Sustainable Energy Management: Reducing Waste with Lifecycle Thinking

International Journal of Advanced Research in Basic Engineering Sciences and Technology (IJARBEST)
ISSN (ONLINE):2456-5717 Vol.8, Issue.5, May 2022
Sustainable Energy Management: Reducing Waste
with Lifecycle Thinking
Rajini K R Karduri
Assurance Advisor
Worley Group Inc.
Houston, USA
Dr. Christo Ananth
Professor
Samarkand State University
Uzbekistan
Abstract— This paper examines the principles
of sustainable energy management with a focus on
reducing waste through lifecycle thinking. It
explores the various stages of energy production,
distribution, and consumption, and identifies
opportunities for waste minimization and resource
optimization. The study highlights the importance
of integrating lifecycle assessment (LCA) in
energy systems to achieve sustainability goals and
proposes a framework for energy stakeholders to
incorporate these principles into practice.
Keywords— Sustainable Energy; Waste
Reduction; Lifecycle Thinking; Lifecycle
Assessment; Resource Optimization.
I. INTRODUCTION
In the realm of energy management,
sustainability has emerged as a paramount concern,
reflecting the imperative to meet present energy
demands without compromising the ability of future
generations to meet their own. The introduction of
sustainable energy management practices is not
merely an environmental or ethical consideration
but a comprehensive approach that encompasses
economic and social dimensions. Central to this
approach is the reduction of waste across all facets
of energy systems, from production to consumption.
Waste in energy systems manifests in
various forms, including inefficient use of
resources, unnecessary energy consumption, and the
generation of by-products that are not effectively
utilized. The traditional linear model of energy
production and consumption—extract, use, and
dispose—has led to significant environmental
degradation, resource depletion, and economic
inefficiencies. As the global population grows and
the demand for energy escalates, the unsustainable
nature of this linear model becomes increasingly
untenable.
Lifecycle thinking offers a paradigm shift in
how energy systems are conceptualized and
managed. It is a holistic approach that considers the
entire lifespan of an energy system, from the
extraction of raw materials to the ultimate disposal
or recycling of its components. By evaluating the
environmental, economic, and social impacts at
each stage of the energy lifecycle, stakeholders can
identify opportunities for reducing waste and
optimizing resource use.
The relevance of lifecycle thinking in energy
management is multifaceted. It encourages the
design of energy systems that are more efficient and
adaptable to changing resource availabilities and
technologies. It promotes the use of renewable
energy sources that can be sustainably managed
over time. Moreover, it fosters the development of
closed-loop systems where waste is minimized, and
by-products are repurposed, leading to a reduction
in the overall environmental footprint of energy
production and consumption.
Incorporating lifecycle thinking into energy
management also aligns with broader sustainability
goals, such as those articulated in the United
Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). It
supports the transition towards cleaner energy
sources, enhances energy security by reducing
dependence on finite resources, and contributes to
economic growth by fostering innovation and
creating new markets for sustainable energy
technologies.
The introduction of this paper sets the stage
for a comprehensive exploration of sustainable
energy management through the lens of lifecycle
thinking. It underscores the urgency of waste
reduction in our current energy systems and
delineates the potential of lifecycle thinking to
revolutionize energy management practices. The
55

subsequent sections will delve into the theoretical
underpinnings of lifecycle thinking, present
methodologies for its application in energy systems,
and explore practical strategies for waste reduction,
culminating in a discussion of policy
recommendations and future directions for
sustainable energy management.
Figure 1: Sustainable Energy Management and Lifecycle Thinking. Credit: Author
II. THEORETICAL BACKGROUND
A. Definitions and Principles of Lifecycle Thinking
Lifecycle Thinking (LCT) is an integrated
concept within environmental management that
acknowledges that all stages of a product's life cycle
(from raw material extraction through to end-of-life
disposal) can lead to significant environmental and
economic burdens.
Key Principles of Lifecycle Thinking
include:
▪ Holistic Perspective: Instead of looking at a
single phase of the product lifecycle, LCT
requires considering every phase from
cradle to grave—or, in more sustainable
frameworks, from cradle to cradle.
▪ Resource Efficiency: It focuses on using
resources more efficiently, thereby reducing
the overall environmental impact and
improving economic performance.
▪ Waste Minimization: LCT aims to minimize
waste at every stage of the product lifecycle,
including energy waste.
▪ Extended Producer Responsibility:
Producers are encouraged to take
responsibility for the entire lifecycle of their
products, especially for the take-back,
recycling, and final disposal.
▪ Informed Decision Making: LCT provides
data and insights that help consumers and
organizations make more informed decisions
56

that reflect the true cost of products and
services.
B. The Role of Lifecycle Assessment in Energy
Management
Lifecycle Assessment (LCA) is a systematic
set of procedures for compiling and examining the
inputs and outputs of energy and materials and the
environmental impacts directly attributable to the
functioning of a product or service throughout its
lifecycle.
Key Aspects of LCA in Energy
Management include:
▪ Energy Efficiency: LCA helps identify
stages where energy use is highest and
where improvements can be made to
increase overall efficiency.
▪ Renewable Energy: It aids in assessing the
viability and environmental benefits of using
renewable energy sources over non-
renewable ones.
▪ Carbon Footprint: LCA is instrumental in
calculating the carbon footprint of energy
systems, which is essential for climate
change mitigation strategies.
▪ Policy Making: LCA provides valuable data
for developing energy policies and
regulations that aim for sustainability.
C. Previous Studies on Waste Reduction in Energy
Systems
A number of studies have been conducted
on waste reduction in energy systems, focusing on
various aspects such as:
▪ Improving Process Efficiency: Studies have
looked at how to optimize energy use in
industrial processes to reduce waste.
▪ Energy Recovery: Research has been done
on capturing waste energy (like heat from
industrial processes) and converting it into
electricity or using it for heating purposes.
▪ Material Substitution: Some studies have
investigated the replacement of energy-
intensive materials with those that require
less energy to produce.
▪ Sustainable Design: There is a growing body
of literature on designing products and
systems in a way that they use less energy
throughout their lifecycle.
▪ Decentralized Energy Systems: Research
into small-scale, localized energy systems
has shown potential for reducing
transmission losses and promoting waste
reduction.
III. METHODOLOGY
Sustainable energy management is a critical
component in the global shift towards a more
resilient and environmentally conscious society. It
encompasses a comprehensive approach to energy
production, distribution, and consumption, with an
emphasis on minimizing waste and maximizing
efficiency throughout the entire lifecycle of energy
systems. This paper delves into the methodology of
sustainable energy management, focusing on
lifecycle thinking as a means to reduce waste and
optimize energy use.
A. Research Approach and Framework
The research approach to sustainable energy
management with lifecycle thinking is inherently
interdisciplinary, combining principles from
environmental science, engineering, economics, and
policy studies. The framework for this research is
built around the concept of the lifecycle assessment
(LCA), which provides a systematic process for
evaluating the environmental impacts associated
with all the stages of a product's life from cradle to
grave (i.e., from raw material extraction through
materials processing, manufacture, distribution, use,
repair and maintenance, and disposal or recycling).
The LCA methodology is particularly well-
suited to the study of energy systems as it allows for
a comprehensive analysis of energy inputs and
outputs, as well as associated wastes and emissions
at each stage of the energy lifecycle. This holistic
view is crucial for identifying opportunities for
waste reduction and for making informed decisions
that lead to more sustainable energy management
practices.
B. Data Collection Methods
Data collection for lifecycle assessment in
energy systems involves gathering quantitative and
qualitative information from a variety of sources.
57

Quantitative data may include energy inputs and
outputs, emission levels, material throughputs, and
waste generation figures. This data is often obtained
from direct measurements, energy audits,
environmental monitoring, and process modeling.
Qualitative data, on the other hand, might
encompass information on regulatory compliance,
stakeholder perspectives, and socio-economic
impacts.
Primary data collection is typically preferred
as it provides the most specific and accurate
information about the system being studied.
However, when primary data is not available,
secondary data from databases, literature, and
industry reports can be used. The key is to ensure
that the data is relevant, reliable, and representative
of the system under study.
C. Analytical Methods
The analytical methods used in evaluating
waste reduction strategies within the framework of
sustainable energy management involve both
qualitative and quantitative techniques. Quantitative
analysis might include material flow analysis
(MFA), energy balance calculations, and carbon
footprinting. These methods allow for the
quantification of waste streams, identification of
inefficiencies in energy use, and assessment of the
potential environmental impacts of different energy
management strategies.
Qualitative analysis is equally important,
particularly in the assessment of policy
implications, stakeholder impacts, and the social
acceptability of various waste reduction strategies.
Techniques such as stakeholder analysis, scenario
planning, and cost-benefit analysis are used to
evaluate the broader implications of energy
management decisions and to ensure that proposed
strategies are not only technically feasible but also
economically viable and socially equitable.
The methodology for sustainable energy
management with lifecycle thinking is
comprehensive and multifaceted, involving a blend
of research approaches, data collection methods,
and analytical techniques. By applying this
methodology, stakeholders can gain a deeper
understanding of the complex interactions within
energy systems and can develop strategies that
significantly reduce waste and lead to more
sustainable energy practices. The ultimate goal is to
create energy systems that are efficient,
environmentally friendly, and capable of meeting
the needs of present and future generations without
depleting resources or causing irreparable harm to
the environment.
IV. LIFECYCLE STAGES OF ENERGY SYSTEMS
Sustainable energy management is a holistic
approach that considers the entire lifecycle of
energy systems to minimize waste and
environmental impact. By examining each stage—
from extraction to end-of-life management—
stakeholders can identify opportunities for
improvement and implement strategies that
contribute to a more sustainable energy future.
A. Extraction and Production of Energy Resources
The initial stage in the lifecycle of energy
systems involves the extraction and production of
energy resources. This phase can have significant
environmental impacts, including habitat disruption,
water use, and pollution. Sustainable management
at this stage focuses on minimizing these impacts
through the use of cleaner extraction technologies,
the rehabilitation of mining sites, and the
development of alternative energy sources that are
less invasive to the environment. For instance, the
shift towards renewable energy sources like wind,
solar, and geothermal reduces the reliance on fossil
fuels and the associated environmental degradation.
B. Transportation and Distribution of Energy
Once extracted or produced, energy must be
transported and distributed to where it is needed.
This stage can lead to energy loss and increased
emissions, particularly when energy is transmitted
over long distances or involves inefficient
infrastructure. Improving the sustainability of this
stage includes upgrading transmission lines to
reduce losses, using smart grid technologies to
optimize the distribution of electricity, and
implementing stringent regulations for the
transportation of energy resources to prevent spills
and reduce emissions.
C. Consumption and End-Use Efficiency
The consumption stage is where energy is
converted into useful work, such as heating,
58

lighting, and powering machinery. End-use
efficiency is critical here; the more efficiently
energy is used, the less waste is produced.
Strategies to improve efficiency include the
adoption of energy-efficient appliances, industrial
process improvements, building retrofits for better
insulation, and the implementation of energy
management systems. Additionally, educating
consumers and businesses about energy-saving
practices can lead to significant reductions in
energy waste.
D. End-of-Life Management and Waste Recovery
The final stage in the lifecycle of energy
systems is end-of-life management and waste
recovery. This involves dealing with the waste
produced from energy consumption, such as
decommissioning old power plants, recycling
batteries from electric vehicles, and managing
electronic waste. Sustainable practices in this stage
focus on extending the life of energy-related
products through refurbishment and reuse, recycling
materials to recover valuable components, and
ensuring that waste is disposed of in an
environmentally responsible manner.
Incorporating lifecycle thinking into energy
management ensures that each stage is optimized to
reduce waste and environmental impact. For
example, by considering the end-of-life stage during
the design phase, products can be created to be
more easily disassembled and recycled. Similarly,
by evaluating the environmental impacts of
extraction and production, cleaner and more
sustainable methods can be prioritized.
Sustainable energy management requires a
comprehensive understanding of the lifecycle stages
of energy systems. By addressing the unique
challenges and opportunities at each stage, from
extraction to waste recovery, it is possible to reduce
waste, improve efficiency, and move towards a
more sustainable energy paradigm. This lifecycle
approach not only benefits the environment but also
enhances economic viability and social well-being,
contributing to the overall goal of sustainable
development.
V. WASTE REDUCTION STRATEGIES
Sustainable energy management
encompasses a broad spectrum of strategies aimed
at reducing waste throughout the lifecycle of energy
systems. By integrating technological innovations,
policy instruments, and behavioral changes, it is
possible to create a more efficient and less wasteful
energy landscape.
A. Technological Innovations for Waste Reduction
Technological advancements play a pivotal
role in minimizing waste in energy systems.
Innovations such as advanced metering
infrastructure (AMI) and smart grids enable more
precise control of energy distribution, reducing
losses and improving efficiency. In production, the
use of carbon capture and storage (CCS)
technologies can mitigate the environmental impact
of fossil fuel use. For renewable energy sources,
improvements in battery storage technologies allow
for better integration of intermittent energy sources
like wind and solar, minimizing waste through
enhanced load balancing and energy retention.
In the realm of consumption, the
development of high-efficiency appliances, LED
lighting, and low-energy heating and cooling
systems directly reduces the amount of energy
wasted in homes and businesses. Industrial waste
reduction is further achieved through process
optimization—using sensors and automation to
ensure that energy use is closely aligned with
production needs.
B. Policy Instruments and Regulatory Measures
Policy and regulation are critical in guiding
and enforcing waste reduction in energy
management. Governments can implement a variety
of policy instruments, such as energy efficiency
standards for buildings and appliances, which
compel manufacturers and builders to adhere to
strict efficiency criteria. Subsidies and tax
incentives for renewable energy investments can
shift the market away from wasteful energy
practices and towards more sustainable options.
Regulatory measures may also include
mandates for utility companies to achieve certain
percentages of energy savings or to incorporate a
minimum amount of renewable energy into their
portfolios. Carbon pricing mechanisms, such as cap-
and-trade systems or carbon taxes, create financial
incentives for reducing emissions and energy waste
by assigning a cost to carbon output.
59

C. Behavioral and Organizational Approaches to
Minimizing Waste
Beyond technology and policy, there is a
significant human element to waste reduction.
Behavioral approaches involve educating and
encouraging individuals and organizations to adopt
energy-saving habits. This can range from simple
actions like turning off lights when not in use to
more complex behavioral changes like adopting
energy-efficient practices in industrial operations.
Organizational approaches often involve the
implementation of energy management systems
(EMS) that monitor, control, and optimize the use
of energy. Companies can also pursue certification
under international standards like ISO 50001, which
provides a framework for establishing,
implementing, maintaining, and improving an
energy management system.
In addition, fostering a culture of
sustainability within organizations can lead to
significant waste reduction. When employees at all
levels are engaged in energy-saving practices and
motivated by a shared vision of sustainability, the
cumulative effect on waste reduction can be
substantial.
Reducing waste in sustainable energy
management requires a multifaceted approach that
combines the latest technological innovations with
robust policy frameworks and a commitment to
behavioral change. By leveraging these strategies, it
is possible to create an energy system that not only
meets our current needs but also preserves resources
for future generations, ensuring a cleaner and more
sustainable world.
VI. POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS
Sustainable energy management, when
viewed through the lens of lifecycle thinking,
presents a holistic approach to reducing waste and
enhancing efficiency across the entire spectrum of
energy production and consumption. To effectively
embed lifecycle thinking into the fabric of energy
management, policymakers must craft strategies
that incentivize all stakeholders—businesses,
consumers, and the energy industry at large—to
adopt practices that minimize waste and optimize
resource use.
A. Strategies for Policymakers to Encourage
Lifecycle Thinking
Policymakers can encourage lifecycle
thinking by developing educational programs that
raise awareness about the importance of considering
the full lifecycle of energy resources. This can be
achieved through public campaigns, integration into
school curricula, and professional development
programs that target industry leaders.
Regulations can also be designed to require
lifecycle assessments (LCAs) for significant energy
projects, ensuring that decision-makers have a
comprehensive understanding of the environmental
impacts associated with all stages of energy
production, distribution, and consumption.
B. Incentives for Businesses and Consumers
To motivate businesses and consumers to
adopt waste reduction practices, policymakers can
introduce a range of incentives. Financial
incentives, such as tax breaks or grants for
implementing energy-efficient technologies or for
conducting LCAs, can make sustainable practices
more economically viable.
Non-financial incentives might include
recognition programs, such as awards or
certifications for businesses that demonstrate
excellence in lifecycle energy management. These
recognitions can enhance a company's reputation
and serve as a marketing tool, showcasing their
commitment to sustainability.
C. Integration of LCA into National and
International Energy Policies
Integrating LCA into energy policies
requires a shift in regulatory frameworks to account
for the full environmental costs and benefits of
different energy choices. This could involve
mandating LCA studies for new energy policies or
for the approval of large energy infrastructure
projects.
At the international level, agreements and
protocols can be established to standardize LCA
methodologies, making it easier to compare and
assess the sustainability of energy practices across
borders. This would also facilitate international
trade in energy technologies and services that are
proven to be sustainable over their entire lifecycle.
60

Furthermore, international cooperation can
lead to the development of shared databases that
provide lifecycle inventory data, which is essential
for conducting accurate and reliable LCAs. Such
databases would enable policymakers and
businesses to make more informed decisions that
align with sustainability goals.
The integration of lifecycle thinking into
sustainable energy management is a complex but
necessary endeavor that requires concerted efforts
from policymakers at all levels. By implementing
strategies that promote education, incentivize waste
reduction, and embed LCA into energy policy
frameworks, it is possible to foster an energy
system that is not only efficient and sustainable but
also resilient in the face of environmental and
economic challenges. Through these measures,
policymakers can lead the transition towards a
future where energy management is intrinsically
linked with the principles of sustainability and
waste reduction.
VII. CONCLUSION
In the realm of sustainable energy
management, the adoption of lifecycle thinking
marks a pivotal shift towards a more holistic
understanding of energy systems. This approach
illuminates the interconnected stages of energy
production and consumption, revealing a spectrum
of opportunities for waste reduction and efficiency
enhancement.
The research into lifecycle thinking across
the energy sector has highlighted that each phase,
from the extraction of resources to the end-of-life
disposal, harbors potential for improvement. By
dissecting the energy lifecycle, we've identified
critical junctures where interventions can yield
substantial environmental and economic benefits.
This granular perspective not only aids in
pinpointing the most impactful strategies but also
fosters the development of innovative solutions that
align with sustainable practices.
The implications of integrating lifecycle
thinking into energy management are profound. It
promises a transformation of energy systems,
steering them towards resilience and sustainability.
This evolution is anticipated to foster new economic
models that value longevity and resourcefulness,
paving the way for a robust, low-carbon economy.
The synergy between renewable energy integration
and lifecycle thinking could revolutionize energy
grids, making them more adaptable to the ebb and
flow of sustainable energy sources.
Advancing the waste reduction agenda
necessitates a collective endeavor. It calls for an
educational paradigm shift, where the principles of
lifecycle thinking are ingrained in the consciousness
of all stakeholders involved in energy systems.
Supporting this shift are policies that incentivize
innovation in sustainable technologies and
practices, alongside a robust framework that
promotes the adoption of these practices.
The journey towards a sustainable energy
future is complex and multifaceted, yet the guiding
principle of lifecycle thinking offers a beacon of
clarity. By embedding this principle into the core of
energy management, we can aspire to a future
where energy is not just consumed judiciously but is
also managed with a profound appreciation for the
delicate ecological balance. The promise of
lifecycle thinking lies in its ability to reshape our
energy systems, ensuring that they contribute to a
sustainable, efficient, and waste-reduced world.
VIII. REFERENCES
[1] Karduri, Rajini Kanth Reddy. "Sustainable
Reutilization of Excavated Trench Material."
Civil & Environmental Engineering, 2012.
[2] Chittoori, Bhaskar, Anand J. Puppala,
Rajinikanth Reddy, and David Marshall.
"Sustainable Reutilization of Excavated
Trench Material." In GeoCongress 2012: State
of the Art and Practice in Geotechnical
Engineering, 4280-4289. 2012.
[3] Kalra, Prem K., Deepak Mishra, and Kanishka
Tyagi. "A novel complex-valued counter
propagation network." In 2007 IEEE
Symposium on Computational Intelligence
and Data Mining, 81-87. IEEE, 2007.
[4] Yadav, Sandeep Kumar, Kanishka Tyagi,
Brijeshkumar Shah, and Prem Kumar Kalra.
"Audio signature-based condition monitoring
of internal combustion engine using FFT and
correlation approach." IEEE Transactions on
Instrumentation and Measurement 60, no. 4
(2010): 1217-1226.
61

[5] Tyagi, Kanishka, Vaibhav Jindal, and Vipunj
Kumar. "A novel complex valued neuron
model for landslide assessment." In
Landslides and Engineered Slopes. From the
Past to the Future, Two Volumes+ CD-ROM,
979-984. CRC Press, 2008.
[6] Cai, Xun, Kanishka Tyagi, and Michael T.
Manry. "An optimal construction and training
of second order RBF network for
approximation and illumination invariant
image segmentation." In The 2011
International Joint Conference on Neural
Networks, 3120-3126. IEEE, 2011.
[7] Cai, Xun, Kanishka Tyagi, and Michael T.
Manry. "Training multilayer perceptron by
using optimal input normalization." In 2011
IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy
Systems (FUZZ-IEEE 2011), 2771-2778.
IEEE, 2011.
[8] Tyagi, Kanishka, Xun Cai, and Michael T.
Manry. "Fuzzy C-means clustering based
construction and training for second order
RBF network." In 2011 IEEE International
Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE
2011), 248-255. IEEE, 2011.
[9] Godbole, Aditi S., Kanishka Tyagi, and
Michael T. Manry. "Neural decision directed
segmentation of silicon defects." In The 2013
Networks (IJCNN), 1-8. IEEE, 2013.
[10] Tyagi, Kanishka, Nojun Kwak, and Michael
Manry. "Optimal Conjugate Gradient
algorithm for generalization of Linear
Discriminant Analysis based on L1 norm." In
International Conference on Pattern
Recognition, 2014.
[11] Cai, Xun, Kanishka Tyagi, and Michael
Manry. "An Efficient Conjugate Gradient
based Multiple Optimal Learning Factors
Algorithm of Multilayer Perceptron Neural
Network." In International Joint Conference
on Neural Networks, 2014.
[12] Cai, Xun, Kanishka Tyagi, Michael T. Manry,
Zhi Chen. "An efficient conjugate gradient
based learning algorithm for multiple optimal
learning factors of multilayer perceptron
neural network." In 2014 International Joint
Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN),
1093-1099. IEEE, 2014.
[13] Jeong, Il-Young, Kanishka Tyagi, and Kyogu
Lee. "MIREX 2013: AN EFFICIENT
PARADIGM FOR AUDIO TAG
CLASSIFICATION USING SPARSE
AUTOENCODER AND MULTI-KERNEL
SVM." 2013.
[14] Tyagi, Kanishka. "Second Order Training
Algorithms For Radial Basis Function Neural
Networks." Department of Electrical
Engineering, The University of Texas at
Arlington, 2012.
[15] Auddy, Soumitro Swapan, Kanishka Tyagi,
Son Nguyen, and Michael Manry.
"Discriminant vector transformations in neural
network classifiers." In 2016 International
Joint Conference on Neural Networks
(IJCNN), 1780-1786. IEEE, 2016.
[16] Nguyen, Son, Kanishka Tyagi, Parastoo
Kheirkhah, and Michael Manry. "Partially
affine invariant back propagation." In 2016
[17] Hao, Yilong, Kanishka Tyagi, Rohit Rawat,
and Michael Manry. "Second order design of
multiclass kernel machines." In 2016
[18] Kheirkhah, Parastoo, Kanishka Tyagi, Son
Nguyen, and Michael T. Manry. "Structural
adaptation for sparsely connected MLP using
Newton's method." In 2017 International Joint
Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN),
4467-4473. IEEE, 2017.
[19] Kumar, Nalin, Manuel Gerardo Garcia Jr., and
Kanishka Tyagi. "Material sorting using a
vision system." US Patent
US20180243800A1, 2018.
[20] Tyagi, Kanishka, and Michael Manry. "Multi-
step Training of a Generalized Linear
Classifier." Neural Processing Letters 50, no.
2 (2019): 1341-1360. Springer US.
[21] Tyagi, Kanishka. "Automated multistep
classifier sizing and training for deep learner."
The University of Texas at Arlington, 2018.
62

[22] Tyagi, Kanishka, Son Nguyen, Rohit Rawat,
and Michael Manry. "Second Order Training
and Sizing for the Multilayer Perceptron."
Neural Processing Letters (2019): 29-Jan.
Springer US.
[23] Tyagi, Kanishka, Rajat Jain, and H J Shiva
Prasad. "A Novel Neuron Model Approach to
Real Time Flood Forecasting." In
International Conference on Water and Flood
Management (ICWFM-2007), vol. 1, 405-412.
2007. ISBN: 984-300-003354-5.
[24] Cai, Xun, Zhi Chen, Kanishka Tyagi, Kuan
Yu, Ziqiang Li, and Bo Zhu. "Second Order
Newton’s Method for Training Radial Basis
Function Neural Networks." Journal of
Computer Research and Development 52, no.
7 (2015): 1477.
[25] Tyagi, Kanishka, and Kyogu Lee.
"Applications of Deep Learning Network on
Audio and Music Problems." IEEE
Computational Intelligence Society Walter
Karplus Summer Research Grant 2013, 2013.
[26] Cai, Xun, and Kanishka Tyagi. "MLP-
Approximation source code." IPNN Lab, UT
Arlington, Revised on 05, 2010.
[27] Tyagi, N., and S. Suresh. "Production of
Cellulose from Sugarcane Molasses Using
Gluconacetobacter Intermedius SNT-1:
Optimization & Characterization." Journal of
Cleaner Production 112 (2016): 71-80.
[28] Tyagi, N., S. Mathur, and D. Kumar.
"Electrocoagulation Process for Textile
Wastewater Treatment in Continuous Upflow
Reactor." NISCAIR-CSIR, India, 2014.
[29] Tyagi, N., and S. Suresh. "Isolation and
Characterization of Cellulose Producing
Bacterial Strain from Orange Pulp." Advanced
Materials Research 626 (2013): 475-479.
[30] Kumar, D., N. Tyagi, and A.B. Gupta.
"Sensitivity Analysis of Field Test Kits for
Rapid Assessment of Bacteriological Quality
of Water." Journal of Water Supply: Research
and Technology—AQUA 61, no. 5 (2012):
283-290.
"Management of Drinking Water Quality at
Malviya National Institute of Technology,
Jaipur-A Case Study." Nature, Environment
and Pollution Technology 10, no. 1 (2011):
155-158.
"Selective Action of Chlorine Disinfection on
Different Coliforms and Pathogens Present in
Secondary Treated Effluent of STP." In
Proceedings of the 2nd International
Conference on Environmental Science and
Development, IPCBEE, 2011.
[33] Karduri, Rajini K. R., and Dr. Christo Ananth.
"Decarbonizing the Grid: Pathways to
Sustainable Energy Storage." International
Journal of Advanced Research In Basic
Engineering Sciences and Technology
(IJARBEST), 2020.
"Lifecycle Assessment of Solar PV Systems:
From Manufacturing to Recycling."
International Journal of Advanced Research In
Basic Engineering Sciences and Technology
(IJARBEST), 2020.
"The Economics of Transitioning to
Renewable Energy Sources." International
(IJARBEST), 2020.
"Wind Energy Harvesting: Technological
Advances and Environmental Impacts."
(IJARBEST), 2020.
"Sustainable Urban Energy: Integrating Smart
Grids into Smart Cities." International Journal
of Advanced Research In Basic Engineering
Sciences and Technology (IJARBEST), 2020.
"The Role of Policy in Accelerating the
Energy Transition." International Journal of
Advanced Research In Basic Engineering
"Hydrogen Economy: Opportunities and
Challenges for a Sustainable Future."
63

(IJARBEST), 2020.
"Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage
(BECCS): Viability and Potential."
(IJARBEST), 2021.
"Energy Efficiency in Industrial Sectors:
Future Directions." International Journal of
Advanced Research In Basic Engineering
"The Impact of Electric Vehicles on Energy
Demand and Sustainability." International
(IJARBEST), 2021.
"Marine Energy Resources: Tapping into the
Power of Waves and Tides." International
(IJARBEST), 2021.
"Geothermal Energy: Untapped Potential for
Sustainable Development." International
(IJARBEST), 2021.
"The Nexus of Water and Energy: Strategies
for Co-Management and Sustainability."
(IJARBEST), 2021.
"Advancements in Photovoltaic Materials for
Sustainable Energy Generation." International
(IJARBEST), 2021.
64

Sustainable Energy Management: Reducing Waste with Lifecycle Thinking

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Similar to Sustainable Energy Management: Reducing Waste with Lifecycle Thinking

Similar to Sustainable Energy Management: Reducing Waste with Lifecycle Thinking (20)

More from Christo Ananth

More from Christo Ananth (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Sustainable Energy Management: Reducing Waste with Lifecycle Thinking