1) A clinical study tested the efficacy of a tongue gel and tongue cleaner in reducing oral malodor over 7 days.
2) Measurements of volatile sulfur compounds using gas chromatography and organoleptic ratings showed that using the tongue gel with the tongue cleaner was most effective in reducing oral malodor both short-term and long-term.
3) Mechanical tongue cleaning alone was not as effective, highlighting the importance of tongue coating removal for both oral malodor reduction and oral hygiene.
Topical Fluorides- Professionally applied & Self appliedDrSusmita Shah
An overview of Topical Fluorides. Includes mechanism of action of topical application of fluorides- professionally and self applied. Recommendations of use of Fluorides in pediatric dentistry.
Here is a trusted brand with a range flavours in their oral care products that keeps your smile bright and clean. It also protects your mouth from bacteria and germs!
Topical Fluorides- Professionally applied & Self appliedDrSusmita Shah
An overview of Topical Fluorides. Includes mechanism of action of topical application of fluorides- professionally and self applied. Recommendations of use of Fluorides in pediatric dentistry.
Here is a trusted brand with a range flavours in their oral care products that keeps your smile bright and clean. It also protects your mouth from bacteria and germs!
Can Chemical Mouthwash Agents Achieve Plaque or Gingivitis Control- ppt by Al...Alternate Presentations
Can Chemical Mouthwash Agents Achieve Plaque or Gingivitis Control- ppt by Alternate6#
CONTENT
Introduction
Abstract
Chemical Plaque Control
Ideal Properties
Ingredients used in mouthwash
Evidence
Summary
References
INTRODUCTION
• Oral health is important since the mouth is the gateway to the human body. Bacteria are always present in the oral cavity and when not frequently removed the dental plaque biofilm leads to the development of oral disease.
• Over the past decades, the use of mouthwashes has become customary, usually following mechanical plaque biofilm control.
• Although people in industrialized countries use various oral hygiene products with the expectation of an oral health benefit, it is important that sufficient scientific evidence exists to support such claims.
• This meta-review summarized and appraised the current state of evidence that was based on systematic reviews, with respect to the efficacy of various active ingredients of over-the-counter chemotherapeutic mouthwash formulations for plaque control and managing gingivitis.
• Evidence suggests that a mouthwash containing chlorhexidine (CHX) is the first choice. The most reliable alternative for plaque control is essential oil (EO). No difference between CHX and EO with respect to gingivitis was observed.
ABSTRACT
What is the effect of a mouthwash containing various active chemical ingredients on plaque control and managing gingivitis in adults based on evidence gathered from existing systematic reviews? The summarized evidence suggests that mouthwashes containing chlorhexidine(CHX) and essential oils (EO) had a large effect supported by a strong body of evidence. Also there was strong evidence for a moderate effect of cetylpyridinium chloride(CPC).
Evidence suggests that a CHX mouthwash is the first choice, the most reliable alternative is EO. No difference between CHX and EO with respect to gingivitis was observed.
EVIDENCE
There is strong evidence in support of the efficacy of both CHX and EO that have a large beneficial effect on plaque reduction and a moderate effect on gingivitis. There is also strong evidence in support of the efficacy of CPC, which has a moderate beneficial effect on both plaque and gingivitis scores. There is moderate evidence for a small effect of ALX and for a large effect of TCL when used as prerinse before toothbrushing. Weak evidence emerged for small or indistinct effects of HEX, OA, SAN, and SnF2.
Can Chemical Mouthwash Agents Achieve Plaque or Gingivitis Control- ppt by Al...Alternate Presentations
Can Chemical Mouthwash Agents Achieve Plaque or Gingivitis Control- ppt by Alternate6#
CONTENT
Introduction
Abstract
Chemical Plaque Control
Ideal Properties
Ingredients used in mouthwash
Evidence
Summary
References
INTRODUCTION
• Oral health is important since the mouth is the gateway to the human body. Bacteria are always present in the oral cavity and when not frequently removed the dental plaque biofilm leads to the development of oral disease.
• Over the past decades, the use of mouthwashes has become customary, usually following mechanical plaque biofilm control.
• Although people in industrialized countries use various oral hygiene products with the expectation of an oral health benefit, it is important that sufficient scientific evidence exists to support such claims.
• This meta-review summarized and appraised the current state of evidence that was based on systematic reviews, with respect to the efficacy of various active ingredients of over-the-counter chemotherapeutic mouthwash formulations for plaque control and managing gingivitis.
• Evidence suggests that a mouthwash containing chlorhexidine (CHX) is the first choice. The most reliable alternative for plaque control is essential oil (EO). No difference between CHX and EO with respect to gingivitis was observed.
ABSTRACT
What is the effect of a mouthwash containing various active chemical ingredients on plaque control and managing gingivitis in adults based on evidence gathered from existing systematic reviews? The summarized evidence suggests that mouthwashes containing chlorhexidine(CHX) and essential oils (EO) had a large effect supported by a strong body of evidence. Also there was strong evidence for a moderate effect of cetylpyridinium chloride(CPC).
Evidence suggests that a CHX mouthwash is the first choice, the most reliable alternative is EO. No difference between CHX and EO with respect to gingivitis was observed.
EVIDENCE
There is strong evidence in support of the efficacy of both CHX and EO that have a large beneficial effect on plaque reduction and a moderate effect on gingivitis. There is also strong evidence in support of the efficacy of CPC, which has a moderate beneficial effect on both plaque and gingivitis scores. There is moderate evidence for a small effect of ALX and for a large effect of TCL when used as prerinse before toothbrushing. Weak evidence emerged for small or indistinct effects of HEX, OA, SAN, and SnF2.
Breath malodor has important socioeconomic consequences and can reveal important diseases. A proper diagnosis and determination of the etiology allow initiation of the proper etiologic treatment.
Introduction
History
Bleaching agent
Classification of Bleaching technique.
Vital bleaching technique
Effect of vital bleaching on tooth structure
Effect of vital bleaching on tetracycline stain
Effect of vital bleaching on Fluorosis stain
Effect of vital bleaching on restorative material
Conclusion
References
Diagnosis and prevention of dental caries, DEVELOPMENT OF DENTAL CARIES, CARIES DETECTION AND DIAGNOSIS, DEVELOPMENT OF DENTAL CARIES, PREVENTION OF DENTAL CARIES, Nutrition and diet in caries control, Fluoride and caries control, Water fluoridation, Fluoride supplements, Other methods for providing systemic fluoride, Fissure sealing, TREATMENT PLANNING FOR CARIES PREVENTION,
Pulpectomy is the procedure of extirpating the diseased pulp associated with microorganism and debris from the canal and obturating with an antibacterial resorbable filling material and it is indicated when the inflammation of the pulpal tissue involves the radicular pulp or when nonvital tooth is diagnosed.
Obturating the canal creates a fluid tight seal along the length of the root from the coronal opening to the apical system and eliminating all portals of entry between the periodontium and the root canal system.
Effect of Calcium Hydroxide on Deep Caries Dentin: A Clinical Studyasclepiuspdfs
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of calcium hydroxide on arresting deep carious lesions in permanent teeth. Methods: A total of 190 patients aged between 15 and 55 years old were selected for this clinical study. Calcium hydroxide was applied to fully matured permanent anterior or posterior teeth clinically and radiographically after 2 weeks, 3–4 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1-year follow-up. Results: The overall survival rate was 89.4%. The findings of this study showed that calcium hydroxide is effective in arresting deep carious lesions and formation tertiary dentine as well as preservation teeth vitality. Conclusion: Calcium hydroxide is effective in reducing the risk of pulp exposure in deep carious lesion.
The Indian Dental Academy is the Leader in continuing dental education , training dentists in all aspects of dentistry and
offering a wide range of dental certified courses in different formats.for more details please visit
www.indiandentalacademy.com
Similar to 송혜민 메인 Short term clinical efficacy of new meridol halitosis tooth & tongue gel in combination with a tongue cleaner to r (20)
송혜민 메인 Short term clinical efficacy of new meridol halitosis tooth & tongue gel in combination with a tongue cleaner to r
1. 2013. 5. 31
3조 발표자 : 36번 송혜민
Short Term Clinical Efficacy of New
meridol HALITOSIS tooth & tongue gel in
Combination with a Tongue Cleaner to
Reduce Oral Malodor
D. Wilhelm, A.Himmelmann, C.Krause
proDERM Institute for Applied Dermatological
Research GmbH Schenefeld, Germany
2. • 87% 환자가 충치로 인해 구취를 겪고 있으며, 51%는 tongue coating, 17%는
치은염, 15%는 치주염, 17%는 여러 복합요인이 있다.
• 특히 혀의 뒷부분은 해부학적 구조에 의해 혐기성 세균의 서식처이다.
• 혀의 배면에는 여러 종류의 papillae가 있고, filliform papillae는 구취의 주요 요
인이다.
•Tongue cleaner와 tooth and tongue gel을 이용하여, 구취를 줄일 수 있는지를
gas chromatograph measure of VSCs를 이용하여 측정해 보았다.
Introduction
3. • Study Design and Population
1. single-center에서 (independent dermatological research
institute), examiner-blind, randomized, crossover superior design clinical study
가 a seven-day wash-in and a seven-day wash-out period between treatments.
2. 총 54 명의 구취 유발 구강 내 박테리아를 가진(organoleptic rating of 2
2, H2S [hydrogen sulphide] readings > 50 ppb, and CH3SH [methyl mercaptan]
readings > 50 ppb) 비흡연 피실험자들(44 women, 10 men; average age 47.7
years)로 구성. 44명의 피실험자들을 분석.
3. Treatment A: no treatment (control)
Treatment B: mechanical tongue cleaning with tongue cleaner
Treatment C: meridol HALITOSIS tooth & tongue gel applied on tongue
cleaner
Materials and Methods
4. • Wash-in and Wash-out Period
• 최상의 구강 분석하기 위해서 baseline 측정을 위해 최소 일주일전에 피실험자들은 감
독관의 지시를 받음.
• 피실험자들은 standard fluoride toothpaste (1400 ppm F from sodium
monofluorophosphate)와 toothbrush를 받고 감독관들에게 일주일동안 하루에 두번 그
리고 treatment 중간에 잇솔질을 하도록 지시받음.
Materials and Methods
• Test Materials
. meridol HALITOSIS tooth & tongue gel: 1400 ppm F
from amine fluoride/stannous fluoride (ASF), 0.57o zinc
lactate, oral malodor counter actives
. meridol HALITOSIS tonsue cleaner
6. • Organoleptic Ratings (Ors)
0 = Odor cannot be detected
1 = Questionable malodor, barely detectable
2 = Slight malodor, exceeds the threshold of malodor
recognition
3 = Moderate malodor, that is definitely detected
4 = Strong malodor
5 = Very strong malodor
Materials and Methods
• VSC Measurements Using a Gas Chromatograph
7. Materials and Methods
• VSC Measurements Using a Gas Chromatograph
Objective measurement
Detects VSC with appropriate
monitor; unable
to differentiate individual
sulphur compounds
Higher affinity to hydrogen
sulphide than dimethyl
sulphide
Simple to perform but fails to
detect oral malodour caused
by non-sulphide components
10. • 구취제거에는 기계적인 tongue cleansing은 비효율적이다.
• 기계적인 tongue cleansing은 단기간의 구취제거에는 효과가 있음을 이전 연
구들은 보여왔지만,
• 이 연구결과는 meridol HALITOSIS tooth & tongue gel이 장기간의 구취제거에 효과적
임을 보여주고 있다.
• 혀 후방 cleansing이 구취제거뿐 아니라 구강 위생을 위해 중요함을 알아야 한다.
Discussion
11. References
l. Delanghe G, Bollen C, van Steenberghe D, Feenstra L. Multidisciplinaire
rurnpak van halitosis. Ned Tjschrifr van Tandheelk 2008;105:314-7.
2. Tonz-etich J. Production and origin of oral malodor. A review of
mechanisms and methods of analysis. J Perio&tntol 19'7'7;48:13-20.
3. De Boever EH, de Uzeda M, Loesche WJ. Relationship between volatile
sulphur compounds, BANA-hydrolizing bacteria and gingival health in
patients with and without complaints of oral malodour. J Clin Dent
1994',4:ll4-9.
4. Bosy A, Kulkami GV, Rosenberg M, McCullmh CA. Relationship of oral
malodour to peri<xlontitis: evidence of independence in discrete
subpopulation. J Perktdonnl 1994;65:31 46.
5. Danser MM, Comez SM, van der Weijden CA. Tongue coating and
tongue brushing: a literature review. lnl J Dent H1,g 2003;l:l5l-8.
6. De Boever EH, Loesche WJ. The tongue microbiota and tongue sud'ace
cheracteristics contribute to oral malodour. In: Bad Breath: A
Multidisciltlinary- Appnach, van Steenberghe D, Rosenberg M, eds. l-euven
University Press, pp. I I l-21,1996.