The Global Eradication and Response Database (GERDA) summarises incursion response and eradication programmes from around the world. The purpose of GERDA is to determine which characteristics lead to the success or failure of eradication programmes.
Session 8: The value of GERDA to the border biosecurity system
1. Embedding GERDA into the biosecurity
landscape: uptake and legacy
Jessica Dohmen-Vereijssen
http://b3.net.nz/gerda
End-users said
GERDA is
incomplete
but believe it has
potential as an
eradication
response tool when
the following is
addressed:mapped long-term
hosting options and
devised an
implementation plan
to achieve a long-
term legacy for
GERDA access to this biosecurity
information enabling
rapid, well-informed and
defendable decisions with
regard to biosecurity
incursions
biosecurity community
sharing of data from diverse
sources around the world to
create a powerful knowledge
centre about pest incursions,
eradications and responses
prudhommelab.com
Editor's Notes
The project team developed a Business Plan to ensure the value of the Global Eradication and Response Database (GERDA) to end-users is well understood and that a feasible long-term plan is devised that will enable GERDA deliver to those end-user needs. In the business plan we have documented the current status of GERDA, sought end-user feedback on its value and application, mapped long-term hosting options and devised an implementation plan to achieve a long-term legacy for GERDA.
GERDA was developed in New Zealand’s Better Border Biosecurity (B3) collaboration, with an international team, in order to determine what characteristics lead to successful eradication programmes and others to failed attempts. Continued investment in the development of GERDA through B3 and the PBCRC has enabled its expansion to become more valuable to end-users, shifting the focus from a research tool to an operational tool.
End-user surveys and further critical assessment has identified that GERDA is unique and can provide a valuable product and the key factors that need to be addressed to enable its wide uptake and use.
The suggestions can be categorised into four key themes:
Software improvements
Access
Data
Data quality assessment
Each of the key criteria above can be addressed to enhance the value of GERDA to its target customers.
GERDA needs to increase the quantity of data, especially from countries other than Australia and New Zealand, validate their quality, and provide expert interpretation to ensure increased end-user uptake which will enable rapid, well-informed and defendable decisions with regard to biosecurity incursions.
Therefore, we will conduct staged approach in the next 12–18 months, where we address the main issues and criteria highlighted by the end-user survey:
1. A front-end re-design of the website to meet end-user needs
2. A partnership with the University of Auckland for data expansion.
We mapped out the pathway GERDA should take to create maximum value for its target users, we hope that with the changes, the end-users have access to more valuable biosecurity information enabling rapid, well-informed and defendable decisions with regard to biosecurity incursions.