This document discusses California disaster service workers and the incident command system. It defines California disaster service workers as public employees authorized to assist during emergencies under the California Emergency Services Act. It also describes the standardized emergency management system and national incident management system, which utilize the incident command system to coordinate multi-agency disaster response. The incident command system establishes clear lines of authority and allows different agencies to work together under a common organizational structure.
Law on natural disaster prevention and organizational structure for disaster ...UNDP Climate
High-level inter-ministerial workshop held in Hanoi June 6-7, 2017 hosted by the Ministry of Agricultural Development (MARD) of Viet Nam and supported under the Integrating Agriculture in National Adaptation Plans (NAP-Ag) Programme. The meeting was attended by over 75 national and provincial level government officials, including MONRE, MARD, MPI and the Ministry of Finance (MOF), UN and development partners, private sector representatives including insurance companies, as well as non-governmental organisations.
Changes in climate will also influence the future occurrence of wildfire and the area burned through various pathways that involve weather conditions conducive to combustion, fuels to burn and ignition agents. As humans manage fire in most parts of the world, the resulting changes in fire occurrence patterns will also be contingent on human activity, government policies, and institutional development. The Provincial Veld Fire Management Plan(VFRP) is aimed at healthier veld and farmlands ecosystems; communities that are less at risk from fire and smoke; and a more cost-effective fire suppression program. This contingency plan is based upon relevant provisions in the National Veld fire Strategy, National Veld and Forest Fire Act No. 101 of 1998 (as amended) and it is also intended to provide an assessment at the policy level, to support operational assessments and mitigation plans in the provincial and local spheres of government.
Karnataka is vulnerable in varying degrees to a number of disasters induced by natural as well as human causes — 50% per cent of the total area is vulnerable to drought; 22 per cent of the total geographical area is prone to earthquakes of moderate intensity; northern districts in the Krishna and Godavari basins are prone to floods and river erosion; with about 300km of coastline, most of it is prone to cyclones and coastal erosion; and six districts in the Western Ghats are at risk from landslides. Further, the vulnerability to terrorism and Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear (CBRN) disasters has also increased manifold.
1.2 Disaster Risks in Karnataka
Karnataka has been experiencing losses and damages due to various natural and human induced disasters such as drought, flood, cyclones, landslides, epidemics, etc. for a long time now. Disaster risks are further compounded by increasing vulnerabilities. These include the ever-growing population, the vast disparities in income, rapid urbanisation, increasing industrialisation, development within high-risk zones, environmental degradation, climate change, etc. All these threaten the population, national security, economy and its sustainable development. Nationally and internationally governments are taking proactive steps to prepare for such forseeable risks. Government of Karnataka takes this opportunity to issue the guidelines for the preparation of the District Plan for Disaster Management (DM) of disasters induced by natural causes as mandated by the Disaster Management Act, 2005 (DM ACT, 2005). The DM plans will build in region and hazard specific management tools in the context of regional and multi-hazard vulnerabilities.
Law on natural disaster prevention and organizational structure for disaster ...UNDP Climate
High-level inter-ministerial workshop held in Hanoi June 6-7, 2017 hosted by the Ministry of Agricultural Development (MARD) of Viet Nam and supported under the Integrating Agriculture in National Adaptation Plans (NAP-Ag) Programme. The meeting was attended by over 75 national and provincial level government officials, including MONRE, MARD, MPI and the Ministry of Finance (MOF), UN and development partners, private sector representatives including insurance companies, as well as non-governmental organisations.
Changes in climate will also influence the future occurrence of wildfire and the area burned through various pathways that involve weather conditions conducive to combustion, fuels to burn and ignition agents. As humans manage fire in most parts of the world, the resulting changes in fire occurrence patterns will also be contingent on human activity, government policies, and institutional development. The Provincial Veld Fire Management Plan(VFRP) is aimed at healthier veld and farmlands ecosystems; communities that are less at risk from fire and smoke; and a more cost-effective fire suppression program. This contingency plan is based upon relevant provisions in the National Veld fire Strategy, National Veld and Forest Fire Act No. 101 of 1998 (as amended) and it is also intended to provide an assessment at the policy level, to support operational assessments and mitigation plans in the provincial and local spheres of government.
Karnataka is vulnerable in varying degrees to a number of disasters induced by natural as well as human causes — 50% per cent of the total area is vulnerable to drought; 22 per cent of the total geographical area is prone to earthquakes of moderate intensity; northern districts in the Krishna and Godavari basins are prone to floods and river erosion; with about 300km of coastline, most of it is prone to cyclones and coastal erosion; and six districts in the Western Ghats are at risk from landslides. Further, the vulnerability to terrorism and Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear (CBRN) disasters has also increased manifold.
1.2 Disaster Risks in Karnataka
Karnataka has been experiencing losses and damages due to various natural and human induced disasters such as drought, flood, cyclones, landslides, epidemics, etc. for a long time now. Disaster risks are further compounded by increasing vulnerabilities. These include the ever-growing population, the vast disparities in income, rapid urbanisation, increasing industrialisation, development within high-risk zones, environmental degradation, climate change, etc. All these threaten the population, national security, economy and its sustainable development. Nationally and internationally governments are taking proactive steps to prepare for such forseeable risks. Government of Karnataka takes this opportunity to issue the guidelines for the preparation of the District Plan for Disaster Management (DM) of disasters induced by natural causes as mandated by the Disaster Management Act, 2005 (DM ACT, 2005). The DM plans will build in region and hazard specific management tools in the context of regional and multi-hazard vulnerabilities.
Crime In Virginia_2012 State Police ReportChuck Thompson
This PDF comes from the Virginia State Police and is ported onto here to be ported onto our news site over at Gloucester, Virginia Links and News. It's a public document available here and on the state police website.
Grand Challenges for Disaster ReductionFrancisYee1
The Grand Challenges for Disaster Reduction outlines a ten-year
strategy crafted by the National Science and Technology Council’s
Subcommittee on Disaster Reduction (SDR). It sets forth six Grand
Challenges that, when addressed, will enhance community
resilience to disasters and thus create a more disaster-resilient
Nation. These Grand Challenges require sustained Federal
investment as well as collaborations with state and local
governments, professional societies and trade associations, the
private sector, academia, and the international community to
successfully transfer disaster reduction science and technology
into common use.
To meet these Challenges, the SDR has identified priority science and technology
interagency implementation actions by hazard that build upon ongoing efforts.
Addressing these implementation actions will improve America’s capacity to prevent and
recover from disasters, thus fulfilling our Nation’s commitment to reducing the impacts
of all hazards and enhancing the safety and economic well-being of every individual
and community. This is the wildland fire-specific implementation plan. See also sdr.gov
for other hazard-specific implementation plans.
In 2015 Cambodia established the Law on Disaster Management. The objective of this law is to regulate Disaster Management in Cambodia. The Law on Disaster Management has the following goals; prevention, adaption, and mitigation in the pre-disaster period, due to natural or human-made causes; emergency response during the disaster; recovery in the post-disaster period. The act provides for the establishment of the National Committee for Disaster Management to lead, administer, and coordinate all disaster management activities.
The County Bioterrorism Annex ESF# 8.5 .docxcherry686017
The County
Bioterrorism Annex
ESF# 8.5
THIS DISASTER MANUAL REPRESENTS GENERAL GUIDELINES, WHICH CAN BE
MODIFIED BY EMERGENCY PERSONEL AS APPROPRIATE. THIS PLAN DOES NOT
CREATE ANY RIGHT OR DUTY THAT IS ENFORCEABLE IN A COURT OF LAW.
DATE Page 2
Table of Contents
DATE Page 3
Administrative
I. Purpose
This Annex of the County Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan (CEMP) is for dealing with
bioterrorism events. This is not a standalone document. Other annexes from the CEMP will be
referenced as needed. This Annex will give recommendations for all aspects of the incident cycle in
regards to a bioterrorism incident.
II. Scope
The unstable society in which we live in propels the development of this Annex. Even though
bioterrorism is not a new concept, the means and range of easily attainable items is constantly growing.
Communities are growing, making larger concentrations of potential victims. This Annex centers upon
the local responders and their roles and responsibilities. It is understood that in the event of a terrorism
event the Federal Bureau of Investigation would take control of the situation once they arrived.
III. Planning Annex Team
Title Entity
Emergency Services Coordinator Office of Emergency Services
Fire Coordinator Office of Emergency Services
Sheriff Sheriff’s Office
Chief of Police City Police
Public Health Director Public Health
Immunization Coordinator Public Health
Bioterrorism Coordinator Public Health
Director of Emergency Preparedness Local Hospital
Regional Response Manager American Red Cross
HAZMAT Coordinator Office of Emergency Services
EMS Coordinator Office of Emergency Services
Supporting Team for additional specific services
DATE Page 4
911 Coordinator Sherriff’s Office Communications
County Administrator PIO
GIS Coordinator Planning
Funeral Director DEMORT
Commissioner Social Services
Director of Community Services Mental Health
Administrative Services Director Hudson Headwaters Health Network
Chairman, BOS Elected Official
Special Agent/WMD Coordinator Federal Bureau of Investigation
IV. Authority
• New York State Executive Law Article 2-B – This authorizes the Chief Executive Official the
right to proclaim a local state of emergency and any emergency orders as necessary, during a
potentially life threatening event.
• New York State Public Health Law 2100 – This authorizes local boards of health and health
officers the right to control infectious diseases by means including isolation and quarantine.
• Presidential Decision Directive 39 – This establishes the FBI as the lead agency in terrorism
incidents; responsible for crisis management. It also establishes FEMA as the lead for
consequence management.
V. Assumptions
All incidents begin and end locally. Initially it may not be appa ...
Crime In Virginia_2012 State Police ReportChuck Thompson
This PDF comes from the Virginia State Police and is ported onto here to be ported onto our news site over at Gloucester, Virginia Links and News. It's a public document available here and on the state police website.
Grand Challenges for Disaster ReductionFrancisYee1
The Grand Challenges for Disaster Reduction outlines a ten-year
strategy crafted by the National Science and Technology Council’s
Subcommittee on Disaster Reduction (SDR). It sets forth six Grand
Challenges that, when addressed, will enhance community
resilience to disasters and thus create a more disaster-resilient
Nation. These Grand Challenges require sustained Federal
investment as well as collaborations with state and local
governments, professional societies and trade associations, the
private sector, academia, and the international community to
successfully transfer disaster reduction science and technology
into common use.
To meet these Challenges, the SDR has identified priority science and technology
interagency implementation actions by hazard that build upon ongoing efforts.
Addressing these implementation actions will improve America’s capacity to prevent and
recover from disasters, thus fulfilling our Nation’s commitment to reducing the impacts
of all hazards and enhancing the safety and economic well-being of every individual
and community. This is the wildland fire-specific implementation plan. See also sdr.gov
for other hazard-specific implementation plans.
In 2015 Cambodia established the Law on Disaster Management. The objective of this law is to regulate Disaster Management in Cambodia. The Law on Disaster Management has the following goals; prevention, adaption, and mitigation in the pre-disaster period, due to natural or human-made causes; emergency response during the disaster; recovery in the post-disaster period. The act provides for the establishment of the National Committee for Disaster Management to lead, administer, and coordinate all disaster management activities.
The County Bioterrorism Annex ESF# 8.5 .docxcherry686017
The County
Bioterrorism Annex
ESF# 8.5
THIS DISASTER MANUAL REPRESENTS GENERAL GUIDELINES, WHICH CAN BE
MODIFIED BY EMERGENCY PERSONEL AS APPROPRIATE. THIS PLAN DOES NOT
CREATE ANY RIGHT OR DUTY THAT IS ENFORCEABLE IN A COURT OF LAW.
DATE Page 2
Table of Contents
DATE Page 3
Administrative
I. Purpose
This Annex of the County Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan (CEMP) is for dealing with
bioterrorism events. This is not a standalone document. Other annexes from the CEMP will be
referenced as needed. This Annex will give recommendations for all aspects of the incident cycle in
regards to a bioterrorism incident.
II. Scope
The unstable society in which we live in propels the development of this Annex. Even though
bioterrorism is not a new concept, the means and range of easily attainable items is constantly growing.
Communities are growing, making larger concentrations of potential victims. This Annex centers upon
the local responders and their roles and responsibilities. It is understood that in the event of a terrorism
event the Federal Bureau of Investigation would take control of the situation once they arrived.
III. Planning Annex Team
Title Entity
Emergency Services Coordinator Office of Emergency Services
Fire Coordinator Office of Emergency Services
Sheriff Sheriff’s Office
Chief of Police City Police
Public Health Director Public Health
Immunization Coordinator Public Health
Bioterrorism Coordinator Public Health
Director of Emergency Preparedness Local Hospital
Regional Response Manager American Red Cross
HAZMAT Coordinator Office of Emergency Services
EMS Coordinator Office of Emergency Services
Supporting Team for additional specific services
DATE Page 4
911 Coordinator Sherriff’s Office Communications
County Administrator PIO
GIS Coordinator Planning
Funeral Director DEMORT
Commissioner Social Services
Director of Community Services Mental Health
Administrative Services Director Hudson Headwaters Health Network
Chairman, BOS Elected Official
Special Agent/WMD Coordinator Federal Bureau of Investigation
IV. Authority
• New York State Executive Law Article 2-B – This authorizes the Chief Executive Official the
right to proclaim a local state of emergency and any emergency orders as necessary, during a
potentially life threatening event.
• New York State Public Health Law 2100 – This authorizes local boards of health and health
officers the right to control infectious diseases by means including isolation and quarantine.
• Presidential Decision Directive 39 – This establishes the FBI as the lead agency in terrorism
incidents; responsible for crisis management. It also establishes FEMA as the lead for
consequence management.
V. Assumptions
All incidents begin and end locally. Initially it may not be appa ...
This power point presentation gives a brief outlook about the need of Disaster Risk Management and its Structure in India. Further, it highlights issues, challenges and suggestions regarding September, 2014 Floods in Kashmir Valley.
This is my Grand Rounds for Nationwide Children's Hospital on 9/11/14 at 8am. This talk gives the background of National and Regional Preparedness in Columbus, OH post 9/11.
This ppt is about the whole framework of Disaster Risk Management in India and its structure in India. Furthermore, it highlights the issue, challenges and suggestions regarding the September, 2014 Floods in Jammu and Kashmir state.
Jennifer Schaus and Associates hosts a complimentary webinar series on The FAR in 2024. Join the webinars on Wednesdays and Fridays at noon, eastern.
Recordings are on YouTube and the company website.
https://www.youtube.com/@jenniferschaus/videos
Jennifer Schaus and Associates hosts a complimentary webinar series on The FAR in 2024. Join the webinars on Wednesdays and Fridays at noon, eastern.
Recordings are on YouTube and the company website.
https://www.youtube.com/@jenniferschaus/videos
Russian anarchist and anti-war movement in the third year of full-scale warAntti Rautiainen
Anarchist group ANA Regensburg hosted my online-presentation on 16th of May 2024, in which I discussed tactics of anti-war activism in Russia, and reasons why the anti-war movement has not been able to make an impact to change the course of events yet. Cases of anarchists repressed for anti-war activities are presented, as well as strategies of support for political prisoners, and modest successes in supporting their struggles.
Thumbnail picture is by MediaZona, you may read their report on anti-war arson attacks in Russia here: https://en.zona.media/article/2022/10/13/burn-map
Links:
Autonomous Action
http://Avtonom.org
Anarchist Black Cross Moscow
http://Avtonom.org/abc
Solidarity Zone
https://t.me/solidarity_zone
Memorial
https://memopzk.org/, https://t.me/pzk_memorial
OVD-Info
https://en.ovdinfo.org/antiwar-ovd-info-guide
RosUznik
https://rosuznik.org/
Uznik Online
http://uznikonline.tilda.ws/
Russian Reader
https://therussianreader.com/
ABC Irkutsk
https://abc38.noblogs.org/
Send mail to prisoners from abroad:
http://Prisonmail.online
YouTube: https://youtu.be/c5nSOdU48O8
Spotify: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/libertarianlifecoach/episodes/Russian-anarchist-and-anti-war-movement-in-the-third-year-of-full-scale-war-e2k8ai4
A process server is a authorized person for delivering legal documents, such as summons, complaints, subpoenas, and other court papers, to peoples involved in legal proceedings.
This session provides a comprehensive overview of the latest updates to the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (commonly known as the Uniform Guidance) outlined in the 2 CFR 200.
With a focus on the 2024 revisions issued by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), participants will gain insight into the key changes affecting federal grant recipients. The session will delve into critical regulatory updates, providing attendees with the knowledge and tools necessary to navigate and comply with the evolving landscape of federal grant management.
Learning Objectives:
- Understand the rationale behind the 2024 updates to the Uniform Guidance outlined in 2 CFR 200, and their implications for federal grant recipients.
- Identify the key changes and revisions introduced by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) in the 2024 edition of 2 CFR 200.
- Gain proficiency in applying the updated regulations to ensure compliance with federal grant requirements and avoid potential audit findings.
- Develop strategies for effectively implementing the new guidelines within the grant management processes of their respective organizations, fostering efficiency and accountability in federal grant administration.
3. CALIFORNIA DISASTER SERVICE WORKER
Who?
California city, county, or state agency or public district employees
Authorized by?
California Emergency Services Act
Defined in the California Code
California Government Code 31 00-31 02; Labor Code 3211.92(b)
It is hereby declared that the protection of the health and safety and
preservation of the lives and property of the people of the state from the
effects of natural, manmade, or war-caused emergencies which result in
conditions of disaster or extreme peril to life, property, and resources is of
paramount state importance…in protection of its citizens and resources, all
public employees are hereby declared to be disaster service workers…
3
4. SEMS requires it…
NIMS recommends it…
More importantly… it is a Best Management Practice.
4
5. What is the Standardized Emergency Management System
(SEMS)?
What is the National Incident Management System (NIMS)?
What is the Incident Command System (ICS)? And how will
staff utilize ICS for an effective emergency response?
What is your role as an Elected Official?
5
8. Same intent to improve coordination between responding
agencies
NIMS incorporates support from:
Private Sector
Non-Government Organizations
Tribal Governments
SEMS incorporates organizational levels of response
8
9. Adopt Incident Command System (ICS) as official incident
response system.
Integrate ICS into emergency operations policies, plans and
procedures.
Conduct ICS training for responders, supervisors, and
command-level staff.
Conduct inter-agency ICS oriented exercises.
9
10. A standardized system of management and best practices for
incident management processes, protocols, and procedures for use
by all responders.
10
11. Flow of information and resources
Coordination between responding agencies
Rapid mobilization, deployment and resource tracking
11
12. Command and Management
Preparedness
Resource Management
Communications
Information Technology
Supporting Technologies
Ongoing Management and Maintenance
12
13. Life Safety
Property Protection
Coordination
Efficiency
Mutual Aid
Reimbursement
13
15. Hands On Response
MUST use Incident Command System:
Incident Commander
Incident Command Post (ICP)
Unified Command or Area Command
Request support from the Local EOC
15
16. Cities, counties & special
districts:
Manage and coordinate the
overall emergency response
and recovery activities
Implements local
emergency plans & SOPs
Supports field level activity
Requests support from Op
Area
16
17. Orange County and all political
sub-divisions
Geographical boundary of the county
Maintains Operational Area EOC
Coordinates information, resources and priorities
Makes requests to the State Regional EOC
Intermediate level of the state emergency services
organization
17
18. OC is in Southern
Region
Coordinates between
OA and State
OA to OA
Implements state
emergency plan
18
Southern Region:
Mutual Aid 1 & 6
22. Natural Disasters
Human and Animal Disease
Outbreaks
Malicious Acts
Hazardous Materials Incidents
22
23. 23
SEATTLE (Reuters) - Tuesday, April 13 - Washington State Man Arrested for Making Ricin
A Washington state man … has been arrested for making the deadly
poison ricin from castor seeds in his own home, officials said on
Tuesday.
Robert Alberg bought 4.7 pounds of castor seeds by mail and had begun
to process them into ricin when he was arrested last week, the U.S.
Attorney in Seattle said in court papers.
Ricin, a poison with no known antidote…
Robert Alberg sent several letters and e-mails to his family and friends
describing his work, saying he could now poison water supplies and that
he hoped to die on "Federal Death Row," court documents said.
"It's so exciting working with poisons perhaps I'll find a way to end all
life on Earth through some interesting items," Alberg wrote to his sister
in an e-mail last July, according to the complaint.
FBI agents also found a 14-step recipe for making ricin at Alberg's home
along with chemicals and a coffee grinder for processing the castor seeds
into pulp, which was found in jars labeled "caution ricin poison," the
complaint alleges.
24. Terrorist Threats or Attacks
National Special Security Events
Planned events
Human Error
24
26. Incident of National Significance
No request required, federal assets available, and no funding
available
Emergency Declaration
Declared by the President, federal support and potential funding
for life/safety response
Major Disaster Declaration
Declared by the president, activates disaster programs, and
recovery support.
26
27. 27
4/22/92 – Explosion Rip Mexican City, 200 dead, 600 injured - Clark Staten,
EMT-P , Emergency Net News SVC
At least nine separate explosions were heard, starting at
approximately 10:30 a.m. local time. They were said to have
ripped a jagged trench that runs for more than 1 mile. The
expanded trench was said to be contiguous with the city sewer
system, and the open holes thought to be at least 6 meters deep
and 3 meters across. In several locations, much larger craters
of 50 meters in diameter are evident.
News Source Unknown
Damage costs were est. at 75 million U.S. dollars. The sewer
explosion was traced to the installation of a water pipe, by a
contractor several years before the explosion, that leaked
water on a gasoline line laying underneath. The subsequent
corrosion of the gasoline pipeline, in turn, caused leakage of
gasoline into the sewers.
28. 28
95% of all
incidents
95% of all
incidents
Typically,
Types 1 & 2
are incidents
of national
significance.
Typically,
Types 1 & 2
are incidents
of national
significance.
29. Impacts to life, property, and the economy
Community and responder safety
Potential hazardous materials
Weather and other environmental influences
Likelihood of cascading events
Potential crime scene (including terrorism)
Political sensitivity and media relations
Area involved, jurisdictional boundaries
Availability of resources
29
32. Utilizing best practices to ensure:
The safety of responders and others.
The achievement of tactical objectives.
The efficient use of resources.
32
33. To manage all types of incidents:
Fires, hazmat, earthquakes, acts of terrorism
Parades, celebrations and concerts
Private sector emergency programs
Works well for:
Small, large and complex incidents
Single or multiple agency or jurisdiction incidents
Wide-area search and rescue
33
34. Meets the needs of incidents of any kind or size.
Allows personnel from a variety of agencies to meld rapidly into a
common management structure.
Provides logistical and administrative support to operational staff.
Is cost effective by avoiding duplication of efforts.
34
35.
36. Differs from the day-to-day, administrative organizational
structures and positions.
Unique ICS position titles and organizational structures are
designed to avoid confusion during response.
Rank may change during deployment.
A “chief” may not hold that title when deployed under an ICS
structure.
36
37. Chain of command is an orderly line of authority within the ranks of
the incident management organization.
Unity of command means that every individual has a designated
supervisor to whom he or she reports at the scene of the incident.
37
Authority
38. Provides overall leadership
Takes policy direction from the Executive/Senior Official
Delegates authority
Ensures incident safety
Establishes communications with other responding agencies
Establishes incident objectives
Oversees the Incident Action Plan
38
39. Elected Officials delegate authority to the designated
Emergency Operations Manager
The EOC Manager delegates authority to the Incident
Command in the Field
The Incident Commander has direct tactical and operational
responsibility for conducting incident management activities.
39
40. 40
Management: Overall
responsibility for the
incident. Sets objectives.
Operations: Develops the
tactical organization and
directs all resources to
carry out the Incident
Action Plan.
Planning: Develops
the Incident Action
Plan to accomplish
the objectives.
Finance/Admin:
Monitors costs
related to the
incident. Provides
overall fiscal
guidance.
Logistics: Provides
resources and all
other services
needed to support
the incident.
41. 41
Incident Command PostIncident Command Post:: Performs primary tactical-level, on-scene
incident command functions. The Incident Commander is located
at an Incident Command Post at the incident scene.
Local Emergency OperationsLocal Emergency Operations
CenterCenter:: Coordinates information
and resources to support local
incident management activities.
Area CommandArea Command:: Oversees the
management of multiple
incidents. Area Command may
be Unified, and works directly
with Incident Commanders.
Local
Emergency
Ops Center
(EOC)
Local
Emergency
Ops Center
(EOC)
Area
Command
Area
Command
Incident
Command
Post
Incident
Command
Post
Incident
Command
Post
Incident
Command
Post
Incident
Command
Post
Incident
Command
Post
42. Mobilization
Assessment of Damage
All Hands on Deck
Management by Objectives
Measurable, Attainable
42
43. Incident Action Plan
Who, What, When, and Where
Resource Management
Recovery
Restoration of Normal Services
Demobilization
43
44. The development and use of a common communications plan
The interoperability of communication equipment,
procedures, and systems
44
45. Mutual aid systems form key links when local resources are
inadequate
Mutual aid agreements help to facilitate the timely delivery of
assistance during incidents.
Voluntary & Reciprocal
Aid verses Assistance
45
46. American Red Cross & Salvation Army
Water Agency Response Network (WARN)
Orange County Emergency Management Organization
(OCEMO)
California Master Mutual Aid Agreement
Law Enforcement
Fire Department
WEROC
Public Works
46
48. Temporary by nature
Not all costs are covered
Documentation will save you
Does not provide for previously unmet needs
48
49. Open Purchase Orders/Payment Options
Contractors are impacted too!
Business Continuity Plans
Contract emergency event clauses
What number are you on their list?
After hours contact information
Know what resources exist!
50. 50
Your Agency
Neighboring Agencies
State OES - Resources from 58 counties
Op Area - County Resources & 144 entities
Region - Resources from 12 counties
Federal (Depts., Military, States)
55. Provide support to Incident Command
Resources, alerts, communications, transportation
Coordinate different levels of responders
Local, State, and Federal
Identify and resolve resource shortages and issues
Gather and coordinate information
55
56. Enables responding
agencies to manage an
incident together
Establishes common
incident objectives and
strategies
Joint decisions within a
single command structure
Maintains unity of command
56
Agency 1
Incident
Commander
Agency 2
Incident
Commander
Agency 3
Incident
Commander
57. Multiple incidents that are each being handled by an Incident
Command System organization; or
A very large incident that has multiple incident management
teams assigned to it.
Coordination
Efficiency
Area Expertise
Prioritization of Resources
57
58. Determining Factors
Type of Incident
Jurisdiction
Legal Mandates
Degree of Resource Commitment
58
59. In Charge of the Incident
Part of a Unified Command
Part of Operations
Part of Logistics
Other duties / responsibilities
59
O p e r a t io n s P la n n in g - In t e l L o g is t ic s F in a n c e - A d m in
In c id e n t
C o m m a n d
60. The Public Information
Officer (PIO):
Represents and advises the
Agency
Manages media and public
inquiries.
Elected Officials MUST
coordinate messages with
the PIO
The Joint Information
Center (JIC):
Critical emergency
information.
Crisis communications.
Public affairs functions.
60
61. What did we set out to do?
What actually happened?
Why did it happen?
What are we going to do better next time?
Are there lessons learned that should be shared?
What followup is needed?
61
64. Provide support in the form of RESOURCES !
Ensure the development of PLANS !
Prioritize Pre-Emergency MITIGATION !
64
65. Budgetary Support for Training
Support / Participate in Exercises
Ensure Organizational Readiness
65
66. Ensure clear policy direction for EOC Managers
Delegation of Authority
Policy Limitations
66
67. Preparedness Actions
Designation of Director of Emergency Services
Emergency Proclamation, Declaration, and Ratification
Finance and Purchasing Powers
67
68. Provide Policy Direction
Delegate Authority
Empower your staff to implement your policies
Ensure adequate staffing and resources
Be a Community Leader
Political Liaison
Keep the public informed
Representative to your constituents
Media Spokesperson
68
69. Elected Official’s Role
Policy
Mission
Direction
Authority
Incident Commander’s Role
Manages the incident at the
scene.
Keeps you informed on all
important matters
pertaining to the incident.
69
Chain of Command MUST be followed to maintain the
unity of command and safety of responders.
70. Where:
Emergency Operations Center
Policy Room
Incident Command Post (ICP)
OR
Stay Home
What do you do?
Check-in
Receive a Briefing
Review Policy
70
72. Reason #1:
Not Understanding the Scope of Emergency Management
Reason #2:
Lack of Management Participation and Support of Planning and
Training Efforts
72
76. “Don’t confuse a plan with execution. A plan is good intentions.
You don’t win with good intentions.” – Lt General Russel
Honore – Commander, Joint Task Force Katrina
76
82. Houghton Mifflin
Disaster
An occurrence causing widespread destruction and distress;
A grave misfortune.
Catastrophe
A great, often sudden calamity.
A complete failure;
A sudden violent change in the earth's surface;
OC has NOT been tested
82
We heard so much talk during Hurricane Katrina as to who was in charge and who was to blame. Everyone was pointing fingers at everyone else.
Your “911” dispatch center, is the one that gets the call. The disaster happens in your jurisdiction, so your field response (police, fire, public works, etc.) is going to be the first to respond. You are not going to wait for someone else to come in to take charge.
Photo on left – train derailment in City of Commerce
Some incidents that begin with a single response discipline within a single jurisdiction may rapidly expand to a multidiscipline, multi-jurisdictional incident requiring significant outside resources and operational support.
Photo on right – New Orleans
And there are literally thousands of disasters every year where FEMA never shows up. It is your disaster!
And, long after any mutual aid or state or federal resources have packed up and gone home, your jurisdiction is the one that is doing the clean up, rebuilding and dealing with other recovery issues and with FEMA
Q11, also accept JIS
Summarize the additional information about the NIMS requirement regarding “Institutionalizing the Use of ICS”:
According to the NIMS Integration Center, "institutionalizing the use of ICS" means that government officials, incident managers, and emergency response organizations at all jurisdictional levels must adopt the Incident Command System. Actions to institutionalize the use of ICS take place at two levels: policy and organizational/operational.
At the policy level, institutionalizing the ICS means government officials (i.e., governors, mayors, county and city managers, tribal leaders, and others) must:
Adopt the ICS through executive order, proclamation, or legislation as the jurisdiction's official incident response system; and
Direct that incident managers and response organizations in their jurisdictions train, exercise, and use the ICS in their response operations.
At the organizational/operational level, evidence that incident managers and emergency response organizations are institutionalizing the ICS would include the following:
ICS is being integrated into functional and system-wide emergency operations policies, plans, and procedures.
ICS training is planned or underway for responders, supervisors, and command-level officers.
Responders at all levels are participating in and/or coordinating ICS-oriented exercises that involve responders from multiple disciplines and jurisdictions.
Additional information about NIMS can be found online at www.fema.gov/nims.
Present the following key points:
NIMS provides a consistent framework for incident management at all jurisdictional levels regardless of the cause, size, or complexity of the incident. Building upon the Incident Command System (ICS), NIMS provides the Nation’s first responders and authorities with the same foundation for incident management for terrorist attacks, natural disasters, and other emergencies. NIMS requires that ICS be institutionalized.
The NRP is an all-discipline, all-hazards plan for the management of domestic incidents. Using the template established by NIMS, the NRP provides the structure and mechanisms to coordinate and integrate incident management activities and emergency support functions across Federal, State, local, and tribal government entities, the private sector, and nongovernmental organizations.
Explain that ICS is only one facet of NIMS. Note that NIMS integrates existing best practices into a consistent, nationwide approach to domestic incident management that is applicable at all jurisdictional levels and across functional disciplines in an all-hazards context.
Following is a synopsis of each major component of NIMS.
Command and Management. NIMS standard incident command structures are based on three key organizational systems:
ICS. ICS defines the operating characteristics, interactive management components, and structure of incident management and emergency response organizations engaged throughout the incident life-cycle.
Multiagency Coordination Systems. These define the operating characteristics, interactive management components, and organizational structure of supporting incident management entities engaged at the Federal, State, local, tribal, and regional levels through mutual aid agreements and other assistance arrangements.
Public Information Systems. These refer to processes, procedures, and systems for communicating timely and accurate information to the public during crisis or emergency situations.
Preparedness. Effective incident management begins with a host of preparedness activities conducted on a “steady-state” basis, well in advance of any potential incident.
Resource Management. NIMS defines standardized mechanisms and establishes requirements for processes to describe, inventory, mobilize, dispatch, track, and recover resources over the life-cycle of an incident.
Communications and Information Management. NIMS identifies the requirement for a standardized framework for communications, information management (collection, analysis, and dissemination), and information sharing at all levels of incident management.
Supporting Technologies. Technology and technological systems provide supporting capabilities essential to implementing and continuously refining NIMS.
Ongoing Management and Maintenance. This component establishes an activity to provide strategic direction for and oversight of NIMS.
SEMS requires use of ICS at the field level.
The field level is where emergency response personnel make tactical decisions and conduct activities under the command of an Incident Commander who works from an Incident Command Post.
In a large scale event, like an earthquake, there might be more than one ICP.
The field level will request and coordinate resources through the city EOC.
Local government refers to cities, counties and special districts such as water districts and school districts.
From their EOCs and Department Operating Centers (DOCs), local governments manage and coordinate the overall emergency response and recovery activities within their jurisdiction.
Cities need to use their Emergency Operations Plans (EOPs) for EOC operations and Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) for response operations—i.e., traffic control, evacuation plans, mass care plans, etc.
Local government shall use SEMS when the City EOC is activated and when a Local Emergency is proclaimed.
The city EOC is responsible for providing all support for field activities. If the needs can’t be met at the local level, the requests will be sent to the next level, the Operational Area.
Under SEMS, the Operational Area is the geographical boundaries of the County and includes Los Angeles County, all cities (88), unincorporated areas and special districts (277+).
Our Op Area and County EOC is located on Eastern Ave. in East LA. It is activated jointly by Office of Emergency Management and Sheriff. The Sheriff is the lead during disasters.
The Op Area EOC coordinates information flow between county depts., cities and school districts. These agencies send status reports and request resources to the Op Area via the Emergency Management Information System (EMIS) which is an internet based system which ties these agencies together. Back-ups for EMIS includes a satellite dish and computer, amateur radios, and making contact with the contact Sheriff’s station.
Resource requests are made to the Op Area. If the Op Area can’t fill the requests, it will send requests to the Regional EOC (REOC) of the OES.
The Op Area is the intermediate level of the state emergency services organization. The cities go to the state through the Op Area.
The Op Area EOC must activate for support when requested by a jurisdiction – may be a low-level activation to monitor the situation.
Because of its size and geography, the state has been divided into six Mutual Aid Regions in order to coordinate mutual aid and other emergency related activities. The Office of Emergency Services (OES) also has three Administrative Regional Offices.
The cities of Los Angeles County falls within Mutual Aid Region I and the Southern Administrative Region. The Southern Region EOC and administrative offices are located at the Armed Forces Reserve Center in Los Alamitos.
In SEMS, the regional level manages and coordinates information and resources among operational areas within the mutual aid region and also between the operational areas and the state level.
The regional level also coordinates overall state agency support for emergency response activities within the region.
The Southern Region will also coordinate with FEMA on behalf of the cities and operational areas.
The regional level EOC shall be activated and SEMS used when any operational area EOC within the mutual aid region is activated.
The state level of SEMS manages state resources in response to the emergency needs of the other levels and coordinates mutual aid among the mutual aid regions and between the regional level and state level. The state level also serves as the coordination and communication link between the state and the federal disaster response system. The State level will activate its EOC and use SEMS when:
A regional level EOC is activated.
The governor proclaims a state of emergency.
The governor proclaims an earthquake or volcanic prediction.
Explain that an incident is an occurrence, caused by either human or natural phenomena, that requires response actions to prevent or minimize loss of life, or damage to property and/or the environment.
Present examples of recent incidents that have affected your jurisdiction.
Add the following points:
The vast majority of incidents are handled on a daily basis by a single jurisdiction at the local level. However, there are instances when incident management must involve multiple jurisdictions, functional agencies, and emergency responder disciplines.
Large, complex incidents require effective and efficient coordination across this broad spectrum of organizations and activities.
Even when State and Federal assistance is provided, all incidents begin and end with the local government taking responsibility for the safety and recovery of their citizens.
Note that any incident can have a mix of political, economic, social, environmental, and cost implications with potentially serious long-term effects. Also, more and more incidents are multiagency and/or multijurisdictional. As the Executive or Senior Official, you need to be aware of how ICS and interagency (regional) multiagency coordination systems can work to ensure cooperative response efforts.
Refer to the following examples of the types of incidents that have been managed using ICS:
Fire, both structural and wildland
Natural disasters, such as tornadoes, floods, ice storms, or earthquakes
Human and animal disease outbreaks
Search and rescue missions
Hazardous materials incidents
Criminal acts and crime scene investigations
Terrorist incidents, including the use of weapons of mass destruction
National Special Security Events, such as Presidential visits or the Super Bowl
Other planned events, such as parades or demonstrations
Review the following best practice or add an example from your jurisdiction: The greater Boston area conducts special events as “planned disasters” by employing ICS and integrating portions of the region’s disaster plans into the event’s operations plans. This approach improves coordination during event planning and operations, strengthens relationships between the many agencies and organizations involved in disaster operations, and facilitates the enhancement of regional disaster plans. The Boston area uses ICS to conduct its three regularly occurring events (First Night festivities, the Boston Marathon, and Fourth of July celebrations) and one to two special events (e.g., Super Bowl rallies and Sail Boston) as “planned disasters.” Many of these events can attract crowds of one million or more participants and spectators, providing an optimal environment to test and improve disaster plans.
Refer to the illustration on the visual, which shows that incident typing is based on the number of resources and the time span (number of operational periods).
Type 5 Incident: The incident can be handled by one or two single resources with up to six personnel. Command and General Staff positions (other than the Incident Commander) are not activated. No written Incident Action Plan (IAP) is required. The incident is contained within the first operational period and often within an hour to a few hours after resources arrive on scene. Examples: vehicle fire, an injured person, a police traffic stop, etc.
Type 4 Incident: Command Staff and General Staff functions are activated only if needed. Several resources are required to mitigate the incident. The incident is usually limited to one operational period in the control phase. The Executive/Senior Official may have briefings, and ensure the complexity analysis and delegation of authority are updated. No written IAP is required. Examples: structural fire in a townhouse complex, multivehicle accident with fatalities/critical injuries, etc.
Type 3 Incident: When capabilities exceed initial attack, the appropriate ICS positions should be added to match the complexity of the incident. Some or all of the Command and General Staff positions may be activated. The incident may extend into multiple operational periods. A written IAP may be required for each operational period. Examples: bank robber holding hostage, large hazmat release, etc.
Type 2 Incident: A Type 2 incident may require the response of resources out of area, including regional and/or national resources to effectively manage the operations and command and general staffing. Most or all of the Command and General Staff positions are filled. The incident extends beyond the capabilities for local control and the incident is expected to go into multiple operational periods. A written IAP is required for each operational period. Examples: cargo jet has crashed with injuries onboard and on the ground, regional flooding, etc.
Type 1 Incident: This type of incident is the most complex, requiring national resources to safely and effectively manage and operate. All Command and General Staff positions are activated. Examples: terrorist attack, major hurricane, tri-State flooding, earthquake, etc.
Ask the participants to review the following complexity factors listed on the visual:
Impacts to life, property, and the economy
Community and responder safety
Potential hazardous materials
Weather and other environmental influences
Likelihood of cascading events (events that trigger other events)
Potential crime scene (including terrorism)
Political sensitivity, external influences, and media relations
Area involved, jurisdictional boundaries
Availability of resources
Ask the participants if there are additional factors that they would add to this list.
Explain that the Incident Commander develops incident objectives—the statement of what is to be accomplished on the incident. Not all incident objectives have the same importance.
Incident objectives can be prioritized using the following simple LIP mnemonic:
Life Safety: Objectives that deal with immediate threats to the safety of the public and responders are the first priority.
Incident Stabilization: Objectives that contain the incident to keep it from expanding, and objectives that control the incident to eliminate or mitigate the cause are the second priority.
Property/Environmental Conservation: Objectives that deal with issues of protecting public and private property, or damage to the environment, are the third priority.
Explain that Incident objectives are not necessarily completed in sequence determined by priority. It may be necessary to complete an objective related to incident stabilization before a life safety objective can be completed. Using the LIP mnemonic helps prioritize incident objectives. This device can also be used to prioritize multiple incidents, with those incidents with significant life safety issues being given a higher priority than those with lesser or no life safety issues.
Ask the participants for examples of each type of priority. Present examples based on your experience.
Elaborate on the points on the visual using the information below:
The Incident Command System, or ICS, is a standardized, on-scene, all-hazard incident management concept. ICS allows its users to adopt an integrated organizational structure to match the complexities and demands of single or multiple incidents without being hindered by jurisdictional boundaries.
ICS has considerable internal flexibility. It can grow or shrink to meet different needs. This flexibility makes it a very cost-effective and efficient management approach for both small and large situations.
ICS was developed in the 1970s following a series of catastrophic fires in California's urban interface. Property damage ran into the millions, and many people died or were injured. The personnel assigned to determine the causes of this disaster studied the case histories and discovered that response problems could rarely be attributed to lack of resources or failure of tactics.
Surprisingly, studies found that response problems were far more likely to result from inadequate management than from any other single reason. Weaknesses in incident management were often due to:
Lack of accountability, including unclear chains of command and supervision.
Poor communication due to both inefficient uses of available communications systems and conflicting codes and terminology.
Lack of an orderly, systematic planning process.
No common, flexible, predesigned management structure that enables commanders to delegate responsibilities and manage workloads efficiently.
No predefined methods to integrate interagency requirements into the management structure and planning process effectively.
A poorly managed incident response can be devastating to our economy and our health and safety.
Emphasize that by using management best practices, ICS helps to ensure:
The safety of responders and others.
The achievement of tactical objectives.
The efficient use of resources.
Review the following best practice or add an example from your jurisdiction: Southern California Firestorm 2003: Report for the Wildland Fire Lessons Learned Center reports that the use of Critical Incident Stress Debriefing (CISD) can help protect responder safety and welfare. A CISD team was ordered on day two of the incident. The team organized at a drop-in center. Twenty to 30 people per hour visited the CISD team members. On another incident, roughly 1,800 people took advantage of the availability of CISD staff to just release stress. Data from similar incidents indicate that CISD services are important for up to 2 years after significant traumatic stress situations. What resources and plans do you have for ensuring the safety and welfare of your responders?
NIMS requires that responses to all incidents use a common management structure—ICS. ICS is a proven system that is used widely for incident management by firefighters, rescuers, emergency medical teams, and hazardous materials teams.
ICS has been tested for more than 30 years and is used for planned events, fires, hazardous materials spills and multi-casualty incidents; multi-jurisdictional and multi-agency disasters, such as earthquakes, hurricanes, and winter storms; search and rescue missions; biological outbreaks and disease containment; and acts of terrorism.
CLICK MOUSE - In addition to responding to incidents, ICS can be used to plan parades, celebrations, concerts – the Rose Parade is a good example.
CLICK MOUSE – ICS can be used for everything from single traffic accidents to a major transportation incident.
The private sector also uses the ICS.
Explain that ICS is designed to be interdisciplinary and organizationally flexible.Point out that ICS:
Meets the needs of incidents of any kind or size.
Allows personnel from a variety of agencies to meld rapidly into a common management structure.
Provides logistical and administrative support to operational staff.
Is cost effective by avoiding duplication of efforts.
Ask the participants if they can add any benefits to those listed on the visual. Add a personal experience that illustrates the benefits of using ICS.Summarize by noting that any incident can have a mix of political, economic, social, environmental, and cost implications with potentially serious long-term effects. ICS, as a management system, helps to mitigate the risks by providing accurate information, strict accountability, and planning for any incident. Executives and Senior Officials must support of ICS planning, preparedness, and training activities is critical.
Use this visual to transition to the next section of the presentation, which covers the ICS organization and features. Explain that this part of the briefing will discuss the relationship between the ICS organizational structure and the role of the Executive/Senior Official.
Explain that the ICS organization differs from the day-to-day, administrative organizational structures and positions.
Unique ICS position title and organizational structures are used. There is no correlation with the administrative structure of any other agency or jurisdiction. This organization’s uniqueness helps to avoid confusion over different position titles and organizational structures.
Rank may change. Someone who serves as a chief every day may not hold that title when deployed under an ICS structure.
Explain that within the ICS organization, chain of command and unity of command are maintained. Review the following definitions:
Chain of command refers to the orderly line of authority within the ranks of the incident management organization.
Unity of command means that every individual has a designated supervisor to whom he or she reports at the scene of the incident.
These principles clarify reporting relationships and eliminate the confusion caused by multiple, conflicting directives. Incident managers at all levels must be able to control the actions of all personnel under their supervision.
Emphasize that chain of command must be followed at the incident site and by those not deployed to the incident. After being deployed and receiving an incident assignment, personnel may be assigned by someone who is not their day-to-day supervisor. In this situation, the responders must take direction from their on-scene ICS supervisors only. In addition, someone who is a day-to-day supervisor may not be assigned or qualified to serve as an on-scene supervisor.
Ask the participants: What can Executives and Senior Officials do to ensure that chain of command is maintained?
If not mentioned by the participants, add the following key points:
Ensure that only qualified supervisors are assigned.
Follow the chain of command by working through the Incident Commander rather than calling personnel within the ranks.
Explain that the Incident Commander:
Provides the overall leadership for incident response. The Incident Commander is in charge of overall management of the incident and must be fully qualified to manage the incident.
Takes policy direction from the Executive/Senior Official.
Delegates authority to others to manage the ICS organization.
Ensures the safety of incident responders and the public.
Provides information to internal and external stakeholders.
Establishes and maintains liaison with other agencies participating in the incident.
Establishes incident objectives.
Directs the development of the Incident Action Plan.
Note that the Incident Command will size up the incident and assess resource needs. If the incident is complex and/or long term, more staff may be needed. In addition, a Deputy Incident Commander may be assigned. Note that if a Deputy is assigned, he or she must be fully qualified to assume the Incident Commander’s position.
Explain that Executives/Senior Officials delegate authority to the designated Incident Commander for on-scene operations. The Incident Commander is accountable to the Executive/Senior Official but has the complete authority to direct the operation.
Emphasize that direct tactical and operational responsibility for conducting incident management activities rests with the Incident Commander, while the Executive/Senior Official plays a vital coordination role.
Point out that there is a different between command and coordination. Review the following definitions:
Command: The act of directing, ordering, or controlling by virtue of explicit statutory, regulatory, or delegated authority. In NIMS, responsibility for this process is delegated to the on-scene Incident Commander by the Executive/Senior Official. Examples of command activities include:
Determining incident objectives.
Establishing operational periods.
Assigning and supervising field resources.
Coordinate: To advance systematically an analysis and exchange of information among principals who have or may have a need to know certain information to carry out specific incident management responsibilities. Coordination includes the activities that ensure that the ICS organization(s) receive the resources and support they need when they need them. Coordination takes place in a number of entities and at all levels of government. Examples of coordination activities include:
Adjusting agency budgets, policies, and work priorities to make funds and resources available.
Facilitating interagency decisionmaking.
Coordinating interagency public information.
Dispatching additional resources.
Facilitate a discussion of the importance of keeping command and coordination roles clear by asking the following discussion question: Why is it important to keep the command role solely with the Incident Command?
Acknowledge the participants’ input and add any personal experiences that illustrate the teaching points.
Present the following key points:
The Incident Commander is responsible for establishing incident objectives.
The Operations Section Chief is responsible for managing all tactical operations at an incident. The Incident Action Plan provides the necessary guidance. The need to expand the Operations Section is generally dictated by the number of tactical resources involved and is influenced by span of control considerations.
The Planning Section Chief is responsible for providing planning services for the incident. Under the direction of the Planning Section Chief, the Planning Section collects situation and resources status information, evaluates it, and processes the information for use in developing action plans. Dissemination of information can be in the form of the Incident Action Plan, in formal briefings, or through map and status board displays.
The Logistics Section Chief provides all incident support needs with the exception of logistics support to air operations.
The Finance/Administration Section Chief is responsible for managing all financial aspects of an incident. Not all incidents will require a Finance/Administration Section. Only when the involved agencies have a specific need for finance services will the Section be activated.
Remind the participants that command structures direct on-scene emergency management. Review the following command structures:
Incident Command Post: Performs primary tactical-level, on-scene incident command functions. The Incident Commander is located at an Incident Command Post at the incident scene.
Area Command: Oversees the management of multiple incidents. Area Command may be Unified, and works directly with Incident Commanders.
Local Emergency Operations Center: Coordinates information and resources to support local incident management activities.
Source: National Response Plan
Explain to the group that another important feature of ICS is the use of integrated communications. Incident communications are facilitated through:
The development and use of a common communications plan.
The interoperability of communication equipment, procedures, and systems.
Emphasize the importance of developing an integrated voice and data communications system (equipment, systems, and protocols) before an incident.
Point out that effective ICS communications include the following three elements:
Modes: The "hardware" systems that transfer information.
Planning: Planning for the use of all available communications resources.
Networks: The procedures and processes for transferring information internally and externally.
Mutual Aid is defined as a “voluntary and reciprocal agreement” meaning you come help me today and I will come help you when you need it!
The use of mutual aid is a basic emergency management concept we have been using in California since 1950 through the CA Master Mutual Aid Agreement. Discipline specific mutual aid plans include: Fire and Rescue, Law Enforcement, Coroners, and Emergency Managers. These are provided without expectation of reimbursement.
When local resources are not enough to handle the incident, mutual aid can be requested through the LA County Op Area or through other normal mutual aid channels. Mutual aid includes: personnel services, equipment, supplies and facilities.
Other agreements for assistance include Memorandums of Understandings (MOUs) with the Red Cross, Salvation Army and other non-governmental organizations on a national level, water agencies working together as well as public utilities.
Partners in Preparedness is local government teaming together with private partners in preparedness activities.
Agreements between states include the Civil Defense Compact which has been in existence for many years (California, Arizona, Nevada and Oregon are partners in mutual aid) in various forms and the new EMAC of which California is now a part.
EMAC allows California the ability to send or receive assistance from other states during a disaster and augments resources that would be needed during a disaster. EMAC was used by California for the first time during Hurricane Katrina.
For mutual aid or other needed resources, cities need to follow the SEMS structure.
If your city is impacted and you need resources, your first call should be to your neighboring cities with whom you have already built up relationships and perhaps agreements.
Then your requests should go to the Op Area who can try to find resources from the County departments and the other 87 cities.
If the Op Area cannot fill your request, they will go to the OES Southern Region EOC (REOC) who is the coordinator for resources from their 12 counties.
If the request cannot be filled from those resources, the REOC will send the request on up to the State EOC (SOC) who can request resources from all 58 counties.
If federal resources are needed, the state requests these on behalf of the cities.
Explain that the next part of the presentation focuses on coordination and incident management assessment.
Introduce this topic by telling participants that early in the development of ICS, it was recognized that many incidents crossed jurisdictional boundaries or the limits of individual agency functional responsibility.
Present the following key points:
In many emergencies, agencies have statutory responsibilities at incidents that extend beyond political jurisdictional boundaries. Many larger emergencies will involve two or more political subdivisions. It may be essential to establish a multiagency coordination system to assist the coordination efforts on an area or regional basis.
The National Incident Management System (NIMS) describes multiagency coordination (MAC) systems as: “a combination of facilities, equipment, personnel, procedures, and communications integrated into a common system with responsibility for coordinating and supporting domestic incident management activities.”
The NIMS also states, “The primary functions of multiagency coordination systems are to support incident management policies and priorities, facilitate logistics support and resource tracking, inform resource allocation decisions using incident management priorities, coordinate incident related information, and coordinate interagency and intergovernmental issues regarding incident management policies, priorities, and strategies.”
A multiagency coordination system is not a physical location or facility. Rather, a multiagency coordination system includes all components involved in managing events or incidents. A multiagency coordination system may include:
On-scene command structure and responders.
Resource coordination centers.
Coordination entities/groups.
Emergency Operations Centers (EOCs).
Dispatch.
Present the following key points:
An Emergency Operations Center (EOC) is a predesignated facility established by a political subdivision or an agency to coordinate the overall response and support to an emergency.
Multiagency coordination centers/EOCs, as defined in NIMS, provide central locations for operational information sharing and resource coordination in support of on-scene efforts. The multiagency coordination center/EOC will serve as headquarters during the emergency and is the focal point for policy and related decisionmaking and jurisdictional resource allocation.
The role of the multiagency coordination centers/EOCs is often related to the size or complexity of the jurisdiction involved. The most common roles include:
Providing support (resources, communications, alerts, transportation) to Incident Command.
Coordinating different levels of responders (local, State, and Federal).
Identifying and resolving resource shortages and issues.
Gathering and coordinating information.
Note: When Area Command is not in effect, the coordination relationship is directly between the EOC and the Incident Command.
Explain that Unified Command:
Enables all responsible agencies to manage an incident together by establishing a common set of incident objectives and strategies.
Allows Incident Commanders to make joint decisions by establishing a single command structure.
Maintains unity of command. Each employee only reports to one supervisor.
Summarize the following key points about Unified Command:
Unified Command is an important element in multijurisdictional or multiagency domestic incident management. It provides guidelines to enable agencies with different legal, geographic, and functional responsibilities to coordinate, plan, and interact effectively.
As a team effort, the Unified Command overcomes much of the inefficiency and duplication of effort that can occur when agencies from different functional and geographic jurisdictions, or agencies at different levels of government, operate without a common system or organizational framework.
All agencies with jurisdictional authority or functional responsibility for any or all aspects of an incident and those able to provide specific resource support participate in the Unified Command structure and contribute to the process of determining overall incident strategies, selecting objectives, and ensuring that joint tactical planning occurs.
No agency's legal authorities will be compromised or neglected.
Note: Agency is used to describe organizations that have a legal and functional responsibility at an incident. The graphic depicts three Incident Commanders (Incident Commander #1 for firefighting, Incident Commander #2 for the law enforcement investigation, and Incident Commander #3 for Search and Rescue Operations.) This graphic is simply a representation of how multiple commanders may be assigned. In another situation, the Incident Commanders could be from different jurisdictions rather than from different departments within the same jurisdiction.
Present the following key points:
Area Command is used when there are a number of incidents generally in the same area and often of the same kind. Examples include two or more hazardous materials spills, fires, etc. Often these kinds of incidents will vie for the same resources.
When an incident expands to a large geographic area, the agency officials may choose to divide the incident into smaller pieces, called zones, each of which will be managed by an Incident Management Team (IMT).
When incidents are of different kinds and/or do not have similar resource demands, they will usually be handled as separate incidents or will be coordinated through an Emergency Operations Center (EOC).
Explain that the use of an Area Command makes the jobs of Incident Commanders and agency officials easier for the following reasons:
Much of the cross-incident coordination typically performed by each Incident Commander is accomplished at the Area Command level. Using an Area Command allows the Incident Commanders and their incident management teams to focus their attention on their incident objectives, strategies, and tactics.
Area Command sets priorities between incidents and ensures efficient resource use. Critical resources are allocated by the overall priorities established by the agency officials. Competition among incidents for critical resources is avoided. Often, agency dispatchers will recognize cross-incident coordination problems first.
Area Command ensures that agency policies, priorities, constraints, and guidance are being made known to the Incident Commanders and implemented consistently across incidents.
Area Command also reduces the workload of the Executive/Senior Officials, especially if there are multiple incidents going on at the same time.
Present the following key points:
The Public Information Officer (PIO) is responsible for interfacing with the public and media and/or with other agencies with incident-related information requirements. The PIO develops accurate and complete information on the incident's cause, size, and current situation; resources committed; and other matters of general interest for both internal and external consumption. The PIO may also perform a key public information-monitoring role. Only one incident PIO should be designated. Assistants may be assigned from other agencies or departments involved. The Incident Commander must approve the release of all incident-related information.
The PIO coordinates through the Joint Information Center (JIC). The JIC is a facility established to coordinate all incident-related public information activities. It is the central point of contact for all news media at the scene of the incident. Public information officials from all participating agencies should collocate at the JIC.
Ask the participants why the JIC is a critical component within the multiagency coordination system. Facilitate a discussion based on your experiences and the participants’ input.
Source: National Incident Management System
Present the following key points:
An After-Action Review (AAR) is conducted to identify what was supposed to happen, what actually happened, why it happened, and how to sustain strengths and improve weaknesses. An assessment may be conducted at the end of an incident or at the completion of a major milestone.
The AAR should not be conducted as a critique. An effective AAR:
Is not judgmental or punitive, and does not judge success or failure.
Focuses on why things happened.
Encourages participants to identify and capture important lessons.
An AAR may be either formal or informal.
Formal AAR. A formal AAR is more structured, requires planning, and takes longer to conduct. A neutral third party should facilitate a formal AAR.
Informal AAR. Informal AARs are less structured, require much less preparation and planning, and can be conducted anywhere, anytime, for any incident, by anyone.
Whether formal or informal, an AAR should seek answers to the following questions:
What did we set out to do?
What actually happened?
Why did it happen?
What are we going to do better next time?
Are there lessons learned that should be shared?
What followup is needed?
Preparedness is a key phase of the emergency management cycle. Through preparedness, jurisdictions take actions to prevent, mitigate, respond to and recover from emergencies.
Use the visual to summarize the different roles assumed by the Executive/Senior Official and Incident Commander. Add the following key points:
The Executive’s/Senior Official’s task is to ensure that you are informed and that your Incident Commander is functioning in a responsible manner. You set policy, establish the mission to be accomplished, shape the overall direction, and give the trained responders the authority to accomplish the incident objectives.
The Incident Commander is the primary person in charge at the incident. In addition to managing the incident scene, he or she is trained to keep you informed and up to date on all important matters pertaining to the incident.Present the following example or add one from your jurisdiction: The Washington area sniper case was one of the most infamous crimes in recent law enforcement history, instilling fear in thousands of people. According to the after-action report, communication was clearly the most compelling concern in the sniper case. Investigations of this kind succeed or fail based on executives’ ability to effectively manage and communicate information in a timely manner. Incident Commanders must balance the incident needs with the obligations of local executives to be responsive to their citizens. In the words of one police chief, “You cannot expect leaders to stop leading.”The final responsibility for the resolution of the incident remains with the chief elected official, chief executive officer, or agency administrator. It is imperative then that the chief elected official, chief executive officer, or agency administrator remain an active participant, supporter, supervisor, and evaluator of the Incident Commander.
Summarize the discussion by noting that the ICS hierarchy of command must be maintained. After you have clearly articulated the policy you wish followed and delegated certain authorities, the Incident Commander who reports to you will have the necessary authority and guidance to manage the incident.