HYPER-SOCIAL INNOVATION

          STARTING AND SUSTAINING

  SMALL I TO   BIG I INNOVATION EFFORTS
"Because the purpose of
business is to create a
customer, the business
enterprise has two--and only
two--basic functions:
marketing and innovation.
Marketing and innovation
produce results; all the rest
are costs.”
                - Peter Drucker
Why Innovation… Now?
1. Drucker’s Quote is from 1954 –
   globalization = need for smarter
   marketing + innovation
2. Knowledge era, not the industrial
   era = adapt or DIE
3. Innovation isn’t the job of R&D or
   Marketing anymore. Innovation is
   everyone’s job – but most aren’t
   trained/experienced in innovation
ARE YOU READY?
10 Year Market Rollercoaster – Nobody Anticipated the 2008 Shock
How do Billionaires fair? Not so good at company level…




     MSFT Underperforming the Market for 10 years
Lean-powered Innovation via Toyota Motors?




      Even during the “runaway car” fiasco, Toyota
          outperformed MSFT and the Market
Compared to Apple?



MSFT and Toyota and Market Index are still on
this chart – but look like flatlines at this scale
Even Google Looks like they’re standing still, but they are well above
the pack…




            See green arrow for Google
Removed Apple to Highlight Google vs. Toyota and MSFT
GOOGLE AND TOYOTA
= SMALL I INNOVATION
   AND THE RESULTS PAY-OFF SIGNIFICANTLY VS.
        “INNOVATION IS ONLY IN R&D”
MICROSOFT IS
INNOVATION BY RETAINING
     MARKETSHARE
  AND THE GROWTH HASN’T APPEARED BY “DOING THINGS
  AS USUAL” (TYPICAL PRODUCT LIFECYCLE IS 3 YEARS PER
                       VERSION)
How About Just Poor Innovation Performance... Period?
• “In the mid 1980s, with
  failure rates approaching
  90 percent, R&D
  expenditures under
  scrutiny and lead times for
  success averaging nearly
  eight years, it was clear
  that a new approach was
  needed [...] 50 percent or
  greater failure rates are
  still the norm.”
   •   What Customers Want, Anthony
                       Ulwick, 2005
APPLE = BIG I
 INNOVATION
MARKETING AND INNOVATION, CONSTANTLY
AND IT WASN’T PURELY ABOUT STEVE JOBS
The Economic Shocks Keep Coming and are More Sudden




                   Sept 2002




                                    Sept 2008
HAVE YOU CHANGED THE
WAY YOU INNOVATE SINCE
       2008?
All Hands on Deck to Handle the Next “Economic Titanic”
• 100 years later, we still don’t
  know what really happened to
  sink the unsinkable ship
• You can’t afford to wait 100 days
  (a financial quarter) to
  understand where things have
  gone wrong
• It’s time to radically speed up
  innovation capability, across the
  board
Kaizen, Lean, and 1,000,000
For every individual P&G researcher




    • Estimated that there are 200 scientists/engineers elsewhere in
      the world who are just as good
    • P&G determined they needed to
      change from "not invented here”
      to enthusiasm for “proudly found elsewhere"
     Source: P&G’s New Innovation Model (Harvard
               Business Review. 2006)
Actionable and Repeatable Innovation = Price of Entry to be in
Business Today
    •   Drucker marketing + innovation from “The Practice of Management”
        (1954)
    •   Innovation as a management issue and business toolkit, has been around
        for over 60 years
    •   Innovation is everyone’s job comes from the quality movement, and birth
        of what we now know as Lean
         – Lean has spread from manufacturing to IT Operations, User
             Experience Design, Funding and Creation of Startups or Skunkworks
             operations, and much more.
               • America, Japan, Germany, Korea, Singapore, Thailand, are all
                 embracing Lean across industries
         – Lean is not only for the automotive industry it’s a mindset of
             continuous improvement and problem solving
         – Innovation toolkits for engineering have spread from the Soviet
             Union 60 years ago, alongside the quality movement – bringing
             “hard science” and predictability to innovation
         – The Art and Science of Large-scale Change Management for
             Innovation (Hyper-social innovation) has become a widely felt need
             since the beginning of the economic slide in 2007.
If Innovation is one of the top two items business should focus on,
why haven’t we?
    • Decades have been spent DISABLING employees from thinking about
      how to innovate.
    • Specialization of roles, departmental boundaries, purpose-built
      applications that serve mini-populations rather than entire
      organizations, enterprise-wide systems, that are too generic and
      unfocused to deliver significant value = expectation that “innovation
      is someone else’s job”
    • We can’t afford to operate as departmental boxes, throwing work
      over to a nameless “next guy, next department” – and assume
      problems will be solved by someone else. The speed of change, and
      our reaction time, won’t allow it anymore.
LET’S TALK
INNOVATION SPEED
IMPROVE “IDEA-TO-CONCEPT”
 TIME FROM TWO MONTHS
        (60 DAYS)

 TO TWO HOURS (.08 DAYS)
WHAT COULD YOUR BUSINESS DO IF YOU
IF YOU INCREASED INNOVATION SPEED BY
               720%?
WHAT ABOUT
CUSTOMER-SERVING
   PROCESSES?
USE LEAN MANUFACTURING TO
     BUILD & DELIVER
            AN ENTIRE CAR

 IN LESS THAN 7 DAYS FROM CUSTOMER PURCHASE, WITH
         THE EXACT DESIGN THE CUSTOMER WANTS
RATHER THAN GUESSING WHAT CUSTOMERS
WILL WANT, WITH 6 MONTHS OF INVENTORY
               SITTING ON THE LOT


  THIS IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN REACTING TO PULL FROM THE
             MARKET, AND TRYING TO PUSH A “NEED.”
   LEAD TIMES IN FAULTY DECISIONS (GUESSES) WILL KILL YOU…
Time to Grow &
             Flex Problem-
            Solving Muscles
 Without
 Taking
Shortcuts
That Will
 Deflate
 Quickly
ARE YOUR
  PEOPLE TRAINED
FOR INNOVATION?
     SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE
If you don’t have the tools to
create & vet ideas at scale...
                         How can you hope to compete with
                                   MASTERS of innovation?




“That’s not a knife...
THIS is a knife”
Crocodile Dundee
DO YOU PROVIDE A
LICENSE TO INNOVATE?
  YOU CAN’T RELY ON MASS MOVEMENTS STARTING AND
             SUSTAINING SPONTANEOUSLY
LICENSE2INNOVATE
IS YOUR
 CULTURE READY
FOR INNOVATION?
                            SOCIAL READINESS
LEADERS, FIRST-FOLLOWERS, AMBASSADORS, EVANGELISTS, CHAMPIONS, OWNERS,
                      REVIEWERS, LEARNERS, PLAYERS
                               THE TRIBE
There are more smart people OUTSIDE of your
    organization, than INSIDE. Guaranteed.

 But there are also more people within your
company who are not CURRENTLY being tapped
  for “innovations” than you’re using today.

       Feel like doubling your odds?
Planning vs Implementing
   In Your Organization, What Community or
   Communities did you target or will you
         target with Crowdsourcing?
          2008 (2 years ago)   2010   2015 (5 years ou




                    Source:
            www.InformationArchitect
                     ed.com
Who to Target?
Target Crowds By Where the Most Value Is
        Most Significant Sources of
              Innovative Ideas




                                    Source: IBM
START A MOVEMENT
LESSONS FROM A SHIRTLESS GUY – IN UNDER 3 MINUTES
Source: http://www.ted.com/talks/derek_sivers_how_to_start_a_movement.html
IF YOU AREN’T
LEVERAGING YOUR
  EMPLOYEES FOR
   INNOVATION…
 YOU ARE MISSING ORDERS OF MAGNITUDE OF
INNOVATION CAPABILITY BEYOND WHAT YOU HAVE NOW
Innovation can be Learned more Quickly than you think…




           Source:24/7 Innovation by Steve Shapiro
BY SPEEDING UP
   INNOVATION
AND INCLUDING MORE WELL-EQUIPPED AND “LICENSED”
 BRAINS INTO THE PROCESS, THE PAYBACK IS INTENSE…
Time to Market (TTM) and Impact on Revenue vs. Spend
Time to Market (TTM) and Impact on Revenue vs. Spend




 SOURCE: PRESENTATION BY VISION CONSULTING (VISION.COM) REGARDING PAYBACK AND AGILE DEVELOPMENT
What if your competitors are even smarter and faster?




 SOURCE: PRESENTATION BY VISION CONSULTING (VISION.COM) REGARDING PAYBACK AND AGILE DEVELOPMENT
ENGAGE YOUR TRIBES
      SOME WILL LEAD, MOST WILL FOLLOW
  IF YOU SET THE ENGAGEMENT ENVIRONMENT UP
                 CORRECTLY
Find “the crazy ones”
    • We're a herding species - and depending on who's numbers you
      believe, the "innovators" who will willingly jump in and lead the way
      with any new change, are somewhere around 2.5% of the
      population.
    • The potential "first followers" are another 13.5% after that, and the
      rest make up the majority who are waiting for consensus/social proof
      to show that it's safe to join a movement.
    • (These #s come from Everett M. Rogers, Diffusion of Innovations,
      Fifth Edition 2003 - which was the pre-cursor of Geoffrey Moore's
      Crossing the Chasm model)
    • Hint: Unlike our earlier tribal days, with big companies, spread out
      over multiple companies, it’s not nearly as obvious where your “sub-
      tribes” hang out – and the anti-social enterprise systems in place are
      likely to keep you from easily finding them, as opposed to the
      customer-tribes that form outside of organizations.
Multi-stage Engagement Effort
    • Lessons learned from the innovators – why they’ve found value, what
      they can see as benefits to others not in their areas (by nature,
      they’re more visionary)
    • For first followers – pairing up mentoring/coaching who are in the
      next level of interest, and support them beyond excitement and into
      getting their own benefits
    • Large-scale – barn-raising, kick-off events with specific targeted
      areas, led by experienced innovators, first-followers who are already
      trained, and targeted at areas that “uncovery” work has shown are
      areas of pain, passion, or interest to large groups.
WITHOUT
ENGAGEMENT…
Reference Articles
    •   Using Lean to Create Innovation Culture
           – http://www.managementexchange.com/hack/groundwork-create-innovation-culture
    •   Know Your Tribe, Be Your Tribe
           – http://www.informationweek.com/thebrainyard/news/232601678/know-your-tribe-be-your-tribe
    •   Social Business: Don't Let Transparency Be A Barrier
           – http://www.informationweek.com/thebrainyard/news/230500036/social-business-dont-let-transparency-be-a-barrier
    •   Enterprise 2.0 Innovators Must Bridge to the Laggards
           – http://www.informationweek.com/thebrainyard/news/231001117/enterprise-20-innovators-must-bridge-to-the-
                laggards
    •   Are Cubicles Killing Us?
           – http://www.informationweek.com/thebrainyard/news/231002493/are-cubicles-killing-us
    •   Are Collaboration Killers Roaming Your Halls?
           – http://www.informationweek.com/thebrainyard/news/231600087/are-collaboration-killers-roaming-your-halls
    •   Collaboration Simulations: Think Big
           – http://www.informationweek.com/thebrainyard/news/232200533/collaboration-simulations-think-big
    •   It’s the Little Things That Count:
           – http://www.informationarchitected.com/blog/innovation-management-its-the-little-things-that-count/
    •   Assessing and Building Innovation Strengths:
           – http://www.business-strategy-innovation.com/2010/04/innovation-perspectives-assessing-and.html
    •   Making Innovation Work in a Downturn (Interview with Carlos Dominguez, SVP at Cisco)
           – http://www.business-strategy-innovation.com/2009/08/making-innovation-work-in-downturn.html
    •   Strategy from Above?
           – http://www.business-strategy-innovation.com/2009/08/innovation-perspectives-strategy-from.html
    •   Get Ahead of the Curve
           – http://www.aiim.org/Resources/Archive/Magazine/2008-Jul-Aug/34899
READY FOR
     INNOVATION?
LET’S TALK INNOVATION ENGAGEMENT STRATEGY AND START
        MAKING A DIFFERENCE TO YOUR BUSINESS,
                   SMALL I   OR BIG   I
Dan Keldsen – Partner at Human 1.0
Enterprise Client Services Focused on Innovation & Insights
(twitter) @dankeldsen
Dan[at]human1.com
617-520-4326
linkedin.com/in/dankeldsen

small i to BIG I Innovation

  • 1.
    HYPER-SOCIAL INNOVATION STARTING AND SUSTAINING SMALL I TO BIG I INNOVATION EFFORTS
  • 2.
    "Because the purposeof business is to create a customer, the business enterprise has two--and only two--basic functions: marketing and innovation. Marketing and innovation produce results; all the rest are costs.” - Peter Drucker
  • 3.
    Why Innovation… Now? 1.Drucker’s Quote is from 1954 – globalization = need for smarter marketing + innovation 2. Knowledge era, not the industrial era = adapt or DIE 3. Innovation isn’t the job of R&D or Marketing anymore. Innovation is everyone’s job – but most aren’t trained/experienced in innovation
  • 4.
  • 5.
    10 Year MarketRollercoaster – Nobody Anticipated the 2008 Shock
  • 6.
    How do Billionairesfair? Not so good at company level… MSFT Underperforming the Market for 10 years
  • 7.
    Lean-powered Innovation viaToyota Motors? Even during the “runaway car” fiasco, Toyota outperformed MSFT and the Market
  • 8.
    Compared to Apple? MSFTand Toyota and Market Index are still on this chart – but look like flatlines at this scale
  • 9.
    Even Google Lookslike they’re standing still, but they are well above the pack… See green arrow for Google
  • 10.
    Removed Apple toHighlight Google vs. Toyota and MSFT
  • 11.
    GOOGLE AND TOYOTA =SMALL I INNOVATION AND THE RESULTS PAY-OFF SIGNIFICANTLY VS. “INNOVATION IS ONLY IN R&D”
  • 12.
    MICROSOFT IS INNOVATION BYRETAINING MARKETSHARE AND THE GROWTH HASN’T APPEARED BY “DOING THINGS AS USUAL” (TYPICAL PRODUCT LIFECYCLE IS 3 YEARS PER VERSION)
  • 13.
    How About JustPoor Innovation Performance... Period? • “In the mid 1980s, with failure rates approaching 90 percent, R&D expenditures under scrutiny and lead times for success averaging nearly eight years, it was clear that a new approach was needed [...] 50 percent or greater failure rates are still the norm.” • What Customers Want, Anthony Ulwick, 2005
  • 14.
    APPLE = BIGI INNOVATION MARKETING AND INNOVATION, CONSTANTLY AND IT WASN’T PURELY ABOUT STEVE JOBS
  • 15.
    The Economic ShocksKeep Coming and are More Sudden Sept 2002 Sept 2008
  • 16.
    HAVE YOU CHANGEDTHE WAY YOU INNOVATE SINCE 2008?
  • 17.
    All Hands onDeck to Handle the Next “Economic Titanic” • 100 years later, we still don’t know what really happened to sink the unsinkable ship • You can’t afford to wait 100 days (a financial quarter) to understand where things have gone wrong • It’s time to radically speed up innovation capability, across the board
  • 18.
  • 19.
    For every individualP&G researcher • Estimated that there are 200 scientists/engineers elsewhere in the world who are just as good • P&G determined they needed to change from "not invented here” to enthusiasm for “proudly found elsewhere" Source: P&G’s New Innovation Model (Harvard Business Review. 2006)
  • 20.
    Actionable and RepeatableInnovation = Price of Entry to be in Business Today • Drucker marketing + innovation from “The Practice of Management” (1954) • Innovation as a management issue and business toolkit, has been around for over 60 years • Innovation is everyone’s job comes from the quality movement, and birth of what we now know as Lean – Lean has spread from manufacturing to IT Operations, User Experience Design, Funding and Creation of Startups or Skunkworks operations, and much more. • America, Japan, Germany, Korea, Singapore, Thailand, are all embracing Lean across industries – Lean is not only for the automotive industry it’s a mindset of continuous improvement and problem solving – Innovation toolkits for engineering have spread from the Soviet Union 60 years ago, alongside the quality movement – bringing “hard science” and predictability to innovation – The Art and Science of Large-scale Change Management for Innovation (Hyper-social innovation) has become a widely felt need since the beginning of the economic slide in 2007.
  • 21.
    If Innovation isone of the top two items business should focus on, why haven’t we? • Decades have been spent DISABLING employees from thinking about how to innovate. • Specialization of roles, departmental boundaries, purpose-built applications that serve mini-populations rather than entire organizations, enterprise-wide systems, that are too generic and unfocused to deliver significant value = expectation that “innovation is someone else’s job” • We can’t afford to operate as departmental boxes, throwing work over to a nameless “next guy, next department” – and assume problems will be solved by someone else. The speed of change, and our reaction time, won’t allow it anymore.
  • 22.
  • 23.
    IMPROVE “IDEA-TO-CONCEPT” TIMEFROM TWO MONTHS (60 DAYS) TO TWO HOURS (.08 DAYS)
  • 24.
    WHAT COULD YOURBUSINESS DO IF YOU IF YOU INCREASED INNOVATION SPEED BY 720%?
  • 25.
  • 26.
    USE LEAN MANUFACTURINGTO BUILD & DELIVER AN ENTIRE CAR IN LESS THAN 7 DAYS FROM CUSTOMER PURCHASE, WITH THE EXACT DESIGN THE CUSTOMER WANTS
  • 27.
    RATHER THAN GUESSINGWHAT CUSTOMERS WILL WANT, WITH 6 MONTHS OF INVENTORY SITTING ON THE LOT THIS IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN REACTING TO PULL FROM THE MARKET, AND TRYING TO PUSH A “NEED.” LEAD TIMES IN FAULTY DECISIONS (GUESSES) WILL KILL YOU…
  • 28.
    Time to Grow& Flex Problem- Solving Muscles Without Taking Shortcuts That Will Deflate Quickly
  • 29.
    ARE YOUR PEOPLE TRAINED FOR INNOVATION? SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE
  • 30.
    If you don’thave the tools to create & vet ideas at scale... How can you hope to compete with MASTERS of innovation? “That’s not a knife... THIS is a knife” Crocodile Dundee
  • 31.
    DO YOU PROVIDEA LICENSE TO INNOVATE? YOU CAN’T RELY ON MASS MOVEMENTS STARTING AND SUSTAINING SPONTANEOUSLY
  • 32.
  • 33.
    IS YOUR CULTUREREADY FOR INNOVATION? SOCIAL READINESS LEADERS, FIRST-FOLLOWERS, AMBASSADORS, EVANGELISTS, CHAMPIONS, OWNERS, REVIEWERS, LEARNERS, PLAYERS THE TRIBE
  • 34.
    There are moresmart people OUTSIDE of your organization, than INSIDE. Guaranteed. But there are also more people within your company who are not CURRENTLY being tapped for “innovations” than you’re using today. Feel like doubling your odds?
  • 35.
    Planning vs Implementing In Your Organization, What Community or Communities did you target or will you target with Crowdsourcing? 2008 (2 years ago) 2010 2015 (5 years ou Source: www.InformationArchitect ed.com
  • 36.
    Who to Target? TargetCrowds By Where the Most Value Is Most Significant Sources of Innovative Ideas Source: IBM
  • 37.
    START A MOVEMENT LESSONSFROM A SHIRTLESS GUY – IN UNDER 3 MINUTES
  • 38.
  • 39.
    IF YOU AREN’T LEVERAGINGYOUR EMPLOYEES FOR INNOVATION… YOU ARE MISSING ORDERS OF MAGNITUDE OF INNOVATION CAPABILITY BEYOND WHAT YOU HAVE NOW
  • 40.
    Innovation can beLearned more Quickly than you think… Source:24/7 Innovation by Steve Shapiro
  • 41.
    BY SPEEDING UP INNOVATION AND INCLUDING MORE WELL-EQUIPPED AND “LICENSED” BRAINS INTO THE PROCESS, THE PAYBACK IS INTENSE…
  • 42.
    Time to Market(TTM) and Impact on Revenue vs. Spend
  • 43.
    Time to Market(TTM) and Impact on Revenue vs. Spend SOURCE: PRESENTATION BY VISION CONSULTING (VISION.COM) REGARDING PAYBACK AND AGILE DEVELOPMENT
  • 44.
    What if yourcompetitors are even smarter and faster? SOURCE: PRESENTATION BY VISION CONSULTING (VISION.COM) REGARDING PAYBACK AND AGILE DEVELOPMENT
  • 45.
    ENGAGE YOUR TRIBES SOME WILL LEAD, MOST WILL FOLLOW IF YOU SET THE ENGAGEMENT ENVIRONMENT UP CORRECTLY
  • 46.
    Find “the crazyones” • We're a herding species - and depending on who's numbers you believe, the "innovators" who will willingly jump in and lead the way with any new change, are somewhere around 2.5% of the population. • The potential "first followers" are another 13.5% after that, and the rest make up the majority who are waiting for consensus/social proof to show that it's safe to join a movement. • (These #s come from Everett M. Rogers, Diffusion of Innovations, Fifth Edition 2003 - which was the pre-cursor of Geoffrey Moore's Crossing the Chasm model) • Hint: Unlike our earlier tribal days, with big companies, spread out over multiple companies, it’s not nearly as obvious where your “sub- tribes” hang out – and the anti-social enterprise systems in place are likely to keep you from easily finding them, as opposed to the customer-tribes that form outside of organizations.
  • 47.
    Multi-stage Engagement Effort • Lessons learned from the innovators – why they’ve found value, what they can see as benefits to others not in their areas (by nature, they’re more visionary) • For first followers – pairing up mentoring/coaching who are in the next level of interest, and support them beyond excitement and into getting their own benefits • Large-scale – barn-raising, kick-off events with specific targeted areas, led by experienced innovators, first-followers who are already trained, and targeted at areas that “uncovery” work has shown are areas of pain, passion, or interest to large groups.
  • 48.
  • 50.
    Reference Articles • Using Lean to Create Innovation Culture – http://www.managementexchange.com/hack/groundwork-create-innovation-culture • Know Your Tribe, Be Your Tribe – http://www.informationweek.com/thebrainyard/news/232601678/know-your-tribe-be-your-tribe • Social Business: Don't Let Transparency Be A Barrier – http://www.informationweek.com/thebrainyard/news/230500036/social-business-dont-let-transparency-be-a-barrier • Enterprise 2.0 Innovators Must Bridge to the Laggards – http://www.informationweek.com/thebrainyard/news/231001117/enterprise-20-innovators-must-bridge-to-the- laggards • Are Cubicles Killing Us? – http://www.informationweek.com/thebrainyard/news/231002493/are-cubicles-killing-us • Are Collaboration Killers Roaming Your Halls? – http://www.informationweek.com/thebrainyard/news/231600087/are-collaboration-killers-roaming-your-halls • Collaboration Simulations: Think Big – http://www.informationweek.com/thebrainyard/news/232200533/collaboration-simulations-think-big • It’s the Little Things That Count: – http://www.informationarchitected.com/blog/innovation-management-its-the-little-things-that-count/ • Assessing and Building Innovation Strengths: – http://www.business-strategy-innovation.com/2010/04/innovation-perspectives-assessing-and.html • Making Innovation Work in a Downturn (Interview with Carlos Dominguez, SVP at Cisco) – http://www.business-strategy-innovation.com/2009/08/making-innovation-work-in-downturn.html • Strategy from Above? – http://www.business-strategy-innovation.com/2009/08/innovation-perspectives-strategy-from.html • Get Ahead of the Curve – http://www.aiim.org/Resources/Archive/Magazine/2008-Jul-Aug/34899
  • 51.
    READY FOR INNOVATION? LET’S TALK INNOVATION ENGAGEMENT STRATEGY AND START MAKING A DIFFERENCE TO YOUR BUSINESS, SMALL I OR BIG I
  • 52.
    Dan Keldsen –Partner at Human 1.0 Enterprise Client Services Focused on Innovation & Insights (twitter) @dankeldsen Dan[at]human1.com 617-520-4326 linkedin.com/in/dankeldsen

Editor's Notes

  • #3 "Because the purpose of business is to create a customer, the business enterprise has two--and only two--basic functions: marketing and innovation. Marketing and innovation produce results; all the rest are costs. Marketing is the distinguishing, unique function of the business.”- Peter Drucker
  • #33 A License to Innovate gives people literal permission to innovate as a baseline, and regularly prompts them to be thinking about innovation.It also a reminder to everyone that EVERYONE has a role to play in innovation – innovation is a team sport, not the lone inventor.
  • #41 From 24/7 innovation – steveshapiro