Source types
•Download as PPTX, PDF•
0 likes•28 views
This document provides guidance on evaluating academic sources and determining if they are peer-reviewed. It outlines two ways to check if a journal is peer-reviewed using Ulrichsweb or a publication's website. Conference articles may contain more current information than journal articles but are typically not reviewed to the same extent. Other sources like books, theses, dissertations, reports and patents are generally not considered peer-reviewed but can still contain relevant information.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Recommended
Evaluate sources
This document provides guidance on evaluating different types of sources and determining if they are peer-reviewed. It recommends using Ulrichsweb or checking a publication's website to see if a journal is peer-reviewed. Conference articles may contain timely information but are typically not peer-reviewed. Books, theses, dissertations, reports and patents are generally not considered peer-reviewed but can still contain relevant information.
Types of sources
There are several types of sources that can provide information, with peer-reviewed journals being the most authoritative due to a rigorous review process either by checking Ulrichsweb or a publication's website for details on peer review. Conference articles and proceedings typically are not peer reviewed but may contain timely information. Other sources like books, theses, dissertations, reports and patents generally are not peer reviewed but can still have relevant information.
Types of sources
There are several types of sources that can provide information, with peer-reviewed journals being the most authoritative due to a rigorous review process either through an online database or publication website. Conference articles are typically not reviewed to the same degree as journals but can contain more recent findings, while books, theses, reports and patents are not usually peer-reviewed but may still offer relevant information.
Peer reviewed journals 2013
This document discusses peer-reviewed journals and how to identify them. It explains that peer-reviewed or refereed journals have articles that are reviewed by both an editor and experts in the field before being published. This ensures accuracy and that the research meets academic standards. The document provides several ways to determine if a journal is peer-reviewed, including checking the journal itself for review boards or publication details, the journal publisher's website for submission guidelines mentioning review, or using the Ulrich's database to identify peer-reviewed titles. Narrowing searches to peer-reviewed sources ensures findings meet scholarly quality standards.
Call for the papers
IJESC journal meets the requirements on how to publish your research paper in international journals. This journal will make you easier to publish your article more quickly.
Best practices for presentation of e journals part 1
The document discusses developing best practice guidelines for the online presentation of journal titles and title histories. It notes that libraries currently treat changed journal titles as separate records, but online some content providers present backfiles and archives under the current title for simplicity. This can cause linking problems when the citation title and displayed title do not match. The document proposes creating guidelines that address libraries' and users' needs while also being reasonable for publishers, with input from various stakeholders in the discussion.
Getting published – how the library can help
This document provides guidance on publishing research papers and books. It discusses selecting an appropriate journal based on scope, quality, peer review process, and discoverability. It covers ensuring papers are published in reputable journals that are not predatory. The document also provides tips on style and format, managing publication timelines, dealing with publication charges, complying with open access policies, and avoiding plagiarism.
Proteomics & Geneomics
Journal of Proteomics & Geneomics (JPG) is an instructional journal providing a chance to researchers and scientists to explore the advanced and latest research developments within the field of Proteomics and Geneomics. Journal of Proteomics & Geneomics publishes the best quality scientific articles amalgamating broad vary of fields together with the fields associated with Proteomics & Geneomics.
Recommended
Evaluate sources
This document provides guidance on evaluating different types of sources and determining if they are peer-reviewed. It recommends using Ulrichsweb or checking a publication's website to see if a journal is peer-reviewed. Conference articles may contain timely information but are typically not peer-reviewed. Books, theses, dissertations, reports and patents are generally not considered peer-reviewed but can still contain relevant information.
Types of sources
There are several types of sources that can provide information, with peer-reviewed journals being the most authoritative due to a rigorous review process either by checking Ulrichsweb or a publication's website for details on peer review. Conference articles and proceedings typically are not peer reviewed but may contain timely information. Other sources like books, theses, dissertations, reports and patents generally are not peer reviewed but can still have relevant information.
Types of sources
There are several types of sources that can provide information, with peer-reviewed journals being the most authoritative due to a rigorous review process either through an online database or publication website. Conference articles are typically not reviewed to the same degree as journals but can contain more recent findings, while books, theses, reports and patents are not usually peer-reviewed but may still offer relevant information.
Peer reviewed journals 2013
This document discusses peer-reviewed journals and how to identify them. It explains that peer-reviewed or refereed journals have articles that are reviewed by both an editor and experts in the field before being published. This ensures accuracy and that the research meets academic standards. The document provides several ways to determine if a journal is peer-reviewed, including checking the journal itself for review boards or publication details, the journal publisher's website for submission guidelines mentioning review, or using the Ulrich's database to identify peer-reviewed titles. Narrowing searches to peer-reviewed sources ensures findings meet scholarly quality standards.
Call for the papers
IJESC journal meets the requirements on how to publish your research paper in international journals. This journal will make you easier to publish your article more quickly.
Best practices for presentation of e journals part 1
The document discusses developing best practice guidelines for the online presentation of journal titles and title histories. It notes that libraries currently treat changed journal titles as separate records, but online some content providers present backfiles and archives under the current title for simplicity. This can cause linking problems when the citation title and displayed title do not match. The document proposes creating guidelines that address libraries' and users' needs while also being reasonable for publishers, with input from various stakeholders in the discussion.
Getting published – how the library can help
This document provides guidance on publishing research papers and books. It discusses selecting an appropriate journal based on scope, quality, peer review process, and discoverability. It covers ensuring papers are published in reputable journals that are not predatory. The document also provides tips on style and format, managing publication timelines, dealing with publication charges, complying with open access policies, and avoiding plagiarism.
Proteomics & Geneomics
Journal of Proteomics & Geneomics (JPG) is an instructional journal providing a chance to researchers and scientists to explore the advanced and latest research developments within the field of Proteomics and Geneomics. Journal of Proteomics & Geneomics publishes the best quality scientific articles amalgamating broad vary of fields together with the fields associated with Proteomics & Geneomics.
Best practices for presentation of e journals part 2
The document outlines recommended best practices for e-journal publishers and providers to ensure e-journal content remains discoverable, citable, and accessible over time. It discusses the scope of the guidance, provides examples of recommendations around journal title and citation information, and outlines next steps like a public review period before publication on the NISO website. Publishers, libraries, and other interested parties are encouraged to get involved.
Open Access Overview
This document discusses open access literature and its importance. Open access literature refers to digital content that is available online for free without restrictions. It is important because subscription costs for scholarly journals continue rising each year, limiting access. While research is funded by taxpayers and students, they must then pay high costs to access published results. Open access addresses this by removing barriers to access. It benefits students, researchers and libraries by providing free scholarly content. The document outlines how librarians and faculty can promote open access through publishing in and advocating for open access journals and repositories.
Open access full (april 2013) web 2
Introduction to Open Access (Post Finch Report). Part 1 of a series of short 2-3 minute presentations
Selecting a Journal: Potential Criteria to Review
A presentation on criteria to review when selecting a journal for publishing a biomedical research manuscript
DNP Project Journal Selection Review Criteria
This document provides criteria for selecting a journal to publish in, including scope, editorial boards, peer review process, time to publication, indexing, access model (subscription or open access), and potential publication costs. The scope and "author guidelines" describe what types of manuscripts are accepted. Editorial boards oversee the journal's focus and quality. Peer review provides feedback to improve manuscripts. Indexing ensures the journal is discoverable. Publication costs, if any, should be considered during selection.
Dealing With Citing Wikipedia
These slides are part of a course lecture and are uploaded as a reminder for students working on project.
uKwazi Library Search Engine 2020
This presentation provides information on how to access and use the UWC Library search engine called uKwazi. It covers how to access the online tutorial for uKwazi, how to access library resources off-campus, and how to perform a basic literature search on uKwazi. It then describes the citation and reference options available, allowing users to generate references in their preferred style.
Journal club intro
This document provides an introduction to journal clubs, including their history and purpose. It discusses that journal clubs were first established in the 19th century as a way for medical professionals to regularly meet and critically evaluate recent academic literature. The goals of journal clubs are to review research, stay up to date on new knowledge, understand the research process, engage in critical analysis, discuss implications, and advocate for evidence-based practice. Guidance is provided on starting a journal club and critiquing research articles.
How to find a right journal to publish your article
The document provides guidance on finding the right journal to publish an article. It lists several resources to search for journals, including Ulrichsweb, DOAJ, Journal Citation Reports, SJR, IngentaConnect, and Elsevier Journal Finder. The document recommends selecting a journal by looking at reference lists, getting advice, considering the intended readership, reviewing papers from shortlisted journals, ranking choices, and discussing with co-authors. Key criteria for journal selection include the refereeing system, impact factor, circulation, reputation of editors, and ownership model.
St James Barnet 3&4 Nov 2017
This document provides guidance on conducting effective research for an Extended Project Qualification (EPQ). It emphasizes the importance of evaluating and selecting high-quality, relevant sources. It encourages a critical approach to research by having students assess sources based on the author and authority, type of source, publication details, timeliness, and purpose. Students are instructed to apply these skills by analyzing different sources using a worksheet. Key aspects of good research highlighted are using reliable authorities, demonstrating critical analysis, and keeping detailed records of the search process.
Uk Vietnam Partnership March 2019
This document provides information about resources available for research at UK Vietnam Higher Education Partnership, including the Middlesex University library search, subject guides, databases, standards, and referencing support. It details several databases relevant for computing, maths, engineering and science research like IEEE Xplore, ACM Digital Library, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, and Web of Science. Web of Science allows citation searching and journal impact analysis. The document also provides tips on managing references and budget information for library databases and collections.
Arguments for Open Access
The document discusses arguments for and against open access publishing. Supporters argue that self-archiving models are available when funds run out for paid models, and that increased visibility and citation rates result from open access. Reputable open access publishers and journals exist, and contents are indexed in directories. Peer review still occurs and does not ensure quality alone. Permissions allow commercial use which can benefit all. Legal concerns still apply but open access makes plagiarism easier to detect. Opponents counter that fully funding author-pays models may not be possible or fair, and that high impact journals are not always compliant. Reputation and findability could decrease but directories help visibility. They also argue quality may decline without peer review and
Surbiton High School April 2018
This document summarizes a workshop on research skills for an Extended Project Qualification (EPQ). The workshop covers how to become a critical searcher by evaluating sources based on their author, type, context, currency and purpose. It discusses searching, recording and referencing information as well as streamlining searches. The document provides resources on academic writing, databases, newspapers and support contacts for EPQ research.
CNUDST Workshops - web of science
Web of Science is a discovery platform that allows researchers to find essential information for their work, identify influential recent papers and citations between publications, and discover key researchers and appropriate journals and conferences. It covers over 60,000 journals from trustworthy sources, with the core collection including 12,500 high-quality journals that represent 80% of publications and 92% of cited papers. Web of Science provides powerful search and analysis tools to help researchers advance their work and personal brands.
Call for paper journals
The document announces a call for papers for the International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Technology (IJAET) for its upcoming Volume 6, Issue 3. IJAET invites researchers and scholars worldwide to submit original, high-quality research papers on topics related to engineering and technology. Submitted papers will undergo a rigorous peer-review process to ensure relevance, readability and originality. Accepted papers will be published in a timely manner.
Call for paper submission
IJAET is inviting fresh submissions for its forthcoming issue, Volume 6, Issue 3. Authors are encouraged to contribute their original research to the journal by submitting their research papers that comes under any of following category: research findings, projects, literature surveys, review works, case studies, short communications of high quality, theoretical or empirical research articles, book reviews, proposals, analysis, tutorials, editorials as well as pedagogical and curricular issues that describe significant advances in field of Engineering and Technology.
Call for papers engineering
IJAET is inviting fresh submissions for its forthcoming issue, Volume 6, Issue 3. Authors are encouraged to contribute their original research to the journal by submitting their research papers that comes under any of following category: research findings, projects, literature surveys, review works, case studies, short communications of high quality, theoretical or empirical research articles, book reviews, proposals, analysis, tutorials, editorials as well as pedagogical and curricular issues that describe significant advances in field of Engineering and Technology.
Call for papers engg
IJAET is inviting fresh submissions for its forthcoming issue, Volume 6, Issue 3. Authors are encouraged to contribute their original research to the journal by submitting their research papers that comes under any of following category: research findings, projects, literature surveys, review works, case studies, short communications of high quality, theoretical or empirical research articles, book reviews, proposals, analysis, tutorials, editorials as well as pedagogical and curricular issues that describe significant advances in field of Engineering and Technology.
Call for paper engineering
IJAET is inviting fresh submissions for its forthcoming issue, Volume 6, Issue 3. Authors are encouraged to contribute their original research to the journal by submitting their research papers that comes under any of following category: research findings, projects, literature surveys, review works, case studies, short communications of high quality, theoretical or empirical research articles, book reviews, proposals, analysis, tutorials, editorials as well as pedagogical and curricular issues that describe significant advances in field of Engineering and Technology.
Database selection science
This slideshow is part of a Decision-based Learning module for Information Literacy. The information is not intended to stand on its own.
Types of sources
Peer-reviewed journals can be identified by searching Ulrichsweb or checking the publication's website for information about their peer review process. Conference articles found in proceedings may contain more current information than journal articles but are typically not reviewed to the same extent. Other sources like books, theses, dissertations, reports and patents can be identified from their search record but are generally not considered peer-reviewed.
Getting Published: Tips and Resources
In which journal should I publish my paper? What is an impact factor? How can I promote my research? Can I publish my thesis? What is peer review? This presentation provides an insight into publishing for the Research Higher Degree student or any undergraduate student who wants to publish their research.
More Related Content
What's hot
Best practices for presentation of e journals part 2
The document outlines recommended best practices for e-journal publishers and providers to ensure e-journal content remains discoverable, citable, and accessible over time. It discusses the scope of the guidance, provides examples of recommendations around journal title and citation information, and outlines next steps like a public review period before publication on the NISO website. Publishers, libraries, and other interested parties are encouraged to get involved.
Open Access Overview
This document discusses open access literature and its importance. Open access literature refers to digital content that is available online for free without restrictions. It is important because subscription costs for scholarly journals continue rising each year, limiting access. While research is funded by taxpayers and students, they must then pay high costs to access published results. Open access addresses this by removing barriers to access. It benefits students, researchers and libraries by providing free scholarly content. The document outlines how librarians and faculty can promote open access through publishing in and advocating for open access journals and repositories.
Open access full (april 2013) web 2
Introduction to Open Access (Post Finch Report). Part 1 of a series of short 2-3 minute presentations
Selecting a Journal: Potential Criteria to Review
A presentation on criteria to review when selecting a journal for publishing a biomedical research manuscript
DNP Project Journal Selection Review Criteria
This document provides criteria for selecting a journal to publish in, including scope, editorial boards, peer review process, time to publication, indexing, access model (subscription or open access), and potential publication costs. The scope and "author guidelines" describe what types of manuscripts are accepted. Editorial boards oversee the journal's focus and quality. Peer review provides feedback to improve manuscripts. Indexing ensures the journal is discoverable. Publication costs, if any, should be considered during selection.
Dealing With Citing Wikipedia
These slides are part of a course lecture and are uploaded as a reminder for students working on project.
uKwazi Library Search Engine 2020
This presentation provides information on how to access and use the UWC Library search engine called uKwazi. It covers how to access the online tutorial for uKwazi, how to access library resources off-campus, and how to perform a basic literature search on uKwazi. It then describes the citation and reference options available, allowing users to generate references in their preferred style.
Journal club intro
This document provides an introduction to journal clubs, including their history and purpose. It discusses that journal clubs were first established in the 19th century as a way for medical professionals to regularly meet and critically evaluate recent academic literature. The goals of journal clubs are to review research, stay up to date on new knowledge, understand the research process, engage in critical analysis, discuss implications, and advocate for evidence-based practice. Guidance is provided on starting a journal club and critiquing research articles.
How to find a right journal to publish your article
The document provides guidance on finding the right journal to publish an article. It lists several resources to search for journals, including Ulrichsweb, DOAJ, Journal Citation Reports, SJR, IngentaConnect, and Elsevier Journal Finder. The document recommends selecting a journal by looking at reference lists, getting advice, considering the intended readership, reviewing papers from shortlisted journals, ranking choices, and discussing with co-authors. Key criteria for journal selection include the refereeing system, impact factor, circulation, reputation of editors, and ownership model.
St James Barnet 3&4 Nov 2017
This document provides guidance on conducting effective research for an Extended Project Qualification (EPQ). It emphasizes the importance of evaluating and selecting high-quality, relevant sources. It encourages a critical approach to research by having students assess sources based on the author and authority, type of source, publication details, timeliness, and purpose. Students are instructed to apply these skills by analyzing different sources using a worksheet. Key aspects of good research highlighted are using reliable authorities, demonstrating critical analysis, and keeping detailed records of the search process.
Uk Vietnam Partnership March 2019
This document provides information about resources available for research at UK Vietnam Higher Education Partnership, including the Middlesex University library search, subject guides, databases, standards, and referencing support. It details several databases relevant for computing, maths, engineering and science research like IEEE Xplore, ACM Digital Library, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, and Web of Science. Web of Science allows citation searching and journal impact analysis. The document also provides tips on managing references and budget information for library databases and collections.
Arguments for Open Access
The document discusses arguments for and against open access publishing. Supporters argue that self-archiving models are available when funds run out for paid models, and that increased visibility and citation rates result from open access. Reputable open access publishers and journals exist, and contents are indexed in directories. Peer review still occurs and does not ensure quality alone. Permissions allow commercial use which can benefit all. Legal concerns still apply but open access makes plagiarism easier to detect. Opponents counter that fully funding author-pays models may not be possible or fair, and that high impact journals are not always compliant. Reputation and findability could decrease but directories help visibility. They also argue quality may decline without peer review and
Surbiton High School April 2018
This document summarizes a workshop on research skills for an Extended Project Qualification (EPQ). The workshop covers how to become a critical searcher by evaluating sources based on their author, type, context, currency and purpose. It discusses searching, recording and referencing information as well as streamlining searches. The document provides resources on academic writing, databases, newspapers and support contacts for EPQ research.
CNUDST Workshops - web of science
Web of Science is a discovery platform that allows researchers to find essential information for their work, identify influential recent papers and citations between publications, and discover key researchers and appropriate journals and conferences. It covers over 60,000 journals from trustworthy sources, with the core collection including 12,500 high-quality journals that represent 80% of publications and 92% of cited papers. Web of Science provides powerful search and analysis tools to help researchers advance their work and personal brands.
Call for paper journals
The document announces a call for papers for the International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Technology (IJAET) for its upcoming Volume 6, Issue 3. IJAET invites researchers and scholars worldwide to submit original, high-quality research papers on topics related to engineering and technology. Submitted papers will undergo a rigorous peer-review process to ensure relevance, readability and originality. Accepted papers will be published in a timely manner.
Call for paper submission
IJAET is inviting fresh submissions for its forthcoming issue, Volume 6, Issue 3. Authors are encouraged to contribute their original research to the journal by submitting their research papers that comes under any of following category: research findings, projects, literature surveys, review works, case studies, short communications of high quality, theoretical or empirical research articles, book reviews, proposals, analysis, tutorials, editorials as well as pedagogical and curricular issues that describe significant advances in field of Engineering and Technology.
Call for papers engineering
IJAET is inviting fresh submissions for its forthcoming issue, Volume 6, Issue 3. Authors are encouraged to contribute their original research to the journal by submitting their research papers that comes under any of following category: research findings, projects, literature surveys, review works, case studies, short communications of high quality, theoretical or empirical research articles, book reviews, proposals, analysis, tutorials, editorials as well as pedagogical and curricular issues that describe significant advances in field of Engineering and Technology.
Call for papers engg
IJAET is inviting fresh submissions for its forthcoming issue, Volume 6, Issue 3. Authors are encouraged to contribute their original research to the journal by submitting their research papers that comes under any of following category: research findings, projects, literature surveys, review works, case studies, short communications of high quality, theoretical or empirical research articles, book reviews, proposals, analysis, tutorials, editorials as well as pedagogical and curricular issues that describe significant advances in field of Engineering and Technology.
Call for paper engineering
IJAET is inviting fresh submissions for its forthcoming issue, Volume 6, Issue 3. Authors are encouraged to contribute their original research to the journal by submitting their research papers that comes under any of following category: research findings, projects, literature surveys, review works, case studies, short communications of high quality, theoretical or empirical research articles, book reviews, proposals, analysis, tutorials, editorials as well as pedagogical and curricular issues that describe significant advances in field of Engineering and Technology.
Database selection science
This slideshow is part of a Decision-based Learning module for Information Literacy. The information is not intended to stand on its own.
What's hot (20)
Best practices for presentation of e journals part 2
Best practices for presentation of e journals part 2
How to find a right journal to publish your article
How to find a right journal to publish your article
Similar to Source types
Types of sources
Peer-reviewed journals can be identified by searching Ulrichsweb or checking the publication's website for information about their peer review process. Conference articles found in proceedings may contain more current information than journal articles but are typically not reviewed to the same extent. Other sources like books, theses, dissertations, reports and patents can be identified from their search record but are generally not considered peer-reviewed.
Getting Published: Tips and Resources
In which journal should I publish my paper? What is an impact factor? How can I promote my research? Can I publish my thesis? What is peer review? This presentation provides an insight into publishing for the Research Higher Degree student or any undergraduate student who wants to publish their research.
the critical literature research review.pptx
The document discusses the process of conducting a critical literature review. It explains that the literature review aims to narrow the research problem, develop a clear problem statement, and position the research relative to existing knowledge. The literature review process involves identifying published and unpublished work, evaluating this work in relation to the problem, and documenting sources. Key sources for the literature review include textbooks, journals, theses, conference proceedings, reports, newspapers, and the internet. The document provides guidance on searching for literature, evaluating sources, and documenting the literature review to avoid misrepresenting others' work and engaging in plagiarism.
Corp3400 econ3530 ente3532 2015
This document provides guidance on conducting a literature review, including defining what a literature review is, identifying key sources of information, developing search strategies, and assessing source quality. It discusses searching academic databases and catalogs for books and journal articles, as well as searching other sources like magazines, newspapers, and the internet. The document emphasizes planning search strategies, using subject specific keywords and databases, and citing references in a literature review.
The research process chap 2
The document discusses the purpose and process of conducting a literature review. It states that the literature review helps researchers understand the problem being investigated, determine what is already known about the key variables and concepts, identify gaps and inconsistencies, and decide on a research design. The literature review involves consulting primary sources like journal articles and theses to learn about existing theories and findings. Researchers must take notes to develop an agenda of topics and keywords to search relevant literature on. The literature is then analyzed, organized, and reported on to introduce and situate the present study within existing scholarship.
Lecture 6 - Literature Review.pptx
This document provides an overview of the literature review process. It discusses what a literature review is, including that it involves published information on a topic within a certain time period and combines both summary and synthesis. The key steps of the literature review process are searching for relevant literature, sorting and prioritizing sources, analytical and evaluative reading of sources, comparing across studies, organizing the content, and writing the review. The document also provides guidance on assessing source quality, developing a focused topic and argument, surveying and critiquing the literature, and addressing gaps in existing research.
Virtual training on Academic publishing
Virtual Training conducted by Librarians among Postgraduate students and faculty at Egerton University with an aim of enhancing discoverability of the e-resources that the university subscribes
Relevance vs credibility
Credibility is an important factor in determining the relevance of information to an information need. To judge credibility, researchers should consider the author's credentials, the publication process such as peer review, and how the knowledge community has responded to the work. Several sources can provide information to assess credibility, such as details about peer review in a database record, information on journals from Ulrichsweb, and metrics on the prestige of the publishing journal. Sections within articles like the methods, results, and conclusions can also provide insight into credibility. Ultimately, individual researchers must make their own judgment about whether a work is credible enough to be relevant for their specific information need.
Presentation1
The document provides guidance on conducting an effective literature review. It defines a literature review as a written overview of major writings on a selected topic, including scholarly articles, books, reports, and websites. The purpose is to understand what others have researched on the topic, identify inconsistencies and gaps, and justify further research. The literature review should include an objective, topic overview, categorization of sources, discussion of source similarities and differences, and identify relationships between works. Sources should be evaluated based on author expertise, evidence supporting arguments, consideration of opposing viewpoints, and contribution to understanding the topic.
Literature Review
This document outlines the process and importance of reviewing literature for research. It discusses reviewing literature as an essential preliminary task to acquaint oneself with existing knowledge in an area of interest. The literature review contributes to clarifying the research problem, improving methodology, broadening knowledge, and contextualizing findings. The procedure involves searching literature, reviewing selections critically, and developing theoretical and conceptual frameworks. Overall, reviewing literature prevents duplicating past work, increases knowledge to refine the research problem, and gives confidence that a particular study is needed by identifying gaps.
Publishing tips UNISA 2019
Tips for getting research works published and a behind the scenes look at a successful Open Journal System journal IRRODL
21st Century Research Part 1 (Summer 2012)
The document discusses different types of academic sources and how to evaluate online sources for research. It notes that academic sources are authoritative, cite other work, are peer-reviewed by other academics, present information objectively, and are written for other academics rather than a general audience. Some examples of academic sources given are journals, books from scholarly publishers, and certain websites from professional organizations. The document provides guidance on evaluating online sources based on their credibility, accuracy, reasonableness, and level of support or documentation. It also offers tips for using Wikipedia as a starting point for research but not as an academic source, as well as strategies for conducting active web research.
MA Film Television and Animation: Library Induction
This document provides an overview of library research methods and resources for students completing an MA degree at Middlesex University. It discusses services available from the library, how to search the library catalog and databases, developing effective search strategies, evaluating information sources, managing research, and referencing materials. Tips are provided on identifying keywords, using search tools like AND/OR/NOT, and searching databases relevant to film and television studies like Film Index International.
Getting Published in academic journals: tips and tricks. 2015
The document provides tips and guidance for scholarly publishing, including:
1. It outlines the benefits of publishing research such as communicating new knowledge, increasing impact and visibility, establishing reputation, and preserving research findings.
2. It describes the publishing process from both the publisher and researcher perspectives, including peer review, revisions, editing, and promotion.
3. It provides advice on choosing a journal, open access options, writing structure, managing references, and measuring impact.
ResearchProcessDC
This document provides guidance on researching and writing academic papers. It outlines four key steps:
1. Define your topic and develop a thesis statement. Brainstorm to identify what you know and want to learn. Clarify assignment requirements.
2. Gather information from various sources like encyclopedias, scholarly articles, websites and books. It compares different source types and provides tips on choosing sources.
3. Analyze and evaluate sources based on author credentials, publication details, biases, date, and ability to verify information. Special considerations are given to evaluating websites.
4. Present the researched information in the paper and properly cite all sources used.
ResearchProcessDC
This document provides guidance on researching and writing academic papers. It outlines four key steps:
1. Define your topic and develop a thesis statement. Brainstorm to identify what you know and want to learn. Clarify assignment requirements.
2. Gather relevant information from different source types like books, articles, and websites. Consider source credibility by examining author expertise, publisher reputation, date of publication, and intended audience.
3. Analyze and evaluate sources by investigating author credentials, bibliographies, publisher agenda, date, location, intended purpose, verifiability, and peer review status. For websites, examine publisher/sponsor and date of last update.
4. Present synthesized information from credible sources while
Academic manuscript to Publication
This document outlines an agenda for a webinar on the process of taking an academic manuscript through publication. It discusses what to do after writing a manuscript, including submitting it to publication houses. It explains the differences between research papers/articles and review papers/articles. It also covers peer review history and process, including types of peer review, criteria, advantages/disadvantages, and ethics. The document provides advice for recognizing peer-reviewed articles and tips for successful publishing based on the webinar content.
Library instruction. basic
This document provides an introduction to identifying scholarly and popular journal articles for college research. It defines scholarly/academic articles as being written by experts, peer-reviewed, and found in journals. Popular articles are for general audiences and found in magazines. Scholarly articles contain in-depth research, references, and bibliographies, while popular articles focus on entertainment. When researching, students should use library databases rather than open internet searches, as databases specialize in scholarly sources and ensure quality information.
محاضرة 3
This document provides guidance on writing a literature review. It defines a literature review as an analysis and synthesis of previous research on a topic. The purpose is to place one's own research in the context of existing literature and identify areas that need further study. The document outlines the components of a literature review, including defining the problem, searching relevant literature, evaluating sources, and analyzing findings. It also provides tips for writing such as developing a thesis, considering organization, using evidence from sources, and revising. The concluding sections emphasize the importance of thoroughly understanding sources and ensuring the literature review relates directly to the research topic.
Similar to Source types (20)
MA Film Television and Animation: Library Induction
MA Film Television and Animation: Library Induction
Getting Published in academic journals: tips and tricks. 2015
Getting Published in academic journals: tips and tricks. 2015
More from DavidPixton
When to stop searching
There are no definitive rules for when to end a literature review. A comprehensive review should include all sources that meet the search criteria or allow further criteria to be applied to determine which sources receive analysis. A review identifying significant contributions should cover highly cited works and recent, unique or impactful works. A review framing new research should represent all key issues influencing the new work. Repeating themes in the literature means the breadth of knowledge has been covered. Researchers should continue scanning for new contributions over their work's duration by setting up automated search queries with database providers.
Purpose of lit review
This document defines literature reviews and outlines their common purposes and products. It discusses two major divisions of literature reviews - those that introduce original research, and those that only collect and summarize existing literature. For the second type, the four most common products are comprehensive assessments of a knowledge domain, quantitative/qualitative assessments of current research, summaries of other reviews, and critical reviews. The intent and desired end product determines how comprehensive the literature review should be.
Purpose of lit review
Literature reviews have specific purposes and end products depending on their type. There are two major types: those that introduce or frame original research, and those that only collect and summarize existing literature. Common products of summarizing reviews include comprehensive assessments of a knowledge domain, quantitative/qualitative assessments of current research through sampling or examining all literature, summaries of other reviews to synthesize information, and critical reviews of influential sources. The intent and end product of the review determines how comprehensive the literature search should be.
Relevance vs Utility
This document discusses how to judge the relevance of information based on its utility. Relevance refers to how well an item meets an information need and depends on its relationship to the topic and practical application. Relevance is often a matter of degree rather than binary. To determine relevance, one must understand the purpose of the information search. Ultimately, for information to be relevant it must be useful - it must add new information not already known. Information from other domains can also be relevant if it helps solve a problem in one's own domain.
Relevance vs Subject
This document discusses judging the relevance of information based on its subject. It defines relevance as how well an item meets an information need. Relevance is determined on a degree, not a binary scale. Information can fall into three zones of relevance - the specific subject domain, broad subject domain, or outside the domain but still tangentially related. When assessing relevance, one should understand their information need and scan different parts of research articles like the abstract, keywords, background, and conclusions to determine the subjects discussed. Database records and paper sections like the abstract and keywords can help identify the topics covered.
Relevance vs Info Needs
This document discusses judging the relevance of information based on information needs. It defines relevance as how well an item meets an information need, which can be a matter of degree rather than binary. When judging relevance, one must understand the purpose of the information search. There are many types of reviews with different purposes that affect what is considered relevant. Systematic reviews take an exhaustive look at literature, critical reviews focus on influential sources, and literature reviews for research papers select sources that frame the research. The relevance of articles depends on the objective of the specific review.
Similarity of sources
This document discusses two techniques for finding relevant articles: searching for similar articles based on references from an initial article, or searching based on subject words if no initial articles have been identified yet. Searching for similar articles utilizes the references and information from an article that has already been found to locate related articles, while searching based on subject words relies on descriptive terms when no initial articles are available as a starting point.
Database information domains
Library databases collect and index information on defined subject areas, with some overlap between databases. Each database represents a subset of journals focused on a specific information need. To determine the best database to search, categorize your topic into broad subject areas like general/cross-disciplinary, general science education, or engineering & technology as a starting point, then search multiple databases as needed to find the required information.
Leveraging articles
Each source references other related sources, creating a network that can be followed forward or backward in time to find additional relevant information. Useful information like keywords, subject terms, related documents, and authors from a known source can also be leveraged to discover other related sources. This document discusses how existing sources can be used to find new sources by following citation links between documents and utilizing metadata like titles and authors.
Type of database searches
Searching a database can be done in different ways:
1) Searching for works by a specific author or institution looks for all records containing that author or institution. This provides a narrow search focused on one entity.
2) Searching for sources about a known topic uses what is already known about the topic to find additional publications on that topic. The topic is defined with some level of detail.
3) Both author/institution searches and topic searches may find sources that were previously unknown or found, depending on the search terms and database searched.
Specific needs
This document defines two types of information needs based on specificity: searching for a known reference where the publication details are already known, and searching for sources that meet certain criteria where the topic is defined but specific publications are unknown. It provides examples of each, such as finding a specific published article with a known title and authors, or finding any articles on a general topic like coordinated control of UAVs.
Topic specificity
The document discusses topic specificity for research, noting that while a perfectly defined topic is not necessary to begin searching, a well-defined topic allows for more efficient searching. It recommends thinking of a topic as a focused area of interest within a broader domain and provides examples of poorly defined, broadly defined, and narrowly defined research topics, with autonomous vehicles, autonomous UAVs, and image recognition algorithms for vision systems in autonomous UAVs as examples ranging from broad to narrow.
Strategies concept block
Concept blocking is a search strategy that breaks topics down into major concepts represented by search terms. Each concept is described with synonyms to capture alternative wordings. The search strings combine the concepts with Boolean operators - using AND between concepts and OR between synonyms. This intuitive approach represents the intersection of knowledge domains that comprise topics. An example breaks down the topic of coordinated control of UAVs into search terms for unmanned aerial vehicles, control/automation, and coordination/cooperation.
Currency
This document discusses how to determine the currency, or recency, of information sources. It notes that what is considered current depends on how rapidly the field is changing, with articles about new materials potentially remaining current for 5 years while those on additive manufacturing may date quickly. It also explains that different source types, like newspapers, conference papers, journal articles, and books, cover events and research at different points along the information cycle, from immediate coverage to discussion years later.
Strategies concept block subject terms
This document discusses concept blocking strategy, an intuitive method for searching topics that breaks them down into major concepts represented by search terms. It recommends using subject terms from databases and considering related terms from thesauri to broaden searches. Search strings should use AND between concepts to narrow the topic and OR between similar terms, while removing concepts broadens the topic. An example search string is provided to coordinate control of unmanned aerial vehicles using subject terms from Compendex.
Strategies successive fractions
This document describes the successive fractions strategy for searching, where a searcher starts with a broad search term related to their topic of interest. They then review the results to identify more specific ideas or topics to refine the search with, adding these additional terms with Boolean AND operators. An example is provided where a searcher starts with a search on "UAV" or "drone", then examines results to add a second search term like "control" or "coordination" to narrow the results. The strategy aims to iteratively refine the search through multiple steps until a manageable number of relevant results are obtained.
Database selection citation indexes
Web of Science and Scopus are citation indexes that provide access to articles in the broad sciences and assist researchers by tracking who cites whom in their articles. Citation indexes allow researchers to find a known article and then click "Cited by" to get a list of articles that have cited the original article.
Subject terms
Subject terms, also known as controlled vocabulary, are special words used by databases to describe what an article is about. Using subject terms allows for a precise search, as the selected terms do not need to be explicitly stated in an article's text. To perform a subject search, you must know the specific terms used by the database. Reviewing subject terms from previous relevant articles found in that database can help identify appropriate search terms, as controlled vocabularies vary between databases.
Database selection google scholar citation
Google Scholar uses web crawlers to link citations together across a broad range of sources on the internet, providing a very comprehensive set of scholarly search results. It tracks citations to articles and papers, allowing users to see which works cite a particular publication. Google Scholar searches a wide variety of academic publications without requiring users to sign in or pay for access.
Type of database searches
This slideshow is part of a Decision-based Learning module for Information Literacy. The information is not intended to stand on its own.
More from DavidPixton (20)
Recently uploaded
LAND USE LAND COVER AND NDVI OF MIRZAPUR DISTRICT, UP
This Dissertation explores the particular circumstances of Mirzapur, a region located in the
core of India. Mirzapur, with its varied terrains and abundant biodiversity, offers an optimal
environment for investigating the changes in vegetation cover dynamics. Our study utilizes
advanced technologies such as GIS (Geographic Information Systems) and Remote sensing to
analyze the transformations that have taken place over the course of a decade.
The complex relationship between human activities and the environment has been the focus
of extensive research and worry. As the global community grapples with swift urbanization,
population expansion, and economic progress, the effects on natural ecosystems are becoming
more evident. A crucial element of this impact is the alteration of vegetation cover, which plays a
significant role in maintaining the ecological equilibrium of our planet.Land serves as the foundation for all human activities and provides the necessary materials for
these activities. As the most crucial natural resource, its utilization by humans results in different
'Land uses,' which are determined by both human activities and the physical characteristics of the
land.
The utilization of land is impacted by human needs and environmental factors. In countries
like India, rapid population growth and the emphasis on extensive resource exploitation can lead
to significant land degradation, adversely affecting the region's land cover.
Therefore, human intervention has significantly influenced land use patterns over many
centuries, evolving its structure over time and space. In the present era, these changes have
accelerated due to factors such as agriculture and urbanization. Information regarding land use and
cover is essential for various planning and management tasks related to the Earth's surface,
providing crucial environmental data for scientific, resource management, policy purposes, and
diverse human activities.
Accurate understanding of land use and cover is imperative for the development planning
of any area. Consequently, a wide range of professionals, including earth system scientists, land
and water managers, and urban planners, are interested in obtaining data on land use and cover
changes, conversion trends, and other related patterns. The spatial dimensions of land use and
cover support policymakers and scientists in making well-informed decisions, as alterations in
these patterns indicate shifts in economic and social conditions. Monitoring such changes with the
help of Advanced technologies like Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Systems is
crucial for coordinated efforts across different administrative levels. Advanced technologies like
Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Systems
9
Changes in vegetation cover refer to variations in the distribution, composition, and overall
structure of plant communities across different temporal and spatial scales. These changes can
occur natural.
Pengantar Penggunaan Flutter - Dart programming language1.pptx
Pengantar Penggunaan Flutter - Dart programming language1.pptx
How to Make a Field Mandatory in Odoo 17
In Odoo, making a field required can be done through both Python code and XML views. When you set the required attribute to True in Python code, it makes the field required across all views where it's used. Conversely, when you set the required attribute in XML views, it makes the field required only in the context of that particular view.
How to Create a More Engaging and Human Online Learning Experience
How to Create a More Engaging and Human Online Learning Experience Wahiba Chair Training & Consulting
Wahiba Chair's Talk at the 2024 Learning Ideas Conference. The History of Stoke Newington Street Names
Presented at the Stoke Newington Literary Festival on 9th June 2024
www.StokeNewingtonHistory.com
BBR 2024 Summer Sessions Interview Training
Qualitative research interview training by Professor Katrina Pritchard and Dr Helen Williams
বাংলাদেশ অর্থনৈতিক সমীক্ষা (Economic Review) ২০২৪ UJS App.pdf
বাংলাদেশের অর্থনৈতিক সমীক্ষা ২০২৪ [Bangladesh Economic Review 2024 Bangla.pdf] কম্পিউটার , ট্যাব ও স্মার্ট ফোন ভার্সন সহ সম্পূর্ণ বাংলা ই-বুক বা pdf বই " সুচিপত্র ...বুকমার্ক মেনু 🔖 ও হাইপার লিংক মেনু 📝👆 যুক্ত ..
আমাদের সবার জন্য খুব খুব গুরুত্বপূর্ণ একটি বই ..বিসিএস, ব্যাংক, ইউনিভার্সিটি ভর্তি ও যে কোন প্রতিযোগিতা মূলক পরীক্ষার জন্য এর খুব ইম্পরট্যান্ট একটি বিষয় ...তাছাড়া বাংলাদেশের সাম্প্রতিক যে কোন ডাটা বা তথ্য এই বইতে পাবেন ...
তাই একজন নাগরিক হিসাবে এই তথ্য গুলো আপনার জানা প্রয়োজন ...।
বিসিএস ও ব্যাংক এর লিখিত পরীক্ষা ...+এছাড়া মাধ্যমিক ও উচ্চমাধ্যমিকের স্টুডেন্টদের জন্য অনেক কাজে আসবে ...
RHEOLOGY Physical pharmaceutics-II notes for B.pharm 4th sem students
Physical pharmaceutics notes for B.pharm students
Main Java[All of the Base Concepts}.docx
This is part 1 of my Java Learning Journey. This Contains Custom methods, classes, constructors, packages, multithreading , try- catch block, finally block and more.
Advanced Java[Extra Concepts, Not Difficult].docx
This is part 2 of my Java Learning Journey. This contains Hashing, ArrayList, LinkedList, Date and Time Classes, Calendar Class and more.
Mule event processing models | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #47
Mule event processing models | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #47
Event Link:- https://meetups.mulesoft.com/events/details/mulesoft-mysore-presents-mule-event-processing-models/
Agenda
● What is event processing in MuleSoft?
● Types of event processing models in Mule 4
● Distinction between the reactive, parallel, blocking & non-blocking processing
For Upcoming Meetups Join Mysore Meetup Group - https://meetups.mulesoft.com/mysore/YouTube:- youtube.com/@mulesoftmysore
Mysore WhatsApp group:- https://chat.whatsapp.com/EhqtHtCC75vCAX7gaO842N
Speaker:-
Shivani Yasaswi - https://www.linkedin.com/in/shivaniyasaswi/
Organizers:-
Shubham Chaurasia - https://www.linkedin.com/in/shubhamchaurasia1/
Giridhar Meka - https://www.linkedin.com/in/giridharmeka
Priya Shaw - https://www.linkedin.com/in/priya-shaw
Bed Making ( Introduction, Purpose, Types, Articles, Scientific principles, N...
Topic : Bed making
Subject : Nursing Foundation
Wound healing PPT
This document provides an overview of wound healing, its functions, stages, mechanisms, factors affecting it, and complications.
A wound is a break in the integrity of the skin or tissues, which may be associated with disruption of the structure and function.
Healing is the body’s response to injury in an attempt to restore normal structure and functions.
Healing can occur in two ways: Regeneration and Repair
There are 4 phases of wound healing: hemostasis, inflammation, proliferation, and remodeling. This document also describes the mechanism of wound healing. Factors that affect healing include infection, uncontrolled diabetes, poor nutrition, age, anemia, the presence of foreign bodies, etc.
Complications of wound healing like infection, hyperpigmentation of scar, contractures, and keloid formation.
Recently uploaded (20)
LAND USE LAND COVER AND NDVI OF MIRZAPUR DISTRICT, UP
LAND USE LAND COVER AND NDVI OF MIRZAPUR DISTRICT, UP
Pengantar Penggunaan Flutter - Dart programming language1.pptx
Pengantar Penggunaan Flutter - Dart programming language1.pptx
IGCSE Biology Chapter 14- Reproduction in Plants.pdf
IGCSE Biology Chapter 14- Reproduction in Plants.pdf
Film vocab for eal 3 students: Australia the movie
Film vocab for eal 3 students: Australia the movie
How to Create a More Engaging and Human Online Learning Experience
How to Create a More Engaging and Human Online Learning Experience
বাংলাদেশ অর্থনৈতিক সমীক্ষা (Economic Review) ২০২৪ UJS App.pdf
বাংলাদেশ অর্থনৈতিক সমীক্ষা (Economic Review) ২০২৪ UJS App.pdf
RHEOLOGY Physical pharmaceutics-II notes for B.pharm 4th sem students
RHEOLOGY Physical pharmaceutics-II notes for B.pharm 4th sem students
Mule event processing models | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #47
Mule event processing models | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #47
Liberal Approach to the Study of Indian Politics.pdf
Liberal Approach to the Study of Indian Politics.pdf
Bed Making ( Introduction, Purpose, Types, Articles, Scientific principles, N...
Bed Making ( Introduction, Purpose, Types, Articles, Scientific principles, N...
Source types
- 2. • Peer-reviewed Journal There are two simple ways to determine if a publication is peer reviewed: 1. Launch ULRICHSWEB from the library webpage and enter the publication name to determine if a publication is peer-reviewed (“refereed”) - look for referee shirt next to the journal entry 2. Check the publication’s website for info on submitting an article – the website will describe a peer review process if it is peer reviewed • Determining Source Type
- 3. • Conference Articles/Proceedings A paper may be presented at a conference and published in the conference proceedings, but is typically not reviewed to the same extent as a journal article; still, a conference paper may contain more current info than a journal article, since the journal publication process is more lengthy. • Determining Source Type
- 4. • Books, Theses or Dissertations, Reports, Patents, etc Other works, including books and theses or dissertations, are not commonly considered to be peer reviewed, but may still contain authoritative and relevant information • Determining Source Type
- 5. v When you are finished viewing this material, please close this tab on your browser and return to the Decision-based Learning tab. v