SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Stakeholder Survey Data
Knox, South Central, East, Tennessee Valley, &
Northwest regions
December 2013
Purpose of In Home Tennessee’s Stakeholder Survey
The In Home Tennessee stakeholder survey is designed to answer three research
questions:
1.Have key stakeholders been engaged in the service array process?
This is measured by self-identification and participation in the survey.
2. Do key stakeholders show increased engagement between the baseline (starting
point) and post-implementation (after In Home Tennessee has rolled out in the
region)?
This is measured by comparison of the self-reported frequency of collaboration with
other stakeholders and the type of collaboration between early and follow up data
collection.
3. Which elements of collaboration predict stakeholder engagement?
The elements being measured are foundation, quality, benefits, drawbacks, and
general satisfaction with the service array process.
Methodology
• Surveys are distributed in two intervals to providers and DCS staff who
attended the region’s service array meeting.
• The first interval is an early survey distributed after the first service array
meeting.
• The second interval is a follow up survey 6 months after In Home
Tennessee has been implemented in the region.
• The following charts show comparison results of early data and follow
up data for Knox, South Central, East, TN Valley ,and Northwest.
Key Stakeholders Participating in In Home Tennessee (IHT)
Knox , South Central, East, TN Valley, Northwest regions represented
N = 176
Domestic Violence
2%
Charitable Foundation
2%
Legal & Law
Enforcement
3%

Food Resource
2%
Other
8%

Faith
3%

Transportation
1%

Mental Health &
Substance Abuse
21%

Health
10%

Child Advocacy
10%
NonProfit Business
17%
Private Business
10%
Educator
11%

The key stakeholder chart is the overall average percentage of the key providers who
completed the In Home Tennessee Stakeholder Survey for the regions listed.
Average % of Collaborative Partnerships
Since Last IHT Service Array Meeting
Knox, South Central, East, TN Valley, Northwest regions represented
90%
85%
80%
79%
70%

60%
50%
40%
30%

68%
63%

59% 62%
61%
58%

58%
50%
46%

53%
53%
47%

46%
40%
43%
37%
34%

37%
35%

30%
29%

20%

23%
24% 24%18%
23%

Follow up
18%

18%
10%

Early

24%

10%
8%

11%
12%

9%

9%
6%

9%
4%

0%

This chart compares the percentage of stakeholders who completed the IIHT
Stakeholder Survey from the first service array meeting in a region (early) and 6
months after the meeting (follow up).
Elements of Collaboration
Knox, South Central, East, TN Valley, Northwest regions represented
5

4

3

Early
Follow up

2

1
Foundation

Quality

Benefits

Drawbacks

Satisfaction

This chart reflects that overall respondents are satisfied with IHT’s purpose and
continue to find value in IHT’s foundation and quality. Also, respondents agree that
benefits outweigh drawbacks from participating and continuing in the IHT service
array process.
Frequency of Collaboration
Knox, South Central, East, TN Valley, Northwest regions represented
1.46
1.5

Coordinate legislation, policies, regulations, or guidelines across agencies
Design a comprehensive integrated service delivery system

1.6

1.77
1.9
1.8

Implement a comprehensive integrated service delivery system

1.8
1.79

Plan and conduct joint trainings across agencies

2

Coordinate service delivery policies across agencies

2.1
2.27
2.22

Attend interagency trainings

2.22
2.38

Creat interagency agreements for addressing co-occuring issues

follow up

2.4
2.42

Conduct joint planning

Early

2.44
2.54

Use interagency teams

2.42
2.47

Implement joint service delivery

2.66
2.66

Jointly Coordinate programs or service delivery

2.6
2.62

Participate in the same workgroups or committees

3.05
3.12

Share information or data
1
Never

2
1 or 2X a Year

3
Monthly

4
2 or 3X a Month

5
Weekly or More

This chart reflects an increased frequency of more complex collaborations between
early and follow up data.
Summary of Findings
• Overall, the community and regional perception of In Home Tennessee remains
positive.
• Collaboration between providers and DCS is increasing as a result of the In Home
Tennessee service array process.
• Stakeholders and DCS staff continue to see value in the purpose of In Home
Tennessee and indicate that it will improve collaborative work with the children
and families for whom we provide in-home services.
Questions? Feedback?
For more information about In Home Tennessee
overall, please check out our website at
http://tn.gov/youth/childsafety/inhometn.shtml.
Or, for specific questions or feedback about the
information contained here, please email us at
EI-DCS.In-Home-TN@tn.gov.

More Related Content

Similar to Stakeholder Survey 2013 UPDATED

Integrated Development Performance Monitoring and Evaluation System in Indone...
Integrated Development Performance Monitoring and Evaluation System in Indone...Integrated Development Performance Monitoring and Evaluation System in Indone...
Integrated Development Performance Monitoring and Evaluation System in Indone...
Arief Wiroyudo
 
Diagnosing State Enrollment Systems: Just What the Doctor Ordered!
Diagnosing State Enrollment Systems: Just What the Doctor Ordered!Diagnosing State Enrollment Systems: Just What the Doctor Ordered!
Diagnosing State Enrollment Systems: Just What the Doctor Ordered!
NASHP HealthPolicy
 
Learning Contract PP M&PII
Learning Contract PP M&PIILearning Contract PP M&PII
Learning Contract PP M&PII
Sue Roh
 

Similar to Stakeholder Survey 2013 UPDATED (20)

(2014) Standards Implementation and Systems Change: Results of a Survey of On...
(2014) Standards Implementation and Systems Change: Results of a Survey of On...(2014) Standards Implementation and Systems Change: Results of a Survey of On...
(2014) Standards Implementation and Systems Change: Results of a Survey of On...
 
Policy Implementation (1).ppt
Policy Implementation (1).pptPolicy Implementation (1).ppt
Policy Implementation (1).ppt
 
RSSH Service Delivery Innovation (component 3 - HRH_QI)_AR.pptx
RSSH Service Delivery Innovation (component 3 - HRH_QI)_AR.pptxRSSH Service Delivery Innovation (component 3 - HRH_QI)_AR.pptx
RSSH Service Delivery Innovation (component 3 - HRH_QI)_AR.pptx
 
An Evaluation Guide for Community Engagement
An Evaluation Guide for Community EngagementAn Evaluation Guide for Community Engagement
An Evaluation Guide for Community Engagement
 
Ev dem evaluation guide and toolkit
Ev dem evaluation guide and toolkitEv dem evaluation guide and toolkit
Ev dem evaluation guide and toolkit
 
The challenges of implementing generic web and mobile apps for managing and m...
The challenges of implementing generic web and mobile apps for managing and m...The challenges of implementing generic web and mobile apps for managing and m...
The challenges of implementing generic web and mobile apps for managing and m...
 
Integrated Development Performance Monitoring and Evaluation System in Indone...
Integrated Development Performance Monitoring and Evaluation System in Indone...Integrated Development Performance Monitoring and Evaluation System in Indone...
Integrated Development Performance Monitoring and Evaluation System in Indone...
 
Survey of Early adopter steering committee members
Survey of Early adopter steering committee members Survey of Early adopter steering committee members
Survey of Early adopter steering committee members
 
Evaluating Systems Change
Evaluating Systems ChangeEvaluating Systems Change
Evaluating Systems Change
 
Paper Thesis From Yudo Devianto - Budi Luhur University
Paper Thesis From Yudo Devianto - Budi Luhur UniversityPaper Thesis From Yudo Devianto - Budi Luhur University
Paper Thesis From Yudo Devianto - Budi Luhur University
 
Community-wide Outcome Indicators
Community-wide Outcome IndicatorsCommunity-wide Outcome Indicators
Community-wide Outcome Indicators
 
Social Accountability for Improved Community Health Shanklin
Social Accountability for Improved Community Health ShanklinSocial Accountability for Improved Community Health Shanklin
Social Accountability for Improved Community Health Shanklin
 
Assessing and improving partnership relationships and outcomes a proposed fr...
Assessing and improving partnership relationships and outcomes  a proposed fr...Assessing and improving partnership relationships and outcomes  a proposed fr...
Assessing and improving partnership relationships and outcomes a proposed fr...
 
Measuring National M&E System Strengthening in Nigeria: Application of the Mo...
Measuring National M&E System Strengthening in Nigeria: Application of the Mo...Measuring National M&E System Strengthening in Nigeria: Application of the Mo...
Measuring National M&E System Strengthening in Nigeria: Application of the Mo...
 
One Voice Texas Member Survey 2014
One Voice Texas Member Survey 2014One Voice Texas Member Survey 2014
One Voice Texas Member Survey 2014
 
Diagnosing State Enrollment Systems: Just What the Doctor Ordered!
Diagnosing State Enrollment Systems: Just What the Doctor Ordered!Diagnosing State Enrollment Systems: Just What the Doctor Ordered!
Diagnosing State Enrollment Systems: Just What the Doctor Ordered!
 
(2014) From Provincial Standards to Program Improvement: EPION's Cross Sector...
(2014) From Provincial Standards to Program Improvement: EPION's Cross Sector...(2014) From Provincial Standards to Program Improvement: EPION's Cross Sector...
(2014) From Provincial Standards to Program Improvement: EPION's Cross Sector...
 
Bridging the hydropower policy implementation gap-bpig (mk11)
Bridging the hydropower policy implementation gap-bpig (mk11)Bridging the hydropower policy implementation gap-bpig (mk11)
Bridging the hydropower policy implementation gap-bpig (mk11)
 
Learning Contract PP M&PII
Learning Contract PP M&PIILearning Contract PP M&PII
Learning Contract PP M&PII
 
Assessing and Advancing Community Readiness for Multi-Sector Data Sharing
Assessing and Advancing Community Readiness for Multi-Sector Data SharingAssessing and Advancing Community Readiness for Multi-Sector Data Sharing
Assessing and Advancing Community Readiness for Multi-Sector Data Sharing
 

More from TN DCS

Customer Focused Government and Computer Security
Customer Focused Government and Computer SecurityCustomer Focused Government and Computer Security
Customer Focused Government and Computer Security
TN DCS
 
Applying for Positions at DCS
Applying for Positions at DCSApplying for Positions at DCS
Applying for Positions at DCS
TN DCS
 
Tn dcs cab pilot training 10 29 13
Tn dcs cab pilot training 10 29 13Tn dcs cab pilot training 10 29 13
Tn dcs cab pilot training 10 29 13
TN DCS
 

More from TN DCS (9)

Working with Children Who Have Diabetes
Working with Children Who Have DiabetesWorking with Children Who Have Diabetes
Working with Children Who Have Diabetes
 
Child Development
Child DevelopmentChild Development
Child Development
 
Revised Foster Parent Training 1.24.17
Revised Foster Parent Training 1.24.17 Revised Foster Parent Training 1.24.17
Revised Foster Parent Training 1.24.17
 
2016 Permanency Planning Enhancements
2016 Permanency Planning Enhancements2016 Permanency Planning Enhancements
2016 Permanency Planning Enhancements
 
Customer Focused Government and Computer Security
Customer Focused Government and Computer SecurityCustomer Focused Government and Computer Security
Customer Focused Government and Computer Security
 
Pregnant women and substance abuse treatment in Tennessee
Pregnant women and substance abuse treatment in TennesseePregnant women and substance abuse treatment in Tennessee
Pregnant women and substance abuse treatment in Tennessee
 
Applying for Positions at DCS
Applying for Positions at DCSApplying for Positions at DCS
Applying for Positions at DCS
 
DCS Budget Presentation Deck for House Civil Justice Committee
DCS Budget Presentation Deck for House Civil Justice CommitteeDCS Budget Presentation Deck for House Civil Justice Committee
DCS Budget Presentation Deck for House Civil Justice Committee
 
Tn dcs cab pilot training 10 29 13
Tn dcs cab pilot training 10 29 13Tn dcs cab pilot training 10 29 13
Tn dcs cab pilot training 10 29 13
 

Recently uploaded

Additional Benefits for Employee Website.pdf
Additional Benefits for Employee Website.pdfAdditional Benefits for Employee Website.pdf
Additional Benefits for Employee Website.pdf
joachimlavalley1
 

Recently uploaded (20)

How to Break the cycle of negative Thoughts
How to Break the cycle of negative ThoughtsHow to Break the cycle of negative Thoughts
How to Break the cycle of negative Thoughts
 
The Art Pastor's Guide to Sabbath | Steve Thomason
The Art Pastor's Guide to Sabbath | Steve ThomasonThe Art Pastor's Guide to Sabbath | Steve Thomason
The Art Pastor's Guide to Sabbath | Steve Thomason
 
Jose-Rizal-and-Philippine-Nationalism-National-Symbol-2.pptx
Jose-Rizal-and-Philippine-Nationalism-National-Symbol-2.pptxJose-Rizal-and-Philippine-Nationalism-National-Symbol-2.pptx
Jose-Rizal-and-Philippine-Nationalism-National-Symbol-2.pptx
 
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official PublicationThe Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
 
TESDA TM1 REVIEWER FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...
TESDA TM1 REVIEWER  FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...TESDA TM1 REVIEWER  FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...
TESDA TM1 REVIEWER FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...
 
Cambridge International AS A Level Biology Coursebook - EBook (MaryFosbery J...
Cambridge International AS  A Level Biology Coursebook - EBook (MaryFosbery J...Cambridge International AS  A Level Biology Coursebook - EBook (MaryFosbery J...
Cambridge International AS A Level Biology Coursebook - EBook (MaryFosbery J...
 
How to Split Bills in the Odoo 17 POS Module
How to Split Bills in the Odoo 17 POS ModuleHow to Split Bills in the Odoo 17 POS Module
How to Split Bills in the Odoo 17 POS Module
 
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptx
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptxInstructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptx
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptx
 
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdf
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfUnit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdf
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdf
 
NLC-2024-Orientation-for-RO-SDO (1).pptx
NLC-2024-Orientation-for-RO-SDO (1).pptxNLC-2024-Orientation-for-RO-SDO (1).pptx
NLC-2024-Orientation-for-RO-SDO (1).pptx
 
Sectors of the Indian Economy - Class 10 Study Notes pdf
Sectors of the Indian Economy - Class 10 Study Notes pdfSectors of the Indian Economy - Class 10 Study Notes pdf
Sectors of the Indian Economy - Class 10 Study Notes pdf
 
Solid waste management & Types of Basic civil Engineering notes by DJ Sir.pptx
Solid waste management & Types of Basic civil Engineering notes by DJ Sir.pptxSolid waste management & Types of Basic civil Engineering notes by DJ Sir.pptx
Solid waste management & Types of Basic civil Engineering notes by DJ Sir.pptx
 
The geography of Taylor Swift - some ideas
The geography of Taylor Swift - some ideasThe geography of Taylor Swift - some ideas
The geography of Taylor Swift - some ideas
 
special B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdf
special B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdfspecial B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdf
special B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdf
 
Supporting (UKRI) OA monographs at Salford.pptx
Supporting (UKRI) OA monographs at Salford.pptxSupporting (UKRI) OA monographs at Salford.pptx
Supporting (UKRI) OA monographs at Salford.pptx
 
Template Jadual Bertugas Kelas (Boleh Edit)
Template Jadual Bertugas Kelas (Boleh Edit)Template Jadual Bertugas Kelas (Boleh Edit)
Template Jadual Bertugas Kelas (Boleh Edit)
 
Additional Benefits for Employee Website.pdf
Additional Benefits for Employee Website.pdfAdditional Benefits for Employee Website.pdf
Additional Benefits for Employee Website.pdf
 
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...
 
Chapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptx
Chapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptxChapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptx
Chapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptx
 
Unit 2- Research Aptitude (UGC NET Paper I).pdf
Unit 2- Research Aptitude (UGC NET Paper I).pdfUnit 2- Research Aptitude (UGC NET Paper I).pdf
Unit 2- Research Aptitude (UGC NET Paper I).pdf
 

Stakeholder Survey 2013 UPDATED

  • 1. Stakeholder Survey Data Knox, South Central, East, Tennessee Valley, & Northwest regions December 2013
  • 2. Purpose of In Home Tennessee’s Stakeholder Survey The In Home Tennessee stakeholder survey is designed to answer three research questions: 1.Have key stakeholders been engaged in the service array process? This is measured by self-identification and participation in the survey. 2. Do key stakeholders show increased engagement between the baseline (starting point) and post-implementation (after In Home Tennessee has rolled out in the region)? This is measured by comparison of the self-reported frequency of collaboration with other stakeholders and the type of collaboration between early and follow up data collection. 3. Which elements of collaboration predict stakeholder engagement? The elements being measured are foundation, quality, benefits, drawbacks, and general satisfaction with the service array process.
  • 3. Methodology • Surveys are distributed in two intervals to providers and DCS staff who attended the region’s service array meeting. • The first interval is an early survey distributed after the first service array meeting. • The second interval is a follow up survey 6 months after In Home Tennessee has been implemented in the region. • The following charts show comparison results of early data and follow up data for Knox, South Central, East, TN Valley ,and Northwest.
  • 4. Key Stakeholders Participating in In Home Tennessee (IHT) Knox , South Central, East, TN Valley, Northwest regions represented N = 176 Domestic Violence 2% Charitable Foundation 2% Legal & Law Enforcement 3% Food Resource 2% Other 8% Faith 3% Transportation 1% Mental Health & Substance Abuse 21% Health 10% Child Advocacy 10% NonProfit Business 17% Private Business 10% Educator 11% The key stakeholder chart is the overall average percentage of the key providers who completed the In Home Tennessee Stakeholder Survey for the regions listed.
  • 5. Average % of Collaborative Partnerships Since Last IHT Service Array Meeting Knox, South Central, East, TN Valley, Northwest regions represented 90% 85% 80% 79% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 68% 63% 59% 62% 61% 58% 58% 50% 46% 53% 53% 47% 46% 40% 43% 37% 34% 37% 35% 30% 29% 20% 23% 24% 24%18% 23% Follow up 18% 18% 10% Early 24% 10% 8% 11% 12% 9% 9% 6% 9% 4% 0% This chart compares the percentage of stakeholders who completed the IIHT Stakeholder Survey from the first service array meeting in a region (early) and 6 months after the meeting (follow up).
  • 6. Elements of Collaboration Knox, South Central, East, TN Valley, Northwest regions represented 5 4 3 Early Follow up 2 1 Foundation Quality Benefits Drawbacks Satisfaction This chart reflects that overall respondents are satisfied with IHT’s purpose and continue to find value in IHT’s foundation and quality. Also, respondents agree that benefits outweigh drawbacks from participating and continuing in the IHT service array process.
  • 7. Frequency of Collaboration Knox, South Central, East, TN Valley, Northwest regions represented 1.46 1.5 Coordinate legislation, policies, regulations, or guidelines across agencies Design a comprehensive integrated service delivery system 1.6 1.77 1.9 1.8 Implement a comprehensive integrated service delivery system 1.8 1.79 Plan and conduct joint trainings across agencies 2 Coordinate service delivery policies across agencies 2.1 2.27 2.22 Attend interagency trainings 2.22 2.38 Creat interagency agreements for addressing co-occuring issues follow up 2.4 2.42 Conduct joint planning Early 2.44 2.54 Use interagency teams 2.42 2.47 Implement joint service delivery 2.66 2.66 Jointly Coordinate programs or service delivery 2.6 2.62 Participate in the same workgroups or committees 3.05 3.12 Share information or data 1 Never 2 1 or 2X a Year 3 Monthly 4 2 or 3X a Month 5 Weekly or More This chart reflects an increased frequency of more complex collaborations between early and follow up data.
  • 8. Summary of Findings • Overall, the community and regional perception of In Home Tennessee remains positive. • Collaboration between providers and DCS is increasing as a result of the In Home Tennessee service array process. • Stakeholders and DCS staff continue to see value in the purpose of In Home Tennessee and indicate that it will improve collaborative work with the children and families for whom we provide in-home services.
  • 9. Questions? Feedback? For more information about In Home Tennessee overall, please check out our website at http://tn.gov/youth/childsafety/inhometn.shtml. Or, for specific questions or feedback about the information contained here, please email us at EI-DCS.In-Home-TN@tn.gov.

Editor's Notes

  1. Have key stakeholders been engaged in the service array process? This is measured by self-identification and participation in a survey.The key stakeholder chart is the overall average percentage of the key providers who completed the In Home Tennessee Stakeholder Survey for the regions listed. The chart reflects that most providers represent nonprofit business and mental health and substance abuse service agencies. Although domestic violence services, and legal/law enforcement agencies appear to represent significantly low this could be a reflection of the fact that there is typically only one or two of these types of agencies in each region, which in turn, would have fewer people to respond to the survey. It appears there is more opportunity to increase collaboration with private businesses, health, and school systems.
  2. This chart is an expansion of the first research question and compares the percentage of all stakeholders who have completed the In Home Tennessee Stakeholder Survey from the first service array meeting in a region (early) and 6 months after the meeting (follow up). The stakeholder survey is distributed to the community providers who attended the service array meeting in each region. In addition, the survey is distributed to the DCS regional staff. This chart reflects a high percentage of DCS employees completed the survey as compared to the different types of providers. This may be due to DCS being a larger agency with more employees responding to the survey as compared to other, smaller agencies. In addition, this chart reflects the overall percentage of collaborations increased, with 16 of 19 partner types between early data collection and follow up data collection.
  3. Which elements of collaboration predict stakeholder engagement? The elements being measured are foundation, quality, benefits, drawbacks, and general satisfaction with the service array process. This chart reflects that overall respondents are satisfied with In Home Tennessee’s purpose and continue to find value in In Home Tennessee’s foundation and quality. In addition, respondents agree that the benefits outweigh any drawbacks from participating and continuing in the In Home Tennessee service array process.
  4. Do key stakeholders show increased engagement between baseline (the starting point) and post-implementation of In Home Tennessee? This is measured by comparison of self-reported frequency of collaboration with other stakeholders and type of collaboration betweenearly and follow up data collection. This chart reflects that DCS collaborates with the community most frequently through sharing information or data, participating in workgroups or committees, and coordinating programs and service delivery. This chart reflects an increased frequency of more complex collaborations between early and follow up data.