StribechCurve
A BRIEF OVERVIEW
History and Origin
 G.A. Hirn
 Thurston
 Beauchamp Tower
 Stribeck
 Gümbel Hersey
G.A. Hirn
 Hydrodynamic Lubrication was clearly studied by him and relation between
COF and Pressure was clearly stated.
 Speed relation was also done but not in a proper way
COF as V is doubled
V >> Load Carrying Capacity
Thurston
 Variation of COF by load (Contact Pressure) and Temp. Although Speed
factor was considered in study and data collected was put in the table form
and not as a graph.
 No information about the transition of HDL and BL although data when
plotted can be seen
Beauchamp Tower
 With increasing speed and load the friction from low to higher angular
velocities is going through a minimum
 He failed to give reason for low COF
Stribeck
 Performed several experiments to understand the effect of COF, V and
Pressure
 He also explained the regions of transition and divided his graph in
different Lubrication regimes
 To understand the Pressure, Load and velocity combined effect on FFL we can use the knowledge of Reynold’s Equation
Gümbel and Hersey
 They used Stribeck curve and plotted against a Dimensionless number .
Both of them worked separately and reached to same ν results.
ν N/P : P(Load per unit projected area)
 μ n/p : p(Pressure)
Fun Fact
 Adolf Martens, Director of the MPA had already published similar curve 17
years before Stribeck .
Detailed Study of Stribeck Curve
 A curve between coefficient of friction and bearing number
T ↑
ν ↓
μ ↓
T ↓
Mixed Lubrication System
Stribech curve

Stribech curve

  • 1.
  • 2.
    History and Origin G.A. Hirn  Thurston  Beauchamp Tower  Stribeck  Gümbel Hersey
  • 3.
    G.A. Hirn  HydrodynamicLubrication was clearly studied by him and relation between COF and Pressure was clearly stated.  Speed relation was also done but not in a proper way COF as V is doubled V >> Load Carrying Capacity
  • 4.
    Thurston  Variation ofCOF by load (Contact Pressure) and Temp. Although Speed factor was considered in study and data collected was put in the table form and not as a graph.  No information about the transition of HDL and BL although data when plotted can be seen
  • 6.
    Beauchamp Tower  Withincreasing speed and load the friction from low to higher angular velocities is going through a minimum  He failed to give reason for low COF
  • 7.
    Stribeck  Performed severalexperiments to understand the effect of COF, V and Pressure  He also explained the regions of transition and divided his graph in different Lubrication regimes  To understand the Pressure, Load and velocity combined effect on FFL we can use the knowledge of Reynold’s Equation
  • 9.
    Gümbel and Hersey They used Stribeck curve and plotted against a Dimensionless number . Both of them worked separately and reached to same ν results. ν N/P : P(Load per unit projected area)  μ n/p : p(Pressure)
  • 10.
    Fun Fact  AdolfMartens, Director of the MPA had already published similar curve 17 years before Stribeck .
  • 11.
    Detailed Study ofStribeck Curve  A curve between coefficient of friction and bearing number
  • 13.
    T ↑ ν ↓ μ↓ T ↓
  • 15.