Outcomes Based Contracting resource - logic model and Results Based Accountability framework. Taken from the draft Partnering in Procurement Document developed by the Western Australian Council of Social Service and WA Health
(Kakayahang Pragmatik at Istratedyik) GROUP 4.pptxAshleyFajardo5
Mahalaga ang di verbal na komunikasyon sapagkat inilalantad nito ang emosyon ng nagsasalita at kinakausap, nililinaw nito ang kahulugan ng mensahe, at pinananatili nito ang resiprokal na inter-aksiyon ng tagapagpadala at tagatanggap ng mensahe.
Mahalaga ang di verbal na komunikasyon sapagkat inilalantad nito ang emosyon ng nagsasalita at kinakausap, nililinaw nito ang kahulugan ng mensahe, at pinananatili nito ang resiprokal na inter-aksiyon ng tagapagpadala at tagatanggap ng mensahe.
Kung ang isang tao ay may kakayahang pragmatik natutukoy nito ang kahulugan ng mensaheng sinasabi at di sinasabi, batay sa ikinikilos ng taong kausap.
Natutukoy rin nito ang kaugnayan ng mga salita sa kanilang kahulugan, batay sa paggamit at sa konteksto.
Sa pakikipagtalastasan, mahalagang maunawaan ang intensiyon ng nagsasalita dahil mahuhulaan ang mensahe nito ng tagapakinig.
Mahalaga ang kakayahang pragmatiko bilang daan sa pagiging epektibo ng pakikipagtalastasan, sapagkat nililinaw nito ang relasyon sa pagitan ng intensiyon ng nagsasalita o nagpapahatid ng mensahe at ang kahulugan nito.
Nararapat ding malámang may iba't ibang salik pang dapat isaalang-alang sa pag-unawa, kasama na rito ang intelektuwal na kalagayan ng decoder, kalinawan ng encoder
Impact practice in the third sector for public health practitionersCatherine A. Greaves
Sharing Impact Practice (outcomes measurement) from third sector (community & voluntary sector) wellbeing projects for public health mental health & alcohol interventions
Chapter 1 Evaluation and Social Work Making the ConnectionP.docxzebadiahsummers
Chapter 1 Evaluation and Social Work: Making the Connection
Page 4
Let’s begin by considering three important questions: 1. Is evaluation an important area of social work? 2. Is the evaluator role an important one for social workers? 3. How can evaluations help improve or enhance social work interventions? These questions may be your questions as you begin to read this book. They are questions that many social work students and practitioners have pondered. This book is about evaluation so the responses to the first two questions, in brief, will be no surprise to you. Yes, evaluation is an important area of social work. Further, the evaluator role is an important role for every social worker to prepare to assume. Some social workers will be evaluators of programs, and virtually every social worker will be an evaluator of their own practice. It’s like asking whether social workers need to know whether they are doing a good job, or asking them if they know whether their interventions are effective in helping their clients. The third question, asking how evaluation can help improve social work interventions, is the focus of this text.
The underlying theme driving the book is that evaluation is a vital element of any social work approach and is critical for ensuring that social work actually does work! A reassuring theme is that evaluation is a practice area that BSW and MSW students and practitioners alike can learn. Social workers and students wanting to maximize their impact in their jobs will find that the perspective, knowledge, ethics, and skills of evaluations covered in this book are a central component of practice and ensure that you will have a much greater impact on your clients’ well-being. This book provides the needed preparation for evaluation in both a comprehensive and a readable format. The primary emphasis is on the various kinds of small and mid-range formative evaluations that are often implemented at the local agency level; less emphasis is placed on the large, com-plex national and regional studies that may draw the most coverage under the title evaluation. These smaller formative evaluations are also the critical ones that social work students and graduates either are assigned or should consider taking on in their field placements and employment agencies. Such
Page 5
evaluations often are instrumental in determining whether the programs in which you are working will continue and possibly expand. Example of a Small, Formative Evaluation An agency that provides an anger management program to perpetrators of domestic violence offers a series of ten psychoeducational group sessions to help them manage their anger. The agency also conducts an evaluation of this program that is integral to it. An anger management scale is used to measure changes that occur in the participants’ anger after they have completed all ten sessions of a group program. Throughout the series, the specific items of the anger management scale (e.g., be.
The responsibility of the board of directors of a nonprofit is not simply to fund raise or review financials, but rather to ensure that the money raised is used well. To create impact.
(Kakayahang Pragmatik at Istratedyik) GROUP 4.pptxAshleyFajardo5
Mahalaga ang di verbal na komunikasyon sapagkat inilalantad nito ang emosyon ng nagsasalita at kinakausap, nililinaw nito ang kahulugan ng mensahe, at pinananatili nito ang resiprokal na inter-aksiyon ng tagapagpadala at tagatanggap ng mensahe.
Mahalaga ang di verbal na komunikasyon sapagkat inilalantad nito ang emosyon ng nagsasalita at kinakausap, nililinaw nito ang kahulugan ng mensahe, at pinananatili nito ang resiprokal na inter-aksiyon ng tagapagpadala at tagatanggap ng mensahe.
Kung ang isang tao ay may kakayahang pragmatik natutukoy nito ang kahulugan ng mensaheng sinasabi at di sinasabi, batay sa ikinikilos ng taong kausap.
Natutukoy rin nito ang kaugnayan ng mga salita sa kanilang kahulugan, batay sa paggamit at sa konteksto.
Sa pakikipagtalastasan, mahalagang maunawaan ang intensiyon ng nagsasalita dahil mahuhulaan ang mensahe nito ng tagapakinig.
Mahalaga ang kakayahang pragmatiko bilang daan sa pagiging epektibo ng pakikipagtalastasan, sapagkat nililinaw nito ang relasyon sa pagitan ng intensiyon ng nagsasalita o nagpapahatid ng mensahe at ang kahulugan nito.
Nararapat ding malámang may iba't ibang salik pang dapat isaalang-alang sa pag-unawa, kasama na rito ang intelektuwal na kalagayan ng decoder, kalinawan ng encoder
Impact practice in the third sector for public health practitionersCatherine A. Greaves
Sharing Impact Practice (outcomes measurement) from third sector (community & voluntary sector) wellbeing projects for public health mental health & alcohol interventions
Chapter 1 Evaluation and Social Work Making the ConnectionP.docxzebadiahsummers
Chapter 1 Evaluation and Social Work: Making the Connection
Page 4
Let’s begin by considering three important questions: 1. Is evaluation an important area of social work? 2. Is the evaluator role an important one for social workers? 3. How can evaluations help improve or enhance social work interventions? These questions may be your questions as you begin to read this book. They are questions that many social work students and practitioners have pondered. This book is about evaluation so the responses to the first two questions, in brief, will be no surprise to you. Yes, evaluation is an important area of social work. Further, the evaluator role is an important role for every social worker to prepare to assume. Some social workers will be evaluators of programs, and virtually every social worker will be an evaluator of their own practice. It’s like asking whether social workers need to know whether they are doing a good job, or asking them if they know whether their interventions are effective in helping their clients. The third question, asking how evaluation can help improve social work interventions, is the focus of this text.
The underlying theme driving the book is that evaluation is a vital element of any social work approach and is critical for ensuring that social work actually does work! A reassuring theme is that evaluation is a practice area that BSW and MSW students and practitioners alike can learn. Social workers and students wanting to maximize their impact in their jobs will find that the perspective, knowledge, ethics, and skills of evaluations covered in this book are a central component of practice and ensure that you will have a much greater impact on your clients’ well-being. This book provides the needed preparation for evaluation in both a comprehensive and a readable format. The primary emphasis is on the various kinds of small and mid-range formative evaluations that are often implemented at the local agency level; less emphasis is placed on the large, com-plex national and regional studies that may draw the most coverage under the title evaluation. These smaller formative evaluations are also the critical ones that social work students and graduates either are assigned or should consider taking on in their field placements and employment agencies. Such
Page 5
evaluations often are instrumental in determining whether the programs in which you are working will continue and possibly expand. Example of a Small, Formative Evaluation An agency that provides an anger management program to perpetrators of domestic violence offers a series of ten psychoeducational group sessions to help them manage their anger. The agency also conducts an evaluation of this program that is integral to it. An anger management scale is used to measure changes that occur in the participants’ anger after they have completed all ten sessions of a group program. Throughout the series, the specific items of the anger management scale (e.g., be.
The responsibility of the board of directors of a nonprofit is not simply to fund raise or review financials, but rather to ensure that the money raised is used well. To create impact.
CHAPTER SIXTEENUnderstanding Context Evaluation and MeasuremeJinElias52
CHAPTER SIXTEEN
Understanding Context: Evaluation and Measurement in Not-for-Profit Sectors
Dale C. Brandenburg
Many individuals associated with community agencies, health care, public workforce development, and similar not-for-profit organizations view program evaluation akin to a visit to the dentist’s office. It’s painful, but at some point it cannot be avoided. A major reason for this perspective is that evaluation is seen as taking money away from program activities that perform good for others, that is, intruding on valuable resources that are intended for delivering the “real” services of the organization (Kopczynski & Pritchard, 2004). A major reason for this logic is that since there are limited funds available to serve the public good, why must a portion of program delivery be allocated to something other than serving people in need? This is not an unreasonable point and one that program managers in not-for-profits face on a continuing basis.
The focus of evaluation in not-for-profit organization has shifted in recent years from administrative data to outcome measurement, impact evaluation, and sustainability (Aspen Institute, 2000), thus a shift from short-term to long-term effects of interventions. Evaluators in the not-for-profit sector view their world as the combination of technical knowledge, communication skills, and political savvy that can make or break the utility and value of the program under consideration. Evaluation in not-for-profit settings tends to value the importance of teamwork, collaboration, and generally working together. This chapter is meant to provide a glimpse at a minor portion of the evaluation efforts that take place in the not-for-profit sector. It excludes, for example, the efforts in public education, but does provide some context for workforce development efforts.
CONTRAST OF CONTEXTS
Evaluation in not-for-profit settings tends to have different criteria for the judgment of its worth than is typically found in corporate and similar settings. Such criteria are likely to include the following:
How useful is the evaluation?
Is the evaluation feasible and practical?
Does the evaluation hold high ethical principles?
Does the evaluation measure the right things, and is it accurate?
Using criteria such as the above seems a far cry from concepts of return on investment that are of vital importance in the profit sector. Even the cause of transfer of training can sometimes be of secondary importance to assuring that the program is described accurately. Another difference is the pressure of time. Programs offered by not-for-profit organizations, such as an alcohol recovery program, take a long time to see the effects and, by the time results are viewable, the organization has moved on to the next program. Instead we often see that evaluation is relegated to measuring the countable, the numbers of people who have completed the program, rather than the life-changing impact that decreased alcohol abuse has on ...
Performance Management for Nonprofits: Simplifying and Maximizing Organizati...Community IT Innovators
Get introduced to the tools necessary to optimize your organization’s current data, enabling you to turn data into information to tell the story of the organization’s impact in a powerful way. Contact Karen Finn of Results Leadership Group and/or Katherine Mowers of Community IT Innovators to explore how you can simplify and maximize your organization's impact data.
This presentation includes:
1. An overview of Results-based Accountability and an approach for identifying impact performance measures (activity during workshop session);
2. Where to start to assess your current organizational data and business systems in light of these performance measures;
3. An introduction to a process for reviewing software and determining a system that will be most useful to the organization’s operations.
4. An overview of software options used to support performance management, demonstrate impact and help to strategically plan for improvements.
We are happy to have a conversation about where you are at - and where you want to go - with your performance management and nonprofit business systems.
1INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS2 1 Aggression and Violence.docxfelicidaddinwoodie
1
INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS
2
1: Aggression and Violence
Aggression is, “an act or behavior that intentionally hurts another person, either physically or psychologically” (Matsumoto & Juang, 2008, p. 389). While some expressions of aggression are universal, cross-cultural differences exist in the type and level of aggression that are considered to be legally or socially sanctioned. There have been multiple reasons proposed by theorists to explain these cultural differences in the type (verbal, physical, etc.) and level of aggression expressed across cultures.
For this Discussion,review this week’s Learning Resources. Select a culture and consider how this culture expresses aggression.
With these thoughts in mind:
a brief description of the culture you selected. Provide an example of a behavior that may be perceived as aggressive by culture you selected and explain why. Then, provide an example of a behavior that may be perceived as aggressive across most cultures and explain why. Finally explain how socially sanctioned violence is acceptable within certain cultures. Support your responses using the Learning Resources and the current literature.
.
Reference:
Matsumoto, D., & Juang, L. (2008). Culture and psychology (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.
2: Attribution
“Not only do people bolster beliefs in their ability to control in response to successful control of an event but also they hold an unwarranted belief that they can control chance events,” states Yamaguchi (Matsumoto (Ed.), 2001, pp. 226–227) in the course text. While members of all cultures have the goal of protecting self-image following failures, differences exist among cultures in terms of the attributions made for the failure and success of a task. Thus, while the self-serving bias is universally applied, the specific attributions made differ cross-culturally. In some cultures, it is assumed that failure is attributable to situational factors while others assume dispositional factors.
Differences also exist in how the failure or success of another individual is attributed. Consider the relevance of attributions for success and failure for the scholar-practitioner working in a multicultural environment or in a global company. How would knowledge of how individuals’ attribute their own or others failure impact a team, classroom, or organization?
For this Discussion, imagine that a group of business people from two different cultures (one from a collectivistic culture and another from an individualistic culture) work together on a business project, and at the end, the project fails. Consider how people from individualistic and collectivistic cultures respond to failure and the factors to which they would most likely attribute their failures.
With these thoughts in mind:
a brief comparison of the similarities and differences of attribution styles in individualistic and collectivistic cultures. Then provide an example of a group situation in which a proj ...
A process server is a authorized person for delivering legal documents, such as summons, complaints, subpoenas, and other court papers, to peoples involved in legal proceedings.
Jennifer Schaus and Associates hosts a complimentary webinar series on The FAR in 2024. Join the webinars on Wednesdays and Fridays at noon, eastern.
Recordings are on YouTube and the company website.
https://www.youtube.com/@jenniferschaus/videos
Presentation by Jared Jageler, David Adler, Noelia Duchovny, and Evan Herrnstadt, analysts in CBO’s Microeconomic Studies and Health Analysis Divisions, at the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists Summer Conference.
Russian anarchist and anti-war movement in the third year of full-scale warAntti Rautiainen
Anarchist group ANA Regensburg hosted my online-presentation on 16th of May 2024, in which I discussed tactics of anti-war activism in Russia, and reasons why the anti-war movement has not been able to make an impact to change the course of events yet. Cases of anarchists repressed for anti-war activities are presented, as well as strategies of support for political prisoners, and modest successes in supporting their struggles.
Thumbnail picture is by MediaZona, you may read their report on anti-war arson attacks in Russia here: https://en.zona.media/article/2022/10/13/burn-map
Links:
Autonomous Action
http://Avtonom.org
Anarchist Black Cross Moscow
http://Avtonom.org/abc
Solidarity Zone
https://t.me/solidarity_zone
Memorial
https://memopzk.org/, https://t.me/pzk_memorial
OVD-Info
https://en.ovdinfo.org/antiwar-ovd-info-guide
RosUznik
https://rosuznik.org/
Uznik Online
http://uznikonline.tilda.ws/
Russian Reader
https://therussianreader.com/
ABC Irkutsk
https://abc38.noblogs.org/
Send mail to prisoners from abroad:
http://Prisonmail.online
YouTube: https://youtu.be/c5nSOdU48O8
Spotify: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/libertarianlifecoach/episodes/Russian-anarchist-and-anti-war-movement-in-the-third-year-of-full-scale-war-e2k8ai4
Many ways to support street children.pptxSERUDS INDIA
By raising awareness, providing support, advocating for change, and offering assistance to children in need, individuals can play a crucial role in improving the lives of street children and helping them realize their full potential
Donate Us
https://serudsindia.org/how-individuals-can-support-street-children-in-india/
#donatefororphan, #donateforhomelesschildren, #childeducation, #ngochildeducation, #donateforeducation, #donationforchildeducation, #sponsorforpoorchild, #sponsororphanage #sponsororphanchild, #donation, #education, #charity, #educationforchild, #seruds, #kurnool, #joyhome
Jennifer Schaus and Associates hosts a complimentary webinar series on The FAR in 2024. Join the webinars on Wednesdays and Fridays at noon, eastern.
Recordings are on YouTube and the company website.
https://www.youtube.com/@jenniferschaus/videos
What is the point of small housing associations.pptxPaul Smith
Given the small scale of housing associations and their relative high cost per home what is the point of them and how do we justify their continued existance
What is the point of small housing associations.pptx
Program Logic
1. Defining and Measuring
Outcomes
Getting Clear on the Basics
Adapted from the Outcomes Based
Contracting Guideline of the Health
Partnership Council project
2. Contracting Language
The first step in defining outcomes is to understand the commonly used terms:
Term Definition as developed from the Health Partnership Council Project in 2014
Inputs Financial, human and material resources used to deliver a service
Outputs The direct services, activities or intervention provided
Output Indicator A measure to quantify the services provided e.g. number of workshops run
Service Outcomes A change that occurs as a direct result of the service. This is likely to be a short to medium
term change; usually a change in skills, knowledge, behaviour, actions or attitudes
Outcome Indicator Information collected to monitor progress towards achievement of an outcome, often
expressed as a percentage
Community Outcomes Benefits for specific groups of people in the community that come about through changes in
the community itself – changes in status or life conditions for organizations, systems,
neighbourhoods, and networks
Impacts The significant, long-term, sustained effect of an activity on the fabric of the community and
well-being of the individuals and families and/or community
3. Program Logic Basics
The Program Logic model diagram below is a commonly used framework that shows a
logical flow from the situation you are trying to address through to the outcome you are
trying to achieve. This framework is also know as Theory of Change and maps the
Contracting Language definitions into a logical flow.
4. Program Logic Basics
To develop a Program Logic
Model, a simple process of
asking “So what?” in relation to
an activity will progressively get
to the heart of the outcome
you are trying to achieve. As
you can see from this example
below, each "so what?"
question digs deeper - from
output (what you do) to
outcome (the difference you
make). It also progresses from
the service outcome, which is
typically short term and related
to the service you provide, to
the community level outcome
which will be supported by a
range of factors beyond your
service.
5. Mapping Program Logic to
Contracting Language
The So What? questions can be mapped onto a Program Logic grid as per below. The Child Health Nurse is
an input, the Output is both the Mother's Group and who attends.
The Service Outcome is a short term outcome directly connected with the service, and the Community
Outcome is a longer term outcome your mothers may experience – it is important to note that a range of
factors outside your service will have support this community outcome.
7. Measuring Outcomes
Outcome measurement is a key tool for evaluation, and ensures that key aspects of
programs can be accurately measured. Evaluation of outcomes enables lessons to
be learnt, strengths to be built upon, and for future planning and policies to be
properly informed.
For some CSOs, measuring outcomes is a new process which requires thought and
planning. How outcomes are evaluated and measured need to be discussed and
agreed WA Health and the CSO at the service agreement planning stage.
Continuing with the mother’s group example, see the next 2 slides for possible
service outcomes indicators, and how to measure them.
8. Measuring Outcomes
Service Outcome Indicator Some options for collecting
this information
1. New mothers feel
connected to people who
share their experience
% increase of women who
report being more connected
with other mothers
On an intake form, ask women a question
such as:
“How much do you agree with this
statement” I feel connected with
other new mothers”
Strongly Disagree/
Disagree/Neutral/Agree/Strongly
Agree
At the end of the program, on the
evaluation form, ask the same question:
“How much do you agree with this
statement” I feel connected with
other new mothers”
Strongly Disagree/
Disagree/Neutral/Agree/Strongly
Agree
9. Measuring Outcomes
Service Outcome Indicator Some options for collecting
this information
1. New mothers report
feeling confident in their
new role as a mother
% increase of women who
report being more confident
after the group
Utilise a pre-post intake form, asking
women a question such as:
“How confident do you feel as a new
mother”
Very Under-confident/ Somewhat
Under-confident /Neutral/Somewhat
Confident/ Very Confident
Six months after the group, contact
group members by phone for a
response to the question “Looking
back, how much do you agree with
the statement that attending the
group has had a lasting impact on
your confidence as a parent?
Strongly Agree/ Agree
/Neutral/Disagree/Strongly
Disagree.
10. Who is responsible for what?
When working with WA government agencies, it is important to note how the
responsibilities are divided both in how inputs, outputs and outcomes are
determined, and who is responsible for achieving them:
Inputs Outputs Output
Indicators
Service
Outcome
Service
Outcome
Indicator
Community
Outcome
Who is responsible for determining these?
Community
Both CSOs and
Service
Government
Organisations
(Negotiable)
(CSOs)
Both CSOs and
Government
(Negotiable)
Both CSOs and
Government
(Negotiable)
Both CSOs and
Government
(Negotiable)
Government
in consultation
with CSO and
consumers/
carers
Who is responsible for achieving these?
Community
Service
Organisations
(CSO
CSOs CSOs CSO CSO Government
11. Over to you
Ideally a Program Logic process is undertaken with staff and Board input
to support an organisation articulating what they do and why.
Allow at least half a day and executive staff and Board members, as well
as consumers and carers if appropriate.
There are many online resources for undertaking this such as;
http://www.uwex.edu/ces/pdande/evaluation/evallogicmodel.html
Check the WACOSS Measuring Outcomes project web page for updates
on our project which helps navigate through the many tools available.