Similarities Between The Great Migration And The Rebellion...

Similarities Between The Great Migration And The Rebellion...
Canada has long been a nation of unparalleled development and evolution. Canadian history spans
hundreds of years, covering events from varying points of views, and contains dimensions of
culture, theme, and politics. Over the years, Canada has really shaped as a nation politically,
economically, and socially. Specifically, there are two events that helped on shaping Canada, the
Great Migration and the Rebellion of 1837. The Rebellion of 1837 was the stepping stone to reform
in the government in Upper and Lower Canada. It was quite significant in achieving responsible
government in Upper and Lower Canada. The Great Migration was an era of population growth and
economy boost in Canada. The question is which one was better? The impacts of the ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
However, there is a more significant event that made Canada, the War of 1812. It had a powerful,
invigorating influence on what would become Canada. For one thing, the outcome left its territory
intact instead of swallowed by the United States. Moreover, it also wrought a deep psychological
change. Before 1812 many settlers, especially in what is now Ontario, did not feel particularly
Canadian. Some were United Empire Loyalists, arriving here after being driven north by the
revolution. Americans lured over the border by the prospect of easily available land. They had no
strong connection to the Crown. If the United States had been successful in their endeavour it is
likely that Canada would not have evolved as a separate country. As Eric Nicol said, "very little is
known about the War of 1812 because the Americans lost it." No one imagined that they were
defending what would grow to become the second–biggest country in the world, spanning an entire
continent. Surely, none could foresee that the roots they planted and protected would one day
blossom into the diverse, free and prosperous Canada that exists
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

War Of 1812 Essay Outline
The War of 1812 was a military conflict between Great Britain and the United States that was fought
from 1812 to 1815. Canada became involved due to the fact that they were a colony of Great Britain
at the time and Canada had been invaded on multiple occasions by the United States. The war began
because of conflict between Great Britain and the United States when Great Britain adopted
economic sanctions that restricted American trade. Britain also infuriated the Americans when the
HMS Geurriere attacked an American vessel looking for British born sailors on May 1st 1811 to
force them into the Royal Navy. The Americans were already outraged about the sanctions and the
attack simply brought it to the next level. On June 18, 1812, United States declared war on ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Rebellions of 1837 and the act of Union played a crucial role in the merge, the merge occurred
to create a single parliament with equal representatives from both Upper and Lower Canada. The
War not only unified the populace but it also developed political conservatism. In Upper Canada,
multiple conservative families bonded together to create the "Family Concept" also know as
"Tories". This concept was against any type of liberal reforms, they wanted to keep the loyalist
traditions. While the "Family Concept" was in Upper Canada, a group formed in Lower Canada. The
group in Lower Canada were known as the "Chateau Clique", the members were mainly British
merchants who consolidated power after the War ended. This group attempted to assimilate the
French–Canadians by creating British law and changing the Roman Catholic churches to Anglican
churches. These two groups dominated for approximately 25 years after the war until the Act of
Union was singed in 1841. There goal was to keep British values in Canada and they were
successful because today, Canada is still a member of the

Similarities Between Canada And Canada
When it comes to certain qualities and attributes of the United States of America and Canada, many
people residing elsewhere fail to tell the difference. The accents of people from certain parts of both
countries, for instance, are so incredibly indistinguishable that they baffle any and everyone. Besides
this one factor, they even share some comparable cultural characteristics, such as driving on the
right side of the road and cherishing the same basic human rights to the utmost importance.
Likewise, there are several similarities between multiple aspects of the countries' respective
governments, including within their individual established frameworks, political systems, and their
divisions of authorities and duties. These could potentially point out a reason as to why Canada and
the United States are immensely successful in their particular objectives, and are on their paths to
achieving their long–term goals with difficult to accomplish, yet beneficial visions. After all, they
are both either on the way to becoming or currently are two of world's leading superpowers
(Financial Post). However, there is not just one particular infallible way to rule a country and push it
to further advancement simultaneously. In fact, each country works and functions differently, which
is primarily due to individual background and history. Ultimately, although Canada and the United
States of America are both nations that share similarities in various parts of their Constitutions,
political

Why Is The Upper Canada's Constitution Revolutionary
Starting with the Constitution Act of 1791, Canada was divided into two parts: Upper Canada and
Lower Canada. Upper Canada was where the wealthy British, known as the Family Compact,
resided. Lower Canada was where the less wealthy French resided. Although Lower Canada had its
own branch of government, known as the Legislative Assembly, it had tremendously limited power.
After many Canadians voiced their anger towards this circumstance, the Constitution of 1867 was
created (Billingsley, 2013). The constitution combined Lower Canada and Upper Canada, and it
gave the people much more rights, although it did not actually make Canada an independent
country. Canada's road to independence was, to a large extent, evolutionary and not revolutionary
because it was unoriginal and because it took much too long of a time for its changes to be
considered revolutionary. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Initially, Canadians were upset because they were being taxed without any sort of representation
since the Legislative Assembly had very limited power. However, in 1775 (History.com, 2018), the
United States began a war with England because they were upset about taxation without
representation as well. Clearly, Canadians were not fighting for an original cause. In addition,
Canadians desired a government that gave more power to the Legislative Assembly. The American
Revolution already fought so that they could have a government that listened to the people, so
Canada's desires were not original either. Nothing about Canada's independence movement
dramatically altered the world. Canada's independence movement certainly benefited Canadians,
which made it evolutionary, but it simply did not have enough of an impact on the rest of the world
for it to be considered

Canadian Rebellions
List some of the impacts of the rebellions of Upper and Lower Canada
There are many lasting impacts of the rebellions of Upper and Lower Canada that are even present
today 200 years later. First is that Canada has a democratic government. During the rebellions,
Canadians could elect representatives but the representatives had very little power. The government
didn't care about the thoughts of the common person. Today the people cast votes for the Prime
Minister instead of it already being decided by a counsel of rich people. He cares about people's
opinions and tries to appeal to them to win office. Another way Canada has been influenced is we
are one country and are multicultural. Back in 1837 Canada was divided into two parts the French–
speaking

Quebec Should Not Separate from Canada
Quebec should not separate from Canada
Quebec was founded by French settlers during the 16th century. It was then conquered by the British
(known as the conquest of New France in 1760). "The Philosophy of the Enlightment" allowed
Britain's victory to treat the French people with dignity as both nations were civilized societies
(source?). The British allowed the French occupants to maintain cultural aspects such as language
and traditions (source?). In effect, The Quebec Act was published in 1974, in efforts to ensure
loyalty from the French as the British government worried that the remaining French people would
support the American Independent War (source?). The act was favourable for French people;
allowing the continual practice of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Trade barriers and agreements prevent free flow of goods and services. Quebec's main industries of
textiles, furniture and dairy farms are reliant on the rest of Canada, would be adversely affected. For
example, dairy products from Quebec, which provide half of the industrial milk for the rest country,
would be subjected to higher prices and would decrease its demand. Quebec would lose a stable
supply of oil and gasoline from Canada (source). Resources of this nature in any industry would be a
sensitive matter and problematic as people would be subjected to higher energy costs.
International trade agreements would spread to both Canada and Quebec in negotiations with
foreign countries. The negotiation processes are time consuming with high expenses and exhausting
efforts. For example, to negotiate a free trade agreement with the United States, it took more than
two years with over a hundred of employees (source?). The aggregate costs of the negotiations were
estimated to be 30 million dollars (source?). Quebec does not only need to renegotiate with the
United States; it would then have to negotiate with an additional 170 countries. Due to the high
intervention of Quebec government in the economy, it is unlikely Quebec would attain sustainable
free trade agreements with other countries. Given the weaker external position of Quebec in foreign
affairs, it is not easy for the province to bargain higher benefits individually in international

The Irony Of Differing Perspectives
The Irony of Differing Perspectives
Till 1827, the idea of sobriety was practically non–existent in North–America . Taverns were open at
all times of day and were a place of encounter for everyone – regardless of class, race and gender.
Moreover, they facilitated 'political negotiations, economic exchanges and interracial sociability .
So, where did the idea of reducing alcohol consumption come from amid the booming socio–
economic stability that taverns seemed to provide?
Except for Peter DeLottinville who recounts the honest events that occurred in Joe Beef's Canteen,
the other authors claim that the temperance movement was used for ulterior motives than it appeared
to be on the surface. For instance, in Glenn J. Lockwood's Temperance in ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
During the period of time that the temperance movement was gaining momentum, the Catholic
church hopped on board to speed up the process and gain as many converts as they could using their
up until then secret weapon: Chiniquy. However, the hidden intention/objective was to regain the
Catholic church's popularity and confidence after Catholics were becoming outnumbered by the
influx of Irish famine immigrants and wanted to become 'more industrious and progressive' (cite).
Unlike all of the previously mentioned authors, DeLottinville does not imply that Joe Beef tried his
best to alleviate problems of housing, job hunting, healthcare and labor unrest with any kind of
hidden agenda. Beef genuinely cared for the welfare of the working class of Montreal and took it
upon himself to represent/assume the voice of the casual laborers . In this case, the Middle Class
was the one benefiting from the temperance movement as they were afraid Beef would succeed and
have laborers demands adhered to. In the same way that Beef's canteen was a place where 'every
grade in the social scale was represented' (CHANGE), many other taverns were also used for both
political and economic interracial exchanges and relationships.
In other words, whereas taverns were used as tools to strengthen a sense of belonging and security,
and often attempted to prove the worthiness of the lower classes, temperance was

Government in Upper and Lower Canada
The need for government reform in Upper and Lower Canada was created because of the
incompetent way the government managed the country, a lack of representation in the government, a
lack of understanding of the colonist's in Upper and Lower Canada, and discrimination towards the
French in Lower Canada. Numerous colonists arrived to Upper and Lower Canada to begin a new
life with a proper government however, the government in Canada did not satisfy their needs.
Firstly, the unskilled way the government ran Upper and Lower Canada upset the colonists. This
included a lack of land for the colonists, even though they were promised land when they arrived in
British North America. Settlers were unhappy about land distribution – particularly about the clergy
and crown reserves and the land speculators that were part of the Family Compact. Also, absentee
landlords overpriced and tied up prime land. The settlers were also unhappy that the building of
roadways was hindered by the clergy and crown reserves. The colonists were unhappy with the
government and the "colonists complained loudly about land and roads. Most knew that the Family
Compact was to blame and they did not disguise their anger" (Pg. 66). This meant that the colonists
were aware that the Family Compact was responsible for this problem because they completely
ignored the colonist's complaints and they did not do anything to help them. They could veto any
laws passed by the Assembly and they did; they shut down

Montreal, Lower Canada Case Study
Montreal, Lower Canada, April, 8, 1829
Dear Sincere and Purposeful William Lyon Mackenzie,
As a resident of the Province, Lower Canada; I, Monsieur Antoine Andre Joelle, have heard and
recognize your presence as a strong–willed advocate and reformer, who gives and finds
compassions within the humble people of the Provinces– Lower and Upper Canada.
As a testimony to your righteous character, I beseech your support and inquiry into the affairs of the
French speaking Province of Lower Canada– our Provinces– Lower and Upper– are similar in their
people's needs. The condition of our Province stems from the irregular rule of the Chateau Clique,
the similar rule of the Family Compact in Upper Canada. This 'paltry screen to a rotten government'
(as said by you, Sir Mackenzie, while writing of the Family Compact) of priests, army people and
others have led to a significant loss of representation for both the ordinary people of the ... Show
The discrimination due to our culture, language and opinions, the high taxes on the land and farms
of the French– speaking, and the lack of representation and democracy within the primarily
English– speaking government have fueled the distrust and growing hostile feelings between the
two groups. As well as James Craig and his need to uproot and imprison any who fight for change–
an example being the closing of the newspaper 'Canadien'. These troubles only affect the French–
speaking in Lower Canada and I presume the primary body of Upper Canada is not designated to
pay higher taxes or such, due to the power of the English– speaking. This, my possible supporter– if
you choose– is reason I want change. This inequality is and will be a source for future unrest within
the provinces– I am

1839-Lord Durham's Conflict In Lower Canada
In Lower Canada, the conflict had been divided along linguistic and cultural lines. Within Durham's
report, The Act of Union, and1841 Election. The English and French battled out the ultimate power
control over the new nation, where the lower Canada and the upper Canada became as one. In
Durham's report back in 1839, he came up with two recommendation: union of Upper Canada and
Lower Canada, and a responsible government. "I expected to find a conflict between the
government an the peoples: instead I found two warring nations within a single state; I found a
struggle, not of principles...which now divides the inhabitants of lower Canada into hostile groups:
French and English." Quote from Lore Durham (1839 – Lord Durham's Report). To solve this

The Ethics Of The Law Essay
When it comes to large sums of money, it is not uncommon for the spender to feel they have been
ripped off or become over protected. The practice of law is no exception to this phenomenon, and
crocked lawyers and paralegals have negatively contributed to the notion. On several occasions law
professionals have taken client money for personal use, acting against the law and rules of
professional conduct. Although lawyers and paralegals have their own individual rules and
guidelines to abide by, they follow the same professional structure of proper conduct. The rules of
conduct for paralegals is governed by the Law Society of Upper Canada and is the governing body
responsible for reports of misconduct. Further investigations will lay out the proper procedures and
tasks that must be completed when a paralegal encounters an accusations of misconduct, specifically
when a client accuses a paralegal of misappropriating money from the clients trust fund. When it
comes to possible options it is important to remember that by proactively sending a report of the
circumstance to the Law Society of Upper Canada with a detailed list of events, bookkeeping and
accounts billed to the client will help your case prior to the client reporting you to the Law Society.
Should a paralegal choose to ignore the threat of the client, in hopes that the client will not follow
through with higher involvement, the paralegal will then face an audit by the Law Society. If the
Law Society is apprised that the

Compare And Contrast The American Revolution And The Upper...
The Upper Canada Rebellion was an uprising of "commoners" during 1837–1838 in the Great
Lakes/Ontario area,it was incited by William Lyon Mackenzie(Library and Archives Canada), and
focused on the issues of an oppressive overseas government,lack of representation and land
inequities.However,my research question is, how similar are the American Revolution and the
Upper Canada Rebellion? The American Revolution and the Upper Canada Rebellion are very
similar with a few differences.The American Revolution shares with the Upper Canada Rebellion
the traits of democratic principles,a fight against British rule and the element of being a "home bred"
rebellion,however these rebellions differ in the fact that the Upper Canada Rebellion was highly
centralized. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Whereas the Upper Canada Rebellion was highly centralized on the fact that the "Upper Canadians"
wanted an equal or separate state(Carmen,3),what distances this from the american revolution is the
fact that this was not a national undertaking but a francophone–upper canadian bid for independence
not a "Canadian" one.Although the Upper Canadian Rebellion did call on all people living in Upper
Canada,it really was centralized to the UppeR Canada region,the reason the rebellion stayed so
centralized,is due to both a language barrier and foreign influence in Lower Canada. Lower
Canada,which extends into Quebec was a mostly French area of influence ,with mostly French
language speakers(Library and Archives Canada), this language barrier made for a distinct sense of
division between the Upper Canadian anglophones and the Lower Canadian francophones,this
division made for a distrust of each side,so as a result it was impossible to gain support from the
"opposite" Canada.This differs from the American Revolution because in the American
Revolution,the language barrier was almost nonexistent, and the patriotism was spread throughout
the nation and did not localize itself in only one

Treaty Of Paris Essay
The aboriginals are the first people of Canada they spoke in many languages and each group has its
own name, John Cabot the explorer sails to Canada's east coast and claims it for England but my
1534 Jacques Cartier claims that now the area is known for France. The Treaty of Paris ends seven
years of fighting between France and England. France gives its Canadian settlements to England by
1763. Colonies now known as Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, Ontario and Quebec join to create the
Dominion of Canada. Its government is similar to Britain's and includes a governor–general, who
represents Britain's royalty.by 1867. 1873Canada creates the North–West Mounted Police, now
known as the Royal Canadian Mounted Police or Mounties, to help keep order. ... Show more
In 1841, the act of union the upper and Lower Canada made a one provinces a single provinces a
movement In the 1860s for a larger Canadian federation advanced of the demand for the same
defense, Britain and France had a problem that was needed to find a solution and it was required to
find a solution and they needed a railway system. They called a conference in 1864 the Maritime
Provinces approved the union along themselves and accepted that. The other ministers of the other
provinces attendee the provinces of Canada. Another conference was taken in the same year but this
time in Quebec, the representatives of Canada traveled to London to see and talk to the British
government in 1866 the first people crossed the land bridge that was joined between Asia and North
America to come to Canada they arrived between 15,000 and 30,000 years ago. Leif Eriksson he is
the Viking explorer that entered Newfoundland in Canada in about the A.D. 1000. The British and
France people arrived in Canada and settled their in the 16 century. The framers and the fur traders
had a misunderstanding that lead to the four wars between 1689 and 1763. The Indian and France
War was the last war it was the final war, and British was on control of Canada but the French
control is very strong till

Comparison With The Upper Canada Rebellion
I. Comparison with the Upper Canada Rebellion
A. The Château Clique was the same as the Family Compact
B. Les Patriotes were the same as the reform party.
C. Louis–Joseph Papineau led the Lower Canada Rebellion as William Mackenzie led the Upper
Canada Rebellion.
II. Les patriots complained about the same things as the reformers did in Upper Canada.
A. Most of the Chateau Clique were English.
B. Louis–Joseph Papineau was the leader of Les Patriotes. He wrote the Ninety–two Resolutions in
1834.
1. He stated that the French should have control over the majority of the government.
2. He wanted an American type of democracy.
3. He wanted all government positions to be elected positions.
C. The Château Clique refused to acknowledge the document and instead ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
In early November, a battle broke out in Montreal between the British and the French.
E. On November 23, 1837, the first major battle took place in Saint–Denis, in the Richelieu Valley.
1. Three hundred English soldiers fought against eight hundred Patriotes.
2. The battle lasted for six hours, but because the weapons were not accurate there were few deaths.
3. The soldiers retreated.
F. Two days later, the Patriotes again face a battle with the soldiers in the town of Saint–Charles.
1. There were four hundred twenty soldiers and around two hundred fifty Patriotes.
2. The soldiers surprised the Patriotes by attacking immediately and not waiting for more men. After
two hours of fighting, the order was given to charge with fixed bayonets. The Patriotes did not have
bayonets and so were at a disadvantage.
3. Fifty Patriotes pretended to surrender in order to get close enough for good shots at the soldiers.
They killed one sergeant and wounded several other men. The soldiers were enraged. They killed
large numbers of Patriotes and burned the village.
4. On December 2, the soldiers returned to Saint–Denis and easily captured it.
G. Papineau fled to the US to try to get American support but

Alcoholism In Canada
Canada is one of the best country to live in terms of its social, political, economical and cultural
aspects. The good living condition and the social harmony are the most known description of today's
Canada. The invention of this livable country faced lots of contradictions and problems. The great
development of Canada rely upon its geographical, and environmental features. Besides from these
advantages the economical, and political objectives were correct. From the whole course content, i
have noticed that the unification is the common process in invention of today's Canada. The social,
political, economical and cultural aspects all have some relation with unification process. In other
words, the key for this country's development is unification. ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
There were lots of tavern, and distilleries which encouraged the drinking. Because there was lack of
social welfare venues, the taverns were the venue for communities, organizations, political
meetings, trade and even educational events. Since the tavern is linked to spirits and drunkenness
wrongdoings occur. Drinking was everywhere that started to affect people's life so much.
Prostitution, insanity, poverty and crime increased. "Tavern as a moral hazard to all who entered and
a threat to social peace" 3. As the problem become more, the society began to implement an action
to cut back the alcoholism by building the "Temperance Movement"–the longest and successful
social movements in history. The drinking culture was more of a working class culture that the
Temperance Movement members were mostly white, middle class white women. One of the
successful union was Women's Christian Temperance Union established in 1874. Even though the
they did not win the campaign of prohibiting alcoholic beverages right away, their legislation
approved later. According to Peter DeLottinville's article "Joe Beef of Montreal: Working–Class
Culture and the Tavern, 1869–1889", the culture of Joe Beef tavern reached its own limits4. The
movement created communities and acted as a whole. They held lectures, meetings, concerts, and
picnics. The organization own newspapers, songs, poems, slogans so that they can reach the
community to prevent, to remind, and to encourage people to stop drinking. Many people stopped
drinking and the society began to be cleared. The union of people helped improve the society. The
government also started to take action by implementing tax, police inspection in taverns, reducing
the distilleries and tighten up the law by granting license to liquor sellers 5. The state regulators and
activists effort paid

Why Did I Choose George Etienne Cartier
Introduction
Why did I choose George Etienne Cartier?
For my heritage fair I decided to research George Etienne Cartier, who if you haven't heard about
was a lawyer, rebel, politician and railway promoter whose contributions to Confederation were on
the same level as figures like John A. Macdonald and George Brown(Sweeny). If you haven't heard
of any of these people, then don't worry I'll be going into length on all of them, but I'll make sure to
focus from the perspective of George Cartier. Furthermore, if you were wondering why I chose this
topic to research, I would truthfully tell you that the only reason I chose "George Etienne Cartier"
was because he was as good a topic as anything else, so personally I didn't care about the topic. ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
George had 7 siblings and was the seventh child of his parents(Bonenfant), I didn't research much
about his siblings but I did find that one of George's brothers also went into law and was a partner of
Georges during the time he practiced law(Bonenfant). As you can tell probably tell from the name,
George Etienne Cartier came from French background and lived in Lower Canada which was
mainly French, he came from a relatively wealthy family of grain exporters and millers(Sweeny).
Which possibly influenced his views towards Confederation after the repeal of the Corn Laws, but
that's a subject for later, when we understand more about George's involvement with Confederation.
Another thing that could have influenced George about Confederation was that the fact that he was
born around the same time as the War of 1812, which again is a subject for later. As we know
George came from a wealthy family, which allowed him to live a relatively comfortable life, it also
allowed him to be able to access educational opportunities. He studied at the Sulpician College of
Montreal, afterwards he studied law and politics(Sweeny), he was also able to learn more about law
while working under Edouard Rodier, a Montreal Lawyer who was involved with various rebel
groups in Lower Canada(Bonenfant). While studying to become a lawyer, George Cartier almost
certainly was exposed to the

Canadian Confederation Essay
In the year of 1867 the nation we know as Canada came into being. The Confederation in this year
only came about after things had been overcome. Many political and economic pressures were
exerted on the colonies and a federal union of the colonies seemed to be the most practical method
of dealing with these pressures and conflicts. While Confederation was a solution to many of the
problems, it was not a popular one for all the colonies involved. In the Maritime colonies views
differed widely on the topic. Some were doubtful, some were pleased, others were annoyed and
many were hopeful for a prosperous future.1
It was the initiative of the Maritime Provinces that first created the concept of union. Leaders of
Prince Edward Island, New ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
By 1865 Prince Edward Island had turned down the Confederation plan.
The people of Newfoundland were no more enthusiastic about the idea of a large Union.
Newfoundland had always maintained close ties with Britain, having more in common with them
than the people in Western Canada. Although the pro–Confederation people argued that financial
benefits for the struggling fisheries would result, most Newfoundlanders could not understand how
that could happen, instead they feared heavy taxes and an involvement in a possible battle between
Canada and the United States. The Newfoundland government did not even bring the Confederation
idea to vote. Newfoundland would maintain its status quo.
If the Maritime colonies had been able to isolate themselves, they could have lived contentedly for a
long period of time, but other pressures would force Maritimers to reconsider Confederation. One of
these outside pressures was the support Great Britain was giving to this idea of Confederation in
British North America. Great Britain no longer wanted to be concerned with nor did they wish to
provide the financial assistance to support Canada in any war.
By the 1860's railways were being hailed as an answer to economic problems. Those people in the
Maritimes who supported Confederation argued that a transcontinental railway would improve
among the colonies and would also help to unify the country. Goods could be moved much

War of 1812 Essay
The War of 1812 was a war between Britain and the United States fought primarily in Upper
Canada. It had many causes, few which involved British North America. The results of the war
include the fact that there was no clear winner or loser among them. The only real losers in the
situation were the Natives in the region. They were driven out of their lands and customs. None of
the borders was changed by the war, though many attempts were made. The Treaty of Ghent, which
ended the war, did nothing to advance the state of the countries. It went so far as to end the war and
put things back the way that they were, but the main causes of the conflict were not addressed or
dealt with. In order to evaluate the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He was valiant in protecting his people and led them courageously in battle; even though he did not
have to engage in the fighting himself, he joined his troops. He was killed in the Battle of Moravian
town on 5 October 1813. After his death, survivors retreated and later signed a cease–fire with the
Americans. Another highly regarded individual as a result is Laura Secord. When she overheard
American soldiers, she rushed to tell someone in charge of the British force. On the way, she came
across Natives who blocked the oncoming troops. Because of her dangerous trek, the Americans
were turned away at Beaver Dam.
With the American offences being stopped, and heroic men coming forth, Canadian nationalism was
on the rise. Since most of the war had been fought in Upper Canada, retaining of the vast majority
was as much a moral victory as a material one. The end of the war brought significant immigration
from the United States into Upper and Lower Canada. Canadians resented this because they still
regarded Americans as the enemy. Being banded together in the War of 1812 forced the people of
the Canadas to feel as though they were a unified nation. The English–speaking Canadians could
better understand the French–speaking Canadians and vice

Teenage Rebellion Research Paper
The Similarities and Differences of the Causes of the
Rebellion in Upper and Lower Canada
The causes of the Rebellions of 1837 in Upper and Lower Canada have similarities and differences.
For example, both Upper and Lower Canada had problems with their government, not having a
representative or responsible one. They also both had a group, the Family Compact in Upper Canada
and the Chateau Clique in Lower Canada, that had a lot of money and power. Another similarity is
that they both had a document trying for change that got shut down by the government, Gourlay's
petition in Upper Canada, and the 92 Resolutions in Lower Canada. The proposed union of 1822
also contributed to the Rebellions of 1837 in both Upper and Lower Canada, as both they
disapproved of union of the two colonies. The proposed union of 1822 could also be considered a
difference in the causes of the rebellions, since the union would make the French in Lower Canada,
a ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Firstly, the government in both Upper and Lower Canada both were neither representative nor
responsible, it was an oligarchy. Even though 'anyone' (landowning men) could have been elected as
part of the Legislative Assembly, the Legislative Assembly only could suggested ideas. Any
suggestions could be vetoed by the councils or the governor, who were all appointed by Britain,
making the assembly ultimately have no power in the government. This was a huge issue because
the councils were mostly made up of the Family Compact (in Upper Canada) and the Chateau
Clique (in Lower Canada). Which leads to the second similarity of the causes, the power structures,
the Family Compact and the Chateau Clique. Both of these upper class groups wanted different
things than the lower classes. An example is that the Family Compact wanted to build canals instead
of roads and the Chateau Clique wanted the

Canada And Ireland Essay
Canada, Ireland, The United States, Australia and New Zealand are
So, important countries that most of us do not know a lot about and it is so, important to know if
these countries were strong as it is now from the beginning of its history we will first, talk about
Canada.
Canada was discovered in 1534 by Jacques Cartier, when he
And his European friend first reached Canada they found it occupied people called Inuit and Metis
they were Indians so, they though that they had reached the West Indies. These Native people of
Canada spoke two main languages Algonquin and Iroquoian; they are greatly distinct language
groups however, these two languages were separated only by Saint Lawrence River. These
Canadians followed lots of religion the most influence ones were Native Spirituality, Sikh,
Zoroastrian, and Christians. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In 1971. The British government though of a solution that could solve this problem, the solution was
splitting Canada into two parts Upper and Lower Canada. Upper Canada was for the English
Protestant and the Lower Canada was for the French Catholic. A member of the British parliament
called Durham was given order to investigate the problems caused by splitting Canada. In 1839
Durham sent the report arguing two major points
First, Upper and Lower Canada should be reunited, British immigration should be encouraged.
Second, Canada should be given the right to rule itself and still be a part of the British Empire to
protect its interest against the United

The War of 1812 and Canadian History
The War of 1812 was an influential event, which marks its place in Canadian history. The heroic
efforts of Canadians helped to define who they are, determine what side of the border they live on,
and the flag they salute today. Therefore, The War of 1812 is the most significant historical event
that lay down the foundation for a nation. It united segregated colonies, secured borders with a
strong militia, and achieved the fundamental objective of defense.
Firstly, many groups of colonies worked in isolation because of different incentives. However
during the War of 1812, the small communities from different locations of British North America
united, securing relations. Prior to the war, many settlers in Upper Canada did not feel loyal to Great
Britain. Some were United Empire Loyalists, who had arrived from the North after the American
Revolution and believed that they would support and fight alongside with the Americans instead of
British North America. Others were American and had felt no connection towards the Crown. But
when the declaration for the war was given, both Upper and Lower Canada united and came
together collectively to fight against a common enemy, for the sake of their land. The Montreal
Gazette editor reports on the entire population of the city coming together to defend its frontier:
"All classes of individuals ... have flown to the standard, with the determination of supporting their
national character, and defending their country from the unhallowed

War Of 1812 Dbq Essay
The War of 1812 was a military conflict between the United States and Great Britain. Causes of the
war included British attempts to restrict U.S. trade, the Royal Navy's impressment of American
seamen and America's desire to expand its territory. The war began on July 12, 1812, when
American General William Hull invaded Upper Canada with a force of 2000 men. He then issued
propaganda to try to convince the population not to oppose the invasion.
However, the War of 1812 is important for Canadians to understand; because in Canada, the war
contributed to a growing sense of national identity. The war united the French–speaking and
English–speaking colonies against the Americans, giving many citizens a sense of nationhood as
well as a sense

Unity And Conflict In Canada
Canada
In lots of ways unity and conflict were themes in Canada. Conflict in Canada was showed largely in
the rebellion and French and Indian War. The French speakers in lower Canada were lead into
rebellion by Papineau and the English speakers in upper Canada by Mackinzie. The French and
Indian War was a war between longtime rivals France and British in North America. It started at the
Ohio River Valley. The causes for the war were past rivalry, competition in fur trade, rival native
allies, and land disputes. The French and Indian War was called the 7 year war, it started in 1754.
NAFTA and the mounties help with the Unity in Canada. The NAFTA is the North American Free
Trade Agreement. This made trading free for the USA , Mexico and Canada.

How Was Canada West Formed
Canada West
By Eric H, Eric W and Rachel N.
How was Canada West formed?
Originally, there was no Canada West until February, 1841, when the Act of Union was proclaimed.
The Act of Union was suggested by Lord Durham, a wealthy politician who was sent to investigate
the troubles in Lower and Upper Canada (Lower Canada became Canada East, Upper Canada
became Canada West). The Canadas had various uprisings concerning the fact that they wanted a
Responsible Government. When Lord Durham got back to Britain, he gave the famous Durham
Report. He said that the Canadas should be granted a responsible government, and that they should
be unified into one. Durham wanted the Canadas to be united in hopes of the English–speaking
Canada West assimilating ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
George Brown wanted true representation by population. The current situation was that both
Canadas had the same amount of seats in the parliament, but both Canadas also couldn't agree on
anything, leading to little decisions being made. They couldn't agree because Canada West was
English–speaking while Canada East was French–speaking, and the decisions that had to be made
affected both Canadas. Therefore, they both had different opinions. So in the end, George Brown
joined a coalition (an alliance that is made to get things done) with John A. Macdonald (Canada
West) and George Étienne Cartier (Canada East) to form the Dominion of Canada (established July
1st 1867). In the end, George Brown's idea, true representation by population, became the form of
government that Canada uses

Compare The State Of The Upper Canada During The Era Of...
During the era of Pre–Confederation Canada, Upper Canadians and Lower Canadians showed very
different views on the state of Canada. Notably, Upper Canadians struggled to hold fast to social
class, down–right refusing to remove barriers of social class in order to remain within the
jurisdiction of the privileges of Britain. Consequently, a common view on the country at the time
wasn't that of Canada – an individual colony on its own, but as a wasteland to be conquered. Hence,
Upper Canada was focused on construction and urban development, rather than industry. Lower
Canadians on the other hand were focused more on industry. Compared to Upper Canadians, there
weren't common reports of classism, seeming to adapt easier to co–operating with their

Canadian Success During The War Of 1812
Canadian Success in the War of 1812 The War of 1812 is a war that stemmed from the Napoleonic
wars in Europe into North America. It is a result of conflict between America and Britain and is now
something that has left a mark on both American and Canadian history. For the Americans it is
something that they are ashamed of and tend not to think about too much, but for the Canadians it
has much more meaning. Some historians believe that this event, this success, is what sent Canada
on its way to separating from Britain and becoming its own nation. The success of Canada in this
war can be attributed to the leadership abilities of men such as Sir Isaac Brock and Tecumseh, the
unity of Upper and Lower Canada as well as the need and want to fight on the behalf of citizens of
these colonies. The good leadership, the unity of the colonies and the desire to defend themselves
are the reasons for Canada's success in the defense of their homeland and the defeat of the
Americans in the War of 1812. The leadership abilities of the Canadian military men are what truly
inspired the colonies of Upper and Lower Canada in the battle against America. In particular Sir
Isaac Brock and Tecumseh were two men who, through both their courage and battle tactics
encouraged and inspired the fight in the citizens in both colonies. Sir Isaac Brock was the
commander of the British forces in Canada at the time of the war and was not entirely happy with
his position in Canada due to the fact that he

American Influence On Upper Canada
American Influence on Upper Canada: Pre 1812
Upper Canada was created in 1791 to accommodate the Loyalist refugees and land–hunting farmers
of the United States after the American Revolution. In addition of the existing two colonies, a third
colony was created by diving the Province of Quebec into Lower Canada which resides in the east
and Upper Canada which resides in the west. The colony was made official by the British
Parliament in the Constitution Act of 1791. Afterwards, the colonies became populated with pre–
dominantly American inhabitants and their French–speaking counterpart. Consequently, it was
difficult for Upper Canada to merge with these two different cultures, but proven otherwise when
the dualism between French culture and American ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Civil Law of England was formally introduced into Upper Canada in 1792 (Riddell 165). Their
law greatly differed and was based on their autonomous ego. In Riddell's 1915 journal The Duel in
Early Canada, Blackstone comments the practice of English Civil Law by the Loyalist as "where
both parties meet avowedly with an intent to murder thinking it their duty as gentlemen, and
claiming as their right to wanton with their own lives those of their fellow creatures, without any
warrant or authority from a power either divine or human, but in the direct contradiction to the laws
of God and man" (Riddell 165). This signifies that the intention of the Loyalist were crude and
irresponsible. They did it out of their egotistic notions. This explains why the political standpoint of
Canada was poor during the War of 1812. The Democratic Republican party did not prepare the
country sufficiently for the war and limited the nation's chances for success (Tucker 3). Canada was
against the participation in the war and wanted to remain neutral. Either way, America threated to
attack and made Canada an unwanted third party victim. The Democratic Republican distrusted
expansive government and feared standing along military establishment (3). The English Civil Law
ended up dividing the country than bring it together. In addition, certain contents of the English

Equality In Upper Canada Essay
Equality is a principle that must be adopted in order for individuals to live harmoniously amongst
one another in society. The LGBT+ is a community of people that consist of Lesbians, Gays,
Bisexuals, Transsexuals, and more. Based on their sexual orientation, LGBT+ people are victims of
ongoing hate, prejudice, and bigotry due to their different, but natural characteristics. Discrimination
aimed towards the LGBT+ community continues to be a present issue in the modern day.
Intolerance towards the group evidently remains as they continue to be excluded in society through
acts of assault, stereotype, and mockery. Due to such belittling forms of harm, the LGBT+ people
are compelled to remain closeted to avoid receiving ridicule from society. This ... Show more
Law Society of Upper Canada encounters the conflicting interest of religious freedom and equality.
The parties involved in the case are Trinity Western University (TWU) and the Law Society of
Upper Canada (LSUC). Trinity Western University sought accreditation for its proposed law school
but was rejected by the Law Society of Upper Canada, who possesses the ability to deliver
accreditation for law schools due to its licensing process. TWU is a post–secondary school in British
Columbia, whose principles are based on an Evangelical Christian concept. TWU's code of conduct
is strictly pertinent towards the beliefs and traditions of the religion, including discerning
disapproval towards same–sex relations, and sexual relations outside of marriage. The covenant
discourages students from participating in sexual activities that contravene the sacred bond between
a married man and woman. TWU's religious principles are evident in the university's community
covenant which implies that students of the university must behave according to the teachings of the
Evangelical Christian religion. TWU does not necessarily preclude LGBT+ members from applying
and admitting to the school, in fact,

Responsible Government: The Rebellions In Lower Canada
Responsible Government:
A responsible government is a government that is responsible to the people. this means that the
government is dependent on the support of the people by election assembly instead of going by
monarchy. Lower Canada Rebellions
The Rebellions in Lower Canada were against the Roman catholic Church and the british
Government who both had large amounts of power over the French. The Rebellion was led by Louis
Joseph Papineau and the Patriotes. He published the Ninety–Two Resolutions which were a list of
demands for political reforms and improvements. They wanted a responsible government, but it was
rejected in London then was followed by an economic depression of French Canadian farmers in the
1830's. In the rebellion ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Durham report was the output when Lord Durham was sent to lower Canada to investigate the
rebellions in upper and lower canada. The report of it was called the Durham report, the report
suggested that the two provinces combine into one. The combination would make it a english
speaking majority to control the forces of the french and it would allow a safe entry for a responsible
government. When the report got to Britain the union was agreed by the responsible government
was not. The terms of the union was that there would be one represented parliament, the ban of
french language from government officials and naturally there were opposition from both sides,
upper and lower canada. Even though there was issues both provinces agreed and worked with the
terms and the union. In the end more money and the economy improved and a responsible
government

The Causes for the Rebellion of 1837-1838 Essay
The Causes for the Rebellion of 1837–1838
The rebellions of Upper and Lower Canada were in the interests of self–government but were
doomed to failure from their beginning. Each of these two colonies encountered a great deal of
problems right from the institution of the Constitution Act of 1791 and the problems continually got
worse until the only choice to some seem to be rebellion. There were several problems that lead to
the rebellions of 1837–38. In Lower Canada there was the agricultural crisis that caused a large
number of starvations, to the French and English political and social problems within the colony.
There were several different reasons that caused the rebellion in Upper Canada but these caused
were mainly rooted in ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The next major issue was that of immigration which brought tens of millions of people from Europe.
These people would be heading to the United States, Upper Canada or Lower Canada. When these
immigrants came they would land in Quebec and with them they would bring disease that killed a
large amount of French Canadians. This aggravated the French people because "they saw this as a
plot of the English to get rid of the French Canadians". Adding to these problems was the
establishment of the British America Land Company. This new land company was given over 500
acres of Lower Canada's prime land. The company would not allow French people to buy this land;
only the English and Americans could purchase the land. The French people found it increasingly
difficult to get land and the government wasn't doing anything about this. All of these problems lead
to the assembly issuing the ninety–two resolutions that had two main points that were responsible
government and control of money. The ruling English class didn't want the French people to gain
this power because they wanted to French to remain oppressed and out of the upper class "The
Chateau Clique in Lower Canada wanted to prevent the French from winning complete control over
the government and English speaking people would be under the control of the French." The
response to the ninety–two resolutions was the issuing of the ten resolutions from Britain that stated
that there would be no

Cause and Effect: The Canadian Rebellions of 1837 and 1838.
The research in this proposal primarily focuses on the rebellions that took place in both upper and
Lower Canada during 1838. The time line of this proposal will include events prior to the actual
rebellions as they are significant to the understanding of the causes of these uprisings. In 1837 and
1838, insurrections against the British colonial government arose in Lower and Upper Canada.
Moderates hoped to reform the political system, while radicals yearned for a restructuring of both
administration and society (Read , 19–21). During this time period an economic crisis had swept
both Upper and Lower Canada. In Lower Canada many French habitants were suffering from
famine and the accumulation of huge debts due to poor harvests. In Upper ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
At the end of the rebellion, in search for the causes the British parliament send Lord Durham who
plays a significant role in shaping Canada's political culture (Read, 67).
The most important aspect of this proposal deals with the aftermath of the Canadian insurrections.
This will be of extreme to significance to the reader as the aftermath of the rebellion would change
the destiny of Canada. After learning of the uprisings in the Canadian colonies the British parliament
sent a commission to study the causes. Lord Durham was named governor on May of 1839 and was
in placed in charge of establishing an inquiry into the rebellions. From this inquiry came a list of
recommendations submitted to the parliament in London (Outlett, 275). Two recommendations in
this report became extremely significant to Canadian history.
The first recommendation would later become known as 'responsible government'. The colonial
governor would have to choose the executive council from elected member of the majority party in
the Legislative. As well the governor would have to abide by the general wishes of the elected
assembly. The practice of responsible was not put into effect until 1841 but Durham's
recommendations would be the start of reform to the British colonial rule in the Canada's. This
reform was a major step towards Canadian confederation in 1867 (Greer, 135.).
The second recommendation was the Uniting of the Two Canadian

What Was The Role Of Confederation In Canada
Canada was rushed into Confederation way too soon and has had problems due to this. Although
through these past hundred fifty years, Canada has survived and is still going strong. Confederation
started on July 1st, 1867 when three British Colonies came together to become four provinces.
Although Canada went through Confederation, it is not a confederate association; it is a federal state
which is not the supposed meaning of Confederation. Canada has evolved majorly since
Confederation back in 1867.
Before confederation, British North America was made up of many colonies controlled by Britain.
These colonies were Canada, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island, Newfoundland,
Vancouver Island and British Columbia. British North America ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
New France was an established colony created by France along the St. Lawrence River.It was
founded in 1534 by Jacques Cartier. In New France's one hundred and fifty years as a french colony
of British North America, no more than 10,000 people immigrated there. New France faced many
difficulties, some being with the Aboriginals and later with the British. In 1663 New France became
a legitimate province of France.
The idea of confederation had been around and mentioned for years. In September 1864, they
discussed the idea of confederation at a conference in Charlottetown. The conference brought
together the people of Prince Edward Island, New Brunswick and Nova Scotia to discuss the union
of their three provinces. The Conference was organized by these maritime provinces to try to help
persuade the idea of confederation. On September 8th, 1864, to conclude his speech Honourable
Thomas H. Haviland spoke: "I believe, from all that I can learn that the Provinces will, ere long, be
one great country or nation, from the Pacific to the Atlantic. Never before was there such an
important meeting as this held in the history of British America; and it may yet be said that here, in
little Prince Edward Island, was that Union formed which has produced one of the greatest nations
on the face of God's earth." However the conference went undecided on a conclusion which led to
the Quebec

Changes In Canada In The 19th Century
The country that we have come to call Canada, has been built and shaped by wars, and military
confrontations. In the 19th century, Canada had many conflicts that helped change and make
Canada, some of which are: The War of 1812, Rebellions of 1838, The Fenian Raids and the Red
River Rebellion. These obstacles presented, threatened the security, defense and the stability of
Canada, which was a British colony(I feel that this does not make sense). Canada relied almost
exclusively on the militia, which was composed of ordinary citizens and not a professional standing
army. Although, the militia did provide basic defense, they were not qualified enough. However,
there was a growing sentiment between the citizens of Canada. One sentiment proposed ... Show
The objective of the brotherhood was to free Ireland from Great Britain by attacking Canada, A
British colony(who were the british colonie). The Battle of Ridgeway in 1866, between the
Canadian militia and the Fenians, was the greatest test to the militia to see the strength, organization,
and most importantly, was the militia the Canada's greatest defense? The battle was a complete
disaster for the militia, which was made up mostly of a Canadian militia force. Granatstien argues,
"militia had no administrative organization to provide shelter or food for the called up troops, and
the men had to beg for assistance" and going on and saying that the militia was "deficient in nearly
everything except enthusiasm". The first test, for the militia is to actually take on a defense task by
themselves, without the British army, which was a complete failure. This battle strongly submits that
the militia is actually just a myth and not the best defense for Canada. Furthermore, the militia was
flawed, the Fenians feared the British regulars more than the militia. When the Fenians heard "the
British troops were drawing near... the enemy successfully made its way back on the American side
of the line." The British army was the genuine defense of Canada not the

Mr. Butt
Stephen Butler Leacock (1869–1944) is a Canadian author. He will long be remembered for his
best–selling book Sunshine Sketches of a Little Town (1912) as well as the numerous awards and
honours he received during his illustrious lifetime as author, professor, lecturer and humourist.
Leacock published Literary Lapses in 1910, with the financial assistance of his brother George. It is
a best–of compilation of his previously published writings. It sold out quickly and propelled
Leacock into being known as one of the most popular authors in the English–speaking world. In
1911, Leacock 's collection of parodies, Nonsense Novels successfully followed. 1912 saw the
release of Leacock 's satirical masterpiece, Sunshine Sketches of a Little Town. ... Show more
We read: "Whatever people appear to desire it or not" and we no longer suppose him to be
thoughtful enough to be somebody's shoulder on time, but not just all the time.
As we all are used to find bad things in a person as soon as we said he is not very perfect at all, I
will not reject such a unconscious "approach" to interpreting any man's personality. So, seeking for
some intolerant and pushy stuff to collect we can easily find the examples. He seemed to be very
boastful about what he did, and even about what he was going to do, I guess: "My dear fellow," said
Mr. Butt, "I only wish I could. I wish I had the time. I am sure it would cheer you up immensely if I
could. But I 'm just going out." And unfortunately, to hear him speak, you'd think he is boastful
about the things he shouldn't be so boastful. "I can easily find it" he said about the way he is going
to find a house of his friends, as he used to tell us. And to our great surprise we read further: "I 've a
very simple system for finding a house at night by merely knocking at the doors in the neighborhood
till I get it." And it almost scares us, as we all know that it is very intolerant to do so. So Mr. Butt
started his pleasant full of benevolence trip. It is nonsense to us, how spineless were all those people
he disturbed! He said:"I had to knock at twenty houses at least to get it" and we are laughing through
the tears at him.
Analyzing the night at the

Stephen Leacock
Stephen Leacock
Born in Swanmore, England, Stephen Leacock was one of 11 children of an unsuccessful farmer and
an ambitious mother, a woman to whom Leacock no doubt owed his energetic and status–conscious
nature. In 1891, while teaching at the prestigious Upper Canada College in Toronto, Leacock
obtained a modern language degree from the University of Toronto. In 1903, after receiving a Ph.D.
in political economy from the University of Chicago, he joined the staff of McGill University,
Montreal, as professor of politics and economics. Leacock's career as a humorist began when he had
some comic pieces published as Literary Lapses in 1910. This successful book was followed by two
more books of comic sketches, Nonsense Novels (1911) and ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The son who wandered forth in the world was either killed by the cannibals or crawled home years
afterwards doubled up with rheumatism. So the old men made the proverb. But nowadays it is
exactly wrong. It is the rolling stone that gathers the moss. It is the ambitious boy from Honkville,
Indiana, who trudges off to the city leaving his elder brother in the barnyard and who later makes a
fortune and founds a university. While his elder brother still has only the old farm with three cows
and a couple of pigs, he has a whole department of agriculture with great sheds–full of Tamworth
hogs and a professor to every six of them.
In short, in modern life it is the rolling stone that gathers the moss. And the geologists––outside of
Tennessee––say that the moss on the actual stone was first started in exactly the same way. It was
the rolling of the stone that smashed up the earth and made the moss grow.
Take another proverb:
All is not Gold that Glitters
How perfectly ridiculous! Everybody in the days in which we live knows––even a child knows––
that all is gold that glitters. Put on clothes enough, appearance enough and you will be accepted
anywhere. Just do a little glittering and everybody will think you are gold. Make a show, be a
humbug, and you will succeed so fast that presently, being very wealthy and prominent, you will
really think yourself a person of great merit and intellect. In other words, the glitter makes the gold.
That is all there is to it.

Upper Houses In Canada
Thirdly, the structure of the Canadian parliament is not the only method that can be used. Types of
reforms that have been proposed have been based off of other country upper house configurations.
Those countries have shown working alternative ways of how to separate powers over the legislative
bodies. The Federal Republic of Germany has an alternative approach to federalism which differs to
that of Canada and so does the United States of America. Those two countries have been very
successful with their unique forms of parliament and offer an alternative structure to what Canada
currently has.
The history of the formation of upper houses in certain countries comes with the necessity to correct
the injustices of their pasts. The institutional ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Bundesrat is a body within the German government that represents the interests of the
individual states and thus acts as a link between the Federation and the federal states. The Bundesrat
is made up of appointed representatives of the federal state government with each state given a
certain amount of votes in regards to their population. In total there are 69 seats with each Lander
given between three to six seats. (Reuter 2009, pg. 17) The Bundesrat democratic legitimacy comes
from the fact that its state governments are elected and thus those appointed to the Bundesrat were
theoretically chosen by the people. Thus to be a member of the Bundesrat the person must have a
role in the government at the federal state level. The Bundesrat does not need to pass every bill, but
rather is only required to provide approval to bills if they directly affect the Lander and currently
almost 50% of all bills passed need the approval of the Bundesrat. (U.S. Library of Congress) The
Bundesrat can reject appeal laws to Federal matters, but the Bundestag can overrule those objections
by having the same majority as in the Bundesrat who rejected it. Review and discussion over the
proposals submitted by the Federal government are two of the Bundesrat's main responsibilities
which portray its checks and balances role in the federal government. If an agreement can not be
made between the two chambers, then a Joint Conference Committee is created to resolve any
differences and create a bill that has been passed by a majority in each chamber. The Bundesrat has
a total of 16 committees who are are given certain undertakings in regards to their areas of
knowledge and experience. (Reuter 2009, pg. 25) The Bundesrat only has six weeks to consider a
bill so the work in the Bundesrat is generally done

The Causes Of Canadian Confederation
Canadian confederation was a process in which the British colonies of Canada, Nova Scotia, and
New Brunswick were united into one government of Canada, on July 1 1867. However Canadian
confederation did not just happen like that there were causes that lead to confederation. The causes
which lead to confederation are; political deadlock, American civil war, the railway, cancellation of
reciprocity treaty, and Britain creating her colonies self–sufficient. So today in this essay I will be
discussing about the causes of confederation.
The political deadlock was an act to join two colonies and to give a representative voice as well as
some of Upper Canada's debt's. In 1840 the union joined two colonies; upper Canada (Ontario) and
lower Canada (Quebec) to form a single colony. However both upper Canada and lower Canada
were given equal representation which was 42 seats each. Slowly upper Canada began to grow
larger than lower Canada. When this was being done there were more Quebec representatives than
Canadian representatives living in the colony. However it advantaged the Canadian's who had less
people but equal say. By the 1860s, the situation had changed as Quebec having less people but
equal say. Now since Canada and Quebec had equal say all they did was turn each other down
which resulted into not a lot of new bills that were passed by Canada. The outcome of this was that
the politicians from Quebec and Ontario look towards a new political system. However one

George Etienne Cartier 's Legacy And Contributions
For my heritage fair I decided to research George Etienne Cartier, who if you haven't heard about
was a lawyer, rebel, politician and railway promoter whose contributions to Confederation were on
the same level as figures like John A. Macdonald and George Brown(Sweeny). If you haven't heard
of any of these people, then don't worry I'll be going into length on all of them. Furthermore, if you
were wondering why I chose this topic to research, I would truthfully tell you that the only reason I
chose "George Etienne Cartier" was because he was as good a topic as anything else, so personally I
didn't care about the topic. But as I put more research into the topic I came to realize just how
important George Etienne Cartier was to Canada. Not just in his efforts towards Confederation but
also the work he put into preserving French culture and identity in Canada to railway development.
Of course this isn't as exciting as many other topics, but without George Cartier's legacy and
contributions we would most likely not be where we are today. In this report I will be covering the
life of George Etienne Cartier, including his early life, background, political life before and after
Confederation.
Early Life and Rebellions
How did George Etienne Cartier grow up?
George Etienne Cartier was born on September 6th 1814 in Saint–Antoine sur Richelieu to parents
Jacques Cartier (not the explorer) and Marguerite Paradis. George had 7 siblings and was the
seventh child of his

Canadian Culture Vs American Culture Essay
Canada is a diverse country. From its tundras to its cities, different peoples and animals thrive, and
an assortment of foods can be tasted. Canada also makes a great tourist destination. It is surprising
that even though it borders the United States, it is still a completely separate country. Canada was
discovered by the Viking Leif Erikson in the year one thousand. After exploring Greenland, he
discovered Newfoundland, an island off the main Canadian coast. Later, in the 1540s, the French
explorer Jacques Cartier explored the St. Lawrence River that cuts through Canada. This exploration
expanded until Cartier had established French control over Canada. However, England also claimed
parts of Canada for itself. Throughout the sixteenth to seventeenth centuries, France and England
contiuned to take Canadian territory for themselves. The French and Indian War, which ended in
1763, forced the French to give up their territory to England. The British wanted to avoid rebellion,
so they divided Canada into upper and lower Canada, the upper being more English and the lower
being more French. However, much conflict was occurring between the two provinces, so the
British reunited them into one colony again, hoping that this would eliminate the French culture of
the country (Frances 85). Even ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
French and English are the two official languages, with 60% of Canadians speaking English, and
23% speaking French. The remaining 17% speak a variety of other languages. There are also a
variety of religions in Canada, with Christianity being the most followed one, making up 72% of
Canada's religions. 16% of Canada professes to have no religion. The remaining percentage contains
other religions, such as Islam and Hinduism (Choquette 375). Canada is home to many aboriginal
groups as well, such as the Inuits, Iroquois, and the Algonquin

Similarities Between The Great Migration And The Rebellion...

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Adriana Wilson

More from Adriana Wilson (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Similarities Between The Great Migration And The Rebellion...