Sarah L. Shreeves
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Special Libraries Association – Arabian Gulf Chapter 2014
March 25, 2014 - Doha, Qatar
INTERNATIONAL
DEVELOPMENTS IN OPEN
ACCESS:
An overview of trends at the national,
funder, and institutional levels
Open by Matt Katzenburger http://www.flickr.com/photos/matthileo/4826783509/ CC BY-NC-SA 2.0
Whether open access is
„good‟ is no longer the
question.
The question is how open
access will be
implemented and who will
make that decision.
Open access literature is
digital, online, free of charge,
and free of most copyright
and licensing restrictions.
- Peter Suber
DEFINITIONS
 Most open access discussions and activities are
focused on the peer-reviewed journal literature
 Open access can also apply to monographs,
conference papers and presentations, textbooks,
and other scholarly output
 Open access is a model seen across all disciplines,
but has the most activity in the sciences.
DEFINITIONS
TWO (AND A HALF) ROADS
TO OPEN ACCESS
Open Access
Publishing
(journals & books)
„gold‟ „hybrid‟
Archiving
(self, institutional,
disciplinary)
„green‟
Two Roads Were There by Simon Kirby
http://www.flickr.com/photos/1000/187984223/ (CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)
GRATIS and LIBRE
 Gratis: You can read it for free. Anything
else, you better ask permission.
 Libre: With credit given, OK to text-mine, re-
catalog, mirror for preservation, quote,
remix, whatever.
 Most OA is gratis. You get to “libre” via
Creative Commons licensing, usually.
Definitions from Dorothea Salo
POLICIES
National
Funder
Institutional
Sub-institutional
Governments
WHO ARE THE ACTORS?
Public
Libraries
Researchers
Research
funders
Publishers
Research
institutions
Business
Economic good
WHAT ARE THE DRIVERS?
Access
Sustainability
Wide
dissemination
Return on
Investment
Customer
demand
Increased
visibility
Innovation
INSTITUTIONAL
MANDATE/POLICY
• Often permission based (i.e. the faculty grant rights to
institution to make available research)
• Successful institutional policies:
• Come from the faculty themselves
• Include an opt out waiver
• Infrastructure support sits in the Library often
(usually through the use of an institutional
repository)
• Do not specify where faculty should publish
Widener Memorial Library by Mak506 http://www.flickr.com/photos/mak506/2771080083/ (CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)
SUB-INSTITUTIONAL POLICIES
- Some departments
/ research centers
- Most often focused
on electronic
theses and
dissertations
NATIONAL AND FUNDER POLICIES
 National policies are often essentially
funder policies (i.e. are put in effect via
the funders)
 Increasingly private funders – particularly
in medical sector – are instituting OA
policies
Nov 2013 – Argentina
passes law that requires
publicly funded research
to be made openly
available in a repository.
May 2012 - United
Kingdom Finch
Report that requires
OA with emphasis on
„gold‟
Feb 2013 – White
House issues a
directive to federal
agencies to require
open access
Dec 2013 – European
Commission requires OA
through Horizon 2020
Initiative.
See also national funders in
- Australia
- Canada
- Denmark
- Norway
- Peru
- Singapore….and more
CASE STUDY: OPEN ACCESS AT THE
NATIONAL LEVEL IN THE US
2005 US National Institutes of Health strongly
recommends OA to published research
2006 Introduction of the Federal Research
Publication Access Act (also 2010,2012)
2008 US NIH policy enacted into law as
requirement of funding
2011 Introduction of the Research Works Act
2012 Research Works Act loses support
2013 Introduction of Fair Access to Science
and Technology Act
2013 NIH starts to enforce compliance for OA
policy
February 2013
John P. Holdren, Director of the Office of
Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) of
the White House, issues a memorandum
directing all federal agencies with over
$100 million in research and development
expenditures to “develop a plan to support
increased public access to the results of
research funded by the Federal
Government.”
2014 - Introduction of the Frontiers in Innovation, Research, Science and Technology
Act (FIRST)
HOW WILL THE OSTP DIRECTIVE BE
IMPLEMENTED?
 The Clearinghouse for the Open Research of the United
States (CHORUS) from a group of over 100 publishers and
related organizations. See http://chorusaccess.org/.
 Shared Access Research Ecosystem (SHARE) from the
Association of Research Libraries (ARL), the Association of
American Universities (AAU), and the Association of Public
and Land-grant Universities (APLU). See
http://www.arl.org/focus-areas/public-access-
policies/shared-access-research-ecosystem-share
 Or ????
What‟s next?
I see two possible scenarios, one in
which publishers effectively appropriate
OA to their own ends, another in which
the research community takes charge
and oversees the development of an OA
environment more suited to its needs
than the needs of publishers.
– Richard Poynder, March 2014
Questions?
Comments?
sshreeve@illinois.edu
Title Slide: Open by Matt Katzenburger
http://www.flickr.com/photos/matthileo/4826783509 / under a CC BY-NC-SA 2.0
Two Roads Were There by Simon Kirby http://www.flickr.com/photos/1000/187984223 /
(CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)
Widener Memorial Library by Mak506
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mak506/2771080083 / (CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)
All Photos used under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Share-Alike
2.0 License. If you reuse this presentation, PLEASE INCLUDE CREDITS FOR
IMAGES REFERENCED ABOVE!!
This presentation is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution Non -Commercial
Share-Alike 4.0 License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Images
used may have different terms; please consult with the terms associated with those
images before reusing them.
ATTRIBUTION/LEGAL STUFF

International developments in open access: An overview of trends at the national, funder, and institutional levels

  • 1.
    Sarah L. Shreeves Universityof Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Special Libraries Association – Arabian Gulf Chapter 2014 March 25, 2014 - Doha, Qatar INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENTS IN OPEN ACCESS: An overview of trends at the national, funder, and institutional levels Open by Matt Katzenburger http://www.flickr.com/photos/matthileo/4826783509/ CC BY-NC-SA 2.0
  • 2.
    Whether open accessis „good‟ is no longer the question.
  • 3.
    The question ishow open access will be implemented and who will make that decision.
  • 4.
    Open access literatureis digital, online, free of charge, and free of most copyright and licensing restrictions. - Peter Suber DEFINITIONS
  • 5.
     Most openaccess discussions and activities are focused on the peer-reviewed journal literature  Open access can also apply to monographs, conference papers and presentations, textbooks, and other scholarly output  Open access is a model seen across all disciplines, but has the most activity in the sciences. DEFINITIONS
  • 6.
    TWO (AND AHALF) ROADS TO OPEN ACCESS Open Access Publishing (journals & books) „gold‟ „hybrid‟ Archiving (self, institutional, disciplinary) „green‟ Two Roads Were There by Simon Kirby http://www.flickr.com/photos/1000/187984223/ (CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)
  • 7.
    GRATIS and LIBRE Gratis: You can read it for free. Anything else, you better ask permission.  Libre: With credit given, OK to text-mine, re- catalog, mirror for preservation, quote, remix, whatever.  Most OA is gratis. You get to “libre” via Creative Commons licensing, usually. Definitions from Dorothea Salo
  • 8.
  • 9.
    Governments WHO ARE THEACTORS? Public Libraries Researchers Research funders Publishers Research institutions Business
  • 10.
    Economic good WHAT ARETHE DRIVERS? Access Sustainability Wide dissemination Return on Investment Customer demand Increased visibility Innovation
  • 11.
    INSTITUTIONAL MANDATE/POLICY • Often permissionbased (i.e. the faculty grant rights to institution to make available research) • Successful institutional policies: • Come from the faculty themselves • Include an opt out waiver • Infrastructure support sits in the Library often (usually through the use of an institutional repository) • Do not specify where faculty should publish Widener Memorial Library by Mak506 http://www.flickr.com/photos/mak506/2771080083/ (CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)
  • 12.
    SUB-INSTITUTIONAL POLICIES - Somedepartments / research centers - Most often focused on electronic theses and dissertations
  • 13.
    NATIONAL AND FUNDERPOLICIES  National policies are often essentially funder policies (i.e. are put in effect via the funders)  Increasingly private funders – particularly in medical sector – are instituting OA policies
  • 14.
    Nov 2013 –Argentina passes law that requires publicly funded research to be made openly available in a repository. May 2012 - United Kingdom Finch Report that requires OA with emphasis on „gold‟ Feb 2013 – White House issues a directive to federal agencies to require open access Dec 2013 – European Commission requires OA through Horizon 2020 Initiative. See also national funders in - Australia - Canada - Denmark - Norway - Peru - Singapore….and more
  • 15.
    CASE STUDY: OPENACCESS AT THE NATIONAL LEVEL IN THE US 2005 US National Institutes of Health strongly recommends OA to published research 2006 Introduction of the Federal Research Publication Access Act (also 2010,2012) 2008 US NIH policy enacted into law as requirement of funding 2011 Introduction of the Research Works Act 2012 Research Works Act loses support 2013 Introduction of Fair Access to Science and Technology Act 2013 NIH starts to enforce compliance for OA policy
  • 16.
    February 2013 John P.Holdren, Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) of the White House, issues a memorandum directing all federal agencies with over $100 million in research and development expenditures to “develop a plan to support increased public access to the results of research funded by the Federal Government.”
  • 17.
    2014 - Introductionof the Frontiers in Innovation, Research, Science and Technology Act (FIRST) HOW WILL THE OSTP DIRECTIVE BE IMPLEMENTED?  The Clearinghouse for the Open Research of the United States (CHORUS) from a group of over 100 publishers and related organizations. See http://chorusaccess.org/.  Shared Access Research Ecosystem (SHARE) from the Association of Research Libraries (ARL), the Association of American Universities (AAU), and the Association of Public and Land-grant Universities (APLU). See http://www.arl.org/focus-areas/public-access- policies/shared-access-research-ecosystem-share  Or ????
  • 18.
  • 19.
    I see twopossible scenarios, one in which publishers effectively appropriate OA to their own ends, another in which the research community takes charge and oversees the development of an OA environment more suited to its needs than the needs of publishers. – Richard Poynder, March 2014
  • 20.
  • 21.
    Title Slide: Openby Matt Katzenburger http://www.flickr.com/photos/matthileo/4826783509 / under a CC BY-NC-SA 2.0 Two Roads Were There by Simon Kirby http://www.flickr.com/photos/1000/187984223 / (CC BY-NC-SA 2.0) Widener Memorial Library by Mak506 http://www.flickr.com/photos/mak506/2771080083 / (CC BY-NC-SA 2.0) All Photos used under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Share-Alike 2.0 License. If you reuse this presentation, PLEASE INCLUDE CREDITS FOR IMAGES REFERENCED ABOVE!! This presentation is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution Non -Commercial Share-Alike 4.0 License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Images used may have different terms; please consult with the terms associated with those images before reusing them. ATTRIBUTION/LEGAL STUFF

Editor's Notes

  • #2 Thank you so much for having me. I’m really pleased to be speaking here today and to be on this gorgeous campus. Coming from the flatlands of Illinois it’s also quite nice to be able to look out the window and see mountains.What I’m hoping to do in the next little bit is give a quick – whirlwind – tour of some of the trends out there in the broader world of scholarly communication and then to bring those back to the work that all of us do with theses and dissertations and student scholarship. I was very inspired by Char Miller’s keynote yesterday on student scholarship and openness and it made me think a lot about the responsibility we have to our students to give them agency and control and ownership. I hope that I can touch a little bit on these themes through out this talk.
  • #21 To help our libraries begin to build the capacity to……