This document is a preliminary forest conservation plan for the Scotland Heights property in Charles County, Maryland. It identifies 6 forest stands on the property and provides details on the forest composition, health, and environmental features of each stand. It also outlines plans for final forest conservation, construction timetables, reforestation efforts, and planting specifications to protect forests on the site during and after development. The plan was prepared by ATCS, PLC to comply with Charles County forest conservation regulations for the proposed residential development of the property.
The Bureau of Land Management (under G.W. Bush) adopted the Western Oregon Plan Revision which will significantly increase old growth clearcutting on public forests in western Oregon. Here is an explanation why it's a very bad idea.
Colorado water conservation board and great outdoors colorado funding sources...rshimoda2014
These are two presentations from a panel moderated by Amy Beattie, Colorado Water Trust. Panelists included Josh Tenneson, Great Outdoors Colorado; Chris Sturm, Colorado Water Conservation Board; Caroline Bradford, Understanding Water Resources; Toby Sprunk, Eagle County Open Space; and Laura Makar, Pitkin County, Colorado
The Bureau of Land Management (under G.W. Bush) adopted the Western Oregon Plan Revision which will significantly increase old growth clearcutting on public forests in western Oregon. Here is an explanation why it's a very bad idea.
Colorado water conservation board and great outdoors colorado funding sources...rshimoda2014
These are two presentations from a panel moderated by Amy Beattie, Colorado Water Trust. Panelists included Josh Tenneson, Great Outdoors Colorado; Chris Sturm, Colorado Water Conservation Board; Caroline Bradford, Understanding Water Resources; Toby Sprunk, Eagle County Open Space; and Laura Makar, Pitkin County, Colorado
Cultural Histories & Culturally Modified Trees of the Youngs Rock Rigdon ProjectStephen Todd Jankowski
Northwest Anthropological Conference 2022 Presentation on cultural histories & CMTs of the Youngs Rock Rigdon Project area. Includes project design, oak savannah patch restoration, historic range of variability land types, historic and pre-contact era CMT types, Fire scarred v. CMTs differences, CMTs results of the YRR project, & CMT protection / mitigation strategies.
Dean Paron (of Minnesota Department of Natural Resources), presented at the Adapting Forested Watersheds to Climate Change Workshop, at The Waters, Minocqua, WI on March 15-16, 2017. The workshop was hosted by the Northern Institute of Applied Climate Science (NIACS), USDA Climate Hubs, and the Wisconsin Initiative on Climate Change Impacts (WICCI).
INDOT Construction Review Drawings for State Road 250 landslide correction and roadway improvements Switzerland County, Indiana. Typical example of transportation deliverables to INDOT.
Cultural Histories & Culturally Modified Trees of the Youngs Rock Rigdon ProjectStephen Todd Jankowski
Northwest Anthropological Conference 2022 Presentation on cultural histories & CMTs of the Youngs Rock Rigdon Project area. Includes project design, oak savannah patch restoration, historic range of variability land types, historic and pre-contact era CMT types, Fire scarred v. CMTs differences, CMTs results of the YRR project, & CMT protection / mitigation strategies.
Dean Paron (of Minnesota Department of Natural Resources), presented at the Adapting Forested Watersheds to Climate Change Workshop, at The Waters, Minocqua, WI on March 15-16, 2017. The workshop was hosted by the Northern Institute of Applied Climate Science (NIACS), USDA Climate Hubs, and the Wisconsin Initiative on Climate Change Impacts (WICCI).
Similar to Scotland Heights Forest Conservation Report (20)
INDOT Construction Review Drawings for State Road 250 landslide correction and roadway improvements Switzerland County, Indiana. Typical example of transportation deliverables to INDOT.
Public Presentation at Ball State University College of Architecture and Planning discussing the role of landscape architects and planners designing farmers markets in urban settings.
Willie Nelson Net Worth: A Journey Through Music, Movies, and Business Venturesgreendigital
Willie Nelson is a name that resonates within the world of music and entertainment. Known for his unique voice, and masterful guitar skills. and an extraordinary career spanning several decades. Nelson has become a legend in the country music scene. But, his influence extends far beyond the realm of music. with ventures in acting, writing, activism, and business. This comprehensive article delves into Willie Nelson net worth. exploring the various facets of his career that have contributed to his large fortune.
Follow us on: Pinterest
Introduction
Willie Nelson net worth is a testament to his enduring influence and success in many fields. Born on April 29, 1933, in Abbott, Texas. Nelson's journey from a humble beginning to becoming one of the most iconic figures in American music is nothing short of inspirational. His net worth, which estimated to be around $25 million as of 2024. reflects a career that is as diverse as it is prolific.
Early Life and Musical Beginnings
Humble Origins
Willie Hugh Nelson was born during the Great Depression. a time of significant economic hardship in the United States. Raised by his grandparents. Nelson found solace and inspiration in music from an early age. His grandmother taught him to play the guitar. setting the stage for what would become an illustrious career.
First Steps in Music
Nelson's initial foray into the music industry was fraught with challenges. He moved to Nashville, Tennessee, to pursue his dreams, but success did not come . Working as a songwriter, Nelson penned hits for other artists. which helped him gain a foothold in the competitive music scene. His songwriting skills contributed to his early earnings. laying the foundation for his net worth.
Rise to Stardom
Breakthrough Albums
The 1970s marked a turning point in Willie Nelson's career. His albums "Shotgun Willie" (1973), "Red Headed Stranger" (1975). and "Stardust" (1978) received critical acclaim and commercial success. These albums not only solidified his position in the country music genre. but also introduced his music to a broader audience. The success of these albums played a crucial role in boosting Willie Nelson net worth.
Iconic Songs
Willie Nelson net worth is also attributed to his extensive catalog of hit songs. Tracks like "Blue Eyes Crying in the Rain," "On the Road Again," and "Always on My Mind" have become timeless classics. These songs have not only earned Nelson large royalties but have also ensured his continued relevance in the music industry.
Acting and Film Career
Hollywood Ventures
In addition to his music career, Willie Nelson has also made a mark in Hollywood. His distinctive personality and on-screen presence have landed him roles in several films and television shows. Notable appearances include roles in "The Electric Horseman" (1979), "Honeysuckle Rose" (1980), and "Barbarosa" (1982). These acting gigs have added a significant amount to Willie Nelson net worth.
Television Appearances
Nelson's char
Micro RNA genes and their likely influence in rice (Oryza sativa L.) dynamic ...Open Access Research Paper
Micro RNAs (miRNAs) are small non-coding RNAs molecules having approximately 18-25 nucleotides, they are present in both plants and animals genomes. MiRNAs have diverse spatial expression patterns and regulate various developmental metabolisms, stress responses and other physiological processes. The dynamic gene expression playing major roles in phenotypic differences in organisms are believed to be controlled by miRNAs. Mutations in regions of regulatory factors, such as miRNA genes or transcription factors (TF) necessitated by dynamic environmental factors or pathogen infections, have tremendous effects on structure and expression of genes. The resultant novel gene products presents potential explanations for constant evolving desirable traits that have long been bred using conventional means, biotechnology or genetic engineering. Rice grain quality, yield, disease tolerance, climate-resilience and palatability properties are not exceptional to miRN Asmutations effects. There are new insights courtesy of high-throughput sequencing and improved proteomic techniques that organisms’ complexity and adaptations are highly contributed by miRNAs containing regulatory networks. This article aims to expound on how rice miRNAs could be driving evolution of traits and highlight the latest miRNA research progress. Moreover, the review accentuates miRNAs grey areas to be addressed and gives recommendations for further studies.
"Understanding the Carbon Cycle: Processes, Human Impacts, and Strategies for...MMariSelvam4
The carbon cycle is a critical component of Earth's environmental system, governing the movement and transformation of carbon through various reservoirs, including the atmosphere, oceans, soil, and living organisms. This complex cycle involves several key processes such as photosynthesis, respiration, decomposition, and carbon sequestration, each contributing to the regulation of carbon levels on the planet.
Human activities, particularly fossil fuel combustion and deforestation, have significantly altered the natural carbon cycle, leading to increased atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations and driving climate change. Understanding the intricacies of the carbon cycle is essential for assessing the impacts of these changes and developing effective mitigation strategies.
By studying the carbon cycle, scientists can identify carbon sources and sinks, measure carbon fluxes, and predict future trends. This knowledge is crucial for crafting policies aimed at reducing carbon emissions, enhancing carbon storage, and promoting sustainable practices. The carbon cycle's interplay with climate systems, ecosystems, and human activities underscores its importance in maintaining a stable and healthy planet.
In-depth exploration of the carbon cycle reveals the delicate balance required to sustain life and the urgent need to address anthropogenic influences. Through research, education, and policy, we can work towards restoring equilibrium in the carbon cycle and ensuring a sustainable future for generations to come.
Diabetes is a rapidly and serious health problem in Pakistan. This chronic condition is associated with serious long-term complications, including higher risk of heart disease and stroke. Aggressive treatment of hypertension and hyperlipideamia can result in a substantial reduction in cardiovascular events in patients with diabetes 1. Consequently pharmacist-led diabetes cardiovascular risk (DCVR) clinics have been established in both primary and secondary care sites in NHS Lothian during the past five years. An audit of the pharmaceutical care delivery at the clinics was conducted in order to evaluate practice and to standardize the pharmacists’ documentation of outcomes. Pharmaceutical care issues (PCI) and patient details were collected both prospectively and retrospectively from three DCVR clinics. The PCI`s were categorized according to a triangularised system consisting of multiple categories. These were ‘checks’, ‘changes’ (‘change in drug therapy process’ and ‘change in drug therapy’), ‘drug therapy problems’ and ‘quality assurance descriptors’ (‘timer perspective’ and ‘degree of change’). A verified medication assessment tool (MAT) for patients with chronic cardiovascular disease was applied to the patients from one of the clinics. The tool was used to quantify PCI`s and pharmacist actions that were centered on implementing or enforcing clinical guideline standards. A database was developed to be used as an assessment tool and to standardize the documentation of achievement of outcomes. Feedback on the audit of the pharmaceutical care delivery and the database was received from the DCVR clinic pharmacist at a focus group meeting.
Natural farming @ Dr. Siddhartha S. Jena.pptxsidjena70
A brief about organic farming/ Natural farming/ Zero budget natural farming/ Subash Palekar Natural farming which keeps us and environment safe and healthy. Next gen Agricultural practices of chemical free farming.
Artificial Reefs by Kuddle Life Foundation - May 2024punit537210
Situated in Pondicherry, India, Kuddle Life Foundation is a charitable, non-profit and non-governmental organization (NGO) dedicated to improving the living standards of coastal communities and simultaneously placing a strong emphasis on the protection of marine ecosystems.
One of the key areas we work in is Artificial Reefs. This presentation captures our journey so far and our learnings. We hope you get as excited about marine conservation and artificial reefs as we are.
Please visit our website: https://kuddlelife.org
Our Instagram channel:
@kuddlelifefoundation
Our Linkedin Page:
https://www.linkedin.com/company/kuddlelifefoundation/
and write to us if you have any questions:
info@kuddlelife.org
Characterization and the Kinetics of drying at the drying oven and with micro...Open Access Research Paper
The objective of this work is to contribute to valorization de Nephelium lappaceum by the characterization of kinetics of drying of seeds of Nephelium lappaceum. The seeds were dehydrated until a constant mass respectively in a drying oven and a microwawe oven. The temperatures and the powers of drying are respectively: 50, 60 and 70°C and 140, 280 and 420 W. The results show that the curves of drying of seeds of Nephelium lappaceum do not present a phase of constant kinetics. The coefficients of diffusion vary between 2.09.10-8 to 2.98. 10-8m-2/s in the interval of 50°C at 70°C and between 4.83×10-07 at 9.04×10-07 m-8/s for the powers going of 140 W with 420 W the relation between Arrhenius and a value of energy of activation of 16.49 kJ. mol-1 expressed the effect of the temperature on effective diffusivity.
growbilliontrees.com-Trees for Granddaughter (1).pdf
Scotland Heights Forest Conservation Report
1. Scotland Heights
THE
PRELIMINARY FOREST CONSERVATION PLAN
FOR
Scotland Heights
6TH ELECTION DISTRICT
CHARLES COUNTY, MARYLAND
TAX MAP 7 GRID 3 PARCEL 221
Liber 1390 Folio 452
Residential
Zoned - RM
Owner/Applicant
Scotland Heights Limited
Partnership
C/O Mr. Richard Seikaly, President
3143 N Street NW
Washington, DC 20007
Telephone: 202/337-2212
Fax: 202/337-4187
Prepared By:
ATCS, P.L.C.
Environmental Planning
Land Development Engineering
Land Planning, Land Surveying
Seven Post Office RD
Suite G
Waldorf, Maryland 20602
301/8870-4530 Fax 301/843-1262
atcswaldorf@atcsplc.com
Report Certification
_____________________________________________________________________________________
I hereby certify that the report shown hereon conforms with the approved Charles
County Forest Conservation Ordinance, as amended on May 5, 1997, ordinance as listed
under #96-91
____________________________________________________________
James W. Whitehead Date
Professional Land Surveyor, #10880
Qualified DNR Professional 5/20/97
ATCS, P.L.C. Environmental Planners
9/1/2015
2. 09/01/15 Project
Name
Preliminary and Final Forest Conservation
Table Of Contents
Page
1.THE SITE ..................................................................................................................................................4
2.FOREST STAND DELINEATION METHODOLOGY .......................................................................4
I.FOREST STAND ASSOCIATION..............................................................................................................4
II.FOREST STAND CONDITIONS...............................................................................................................6
3.PRELIMINARY FOREST CONSERVATION PLAN.........................................................................12
4.FOREST CONSERVATION WORKSHEET........................................................................................12
5.THE FINAL FOREST CONSERVATION PLAN................................................................................12
A.PROJECT PHASING............................................................................................................................12
II.LONG TERM PROTECTION.................................................................................................................13
III.STATE AND FEDERAL PERMITS.........................................................................................................13
6. CONSTRUCTION TIME TABLE /FOREST PROTECTION PLAN...............................................13
A.SHORT TERM (CONSTRUCTION)........................................................................................................13
II.LONG TERM..................................................................................................................................15
7.REFORESTATION..................................................................................................................................15
A.SPECIES SELECTION..........................................................................................................................15
II.PLANT STOCKING.............................................................................................................................15
III.SITE PREPARATION..........................................................................................................................16
IV.PLANTING TIMES.............................................................................................................................16
8.PLANTING SPECIFICATIONS.............................................................................................................17
A.ON-SITE INSPECTION........................................................................................................................17
II.SEEDLINGS/WHIPS............................................................................................................................17
III.CONTAINER GROWN STOCK.............................................................................................................17
IV.BALLED AND BURLAPPED TREES......................................................................................................17
V.SOIL STABILIZATION.........................................................................................................................18
VI.PROTECTION DEVICES......................................................................................................................18
APPENDIX AA: FOREST CONSERVATION WORKSHEET.............................................................19
APPENDIX BB: FOREST CONSERVATION PROJECT PHASING..................................................20
APPENDIX CC: REFERENCES................................................................................................................21
APPENDIX DD: PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SUBMITTALS..............................................................21
ATCS, PLC Environmental
Planner 3
3. 09/01/15 Project
Name
Preliminary and Final Forest Conservation
1. The Site
The Scotland Heights Property fronts onto the north side of Berry Road
(Maryland Route 225), west of the intersection of Berry Road and
Sharpsville Road. The parcel (6th
Election District Charles County,
Maryland, Tax Map 7, Grid 4, Parcel 221) consists of approximately 88.5
acres. The property was previously mined for gravel. Field grasses now
cover areas that were mined.
Sediment control basins are located to the north and south, along the edge
of the field areas. The forested areas of the site are located around the
perimeter and to the north within the limits of the 100-year floodplain. A
350-foot wide PEPCO transmission line right-of-way runs along the
northern and western boundary of the site.
The area to the north of this right-of-way (6th
Election District, Charles
County, Maryland, Tax Map 7, Grid 3, Parcel 369)) consists of
approximately 20.2 acres of mostly forested, 100-year floodplain and
includes a portion of the Mattawoman Interceptor sanitary sewer right-of-
way which runs east and west along the center of the property.
2. Forest Stand Delineation Methodology
The Forest Stand Delineation was prepared by Greenhorne & O’Mara,
Inc, August 15, 1994 and was approved under PZDA 01-10. Soils
mapping investigation of the property was completed by Independent
Engineers and Consultants.
The Forest Points, within the report, were delineated based on the
requirements identified in the State of Maryland Forest Conservation
Manual procedures issued 12/31/91. Five stands were identified based on
a total of 14 sampling points on the site. (See the attached drawing
Boundary Survey and Site Restraints). A minimum of two (2) sampling
points per stand was taken to determine the forest structure. The on-site
forests within the 100-year floodplain were walked and identified as Stand
#6.
The report characterizes the dominant species composition by type for the
entire property. This composition is based, on a fixed Forest Plot Sample
method. A method that follows the strict guidelines set forth by the State
of Maryland, Department of Natural Resources Forest Conservation
Manual.
i. Forest Stand Association
ATCS, PLC Environmental
Planner 4
4. 09/01/15 Project
Name
Preliminary and Final Forest Conservation
The report is based using the total 88.5 acres. Three (3) distinct forest
stand associations were identified:
1. Tulip Poplar Association
2. River Birch - Sycamore Association
3. Willow Oak – Loblolly Pine Association
The Tulip Poplar forest association is located within the flatter, higher
“edge” areas of the existing forests. The River Birch – Sycamore forest
association is located within the northern forested areas of the site and
within the 100-year floodplain of the Mattawoman Creek as well as those
sloping areas which drain toward the creek floodplain. The Willow Oak –
Loblolly Pine forest stand association is located within the steeply sloping
areas in the southern section of the site along Maryland Route 225. The
differences between the stands are generally one of age and size of plant
material and not the type of plant material present and seem to reflect past
clearing practices.
The overall health of the forest stands is good. Based on field observation,
it appears that much of the forested area has been disturbed at one time.
Some sections have been selectively cleared and many areas have been
completely cleared as evidenced by the even-age of many portions of the
stands.
No rare, threatened or endangered species were observed on-site. A letter
was received from The Maryland Department of Natural Resources
Natural Heritage Program further concluded that no known Federal or
State threatened, or endangered plant or wildlife species are present on this
project site. The report also concluded that no historic sites were observed
on-site and none are indicated on the Charles County Historic Sites
Inventory Map.
Portions of the forest stands are contained within the Resource Protection
Zone (RPZ). This zone is associated with the Mattawoman Creek stream
system located north of the site and an intermittent perennial stream and
wetland system, which was identified along the southwestern portion of the
site.
Grading for the improvements to Berry Road has disturbed the isolated
intermittent perennial stream system in the southwestern portion of the site.
Numerous drainage channels run into the Mattawoman Creek floodplain in
the northern portion of the property. These drainage channels do not meet
the stream identification criteria set forth in the Charles County Resource
Protection Ordinance. These were the only tow (2) drainage areas which
show signs of an underground water source and are subsequently identified
as intermittent perennial stream channels.
ATCS, PLC Environmental
Planner 5
5. 09/01/15 Project
Name
Preliminary and Final Forest Conservation
ii. Forest Stand Conditions
Stand #1 Willow Oak Loblolly Pine Association (5.9 acres)
Stand Condition
Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua) size class 18” - 29.9” (DBH) is the
dominant species within the stand. Co-dominant species size class 6” -
9.9“ (DBH) of red maple (Acer rubrum), tulip poplar (Liriodendron
tulipifera) and sweetgum were found throughout the stand.
Intermediate and understory species include willow oak (Quercus phellos),
sassafras (Sassafras albidum), American holly (Ilex opacca), American
beech (Fagus grandifolia), river birch (Betula nigra), sweetgum, tulip
poplar and red maple.
Eight specimen trees were found within this stand and are identified on the
attached Preliminary Forest Conservation Plan. The condition of these
trees ranges from fair to good. Most of these larger trees show evidence of
dieback, some disease and insect damage. The younger trees within the
stand show no outward signs of disease or insect damage.
The shrub layer is composed primarily of seedlings of mockernut hickory
(Carya tomentosa), flowering dogwood (Cornus florida), musclewood
(Carpinus caroliniana), tulip poplar, sweetgum, river birch, red maple and
sassafras. Herbaceous growth is dominated by poison ivy
(Toxicondendron radicans), Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica),
Virginia creeper (Parthenocissus quinquefolia) and trumpet creeper
(Campsis radicans).
The stand is in good health with a high (18) forest structure value. The
stand posses a diverse understory canopy which provides a good source of
food and shelter for wildlife. Part of the stand consists of an intermittent
perennial stream that has been blocked by the grading for the Berry Road
improvements. The remaining portion of the stream shows well-incised
banks, with a silt and gravel bottom. Frogs, turtles and signs of deer were
observed in various parts of this stand. The size of the stand, perimeter
disturbances from mining and the widening of Maryland Route 228 (which
includes a grading easement into the stand) have lessened the value as a
major habitat area.
Environmental Features
The stand is associated, in part, with an intermittent perennial stream.
Grading and construction have altered the natural drainage channel of this
stream for the widening of Maryland Route 228.
ATCS, PLC Environmental
Planner 6
6. 09/01/15 Project
Name
Preliminary and Final Forest Conservation
The majority of this stand is located in Sandy Land, steep (SaE) soils that is
designated as a hydric soil. Sandy Land falls into the SCS woodland
subclass 3s, indicating moderate productivity. The remainder of the stand
contains Gravelly Land (GvE) falls into the SCS woodland subclass 4f,
indicating low productivity due to low available moisture capacity.
The stand contains no additional sensitive environmental features (100-year
floodplain, critical habitats) or valued cultural features. Adjacent land uses
include the right-of-way for Maryland Route 228, the PEPCO right-of-way
and sub-station, and lower priority on-site forests that abut the mined areas
of the site.
This stand has been identified as a high priority save area. This
classification is based, in part, on the strong forest value, intermittent
perennial stream, adjoining forested properties, steep slopes, non-tidal
wetlands and diversity of vegetation.
Stand #2 Tulip Poplar Association (7.0 acres)
Stand Condition
The stand is fairly young and even-aged. It is located along the flatter,
perimeter areas of existing on-site forests. It appears to have recent
disturbances, most likely in connection with the gravel mining operations.
Tulip poplar size class 18” - 29.9” (DBH) and sweetgum size class 10” –
17.9” (DBH) are the dominant species within the stand. Sweetgum is the
co-dominant species size class 6” - 9.9“ (DBH).
Intermediate and understory species include sweet cherry (Prunus avium),
hawthorn species (Crataegous ssp.), sweetgum, flowering dogwood,
mockernut hickory and sassafras. Portions of the perimeter of this stand
contain mimosa (Albiza julibrissin), tree-of-heaven (Ailanthus altissima)
and Virginia pine (Pinus virginiana). The herbaceous layer contains
greenbrier species (Smilax ssp.), blackberry and raspberry species (Rubus
ssp.), Japanese honeysuckle and poison ivy.
Two specimen trees were found within this stand and are identified on the
attached Preliminary Forest Conservation Plan. The condition of these
trees ranges from fair to good.
Environmental Features
This stand is located in a variety of soil types. These soils Gravelly Land
(GvE), Sandy Land (SaE), Sassafras sandy loam (ShB2), Beltsville silt
loams (B1B2, B1C2, B1C3) and Rumford gravelly sandy loam (RgB2) has
a wide variety of woodland subclass ratings and available moisture
capacity. Within these soils exist areas of possible hydric and/or soils with
ATCS, PLC Environmental
Planner 7
7. 09/01/15 Project
Name
Preliminary and Final Forest Conservation
K values ≥ 0.35, however, these forested areas are very small and isolated
and have little environmental impact by themselves.
The stand contains no additional sensitive environmental features (100-year
floodplain, critical habitats) or valued cultural features. The stand is
located along the perimeter of a majority of the existing on-site forests and
is generally located adjacent to gravel mining areas that are now fallow
fields.
The forest structure value of this stand is good, due in part to the strong
canopy and herbaceous coverage. The small size of the trees, even-age of
the stand, the amount of invasive and exotic species limits the importance
of wildlife habitat. This stand has been identified as a low priority save
area.
Stand #3 River Birch - Sycamore Association (2.4 acres)
Stand Condition
Tulip poplar, sweetgum and river birch size class 10” - 17.9” (DBH) are
the dominant species within the stand. Co-dominant species size class 6” -
9.9” (DBH) includes American sycamore (Platanus americana), tulip
poplar, sweetgum and river birch.
Intermediate and understory species include musclewood, red maple,
sweetgum and American sycamore. The shrub layer consists almost
entirely of spicebush (Lindera benzoin).
Virginia creeper and poison ivy dominate the herbaceous layer. Scattered
throughout the stand are patches of Japanese honeysuckle, partridgeberry,
Jack-in-the Pulpit, jewelweed, assorted ferns, and seedlings of southern red
oak (Quercus falcate), red maple and musclewood.
Environmental Features
The stand is located in the gently sloping, northern sections of the site
adjacent to the 100-year floodplain. It consists of three soil types:
• Gravelly Land (GvE) woodland subclass 4f low productivity
• Bibb silt loam (Bo) woodland subclass 2w high productivity,
moderately susceptible to erosion (K value ≥ 0.35), hydric soil
• Iuka sandy loam (Im) woodland subclass 1o very high
productivity, moderately susceptible to erosion (K value ≥
0.35).
The stand contains no additional sensitive environmental features (100-year
floodplain, critical habitats) or valued cultural features. Adjacent land uses
include forested areas within the floodplain and/or steep slopes.
ATCS, PLC Environmental
Planner 8
8. 09/01/15 Project
Name
Preliminary and Final Forest Conservation
The stand is in good health, with a high (17) forest structure value.
However, there appears to have been previous clearing with limited
vegetation size and diversity that lessens the value as wildlife habitat. This
stand has been identified as a medium priority save area.
Stand #4 River Birch – Sycamore Association (12.1 acres)
Stand Condition
The stand contains evidence of deer and squirrels taking advantage of the
plentiful food sources and nesting sites. A red fox was observed in the
stand. A portion of the stand is associated with an intermittent perennial
stream and most of the stand is located within steeply sloped areas over
15%.
Tulip poplar, sweetgum, willow oak and southern red oak size class 18” -
29.9” (DBH) are the dominant species in this stand. Co-dominant species
of sweetgum, American sycamore, river birch and southern red oak size
class 6” – 9.9” and 10” – 17.9”(DBH) are located throughout the stand.
Intermediate and understory species include red maple, sassafras, river
birch, musclewood, sweetgum and tulip poplar size class 2” – 5.9” (DBH).
The shrub layer consists mostly of spicebush with saplings of red maple,
musclewood, tulip poplar and willow oak.
Poison ivy and Virginia creeper dominate the herbaceous layer with
scattered areas of Japanese honeysuckle, greenbrier species and assorted
ferns.
Six (6) specimen trees were found within this stand and are identified on
the attached Preliminary Forest Conservation Plan. The condition of these
trees ranges from fair to good. Some trees show signs of crown dieback,
disease and insect damage. It appears that the dominant trees in this stand
were negatively impacted by previous disturbances associated with the
gravel mining and construction of sediment control basins.
Environmental Features
This stand is located primarily in Gravelly Land (GvE) that has low
woodland productivity, SCS subclass 4f. Rumford gravelly sandy loam
soils in the northeastern portion of the stand are moderately productive.
The stand is associated with steep slopes (≥ 15% and 25%). Drainage
ditches are prevalent throughout the stand, but only one intermittent
perennial stream was identified based on the criteria set forth in the
Charles County Forest Conservation Ordinance.
ATCS, PLC Environmental
Planner 9
9. 09/01/15 Project
Name
Preliminary and Final Forest Conservation
Within these soils exist areas of possible hydric and/or soils with K values ≥
0.35, however, these forested areas are very small and isolated and have
little environmental impact by themselves.
The stand contains no additional sensitive environmental features (100-year
floodplain, critical habitats) or valued cultural features. Adjacent land uses
include on-site forested 100-year floodplain, PEPCO right-of-way and on-
site low and medium priority forests.
This stand has been identified as a high priority save area. This
classification is based on the strong forest value, high incidence of observed
wildlife, steeply sloped areas and the adjacent Mattawoman Creek 100-year
floodplain.
Stand #5 River Birch - Sycamore Association (4.8 acres)
Stand Condition
The stand is fairly young and even-aged. It appears to have been recently
cleared.
Tulip poplar and sweetgum size class 6” - 9.9” (DBH). Sweetgum, tulip
poplar, willow oak, sassafras, southern red oak and river birch are the co-
dominant species size class 2” - 5.9“ (DBH).
Intermediate and understory species include red maple, tulip poplar,
sweetgum, river birch and American sycamore. The shrub layer contains
saplings of dogwood, red maple, sweetgum and willow oak. The
herbaceous layer contains poison ivy with selective areas of spicebush,
Virginia creeper, Japanese honeysuckle Indiana strawberry and assorted
ferns.
Environmental Features
The Gravelly Land (GvE) soil has a low woodland subclass 4f rating and
low available moisture capacity making this a marginal area for woodland
habitat. Scattered portions of the stand are located in areas with steep
slopes (≥ 15%).
The stand contains no additional sensitive environmental features (100-year
floodplain, critical habitats) or valued cultural features. The stand is
located within the northern portion of the site, adjacent to the PEPCO
right-of-way, existing on-site forests, and previous gravel mining areas that
are now fields.
The stand is in good health with a good (14) forest structure value. Due to
the small tree sizes and young even-aged of the stand, amount of invasive
ATCS, PLC Environmental
Planner 10
10. 09/01/15 Project
Name
Preliminary and Final Forest Conservation
cover in some areas limits the importance of wildlife habitat. This stand has
been identified as a low priority save area.
Stand #6 River Birch - Sycamore Association (20.5 acres)
Stand Condition
In addition to the forest stands described above, a simplified delineation
was performed for the area of the site within the 100-year floodplain
associated with the Mattawoman Creek. This area is located along the
northern portion of the project site. No forested 100 year floodplain areas
are proposed to be disturbed, except for a sewer easement which will
connect the site sewer system to the existing Mattawoman Interceptor
Sewer.
Southern red oak, American sycamore, sweetgum, and river birch size class
10” - 17.9” (DBH) are the dominant species. Southern red oak, sweetgum
and tulip poplar are the co-dominant species size class 2” - 5.9“ (DBH).
Intermediate and understory species include red maple, tulip poplar,
sweetgum, river birch and American sycamore. The shrub layer contains
saplings of dogwood, red maple, sweetgum and willow oak. The
herbaceous layer contains poison ivy with selective areas of spicebush,
Virginia creeper, Japanese honeysuckle Indiana strawberry and assorted
ferns.
Environmental Features
The Gravelly Land (GvE) soil has a low woodland subclass 4f rating and
low available moisture capacity making this a marginal area for woodland
habitat. Scattered portions of the stand are located in areas with steep
slopes (≥ 15%).
The stand contains no additional sensitive environmental features (100-year
floodplain, critical habitats) or valued cultural features. The stand is
located within the northern portion of the site, adjacent to the PEPCO
right-of-way, existing on-site forests, and previous gravel mining areas that
are now fields.
The stand is in good health with a good (14) forest structure value. Due to
the small tree sizes and young even-aged of the stand, amount of invasive
cover in some areas limits the importance of wildlife habitat.This stand has
been identified as a low priority save area.
ATCS, PLC Environmental
Planner 11
11. 09/01/15 Project
Name
Preliminary and Final Forest Conservation
3. Preliminary Forest Conservation Plan
The Preliminary Forest Conservation Plan was prepared by Greenhorne
& O’Mara, Inc. This plan was, Approved by Charles County
Environmental Division, on March 17, 1994.
(# FC 93-P116-39)
4. Forest Conservation Worksheet
The Forest Conservation Worksheet, prepared by ATCS, PLC, is in the
Appendix AA.
5. The Final Forest Conservation Plan
The Final Forest Conservation areas shown for the Second Phase of
Construction are similar with the previously Approved Preliminary Forest
Conservation Plan. The site contains a Medium Density of 68 Residential
Single Family Detached Lots. This project is on 38.90 acres or 20.36 % of
the total project. There are on-site areas available for part of the
Reforestation Replanting Requirement. The remaining area will be
obtained off-site. (See Appendix BB)
A. Project Phasing
The total net tract area of the proposed subdivision is 191.1 acres. The
project is divided into two construction phases.
The First Construction Phase represents 28.36% of the Approved
Preliminary Forest Conservation Plan, and results in a net tract area of 54.2
acres.
The Second Construction Phase represents 20.36% of the Approved
Preliminary Forest Conservation Plan or a net tract area of 38.9 acres. (See
Appendix BB)
The remaining Construction Phases represent 51.28% of the Approved
Preliminary Forest Conservation Plan or a net tract area of 98.0 acres. (See
Appendix BB)
In the First Construction Phase, the total required Forest Conservation is
21.86 acres. This is calculated by taking the percentage of land in the first
phase from the entire site total. This percentage is 28.36% of the total
forest conservation area for the entire site, (.2836 x 77.1). The Final
Forest Conservation Plan shows retention of 11.06 acres of existing trees
to be saved on-site. (See Appendix BB)
ATCS, PLC Environmental
Planner 12
12. 09/01/15 Project
Name
Preliminary and Final Forest Conservation
In addition, an area of 3.94 acres will be reforested on-site. The remaining
6.86 acres will be reforested off-site. Because this acreage will not be
located on-site, a special off-site planting penalty is imposed. This penalty
is figured by doubling the required planting rate. More simply stated, a
ratio of two to one replacements is implied. This is calculated as (6.86 ac.
x 2) or 13.72 acres. This will complete the Final Forest Conservation
obligation for the First Phase of construction. In the event that extra land
is purchased, the extra area of land will be credited to the Second Phase of
this development. (see Appendix BB)
The Second Construction Phase consists of 38.90 acres of the Net Tract
Area. This represents 20.36% of the total Hunter’s Brooke 191.1 acreage.
The required acreage for the forest conservation for the second phase is
15.69 acres. This is calculated by taking the percentage of land in the
second phase from the entire site total. This percentage is 20.36% of the
total forest conservation area for the entire site, (.2036 x 77.1).
The Final Forest Conservation areas consist of 98.0 acres of the Net Tract
Area. This represents 51.28% of the total Hunter’s Brooke 191.1 acreage.
The required acreage for the forest conservation for the final phase is 39.54
acres. This is calculated by taking the percentage of land in the second
phase from the entire site total. This percentage is 51.28% of the total
forest conservation area for the entire site, (.5128 x 77.1).
The proposed off-site Forest Conservation reforestation areas will be
located in Charles County. The Charles County Environmental Division
will approve these off-site reforestation sites. The Forest Conservation
signs and fencing will be in accordance with the Charles County Forest
Conservation Ordinance.
ii. Long Term Protection
Long term protection for both on-site and off-site reforestation area, are
described in Forest Conservation Easement.
iii. State and Federal Permits
All necessary approvals from State and Federal Agencies will be obtained
prior to the issuance of any County Site Development Permit, or the Site
will be redesigned as necessary.
6. Construction Time Table /Forest Protection Plan
A. Short Term (Construction)
Prior to the start of any construction, the boundary of the Forest
Conservation Easement will be delineated. The forest area to be saved will
be delineated by tying blue flagging surveyors tape to existing trees and/or
ATCS, PLC Environmental
Planner 13
13. 09/01/15 Project
Name
Preliminary and Final Forest Conservation
field stakes in the field. The installation of Forest Retention Warning Signs
will also be installed in accordance with the approved plan.
The flagged surveyors tape will be affixed to the primary trunks of the
trees, (2”) two inches or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). If the
boundary is devoid of existing trees, 2”x 2” x 4’ high wooden stakes at 40’
centers along the proposed Limit of Disturbance (LOD) line will be
installed. The same blue surveyors tape as used to mark the saved trees
will be used to delineate the edge of the Forest Conservation Easement
Boundary in the areas devoid of trees.
Forest Retention Warning Signs will be installed every 120’ along the
entire Forest Conservation Boundary line. At least one of these signs will
appear for each developed subdivision lot. Special attention will be placed
on adding additional warning signs for each lot that abuts this proposed
Forest Conservation Easement area. In addition, at least two flags will be
used for each lot abutting the Forest Conservation Boundary.
• The Forest Retention Warning Signs will be similar to the type shown
in Appendix J, of the 1991 Forest Conservation Manual, or a type may
be approved by the Project Planner of the Charles County
Environmental Division. The locations of the Forest Retention Warning
Signs for construction are shown on the Final Forest Conservation
Plan.
Prior to the start of construction, the Forest Protection Fencing (or
approved modified silt fencing), as shown in Appendix J, of the 1991
Forest Conservation Manual, (figure J-8), will be installed. This fencing
installation is at the edge of the line where the site ground disturbance ends
and no ground disturbance begins. This is shown on the plans as the LOD
Line. This special fencing only occurs in the areas that are within 40’ feet
of a proposed Forest Conservation Easement. These areas are shown on
the Final Forest Conservation Plan.
Prior to the start of construction, the applicant will schedule a Pre-
Construction Meeting with the Charles County Environmental Planner
(301/ 645-0540), to address the implementation of the proposed Forest
Conservation Plan.
• The installation of the blue surveyors tape Flagging, the Forest
Conservation Warning Signs, and any additional required fencing will
be inspected at this meeting.
•
• Following the Completion of the construction, the applicant will
arrange a Post-Construction Meeting with the Charles County
Environmental Planner (301/ 645-0540), to address the
implementation of the Forest Conservation Plan.
ATCS, PLC Environmental
Planner 14
14. 09/01/15 Project
Name
Preliminary and Final Forest Conservation
•
• Compliance with observing the LOD line will be inspected. The
Approval to remove the Forest Protection Fencing will be granted, at
the discretion of the Charles County Environmental Planner.
•
• The Forest Conservation Flagging and Forest Conservation Warning
Signs located on the subdivision lots will remain and be maintained
until a Post Construction Inspection has taken place on the initial
project for which the permit was issued.
•
• At all other locations on-site, the Forest Conservation Flagging and
Forest Conservation Warning Signs will remain for a period of two (2)
years after the recordation of the Final Plat.
ii. LONG TERM
Forest Conservation Easements will be used to enclose and protect all
Proposed Reforestation and Tree Save Areas. This measure of additional
protection will be incorporated as Long Term Protection Devices.
Additional Restrictions and the allowable uses of these restricted areas are
further detailed in these environmental easement documents.
7. Reforestation
A. Species Selection
Species native to the physiographic region of the State shall be used unless
a planting plan utilizing landscaping techniques specifies cultivars or
alternatives as approved by the approving authority. Alternatively, plant
selection may be established under an approved Forest Stewardship Plan or
other forest management plan.
Locally acclimated and genetic stock is preferred for hardiness and disease
resistance, as well as to conserve existing local genetic stock.
Selection may be based on the forest association for the planting site, using
the information collected in the Forest Stand Delineation of through
adjacent forest communities. Forest associations have been described by
Brush et al (1980) and by Eyre (Society of American Foresters, 1980).
ii. Plant Stocking
Minimum densities at planting and at the release of the 2-year maintenance
and monitoring agreement for types of stock are shown in Figure A. When
planting a combination of sizes and stock types, these requirements may be
pro-rated. These densities and spacing calculations do not imply that
ATCS, PLC Environmental
Planner 15
15. 09/01/15 Project
Name
Preliminary and Final Forest Conservation
plants should be installed in a grid pattern. Plants grouped in clusters,
random or associated patterns may irritate natural forest establishment.
Suggestions for mixing stock and sizes include:
• Plant larger stock around the perimeter in order to protect interior
smaller stock.
• Mix stock sizes when no mechanized equipment is proposed for use
on-site.
• Mix stock sizes when seedlings are thoroughly mulched.
• Use smaller stock for under story trees and larger stock for overstory in
random patterns.
• Use larger stock and maintenance in areas to be affected by human
activity.
iii. Site Preparation
Proper installation in undisturbed soils may not require extensive site
preparation. When soils have been compacted or organic or topsoil layers
have been removed by grading, treatment will be necessary. Reserve
topsoil should be replaced in the planting area. If supplemental fill is
required, it may be mixed with the reserved topsoil. Nutrient, organic
matter, soil texture and other analyses may be required to evaluate soil
amendments or treatments. Additional information may be found in
references on planting and soils.
Prevailing soil moisture conditions and changes in hydrology should also be
evaluated for the proposed planting techniques. The proposed grading
plan, prior site analyses as well as on-site assessment will be important to
this evaluation.
In disturbed soils, a planting field should be prepared for each plant. A
planting field with a radius of 5 times the diameter of the root ball is
recommended for nursery stock.
In areas of steep slopes or erodible soils, soil disturbance should be limited
to a planting field with a radius of 2.5 times the diameter of the root ball
for nursery stock.
Disturbed soils shall be treated by evenly incorporating composted organic
material, and other amendments, as determined by a soils analysis, within
the top 12 inches. If fill material is used at the planting site, it shall be
clean and topped with a minimum of 12 inches of organic topsoil.
Stockpiling of native top soils should not compost or damage the
remaining seed bank.
iv. Planting Times
ATCS, PLC Environmental
Planner 16
16. 09/01/15 Project
Name
Preliminary and Final Forest Conservation
Plants, which are not planted within a day after delivery to the site should
be protected from desiccation through shading, watering, shielded from
wind or other methods. Bare rootstock may be heeled in. Transplanted or
delivered materials may be stored in tree banks if necessary in undisturbed
areas.
8. Planting Specifications
A. On-site Inspection
Prior to planting, inspect planting stock. Plants not conforming to the
American Standard For Nursery Stock specifications for size, form, vigor,
or roots, or due to trunk wounds, insects and disease should be replaced.
Planting material shall be at the rate and species indicated on the Project
Cover Sheet drawing.
ii. Seedlings/Whips
Planting small stock, such as seedlings and whips, can be accomplished
using manual methods of planting. Equipment may include shovels,
planting or dibble bars, and matstocks. For larger areas, planting machines
are occasionally used, but may result initially in linear, plantation-like
forests.
Extreme care should be taken to ensure plant roots retain moisture. While
planting seedlings and whips, use a moist carrying container to further
prevent desiccation. For greater protection, plant some seedlings with tree
shelters.
Areas planted with seedlings or whips should be mulched after planting.
iii. Container Grown Stock
Successful planting of container stock requires careful site preparation and
inspection of the root system. Caution is recommended when selecting
plants grown in a soils medium different from that of the planting site. The
plant should be removed from the container and the roots gently and
somewhat loosened. If the roots encircle the root ball, or a “J”-shaped or
kinked roots are present, replace the plant.
After preparation of a planting field, backfill stockpiled soils. Rake soils
evenly over the planting field and cover with 2 to 4 inches of mulch.
iv. Balled and Burlapped Trees
Tree stock greater than 2” caliper is usually planted using tree spades. This
is particularly useful when transplanting on-site or with local plant
ATCS, PLC Environmental
Planner 17
17. 09/01/15 Project
Name
Preliminary and Final Forest Conservation
materials. For trees larger than 6” caliper, specialized equipment is
recommended.
Balled and burlapped trees must be handled with care while planting. Do
not pick up trees by the trunk or drop them, as this will tend to separate the
trunk from the root ball. Prior to planting, root balls should be kept moist.
Water planting field to settle soil backfilled around trees once planted.
Rake soils evenly over the planting field and cover with 2 to 4 inches of
mulch.
v. Soil Stabilization
For areas of large-scale disturbance, stabilize soils with non-turf-building
ground cover or engineering fabric.
vi. Protection Devices
To prevent damage of planted areas, post all reforestation and
Afforestation sites with appropriate signs and fences. Construction
equipment should not enter planting areas.
ATCS, PLC Environmental
Planner 18
18. 09/01/15 Project
Name
Preliminary and Final Forest Conservation
Appendix AA: Forest Conservation Worksheet
** Preliminary Forest Conservation Plan
Approved on March 17, 1994,
(# FC 93-P116-39)
This Plan was prepared by
ATCS, PLC
Waldorf, Maryland
Preliminary Forest Conservation Plan
#FC 93-P116-39
ATCS, PLC Environmental
Planner 19
19. 09/01/15 Project
Name
Preliminary and Final Forest Conservation
Appendix BB: Forest Conservation Project Phasing
Determining Forest Conservation for Project Phasing
ATCS, PLC Environmental
Planner 20
20. 09/01/15 Project
Name
Preliminary and Final Forest Conservation
Appendix CC: References
Charles County, Planning Division, 1997. Amended #96-91,
Department of Planning and Growth Management, Forest Conservation
Ordinance.
Darr, L 1991. A Technical Manual for Woodland Conservation with
Development in Prince George’s County. MNCPP&C Planning
Department, Natural Resources Division.
Lyon, J.G. 1993. Practical Handbook of Wetland Identification and
Delineation focusing on coastal and riverine wetlands and associated
vegetation.
Maryland Department of Natural Resources 1991. Forest Conservation
Manual, Natural Resources Article, Title 5, Forest and Parks, Subtitle 16.
Forest Conservation, Code of Maryland Regulations.
Tiner, Jr. R.W. 1988. Field Guild to Non-Tidal Wetland Identification.
Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Annapolis, Maryland.
Appendix DD: Previously Approved Submittals
Forest Stand Delineation Plan, Approved on March 4, 1994,
(#FC 93-P116-39) this study prepared by Natural Resource Inventory,
Inc., Landscape Architects, La Plata, Maryland.
Preliminary Forest Conservation Plan, Approved on March 17, 1994,
(# FC 93-P116-39) this study prepared by Greenhorne & O’Mara, Inc.,
Landscape Architects, Engineers, Waldorf, Maryland.
ATCS, PLC Environmental
Planner 21