Workshop	
  on	
  coupled	
  hydrological	
  modeling	
  –	
  Padova	
  –	
  September	
  2015	
  
A	
  dimensionally-­‐reduced	
  model	
  for	
  coupled	
  river-­‐
subsurface	
  flow	
  modeling	
  
Yi	
  Pan,	
  Sylvain	
  Weill,	
  Philippe	
  Ackerer,	
  Frederick	
  Delay	
  
	
  
Laboratory	
  of	
  Hydrology	
  and	
  Geochemistry	
  of	
  
Strasbourg	
  (LHyGeS)	
  
Workshop	
  on	
  coupled	
  hydrological	
  modeling	
  –	
  Padova	
  –	
  September	
  2015	
  
Outlines	
  
•  Context	
  /	
  MoIvaIon	
  
•  Models:	
  
–  The	
  dimensionally-­‐reduced	
  subsurface	
  model	
  
–  The	
  coupled	
  model	
  
•  Dimensionally-­‐reduced	
  subsurface	
  model	
  “validaIon”	
  
•  Inter-­‐comparison	
  with	
  CATHY	
  (Fully	
  dimensioned	
  Model)	
  
•  First	
  tests	
  on	
  the	
  Strengbach	
  catchment	
  
	
  
Workshop	
  on	
  coupled	
  hydrological	
  modeling	
  –	
  Padova	
  –	
  September	
  2015	
  
Context	
  /	
  MoIvaIon	
  
•  The	
  Strengbach	
  catchment	
  :	
  
–  Instrumented	
  and	
  surveyed	
  for	
  more	
  than	
  25	
  years	
  by	
  the	
  LHyGeS’	
  staff	
  
–  Mountainous	
  catchment	
  –	
  steep	
  slopes	
  (	
  30°)	
  –	
  Assumed	
  deep	
  bedrock	
  (>	
  
150	
  m	
  depth	
  at	
  the	
  ridge)	
  
–  Needs	
  for	
  integrated	
  simulaIon	
  to	
  beer	
  characterize	
  flow	
  pathways	
  and	
  
residence	
  Imes	
  	
  
•  Not	
  easy	
  to	
  simulate	
  this	
  catchment	
  with	
  integrated	
  tools	
  based	
  
on	
  the	
  3D	
  Richards	
  equaIon	
  for	
  subsurface	
  flow	
  
è	
  Development	
  of	
  a	
  simpler	
  approach	
  which	
  remains	
  physically-­‐
based,	
  distributed	
  and	
  integrated	
  	
  
Workshop	
  on	
  coupled	
  hydrological	
  modeling	
  –	
  Padova	
  –	
  September	
  2015	
  
The	
  dimensionally-­‐reduced	
  subsurface	
  model	
  
•  Basic	
  idea	
  :	
  to	
  develop	
  a	
  dimensionally-­‐reduced	
  subsurface	
  model	
  accounIng	
  
for	
  both	
  saturated	
  and	
  unsaturated	
  flow	
  processes	
  
•  IntegraIon	
  of	
  the	
  3D	
  Richards	
  equaIon	
  in	
  a	
  direcIon	
  perpendicular	
  to	
  the	
  
bedrock	
  from	
  bedrock	
  zb	
  	
  to	
  land	
  surface	
  zs	
  elevaIons	
  
	
  
	
  
•  Splibng	
  the	
  integral	
  by	
  introducing	
  the	
  water	
  table	
  elevaIon	
  zw	
  results	
  in	
  
( ) ( )( )( ). .
s s s
b b b
z z z
w w
z z z
S
h
S S dz h q dz
t t
dz
∂θ ∂⎛ ⎞
+ θ ∇ − θ ∇
∂⎝
=⎟
∂
+⎜
⎠
∫ ∫ ∫K
( ) ( ) ( )( )( )
( )( )( )
. .
. .
w s w
b w b
s s
w b
z z z
S w S w
w
z z z
z z
z z
h h
S S dz S S dz h
t t t t
h q dz
dz
dz
∂θ ∂ ∂θ ∂⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞
+ θ + θ ∇ − θ ∇⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟
∂ ∂ ∂ ∂⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠
∇ ∇
+ +
θ
+
=−
∫ ∫ ∫
∫ ∫
K
K
Workshop	
  on	
  coupled	
  hydrological	
  modeling	
  –	
  Padova	
  –	
  September	
  2015	
  
The	
  dimensionally-­‐reduced	
  subsurface	
  model	
  
•  SimplificaIons	
  :	
  
–  In	
  the	
  saturated	
  zone	
  :	
  	
  
–  In	
  the	
  vadose	
  zone	
  :	
  	
  
•  Further	
  assumpIons	
  :	
  
–  Flow	
  is	
  mainly	
  parallel	
  to	
  the	
  bedrock	
  
–  Pressure	
  profile	
  in	
  the	
  vadose	
  zone	
  is	
  hydrostaIc	
  
( )( )
( )
, ,
( )
( , )
( )
( ) . .
s
w
s
w
x y x y w
z
z
z
z
S h Ssat h
h
S h h Q with
t h dz
C h dz
h θ
⎧ = +
∂ ⎪
+∇ − θ ∇ = ⎨
∂ ⎪ + θ
⎩
= ∫
∫
T
Ksat KT
( )S wS S
t
∂θ
>> θ
∂
( )0 1wand S
t
∂θ
= θ =
∂
Workshop	
  on	
  coupled	
  hydrological	
  modeling	
  –	
  Padova	
  –	
  September	
  2015	
  
The	
  coupled	
  model	
  
•  Subsurface	
  equaIon	
  :	
  
•  Surface	
  equaIon	
  for	
  1D	
  river	
  flow	
  :	
  diffusive	
  wave	
  	
  
•  Coupling	
  :	
  first	
  order	
  law	
  
•  ResoluIon	
  :	
  
–  Fully	
  implicit	
  
–  Mixed	
  Hybrid	
  Finite	
  Elements	
  (Subsurface)	
  –	
  Finite	
  element	
  (Surface)	
  
–  Picard	
  algorithm	
  +	
  mass	
  lumping	
  +	
  adapIve	
  Ime	
  step	
  
	
  
( )( ), ,( ) . .x y x y w
h
S h h Q
t
∂
+∇ − θ ∇ =
∂
T
( )
( )
2 3
1 2
. 'h
x x r
Man x r
A R
A h z l q
t N h z
⎛ ⎞∂
⎜ ⎟−∇ ∇ + =
⎜ ⎟∂ ∇ +⎝ ⎠
Workshop	
  on	
  coupled	
  hydrological	
  modeling	
  –	
  Padova	
  –	
  September	
  2015	
  
Dimensionally-­‐reduced	
  subsurface	
  model	
  “validaIon”	
  
•  Inter-­‐comparison	
  between	
  the	
  dimensionally-­‐reduced	
  model	
  and	
  a	
  classical	
  
Richards	
  based	
  model	
  on	
  a	
  2D	
  verIcal	
  cross	
  secIon	
  (Weill	
  et	
  al,	
  Hydrological	
  
Processes,	
  submiAed)	
  
•  Geometry	
  inheriIng	
  of	
  the	
  Strengbach	
  catchment	
  
è	
  176	
  000	
  elements	
  for	
  Richards	
  /	
  12	
  000	
  elements	
  for	
  the	
  dimensionally-­‐reduced	
  model	
  
	
  
Workshop	
  on	
  coupled	
  hydrological	
  modeling	
  –	
  Padova	
  –	
  September	
  2015	
  
Dimensionally-­‐reduced	
  subsurface	
  model	
  “validaIon”	
  
•  4	
  subsurface	
  configuraIons	
  : 	
  	
  
–  Homogeneous	
  	
  
–  3	
  layers	
  	
  
–  30	
  layers	
  /	
  constant	
  VG	
  
parameters	
  
–  Random	
  field	
  of	
  saturated	
  
hydraulic	
  conducIvity/	
  
constant	
  VG	
  parameters	
  
•  IniIal	
  	
  and	
  boundary	
  condiIons	
  :	
  
–  Water	
  table	
  located	
  3	
  m	
  
below	
  land	
  surface	
  iniIally	
  
–  Dirichlet	
  BC	
  downstream	
  
–  Rainfall	
  rate	
  of	
  100	
  mm/day	
  
during	
  5	
  days,	
  over	
  a	
  line	
  
between	
  x	
  =	
  0	
  and	
  50	
  m	
  
(upstream)	
  aker	
  11	
  days	
  of	
  
simulaIon	
  
Ksat	
  (m/
day)
ω	
  (-­‐) 	
  θr	
  (-­‐) 	
  α	
  (m-­‐1) 	
  n	
  (-­‐)	
  
	
  
Depth	
  	
  
(m)
10 0.1 0.0106 2 2 0	
  –	
  3
1 0.1 0.0106 1.5 1.8 3	
  –	
  4
0.1 0.1 0.0106 1.05 1.4 4	
  –	
  5	
  
Workshop	
  on	
  coupled	
  hydrological	
  modeling	
  –	
  Padova	
  –	
  September	
  2015	
  
Results	
  –	
  homogeneous	
  configuraIons	
  
Section 1 – x = 150 m Section 1 – x = 150 m
Section 2 – x = 300 m Section 3 – x = 425 m
Workshop	
  on	
  coupled	
  hydrological	
  modeling	
  –	
  Padova	
  –	
  September	
  2015	
  
Results	
  –	
  Random	
  saturated	
  conducIvity	
  
Section 1 – x = 150 m
Section 2 – x = 300 m Section 3 – x = 425 m
Section 1 – x = 150 m
Workshop	
  on	
  coupled	
  hydrological	
  modeling	
  –	
  Padova	
  –	
  September	
  2015	
  
Inter-­‐comparison	
  with	
  CATHY	
  
•  Pan	
  et	
  al,	
  Journal	
  of	
  Hydrology,	
  accepted	
  
•  IniIal	
  /	
  Boundary	
  condiIons	
  :	
  	
  
–  IniIal	
  water	
  table	
  1m	
  below	
  land	
  surface	
  
–  Imposed	
  discharge	
  upstream	
  /	
  No-­‐flow	
  for	
  the	
  subsurface	
  
1D	
  link	
  cons+tuing	
  the	
  river
	
  	
  
	
  	
  
CATHY	
  model
VIC	
  model
10	
  m	
  deep	
  aquifer
Sx	
  =	
  0.05
	
  	
  
	
  	
  
2D	
  meshes	
  cons+tuing	
  the	
  river
	
  	
  
Workshop	
  on	
  coupled	
  hydrological	
  modeling	
  –	
  Padova	
  –	
  September	
  2015	
  
Inter-­‐comparison	
  with	
  CATHY	
  
Workshop	
  on	
  coupled	
  hydrological	
  modeling	
  –	
  Padova	
  –	
  September	
  2015	
  
TentaIve	
  applicaIon	
  –	
  Strengbach	
  catchment	
  
Workshop	
  on	
  coupled	
  hydrological	
  modeling	
  –	
  Padova	
  –	
  September	
  2015	
  
Conclusions	
  
•  Reminder	
  
–  Dimensionally-­‐reduced	
  subsurface	
  model	
  seems	
  a	
  relevant	
  approach	
  
–  First	
  tests	
  and	
  applicaIons	
  of	
  the	
  coupled	
  model	
  are	
  not	
  flawed	
  
•  LimitaIons	
  
–  HydrostaIc	
  pressure	
  profile	
  
–  No	
  2D	
  overland	
  flow	
  	
  
–  Impossible	
  to	
  describe	
  Horton’s	
  runoff	
  
•  PerspecIves	
  
–  Add	
  2D	
  overland	
  flow	
  
–  Work	
  on	
  transport	
  processes	
  
–  Coupling	
  with	
  vegetaIon/atmosphere	
  models	
  for	
  beer	
  spaIally	
  and	
  Imely	
  
distributed	
  source	
  terms	
  
Workshop	
  on	
  coupled	
  hydrological	
  modeling	
  –	
  Padova	
  –	
  September	
  2015	
  
Proposal	
  for	
  the	
  next	
  workshop	
  (2017?)	
  !	
  To	
  be	
  held	
  in	
  
Strasbourg?	
  	
  

Sylvain Weill

  • 1.
    Workshop  on  coupled  hydrological  modeling  –  Padova  –  September  2015   A  dimensionally-­‐reduced  model  for  coupled  river-­‐ subsurface  flow  modeling   Yi  Pan,  Sylvain  Weill,  Philippe  Ackerer,  Frederick  Delay     Laboratory  of  Hydrology  and  Geochemistry  of   Strasbourg  (LHyGeS)  
  • 2.
    Workshop  on  coupled  hydrological  modeling  –  Padova  –  September  2015   Outlines   •  Context  /  MoIvaIon   •  Models:   –  The  dimensionally-­‐reduced  subsurface  model   –  The  coupled  model   •  Dimensionally-­‐reduced  subsurface  model  “validaIon”   •  Inter-­‐comparison  with  CATHY  (Fully  dimensioned  Model)   •  First  tests  on  the  Strengbach  catchment    
  • 3.
    Workshop  on  coupled  hydrological  modeling  –  Padova  –  September  2015   Context  /  MoIvaIon   •  The  Strengbach  catchment  :   –  Instrumented  and  surveyed  for  more  than  25  years  by  the  LHyGeS’  staff   –  Mountainous  catchment  –  steep  slopes  (  30°)  –  Assumed  deep  bedrock  (>   150  m  depth  at  the  ridge)   –  Needs  for  integrated  simulaIon  to  beer  characterize  flow  pathways  and   residence  Imes     •  Not  easy  to  simulate  this  catchment  with  integrated  tools  based   on  the  3D  Richards  equaIon  for  subsurface  flow   è  Development  of  a  simpler  approach  which  remains  physically-­‐ based,  distributed  and  integrated    
  • 4.
    Workshop  on  coupled  hydrological  modeling  –  Padova  –  September  2015   The  dimensionally-­‐reduced  subsurface  model   •  Basic  idea  :  to  develop  a  dimensionally-­‐reduced  subsurface  model  accounIng   for  both  saturated  and  unsaturated  flow  processes   •  IntegraIon  of  the  3D  Richards  equaIon  in  a  direcIon  perpendicular  to  the   bedrock  from  bedrock  zb    to  land  surface  zs  elevaIons       •  Splibng  the  integral  by  introducing  the  water  table  elevaIon  zw  results  in   ( ) ( )( )( ). . s s s b b b z z z w w z z z S h S S dz h q dz t t dz ∂θ ∂⎛ ⎞ + θ ∇ − θ ∇ ∂⎝ =⎟ ∂ +⎜ ⎠ ∫ ∫ ∫K ( ) ( ) ( )( )( ) ( )( )( ) . . . . w s w b w b s s w b z z z S w S w w z z z z z z z h h S S dz S S dz h t t t t h q dz dz dz ∂θ ∂ ∂θ ∂⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞ + θ + θ ∇ − θ ∇⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠ ∇ ∇ + + θ + =− ∫ ∫ ∫ ∫ ∫ K K
  • 5.
    Workshop  on  coupled  hydrological  modeling  –  Padova  –  September  2015   The  dimensionally-­‐reduced  subsurface  model   •  SimplificaIons  :   –  In  the  saturated  zone  :     –  In  the  vadose  zone  :     •  Further  assumpIons  :   –  Flow  is  mainly  parallel  to  the  bedrock   –  Pressure  profile  in  the  vadose  zone  is  hydrostaIc   ( )( ) ( ) , , ( ) ( , ) ( ) ( ) . . s w s w x y x y w z z z z S h Ssat h h S h h Q with t h dz C h dz h θ ⎧ = + ∂ ⎪ +∇ − θ ∇ = ⎨ ∂ ⎪ + θ ⎩ = ∫ ∫ T Ksat KT ( )S wS S t ∂θ >> θ ∂ ( )0 1wand S t ∂θ = θ = ∂
  • 6.
    Workshop  on  coupled  hydrological  modeling  –  Padova  –  September  2015   The  coupled  model   •  Subsurface  equaIon  :   •  Surface  equaIon  for  1D  river  flow  :  diffusive  wave     •  Coupling  :  first  order  law   •  ResoluIon  :   –  Fully  implicit   –  Mixed  Hybrid  Finite  Elements  (Subsurface)  –  Finite  element  (Surface)   –  Picard  algorithm  +  mass  lumping  +  adapIve  Ime  step     ( )( ), ,( ) . .x y x y w h S h h Q t ∂ +∇ − θ ∇ = ∂ T ( ) ( ) 2 3 1 2 . 'h x x r Man x r A R A h z l q t N h z ⎛ ⎞∂ ⎜ ⎟−∇ ∇ + = ⎜ ⎟∂ ∇ +⎝ ⎠
  • 7.
    Workshop  on  coupled  hydrological  modeling  –  Padova  –  September  2015   Dimensionally-­‐reduced  subsurface  model  “validaIon”   •  Inter-­‐comparison  between  the  dimensionally-­‐reduced  model  and  a  classical   Richards  based  model  on  a  2D  verIcal  cross  secIon  (Weill  et  al,  Hydrological   Processes,  submiAed)   •  Geometry  inheriIng  of  the  Strengbach  catchment   è  176  000  elements  for  Richards  /  12  000  elements  for  the  dimensionally-­‐reduced  model    
  • 8.
    Workshop  on  coupled  hydrological  modeling  –  Padova  –  September  2015   Dimensionally-­‐reduced  subsurface  model  “validaIon”   •  4  subsurface  configuraIons  :     –  Homogeneous     –  3  layers     –  30  layers  /  constant  VG   parameters   –  Random  field  of  saturated   hydraulic  conducIvity/   constant  VG  parameters   •  IniIal    and  boundary  condiIons  :   –  Water  table  located  3  m   below  land  surface  iniIally   –  Dirichlet  BC  downstream   –  Rainfall  rate  of  100  mm/day   during  5  days,  over  a  line   between  x  =  0  and  50  m   (upstream)  aker  11  days  of   simulaIon   Ksat  (m/ day) ω  (-­‐)  θr  (-­‐)  α  (m-­‐1)  n  (-­‐)     Depth     (m) 10 0.1 0.0106 2 2 0  –  3 1 0.1 0.0106 1.5 1.8 3  –  4 0.1 0.1 0.0106 1.05 1.4 4  –  5  
  • 9.
    Workshop  on  coupled  hydrological  modeling  –  Padova  –  September  2015   Results  –  homogeneous  configuraIons   Section 1 – x = 150 m Section 1 – x = 150 m Section 2 – x = 300 m Section 3 – x = 425 m
  • 10.
    Workshop  on  coupled  hydrological  modeling  –  Padova  –  September  2015   Results  –  Random  saturated  conducIvity   Section 1 – x = 150 m Section 2 – x = 300 m Section 3 – x = 425 m Section 1 – x = 150 m
  • 11.
    Workshop  on  coupled  hydrological  modeling  –  Padova  –  September  2015   Inter-­‐comparison  with  CATHY   •  Pan  et  al,  Journal  of  Hydrology,  accepted   •  IniIal  /  Boundary  condiIons  :     –  IniIal  water  table  1m  below  land  surface   –  Imposed  discharge  upstream  /  No-­‐flow  for  the  subsurface   1D  link  cons+tuing  the  river         CATHY  model VIC  model 10  m  deep  aquifer Sx  =  0.05         2D  meshes  cons+tuing  the  river    
  • 12.
    Workshop  on  coupled  hydrological  modeling  –  Padova  –  September  2015   Inter-­‐comparison  with  CATHY  
  • 13.
    Workshop  on  coupled  hydrological  modeling  –  Padova  –  September  2015   TentaIve  applicaIon  –  Strengbach  catchment  
  • 14.
    Workshop  on  coupled  hydrological  modeling  –  Padova  –  September  2015   Conclusions   •  Reminder   –  Dimensionally-­‐reduced  subsurface  model  seems  a  relevant  approach   –  First  tests  and  applicaIons  of  the  coupled  model  are  not  flawed   •  LimitaIons   –  HydrostaIc  pressure  profile   –  No  2D  overland  flow     –  Impossible  to  describe  Horton’s  runoff   •  PerspecIves   –  Add  2D  overland  flow   –  Work  on  transport  processes   –  Coupling  with  vegetaIon/atmosphere  models  for  beer  spaIally  and  Imely   distributed  source  terms  
  • 15.
    Workshop  on  coupled  hydrological  modeling  –  Padova  –  September  2015   Proposal  for  the  next  workshop  (2017?)  !  To  be  held  in   Strasbourg?