SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Semantic Memory
I. Introduction to
Semantic Memory
A. What is semantic memory?
1. Permanent memory store of our world
knowledge
2. Different from episodic memory – no
representation of when or where we learned
the information
3. Examples
• What is the capitol of Colorado?
• How many legs does a horse have?
• What color is a canary?
I. Introduction to
Semantic Memory
B. Key questions:
1. How is information stored?
2. What is the nature of the
representation?
3. How is information learned?
4. How is information retrieved?
I. Introduction to
Semantic Memory
C. New terminology
1. Concepts
• Mental representations
• Often “the fundamental unit of thought”
• “An idea that includes all that is characteristically
associated with it” (Medin, 1989)
2. Proposition
• The relationship between concepts
• E.G.
– A canary is yellow
– A canary is a bird
– A bird has wings
– A bird is an animal
II. The Collins & Quillian
Hierarchical Model
A. Key Properties
1. Network: An interrelated set of concepts
/ body of knowledge.
2. Node: A point or location in the network
representing a single concept.
3. Pathways: associations between
concepts (propositions) that are
directional.
II. The Collins & Quillian
Model
A. Key Properties
3. Pathways: associations between
concepts (propositions) that are
directional.
• “ISA” pathways denote category
membership – “Canary is a bird”
• Property pathways describe properties of
concepts “Bird has feathers”
Sample Portion of the
Semantic Network
II. The Collins & Quillian
Model
B. Spreading Activation
1. The mental activity of accessing and retrieving
information from the network.
2. Takes passive concepts (those not currently in
working memory) and activates them (puts
them in working memory).
3. Activation then spreads to related nodes (e.g.,
activation to the doctor node would also
spread to the nurse node).
II. The Collins & Quillian
Model
C. Key Features of the Model
1. Hierarchical – concepts are arranged in
a hierarchy
2. This allows for cognitive economy –
removes any redundancy
3. Takes time for activation to spread
across inactive nodes
4. Activation spreads quickly across
recently activated nodes
Sample Portion of the
Semantic Network
III. Smith’s Feature
Comparison Model
A. General Structure
1. Information about concepts are
represented as feature lists
2. These lists include both defining
features and characteristic features
• Defining features are essential to the
meaning of a concept
• Characteristic features are common, but not
essential to the meaning of a concept
III. Smith’s Feature
Comparison Model
2. These lists include
both defining
features and
characteristic
features
• Defining features are
essential to the
meaning of a concept
• Characteristic features
are common, but not
essential to the
meaning of a concept
Robin
Physical object
Living
Animate
Feathered
Red breasted
III. Smith’s Feature
Comparison Model
2. These lists include
both defining
features and
characteristic
features
• Defining features are
essential to the
meaning of a concept
• Characteristic features
are common, but not
essential to the
meaning of a concept
Robin
Eats worms
Roosts in trees
III. Smith’s Feature
Comparison Model
2. These lists include
both defining
features and
characteristic
features
• Defining features are
essential to the
meaning of a concept
• Characteristic features
are common, but not
essential to the
meaning of a concept
Leos
Born between July 23
and August 22
III. Smith’s Feature
Comparison Model
2. These lists include
both defining
features and
characteristic
features
• Defining features are
essential to the
meaning of a concept
• Characteristic features
are common, but not
essential to the
meaning of a concept
Leos
Loyal
Self-assured
Charming
Generous
Opinionated
Overbearing
Proud
III. Smith’s Feature
Comparison Model
A. General Structure
1. Information about concepts are
represented as feature lists
2. These lists include both defining
features and characteristic features
3. Features are stored starting with most
defining followed by most characteristic
Sample Feature Lists
III. Smith’s Feature
Comparison Model
B. Feature Comparison
1. Models are often tested using sentence
verification tasks – e.g. a ROBIN is a
BIRD
2. The model begins with Stage 1 – global
feature comparison
• ‘Fast yes’ responses occur when there is a
large number of shared features
• ‘Fast no’ responses occur when there are
few shared features
A ROBIN is a BIRD…
III. Smith’s Feature
Comparison Model
B. Feature Comparison
2. The model begins with Stage 1 – global
feature comparison
• ‘Fast yes’ responses occur when there is a
large number of shared features
• ‘Fast no’ responses occur when there are
few shared features
• Intermediate comparisons (some shared,
some not shared) move to a Stage 2
Comparison of Defining Features
Feature Comparison
III. Smith’s Feature
Comparison Model
B. Feature Comparison
2. The model begins with Stage 1 – global
feature comparison
• Intermediate comparisons (some shared,
some not shared) move to a Stage 2
Comparison of Defining Features
• When the defining features match, a ‘slow
yes’ response is given
• When there is a feature mismatch, a ‘slow
no’ response is given
Feature Comparison
IV. Direct Comparisons of
Models – Central Themes
A. The Principle of Cognitive Economy
1. A primary assumption of the
Hierarchical Model is cognitive economy
– only non-redundant facts are stored
2. The members of a category inherit the
properties of the category itself – the
principle of inheritance
IV. Direct Comparisons of
Models – Central Themes
B. Property Statements
1. Problem with the
Feature Comparison
model, it is unable to
account for property
statements
2. Can handle “Robin
has wings” but…
3. The model assumed a
feature list that
corresponded to the
properties – i.e.
“THINGS WITH
WINGS”
4. Hierarchical models
handle the same as
any other statement
IV. Direct Comparisons of
Models – Central Themes
C. Typicality Effects
1. Typicality refers to the degree to which items
are viewed as typical, central members of a
category
2. Battig & Montague (1969) category
membership norms
3. Less frequent category members have lower
feature overlap than common members
• Robin is a bird – common
• Chicken is a bird – uncommon
IV. Direct Comparisons of
Models – Central Themes
C. Typicality Effects
3. Less frequent category members have
lower feature overlap than common
members
• Robin is a bird – common
• Chicken is a bird – uncommon
4. Typical members can be judged more
rapidly than atypical members
IV. Direct Comparisons of
Models – Central Themes
C. Typicality Effects
3. Less frequent
category members
have lower feature
overlap than common
members
• Robin is a bird –
common
• Chicken is a bird –
uncommon
4. Typical members can
be judged more
rapidly than atypical
members
IV. Direct Comparisons of
Models – Central Themes
C. Typicality Effects
4. Typical members can be judged more
rapidly than atypical members –
typicality effect
IV. Direct Comparisons of
Models – Central Themes
D. Semantic Relatedness
1. A direct prediction of feature
comparison relates to how similar
concepts are
2. Rips (1975) – demonstration
IV. Direct Comparisons of
Models – Central Themes
D. Semantic Relatedness
1. A direct prediction of feature
comparison relates to how similar
concepts are
2. Multi-dimensional Scaling Solutions
IV. Direct Comparisons of
Models – Central Themes
D. Semantic
Relatedness
1. A direct prediction of
feature comparison
relates to how similar
concepts are
2. Multi-dimensional
Scaling Solutions
IV. Direct Comparisons of
Models – Central Themes
D. Semantic Relatedness
1. A direct prediction of feature
comparison relates to how similar
concepts are
2. Multi-dimensional Scaling Solutions
3. Modern semantic network models
IV. Direct Comparisons of
Models – Central Themes
D. Semantic
Relatedness
4. Modern semantic
network models
• Redundant
information
• Distance
represents how
similar concepts
are
Learning and Motivation,
Concepts and
Categories
I. Types of Categories
A. Natural Categories
1. Occur naturally in
the world
2. Essentially define
themselves
3. Naturally occurring
concepts are labeled
after discovery
I. Types of Categories
A. Natural Categories
1. Occur naturally in
the world
2. Essentially define
themselves
3. Naturally occurring
concepts are labeled
after discovery
I. Types of Categories
B. Artifact Categories
1. Objects or
conventions
designed by humans
to serve particular
functions
2. Category
membership is
primarily determined
by function /
intended use
I. Types of Categories
B. Artifact Categories
1. Objects or conventions
designed by humans to
serve particular functions
2. Category membership is
primarily determined by
function / intended use
3. Should herding dogs be
an artifact category?
I. Types of Categories
C. Nominal Categories
1. Linguistic conventions that involve the
arbitrary assignment of a label to things that
fit a particular set of conditions
2. Often defined as a matter of convenience
I. Types of Categories
D. Ad Hoc Categories
1. Formed for a
purpose
2. Can be influenced by
context
I. Types of Categories
D. Ad Hoc Categories
1. Formed for a
purpose
2. Can be influenced by
context
I. Types of Categories
D. Ad Hoc Categories
1. Formed for a
purpose
2. Can be influenced by
context
feet
dust
bird
atom
hands
animal
cell
children
I. Types of Categories
D. Ad Hoc Categories
1. Formed for a
purpose
2. Can be influenced by
context
3. “Small things”
4. Other examples:
Things you take on
vacation
feet
dust
bird
atom
hands
animal
cell
children
I. Types of Categories
F. Levels of Categorization
1. Categories are both horizontally and
vertically organized
• Animals – plants
• Animals
– Birds
 Raptors
I. Types of Categories
F. Levels of Categorization
1. Categories are both horizontally and
vertically organized
2. Categories are also hierarchical with super
ordinate and subordinate categories
Animals
Birds Cats
Raptors Songbirds
Eagle
Hawk Canary Sparrow
Golden
Bald
Lions Tigers
II. Approaches to Concept
Representation
A. Classic approaches
B. Prototype theories
C. Exemplar theories
II. Approaches to Concept
Representation
A. Classic approaches
1. Similar to Feature theories
2. Classification is based on certain features or
characteristics
3. Features are both necessary and sufficient
for categorization
4. Problem – not everything can be categorized
this way: Games
• Typicality effects
• Fuzzy boundaries
II. Approaches to Concept
Representation
B. Prototype theories
1. As we learn, we “abstract out” a prototype
2. A prototype is the most typical, or
representative idea of a category
II. Approaches to Concept
Representation
C. Exemplar theories
1. Category membership is conducted by
comparison to stored examples (exemplars)
2. More typical members will be similar to
many exemplars
3. Categorization is entirely based on
comparison to stored examples
III. Applications of
Concepts and Categories
A. Stereotyping
1. We automatically categorize people based on
visual features (sex, age, race, weight)
2. Social-category level beliefs have the power to
shape impressions of individuals
3. Some are automatic, others are based on
either acquired information or assumptions
about category membership (e.g. either
someone discloses they are gay or assumed to
be gay).
III. Applications of
Concepts and Categories
B. Perceptions of minorities
1. Ethnic minorities
2. Sexual minorities
• Merritt et al (2013) gay actors perceived as
less masculine
3. Knowledge may influence our behavior
in these cases
III. Applications of
Concepts and Categories
C. Stereotype threat
1. Stereotype threat is the self threat
experienced by members of a negatively
stereotyped groups that they will be
judged or behave in ways that confirm
the stereotype
2. Often this precipitates the undesired
behavior
3. Our knowledge of our own group
membership can influence our behavior
III. Applications of
Concepts and Categories
D. How might categories affect
behavior?
1. Social categories may be formed via
prototypes or exemplars
2. Examples
• Gender
• Masculinity and femininity
• Sexual orientation
• Occupations
IV. Other ways our
knowledge influences
behavior
A. Schemas and scripts
1. Guide our actions
2. Can they lead us into trouble
• Sexual schemas
• Sexual scripts
B. Selective perception & Selective
memory

More Related Content

Similar to Semantic Memory_2014(1)-3.ppt

Psych 645 Effective Communication-snaptutorial.com
Psych 645 Effective Communication-snaptutorial.comPsych 645 Effective Communication-snaptutorial.com
Psych 645 Effective Communication-snaptutorial.com
jhonklinz37
 
Test Bank for Human Learning 7th Edition by Ormrod
Test Bank for Human Learning 7th Edition by OrmrodTest Bank for Human Learning 7th Edition by Ormrod
Test Bank for Human Learning 7th Edition by Ormrod
kelogawy
 
Cs106 professional-ethics
Cs106 professional-ethicsCs106 professional-ethics
Cs106 professional-ethics
clarkcollege2017
 
Lessons from the Astropy Code of Conduct
Lessons from the Astropy Code of ConductLessons from the Astropy Code of Conduct
Lessons from the Astropy Code of Conduct
Kelle Cruz
 
PSYCH 645 Enhance teaching - snaptutorial.com
PSYCH 645 Enhance teaching - snaptutorial.comPSYCH 645 Enhance teaching - snaptutorial.com
PSYCH 645 Enhance teaching - snaptutorial.com
donaldzs85
 
Overview on Individual Behavior
Overview on Individual BehaviorOverview on Individual Behavior
CHARACTERISTICS-ETHICS-AND-PROCESSES-IN-RESEARCH.pptx
CHARACTERISTICS-ETHICS-AND-PROCESSES-IN-RESEARCH.pptxCHARACTERISTICS-ETHICS-AND-PROCESSES-IN-RESEARCH.pptx
CHARACTERISTICS-ETHICS-AND-PROCESSES-IN-RESEARCH.pptx
CynthiaLuay
 
Organisational Behavior: Individual Behavior In An Organization
Organisational Behavior: Individual Behavior In An OrganizationOrganisational Behavior: Individual Behavior In An Organization
Organisational Behavior: Individual Behavior In An Organization
We Learn - A Continuous Learning Forum from Welingkar's Distance Learning Program.
 
L&M wk 2
L&M wk 2L&M wk 2
L&M wk 2
Cogpsychteacher
 
Tu812 tma02 presentation_part_2 version 2 (forum post)
Tu812 tma02 presentation_part_2 version 2 (forum post)Tu812 tma02 presentation_part_2 version 2 (forum post)
Tu812 tma02 presentation_part_2 version 2 (forum post)
Jitse D. J. van Ameijde
 
Psych 645 Exceptional Education-snaptutorial.com
Psych 645 Exceptional Education-snaptutorial.comPsych 645 Exceptional Education-snaptutorial.com
Psych 645 Exceptional Education-snaptutorial.com
robertleses35
 
A Unified Model of Learning Styles
A Unified Model of Learning StylesA Unified Model of Learning Styles
A Unified Model of Learning StylesDamian T. Gordon
 
LB wk 13
LB wk 13LB wk 13
LB wk 13
Cogpsychteacher
 
Note There are more questions than usual, so you will n.docx
Note There are more questions than usual, so you will n.docxNote There are more questions than usual, so you will n.docx
Note There are more questions than usual, so you will n.docx
henrymartin15260
 
EAPP Lesson 3.pptx
EAPP Lesson 3.pptxEAPP Lesson 3.pptx
EAPP Lesson 3.pptx
JCStormborn
 
Grade Level PAT Curriculum
Grade Level PAT CurriculumGrade Level PAT Curriculum
Grade Level PAT Curriculum
Linda Fullhart
 
Chapter 1 - Introduction to Chemistry
Chapter 1 - Introduction to ChemistryChapter 1 - Introduction to Chemistry
Chapter 1 - Introduction to Chemistry
Kendon Smith
 

Similar to Semantic Memory_2014(1)-3.ppt (20)

Psych 645 Effective Communication-snaptutorial.com
Psych 645 Effective Communication-snaptutorial.comPsych 645 Effective Communication-snaptutorial.com
Psych 645 Effective Communication-snaptutorial.com
 
Test Bank for Human Learning 7th Edition by Ormrod
Test Bank for Human Learning 7th Edition by OrmrodTest Bank for Human Learning 7th Edition by Ormrod
Test Bank for Human Learning 7th Edition by Ormrod
 
Zoo 2
Zoo 2Zoo 2
Zoo 2
 
Sys Bio110sy(09)
Sys Bio110sy(09)Sys Bio110sy(09)
Sys Bio110sy(09)
 
Cs106 professional-ethics
Cs106 professional-ethicsCs106 professional-ethics
Cs106 professional-ethics
 
Lessons from the Astropy Code of Conduct
Lessons from the Astropy Code of ConductLessons from the Astropy Code of Conduct
Lessons from the Astropy Code of Conduct
 
PSYCH 645 Enhance teaching - snaptutorial.com
PSYCH 645 Enhance teaching - snaptutorial.comPSYCH 645 Enhance teaching - snaptutorial.com
PSYCH 645 Enhance teaching - snaptutorial.com
 
Overview on Individual Behavior
Overview on Individual BehaviorOverview on Individual Behavior
Overview on Individual Behavior
 
CHARACTERISTICS-ETHICS-AND-PROCESSES-IN-RESEARCH.pptx
CHARACTERISTICS-ETHICS-AND-PROCESSES-IN-RESEARCH.pptxCHARACTERISTICS-ETHICS-AND-PROCESSES-IN-RESEARCH.pptx
CHARACTERISTICS-ETHICS-AND-PROCESSES-IN-RESEARCH.pptx
 
Organisational Behavior: Individual Behavior In An Organization
Organisational Behavior: Individual Behavior In An OrganizationOrganisational Behavior: Individual Behavior In An Organization
Organisational Behavior: Individual Behavior In An Organization
 
L&M wk 2
L&M wk 2L&M wk 2
L&M wk 2
 
Tu812 tma02 presentation_part_2 version 2 (forum post)
Tu812 tma02 presentation_part_2 version 2 (forum post)Tu812 tma02 presentation_part_2 version 2 (forum post)
Tu812 tma02 presentation_part_2 version 2 (forum post)
 
Psych 645 Exceptional Education-snaptutorial.com
Psych 645 Exceptional Education-snaptutorial.comPsych 645 Exceptional Education-snaptutorial.com
Psych 645 Exceptional Education-snaptutorial.com
 
A Unified Model of Learning Styles
A Unified Model of Learning StylesA Unified Model of Learning Styles
A Unified Model of Learning Styles
 
LB wk 13
LB wk 13LB wk 13
LB wk 13
 
Note There are more questions than usual, so you will n.docx
Note There are more questions than usual, so you will n.docxNote There are more questions than usual, so you will n.docx
Note There are more questions than usual, so you will n.docx
 
EAPP Lesson 3.pptx
EAPP Lesson 3.pptxEAPP Lesson 3.pptx
EAPP Lesson 3.pptx
 
Lp for 12th actual off
Lp for 12th actual offLp for 12th actual off
Lp for 12th actual off
 
Grade Level PAT Curriculum
Grade Level PAT CurriculumGrade Level PAT Curriculum
Grade Level PAT Curriculum
 
Chapter 1 - Introduction to Chemistry
Chapter 1 - Introduction to ChemistryChapter 1 - Introduction to Chemistry
Chapter 1 - Introduction to Chemistry
 

Recently uploaded

Orion Air Quality Monitoring Systems - CWS
Orion Air Quality Monitoring Systems - CWSOrion Air Quality Monitoring Systems - CWS
Orion Air Quality Monitoring Systems - CWS
Columbia Weather Systems
 
Phenomics assisted breeding in crop improvement
Phenomics assisted breeding in crop improvementPhenomics assisted breeding in crop improvement
Phenomics assisted breeding in crop improvement
IshaGoswami9
 
Chapter 12 - climate change and the energy crisis
Chapter 12 - climate change and the energy crisisChapter 12 - climate change and the energy crisis
Chapter 12 - climate change and the energy crisis
tonzsalvador2222
 
BREEDING METHODS FOR DISEASE RESISTANCE.pptx
BREEDING METHODS FOR DISEASE RESISTANCE.pptxBREEDING METHODS FOR DISEASE RESISTANCE.pptx
BREEDING METHODS FOR DISEASE RESISTANCE.pptx
RASHMI M G
 
DERIVATION OF MODIFIED BERNOULLI EQUATION WITH VISCOUS EFFECTS AND TERMINAL V...
DERIVATION OF MODIFIED BERNOULLI EQUATION WITH VISCOUS EFFECTS AND TERMINAL V...DERIVATION OF MODIFIED BERNOULLI EQUATION WITH VISCOUS EFFECTS AND TERMINAL V...
DERIVATION OF MODIFIED BERNOULLI EQUATION WITH VISCOUS EFFECTS AND TERMINAL V...
Wasswaderrick3
 
Nucleic Acid-its structural and functional complexity.
Nucleic Acid-its structural and functional complexity.Nucleic Acid-its structural and functional complexity.
Nucleic Acid-its structural and functional complexity.
Nistarini College, Purulia (W.B) India
 
Eukaryotic Transcription Presentation.pptx
Eukaryotic Transcription Presentation.pptxEukaryotic Transcription Presentation.pptx
Eukaryotic Transcription Presentation.pptx
RitabrataSarkar3
 
Leaf Initiation, Growth and Differentiation.pdf
Leaf Initiation, Growth and Differentiation.pdfLeaf Initiation, Growth and Differentiation.pdf
Leaf Initiation, Growth and Differentiation.pdf
Renu Jangid
 
Topic: SICKLE CELL DISEASE IN CHILDREN-3.pdf
Topic: SICKLE CELL DISEASE IN CHILDREN-3.pdfTopic: SICKLE CELL DISEASE IN CHILDREN-3.pdf
Topic: SICKLE CELL DISEASE IN CHILDREN-3.pdf
TinyAnderson
 
Unveiling the Energy Potential of Marshmallow Deposits.pdf
Unveiling the Energy Potential of Marshmallow Deposits.pdfUnveiling the Energy Potential of Marshmallow Deposits.pdf
Unveiling the Energy Potential of Marshmallow Deposits.pdf
Erdal Coalmaker
 
3D Hybrid PIC simulation of the plasma expansion (ISSS-14)
3D Hybrid PIC simulation of the plasma expansion (ISSS-14)3D Hybrid PIC simulation of the plasma expansion (ISSS-14)
3D Hybrid PIC simulation of the plasma expansion (ISSS-14)
David Osipyan
 
20240520 Planning a Circuit Simulator in JavaScript.pptx
20240520 Planning a Circuit Simulator in JavaScript.pptx20240520 Planning a Circuit Simulator in JavaScript.pptx
20240520 Planning a Circuit Simulator in JavaScript.pptx
Sharon Liu
 
Observation of Io’s Resurfacing via Plume Deposition Using Ground-based Adapt...
Observation of Io’s Resurfacing via Plume Deposition Using Ground-based Adapt...Observation of Io’s Resurfacing via Plume Deposition Using Ground-based Adapt...
Observation of Io’s Resurfacing via Plume Deposition Using Ground-based Adapt...
Sérgio Sacani
 
Remote Sensing and Computational, Evolutionary, Supercomputing, and Intellige...
Remote Sensing and Computational, Evolutionary, Supercomputing, and Intellige...Remote Sensing and Computational, Evolutionary, Supercomputing, and Intellige...
Remote Sensing and Computational, Evolutionary, Supercomputing, and Intellige...
University of Maribor
 
Travis Hills' Endeavors in Minnesota: Fostering Environmental and Economic Pr...
Travis Hills' Endeavors in Minnesota: Fostering Environmental and Economic Pr...Travis Hills' Endeavors in Minnesota: Fostering Environmental and Economic Pr...
Travis Hills' Endeavors in Minnesota: Fostering Environmental and Economic Pr...
Travis Hills MN
 
mô tả các thí nghiệm về đánh giá tác động dòng khí hóa sau đốt
mô tả các thí nghiệm về đánh giá tác động dòng khí hóa sau đốtmô tả các thí nghiệm về đánh giá tác động dòng khí hóa sau đốt
mô tả các thí nghiệm về đánh giá tác động dòng khí hóa sau đốt
HongcNguyn6
 
Deep Behavioral Phenotyping in Systems Neuroscience for Functional Atlasing a...
Deep Behavioral Phenotyping in Systems Neuroscience for Functional Atlasing a...Deep Behavioral Phenotyping in Systems Neuroscience for Functional Atlasing a...
Deep Behavioral Phenotyping in Systems Neuroscience for Functional Atlasing a...
Ana Luísa Pinho
 
DMARDs Pharmacolgy Pharm D 5th Semester.pdf
DMARDs Pharmacolgy Pharm D 5th Semester.pdfDMARDs Pharmacolgy Pharm D 5th Semester.pdf
DMARDs Pharmacolgy Pharm D 5th Semester.pdf
fafyfskhan251kmf
 
原版制作(carleton毕业证书)卡尔顿大学毕业证硕士文凭原版一模一样
原版制作(carleton毕业证书)卡尔顿大学毕业证硕士文凭原版一模一样原版制作(carleton毕业证书)卡尔顿大学毕业证硕士文凭原版一模一样
原版制作(carleton毕业证书)卡尔顿大学毕业证硕士文凭原版一模一样
yqqaatn0
 
SAR of Medicinal Chemistry 1st by dk.pdf
SAR of Medicinal Chemistry 1st by dk.pdfSAR of Medicinal Chemistry 1st by dk.pdf
SAR of Medicinal Chemistry 1st by dk.pdf
KrushnaDarade1
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Orion Air Quality Monitoring Systems - CWS
Orion Air Quality Monitoring Systems - CWSOrion Air Quality Monitoring Systems - CWS
Orion Air Quality Monitoring Systems - CWS
 
Phenomics assisted breeding in crop improvement
Phenomics assisted breeding in crop improvementPhenomics assisted breeding in crop improvement
Phenomics assisted breeding in crop improvement
 
Chapter 12 - climate change and the energy crisis
Chapter 12 - climate change and the energy crisisChapter 12 - climate change and the energy crisis
Chapter 12 - climate change and the energy crisis
 
BREEDING METHODS FOR DISEASE RESISTANCE.pptx
BREEDING METHODS FOR DISEASE RESISTANCE.pptxBREEDING METHODS FOR DISEASE RESISTANCE.pptx
BREEDING METHODS FOR DISEASE RESISTANCE.pptx
 
DERIVATION OF MODIFIED BERNOULLI EQUATION WITH VISCOUS EFFECTS AND TERMINAL V...
DERIVATION OF MODIFIED BERNOULLI EQUATION WITH VISCOUS EFFECTS AND TERMINAL V...DERIVATION OF MODIFIED BERNOULLI EQUATION WITH VISCOUS EFFECTS AND TERMINAL V...
DERIVATION OF MODIFIED BERNOULLI EQUATION WITH VISCOUS EFFECTS AND TERMINAL V...
 
Nucleic Acid-its structural and functional complexity.
Nucleic Acid-its structural and functional complexity.Nucleic Acid-its structural and functional complexity.
Nucleic Acid-its structural and functional complexity.
 
Eukaryotic Transcription Presentation.pptx
Eukaryotic Transcription Presentation.pptxEukaryotic Transcription Presentation.pptx
Eukaryotic Transcription Presentation.pptx
 
Leaf Initiation, Growth and Differentiation.pdf
Leaf Initiation, Growth and Differentiation.pdfLeaf Initiation, Growth and Differentiation.pdf
Leaf Initiation, Growth and Differentiation.pdf
 
Topic: SICKLE CELL DISEASE IN CHILDREN-3.pdf
Topic: SICKLE CELL DISEASE IN CHILDREN-3.pdfTopic: SICKLE CELL DISEASE IN CHILDREN-3.pdf
Topic: SICKLE CELL DISEASE IN CHILDREN-3.pdf
 
Unveiling the Energy Potential of Marshmallow Deposits.pdf
Unveiling the Energy Potential of Marshmallow Deposits.pdfUnveiling the Energy Potential of Marshmallow Deposits.pdf
Unveiling the Energy Potential of Marshmallow Deposits.pdf
 
3D Hybrid PIC simulation of the plasma expansion (ISSS-14)
3D Hybrid PIC simulation of the plasma expansion (ISSS-14)3D Hybrid PIC simulation of the plasma expansion (ISSS-14)
3D Hybrid PIC simulation of the plasma expansion (ISSS-14)
 
20240520 Planning a Circuit Simulator in JavaScript.pptx
20240520 Planning a Circuit Simulator in JavaScript.pptx20240520 Planning a Circuit Simulator in JavaScript.pptx
20240520 Planning a Circuit Simulator in JavaScript.pptx
 
Observation of Io’s Resurfacing via Plume Deposition Using Ground-based Adapt...
Observation of Io’s Resurfacing via Plume Deposition Using Ground-based Adapt...Observation of Io’s Resurfacing via Plume Deposition Using Ground-based Adapt...
Observation of Io’s Resurfacing via Plume Deposition Using Ground-based Adapt...
 
Remote Sensing and Computational, Evolutionary, Supercomputing, and Intellige...
Remote Sensing and Computational, Evolutionary, Supercomputing, and Intellige...Remote Sensing and Computational, Evolutionary, Supercomputing, and Intellige...
Remote Sensing and Computational, Evolutionary, Supercomputing, and Intellige...
 
Travis Hills' Endeavors in Minnesota: Fostering Environmental and Economic Pr...
Travis Hills' Endeavors in Minnesota: Fostering Environmental and Economic Pr...Travis Hills' Endeavors in Minnesota: Fostering Environmental and Economic Pr...
Travis Hills' Endeavors in Minnesota: Fostering Environmental and Economic Pr...
 
mô tả các thí nghiệm về đánh giá tác động dòng khí hóa sau đốt
mô tả các thí nghiệm về đánh giá tác động dòng khí hóa sau đốtmô tả các thí nghiệm về đánh giá tác động dòng khí hóa sau đốt
mô tả các thí nghiệm về đánh giá tác động dòng khí hóa sau đốt
 
Deep Behavioral Phenotyping in Systems Neuroscience for Functional Atlasing a...
Deep Behavioral Phenotyping in Systems Neuroscience for Functional Atlasing a...Deep Behavioral Phenotyping in Systems Neuroscience for Functional Atlasing a...
Deep Behavioral Phenotyping in Systems Neuroscience for Functional Atlasing a...
 
DMARDs Pharmacolgy Pharm D 5th Semester.pdf
DMARDs Pharmacolgy Pharm D 5th Semester.pdfDMARDs Pharmacolgy Pharm D 5th Semester.pdf
DMARDs Pharmacolgy Pharm D 5th Semester.pdf
 
原版制作(carleton毕业证书)卡尔顿大学毕业证硕士文凭原版一模一样
原版制作(carleton毕业证书)卡尔顿大学毕业证硕士文凭原版一模一样原版制作(carleton毕业证书)卡尔顿大学毕业证硕士文凭原版一模一样
原版制作(carleton毕业证书)卡尔顿大学毕业证硕士文凭原版一模一样
 
SAR of Medicinal Chemistry 1st by dk.pdf
SAR of Medicinal Chemistry 1st by dk.pdfSAR of Medicinal Chemistry 1st by dk.pdf
SAR of Medicinal Chemistry 1st by dk.pdf
 

Semantic Memory_2014(1)-3.ppt

  • 2. I. Introduction to Semantic Memory A. What is semantic memory? 1. Permanent memory store of our world knowledge 2. Different from episodic memory – no representation of when or where we learned the information 3. Examples • What is the capitol of Colorado? • How many legs does a horse have? • What color is a canary?
  • 3. I. Introduction to Semantic Memory B. Key questions: 1. How is information stored? 2. What is the nature of the representation? 3. How is information learned? 4. How is information retrieved?
  • 4. I. Introduction to Semantic Memory C. New terminology 1. Concepts • Mental representations • Often “the fundamental unit of thought” • “An idea that includes all that is characteristically associated with it” (Medin, 1989) 2. Proposition • The relationship between concepts • E.G. – A canary is yellow – A canary is a bird – A bird has wings – A bird is an animal
  • 5. II. The Collins & Quillian Hierarchical Model A. Key Properties 1. Network: An interrelated set of concepts / body of knowledge. 2. Node: A point or location in the network representing a single concept. 3. Pathways: associations between concepts (propositions) that are directional.
  • 6. II. The Collins & Quillian Model A. Key Properties 3. Pathways: associations between concepts (propositions) that are directional. • “ISA” pathways denote category membership – “Canary is a bird” • Property pathways describe properties of concepts “Bird has feathers”
  • 7. Sample Portion of the Semantic Network
  • 8. II. The Collins & Quillian Model B. Spreading Activation 1. The mental activity of accessing and retrieving information from the network. 2. Takes passive concepts (those not currently in working memory) and activates them (puts them in working memory). 3. Activation then spreads to related nodes (e.g., activation to the doctor node would also spread to the nurse node).
  • 9. II. The Collins & Quillian Model C. Key Features of the Model 1. Hierarchical – concepts are arranged in a hierarchy 2. This allows for cognitive economy – removes any redundancy 3. Takes time for activation to spread across inactive nodes 4. Activation spreads quickly across recently activated nodes
  • 10. Sample Portion of the Semantic Network
  • 11. III. Smith’s Feature Comparison Model A. General Structure 1. Information about concepts are represented as feature lists 2. These lists include both defining features and characteristic features • Defining features are essential to the meaning of a concept • Characteristic features are common, but not essential to the meaning of a concept
  • 12. III. Smith’s Feature Comparison Model 2. These lists include both defining features and characteristic features • Defining features are essential to the meaning of a concept • Characteristic features are common, but not essential to the meaning of a concept Robin Physical object Living Animate Feathered Red breasted
  • 13. III. Smith’s Feature Comparison Model 2. These lists include both defining features and characteristic features • Defining features are essential to the meaning of a concept • Characteristic features are common, but not essential to the meaning of a concept Robin Eats worms Roosts in trees
  • 14. III. Smith’s Feature Comparison Model 2. These lists include both defining features and characteristic features • Defining features are essential to the meaning of a concept • Characteristic features are common, but not essential to the meaning of a concept Leos Born between July 23 and August 22
  • 15. III. Smith’s Feature Comparison Model 2. These lists include both defining features and characteristic features • Defining features are essential to the meaning of a concept • Characteristic features are common, but not essential to the meaning of a concept Leos Loyal Self-assured Charming Generous Opinionated Overbearing Proud
  • 16. III. Smith’s Feature Comparison Model A. General Structure 1. Information about concepts are represented as feature lists 2. These lists include both defining features and characteristic features 3. Features are stored starting with most defining followed by most characteristic
  • 18. III. Smith’s Feature Comparison Model B. Feature Comparison 1. Models are often tested using sentence verification tasks – e.g. a ROBIN is a BIRD 2. The model begins with Stage 1 – global feature comparison • ‘Fast yes’ responses occur when there is a large number of shared features • ‘Fast no’ responses occur when there are few shared features
  • 19. A ROBIN is a BIRD…
  • 20. III. Smith’s Feature Comparison Model B. Feature Comparison 2. The model begins with Stage 1 – global feature comparison • ‘Fast yes’ responses occur when there is a large number of shared features • ‘Fast no’ responses occur when there are few shared features • Intermediate comparisons (some shared, some not shared) move to a Stage 2 Comparison of Defining Features
  • 22. III. Smith’s Feature Comparison Model B. Feature Comparison 2. The model begins with Stage 1 – global feature comparison • Intermediate comparisons (some shared, some not shared) move to a Stage 2 Comparison of Defining Features • When the defining features match, a ‘slow yes’ response is given • When there is a feature mismatch, a ‘slow no’ response is given
  • 24. IV. Direct Comparisons of Models – Central Themes A. The Principle of Cognitive Economy 1. A primary assumption of the Hierarchical Model is cognitive economy – only non-redundant facts are stored 2. The members of a category inherit the properties of the category itself – the principle of inheritance
  • 25. IV. Direct Comparisons of Models – Central Themes B. Property Statements 1. Problem with the Feature Comparison model, it is unable to account for property statements 2. Can handle “Robin has wings” but… 3. The model assumed a feature list that corresponded to the properties – i.e. “THINGS WITH WINGS” 4. Hierarchical models handle the same as any other statement
  • 26. IV. Direct Comparisons of Models – Central Themes C. Typicality Effects 1. Typicality refers to the degree to which items are viewed as typical, central members of a category 2. Battig & Montague (1969) category membership norms 3. Less frequent category members have lower feature overlap than common members • Robin is a bird – common • Chicken is a bird – uncommon
  • 27. IV. Direct Comparisons of Models – Central Themes C. Typicality Effects 3. Less frequent category members have lower feature overlap than common members • Robin is a bird – common • Chicken is a bird – uncommon 4. Typical members can be judged more rapidly than atypical members
  • 28. IV. Direct Comparisons of Models – Central Themes C. Typicality Effects 3. Less frequent category members have lower feature overlap than common members • Robin is a bird – common • Chicken is a bird – uncommon 4. Typical members can be judged more rapidly than atypical members
  • 29. IV. Direct Comparisons of Models – Central Themes C. Typicality Effects 4. Typical members can be judged more rapidly than atypical members – typicality effect
  • 30. IV. Direct Comparisons of Models – Central Themes D. Semantic Relatedness 1. A direct prediction of feature comparison relates to how similar concepts are 2. Rips (1975) – demonstration
  • 31. IV. Direct Comparisons of Models – Central Themes D. Semantic Relatedness 1. A direct prediction of feature comparison relates to how similar concepts are 2. Multi-dimensional Scaling Solutions
  • 32. IV. Direct Comparisons of Models – Central Themes D. Semantic Relatedness 1. A direct prediction of feature comparison relates to how similar concepts are 2. Multi-dimensional Scaling Solutions
  • 33. IV. Direct Comparisons of Models – Central Themes D. Semantic Relatedness 1. A direct prediction of feature comparison relates to how similar concepts are 2. Multi-dimensional Scaling Solutions 3. Modern semantic network models
  • 34. IV. Direct Comparisons of Models – Central Themes D. Semantic Relatedness 4. Modern semantic network models • Redundant information • Distance represents how similar concepts are Learning and Motivation,
  • 36. I. Types of Categories A. Natural Categories 1. Occur naturally in the world 2. Essentially define themselves 3. Naturally occurring concepts are labeled after discovery
  • 37. I. Types of Categories A. Natural Categories 1. Occur naturally in the world 2. Essentially define themselves 3. Naturally occurring concepts are labeled after discovery
  • 38. I. Types of Categories B. Artifact Categories 1. Objects or conventions designed by humans to serve particular functions 2. Category membership is primarily determined by function / intended use
  • 39. I. Types of Categories B. Artifact Categories 1. Objects or conventions designed by humans to serve particular functions 2. Category membership is primarily determined by function / intended use 3. Should herding dogs be an artifact category?
  • 40. I. Types of Categories C. Nominal Categories 1. Linguistic conventions that involve the arbitrary assignment of a label to things that fit a particular set of conditions 2. Often defined as a matter of convenience
  • 41. I. Types of Categories D. Ad Hoc Categories 1. Formed for a purpose 2. Can be influenced by context
  • 42. I. Types of Categories D. Ad Hoc Categories 1. Formed for a purpose 2. Can be influenced by context
  • 43. I. Types of Categories D. Ad Hoc Categories 1. Formed for a purpose 2. Can be influenced by context feet dust bird atom hands animal cell children
  • 44. I. Types of Categories D. Ad Hoc Categories 1. Formed for a purpose 2. Can be influenced by context 3. “Small things” 4. Other examples: Things you take on vacation feet dust bird atom hands animal cell children
  • 45. I. Types of Categories F. Levels of Categorization 1. Categories are both horizontally and vertically organized • Animals – plants • Animals – Birds  Raptors
  • 46. I. Types of Categories F. Levels of Categorization 1. Categories are both horizontally and vertically organized 2. Categories are also hierarchical with super ordinate and subordinate categories
  • 47. Animals Birds Cats Raptors Songbirds Eagle Hawk Canary Sparrow Golden Bald Lions Tigers
  • 48. II. Approaches to Concept Representation A. Classic approaches B. Prototype theories C. Exemplar theories
  • 49. II. Approaches to Concept Representation A. Classic approaches 1. Similar to Feature theories 2. Classification is based on certain features or characteristics 3. Features are both necessary and sufficient for categorization 4. Problem – not everything can be categorized this way: Games • Typicality effects • Fuzzy boundaries
  • 50. II. Approaches to Concept Representation B. Prototype theories 1. As we learn, we “abstract out” a prototype 2. A prototype is the most typical, or representative idea of a category
  • 51. II. Approaches to Concept Representation C. Exemplar theories 1. Category membership is conducted by comparison to stored examples (exemplars) 2. More typical members will be similar to many exemplars 3. Categorization is entirely based on comparison to stored examples
  • 52. III. Applications of Concepts and Categories A. Stereotyping 1. We automatically categorize people based on visual features (sex, age, race, weight) 2. Social-category level beliefs have the power to shape impressions of individuals 3. Some are automatic, others are based on either acquired information or assumptions about category membership (e.g. either someone discloses they are gay or assumed to be gay).
  • 53. III. Applications of Concepts and Categories B. Perceptions of minorities 1. Ethnic minorities 2. Sexual minorities • Merritt et al (2013) gay actors perceived as less masculine 3. Knowledge may influence our behavior in these cases
  • 54. III. Applications of Concepts and Categories C. Stereotype threat 1. Stereotype threat is the self threat experienced by members of a negatively stereotyped groups that they will be judged or behave in ways that confirm the stereotype 2. Often this precipitates the undesired behavior 3. Our knowledge of our own group membership can influence our behavior
  • 55. III. Applications of Concepts and Categories D. How might categories affect behavior? 1. Social categories may be formed via prototypes or exemplars 2. Examples • Gender • Masculinity and femininity • Sexual orientation • Occupations
  • 56. IV. Other ways our knowledge influences behavior A. Schemas and scripts 1. Guide our actions 2. Can they lead us into trouble • Sexual schemas • Sexual scripts B. Selective perception & Selective memory