1. Social Media & Litigation
PBA Solo and Small Firm Conference
Bedford Springs, July, 2015
SARA AUSTIN
AUSTIN LAW FIRM, LLC
JENNIFER ELLIS
LOWENTHAL & ABRAMS, PC / JENNIFER ELLIS, JD, LLC
ANITA PITOCK
LOWENTHAL & ABRAMS, PC
2. Today’s Session
Impact of Social Media on Litigation
Gathering Social Media Evidence
Use of Social Media in Personal Injury & Medical
Malpractice Litigation
Use of Social Media in Employment Law and Business
Litigation
Ethical Issues (Throughout the Presentation)
3. Competence With Technology
Underlying all use of technology is Rule 1.1
New comment added as a result of work by American Bar
Association
Adopted by Pennsylvania
Lawyers must,“keep abreast of changes in the law and its practice,
including the benefits and risks associated with relevant technology,
engage in continuing study and education and comply with all
continuing legal requirements to which the lawyer is subject.”
4. What Does Competence With
Technology Mean?
Must be aware of what kind of technology is required in
your practice
Must be aware of risks and benefits
Must manage the risks
Any technology you choose to use
Must be aware of risks and benefits
Must manage the risks
How?
Educate yourself
Hire competent assistance
In house or out of house
5. 1.44 billion
157 million daily in
US & Canada
21 min per day
1 billion users
4 billion views per day
6 billion hours per month
600 million
22% online adults
at least once per month
300 million
53% of 18-29
60.3 million US
70 million
80% women
42% of online
adult US
Women550 million
50% of
People
Read Blogs
332 million
40% check daily
107 Million US
17 minutes monthly
97% lawyers listed
200,000 active lawyers
Over 6 million questions
12. Loss of Immunity
Publication of pleadings and other
documents can cause the loss of
immunity from defamation.
Sunstar Ventures, LLC. v. Tigani
Bochetto v. Gibson (lawyer faxed
complaint to press)
16. Accessing Data
Privacy Controls
Legal Issues
Don’t violate computer access laws
Hacking into accounts
Using passwords without permission
Make sure clients don’t violate the laws
Hacking
Keycaps and other malware programs
Going beyond permissible access
Ethical Issues
No connecting to opposing side
Must be honest if seeking to connect to witness
Ok to research jurors
May not connect
21. Facebook and Privacy Settings
Privacy settings have a huge impact
on what you can see
Friends can see a lot
Public can only see what owner of
account allows
28. Back to Curtis D. Ellis v. Millie, Rami & Angelou
Curtis is friends on Facebook with Rami and Jennifer
Not with Millie or Angelou
Curtis tags Rami and Jennifer in posts
Rami and Jennifer’s friends see posts where tagged
Jennifer and Rami are friends with all involved
A lot of data can be accessed as a result
33. Federal
Electronic Communications Privacy Act:18 USC § 2510-2522
Includes computer based communications
Includes stored communications
34. Federal
18 USC § 2511
Interception and disclosure of wire, oral,
or electronic communications
prohibited
Intentionally discloses, or endeavors to
disclose, to any other person the
contents of any…communication…
35. Pennsylvania
Unlawful use of computer and other computer
crimes. (3rd Degree Felony) - 18 § 7611
Accesses or exceeds authorization to access
Provides password or other information allowing
access to a third party
40. What Happens in Court?
Foundation
Best Evidence
Relevance
Authentication
Use
41. Social Media & Litigation
PBA Solo and Small Firm Conference
Bedford Springs, July, 2015
SARA AUSTIN
AUSTIN LAW FIRM, LLC
JENNIFER ELLIS
LOWENTHAL & ABRAMS, PC / JENNIFER ELLIS, JD, LLC
ANITA PITOCK
LOWENTHAL & ABRAMS, PC
Editor's Notes
Mention other areas impacted, family, immigration, criminal, etc.
http://expandedramblings.com/index.php/resource-how-many-people-use-the-top-social-media/Jeff Bullas, 22 Social Media Facts and Statistics You Should Know in 2014 (2014.) http://www.jeffbullas.com/2014/01/17/20-social-media-facts-and-statistics-you-should-know-in-2014/
Clients post on social media
Harmful content
Content different from what they tell you and the court
Friends post harmful content
Opposing counsel looks at social media
It can be an ethical violation to fail to review social media accounts
Facebook
Numerous people claim serious injuries and show contradictory information on Facebook
Decreases settlement strength and value of case. Sometimes results in lost cases.
Twitter
Client posted pictures and discussed how she was enjoying life and becoming used to a scar
Low verdict
Blog & MySpace
Woman posted about belly dancing despite claiming a serious injury
Angry judge, loss of substantial alimony
Provide a separate document reminding clients about social media risks and warning not to delete content without preserving it first (ask to preserve it yourself)
Have the client sign the letter
Provide instructions on privacy settings
Review client’s & witnesses social media accounts immediately
Review opposing side’s social media account immediately
Preserve relevant information
Obey ethical rules
Download Entire Facebook Account
Facebook tool
Access site and preserve
Recommend record actions as take screen shots.
Camtasia to record screen and voice
Snagit to record screen shots
Do not do the preservation yourself
Most sites state they will not respond to a civil subpoena
Claim violates Stored Communications Act
Some sites will surprise you so ask
Some sites will cooperate
Provide email address
Provide username or ID number
Can:
Change privacy settings
Disable account
Delete content - must preserve first
Bad behavior? Bad results.
Adverse inverse for deletion – Gatto
$700k in sanctions – Sprouse
Disciplinary Charges
General rule:
Contradictory information viewable in social media account? Discovery granted.
Social media sites will not help in civil cases
Stored Communications Act
Will provide data to government in criminal cases
Sometimes sites will fight
Unique considerations in your areas
What are you looking for
What might opposing counsel be seeking
What issues do you forsee
What should you ask?
How can you confirm ownership?
What happens if the person lies?
If the witness won’t cooperate, what do you do? (call person who preserved the evidence)
What questions will you ask that person?
How do you convince the jury of reliability?What is the law on admission and authentication?