Australia recalled its ambassador from Indonesia in response to the executions of two Australian citizens by the Indonesian government. The executions strained relations between the two countries, with Australia viewing the actions as a disregard for human rights. Indonesia faced international criticism and negative impacts to its reputation after carrying out the executions.

1. Indonesian executions, Australia
recalls ambassador
SRI GUSTI RAHAYU
12.88203.019

2. Discourse analysis by farclaugh
approaches
As a student in university, we must analysis
the background of the news, and as a analyzer
want to analysis the news about Australia
recalls their ambassador from Indonesia
because executions. In farclaugh approaches
have 3 analysis, there are text, discursive
practice and the last is practice social.

3. 1. Text
From the title is we can see the title is
Indonesian executions : Australia recalls
ambassador. The sentence is bold sentence
and more bigger more then other word .its
mean that this is the key word of the news
and the big issue. Australia told us and the
world about their threat if Indonesia do
executions with two people from their
country.

4. In the first sentence (bold sentence) its mean
that Indonesia has made a big mistake /
execution) with two people from Australia.
Australia give criticism and threat (recalls their
ambassador) from Indonesia and they prove
it.

5. In the last paragraph , there is a bold
sentence, stated that, one of the suspect of
this case has delayed the executions. The
suspect form Philippines. This sentence show
that the Australia “jealous” why Indonesia
gave dispensation with the suspect from
Philippines. Australia thought Indonesia more
appreciate with Philippines more than
Australia.

6. In here has 2 pictures, the first picture is one
of the suspect execution, he is Andrew chan.
In here, we can see Andrew Chan in prison,
and the second picture is the expressions of
the Australia society about this executions.
Their expression is sad because of this
executions and the respect with the suspect.

7. From all of the text we can get the result is
this text is provocateur text, because this text
make Indonesia get negative impact, and this
text can make the relationship between
Indonesia with other country will be stretch.
Australia assume that Indonesia don’t
appreciate the other country and does not
appreciate human right.

8. 2. Discursive practice
• This news was produced by BBC. BBC is the media
social, and this is international media andall of
the reader around the world can read this news.
• Indonesia BBC produced this news on 29th April,
2015.
• BBC produce this news because this is
international problem both of two countries,
Indonesia and Australia. BBC want to show to the
world the problem.
• The beyond of this news is austrlai it self. They
want to provocate other country about indonesia

9. 3. Social practice
• In this case, Australia stated/prove that what
they said is not just “ a talk” not only a threat.
They want show to the world that they are
serious with their argument. Don’t think they
are joke with their argument.

10. • And the impact of this case, the good
relationship Indonesia and Australia will
stretch because of this case. Australia
assumed that Indonesia did not appreciate the
good relationship and the good cooperation
that has existed so far.

11. • Indonesia get the negative comment from
other country. Other country speculate that
Indonesia does not appreciate the people
from other country, Indonesia does not
appreciate the human right.
• Indonesia citizens, will feel insecure with the
relationship between indonesia australia.

12. • The ambassador of Australia provocateur the
other country to have the bad things about
Indonesia.
• From this news, this news just talk about the
bad thing (execution).

13. • In this text, we can see, just the Australia
government that insist to refuse the execution
although two of their society have the big case
(drug) in Indonesia. They defense their
society. So many the respon of Australia
society. There are agree with the execution
and there are don’t agree with this execution.
Because of this case, Australia cutting their
donation 40% from Indonesia.