Overview of SK INSPIRE transposition and implementation 04.07.2013, TAIEX 53350 Macedonia Study visit on INSPIRE interoperability data sets and services @ Slovak environmental agency, Banská Bystrica, Slovakia

1. SK INSPIRE monitoring &
reporting (2013)
Overview of SK INSPIRE transposition and
implementation
Martin Tuchyňa, Marek Žiačik
04.07.2013, TAIEX Study visit on INSPIRE interoperability data sets and services
Slovak environmental agency, Banská Bystrica, Slovakia

2. Content
• Purpose
• Legal requirements
• Monitoring
• Reporting

3. Purpose
• INSPIRE Monitoring:
– Monitoring by EÚ Member States of the
implementation and use of their infra structures for
spatial information
– Collection of information via indicators
– On annual basis (by 15th of May)
• INSPIRE Reporting
– Reporting on the implementation of Directive
2007/2/EC (INSPIRE)
– Via textual report with standardised structure
– Each 3 years (In 2013 for period 2010-2012)

4. Legal requirements
• INSPIRE Directive (2007/2/EC)
• Implementing rules (Commission EÚ
Decision regarding INSPIRE
monitoring and reporting)
• SK Law No. 3/2010 about National
spatial data infrastructure
SK
• Decree No. 352/2011 implementing
above law.

5. Monitoring
SK Monitoring 2013 SR (http://skr.sk/aco )
SK Monitoring On-line web tool (http://inspire.gov.sk/inspire-monitoring)
inspire-monitoring
Bratislava Self-Governing Region
State Geological Institute of Dionýz Štúr
Geodesy, Cartography and Cadastre Authority of Slovak
Republic
Statistical Office of the SR
Hydromelioracie, s.p.
The Monuments Board of the Slovak Republic
Košice Self-Governing Region
The Slovak Museum of Nature Protection and Speleology
Ministry of Interior of SR
The State Nature Conservancy of the SR
National Forest Centre
Topographic Institute
Slovak Environmental Agency
Vodohospodárska výstavba
Slovak Hydrometerological Institute
Water Research Institute
Slovak Ground Water Management
Žilina Self-Governing Region
Soil Science and Conservation Research Institute

6. Monitoring
Parameter
2009
2010
2011
2012
Involved organisations
13
16
18
20
Described datasets
115
169
183
195
Described services
21
17
31
35
Datasets described by
metadata (%)
33
43
89
93
IR compliant Metadata (%)
45
31
77
90
IR compliant Datasets (%)
13
10
5
10
Metadata available via
services (%)
66
19
71
78
Datasets available via
services (%)
44
5
5
7
d 33/ v 57/ dl
10
d 29/ v 59/ dl
12
d 19/ v 68/ dl
13
d 11/ v80/ dl
9
Network service category (%)
d – discovery, v – view,
dl - download

7. Monitoring
• Pros:
– On-line web tool
– Indicators calculation automatisation
• Cons:
– Themes without description:
– Human health and safety
– Agricultural and aquaculture facilities,
– Population distribution – demography,
– Meteorological geographical features,
– Energy resources,
– Mineral resources.

8. Reporting
SK Reporting 2013 SR (http://skr.sk/acp)
acp

9. Reporting
• Focus on:
– Organisation, co-ordination and quality
assurance
– Contribution to the functioning and
coordination of the infrastructure
– Usage of the infrastructure for spatial
information
– Data sharing arrangements
– Cost and benefit aspects

10. Reporting
• Overall status:
– INSPIRE stepwise implementation (SK INSPIRE Report 2013)
• Prons
– Transposition via new law on NSDI
– Centralised coordination structures establishment
– Pilot Geoportal deployed with CZ cooperation
– Availability of metadata, discovery, view services
– Involvement in SDI related EU projects
• Cons
– Cost&benefits aspects
– Data sharing harmonisation
– Limited support and importance
– Reduced stakeholders awareness and involvement
– Limited presence of transformation services
– Absence of download services

11. Reporting – organisation&contribution
• Coordination structure:
– Established in 2010
– Representation:
• Significant (Data/Service
Producers)
• Limited (Users)
– Themes affiliation
• Stakeholders:
– High involvement
• Governmental sector
– Semi involvement
• Academic, Private sector
– Limited involvement
• Regional and local
authorities, NGOs

12. Reporting – infrastructure use

13. Reporting – infrastructure use
• User logs from 2012

14. Reporting – infrastructure use
• SK users distribution from 2012

15. Reporting
• Data sharing
– Current status
• Ad hoc Individual agreements
• Low level of agreement’s content and structure harmonisation
• Absence of SDI related licence registry
• Outlook
– Licencing framework:
• Development of NSDI licence policy
• Localisation and deployment of INSPIRE licences
• Preparation of Grand Agreement
– Ensuring access and exchange of data sets&services

16. Reporting
• Costs & Benefits
– Costs
• Mainly quantitative
• Limited amount of information available
• Costs occurred with INSPIRE transposition and
implmentation
• Costs foreseen to be occurred in order to fulfill legal
obligations (est. 12 mil.€)
– Benefits
• Mainly qualitative
• Main benefits foreseen:
– Time savings (for governmental bodies as well as citizens)
– Budget savings
– Improved tax incomes via added value services
– Improved transparency, innovations, social inclusion

17. Thank you!
martin.tuchyna@sazp.sk
04.07.2013, TAIEX Study visit on INSPIRE interoperability data sets and services
Slovak environmental agency, Banská Bystrica, Slovakia