This document summarizes an article about the possibility of producing meat in laboratories as an alternative to factory farming. It discusses Winston Churchill's prediction in 1932 that animal parts could be grown separately for food. Currently, the global livestock industry accounts for 20% of greenhouse gas emissions. The document outlines the issues with factory farming in terms of animal welfare and the environment. It notes that lab-grown meat could potentially use half the energy and 2% of farmland compared to conventional meat production. However, there are still many technical difficulties to overcome before lab-grown meat becomes commercially viable.

1. Test Tube Burgers & Other Meats From the Lab Michael Specter Published in The New Yorker, 23rd May 2011

2. ‘Fifty years hence, we shall escape the absurdity of growing a whole chicken in order to eat the breast or wing by growing these parts separately under a suitable medium.’ Winston Churchill 1932

3. WHY I CHOSE THIS PAPER

4. BACKGROUND Patterns of meat consumption have become increasingly dangerous for both individuals and the planet – the world consumes 285 million tons of meat every year. Global livestock industry is responsible for close to 20% of greenhouse gas emissions.

5. CONTENT OF THE ARTICLE This article discusses:- The possibility of growing meat in a lab based on Willem Van Eelen’s idea of IN-VITRO MEAT b. Problems faced by the project c. Environment and health impacts of factory farms

6. LAB GROWN MEAT

7. INTERESTING POINT ANIMAL WELFARE Billions of cows, pigs, chickens spend their entire lives crated, boxed, or force fed grain in repulsive conditions in factory farms. These animals are born solely to be killed and between the two events, they are treated like interchangeable parts in a machine.

8. INTERESTING POINT LACK OF SUPPORT “I am a scientist and my family has always respected that. When I started basically spending all my time trying to make the beginning of a hamburger, they would give me pitiful looks as if to say ‘You have completely degraded yourself’.” MARK POST, vascular biologist & surgeon

9. INTERESTING POINT LAB MEAT = GREEN/CLEAN MEAT? Research has provided a rough estimate that the production of lab meat would consume half the energy needed and occupy 2% of farmland Engineered meat = potential to be healthier?

10. INTERESTING POINT Animal activist are against the idea of lab grown meat although it can potentially save millions of animals. Removing animals completely is not beneficial – animals are part of the ecosystem.

11. KEY TAKEAWAY MESSAGES Technology often predates the broad adoption of technology. Lab grown meat could be a possible solution to carbon and cruelty free protein source however there are still many technical difficulties

12. PERSONAL ASSESSMENT OF ARTICLE 7 Provided background Information on in-vitro meat from its origin Collected insights from different perspectives (farmers, chef, PETA, etc) Lack specific data on the problems faced by the project 10

13. DISCUSSION QUESTIONS What are some of the issues that this project will face, aside from the (supposedly) ‘yuck’ factor Do you think more funding should be given to this project or sustainable farming?

14. THE END!