Bruna Claro Pajaki completed an internship from May 18, 2015 to August 10, 2015 totaling 480 hours with the Crystallization and Particle Technology Systems Engineering group in the School of Chemical Engineering at Purdue University. She participated in a research project studying seeded cooling batch crystallization of needle-like crystals with an emphasis on crystal breakage. She was responsible for running experiments using lab-scale crystallizers and control software to study the breakage mechanism of high aspect ratio crystals by applying a factorial design with four factors each at two levels: volume, agitation, initial concentration, and impurity. Her experimental data made a useful contribution to the research.
The document discusses a company's forecasting challenges and opportunities for improvement. Several product lines have forecasting errors above the 20% goal. Asset utilization also varies between departments and machines, suggesting opportunities to better allocate resources. The consulting company helped the client improve planning processes, implement a 3-month rolling average to smooth forecasts, and optimize asset utilization, resulting in reduced errors and better resource allocation.
You want to improve your factory’s productivity: what’s next?Colt UK
The direct links between a comfortable work environment and productivity have been clearly shown by many studies. How do you know if you have a problem and what can you do?
This document summarizes a study on predictors of job performance among call center agents. It outlines the original proposal which involved administering surveys to 32 call center agents. However, the researchers encountered difficulties obtaining approval from companies. As a result, they revised their sampling method, scale, and data collection procedure. They now plan to conduct an online survey, meet agents face-to-face, or distribute survey kits. The revised timeline outlines administering a pre-test in early August and conducting the actual study from mid-August to late August with results submission at the end of August.
Fatina Chambers is a senior laboratory technologist seeking a position in a Fortune 500 company. She has over 10 years of experience working in clinical laboratories, including as a senior technologist at LabCorp of America. She is skilled in laboratory procedures, instrumentation, and ensuring compliance with regulations like OSHA. Currently, she is pursuing a Master's degree in Health Service Administration while performing various agricultural testing and research at Valley Proteins.
Bruna Claro Pajaki completed an internship from May 18, 2015 to August 10, 2015 totaling 480 hours with the Crystallization and Particle Technology Systems Engineering group in the School of Chemical Engineering at Purdue University. She participated in a research project studying seeded cooling batch crystallization of needle-like crystals with an emphasis on crystal breakage. She was responsible for running experiments using lab-scale crystallizers and control software to study the breakage mechanism of high aspect ratio crystals by applying a factorial design with four factors each at two levels: volume, agitation, initial concentration, and impurity. Her experimental data made a useful contribution to the research.
The document discusses a company's forecasting challenges and opportunities for improvement. Several product lines have forecasting errors above the 20% goal. Asset utilization also varies between departments and machines, suggesting opportunities to better allocate resources. The consulting company helped the client improve planning processes, implement a 3-month rolling average to smooth forecasts, and optimize asset utilization, resulting in reduced errors and better resource allocation.
You want to improve your factory’s productivity: what’s next?Colt UK
The direct links between a comfortable work environment and productivity have been clearly shown by many studies. How do you know if you have a problem and what can you do?
This document summarizes a study on predictors of job performance among call center agents. It outlines the original proposal which involved administering surveys to 32 call center agents. However, the researchers encountered difficulties obtaining approval from companies. As a result, they revised their sampling method, scale, and data collection procedure. They now plan to conduct an online survey, meet agents face-to-face, or distribute survey kits. The revised timeline outlines administering a pre-test in early August and conducting the actual study from mid-August to late August with results submission at the end of August.
Fatina Chambers is a senior laboratory technologist seeking a position in a Fortune 500 company. She has over 10 years of experience working in clinical laboratories, including as a senior technologist at LabCorp of America. She is skilled in laboratory procedures, instrumentation, and ensuring compliance with regulations like OSHA. Currently, she is pursuing a Master's degree in Health Service Administration while performing various agricultural testing and research at Valley Proteins.
The document discusses standard costing and variance analysis through two case studies:
Case A examines the effect of assumed standard labor levels at Harden Company. Management adopted a dual standard system using different standards for motivation and cost reporting.
Case B analyzes a $2,000 under-applied factory overhead variance at Strayer Company. The variance was likely due to unfavorable spending and idle capacity variances as production was below budgeted levels.
Chapter 9 Standard Costing A Managerial Control ToolYesica Adicondro
1. The document discusses standard costing and variances. It provides sample calculations for setting standards and analyzing variances.
2. Standard costs are set for direct materials, direct labor, and overhead. Variances are calculated between actual and standard amounts to identify areas for improvement.
3. Managers are responsible for investigating significant variances that they can control, such as labor efficiency or spending variances, to determine the cause and take corrective action if needed.
Standard Costs Variance Analysis and its impact on Managerial AccountingGhous2
This document covers standard costs and variance analysis in managerial accounting. It defines standard costs and how they are developed, and explains how to calculate variances for direct materials, direct labor, and manufacturing overhead. Variances indicate differences between actual and standard costs, and are investigated to identify potential problems. Favorable variances are not always good, and process improvements can lead to unfavorable variances. The document provides examples of calculating variances and their financial impact.
This document contains discussion questions and exercises related to Activity-Based Costing (ABC). Some key points:
- ABC traces costs to activities and then traces activities to cost objects, allowing for a more thorough cost traceability compared to traditional costing.
- Activities link products to costs, as activities consume resources and cause costs to be incurred. Traditional costing assumes output directly causes costs.
- For ABC to provide more accurate costs than traditional costing, a company must have a complex cost structure and diverse product line.
This document discusses activity-based costing and its advantages over traditional costing methods. It covers key concepts such as tracing overhead costs to activities and products using cost drivers, calculating activity and product unit costs, and addressing issues like product cost distortions that can occur when products consume overhead activities in different proportions. The document provides examples of calculating predetermined overhead rates and variances, and assigning costs using multiple cost drivers and activity rates. It explains how activity-based costing can provide more accurate product costing than traditional methods.
Standard costs are predetermined costs used for planning and controlling operations. They aid in establishing budgets, controlling costs, simplifying costing procedures, assigning inventory costs, and setting sales prices and contract bids. Standards represent costs that should be attained in a well-managed plant at normal capacity, making them suitable for setting sales prices. Standards are an integral part of job order and process costing systems but do not replace those systems. Activities selected for standards should be repetitive with measurable, uniform inputs and outputs. Normal or currently attainable standards are preferable to theoretical standards for motivation and budgeting as theoretical standards are not realistically attainable.
This document provides information about the ACCT 505 course from DeVry University, including an outline of topics covered each week, discussion questions, assignments such as case studies and quizzes, and purchasing links for course materials. Key topics covered include cost terms, job order and process costing systems, variable costing, budgeting, standards and variances, segment reporting, and capital budgeting. The document also provides a sample case study on a company called Top Switch Inc. that involves reconstructing cost and inventory records after property was destroyed by flooding.
This document describes how Maxtar Industries, a manufacturer of smoker/barbecue units, implemented activity-based absorption costing to more accurately assign overhead costs to its two product lines. Under the traditional approach using direct labor hours, unit costs were $71.60 for premium units and $53.70 for standard units. The new activity-based approach identified three overhead cost pools - supporting direct labor, setting up machines, and parts administration - and assigned costs based on different activity drivers. This resulted in unit costs of $78.56 for premium units and $51.96 for standard units, a more precise assignment of overhead.
The document presents information on traditional costing vs activity-based costing. It discusses how traditional costing allocates overhead using a single predetermined rate based on direct labor or machine hours. Activity-based costing allocates overhead to multiple cost pools and uses cost drivers to trace costs to products. The key differences between the two methods are discussed, such as traditional costing being more suitable for labor-intensive operations while ABC is more accurate for capital-intensive operations. Examples are provided to demonstrate calculating product costs using both traditional and activity-based costing methods.
For more classes visit
www.snaptutorial.com
B6021 Module 1 Assignment 3 Calculating Inventory
Finlon Upholstery Inc. uses a job-order costing system to accumulate manufacturing costs. The company's work-in-process on December 31, 2001, consisted of one job (no. 2077), which was carried on the year-end balance sheet at $156,800. There
B6021 Effective Communication / snaptutorial.comStokesCope30
For more classes visit
www.snaptutorial.com
B6021 Module 1 Assignment 3 Calculating Inventory
Finlon Upholstery Inc. uses a job-order costing system to accumulate manufacturing costs. The company's work-in-process on December 31, 2001, consisted of one job (no. 2077), which was carried on the year-end balance sheet at $156,800. There was no finished-goods inventory on this date.
For more course tutorials visit
www.tutorialrank.com
B6021 Module 1 Assignment 3 Calculating Inventory
Finlon Upholstery Inc. uses a job-order costing system to accumulate manufacturing costs. The company's work-in-process on December 31, 2001, consisted of one job (no. 2077), which was carried on the year-end balance sheet at $156,800. There was no finished-goods inventory on this date.
For more course tutorials visit
www.newtonhelp.com
B6021 Module 1 Assignment 3 Calculating Inventory
Finlon Upholstery Inc. uses a job-order costing system to accumulate manufacturing costs. The company's work-
For more course tutorials visit
www.tutorialrank.com
B6021 Module 1 Assignment 3 Calculating Inventory
Finlon Upholstery Inc. uses a job-order costing system to accumulate manufacturing costs. The company's work-in-process on December 31, 2001, consisted of one job (no. 2077), which was carried on the year-end balance sheet at $156,800. There was no finished-goods inventory on this date.
ACC 207 Final Project Memorandum to ManagementMaria L. Schir.docxnettletondevon
ACC 207 Final Project
Memorandum to Management
Maria L. Schiro-Evans
May 29, 2016
DATE: May 29, 2016
TO: Managers for the Bird Feeder Division
FROM: Maria Schiro-Evans, Cost Accountant
RE: Quantitative Analysis Results and Recommendations
Initial analysis:
An analysis of the Bird Feeder Division has been requested due to unanticipated budget variances. Budgeted number of units is 50,000 with $21.00 sales price and variable cost per unit of $15.56. The contribution margin is $5.44. The actual number of units was 47,000 with variable cost per unit of $17.47 and contribution margin of $3.63. The actual number of units was less but the contribution margin was lower than the budgeted one. The breakeven point is 33,272 units and that goal was achieved but 52,479 units was needed to make the profit goal of $10,000. Even though the breakeven point was surpassed, less units were made but cost more than budgeted for 50,000 units.
In creating and analyzing a Flexible Budget, it is clear that the original Static Budget was too conservative in its estimation of costs. Two of the variable direct costs that have large, negative variances are Direct Materials – Cedar and Direct Manufacturing Labor. The fact that less than budgeted units were made yet actual costs were more, especially for Cedar materials and direct labor, points to possible mistakes being made by labor personnel with the materials so more materials had to be used. The prices for the cedar materials could also have increased from their historical price, which management may have used in calculating the cost for the static budget or circumstances may have changed at the actual time of purchase in terms of discounts or volume. The Price Variance for the cedar materials was negative by $22,560, which makes sense when you take in account that more material than budgeted for was used in making the bird feeders. The cedar materials also had a negative efficiency variance of $14,100 which means more material per unit was used than was budgeted for and that materials were not used efficiently by personnel per unit. All three Direct Costs have negative efficiency variances with labor being the largest at $56,400. These negative efficiency variances possibly point to inexperienced personnel working on the manufacturing of the bird feeders that used more material than expected because of waste or mistakes and also needing more time to complete each bird feeder due to mistakes or problems. The fact that less bird feeders were produced only reinforces the idea that materials and labor were not used effectively in production.
The Units Sold Category has a negative and unfavorable Sales Volume variance due to only 47,000 units sold when 50,000 was the budgeted amount. This affected Revenues and Gross Margin negatively. Revenue was favorable when compared to the flexible budget but with most actual costs being more than the flexible budget cost.
For more classes visit
www.snaptutorial.com
B6021 Module 1 Assignment 3 Calculating Inventory
Finlon Upholstery Inc. uses a job-For more classes visit
www.snaptutorial.com
B6021 Module 1 Assignment 3 Calculating Inventory
Finlon Upholstery Inc. uses a job-
Activity-Based Costing
Allocates overhead to multiple activity cost pools, and Assigns the activity cost pools to products or services by means of cost drivers.
Complex manufacturing processes may require multiple allocation bases; this approach is called Activity-Based Costing
Activity-based costing (ABC) is a method of assigning overhead and indirect costs—such as salaries and utilities—to products and services. The ABC system of cost accounting is based on activities, which are considered any event, unit of work, or task with a specific goal.
The document discusses standard costing and variance analysis through two case studies:
Case A examines the effect of assumed standard labor levels at Harden Company. Management adopted a dual standard system using different standards for motivation and cost reporting.
Case B analyzes a $2,000 under-applied factory overhead variance at Strayer Company. The variance was likely due to unfavorable spending and idle capacity variances as production was below budgeted levels.
Chapter 9 Standard Costing A Managerial Control ToolYesica Adicondro
1. The document discusses standard costing and variances. It provides sample calculations for setting standards and analyzing variances.
2. Standard costs are set for direct materials, direct labor, and overhead. Variances are calculated between actual and standard amounts to identify areas for improvement.
3. Managers are responsible for investigating significant variances that they can control, such as labor efficiency or spending variances, to determine the cause and take corrective action if needed.
Standard Costs Variance Analysis and its impact on Managerial AccountingGhous2
This document covers standard costs and variance analysis in managerial accounting. It defines standard costs and how they are developed, and explains how to calculate variances for direct materials, direct labor, and manufacturing overhead. Variances indicate differences between actual and standard costs, and are investigated to identify potential problems. Favorable variances are not always good, and process improvements can lead to unfavorable variances. The document provides examples of calculating variances and their financial impact.
This document contains discussion questions and exercises related to Activity-Based Costing (ABC). Some key points:
- ABC traces costs to activities and then traces activities to cost objects, allowing for a more thorough cost traceability compared to traditional costing.
- Activities link products to costs, as activities consume resources and cause costs to be incurred. Traditional costing assumes output directly causes costs.
- For ABC to provide more accurate costs than traditional costing, a company must have a complex cost structure and diverse product line.
This document discusses activity-based costing and its advantages over traditional costing methods. It covers key concepts such as tracing overhead costs to activities and products using cost drivers, calculating activity and product unit costs, and addressing issues like product cost distortions that can occur when products consume overhead activities in different proportions. The document provides examples of calculating predetermined overhead rates and variances, and assigning costs using multiple cost drivers and activity rates. It explains how activity-based costing can provide more accurate product costing than traditional methods.
Standard costs are predetermined costs used for planning and controlling operations. They aid in establishing budgets, controlling costs, simplifying costing procedures, assigning inventory costs, and setting sales prices and contract bids. Standards represent costs that should be attained in a well-managed plant at normal capacity, making them suitable for setting sales prices. Standards are an integral part of job order and process costing systems but do not replace those systems. Activities selected for standards should be repetitive with measurable, uniform inputs and outputs. Normal or currently attainable standards are preferable to theoretical standards for motivation and budgeting as theoretical standards are not realistically attainable.
This document provides information about the ACCT 505 course from DeVry University, including an outline of topics covered each week, discussion questions, assignments such as case studies and quizzes, and purchasing links for course materials. Key topics covered include cost terms, job order and process costing systems, variable costing, budgeting, standards and variances, segment reporting, and capital budgeting. The document also provides a sample case study on a company called Top Switch Inc. that involves reconstructing cost and inventory records after property was destroyed by flooding.
This document describes how Maxtar Industries, a manufacturer of smoker/barbecue units, implemented activity-based absorption costing to more accurately assign overhead costs to its two product lines. Under the traditional approach using direct labor hours, unit costs were $71.60 for premium units and $53.70 for standard units. The new activity-based approach identified three overhead cost pools - supporting direct labor, setting up machines, and parts administration - and assigned costs based on different activity drivers. This resulted in unit costs of $78.56 for premium units and $51.96 for standard units, a more precise assignment of overhead.
The document presents information on traditional costing vs activity-based costing. It discusses how traditional costing allocates overhead using a single predetermined rate based on direct labor or machine hours. Activity-based costing allocates overhead to multiple cost pools and uses cost drivers to trace costs to products. The key differences between the two methods are discussed, such as traditional costing being more suitable for labor-intensive operations while ABC is more accurate for capital-intensive operations. Examples are provided to demonstrate calculating product costs using both traditional and activity-based costing methods.
For more classes visit
www.snaptutorial.com
B6021 Module 1 Assignment 3 Calculating Inventory
Finlon Upholstery Inc. uses a job-order costing system to accumulate manufacturing costs. The company's work-in-process on December 31, 2001, consisted of one job (no. 2077), which was carried on the year-end balance sheet at $156,800. There
B6021 Effective Communication / snaptutorial.comStokesCope30
For more classes visit
www.snaptutorial.com
B6021 Module 1 Assignment 3 Calculating Inventory
Finlon Upholstery Inc. uses a job-order costing system to accumulate manufacturing costs. The company's work-in-process on December 31, 2001, consisted of one job (no. 2077), which was carried on the year-end balance sheet at $156,800. There was no finished-goods inventory on this date.
For more course tutorials visit
www.tutorialrank.com
B6021 Module 1 Assignment 3 Calculating Inventory
Finlon Upholstery Inc. uses a job-order costing system to accumulate manufacturing costs. The company's work-in-process on December 31, 2001, consisted of one job (no. 2077), which was carried on the year-end balance sheet at $156,800. There was no finished-goods inventory on this date.
For more course tutorials visit
www.newtonhelp.com
B6021 Module 1 Assignment 3 Calculating Inventory
Finlon Upholstery Inc. uses a job-order costing system to accumulate manufacturing costs. The company's work-
For more course tutorials visit
www.tutorialrank.com
B6021 Module 1 Assignment 3 Calculating Inventory
Finlon Upholstery Inc. uses a job-order costing system to accumulate manufacturing costs. The company's work-in-process on December 31, 2001, consisted of one job (no. 2077), which was carried on the year-end balance sheet at $156,800. There was no finished-goods inventory on this date.
ACC 207 Final Project Memorandum to ManagementMaria L. Schir.docxnettletondevon
ACC 207 Final Project
Memorandum to Management
Maria L. Schiro-Evans
May 29, 2016
DATE: May 29, 2016
TO: Managers for the Bird Feeder Division
FROM: Maria Schiro-Evans, Cost Accountant
RE: Quantitative Analysis Results and Recommendations
Initial analysis:
An analysis of the Bird Feeder Division has been requested due to unanticipated budget variances. Budgeted number of units is 50,000 with $21.00 sales price and variable cost per unit of $15.56. The contribution margin is $5.44. The actual number of units was 47,000 with variable cost per unit of $17.47 and contribution margin of $3.63. The actual number of units was less but the contribution margin was lower than the budgeted one. The breakeven point is 33,272 units and that goal was achieved but 52,479 units was needed to make the profit goal of $10,000. Even though the breakeven point was surpassed, less units were made but cost more than budgeted for 50,000 units.
In creating and analyzing a Flexible Budget, it is clear that the original Static Budget was too conservative in its estimation of costs. Two of the variable direct costs that have large, negative variances are Direct Materials – Cedar and Direct Manufacturing Labor. The fact that less than budgeted units were made yet actual costs were more, especially for Cedar materials and direct labor, points to possible mistakes being made by labor personnel with the materials so more materials had to be used. The prices for the cedar materials could also have increased from their historical price, which management may have used in calculating the cost for the static budget or circumstances may have changed at the actual time of purchase in terms of discounts or volume. The Price Variance for the cedar materials was negative by $22,560, which makes sense when you take in account that more material than budgeted for was used in making the bird feeders. The cedar materials also had a negative efficiency variance of $14,100 which means more material per unit was used than was budgeted for and that materials were not used efficiently by personnel per unit. All three Direct Costs have negative efficiency variances with labor being the largest at $56,400. These negative efficiency variances possibly point to inexperienced personnel working on the manufacturing of the bird feeders that used more material than expected because of waste or mistakes and also needing more time to complete each bird feeder due to mistakes or problems. The fact that less bird feeders were produced only reinforces the idea that materials and labor were not used effectively in production.
The Units Sold Category has a negative and unfavorable Sales Volume variance due to only 47,000 units sold when 50,000 was the budgeted amount. This affected Revenues and Gross Margin negatively. Revenue was favorable when compared to the flexible budget but with most actual costs being more than the flexible budget cost.
For more classes visit
www.snaptutorial.com
B6021 Module 1 Assignment 3 Calculating Inventory
Finlon Upholstery Inc. uses a job-For more classes visit
www.snaptutorial.com
B6021 Module 1 Assignment 3 Calculating Inventory
Finlon Upholstery Inc. uses a job-
Activity-Based Costing
Allocates overhead to multiple activity cost pools, and Assigns the activity cost pools to products or services by means of cost drivers.
Complex manufacturing processes may require multiple allocation bases; this approach is called Activity-Based Costing
Activity-based costing (ABC) is a method of assigning overhead and indirect costs—such as salaries and utilities—to products and services. The ABC system of cost accounting is based on activities, which are considered any event, unit of work, or task with a specific goal.
mkt 571 new,uop mkt 571 new,uop mkt 571 new complete course,uop mkt 571 new entire course,mkt 571 final exam guide new 2018 new,uop mkt 571 new week 1,uop mkt 571 new week 2,uop mkt 571 new week 3,uop mkt 571 new week 4,uop mkt 571 new week 5,uop mkt 571 new week 6,uop mkt 571 new tutorials,mkt 571 new assignments,mkt 571 new help
ash ese 633 week 6 final paper,ash ese 633 week 6 dq 2 creating a collaborative school culture,ash ese 633 week 6 dq 1 course reflection discussion,ash ese 633 week 6,ese 633 week 6,ash ese 633,ese 633,ash ese 633 week 6 tutorial,ash ese 633 week 6 assignment,ash ese 633 week 6 help
Ese 633 week 6 dq 1 course reflection discussionolivergeorg
This document discusses creating a collaborative school culture through establishing shared goals and values, continuous learning, and collaborative relationships. It recommends evaluating the school's current performance, setting a long-term goal for improving culture, and establishing short-term objectives. Examples of factors that contribute to positive culture include shared purpose, norms of improvement, and collaborative relationships. The document instructs students to reflect on what they've learned and develop one long-term goal for their school culture along with four short-term objectives, and to explain how special education teams and administrators will contribute to the overall goal.
Str 581 week 4 individual capstone final exam part 2 newolivergeorg
This document contains a 10-question multiple choice exam on topics related to finance and accounting. The questions cover topics such as calculating net operating income, identifying types of mergers, evaluating compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, and calculating financial ratios. Correct answers are provided for each question.
it describes the bony anatomy including the femoral head , acetabulum, labrum . also discusses the capsule , ligaments . muscle that act on the hip joint and the range of motion are outlined. factors affecting hip joint stability and weight transmission through the joint are summarized.
Chapter wise All Notes of First year Basic Civil Engineering.pptxDenish Jangid
Chapter wise All Notes of First year Basic Civil Engineering
Syllabus
Chapter-1
Introduction to objective, scope and outcome the subject
Chapter 2
Introduction: Scope and Specialization of Civil Engineering, Role of civil Engineer in Society, Impact of infrastructural development on economy of country.
Chapter 3
Surveying: Object Principles & Types of Surveying; Site Plans, Plans & Maps; Scales & Unit of different Measurements.
Linear Measurements: Instruments used. Linear Measurement by Tape, Ranging out Survey Lines and overcoming Obstructions; Measurements on sloping ground; Tape corrections, conventional symbols. Angular Measurements: Instruments used; Introduction to Compass Surveying, Bearings and Longitude & Latitude of a Line, Introduction to total station.
Levelling: Instrument used Object of levelling, Methods of levelling in brief, and Contour maps.
Chapter 4
Buildings: Selection of site for Buildings, Layout of Building Plan, Types of buildings, Plinth area, carpet area, floor space index, Introduction to building byelaws, concept of sun light & ventilation. Components of Buildings & their functions, Basic concept of R.C.C., Introduction to types of foundation
Chapter 5
Transportation: Introduction to Transportation Engineering; Traffic and Road Safety: Types and Characteristics of Various Modes of Transportation; Various Road Traffic Signs, Causes of Accidents and Road Safety Measures.
Chapter 6
Environmental Engineering: Environmental Pollution, Environmental Acts and Regulations, Functional Concepts of Ecology, Basics of Species, Biodiversity, Ecosystem, Hydrological Cycle; Chemical Cycles: Carbon, Nitrogen & Phosphorus; Energy Flow in Ecosystems.
Water Pollution: Water Quality standards, Introduction to Treatment & Disposal of Waste Water. Reuse and Saving of Water, Rain Water Harvesting. Solid Waste Management: Classification of Solid Waste, Collection, Transportation and Disposal of Solid. Recycling of Solid Waste: Energy Recovery, Sanitary Landfill, On-Site Sanitation. Air & Noise Pollution: Primary and Secondary air pollutants, Harmful effects of Air Pollution, Control of Air Pollution. . Noise Pollution Harmful Effects of noise pollution, control of noise pollution, Global warming & Climate Change, Ozone depletion, Greenhouse effect
Text Books:
1. Palancharmy, Basic Civil Engineering, McGraw Hill publishers.
2. Satheesh Gopi, Basic Civil Engineering, Pearson Publishers.
3. Ketki Rangwala Dalal, Essentials of Civil Engineering, Charotar Publishing House.
4. BCP, Surveying volume 1
How to Make a Field Mandatory in Odoo 17Celine George
In Odoo, making a field required can be done through both Python code and XML views. When you set the required attribute to True in Python code, it makes the field required across all views where it's used. Conversely, when you set the required attribute in XML views, it makes the field required only in the context of that particular view.
How to Setup Warehouse & Location in Odoo 17 InventoryCeline George
In this slide, we'll explore how to set up warehouses and locations in Odoo 17 Inventory. This will help us manage our stock effectively, track inventory levels, and streamline warehouse operations.
This slide is special for master students (MIBS & MIFB) in UUM. Also useful for readers who are interested in the topic of contemporary Islamic banking.
This presentation was provided by Steph Pollock of The American Psychological Association’s Journals Program, and Damita Snow, of The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), for the initial session of NISO's 2024 Training Series "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape." Session One: 'Setting Expectations: a DEIA Primer,' was held June 6, 2024.
1. STAYER ACC 560 Week 8 Quiz 6 (Chapter 11) NEW
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
http://www.uopassignments.com/acc-560-strayer/acc-
560-week-8-quiz-6-recent
For more classes visit
http://www.uopassignments.com/
Question 1
If actual direct materials costs are greater than standard direct
materials costs, it means that
Question 2
The standard direct materials quantity does not include
allowances for
Question 3
Marburg Co. expects direct materials cost of $6 per unit for
100,000 units (a total of $600,000 of direct materials costs).
Marburg’s standard direct materials cost and budgeted direct
materials cost is
Question 4
2. If the labor quantity variance is unfavorable and the cause is
inefficient use of direct labor, the responsibility rests with the
Question 5
A managerial accountant
1. does not participate in the standard setting process.
2. provides knowledge of cost behaviors in the standard setting
process.
3. provides input of historical costs to the standard setting
process.
Question 6
Using standard costs
Question 7
An unfavorable materials quantity variance would occur if
Question 8
Hofburg’s standard quantities for 1 unit of product include 2
pounds of materials and 1.5 labor hours. The standard rates
are $2 per pound and $7 per hour. The standard overhead rate
is $8 per direct labor hour. The total standard cost of Hofburg’s
product is
Question 9
Scorpion Production Company planned to use 1 yard of plastic
per unit budgeted at $81 a yard. However, the plastic actually
cost $80 per yard. The company actually made 3,900 units,
although it had planned to make only 3,300 units. Total yards
used for production were 3,960. How much is the total
materials variance?
Question 10
Unfavorable materials price and quantity variances are