTIVE PUNCHES AND DIES. CORRECTION • REDUCE THE PERCENTAGE OF FINES IN GRANULES. • MAINTENANCE OF DESIRED AMOUNT OF MOISTURE IN GRANULES. • REPLACEMENT OF DEFECTIVE PUNCHES & DIES
  • 21.
  • 22.
    DEFECTS • MOTTLING: • UNEVENDISTRIBUTION OF COLOUR ON THE SURFACE OF TABLETS REASON • VARIATIONS IN MEDICATION AND ADDITIVE COLORS. COLOR MIGRATION TO THE GRANULE SURFACE WHEN THEY DRY. INCORRECT COLOR DISPERSION IN THE BULK POWDER. BIGGER DYE/LAKE PARTICLES. CORRECTION APPLYING A DYE CAPABLE OF BLENDING THE COLORS OF EVERY COMPONENT. GRANULES AT A LOW TEMPERATURE THROUGH DRYING. EMPLOYING ULTRAFINE- PARTICLE DYES OR LAKES.
  • 23.
  • 24.
    DEFECT DOUBLE IMPRESSION MONOGRAM DOUBLEIMPRESSION ON TABLET’S BOTTOM SURFACE. OCCURS WHEN THERE IS A MONOGRAM ON THE LOWER PUNCH. REASONS • A FRESH, LIGHTER IMPRESSION APPEARS ON THE TABLET’S BOTTOM DUE TO THE LOWER PUNCH’S FREE ROTATIONAL MOTION FOLLOWING COMPRESSION. TWO COMPRESSION STEPS ARE USED BY TABLET COMPRESSION MACHINES. CORRECTION • BY LIMITING THE UNWELCOME MOBILITY OF THE BLOWS.
  • 25.
    DEFECT INEFFECTIVE BLENDING REASON INEQUITABLE GLIDANTAND LUBRICANT DISTRIBUTION. SHORTER MIXING TIME WHILE ADDING LUBRICANT. PREVENTION PROPER LUBRICANT MIXING.
  • 26.
    DEFECT POOR FLOW • IMPROPERFLOW OF POWDER FROM HOPPER TO DIE CAVITY LEADING TO INCOMPLETE FILLING OF DIE CAVITY. REASONS • PARTICULATE SOLIDS MOVING UNDER GRAVITY ARE SUBJECTED TO UNEVEN PRESSURE FORM MASS ABOVE AND ALONG SIDE. • HOPPER VIBRATION/ MIXING ACTION LEADING TO SEGREGATION OF PARTICLES (LARGE PARTICLE ON TOP & SMALL PARTICLE IN BOTTOM) • ARCHING/ BRIDGING/ RAT HOLING. PREVENTION • ADDITION OF GLIDANT (TALC, COLLOIDAL SILICA) • USING INDUCED DIE FEEDERS • RESTRICTING THE FLOW OF HOPPER.
  • 27.
  • 28.
    DEFECT WEIGHT VARIATION THE WEIGHTOF TABLETS WILL NOT BE CONSISTENT. REASONS INSUFFICIENT GRANULE FLOW. GRANULES' UNEVEN DISTRIBUTION OF PARTICLE SIZES. HEFTY FINES BEING IN PLACE. CORRECTION APPLY LUBRICANT AND GLIDEANT CONCENTRATIONS THAT ARE APPROPRIATE. BY THE GRANULES' CONSISTENT SIZE DISTRIBUTION. LOWERING THE PERCENTAGE OF FINES.
  • 29.
  • 30.
    DEFECT • VARIATION INHARDNESS • THE HARDNESS OF TABLETS VARIES. REASONS IF THE DIE CAVITY'S VOLUME AND COMPOSITION CHANGE. THE SPACE BETWEEN BLOWS FLUCTUATES, AS DOES THE INTENSITY. DEFECT PUNCH VARIATION VARIATIONS IN THE LENGTH OF THE PUNCH. REASONS DIE CAVITY FILL VOLUME IS ALTERED BY SHORTER PUNCHES. PRECAUTION: MAKE USE OF DIE CONTROL PROGRAMS AND HIGH-QUALITY PUNCHES WITH CONSISTENT DIMENSIONS.