News Diffusion on Twitter: Comparing the Dissemination Careers for Mainstream...Axel Bruns
Paper by Axel Bruns and Tobias Keller, presented at the Social Media & Society 2020 conference, 22 July 2020. A video of the presentation is here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pCKpDkC8iqI.
Social Media and the News: Approaches to the Spread of (Mis)informationAxel Bruns
Paper presented by Axel Bruns as part of the workshop Integrity 2021: Integrity in Social Networks and Media at the 14th ACM Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM) in Jerusalem, Israel, March 2021.
'Fake News' on Facebook: A Large-Scale Longitudinal Study of Problematic Link...Axel Bruns
Long version of the paper presented by Dan Angus, Axel Bruns, Edward Hurcombe, and Stephen Harrington at the Association of Internet Researchers (AoIR) conference, 12-16 Oct. 2021.
From Cable Niche to Social Media Success: International Engagement with Sky N...Axel Bruns
Long version of the paper presented by Simon Copland, Tim Graham, and Axel Bruns at the Association of Internet Researchers (AoIR) conference, 12-16 Oct. 2021.
News Diffusion on Twitter: Comparing the Dissemination Careers for Mainstream...Axel Bruns
Paper by Axel Bruns and Tobias Keller, presented at the Social Media & Society 2020 conference, 22 July 2020. A video of the presentation is here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pCKpDkC8iqI.
Social Media and the News: Approaches to the Spread of (Mis)informationAxel Bruns
Paper presented by Axel Bruns as part of the workshop Integrity 2021: Integrity in Social Networks and Media at the 14th ACM Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM) in Jerusalem, Israel, March 2021.
'Fake News' on Facebook: A Large-Scale Longitudinal Study of Problematic Link...Axel Bruns
Long version of the paper presented by Dan Angus, Axel Bruns, Edward Hurcombe, and Stephen Harrington at the Association of Internet Researchers (AoIR) conference, 12-16 Oct. 2021.
From Cable Niche to Social Media Success: International Engagement with Sky N...Axel Bruns
Long version of the paper presented by Simon Copland, Tim Graham, and Axel Bruns at the Association of Internet Researchers (AoIR) conference, 12-16 Oct. 2021.
The Conversation on Facebook: Patterns of Dissemination in Australia and Angl...Axel Bruns
Long version of the video presented by Axel Bruns, Michelle Riedlinger, and Jean Burgess at the Association of Internet Researchers (AoIR) conference, 12-16 Oct. 2021.
Sharing, Spamming, Sockpuppeting: Comparing the Twitter Dissemination Careers...Axel Bruns
Paper presented by Axel Bruns, Tim Graham, Brenda Moon, Tobias R. Keller, and Dan Angus at the International Communication Association virtual conference, 20-26 May 2020.
Shareworthiness and Motivated Reasoning in Hyper-Partisan News Sharing Behavi...Axel Bruns
Paper by Magdalena Wischnewski, Axel Bruns, and Tobias Keller, presented at the 2021 International Communication Association conference, 27-31 May 2021.
A rapid increase in social networking services in recent years has enabled people to share and seek information effectively. Meanwhile, the openness and timeliness of social networking sites also allow for the rapid creating and dissemination of misinformation. As witnessed in recent incidents of fake news and rumors, misinformation escalates quickly and can impact social media users with undesirable consequences and wreak havoc instantaneously. Despite many people have been aware of that fake news and rumors are misleading the public and even compromising elections, the problem is not going away. In this tutorial, we will discuss how misinformation gains traction in the race for attention, introduce emerging challenges of identifying misinformation, present a comparative survey of current data mining research in tackling the challenges, and suggest available resources and point to directions for future work. http://www.public.asu.edu/~liangwu1/ICDM17MisinformationTutorial.html
Slides for "Fake News: Why It Matters and How to Fight It" an event hosted by Eugene Public Library, May 23 2017.
"UO Journalism professors Damian Radcliffe and Peter Laufer
explore the current debate about fake news. These information experts will offer historical insights, contemporary analysis, and practical tools to empower the public in telling fact from fiction." https://www.eugene-or.gov/Calendar.aspx?EID=12837
This handout was created after a presentation "Orientation to Online Journalism" which was done as part of a UN Media Workshop in Georgetown Guyana on 12 September, 2015. The workshop was convened by Dr Paloma Mohammed.
‘Like a Virus’: Disinformation in the Age of COVID-19Axel Bruns
Presentation by Tim Graham and Axel Bruns as part of the Centre for Responsible Technology's Australia at Home series, 23 Apr. 2020.
A video of the presentation is here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eu-BMi4TiQs
The Conversation on Facebook: Patterns of Dissemination in Australia and Angl...Axel Bruns
Long version of the video presented by Axel Bruns, Michelle Riedlinger, and Jean Burgess at the Association of Internet Researchers (AoIR) conference, 12-16 Oct. 2021.
Sharing, Spamming, Sockpuppeting: Comparing the Twitter Dissemination Careers...Axel Bruns
Paper presented by Axel Bruns, Tim Graham, Brenda Moon, Tobias R. Keller, and Dan Angus at the International Communication Association virtual conference, 20-26 May 2020.
Shareworthiness and Motivated Reasoning in Hyper-Partisan News Sharing Behavi...Axel Bruns
Paper by Magdalena Wischnewski, Axel Bruns, and Tobias Keller, presented at the 2021 International Communication Association conference, 27-31 May 2021.
A rapid increase in social networking services in recent years has enabled people to share and seek information effectively. Meanwhile, the openness and timeliness of social networking sites also allow for the rapid creating and dissemination of misinformation. As witnessed in recent incidents of fake news and rumors, misinformation escalates quickly and can impact social media users with undesirable consequences and wreak havoc instantaneously. Despite many people have been aware of that fake news and rumors are misleading the public and even compromising elections, the problem is not going away. In this tutorial, we will discuss how misinformation gains traction in the race for attention, introduce emerging challenges of identifying misinformation, present a comparative survey of current data mining research in tackling the challenges, and suggest available resources and point to directions for future work. http://www.public.asu.edu/~liangwu1/ICDM17MisinformationTutorial.html
Slides for "Fake News: Why It Matters and How to Fight It" an event hosted by Eugene Public Library, May 23 2017.
"UO Journalism professors Damian Radcliffe and Peter Laufer
explore the current debate about fake news. These information experts will offer historical insights, contemporary analysis, and practical tools to empower the public in telling fact from fiction." https://www.eugene-or.gov/Calendar.aspx?EID=12837
This handout was created after a presentation "Orientation to Online Journalism" which was done as part of a UN Media Workshop in Georgetown Guyana on 12 September, 2015. The workshop was convened by Dr Paloma Mohammed.
‘Like a Virus’: Disinformation in the Age of COVID-19Axel Bruns
Presentation by Tim Graham and Axel Bruns as part of the Centre for Responsible Technology's Australia at Home series, 23 Apr. 2020.
A video of the presentation is here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eu-BMi4TiQs
Towards a New Empiricism: Polarisation across Four DimensionsAxel Bruns
Paper by Axel Bruns, Tariq Choucair, Katharina Esau, Sebastian Svegaard, and Samantha Vilkins, presented at the IAMCR 2023 conference, Lyon, 9-13 July 2023.
Determining the Drivers and Dynamics of Partisanship and Polarisation in Onli...Axel Bruns
Paper by Axel Bruns, Katharina Esau, Tariq Choucair, Sebastian Svegaard, and Samantha Vilkins, presented at the ECREA Political Communication conference in Berlin, 1 Sep. 2023.
Disseminating Scientific Papers via Twitter: Practical Insights and Research ...SC CTSI at USC and CHLA
About one-fifth of current scientific papers are being shared on Twitter. With 230 million active users and 24 percent of the U.S. online population using the microblogging platform, hopes are high that tweets mentioning scientific articles reflect some type of interest by the general public and might even be able to measure the societal impact of research. However, early studies show that most of the engagement with scientific papers on Twitter takes place among members of academia and thus reflects visibility within the scientific community rather than impact on society. At the same time, some tweets do not involve any human engagement but rather are generated automatically by Twitter bots.
This talk focuses on identifying audiences on Twitter and teaches participants how to collect, analyze, visualize, and interpret diffusion patterns of scientific articles on Twitter. The course provides an overview of Altmetrics research and present the challenges – including methods and first results – of classifying Twitter user groups, with a particular focus on identifying members of the general public and measuring societal impact. The course will provide hands-on exercises and instructions on how to analyze by whom, when, and how scientific papers are shared on Twitter.
Speaker: Stefanie Haustein, Ph.D., Assistant Professor, School of Information Studies, University of Ottawa
The Anatomy of Virality: How COVID-19 Conspiracy Theories Spread across Socia...Axel Bruns
Keynote by Axel Bruns, with Edward Hurcombe and Stephen Harrington, presented at the International Center for Journalists' Empowering the Truth Summit, 23 Feb. 2023.
PANDEMIC INFORMATION DISSEMINATION WEB APPLICATION: A MANUAL DESIGN FOR EVERYONEijcsitcejournal
The aim of this research is to generate a web application from an inedited methodology with a series of
instructions indicating the coding in a flow diagram. The primary purpose of this methodology is to aid
non-profits in disseminating information regarding the COVID-19 pandemic, so that users can share vital
and up-to-date information. This is a functional design, and a series of screenshots demonstrating its
behaviour is presented below. This unique design arose from the necessity to create a web application for
an information dissemination platform; it also addresses an audience that does not have programming
knowledge. This document uses the scientific method in its writing. The authors understand that there is a
similar design in the bibliography; therefore, the differences between the designs are described herein; it
is very important to point out that this proposal can be taken as an alternative to the design of any web
application.
understanding the pandemic through mining covid news using natural language p...Kishor Datta Gupta
Newspaper reports are a daily information tank for the majority of the world. We rely on newspapers as a primary source of information. In this research, we introduce a collection of 1050 news report dataset on COVID-19 from two different countries and used Natural Language Processing techniques to extract knowledge about the virus, including the number of COVID-cases, trending topics per month, sentiment analysis, etc. Moreover, we compared how the virus spreads and impacts a developed country and a developing country. Our curated dataset can be used in various socio-economical studies to understand news media's effect on public awareness
Conference: 2021 IEEE 11th Annual Computing and Communication Workshop and Conference (CCWC)At: Lasvegas, NV, USA
Presentation at AMIA 2013 Washington DC, Nov 19th, Panel S50 Social Media and Me. I am focussing on the use of social media for research, in particular as tool for filtering the literature, twimpact factor, altmetrics...
AI in between online and offline discourse - and what has ChatGPT to do with ...Stefan Dietze
Talk at Bonn University on general AI and NLP challenges in the context of online discourse analysis. Specific focus on challenges arising from the widespread adoption of neural large language models.
This presentation was provided by Anne Stone of TBI Communications during the NISO Training Thursday event, Metrics Case Studies, held on December 14, 2017.
Similar to Sharing Uncertain Science: Mapping the Circulation of COVID-19 Preprint Research Reported in The Conversation on Facebook (20)
Types of Polarisation and Their Operationalisation in Digital and Social Medi...Axel Bruns
Paper by Axel Bruns, Tariq Choucair, Katharina Esau, Sebastian Svegaard, and Samantha Vilkins, presented at the Association of Internet Researchers conference, Philadelphia, 18 Oct. 2023.
A Platform Policy Implementation Audit of Actions against Russia’s State-Cont...Axel Bruns
Paper by Sofya Glazunova, Anna Ryzhova, Axel Bruns, Silvia Ximena Montaña-Niño, Arista Beseler, and Ehsan Dehghan, presented at the International Communication Association conference, Toronto, 29 May 2023.
The Filter in Our (?) Heads: Digital Media and PolarisationAxel Bruns
Invited presentation in a seminar series organised by the Centre for Deliberative Democracy & Global Governance at the University of Canberra, the QUT Digital Media Research Centre, and the News and Media Research Centre at the University of Canberra.
Gatewatching 5: Weaponising Newssharing: ‘Fake News’ and Other MalinformationAxel Bruns
Lecture 5 in the course From Gatekeeping to Gatewatching: News and Journalism in the Digital Age.
This lecture series addresses the continuing transformation of the production and consumption of journalism in the contemporary media environment. It provides a brief history of the impact of participatory online news production and engagement practices – from the first wave of citizen journalism to the social media platforms of today – on how news content is disseminated and experienced; examines reactive and proactive responses to these changes by news organisations and journalists; and explores the longer-term impact of these developments on the public sphere, touching on the power of social media platforms and their role in shaping their users’ information diets.
Readings are largely drawn from Gatewatching and News Curation: Journalism, Social Media, and the Public Sphere (Bruns, 2018), with additional readings recommended for selected lectures.
Reading for this lecture:
Bruns, A., Harrington, S., & Hurcombe, E. (2021). Coronavirus Conspiracy Theories: Tracing Misinformation Trajectories from the Fringes to the Mainstream. In M. Lewis, E. Govender, & K. Holland (Eds.), Communicating COVID-19: Interdisciplinary Perspectives (pp. 229–249). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79735-5_12
Gatewatching 10: New(s) Publics in the Public SphereAxel Bruns
Lecture 10 in the course From Gatekeeping to Gatewatching: News and Journalism in the Digital Age.
This lecture series addresses the continuing transformation of the production and consumption of journalism in the contemporary media environment. It provides a brief history of the impact of participatory online news production and engagement practices – from the first wave of citizen journalism to the social media platforms of today – on how news content is disseminated and experienced; examines reactive and proactive responses to these changes by news organisations and journalists; and explores the longer-term impact of these developments on the public sphere, touching on the power of social media platforms and their role in shaping their users’ information diets.
Readings are largely drawn from Gatewatching and News Curation: Journalism, Social Media, and the Public Sphere (Bruns, 2018), with additional readings recommended for selected lectures.
Reading for this lecture:
Bruns, A. (2018). New(s) Publics in the Public Sphere. Gatewatching and News Curation: Journalism, Social Media, and the Public Sphere. Ch. 8. Peter Lang.
Gatewatching 4: Random Acts of Gatewatching: Everyday Newssharing PracticesAxel Bruns
Lecture 4 in the course From Gatekeeping to Gatewatching: News and Journalism in the Digital Age.
This lecture series addresses the continuing transformation of the production and consumption of journalism in the contemporary media environment. It provides a brief history of the impact of participatory online news production and engagement practices – from the first wave of citizen journalism to the social media platforms of today – on how news content is disseminated and experienced; examines reactive and proactive responses to these changes by news organisations and journalists; and explores the longer-term impact of these developments on the public sphere, touching on the power of social media platforms and their role in shaping their users’ information diets.
Readings are largely drawn from Gatewatching and News Curation: Journalism, Social Media, and the Public Sphere (Bruns, 2018), with additional readings recommended for selected lectures.
Reading for this lecture:
Bruns, A. (2018). Random Acts of Gatewatching: Everyday Newssharing Practices. Gatewatching and News Curation: Journalism, Social Media, and the Public Sphere. Ch. 4. Peter Lang.
Gatewatching 11: Echo Chambers? Filter Bubbles? Reviewing the EvidenceAxel Bruns
Lecture 11 in the course From Gatekeeping to Gatewatching: News and Journalism in the Digital Age.
This lecture series addresses the continuing transformation of the production and consumption of journalism in the contemporary media environment. It provides a brief history of the impact of participatory online news production and engagement practices – from the first wave of citizen journalism to the social media platforms of today – on how news content is disseminated and experienced; examines reactive and proactive responses to these changes by news organisations and journalists; and explores the longer-term impact of these developments on the public sphere, touching on the power of social media platforms and their role in shaping their users’ information diets.
Readings are largely drawn from Gatewatching and News Curation: Journalism, Social Media, and the Public Sphere (Bruns, 2018), with additional readings recommended for selected lectures.
Reading for this lecture:
Bruns, A. (2022). Echo Chambers? Filter Bubbles? The Misleading Metaphors That Obscure the Real Problem. In M. Pérez-Escolar & J. M. Noguera-Vivo (Eds.), Hate Speech and Polarization in Participatory Society (pp. 33–48). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003109891-4
Gatewatching 1: Introduction: What’s So Different about Journalism Today?Axel Bruns
Lecture 1 in the course From Gatekeeping to Gatewatching: News and Journalism in the Digital Age.
This lecture series addresses the continuing transformation of the production and consumption of journalism in the contemporary media environment. It provides a brief history of the impact of participatory online news production and engagement practices – from the first wave of citizen journalism to the social media platforms of today – on how news content is disseminated and experienced; examines reactive and proactive responses to these changes by news organisations and journalists; and explores the longer-term impact of these developments on the public sphere, touching on the power of social media platforms and their role in shaping their users’ information diets.
Readings are largely drawn from Gatewatching and News Curation: Journalism, Social Media, and the Public Sphere (Bruns, 2018), with additional readings recommended for selected lectures.
Reading for this lecture:
Bruns, A. (2018). Introduction. Gatewatching and News Curation: Journalism, Social Media, and the Public Sphere. Ch. 1. Peter Lang.
Lecture 8 in the course From Gatekeeping to Gatewatching: News and Journalism in the Digital Age.
This lecture series addresses the continuing transformation of the production and consumption of journalism in the contemporary media environment. It provides a brief history of the impact of participatory online news production and engagement practices – from the first wave of citizen journalism to the social media platforms of today – on how news content is disseminated and experienced; examines reactive and proactive responses to these changes by news organisations and journalists; and explores the longer-term impact of these developments on the public sphere, touching on the power of social media platforms and their role in shaping their users’ information diets.
Readings are largely drawn from Gatewatching and News Curation: Journalism, Social Media, and the Public Sphere (Bruns, 2018), with additional readings recommended for selected lectures.
Reading for this lecture:
Bruns, A. (2018). Hybrid News Coverage: Liveblogs. Gatewatching and News Curation: Journalism, Social Media, and the Public Sphere. Ch. 7. Peter Lang.
Gatewatching 2: From Gatekeeping to Gatewatching: The First Wave of Citizen M...Axel Bruns
Lecture 2 in the course From Gatekeeping to Gatewatching: News and Journalism in the Digital Age.
This lecture series addresses the continuing transformation of the production and consumption of journalism in the contemporary media environment. It provides a brief history of the impact of participatory online news production and engagement practices – from the first wave of citizen journalism to the social media platforms of today – on how news content is disseminated and experienced; examines reactive and proactive responses to these changes by news organisations and journalists; and explores the longer-term impact of these developments on the public sphere, touching on the power of social media platforms and their role in shaping their users’ information diets.
Readings are largely drawn from Gatewatching and News Curation: Journalism, Social Media, and the Public Sphere (Bruns, 2018), with additional readings recommended for selected lectures.
Reading for this lecture:
Bruns, A. (2018). From Gatekeeping to Gatewatching: The First Wave of Citizen Media. Gatewatching and News Curation: Journalism, Social Media, and the Public Sphere. Ch. 2. Peter Lang.
Gatewatching 9: ‘Real’ News and ‘Fake’ News: Fact-Checking and Media LiteracyAxel Bruns
Lecture 9 in the course From Gatekeeping to Gatewatching: News and Journalism in the Digital Age.
This lecture series addresses the continuing transformation of the production and consumption of journalism in the contemporary media environment. It provides a brief history of the impact of participatory online news production and engagement practices – from the first wave of citizen journalism to the social media platforms of today – on how news content is disseminated and experienced; examines reactive and proactive responses to these changes by news organisations and journalists; and explores the longer-term impact of these developments on the public sphere, touching on the power of social media platforms and their role in shaping their users’ information diets.
Readings are largely drawn from Gatewatching and News Curation: Journalism, Social Media, and the Public Sphere (Bruns, 2018), with additional readings recommended for selected lectures.
Reading for this lecture:
Graves, L., & Cherubini, F. (2016). The Rise of Fact-Checking Sites in Europe. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:d55ef650-e351-4526-b942-6c9e00129ad7
Gatewatching 13: Conclusion: A Social News Media NetworkAxel Bruns
Lecture 13 in the course From Gatekeeping to Gatewatching: News and Journalism in the Digital Age.
This lecture series addresses the continuing transformation of the production and consumption of journalism in the contemporary media environment. It provides a brief history of the impact of participatory online news production and engagement practices – from the first wave of citizen journalism to the social media platforms of today – on how news content is disseminated and experienced; examines reactive and proactive responses to these changes by news organisations and journalists; and explores the longer-term impact of these developments on the public sphere, touching on the power of social media platforms and their role in shaping their users’ information diets.
Readings are largely drawn from Gatewatching and News Curation: Journalism, Social Media, and the Public Sphere (Bruns, 2018), with additional readings recommended for selected lectures.
Reading for this lecture:
Bruns, A. (2018). Conclusion: A Social News Media Network. Gatewatching and News Curation: Journalism, Social Media, and the Public Sphere. Ch. 9. Peter Lang.
Introduction:
RNA interference (RNAi) or Post-Transcriptional Gene Silencing (PTGS) is an important biological process for modulating eukaryotic gene expression.
It is highly conserved process of posttranscriptional gene silencing by which double stranded RNA (dsRNA) causes sequence-specific degradation of mRNA sequences.
dsRNA-induced gene silencing (RNAi) is reported in a wide range of eukaryotes ranging from worms, insects, mammals and plants.
This process mediates resistance to both endogenous parasitic and exogenous pathogenic nucleic acids, and regulates the expression of protein-coding genes.
What are small ncRNAs?
micro RNA (miRNA)
short interfering RNA (siRNA)
Properties of small non-coding RNA:
Involved in silencing mRNA transcripts.
Called “small” because they are usually only about 21-24 nucleotides long.
Synthesized by first cutting up longer precursor sequences (like the 61nt one that Lee discovered).
Silence an mRNA by base pairing with some sequence on the mRNA.
Discovery of siRNA?
The first small RNA:
In 1993 Rosalind Lee (Victor Ambros lab) was studying a non- coding gene in C. elegans, lin-4, that was involved in silencing of another gene, lin-14, at the appropriate time in the
development of the worm C. elegans.
Two small transcripts of lin-4 (22nt and 61nt) were found to be complementary to a sequence in the 3' UTR of lin-14.
Because lin-4 encoded no protein, she deduced that it must be these transcripts that are causing the silencing by RNA-RNA interactions.
Types of RNAi ( non coding RNA)
MiRNA
Length (23-25 nt)
Trans acting
Binds with target MRNA in mismatch
Translation inhibition
Si RNA
Length 21 nt.
Cis acting
Bind with target Mrna in perfect complementary sequence
Piwi-RNA
Length ; 25 to 36 nt.
Expressed in Germ Cells
Regulates trnasposomes activity
MECHANISM OF RNAI:
First the double-stranded RNA teams up with a protein complex named Dicer, which cuts the long RNA into short pieces.
Then another protein complex called RISC (RNA-induced silencing complex) discards one of the two RNA strands.
The RISC-docked, single-stranded RNA then pairs with the homologous mRNA and destroys it.
THE RISC COMPLEX:
RISC is large(>500kD) RNA multi- protein Binding complex which triggers MRNA degradation in response to MRNA
Unwinding of double stranded Si RNA by ATP independent Helicase
Active component of RISC is Ago proteins( ENDONUCLEASE) which cleave target MRNA.
DICER: endonuclease (RNase Family III)
Argonaute: Central Component of the RNA-Induced Silencing Complex (RISC)
One strand of the dsRNA produced by Dicer is retained in the RISC complex in association with Argonaute
ARGONAUTE PROTEIN :
1.PAZ(PIWI/Argonaute/ Zwille)- Recognition of target MRNA
2.PIWI (p-element induced wimpy Testis)- breaks Phosphodiester bond of mRNA.)RNAse H activity.
MiRNA:
The Double-stranded RNAs are naturally produced in eukaryotic cells during development, and they have a key role in regulating gene expression .
Richard's aventures in two entangled wonderlandsRichard Gill
Since the loophole-free Bell experiments of 2020 and the Nobel prizes in physics of 2022, critics of Bell's work have retreated to the fortress of super-determinism. Now, super-determinism is a derogatory word - it just means "determinism". Palmer, Hance and Hossenfelder argue that quantum mechanics and determinism are not incompatible, using a sophisticated mathematical construction based on a subtle thinning of allowed states and measurements in quantum mechanics, such that what is left appears to make Bell's argument fail, without altering the empirical predictions of quantum mechanics. I think however that it is a smoke screen, and the slogan "lost in math" comes to my mind. I will discuss some other recent disproofs of Bell's theorem using the language of causality based on causal graphs. Causal thinking is also central to law and justice. I will mention surprising connections to my work on serial killer nurse cases, in particular the Dutch case of Lucia de Berk and the current UK case of Lucy Letby.
Earliest Galaxies in the JADES Origins Field: Luminosity Function and Cosmic ...Sérgio Sacani
We characterize the earliest galaxy population in the JADES Origins Field (JOF), the deepest
imaging field observed with JWST. We make use of the ancillary Hubble optical images (5 filters
spanning 0.4−0.9µm) and novel JWST images with 14 filters spanning 0.8−5µm, including 7 mediumband filters, and reaching total exposure times of up to 46 hours per filter. We combine all our data
at > 2.3µm to construct an ultradeep image, reaching as deep as ≈ 31.4 AB mag in the stack and
30.3-31.0 AB mag (5σ, r = 0.1” circular aperture) in individual filters. We measure photometric
redshifts and use robust selection criteria to identify a sample of eight galaxy candidates at redshifts
z = 11.5 − 15. These objects show compact half-light radii of R1/2 ∼ 50 − 200pc, stellar masses of
M⋆ ∼ 107−108M⊙, and star-formation rates of SFR ∼ 0.1−1 M⊙ yr−1
. Our search finds no candidates
at 15 < z < 20, placing upper limits at these redshifts. We develop a forward modeling approach to
infer the properties of the evolving luminosity function without binning in redshift or luminosity that
marginalizes over the photometric redshift uncertainty of our candidate galaxies and incorporates the
impact of non-detections. We find a z = 12 luminosity function in good agreement with prior results,
and that the luminosity function normalization and UV luminosity density decline by a factor of ∼ 2.5
from z = 12 to z = 14. We discuss the possible implications of our results in the context of theoretical
models for evolution of the dark matter halo mass function.
Comparing Evolved Extractive Text Summary Scores of Bidirectional Encoder Rep...University of Maribor
Slides from:
11th International Conference on Electrical, Electronics and Computer Engineering (IcETRAN), Niš, 3-6 June 2024
Track: Artificial Intelligence
https://www.etran.rs/2024/en/home-english/
Seminar of U.V. Spectroscopy by SAMIR PANDASAMIR PANDA
Spectroscopy is a branch of science dealing the study of interaction of electromagnetic radiation with matter.
Ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy refers to absorption spectroscopy or reflect spectroscopy in the UV-VIS spectral region.
Ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy is an analytical method that can measure the amount of light received by the analyte.
Cancer cell metabolism: special Reference to Lactate PathwayAADYARAJPANDEY1
Normal Cell Metabolism:
Cellular respiration describes the series of steps that cells use to break down sugar and other chemicals to get the energy we need to function.
Energy is stored in the bonds of glucose and when glucose is broken down, much of that energy is released.
Cell utilize energy in the form of ATP.
The first step of respiration is called glycolysis. In a series of steps, glycolysis breaks glucose into two smaller molecules - a chemical called pyruvate. A small amount of ATP is formed during this process.
Most healthy cells continue the breakdown in a second process, called the Kreb's cycle. The Kreb's cycle allows cells to “burn” the pyruvates made in glycolysis to get more ATP.
The last step in the breakdown of glucose is called oxidative phosphorylation (Ox-Phos).
It takes place in specialized cell structures called mitochondria. This process produces a large amount of ATP. Importantly, cells need oxygen to complete oxidative phosphorylation.
If a cell completes only glycolysis, only 2 molecules of ATP are made per glucose. However, if the cell completes the entire respiration process (glycolysis - Kreb's - oxidative phosphorylation), about 36 molecules of ATP are created, giving it much more energy to use.
IN CANCER CELL:
Unlike healthy cells that "burn" the entire molecule of sugar to capture a large amount of energy as ATP, cancer cells are wasteful.
Cancer cells only partially break down sugar molecules. They overuse the first step of respiration, glycolysis. They frequently do not complete the second step, oxidative phosphorylation.
This results in only 2 molecules of ATP per each glucose molecule instead of the 36 or so ATPs healthy cells gain. As a result, cancer cells need to use a lot more sugar molecules to get enough energy to survive.
Unlike healthy cells that "burn" the entire molecule of sugar to capture a large amount of energy as ATP, cancer cells are wasteful.
Cancer cells only partially break down sugar molecules. They overuse the first step of respiration, glycolysis. They frequently do not complete the second step, oxidative phosphorylation.
This results in only 2 molecules of ATP per each glucose molecule instead of the 36 or so ATPs healthy cells gain. As a result, cancer cells need to use a lot more sugar molecules to get enough energy to survive.
introduction to WARBERG PHENOMENA:
WARBURG EFFECT Usually, cancer cells are highly glycolytic (glucose addiction) and take up more glucose than do normal cells from outside.
Otto Heinrich Warburg (; 8 October 1883 – 1 August 1970) In 1931 was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology for his "discovery of the nature and mode of action of the respiratory enzyme.
WARNBURG EFFECT : cancer cells under aerobic (well-oxygenated) conditions to metabolize glucose to lactate (aerobic glycolysis) is known as the Warburg effect. Warburg made the observation that tumor slices consume glucose and secrete lactate at a higher rate than normal tissues.
Deep Behavioral Phenotyping in Systems Neuroscience for Functional Atlasing a...Ana Luísa Pinho
Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) provides means to characterize brain activations in response to behavior. However, cognitive neuroscience has been limited to group-level effects referring to the performance of specific tasks. To obtain the functional profile of elementary cognitive mechanisms, the combination of brain responses to many tasks is required. Yet, to date, both structural atlases and parcellation-based activations do not fully account for cognitive function and still present several limitations. Further, they do not adapt overall to individual characteristics. In this talk, I will give an account of deep-behavioral phenotyping strategies, namely data-driven methods in large task-fMRI datasets, to optimize functional brain-data collection and improve inference of effects-of-interest related to mental processes. Key to this approach is the employment of fast multi-functional paradigms rich on features that can be well parametrized and, consequently, facilitate the creation of psycho-physiological constructs to be modelled with imaging data. Particular emphasis will be given to music stimuli when studying high-order cognitive mechanisms, due to their ecological nature and quality to enable complex behavior compounded by discrete entities. I will also discuss how deep-behavioral phenotyping and individualized models applied to neuroimaging data can better account for the subject-specific organization of domain-general cognitive systems in the human brain. Finally, the accumulation of functional brain signatures brings the possibility to clarify relationships among tasks and create a univocal link between brain systems and mental functions through: (1) the development of ontologies proposing an organization of cognitive processes; and (2) brain-network taxonomies describing functional specialization. To this end, tools to improve commensurability in cognitive science are necessary, such as public repositories, ontology-based platforms and automated meta-analysis tools. I will thus discuss some brain-atlasing resources currently under development, and their applicability in cognitive as well as clinical neuroscience.
Lateral Ventricles.pdf very easy good diagrams comprehensive
Sharing Uncertain Science: Mapping the Circulation of COVID-19 Preprint Research Reported in The Conversation on Facebook
1. CRICOS No.00213J
Sharing uncertain science: Mapping the
circulation of COVID-19 preprint research
reported in The Conversation on Facebook
Michelle Riedlinger, Axel Bruns, Jean Burgess
QUT Digital Media Research Centre / Global Journalism Innovation Lab
Alice Fleerackers
ScholCommLab, Simon Fraser University, British Columbia, Canada
michelle.riedlinger@ qut.edu.au
5. CRICOS No.00213J
Research questions
RQ1: Are there identifiable patterns in the content included in The
Conversation COVID-19 preprint articles (TC preprint articles) and
the presence of markers of scientific uncertainty? (issue, time etc.)
RQ2: Who is sharing TC preprint on Facebook? (moving beyond
academics)
RQ3: How are Facebook users engaging with scientific uncertainty when
posting about TC preprint articles?
6. CRICOS No.00213J
Finding 1: Relationships between content in
The Conversation COVID-19 preprint articles
and markers of scientific uncertainty
7. CRICOS No.00213J
The Conversation articles presenting preprint research negatively included
more markers of scientific uncertainty than articles presenting preprint
research positively.
TC stories Preprint
mentions
Uncertainty
markers
Positive 33 9
Negative 8 8
Total 41 17
The relation between these variables was significant, X2 (1, N = 41) = 4.6, p = .032
8. CRICOS No.00213J
Negative preprint presentation
While a preliminary report has suggested a longer incubation period of up to 24
days, this is considered unlikely (https://theconversation.com/yes-australians-on-
board-the-diamond-princess-need-to-go-into-quarantine-again-its-time-to-reset-the-
clock-131906)
The virus appears to be about as contagious as influenza
(https://theconversation.com/how-big-will-the-coronavirus-epidemic-be-an-epidemiologist-
updates-his-concerns-133133)
A study from Harvard University – not yet peer-reviewed – assessed travel intensities from
Wuhan to various countries. The researchers concluded that it is shocking that Indonesia has
yet to confirm any 2019-nCoV cases (https://theconversation.com/open-science-promotes-
global-scientific-collaboration-to-tackle-coronavirus-why-hasnt-indonesia-contributed-131318)
Positive preprint presentation
10. CRICOS No.00213J
Frequency
The official TC Facebook pages received 15% of shares, 30% of comments
and 10% of reactions of all Facebook spaces (groups, pages and profiles)
sharing TC preprint articles
15. CRICOS No.00213J
Facebook users mostly reshared posts with TC preprint links without
comment or shared posts that included limited scientific uncertainty
16. CRICOS No.00213J
Facebook users posting TC preprint article links rarely included markers of
scientific uncertainty in their posts
Facebook
posts
Mentions
"preprint"
Mentions
work is
unreviewed
Mentions
work is
preliminary
Mentions
verification
needed
Any of
four
devices
315 1 1 2
Epistemic
modal
verbs
Mentions
“could”
Mentions
“may”
Mentions
“might”
Mentions
“perhaps”
15 10 4 1 1
17. CRICOS No.00213J
Preliminary findings – early in the pandemic…
• TC reporting of preprint research (positively or negatively) was significantly related to the
inclusion/exclusion of markers of scientific uncertainty.
• Facebook user engagement with TC preprint articles was issue-based (e.g. COVID-19
risks, spread and containment measures, “cures”) regardless of scientific uncertainty
associated with the research
• Citizens, often in Facebook groups (geolocated, issue-based e.g. health information), were
sharing TC preprint articles, and few Facebook spaces shared details about a political
identity
• Facebook users mostly reshared posts with TC preprint article links without comment or
shared information with posts that indicated limited scientific uncertainty
18. CRICOS No.00213J
Study limitations
• Limited to TC articles reporting on COVID-19 preprint research in the first three months of the
pandemic
• Does not include TC content republished in other outlets
• Focusses on public Facebook spaces (groups, pages, profiles); no data on private FB spaces
Next steps
• Include TC reporting of preprint research for 2020 (changes over time and issue)
• Cross-platform analysis - comparisons with Twitter
19. CRICOS No.00213J
Very special thanks to Jane Tan for assistance with the Crowdtangle API and
Aleesha Rodriguez for assistance with data coding.
This research is funded by the ARC project LP160100205 Amplifying Public Value:
Scholarly Contributions’ Impact on Public Debate and the SSHRC project Global
Journalism Innovation Lab.
Facebook data are provided courtesy of CrowdTangle.
Acknowledgments